Honour the Victims of War - Punish the Perpetrators

The 11th November, marks Armistice Day - the day when the Great War (subsequently known as the First World War), formally ended. The exact timing chosen for the Armistice was 11 o'clock on the 11th day of the 11th Month (11/11, 11). Does it strike anyone as odd that a war could end in such a numerologically significant manner? How was this possible? Simply because that is how the end to the ritual slaughter of the Great War was planned.

The annual spectacle of Remembrance Day ostensibly commemorates the sacrifice of the men and women who died fighting for the survival of the British Empire in the War of 1914-18. Subsequent wars involving the British military (with the exception of the 1948 War in Palestine) have been added to the Great War, as a focus for contemplation. Alike to every almost officially sanctioned event, the truth behind the ceremony is very different to that which we are made to believe.

The Great War of 1914-18 was an exercise in imperialism. Great Britain and her Empire were not threatened in any manner by any foreign power. The men who rushed to enlist were victims of hysterical jingoist propaganda. As the war progressed, the much promised quick victory over continental Europe was exposed as a political lie. After it became impossible to continue to romanticise the murder by the State of Britain's idealistic young men, (who were marched into the bullets of a similarly brain-washed and coerced opposition army), conscription was introduced. Brave men who refused to be cannon fodder were murdered in cold blood by the establishment, whilst those who were forced under threat of execution to fight, were ritually butchered as agreed by the monsters of the Royal Family in London and Berlin.

The Great War was won in 1917 by Germany, which offered to restore the battered land of Europe to its pre-war status. However, the fully plutocratic establishment of Great Britain refused to accept this chivalrous offer and instead sought to extend the war by enticing the USA to join on Britain's side. To achieve this, the nation of Palestine was promised to International Zionism. The American media were mobilised to push stories of German barbarity to the American people in order to so enrage them that they would support the insanity of a foreign war for the benefit of no-one other than a self-chosen elite.

At the end of the Great War, the financial elite were given control over Palestine, and the countries which had stood in the way of International Finance were handed over to the same mafia who now had a foothold in the Middle East. The Christian nation of Russia, which formed the frontier between Europe and the non-White world, was handed over to asiatics with their ancestry rooted in Khazaria. The heroic Russians fought back against this alien take-over of their nation, but were defeated by the financial might of the Khazars in London and Washington who provided every possible assistance to ensure their brethren maintained control of the enslaved Russian Nation. Attempts to install similar regimes across Europe in order to completely destroy Christian Europe, by imposing Communist fronts in the Orthodox and Catholic nations, to match the Capitalist fronts in the Judaeo-Protestant lands they already controlled, had to be delayed. Interestingly, the Romanov dynasty which had resisted the advance of Zionism were ritually murdered, but the Hapsburgs who acted in concert with the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas to create the War in the first place, received no such treatment.

The Great War was labelled as the 'war to end all wars'. This was, of course, nonsense.

The failure of the Khazar elite to capture all of Europe necessitated another war. This was accomplished using the illegitimate Rothschild, Adolf Hitler, and Soviet plants in the NSDAP hierarchy such as Martin Bormann. Conning the German people with promises of restoring to the Reich the territories stolen from it by the Zionist victors, the patriotic German people were pushed into an unwanted war, from which all that was gained was the further dismemberment of the nation and the slaughter of all who had a healthy appreciation of the need for an undying defence of faith, folk and fatherland. Unbelievably, in Britain, Oswald Mosely ordered members of his British Union of Fascists to murder fellow Europeans at the demand of the Zionist London regime! By associating the opposition to Globalism with an opposition to all things Jewish, the Zionist elite (who are nearly entirely non-Semitic) managed to instill in the people of Europe a suicidal worldview which categorised as the natural desire for National Freedom and Social Justice as synonymous with the desire for anti-Semitic genocide. The fact that the Holyhoax was a barefaced lie thought up by the diseased minds of Zionist Washington, Moscow and London, in no way weakened this Pavlovian linkage of thought, which has become the death-wish of Europe worldwide.

Alike to the false promise of the Great War that it would be a war to end all wars, the Second World War was sold to the people as a war to liberate Poland (which itself immorally occupied land alien to it). Poland remained subject to the control of the Khazar USSR for nearly half a century before experiencing a brief period of freedom, followed by absorption into the Khazar EU. Former Polish territory is still administered by other nations. The Second World War strengthened by Zionist move to Globalism and all who died, like those who died in the Great War, died in vain.

Since 1945, the British military have been involved in wars across the world. In many they have been publicly humiliated as the Empire has collapsed to the point that aside from a few rocks scattered across the globe, the British nation has been reduced to the British Isles alone (and not even to all of them). The same elite control the interests which were formally known as the Empire, but they operate behind the scenes rather than overtly. Now, Britain herself has been absorbed by the European Union, and the age old dream of the Khazars to occupy all of Europe has been realised. Khazars control every nation of the EU, Eurasia, North America, and elsewhere. This is what the wars of the Twentieth Century achieved.

Now, in the early Twentyfirst Century, we have the lie of the War on Terror. TV-viewing retards have been convinced that for the first time ever (and not since) steel-framed buildings have collapsed to dust due to fire (I wish I was joking, but this is the fable), and that a tiny group of Muslim extremists are responsible. Those who know this is absurd are herded by the likes of Alex Jones into believing that '9/11 was an inside job' - safely venting their anger at political puppets who serve the real Zionist culprits who control the establishments of the EU, USA, etc. This has led to the ongoing wars in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia, in which British, American and allied servicemen are murdering civilians on an industrial scale. In Iraq alone the death-toll is approaching two million - people murdered in their own countries for the crime of living in territory with resources, artifacts, and strategic importance coveted by the Globalists.

In Afghanistan, the British and American military are guarding the poppy fields to ensure that our streets are awash with the poison of Heroin, which destroys individuals, families, and entire communities. These same soldiers are treated as heroes when they parade in British and American towns. How are they heroes? What is heroic about murdering people in their homes, enforcing food and medicine embargoes to kill civilians (especially babies) with malnutrition and disease, and with helping the establishment to produce drugs which are wrecking the home nations? The heroes are the men and women of the (Afghani and Iraqi) Resistance who are fighting to remove the forces of occupation from their lands. These people are labelled by the Zionist media lie machine as Terrorists.

On Remembrance Day we must remember the victims of war - the civilians butchered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Palestine, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, and too many other places; the soldiers who naively volunteered to enlist in the military in wars which served no national interest, and which in fact invited attack by people reacting to the actions of soldiers in uniforms bearing our flags; the conscripts who fought against their will, the conscientious objectors and deserters who were murdered for doing the right thing and refusing to fight for the Khazar elite. We must also remember those responsible for war - the Zionist-Plutocratic-Masonic-Royal Establishment; the psychopathic volunteers who enjoy killing for money; the politicians and media who push the lie that we must 'support our troops' in these insane and criminal campaigns.

The Armed Forces should exist for the sole purpose of defending the Nation from all who threaten it - be they financial parasites, Monarchists, Sabbatean Cultists, unassimiable immigrants or those who advocate imperialism and atrocities on our own or foreign shores. The most fitting tribute to the victims of war is to campaign for the military to be brought home, and for the war criminals in or out of uniform to be executed. Never again must our military be reduced to the role of paid butchers in service of our real enemies. The role of the military should be to defend the nation from enemies domestic and foreign who threaten our homeland - nothing else. National Freedom and Imperialism cannot coexist. No more wars for Zionist Profit and Empire.

Remember, remember, the 5th of November

Today in England is the festival known as Bonfire Night. This festival involves the usual English traditional celebrations such as eating junk and drinking too much, but unlike other festivals it has not degenerated into a big shopping bonanza. Instead, it continues in much the same way as it has for centuries, with processions of people in historic garb, solemnly taking the effigy of Guy Fawkes through the streets to the steady beat of the drum, finally arriving at a bonfire, upon which it is placed and set alight. This is followed by a fireworks display.

Guy Fawkes hailed from Yorkshire - the historic county of Northern England which was also home to the much loved Robin Hood. Alike to Robin Hood, Guy Fawkes was a revolutionary who sought to help the people of England by combating the anti-Christian despots who had usurped power from the indigenous population. Unlike Robin Hood, the truth of whom is shrouded in mystery and folklore, Fawkes is well documented. He heroically fought against the despicable Stadholders in the Spanish Netherlands in an attempt to liberate the people from the tyranny of Protestantism. It was in the Netherlands that Fawkes became an expert in the use of explosives - an expertise which made him a key part in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

In 1605 England was ruled by King James I. This was the monarch responsible for the blasphemous King James Bible in which it is stated that Kings rule by Divine Right. This Bible has become the most widely used Protestant Bible and is so far removed from the real Christian texts that it sits better alongside the Talmud than it does the teachings of Christ. In 1604, King James attacked the Catholics of England in such strong terms that it became certain that the persecution of Christians by the Protestant heretics would be increased beyond any tolerable limits. This fear would prove to be prophetic as within the century came the rule of Oliver Cromwell - the most evil man to rule England since William the Bastard.

Driven to desperate measures, the Gunpowder Plotters led by Robert Catesby set out to bomb the Palace of Westminster during the State Opening of Parliament whilst the hated King James and his diabolical family were present, alongside the Members of Parliament, the Nobility, the Aristocracy and the entire leadership of the Anglican-Satanic Cult. Had the Plot been successful, England would have been freed from the nightmare it had endured since Elizabethan times, and could have returned to its true path as a beacon for Christianity and a bulwark against the power of Judaic-usury. Sadly, well-meaning plotters informed their friends in Parliament of the need to keep away from the building on that fateful day - and these lackeys of the establishment betrayed them to the Monarch's Secret Police. The result was the arrest of the Plotters and the continuation of the anti-Christ rule over England.

To his eternal credit, even though Guy Fawkes suffered the most unimaginable tortures, this true hero refused to name any of his co-conspirators, save only the ones he knew were already dead. Sentenced to be 'Hung, Drawn and Quartered', Fawkes cheated the sick and depraved blood lust of the Monarchy by hurling himself from the hangman's scaffold, breaking his neck - thus depriving the enemies of humanity from ripping him apart whilst still alive.

Guy Fawkes will forever be remembered as the man who attempted to destroy the rule of King James and those around him who we would now call Zionists. To quote the popular rhyme :

"Remember, remember, the Fifth of November,
Gunpowder, (t)reason and plot,
I see no reason why gunpowder treason,
Should ever be forgot."

Well said. Let us forever remember this honourable gentleman and his comrades who fought to save us from those he foresaw would enslave us all.

Guido Fawkes - Presente!

Double Speak in action

Political Correctness was designed in the Soviet Union to control how people express themselves, and by extension, how they think. The theory is quite simple - control what words people are allowed to use, manipulate the meanings attached to individual terms, and by so doing, limit the possible linguistic expression available, thus preventing dissent by removing the ability of the individual to put into words any feelings of opposition to the establishment agenda. By controlling language, the theory maintains that the ability to think in a manner which is dangerous to the ruling regime, will become impossible, and thus opposition in any tangible form will become impossible.

This is, of course, complete nonsense! People do not think with words, but with images (consider your memories - they are like films inside your head and not akin to the words in a book). However, the politically correct mafia have such faith in their ideology that they undertake their assault on language with the zeal of unbridled fanaticism. They are damaging our language, and in fact every language which has come under their scrutiny. With regards to English in particular, they are so distorting the meaning of words as to make the language barely intelligible to those who are not fully cognisant of the language as it should be used. Whether it is the niggling use of the word 'they' (plural) in place of he or she (singular), or the use of 'she' to refer to a man who has a mental illness and has had himself castrated in the bizarre belief that by having no penis he will magically become a woman, (rather than a mutilated man, which is what he is), the English language in its every day use is becoming absurd. Foreigners trying to learn English must find this corruption of the language confusing and irritating.

A serious result of the politicisation of the language is the perceived danger of being ridiculed for having opinions which are out of fashion (i.e. forbidden by the media manipulators), or being unpopular and seen as an elitist for using English in a manner which doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator. It has become a badge of honour to speak and act in the way of a mental retard. Using words of more than one syllable invites reactions such as "what's up wiv you mate, dya swallow a dickshunairee?" suggesting that it is a bad thing to seek self-improvement through the acquisition of knowledge and the ability to effectively communicate using the vocabulary suited to an adult level. This, of course, is the whole point of political correctness - to 'dumb down' the population to the point where they are barely human and are thus more easily controlled, like the cattle they have become.

It is routine for the commissars of political correctness to claim that not only does political correctness not exist(!), but if it did, it would be a benevolent phenomenon, which only 'haters' and bigots could object to. By this simple ploy, all criticism of the manipulation of society is silenced - well, that is the idea at any rate. Anyone who is not totally submersed in the propaganda system which passes for the news and entertainment media cannot fail to see that the way ideas and events are presented is highly controlled, and nothing at all is left to chance which the media manipulators can control.

The English language, like all living languages, goes through changes, with some words reversing their meanings over and over. With regards to everyday words which have no real cultural value, this is of little importance. The natural development of the language contrasts with the PC agenda in that it is orchestrated by the establishment and pushed at every level. The only comparable example, (in times other than those of conquest), of the high level distortion of English in our past is that of the Elizabethan era, in which the Freemasonic Francis Bacon created a whole array of new words, to knit together the various dialects of England into a unified national language. At the time, 'English' spoken in the North was as different from that of the South as Plat Deutsch is to Bairisch for our Anglo-Saxon brethren in Germany in our day. Defenders of the English State will argue that Bacon's deeds helped forge a national culture, in place of the regional cultures which preceded it. Whether one considers this a good or bad thing is an issue in itself. Personally, I find abhorrent the destruction of our indigenous organic cultures in the service of the imperialism of the ruling elite, but in Bacon's defence, the vocabulary of the enhanced language was greatly increased. Try as one may, it is impossible to find any positive consequences of the modern Political Correctness sickness.

The distortion of words is important insofar as words connected with our culture and heritage when lost amount to a break with our ancestors. The old systems of measurements for example, are being lost in order to create a single global system. This would not be a problem but for the fact that the traditional units of measurement link us with the past and help us understand the truth of our world, not the lies given us by court historians. For example, the English Mile is an exact division of the measurement of the circumference of the planet. It was created after the Earth was measured, proving that our ancestors were not savages, but were in fact highly intelligent and technologically advanced. The Politically Correct lie of Evolution maintains that humans came from monkeys, who in turn came from primordial slime, which came out of the big bang when gases just happened to explode (although where these gases came from isn't explained). The demise of the English Mile removes the link to the ancient measuring system which proves that our forebears were not apes, but people - like us, nay better than us. The Materialist-Darwinist lie of Evolution is a key point of the PC argument. They claim we are all 'the same' and 'equal' and they justify this with the ludicrous theory of evolution, which is taught in schools as fact. The theory is so full of holes as to be nonsensical. Giving us the culturally and historically neutral Kilometre in place of the ancient Mile adds validity to their theory by removing evidence from human knowledge which proves that advanced civilisations were in place at least 100,000 years ago, when the Darwinist-Communist-PC liars would have us living in trees and eating bananas.

Alongside the twisting of words and the attack on basic grammar used by the PC mafia, is the assault on intelligence, with the focus upon trivia as a new source of wisdom. Turn on the TV or Radio or read a 'Newspaper' and you will be bombarded with stories of which 'celebrity' is having sex with which 'sports star', or some other such nonsense. People shout and scream like inmates of a lunatic asylum at contestants on game shows, and is if that isn't bad enough, they congratulate one another and take pride in the fact that they have learnt every tiny piece of irrelevant information that the mass media have chosen to spoon feed them. Never mind that they are sleep-walking slaves trapped in an economic system which could destroy their lives in an instant, no, they can repeat the tedious details which they have swallowed form years of obediently devouring what their masters have provided for them in the circus of TV living. This 'pride' should be a sense of pride for the establishment as it indicates just how successful they have become at controlling the masses.

The 'news' media is full of propaganda in support of the criminal wars of aggression being fought by the unthinking robots who are labelled as soldiers, on behalf of the globalist elite. There are decent soldiers who are refusing to fight and are quitting the Armed Forces in disgust at being used not to protect their nations, but to destroy obstacles to the Global Superstate which is step-by-step absorbing ALL nations. These men and women who refuse to serve are the true heroes, not the scum who blindly obey orders and murder civilians of all ages and foreign soldiers and members of the Resistance protecting their own people in their own lands. Ask any flag-waving drooling TV viewer what is going on in the world, and the reaction will be a repetition of whatever that dumbed-down individual has been exposed to. Even those who can see that politicians lie will still parrot support for 'our boys' - stating that we have to support the troops even though they are butchering the people of foreign lands and paving the way for their international counterparts to do the same to us, right here. Sickeningly, people cheer in the streets when these paid psychopaths march in the streets freshly returned from their tours of occupied lands, their flesh only recently scrubbed clean of the blood of the innocents they have hacked to pieces for the Global leadership. Such is the power of the media to make otherwise intelligent people speak and act as morons.

The greatest victory of the pushers of the Political Correctness machine is that people see the ridiculous examples of men in frocks being called women, or men 'marrying' men, or quota systems giving work to people unsuited to particular jobs solely because they fit a stereotype which the PC mafia maintain doesn't matter! By seeing the ludicrous and pointless, people focus upon the irrelevant, and fight against side-issues. This keeps attention away from the bigger picture and allows the Globalists to advance their agenda unhindered. The likes of Common Purpose are seen as liberal extremists and political crackpots, precisely because the real power behind them want them to be seen as such. They are puppets in a pantomime show and we have been directed to watch them, whilst all the while our hidden masters are sending their agents amongst us to pilfer from our pockets and steal us of our heritage, our present, and our future.

England: Land of Evil

The English are a hard-pressed people. In many ways we as a people are an example of what the globalists have in store for the world. We have been manipulated by our rulers to the point that we take pride in what has been done to us, and what we have done to others at the behest of our rulers. In true Orwellian style, we have come to love Big Brother.

How did this sorry state come to pass? How did the people of the Norse Eddas, mingled with Rome, Germania, and the truly magickal people of the Celtic nation, become so subservient to the alien presence that not only do we not revolt against our oppressors, but we actively persecute those who can see the reality beyond the pantomime? How did the English become the engine of the globalist machine which is destroying every people and culture on the planet, replacing them with a sub-human mass of organic robots, with no allegiance to anything except self, materialism and survival?

To understand how debased the English have become, we need to go back to a time when being English was a badge of honour. The nation of England was born in 986 with the fusion of the smaller nations which had occupied the land up to that time. England existed as a sovereign land until 1066 when the 'Norsemen' invaded. Led by William the Bastard, the Norman conquest saw England reduced to a vassal of a foreign power. The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom which had gradually been forged with the admixture of related European peoples was subjected to a new regime, which rather than blending with the general population, imposed its will by means of harsh persecution and butchery of all who refused to accept the new overlords. The Feudal System was modelled along Talmudic lines to suit the new rulers who were Christian in name only, if at all. This tragedy in the history of the English was unparalleled in its brutality by any invasion prior or since. Even the horrors inflicted upon the Druids by the Romans paled in comparison with the slaughter unleashed by the Normans and those who collaborated with them.

Following the Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon England was changed forever. The traditional organic moot system of government was replaced by the feudal system. Whereas before, leaders ruled with the consent and approval of a cooperative people, under the new system, rule was imposed by fear and the use of barbarity and cruelty of truly Biblical proportions. It was with the arrival of the cosmopolitan Norman ruling elite that the divisive class system was introduced. The spiritual quality of the nation was undermined with the wholesale butchery of the clergy. The Anglo-Saxon language was likewise attacked, with French being imposed as the official language of commerce and government. The French tongue trickled into the vernacular of the masses creating the hybrid language which evolved into the English spoken today.

The hatred for the French-speaking elite has been passed down through the generations in folklore. Anyone who knows the story of Robin hood will know that he was a native of Yorkshire who led raids upon the lackeys of the establishment, and then redistributed the wealth thus obtained amongst his impoverished Anglo-Saxon kinsmen. Across the channel in France, the same hated establishment so persecuted the native population that in time they rose up and beheaded those who ruled them and claimed to be French. In England, a similar uprising did not occur. A hatred of all things French bedded into the popular culture, which was ironic, as the real French were as much victims of the establishment oppressors as were the English - in classic divide and rule style, the focus of animosity was targeted against a linguistic group, not against the true enemy who happened to speak their language. Certainly, the Royal Family in England were deposed, but during the short-lived Commonweal of Cromwell, the tyranny of the state was accelerated to the point that the hated Royals were given back the position of authority which they had enjoyed before the revolt. The ruling class did not experience the same justice as their brethren across the Channel and for them the English Republic was but a brief break in overt control. In truth, the rulers of the Republic were from the same families as beforehand, thus there was no break in the rule by the Royal despots at all.

In the run up to the regime of the puppet Republic, the Royals ensured that their control was extended to the farthest reaches of the nation. Contrary to the romantic myth, the Royals were hated by the general population who viewed them as outsiders who had stolen the Crown from the indigenous rulers. The nation of England following the Norman invasion, has not to this day seen a true Anglo-Saxon on the Throne.

In the first English Civil War - a War which has become known as the War of the Roses - the 'French' elite fought against their 'Welsh' cousins for mastery of England. The bloodshed was such that to this very day there is animosity between the counties of Yorkshire (the White Rose) and Lancashire (the Red Rose). The War served only to advance the agenda of the Royal dictators. Foolish Englishmen from Yorkshire and Lancashire still hold a burning hatred for one another for the crimes committed by the rulers they still champion. It is one thing to honour our dead ancestors, but an entirely different matter to revere the butchers whose blood lust and power-mania was the sole cause of their deaths. With the defeat of the Plantagenets, the ruling power passed to the house of Tudor. The Tudor dynasty hailed from Wales which although a nation in its own right, has been ruled by the English for centuries. Ironically although the true Britons were pushed into Wales by the waves of European invaders, the bloodline of the Tudors was tainted by blood from further afield - the same taint as the 'french' rulers they deposed. The Tudors were as harmful to the English as the faux-French monarchs they replaced.

Akin to all the despots who have ruled England, Henry VIII was a cruel and twisted tyrant. His most famous crime was splitting the Church. A man obsessed with his own selfish interests, this gluttonous oaf was a serial adulterer and murderer. Married to Catherine of Aragon, he allowed his lust for Ann Boleyn to go before the needs of the nation he ruled over. Confronted by a woman who refused to allow her body to be used as he saw fit in an adulteress manner, the sex-obsessed egomaniac ordered his lackeys to annul his marriage - in spite of the fact that there were no acceptable grounds for this. The Pope had no choice but to excommunicate Henry the heretic. The despicable Monarch soon tired of his new 'wife' and in due course ended his officially sanctioned cohabitation ('marriage'). Ann Boleyn was, unlike Catherine of Aragon, not the daughter of a powerful Monarch, so he had no need to fraudulently annul the arrangement - he simply had her beheaded - ostensibly for incestuous adultery which ironically was classed as treason. Henry VIII went on to divorce another 'wife', and behead another. Such was the glorious beginning of the Church of England.

Henry VIII may have been the man responsible for rift between the English Monarchy and the Roman Catholic Church IN England, but it was his daughter, Elizabeth, who created the Church OF England as a separate entity. The entire justification for the founding of the Church was to legitimise the adultery, divorce and remarriage of Henry VIII. From this one event followed centuries of persecution of Catholics who held true to the Christian faith and rejected the Satanic Cult which had supplanted it in England. It is a sad indictment of the character of the English that the majority betrayed their faith and adopted the anti-Christ cult of the Royalty. To be fair, there was stiff resistance in the early days of the C of E, and it took the insane tortures ordered by the establishment (Royal and Cromwellian) to finally break the Catholic Church in England.

Stripped of its spiritual defence, England was open for the return of the descendants of the Talmudists who had been expelled in 1290 by the Catholic King, Edward Longshanks. For all his ills, the King acted in the manner of a true Christian and realising that the Talmudists could not be allowed to stay in England if the nation was to survive, took the only logical spiritual decision and removed them. Roman Catholicism in its authentic form is the absolute opposite of Talmudism. Sadly, the Cult of Edom which officially labelled itself as Anglicanism, was not simply a Reformist Protestant variation of Catholicism, it was rather, nothing short of a Talmudic cult. Embracing Divorce/adultery, and Usury/covetousness, the C of E embraced the essence of Talmudism. Putting the value of goods and money above the divine, the materialistic cult was the launching point for Capitalism and all the suffering that abomination was to cause.

Queen Elizabeth was in every way as evil as her namesake of modern times. It was during her reign that the pirate ships of her criminal navy terrorised the high seas, murdering and stealing for the benefit of the Crown. It was also during her reign that the Freemasonic Francis Bacon led a team of writers who wrote the plays attributed to the illiterate actor, William Shakespeare. These plays are a perfect example of political correctness, in that they falsified history in order to create a positive image of the ruling elite. These plays which are celebrated as masterpieces of English literature and art unfortunately also have obliterated knowledge of our true history. George Orwell's description of the revision of history with the truth disappearing down the memory hole was not merely a pseudo-prophetic analysis of the potential for manipulation by a coming elite, it was actually describing events which have already unfolded. The Elizabethan era saw the Establishment of the English Empire, and its accompanying Secret Police as created by the Satanist, John '007' Dee. We have been mis-educated in the school system to look back at this period as a great time for England. In truth it saw the birth of a despotic empire which murdered generations of Englishmen in the pirate navy, and the slave fields. If any point in history can be seen as the moment when the English became nothing more than cannon fodder and slaves to the ruling class, the Elizabethan era was that point. The English descendants of the heroic Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Celts never recovered from the break with Rome. They allowed a false jingoist patriotism to pervert them from being spiritually wholesome family-centred people, into Empire-worshipping materialistic bigots.

As England was turned from a natural society into a materialistic sewer, those who dissented were beaten into submission by a tyrannical Army and Police State. The natural reaction of the people should have been to revolt against an armed force killing our brothers and sisters. Instead the people rallied behind the troops at massacres such as Peterloo. When the Luddites who protested against the mechanisation of production and the destruction of childhood (with children dying in massive numbers in mills unfit for any human presence), were murdered by the establishment, the people did nothing. As the industrial era progressed and the English Empire became the British Empire, the common people rallied to the rag of their oppressors, proudly flying the Union Jack and celebrating the butchery in Ireland and across the globe. Press-ganging, slavery (first of Englishmen, then of the Irish, then of Africans) was treated as nothing to complain about, the rule of the elite via barbaric punishments such as exiling the hungry to prison colonies in Australia for the crime of trying to feed themselves and their families - these and other signs of the sickness of the elite were ignored, and later celebrated.

During the reign of the insane butcher, Victoria, and into the Twentieth Century the establishment fought a succession of Imperialistic wars of aggression, against the Dutch and German farmers (Baueren/Boers) in southern Africa, and against continental Europe in the Great War and Second World War. The people, so befuddled by generations of Judaeo-Anglicanism rather than refusing to murder their kin in foreign countries, raced to 'join-up' to increase the wealth of the Rothschild-Royal cabal. Those who had the wisdom to see that the wars were acts of pure evil, solely for the enrichment of an inhuman elite, were slandered as cowards and shot for refusing to participate in the carnage which destroyed the last vestiges of English decency.

The demise of England was finalised with a cowed and despondent public sheepishly embracing the post-war Europe and allowing themselves to be stampeded into the EU prison state. Why did they allow this? Simply because being the product of generations of psychological and physical abuse at the hands of a criminal elite, it was all they knew. Just as an abused child expresses its love for the abuser, so the abused English express their devotion to the Monarchy and their hatred for those who expose this diseased family and seek its overthrowal.

What is to be done for poor little England? Now that Rome herself has fallen to a variation of Anglicanism, reconversion of the nation to Catholicism is out of the question. Without a spiritual defence against Talmudic materialism, England cannot but remain lost. Pity our dead nation. Nothing short of a spiritual revolution akin to the great deed of 1290 will save us now - but this time the Monarchy will have to be destroyed to the last man, woman and child. They are not part of the solution, but a fundamental part of the problem.

From perpetual victim to worshipped saviour?

I came across an article which I recommend every one read. The article concerns the pariah state of Israel and how it has milked the Holyhoax to the point where people are heartily sick of hearing sob stories about poor innocent Jews being gassed, turned into lampshades, transported to a different concentration camps, being gassed again, turned into soap, then miraculously surviving to make a fortune selling their memoirs to a dumbed down Zionised world - and of course getting rich sucking the financial wealth of Europeans who were not even in the political establishments of the nations which built the transit camps, oops, extermination camps, in the first place!




Having exhausted the lie of the Shoah, the savage regime in occupied Palestine are now building up Iran as the new Nazi menace, and are set to destroy Iran in order to gain the financial support of a grateful gentile world, which will naturally drop all allegiance to Christianity as a mark of respect for the self-chosen people. Those who practice Judæo-Christianity will simply just drop the pretence that they are anything but Talmudists and simply jettison Jesus - no doubt joining in the blasphemous cat-calling about Him roasting over an open privy for eternity. Read the Talmud - this is what the book so beloved of the Œcumenical 'Judaism is equal with Christianity' lunatics states.



In the light of the USA and EU being ruled by Talmudists who may make token gestures of opposition to Israel, but in truth are of the same Zionist mould, it is important that everyone understands the game afoot here. The prize is nothing short of complete global domination and servitude for those outside the chosen cabal. Those who have taken the time to study the Protocols of Zion will know that the document is no forgery, but is rather a blueprint which is not far from being realised in its entirety.

The article concerning the slithering and posturing of the Talmudist-Sabattean cult who have captured and subverted Judaism can be found here: http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-golden-goose-of-holocaustianity-and-the-real-reasons-for-irana-phobia/

Fashion: another word for thought control

Fashion is a word which seems inoccuos enough. At face value, the manipulation of the vanity of people who are so vacuous as to seriously believe that how they look is the be-all and end-all of their existence, seems to be a sad indictment of the self-obsession of the individuals in question. However, the curse of fashion should not be so readily dismissed. Fashion goes beyond clothing, hairstyles, and other such material matters, and is indeed a problem which must be addressed by anyone who has the desire to understand how our oppressors control the societies we live in, and who wish to use this knowledge to undermine this control and free us all from this menace.

When we think of fashion, we tend to think only in terms of physical appearance. From the ridiculous flared trousers of the 1960s to the revolting tracksuits tucked into socks of the 2000's, it is easy to regard fashion as comical - but is it? Is it really a source of amusement that chronologically adult people dress themselves in the manner of circus performers at the command of an industry which revels in the ability to make allegedly sensible people reduce themselves to figures of ridicule - and to put themselves into debt in order to do so?

The phenomenon of fashion is worthy of study as it is clearly displays the strategy of our rulers in containing all the options available to the manipulated populace. For example, the mainstream fashion for girls may consist of the 'cheer-leader' or slutty look, with the fashion for those who reject the mainstream being the 'goth' or dyke look. Those who have the intelligence to see through the manipulation of the overt media are neatly herded into the camp of those who refuse to buy the designer label and TV-endorsed look. Far from expressing their individuality and freedom from the manipulators, they reveal that they too are falling in line with the mind controllers. Dressing in black and spiking one's hair may cause a reaction of indignation which serves to satisfy the desire to feel as if one is in rebellion against the system, but it is a completely controlled rebellion - ie no rebellion at all. When the punk group Crass stated that Punk was dead, they were referring to this manipulation - sadly the devotees of Crass, Conflict etc who confine their rebellion to clothing, music and repeating lyrics which they haven't bothered to examine, have fallen into the trap of becoming a part of the controlled opposition.

Fashion in music is an interesting arena. Unless one lives on a remote mountain top, with no radio or television, and no need to visit what passes for civilisation, one cannot escape exposure to what the establishment laughingly class as music. Nearly every shop, pub, cafe etc pumps out the music of the establishment. Whether it is the sexually explicit boy band and girl band material, or it is the controlled anger of the tailor-made false rebels, there is almost no break from the relentless aural assault on the senses of the passive listener.

What does it matter that the people have bread and circuses to keep them occupied? What else would the masses do if they didn't have their sensory pleasures catered for? Perhaps, just perhaps, they would begin to think for themselves and to see the world for how it really is, and not for how they have been conditioned to see it. What does is matter that pop culture is manufactured and all pervasive? Well, it matters precisely because it is all pervasive.

Pop music is targeted at children. Why? They are not economically independent, so the motive goes beyond material greed. Sexually explicit lyrics and calls to reject the authority of parents are not in the majority of songs played on the radio by mere chance. These lyrics are placed in the public realm deliberately. It is a much researched fact that repetition is a key method of brainwashing. Radio stations have a limited number of songs which they play over and over. The result is to place in the mind of the listener an attitude which is beneficial to the establishment. The ruling powers need to atomise society to the point where there are no familial ties and there is no respect between individuals and generations. What better way to destroy the natural order of a healthy society than to implant in the minds of its youth the idea that (as Mrs Thatcher stated in the 1980s) 'there is no society, only the individual'? Children sing about the primacy of the individual, the importance of being popular, about hatred of family, about love being an illusion, about meaningless anonymous sex with every man, woman, and animal being a positive thing. This self-brainwashing then transfers into reality - destroying the family, spreading selfishness and perversion, and giving authority to the establishment to the detriment of wholesome and natural structures.

Fashion goes beyond the material into every aspect of life. Religion for example has been subjected to the ceaseless assault of the politically motivated doyens of anti-morality. Before Vatican II, even Anglicans looked to homosexuality and abortion as examples of spiritual decay. Now the Anglican 'church' has openly homosexual priests, and has quietly dropped the last of the Christian principles it once held. Anglicanism has always been a heretical cult which has been a front for anti-Christian beliefs, so to see the facade drop is not that surprising. However the Holy Roman Church has mirrored its Anglican counterpart by embracing all manner of apostasy in order to appear 'with it' and fashionable. Only a few years ago one could expect to be given Hail Marys and Our Fathers to recite as penance for confessed sins, but that now has been dropped by the modernisers - it seems even God must conform to the whims of the dictators of fashion.

In politics, traditionalism and respect for country is laughed at - except when the establishment require patriotism to bolster their homicidal wars of aggression. This cynical manipulation of the feelings of the public is gently pushed by the 'news' media, who select which stories to tell to the public, and in reality create the news. At present it is fashionable to be pro-war, to 'support the troops' (the images of British soldiers murdering defenceless civilian in criminally occupied lands children and babies are hidden from the public gaze) and to love US President Obama (whose subservience to the globalist agenda and betrayal of the USA, perversion, drug addiction and blood lust never gets mentioned). Only a few years ago, flying the Union Jack in England was classed as racist - now failing to do so is unpatriotic. - so easily are the people swayed by the fear of being 'different' and out of step. In truth the Union Jack is an imperialist rag which when one understands its significance as a symbol of the Monarchy and their Zionist criminal brethren, deserves only to be burned whenever one comes across it.

Fashion has come to be an indicator of the power of the establishment. What is the reaction one gets when one is critical of the sexualisation of children, or the contrived immigration of unassimiable aliens for the benefit of the economic elite? Are the arguments in favour of morality, decency, protection of children, defence of family, the primacy of the spiritual over materialism, the halt to degeneracy and decadence etc... are these arguments met with reasoned discussion? No! Those who uphold morality and decency are immediately labelled as 'old-fashioned' are by the application of this label, all debate is prevented!

We need to confront this farce and reject the pressure to conform to fashion. We are right to defend our people and to expose the enemy. Being out of step and out of fashion with the sickening Zionist cult which is destroying the world is no source of shame, but rather of pride.

Fashion is just another word for thought control. Resist it.

Tyranny hidden in plain sight

To quote Thomas Jefferson, "every generation needs a new revolution."

At first glance this statement seems to be a noble and realistic assertion made by a man who personally experienced revolution and knew by experience that in order to protect hard-won freedoms, each generation must be ever vigilant and prepared to overthrow a new generation of oppressors. Thomas Jefferson was a signatory of the Declaration of Independence which marked the birth of the USA as an officially independent nation. He went on to become the third President of the USA. Jefferson was an architect of the American Constitution, and in every way an insider in the revolutionary movement which split the British colonies from rule by the British State. That is how official history has recorded the man, but as those who delve beyond the carefully prepared version of reality will know, what we are told to believe, rarely, if ever, has any substantial similarity with what really occurs.

Jefferson, as an insider, knew that the Colonial revolution was a sham and that power remained firmly in the hands of the Sabatteans in charge of the British Empire. As a close associate of the other Founding Fathers, he was linked to the highest Freemasons in the overseas British Establishment. It is claimed that he was not a Freemason himself, but he was certainly favourable to them. In all probability he was a secret Mason, although that is an issue which is deliberately left unclear by those who gain by maintaining he was not of the Craft.

The British Revolution in North America was a manipulated event which saw genuinely concerned Britons fighting a fratricidal war for ideals which were betrayed by those who led them into battle. The Loyalists were betrayed by an establishment which had no interest in maintaining overt control, and the Republicans were betrayed by fake revolutionaries who were linked by blood to the establishment, and remained in its employ throughout the struggle. The rival leaders were rivals in name only - they served a common purpose, to maintain the rule of the British Royal Family and their servants in the Rothschild financial dynasty. The blood spilt on both sides was real enough, as was the destruction of families and the implanting of hatred focused on one another rather than upon the string pullers of the pantomime in both Washington and London. Aside from the location, the scenario was repeated in an exact manner in Ireland.

Jefferson and his associates have been upheld in the American culture as heroes who framed the Bill of Rights to ensure that the enemies of humanity in the British Monarchy could never again oppress them. As can be clearly seen by current events in the USA under the presidency of Barack Obama, the Bill of Rights wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. Obama, alike to nearly (if not) all the Presidents of the USA is a blood relative of the British Monarchy. The USA did not achieve independence at all - the same bloodlines control it as always have. Those who died in the Revolution, died in vain.

The Jefferson quote, when considered in the context of the establishment insider who made it, is very interesting indeed. Can anyone doubt the veracity of the statement that each generation needs a new revolution, when one considers for whom Jefferson speaks?

Taking the Twentieth Century as a focus of study, can anyone deny that each generation was subjected to a revolution which strengthened the power of the oppressive establishment? The Great War of 1914-18 shattered the traditional structure of society and created a groundswell of hatred against the Capitalist structure. This was manipulated by the materialists into support of Communism which is pure Capitalism in disguise. Then came the rise of the anti-materialist doctrines in Europe which were crushed by the Zionist war machine in the 1939-45 conflict. The 1960s saw the sexual revolution which ripped the family apart and turned the natural form of society on its head with the fomenting of egocentric individualism, which rather than liberating the masses actually more greatly enslaved everyone. The 1980s saw the triumph of materialism with the selfishness of the Yuppie enshrined as a virtue, and compassion for one's indigenous brethren scorned. The century ended with a string of European wars and fake revolutions in which the openly Communist system was made to appear to collapse. The truth was that the rot of the Christian West was so far gone that it was ready for absorption into the Talmudic system. The substitution of Judaeo-Christianity for authentic Christianity (which is the absolute opposite of Talmudism) was completed in a series of generational revolutions, each a step more degenerate than the last.

Jefferson was a mouthpiece for the Globalist cabal. His statement was phrased in such a way as to give the appearance of defence of the common man against the tyranny of the elite, making the Globalist stooge appear a hero. This technique is common to the establishment. What better way to show one's power than to state one's objectives, and not only provoke no dissent, but in actuality, provoke applause and blind support. The gradualism of a revolution per generation is an old technique. Jefferson was espousing Fabianism before the term was officially coined.

Never underestimate the cunning of the enemy. Never take at face value anything said by people in positions of authority - to do so is to accept their lies and to pave the way for your own enslavement.