Answers to Imbeciles

I do not normally respond to the accusations of ne'er do wells, axe-grinders and others who enjoy spreading dis-info and making pointless and unworthy accusations. However, since I have changed tactics and begun posting blog articles to a wide variety of fora and social networks, I have become the focus of an orchestrated attack. Rather than answer the accusations individually - which is a massive waste of valuable time and effort, I shall answer the accusations here, and link my response as applicable.

The attacks I have received come in two main strands. Firstly, insinuations about how I earn a living, and secondly outright accusations that I am an advocate of the dissolution of the Church of England, which, it is maintained, is a bad thing. Thirdly, I am accused of anti-Semitism. I will answer these accusations in turn.

Firstly, there is the accusation that what I do for a living impacts upon what I write. Well, obviously, it does. It seems to me that a lot of the people who complain that I do work, are themselves shiftless, and happy to be doley scroungers. These people get their information from the tabloids, and the mainstream media. Other than 'news' from Establishment sources, those who rail against me tend to be Party activists, who receive politically-biased stories from the parties to which they belong. They take the propaganda they absorb at face value and do not question its validity. If the Party says that all the ills of the world are caused by people who eat bread, these activists will take it upon themselves to attack bakeries - whilst munching on a sandwich no doubt. Parties exist to spread propaganda, and if that happens to contain a reasonable degree of truth, then that is a happy coincidence. By using sources which are forbidden by the Party hierarchy, I am seen as a part of the enemy. In truth, by refusing to access all sources, Party activists are denying themselves the ability to see beyond the contrived version of reality the Establishment and the party create for them. They are going into the battle blindfolded - and hate anyone who refuses to cover his or her eyes and dares to search for the truth.

There does seem to be a bizarre train of thought which maintains that people who work can't be trusted. People who undertake menial tasks are seen as a threat, and God forbid anyone tries to climb out of the trap of minimum wage slavery and secure a position where he or she can provide for his or her family! It needs to be understood that by working in jobs which are not run-of-the-mill, people gain access to information which unemployed layabouts and unskilled wage-slaves cannot. I am fortunate in that my job is very interesting, and it does allow me to examine the workings of the State. To a limited degree I am privy to information which the public at large is not - and I use this first hand knowledge against the Establishment itself. We're not going to change a thing by shouting against the system from the outside - we need to get to its very core to do that. I make no apology for working, and for working my way into the beast. Only with knowledge of what 'they' are really doing, can 'they' be stopped

If all those who opposed the system were to get inside it, then it could be dismantled overnight. Attacking it from a position of ignorance, where the only information you have is what they want you to have, is to play a part in their pantomime - and to actively participate in furthering their agenda. This is beyond pointless - it helps reinforce the Establishment. If we are to defeat this monster, we have to know what we are fighting, and how best to go about it. Withdrawing our support by refusing to participate in their games is a key step. The system exists because people prop it up. Removing that prop is an essential part of the struggle.

The most repugnant aspect of the work-related attack upon me is the insinuation that I work for the Security Services, as some sort of 'double agent' - this is sheer lunacy! I am an individual who is aware of what is going on in the world around me, and can see that the traditional methods of opposition are controlled by the very enemy they purport to oppose. Those who cling to the Party System feel threatened by those who have escaped it and can see it for the farce that it always has been and always will be. I have noticed that it is common practice to refer to people who do not fit into the ideological boxes which have been constructed to keep the opposition in line, as State assets, informers, infiltrators etc. certainly such people do exist, and a careful eye must be kept out for them. But attacking anyone who doesn't toe the Party-line is sheer idiocy. Working with people who ideologically (and even personally) hate one another makes sense if the end result is positive for the restoration of freedom. The Establishment has constructed a web to keep us at each others throats. We must stop this childish behaviour and form alliances issue by issue to dismantle our common enemy. Thinking and acting as an individual is dangerous to those who make a living from the Party system, and those cannot see the reality beyond it. It doesn't make one a State plant - the notion is ludicrous and shows a lack of imagination and a degree of paranoia in the accuser.


As to the second accusation - that I oppose the Church of England. in a single word - Yes! I have written in detail about how until the Judaic takeover of Britain facilitated by the Royals, England was the staunchest Catholic nation of them all. Those who defend Judaeo-protestantism are pawns for the Establishment, who are blinded by an irrational hatred which doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Catholicism in its pure form is the strongest defence against Talmudism that Christians have. Ironically, after that there is really only Islam. England would be better off if it converted to Islam than it is being a tool of Protestantism, aka, Pharaseeism. And, I make no apology for that statement either.

Of the religions of Christianity, Islam and (Talmudic) Judaism, the oldest is Christianity. When the Jews broke the covenant by killing Christ, they established a new religion. The Talmud is the Holy book of the Judaic religion and negates everything Christianity stands for. Christianity and Judaism are as different as black is to white. Islam is interesting insofar as it attempts to synthesise elements of pre-Talmudic Judaism with Christianity, but rejects the divinity of Christ. Islam and Christianity differ in that for Muslims Jesus is a Prophet, who was followed by the last Prophet, Mohamed. For Christians, Jesus is the incarnation of God in human form, and His incarnation is the final stage of the development of the faith - Mohamed is not a part of the equation and is in fact an impostor. This is the great division. Both Christians and Muslims reject the Talmud, which is the work of Satan. This is why Judaeo-Christianity is such an abomination.

My objection to the Church of England rests entirely on its negation of Christianity. Anglicanism behaves very much like Talmudic Judaism. Its officials have argued over Biblical text to the point that they have reversed dogma. The Decalogue is infallible, yet only Catholics obey all Ten Commandments. The Church of England makes a virtue out of sin - it approves of abortion (Murder), divorce (Adultery/Dishonouring family), materialism (Covetousness/Theft) etc. It is the very foundation of the Capitalism which has destroyed the Spiritual unity of Europe, and as such is indefensible.

The third accusation is as ridiculous as the others, but needs to be addressed due to the serious legal implications. I state categorically and unequivocally here and now that I am not, never have been, never will be, and do not condone anyone who is, an anti-Semite.

I am opposed to Internationalism in any form which oppresses ordinary people. In its present incarnation the most inhumane form of Internationalism is Zionism. Zionism is an Imperialistic philosophy which has successfully tied itself to an entire people and to a religion. The idea that Zionism equates to Jewishness is an evil and sickening lie. (See http://endwhiteguilt.blogspot.com for examples of Zionist Lies). Zionism is a philosophy. Its adherents come from a variety of faiths and races, which they use to hide their real core unifying faith which is Sabatteanism (Satanism). This spiritual poison has polluted all religions, of which Judaism is but one victim. It has very much become an integral part of the British Establishment and its Church, which is an important reason for exposing Royal Family, the diseased faith of Anglicanism and defending its opponent, Traditional (Pre-Vatican II) Catholicism. Indeed opposition to Zionism is in reality defence of all faiths which reject Satanism.

Racially, many of the key players (such as the Rothschilds) are Ashkenazi - many but not all. Opposition to Zionism does not mean opposition to the Ashkenazim as a people. The shrieking of anti-Semitism at those who discuss the Ashkenazi origins of the Rothschilds and theri partners-in-crime, the British Monarchy, comes from a blurring of the classification of who is racially a Jew. The original Jews of the Old Testament were Semites. The Semites who still practice the Jewish faith are known as the Sephardim. The Ashkenazim, in contrast, are the descendants of the Khazars from Central Asia, who converted en masse at the command of their Monarchy. Claiming the Ashkenazim are Jewish by race is like claiming that all Canadians who practice Islam are Arabs due to Islam originating in Arabia. The Sephardim are routinely persecuted by the Ashkenazi government of Israel. The Palestinians whose land the Rothschilds stole and misnamed Israel practice Sabatteanism behind the mask of Judaism, and are racially Caucasian. They are simply not Jews in faith or by race! The true anti-Semites are the rulers of Israel. If anything, those of us who expose Zionism should be classed as philo-Semites, as we favour a freedom for Palestine and the restoration of Torah Judaism with the eradication of Sabattean Talmudism.

Of interest to British and kindred people, there is as wealth of research which points to the probability of the original Israelites (who were the people of the Old Testament) leaving the region and relocating in Western Europe, especially the British Isles. If this is so, then it is highly likely that a significant proportion of modern Britons are descended from the Abrahamics, and are, at least in part, Semites. (See http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/) This further weakens the label of anti-Semitism as that would in part be an attack on my own people. Much to the horror of the Judaeo-Protestants, and Royalist, I am an ardent defender of the true character of my people. This is why those who have swallowed the Establishment propaganda attack me on these grounds. If they would only think for themselves and not allow the Freemasonic Orange Odour, the Satanic Church of England, and the blood lust of Bnai Brit-ish materialist-Zionist-Imperialism, to dictate their thoughts, they would realise they are fighting for their own destruction, and that people such as myself are trying to defend them, even for all the animosity this brings.

I have wasted a lot of time and energy arguing these points with people who refuse to abandon their idols. This article will serve as an answer to those who wish to defame me. we don't have the luxury of time to bicker amongst ourselves. Hopefully those who worship the Monarchy and Anglicanism, and argue that we must defend Israel at all costs, will realise they are worshipping their greatest enemies - before it is too late.

War: What is it Good for? International Finance!

History is a catalogue of wars. In Europe, none was so devastating as the Great War of 1914-18, which differed from those which preceded it insofar as the result was not the transfer of power from one European nation to another, but the diminishing of power for all European nations, including those not actively involved. The Great War saw the dismemberment of many European nations, the merging of others, and the subjugation of many to Zionist control. All these factors contributed to the destabilisation of Europe and set the scene for the next war - which was, of course, the whole idea.

Official historians constantly tell us that the Great War was caused by the shooting of Franz Ferdinand. What they fail to mention is that he was not the only prominent figured to be killed in the run up to the outbreak of war. Europe was twitching with war fever, and had the murder of Ferdinand not been the excuse for the slaughter of the common people (and the financial gain of the Rothschilds et al), another excuse would have been very easily found. The War was a staged event, which sadly saw the real destruction of European civilisation, and the murders by official decree, of millions of people who were used to advance the Globalist agenda.

The only victor in any war is the cabal which funds it. Wall Street financed the Nazis and the Communists, and made a massive profit from the further destruction which followed within three decades of the end of the Great War. The Rothschilds, as financiers to the Globalist elite, have funded every side of every war, since the Napoleonic era. Before that, the Rothschild name may not be found, but the same bloodlines are apparent.

War is a con trick. A very sick and barbaric trick which involves blood sacrifice and theft to transfer power and wealth further away from the people whilst making them feel that the Establishment is acting for them out of duty and kinship. War isn't stupid - War is sick. War for defence is one matter, war for greed is another matter altogether.

Internationalism and capitalism have brought the world to a state where the military is used to advance corporate interests. The Armed Forces are the paid mercenaries of the Rothschilds and their Royal partners-in-crime. This is a very sorry state of affairs. The Zionist Kissinger referred to soldiers as 'stupid beasts' to be used as the political-financial power structure see fit. This is no mere insult; it is actually how they are being used. This makes a mockery of the raison d'etre of the common soldier.

People join the military in order to protect their own people. Certainly some misfits have ulterior motives, but in the main, people join for honourable reasons. They then find themselves being shipped all over the world to fight for big business and the Global super-power which is THE biggest threat to EVERY nation. Soldiers are enforcing embargoes which are starving to death civilians in Iraq (etc), protecting terrorists such as Tony Blair and the Queen, and protecting Opium fields in Afghanistan in order to flood the homeland with poison which kills our people and provides revenue to our enemies - this is not right, and shames all involved.

The military must be brought home. The US Army would be better deployed protecting the border with Mexico, eliminating anyone trying to illegally enter the nation that way - which is a form of invasion, and as such an act of aggression against US soil which merits, nay demands, the most serious consequences. The British Navy should be deployed in our seas sinking ships of immigrants and drug dealers. Likewise, the military forces of Europe should be deployed along the border keeping the Asiatics and Africans out. Transport aeroplanes which are bringing drugs into Europe ad America should be used to get the non-European population out of our homelands and by so doing helping to fight in the War of European Genocide, which has been going on since the 1940s (or earlier), but on OUR side, not on the side of the internationalist enemy which is using them to destroy us!

The military should be used to ensure our borders are secure, and the homogeneity of our people is protected. That is what they are for - to defend our peoples, not to advance multi-culti-rootless cosmopolitanism and the Zionist mafia who are pushing this agenda for their own purposes.

Our Own Worst Enemy

The plan for Global Government is not new. In one form or another it is a plan which has been around since not long after the last Global Government dissolved in the time before officially recorded and acknowledged history. For people living since that time, it has either been a utopian dream or a dystopian nightmare. Until now it has never felt like anything but a fantasy. Now it is only a very short time from becoming reality.

The proof of the imminence of the Global State is all around for everyone to see. It is testament to the power of those who control the media that through their mendacious technology they are able to at once announce their agenda, and at the same time convince people that there is no agenda, and that only lunatic 'conspiracy theorists' would believe there is one.

The influence of the media can be experienced in everyday conversation; such as the statements "we won the game/war/election" spoken by people who may be spectators of the media show, but not direct participants. Many people who have seen through the lie of democracy and know that neither the Party of Government nor the Party of Opposition can be trusted, still believe that change can come through elections! They see that Parliamentary Democracy is a sham, but are so conditioned that they cannot grasp that it isn't a simple case of the main parties being corrupt, but rather it is a fact that the system itself is so constructed as to corrupt everyone who participates in any effective manner. How so? By making effective participation possible only for those who have been compromised and accepted the geld of the Zionist mafia.

In recent times Nationalists across Europe have won many seats in the European Parliament. At the same time, the Lisbon Treaty has passed and the Copenhagen Treaty which will seal the fate of all of us will be in force by 2010 (weeks away). The Nationalists who have done well have included parties such as the British National Party which has become avowedly Zionist - making British insofar as it supports the Establishment, and Nationalist in no way at all. The UK Independence Party is likewise controlled by the Internationalist Zionist Faction Two. Parties which genuinely oppose European Union, and World Union have failed to achieve any relevant representation in Britain, if not in all Europe. The Great White Hope Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic has likewise proven himself a tool of the elite by allowing all opposition focus on himself, preventing a media-hypnotised population from acting for themselves until too late - when he simply 'gave up' the fight at precisely the moment his masters willed.

There are people who are awake to the futility of the party system who seek alternative means to halt the march to the Global Gulag. The Establishment has an answer to such people - just as it neatly fits people into nonsensical divisions of left and right, then uses the people who accept these labels to attack each other, it uses the same people to attack those who won't take any labels. The left-right division is a Masonic creation. It keeps natural allies apart on superficial grounds. People who won't play the game are a bigger threat to the Establishment than those who take their places like good little pawns in the grand chess game.

In the British Isles we have many political movements. Those who take the Masonic label of being 'left-wing' attack anyone who takes the label 'right-wing' - sometimes verbally, sometimes physically. The same applies in the other direction. The Establishment create these divisions in order to prevent a viable opposition forming. Globalism reduces everyone to the position of materialistic slaves, regardless of nationality, race, religion, sex, or whatever. the common enemy is Globalism, and its drive to turn every town in every country into a faceless characterless, cultural vacuum. They are succeeding because people who oppose this spend more time fighting one another than fighting the Global menace.

An example of the futility of the Party game is the meandering of activists from one Party to another. In the Nationalist arena, we are witnessing the BNP becoming ever more internationalist and Zionist, with the members who oppose this moving to other parties, such as the National Front. This is really a pointless exercise. With the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, parties such as the NF are redundant, and when the laws against Xenophobia are passed, they will be outlawed. All they serve to do is to contain the opposition by recycling activists from one group to another. The same applies to the 'Left'. The difference is that there is some unity amongst the 'Left' at least on the single issue of opposing Nationalists. That is about as far as the unity goes though.

Parties are not entirely pointless. They are reservoirs of activists, and as such, are home to people with a passion to put right the ills in society. Sadly this passion, rather than being nurtured, is stifled by the leadership. The priority of Party leaders is to win seats in elections. to do this, the policies must change to suit the media-driven political climate. This requires a succession of compromises, twists and turns, which will reduce any party to being a mirror image of the governing party it seeks to oust. Parties which retain ideological purity fail. Individuals within parties who refuse to adopt every policy change are removed. If the goal is to win elections at any cost, then yes, parties can do this. If the goal is to halt the Globalist Zionist destruction of our world, then by their very design, they must fail.

If political parties are such a waste of time, effort, and resources, then what can be done to halt our decline, and our enemies' advances? Of prime importance is to stop playing games we cannot win. The Party System is such a game. Winning elections does not produce power, elections are only won by those who have power - or to be more accurate by those who do the bidding of the real power which controls all elections. the only instances when the democratic process is worth joining is at the parish level. Parish Councils very often are undermanned, and all it takes to get on a council is to put your name forward. If you are unopposed, the seat is yours. Party affiliation will provoke interest and possibly opposition. standing as an independent individual avoids this - and allows the individual to speak freely.

What we must do is stop attacking one another. There are Police Informers and agents provocateur placed in all organisations. Whereas it is important to expose the shills, it is vital to not become paranoid and point the finger of accusation at anyone who has opinions which differ from one's own. Likewise the Left-Right nonsense must be dropped. There are good Nationalists who oppose internationalism due to love of their nation, not hatred of others; there are good Socialists who oppose materialism through an appreciation of the value of humanity over commerce; similarly many Anarchists take their opposition to Government from an awareness of the corruption inherent in the system, and the propensity of Government of any hue to oppress and manipulate the people. Refusing to cooperate with one another by compartmentalising our beliefs and the beliefs of others, is exactly what the Establishment need us to do. We do not have to agree on everything. Our common opposition to the Internationalist menace is reason enough to cooperate. The Zionist cabal is destroying the only world we have, and fighting amongst ourselves only helps them. United we are strong, divided, our efforts are pointless.

All that can be achieved by fighting for ideological purity is to ghettoise ourselves. We will achieve the purity we seek at the expense of losing any hope of protecting the ones we love from the Global Prison being built around us. Our children will have no future other than as slaves to materialism and cannon fodder for commerce. Whatever '-ism' we attach to ourselves, we will still be crushed under the heel of the Global Jackboot. Fighting silly street battles and Internet wars will do none of us any good. We need to unite if only to stop the completion of the Internationalist Empire. After that we may fight against one another again, if we still haven't learnt the value of understanding and appreciating our individual strength and worth.

In practical terms we must take the fight to where it matters - to everywhere we can. We must speak to everyone of every political hue. We must agitate on every forum, every social network, in every workplace, and every interaction. We are losing this fight because we are acting as players in a pantomime not or our making. We need to exit the stage and take over the reality beyond the theatre. And we need to do this now. 'Tomorrow' will be too late.

Honour the Victims of War - Punish the Perpetrators

The 11th November, marks Armistice Day - the day when the Great War (subsequently known as the First World War), formally ended. The exact timing chosen for the Armistice was 11 o'clock on the 11th day of the 11th Month (11/11, 11). Does it strike anyone as odd that a war could end in such a numerologically significant manner? How was this possible? Simply because that is how the end to the ritual slaughter of the Great War was planned.

The annual spectacle of Remembrance Day ostensibly commemorates the sacrifice of the men and women who died fighting for the survival of the British Empire in the War of 1914-18. Subsequent wars involving the British military (with the exception of the 1948 War in Palestine) have been added to the Great War, as a focus for contemplation. Alike to every almost officially sanctioned event, the truth behind the ceremony is very different to that which we are made to believe.

The Great War of 1914-18 was an exercise in imperialism. Great Britain and her Empire were not threatened in any manner by any foreign power. The men who rushed to enlist were victims of hysterical jingoist propaganda. As the war progressed, the much promised quick victory over continental Europe was exposed as a political lie. After it became impossible to continue to romanticise the murder by the State of Britain's idealistic young men, (who were marched into the bullets of a similarly brain-washed and coerced opposition army), conscription was introduced. Brave men who refused to be cannon fodder were murdered in cold blood by the establishment, whilst those who were forced under threat of execution to fight, were ritually butchered as agreed by the monsters of the Royal Family in London and Berlin.

The Great War was won in 1917 by Germany, which offered to restore the battered land of Europe to its pre-war status. However, the fully plutocratic establishment of Great Britain refused to accept this chivalrous offer and instead sought to extend the war by enticing the USA to join on Britain's side. To achieve this, the nation of Palestine was promised to International Zionism. The American media were mobilised to push stories of German barbarity to the American people in order to so enrage them that they would support the insanity of a foreign war for the benefit of no-one other than a self-chosen elite.

At the end of the Great War, the financial elite were given control over Palestine, and the countries which had stood in the way of International Finance were handed over to the same mafia who now had a foothold in the Middle East. The Christian nation of Russia, which formed the frontier between Europe and the non-White world, was handed over to asiatics with their ancestry rooted in Khazaria. The heroic Russians fought back against this alien take-over of their nation, but were defeated by the financial might of the Khazars in London and Washington who provided every possible assistance to ensure their brethren maintained control of the enslaved Russian Nation. Attempts to install similar regimes across Europe in order to completely destroy Christian Europe, by imposing Communist fronts in the Orthodox and Catholic nations, to match the Capitalist fronts in the Judaeo-Protestant lands they already controlled, had to be delayed. Interestingly, the Romanov dynasty which had resisted the advance of Zionism were ritually murdered, but the Hapsburgs who acted in concert with the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas to create the War in the first place, received no such treatment.

The Great War was labelled as the 'war to end all wars'. This was, of course, nonsense.

The failure of the Khazar elite to capture all of Europe necessitated another war. This was accomplished using the illegitimate Rothschild, Adolf Hitler, and Soviet plants in the NSDAP hierarchy such as Martin Bormann. Conning the German people with promises of restoring to the Reich the territories stolen from it by the Zionist victors, the patriotic German people were pushed into an unwanted war, from which all that was gained was the further dismemberment of the nation and the slaughter of all who had a healthy appreciation of the need for an undying defence of faith, folk and fatherland. Unbelievably, in Britain, Oswald Mosely ordered members of his British Union of Fascists to murder fellow Europeans at the demand of the Zionist London regime! By associating the opposition to Globalism with an opposition to all things Jewish, the Zionist elite (who are nearly entirely non-Semitic) managed to instill in the people of Europe a suicidal worldview which categorised as the natural desire for National Freedom and Social Justice as synonymous with the desire for anti-Semitic genocide. The fact that the Holyhoax was a barefaced lie thought up by the diseased minds of Zionist Washington, Moscow and London, in no way weakened this Pavlovian linkage of thought, which has become the death-wish of Europe worldwide.

Alike to the false promise of the Great War that it would be a war to end all wars, the Second World War was sold to the people as a war to liberate Poland (which itself immorally occupied land alien to it). Poland remained subject to the control of the Khazar USSR for nearly half a century before experiencing a brief period of freedom, followed by absorption into the Khazar EU. Former Polish territory is still administered by other nations. The Second World War strengthened by Zionist move to Globalism and all who died, like those who died in the Great War, died in vain.

Since 1945, the British military have been involved in wars across the world. In many they have been publicly humiliated as the Empire has collapsed to the point that aside from a few rocks scattered across the globe, the British nation has been reduced to the British Isles alone (and not even to all of them). The same elite control the interests which were formally known as the Empire, but they operate behind the scenes rather than overtly. Now, Britain herself has been absorbed by the European Union, and the age old dream of the Khazars to occupy all of Europe has been realised. Khazars control every nation of the EU, Eurasia, North America, and elsewhere. This is what the wars of the Twentieth Century achieved.

Now, in the early Twentyfirst Century, we have the lie of the War on Terror. TV-viewing retards have been convinced that for the first time ever (and not since) steel-framed buildings have collapsed to dust due to fire (I wish I was joking, but this is the fable), and that a tiny group of Muslim extremists are responsible. Those who know this is absurd are herded by the likes of Alex Jones into believing that '9/11 was an inside job' - safely venting their anger at political puppets who serve the real Zionist culprits who control the establishments of the EU, USA, etc. This has led to the ongoing wars in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia, in which British, American and allied servicemen are murdering civilians on an industrial scale. In Iraq alone the death-toll is approaching two million - people murdered in their own countries for the crime of living in territory with resources, artifacts, and strategic importance coveted by the Globalists.

In Afghanistan, the British and American military are guarding the poppy fields to ensure that our streets are awash with the poison of Heroin, which destroys individuals, families, and entire communities. These same soldiers are treated as heroes when they parade in British and American towns. How are they heroes? What is heroic about murdering people in their homes, enforcing food and medicine embargoes to kill civilians (especially babies) with malnutrition and disease, and with helping the establishment to produce drugs which are wrecking the home nations? The heroes are the men and women of the (Afghani and Iraqi) Resistance who are fighting to remove the forces of occupation from their lands. These people are labelled by the Zionist media lie machine as Terrorists.

On Remembrance Day we must remember the victims of war - the civilians butchered in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Palestine, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Hamburg, and too many other places; the soldiers who naively volunteered to enlist in the military in wars which served no national interest, and which in fact invited attack by people reacting to the actions of soldiers in uniforms bearing our flags; the conscripts who fought against their will, the conscientious objectors and deserters who were murdered for doing the right thing and refusing to fight for the Khazar elite. We must also remember those responsible for war - the Zionist-Plutocratic-Masonic-Royal Establishment; the psychopathic volunteers who enjoy killing for money; the politicians and media who push the lie that we must 'support our troops' in these insane and criminal campaigns.

The Armed Forces should exist for the sole purpose of defending the Nation from all who threaten it - be they financial parasites, Monarchists, Sabbatean Cultists, unassimiable immigrants or those who advocate imperialism and atrocities on our own or foreign shores. The most fitting tribute to the victims of war is to campaign for the military to be brought home, and for the war criminals in or out of uniform to be executed. Never again must our military be reduced to the role of paid butchers in service of our real enemies. The role of the military should be to defend the nation from enemies domestic and foreign who threaten our homeland - nothing else. National Freedom and Imperialism cannot coexist. No more wars for Zionist Profit and Empire.

Remember, remember, the 5th of November

Today in England is the festival known as Bonfire Night. This festival involves the usual English traditional celebrations such as eating junk and drinking too much, but unlike other festivals it has not degenerated into a big shopping bonanza. Instead, it continues in much the same way as it has for centuries, with processions of people in historic garb, solemnly taking the effigy of Guy Fawkes through the streets to the steady beat of the drum, finally arriving at a bonfire, upon which it is placed and set alight. This is followed by a fireworks display.

Guy Fawkes hailed from Yorkshire - the historic county of Northern England which was also home to the much loved Robin Hood. Alike to Robin Hood, Guy Fawkes was a revolutionary who sought to help the people of England by combating the anti-Christian despots who had usurped power from the indigenous population. Unlike Robin Hood, the truth of whom is shrouded in mystery and folklore, Fawkes is well documented. He heroically fought against the despicable Stadholders in the Spanish Netherlands in an attempt to liberate the people from the tyranny of Protestantism. It was in the Netherlands that Fawkes became an expert in the use of explosives - an expertise which made him a key part in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

In 1605 England was ruled by King James I. This was the monarch responsible for the blasphemous King James Bible in which it is stated that Kings rule by Divine Right. This Bible has become the most widely used Protestant Bible and is so far removed from the real Christian texts that it sits better alongside the Talmud than it does the teachings of Christ. In 1604, King James attacked the Catholics of England in such strong terms that it became certain that the persecution of Christians by the Protestant heretics would be increased beyond any tolerable limits. This fear would prove to be prophetic as within the century came the rule of Oliver Cromwell - the most evil man to rule England since William the Bastard.

Driven to desperate measures, the Gunpowder Plotters led by Robert Catesby set out to bomb the Palace of Westminster during the State Opening of Parliament whilst the hated King James and his diabolical family were present, alongside the Members of Parliament, the Nobility, the Aristocracy and the entire leadership of the Anglican-Satanic Cult. Had the Plot been successful, England would have been freed from the nightmare it had endured since Elizabethan times, and could have returned to its true path as a beacon for Christianity and a bulwark against the power of Judaic-usury. Sadly, well-meaning plotters informed their friends in Parliament of the need to keep away from the building on that fateful day - and these lackeys of the establishment betrayed them to the Monarch's Secret Police. The result was the arrest of the Plotters and the continuation of the anti-Christ rule over England.

To his eternal credit, even though Guy Fawkes suffered the most unimaginable tortures, this true hero refused to name any of his co-conspirators, save only the ones he knew were already dead. Sentenced to be 'Hung, Drawn and Quartered', Fawkes cheated the sick and depraved blood lust of the Monarchy by hurling himself from the hangman's scaffold, breaking his neck - thus depriving the enemies of humanity from ripping him apart whilst still alive.

Guy Fawkes will forever be remembered as the man who attempted to destroy the rule of King James and those around him who we would now call Zionists. To quote the popular rhyme :

"Remember, remember, the Fifth of November,
Gunpowder, (t)reason and plot,
I see no reason why gunpowder treason,
Should ever be forgot."

Well said. Let us forever remember this honourable gentleman and his comrades who fought to save us from those he foresaw would enslave us all.

Guido Fawkes - Presente!

Double Speak in action

Political Correctness was designed in the Soviet Union to control how people express themselves, and by extension, how they think. The theory is quite simple - control what words people are allowed to use, manipulate the meanings attached to individual terms, and by so doing, limit the possible linguistic expression available, thus preventing dissent by removing the ability of the individual to put into words any feelings of opposition to the establishment agenda. By controlling language, the theory maintains that the ability to think in a manner which is dangerous to the ruling regime, will become impossible, and thus opposition in any tangible form will become impossible.

This is, of course, complete nonsense! People do not think with words, but with images (consider your memories - they are like films inside your head and not akin to the words in a book). However, the politically correct mafia have such faith in their ideology that they undertake their assault on language with the zeal of unbridled fanaticism. They are damaging our language, and in fact every language which has come under their scrutiny. With regards to English in particular, they are so distorting the meaning of words as to make the language barely intelligible to those who are not fully cognisant of the language as it should be used. Whether it is the niggling use of the word 'they' (plural) in place of he or she (singular), or the use of 'she' to refer to a man who has a mental illness and has had himself castrated in the bizarre belief that by having no penis he will magically become a woman, (rather than a mutilated man, which is what he is), the English language in its every day use is becoming absurd. Foreigners trying to learn English must find this corruption of the language confusing and irritating.

A serious result of the politicisation of the language is the perceived danger of being ridiculed for having opinions which are out of fashion (i.e. forbidden by the media manipulators), or being unpopular and seen as an elitist for using English in a manner which doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator. It has become a badge of honour to speak and act in the way of a mental retard. Using words of more than one syllable invites reactions such as "what's up wiv you mate, dya swallow a dickshunairee?" suggesting that it is a bad thing to seek self-improvement through the acquisition of knowledge and the ability to effectively communicate using the vocabulary suited to an adult level. This, of course, is the whole point of political correctness - to 'dumb down' the population to the point where they are barely human and are thus more easily controlled, like the cattle they have become.

It is routine for the commissars of political correctness to claim that not only does political correctness not exist(!), but if it did, it would be a benevolent phenomenon, which only 'haters' and bigots could object to. By this simple ploy, all criticism of the manipulation of society is silenced - well, that is the idea at any rate. Anyone who is not totally submersed in the propaganda system which passes for the news and entertainment media cannot fail to see that the way ideas and events are presented is highly controlled, and nothing at all is left to chance which the media manipulators can control.

The English language, like all living languages, goes through changes, with some words reversing their meanings over and over. With regards to everyday words which have no real cultural value, this is of little importance. The natural development of the language contrasts with the PC agenda in that it is orchestrated by the establishment and pushed at every level. The only comparable example, (in times other than those of conquest), of the high level distortion of English in our past is that of the Elizabethan era, in which the Freemasonic Francis Bacon created a whole array of new words, to knit together the various dialects of England into a unified national language. At the time, 'English' spoken in the North was as different from that of the South as Plat Deutsch is to Bairisch for our Anglo-Saxon brethren in Germany in our day. Defenders of the English State will argue that Bacon's deeds helped forge a national culture, in place of the regional cultures which preceded it. Whether one considers this a good or bad thing is an issue in itself. Personally, I find abhorrent the destruction of our indigenous organic cultures in the service of the imperialism of the ruling elite, but in Bacon's defence, the vocabulary of the enhanced language was greatly increased. Try as one may, it is impossible to find any positive consequences of the modern Political Correctness sickness.

The distortion of words is important insofar as words connected with our culture and heritage when lost amount to a break with our ancestors. The old systems of measurements for example, are being lost in order to create a single global system. This would not be a problem but for the fact that the traditional units of measurement link us with the past and help us understand the truth of our world, not the lies given us by court historians. For example, the English Mile is an exact division of the measurement of the circumference of the planet. It was created after the Earth was measured, proving that our ancestors were not savages, but were in fact highly intelligent and technologically advanced. The Politically Correct lie of Evolution maintains that humans came from monkeys, who in turn came from primordial slime, which came out of the big bang when gases just happened to explode (although where these gases came from isn't explained). The demise of the English Mile removes the link to the ancient measuring system which proves that our forebears were not apes, but people - like us, nay better than us. The Materialist-Darwinist lie of Evolution is a key point of the PC argument. They claim we are all 'the same' and 'equal' and they justify this with the ludicrous theory of evolution, which is taught in schools as fact. The theory is so full of holes as to be nonsensical. Giving us the culturally and historically neutral Kilometre in place of the ancient Mile adds validity to their theory by removing evidence from human knowledge which proves that advanced civilisations were in place at least 100,000 years ago, when the Darwinist-Communist-PC liars would have us living in trees and eating bananas.

Alongside the twisting of words and the attack on basic grammar used by the PC mafia, is the assault on intelligence, with the focus upon trivia as a new source of wisdom. Turn on the TV or Radio or read a 'Newspaper' and you will be bombarded with stories of which 'celebrity' is having sex with which 'sports star', or some other such nonsense. People shout and scream like inmates of a lunatic asylum at contestants on game shows, and is if that isn't bad enough, they congratulate one another and take pride in the fact that they have learnt every tiny piece of irrelevant information that the mass media have chosen to spoon feed them. Never mind that they are sleep-walking slaves trapped in an economic system which could destroy their lives in an instant, no, they can repeat the tedious details which they have swallowed form years of obediently devouring what their masters have provided for them in the circus of TV living. This 'pride' should be a sense of pride for the establishment as it indicates just how successful they have become at controlling the masses.

The 'news' media is full of propaganda in support of the criminal wars of aggression being fought by the unthinking robots who are labelled as soldiers, on behalf of the globalist elite. There are decent soldiers who are refusing to fight and are quitting the Armed Forces in disgust at being used not to protect their nations, but to destroy obstacles to the Global Superstate which is step-by-step absorbing ALL nations. These men and women who refuse to serve are the true heroes, not the scum who blindly obey orders and murder civilians of all ages and foreign soldiers and members of the Resistance protecting their own people in their own lands. Ask any flag-waving drooling TV viewer what is going on in the world, and the reaction will be a repetition of whatever that dumbed-down individual has been exposed to. Even those who can see that politicians lie will still parrot support for 'our boys' - stating that we have to support the troops even though they are butchering the people of foreign lands and paving the way for their international counterparts to do the same to us, right here. Sickeningly, people cheer in the streets when these paid psychopaths march in the streets freshly returned from their tours of occupied lands, their flesh only recently scrubbed clean of the blood of the innocents they have hacked to pieces for the Global leadership. Such is the power of the media to make otherwise intelligent people speak and act as morons.

The greatest victory of the pushers of the Political Correctness machine is that people see the ridiculous examples of men in frocks being called women, or men 'marrying' men, or quota systems giving work to people unsuited to particular jobs solely because they fit a stereotype which the PC mafia maintain doesn't matter! By seeing the ludicrous and pointless, people focus upon the irrelevant, and fight against side-issues. This keeps attention away from the bigger picture and allows the Globalists to advance their agenda unhindered. The likes of Common Purpose are seen as liberal extremists and political crackpots, precisely because the real power behind them want them to be seen as such. They are puppets in a pantomime show and we have been directed to watch them, whilst all the while our hidden masters are sending their agents amongst us to pilfer from our pockets and steal us of our heritage, our present, and our future.

England: Land of Evil

The English are a hard-pressed people. In many ways we as a people are an example of what the globalists have in store for the world. We have been manipulated by our rulers to the point that we take pride in what has been done to us, and what we have done to others at the behest of our rulers. In true Orwellian style, we have come to love Big Brother.

How did this sorry state come to pass? How did the people of the Norse Eddas, mingled with Rome, Germania, and the truly magickal people of the Celtic nation, become so subservient to the alien presence that not only do we not revolt against our oppressors, but we actively persecute those who can see the reality beyond the pantomime? How did the English become the engine of the globalist machine which is destroying every people and culture on the planet, replacing them with a sub-human mass of organic robots, with no allegiance to anything except self, materialism and survival?

To understand how debased the English have become, we need to go back to a time when being English was a badge of honour. The nation of England was born in 986 with the fusion of the smaller nations which had occupied the land up to that time. England existed as a sovereign land until 1066 when the 'Norsemen' invaded. Led by William the Bastard, the Norman conquest saw England reduced to a vassal of a foreign power. The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom which had gradually been forged with the admixture of related European peoples was subjected to a new regime, which rather than blending with the general population, imposed its will by means of harsh persecution and butchery of all who refused to accept the new overlords. The Feudal System was modelled along Talmudic lines to suit the new rulers who were Christian in name only, if at all. This tragedy in the history of the English was unparalleled in its brutality by any invasion prior or since. Even the horrors inflicted upon the Druids by the Romans paled in comparison with the slaughter unleashed by the Normans and those who collaborated with them.

Following the Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon England was changed forever. The traditional organic moot system of government was replaced by the feudal system. Whereas before, leaders ruled with the consent and approval of a cooperative people, under the new system, rule was imposed by fear and the use of barbarity and cruelty of truly Biblical proportions. It was with the arrival of the cosmopolitan Norman ruling elite that the divisive class system was introduced. The spiritual quality of the nation was undermined with the wholesale butchery of the clergy. The Anglo-Saxon language was likewise attacked, with French being imposed as the official language of commerce and government. The French tongue trickled into the vernacular of the masses creating the hybrid language which evolved into the English spoken today.

The hatred for the French-speaking elite has been passed down through the generations in folklore. Anyone who knows the story of Robin hood will know that he was a native of Yorkshire who led raids upon the lackeys of the establishment, and then redistributed the wealth thus obtained amongst his impoverished Anglo-Saxon kinsmen. Across the channel in France, the same hated establishment so persecuted the native population that in time they rose up and beheaded those who ruled them and claimed to be French. In England, a similar uprising did not occur. A hatred of all things French bedded into the popular culture, which was ironic, as the real French were as much victims of the establishment oppressors as were the English - in classic divide and rule style, the focus of animosity was targeted against a linguistic group, not against the true enemy who happened to speak their language. Certainly, the Royal Family in England were deposed, but during the short-lived Commonweal of Cromwell, the tyranny of the state was accelerated to the point that the hated Royals were given back the position of authority which they had enjoyed before the revolt. The ruling class did not experience the same justice as their brethren across the Channel and for them the English Republic was but a brief break in overt control. In truth, the rulers of the Republic were from the same families as beforehand, thus there was no break in the rule by the Royal despots at all.

In the run up to the regime of the puppet Republic, the Royals ensured that their control was extended to the farthest reaches of the nation. Contrary to the romantic myth, the Royals were hated by the general population who viewed them as outsiders who had stolen the Crown from the indigenous rulers. The nation of England following the Norman invasion, has not to this day seen a true Anglo-Saxon on the Throne.

In the first English Civil War - a War which has become known as the War of the Roses - the 'French' elite fought against their 'Welsh' cousins for mastery of England. The bloodshed was such that to this very day there is animosity between the counties of Yorkshire (the White Rose) and Lancashire (the Red Rose). The War served only to advance the agenda of the Royal dictators. Foolish Englishmen from Yorkshire and Lancashire still hold a burning hatred for one another for the crimes committed by the rulers they still champion. It is one thing to honour our dead ancestors, but an entirely different matter to revere the butchers whose blood lust and power-mania was the sole cause of their deaths. With the defeat of the Plantagenets, the ruling power passed to the house of Tudor. The Tudor dynasty hailed from Wales which although a nation in its own right, has been ruled by the English for centuries. Ironically although the true Britons were pushed into Wales by the waves of European invaders, the bloodline of the Tudors was tainted by blood from further afield - the same taint as the 'french' rulers they deposed. The Tudors were as harmful to the English as the faux-French monarchs they replaced.

Akin to all the despots who have ruled England, Henry VIII was a cruel and twisted tyrant. His most famous crime was splitting the Church. A man obsessed with his own selfish interests, this gluttonous oaf was a serial adulterer and murderer. Married to Catherine of Aragon, he allowed his lust for Ann Boleyn to go before the needs of the nation he ruled over. Confronted by a woman who refused to allow her body to be used as he saw fit in an adulteress manner, the sex-obsessed egomaniac ordered his lackeys to annul his marriage - in spite of the fact that there were no acceptable grounds for this. The Pope had no choice but to excommunicate Henry the heretic. The despicable Monarch soon tired of his new 'wife' and in due course ended his officially sanctioned cohabitation ('marriage'). Ann Boleyn was, unlike Catherine of Aragon, not the daughter of a powerful Monarch, so he had no need to fraudulently annul the arrangement - he simply had her beheaded - ostensibly for incestuous adultery which ironically was classed as treason. Henry VIII went on to divorce another 'wife', and behead another. Such was the glorious beginning of the Church of England.

Henry VIII may have been the man responsible for rift between the English Monarchy and the Roman Catholic Church IN England, but it was his daughter, Elizabeth, who created the Church OF England as a separate entity. The entire justification for the founding of the Church was to legitimise the adultery, divorce and remarriage of Henry VIII. From this one event followed centuries of persecution of Catholics who held true to the Christian faith and rejected the Satanic Cult which had supplanted it in England. It is a sad indictment of the character of the English that the majority betrayed their faith and adopted the anti-Christ cult of the Royalty. To be fair, there was stiff resistance in the early days of the C of E, and it took the insane tortures ordered by the establishment (Royal and Cromwellian) to finally break the Catholic Church in England.

Stripped of its spiritual defence, England was open for the return of the descendants of the Talmudists who had been expelled in 1290 by the Catholic King, Edward Longshanks. For all his ills, the King acted in the manner of a true Christian and realising that the Talmudists could not be allowed to stay in England if the nation was to survive, took the only logical spiritual decision and removed them. Roman Catholicism in its authentic form is the absolute opposite of Talmudism. Sadly, the Cult of Edom which officially labelled itself as Anglicanism, was not simply a Reformist Protestant variation of Catholicism, it was rather, nothing short of a Talmudic cult. Embracing Divorce/adultery, and Usury/covetousness, the C of E embraced the essence of Talmudism. Putting the value of goods and money above the divine, the materialistic cult was the launching point for Capitalism and all the suffering that abomination was to cause.

Queen Elizabeth was in every way as evil as her namesake of modern times. It was during her reign that the pirate ships of her criminal navy terrorised the high seas, murdering and stealing for the benefit of the Crown. It was also during her reign that the Freemasonic Francis Bacon led a team of writers who wrote the plays attributed to the illiterate actor, William Shakespeare. These plays are a perfect example of political correctness, in that they falsified history in order to create a positive image of the ruling elite. These plays which are celebrated as masterpieces of English literature and art unfortunately also have obliterated knowledge of our true history. George Orwell's description of the revision of history with the truth disappearing down the memory hole was not merely a pseudo-prophetic analysis of the potential for manipulation by a coming elite, it was actually describing events which have already unfolded. The Elizabethan era saw the Establishment of the English Empire, and its accompanying Secret Police as created by the Satanist, John '007' Dee. We have been mis-educated in the school system to look back at this period as a great time for England. In truth it saw the birth of a despotic empire which murdered generations of Englishmen in the pirate navy, and the slave fields. If any point in history can be seen as the moment when the English became nothing more than cannon fodder and slaves to the ruling class, the Elizabethan era was that point. The English descendants of the heroic Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Celts never recovered from the break with Rome. They allowed a false jingoist patriotism to pervert them from being spiritually wholesome family-centred people, into Empire-worshipping materialistic bigots.

As England was turned from a natural society into a materialistic sewer, those who dissented were beaten into submission by a tyrannical Army and Police State. The natural reaction of the people should have been to revolt against an armed force killing our brothers and sisters. Instead the people rallied behind the troops at massacres such as Peterloo. When the Luddites who protested against the mechanisation of production and the destruction of childhood (with children dying in massive numbers in mills unfit for any human presence), were murdered by the establishment, the people did nothing. As the industrial era progressed and the English Empire became the British Empire, the common people rallied to the rag of their oppressors, proudly flying the Union Jack and celebrating the butchery in Ireland and across the globe. Press-ganging, slavery (first of Englishmen, then of the Irish, then of Africans) was treated as nothing to complain about, the rule of the elite via barbaric punishments such as exiling the hungry to prison colonies in Australia for the crime of trying to feed themselves and their families - these and other signs of the sickness of the elite were ignored, and later celebrated.

During the reign of the insane butcher, Victoria, and into the Twentieth Century the establishment fought a succession of Imperialistic wars of aggression, against the Dutch and German farmers (Baueren/Boers) in southern Africa, and against continental Europe in the Great War and Second World War. The people, so befuddled by generations of Judaeo-Anglicanism rather than refusing to murder their kin in foreign countries, raced to 'join-up' to increase the wealth of the Rothschild-Royal cabal. Those who had the wisdom to see that the wars were acts of pure evil, solely for the enrichment of an inhuman elite, were slandered as cowards and shot for refusing to participate in the carnage which destroyed the last vestiges of English decency.

The demise of England was finalised with a cowed and despondent public sheepishly embracing the post-war Europe and allowing themselves to be stampeded into the EU prison state. Why did they allow this? Simply because being the product of generations of psychological and physical abuse at the hands of a criminal elite, it was all they knew. Just as an abused child expresses its love for the abuser, so the abused English express their devotion to the Monarchy and their hatred for those who expose this diseased family and seek its overthrowal.

What is to be done for poor little England? Now that Rome herself has fallen to a variation of Anglicanism, reconversion of the nation to Catholicism is out of the question. Without a spiritual defence against Talmudic materialism, England cannot but remain lost. Pity our dead nation. Nothing short of a spiritual revolution akin to the great deed of 1290 will save us now - but this time the Monarchy will have to be destroyed to the last man, woman and child. They are not part of the solution, but a fundamental part of the problem.