Swine Flu Scare - Swine Flu Scandal

Turn on the Radio or Television, open a Newspaper, and you will be bombarded by stories about the outbreak of Swine Flu which, you will be told, is set to devastate the planet, killing millions. What is the reality? Well, as anyone who cares to look a little more deeply into the world around them than just accepting the official version of events will already suspect, the stories and reality are very different. The propaganda is designed to instill fear and unthinking panic. Take a deep breath, step back from the illusion being pushed by the establishment media and you will see that events are worlds apart from what we are being told.

According to the mass media, as of yesterday, 29th April, over 150 people have died worldwide of Swine Flu. However, this has been rejected by the World Health Organisation, which has recorded just 7 deaths. Vivienne Allan, of the WHO Patient Safety Programme stated on ABC Radio (29.4.9):

“Unfortunately that [150-plus deaths] is incorrect information….That figure is not a figure that’s come from the World Health Organisation and, I repeat, the death toll is seven and they are all from Mexico.”

The WHO has confirmed a total of 89 cases worldwide - 40 in the Latin America, 26 in Mexico, 6 in Canada, 2 in Spain, 2 in Great Britain and 3 in New Zealand. The 7 fatalities are included within the figures for Mexico. The 2 people in Britain with flu are classed as not being seriously ill, but rather a bit poorly.

So, what is this ‘Swine Flu’ which we are all being conditioned to be terrified of?

According to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Swine Flu is an influenza type A H1N1 virus which although unpleasant for pigs, rarely transfers to humans, and in the cases where it does, this only occurs where people are in very close proximity to the animals. Thus, a pig farmer would be at much greater risk than a town dweller, and then only at high risk should he be in intimate contact with the porker. The flu is not transmitted person-to-person. Living conditions in the affected region of Mexico cannot be considered comparable to conditions in Europe, or for that matter in the rest of Mexico. Although death does occur with influenza, this is incredibly rare. In the overwhelming majority of cases, symptoms are similar to the common cold and are best dealt with by isolating oneself and resting. The media scare-mongering is just that.

Alongside the irresponsible reporting of the media, who will repeat any salacious lie in order to sell their product, politicians are jumping on the misery and fear bandwagon. EU health commissioner, Androulla Vassiliou issued a warning on Monday 25th April against travelling to North and Central America. The British Foreign Office followed suit . The motive behind politicians issuing edicts is to reinforce the fear factor by giving the media a level of official governmental backing. Many people who are inclined to treating the media with a pinch of salt are less cynical when it comes to the Government. The much vaunted use of the so-called Cobra Committee is nothing but an instrument of psychological warfare.

The Swine Flu scare is just another in a series of contrived panics. In 1995-97 Britain had the BSE scare. We were told that up to 10 million Britons would be infected and die of a horrendous debilitating sickness. The nation’s farms were decimated as entire herds of cattle were slaughtered and farms forced to sell out to property developers and international businesses. The millions of dead Britons are still alive and uninfected. The BSE scare was more of a BSE scandal. The mass sickness did not occur, but the mass slaughter of cattle was real, as was the impact upon the farming communities.

The BSE travesty was followed a year later by the scare that Sheep were now infected. They were not. This did not stop the senseless butchery of millions of Sheep. The result of this was the destruction of the meat industry in Britain, with the ridiculous situation of foreign livestock being imported into the country, causing great suffering to the animals, and great cost to the consumer. The end of British self sufficiency and the on going reliance upon imports is of course part of the Globalist agenda of interdependency on all commodities, including food.

In 2003 there was the Sars outbreak in Asia. Dr Patrick Nixon was rolled out to give scientific credence to the lunacy that the Sars outbreak would kill at least a quarter of the population of Great Britain. How many died, or even were infected? Zero, Nil, None, No one at all.

In 2006 we had the Bird Flu non-epidemic. The 1 in 4 Britons who were predicted to die, did not. The ‘first pandemic of the twentyfirst century’ was nothing of the sort. Millions of birds were slaughtered, but there were no human fatalities. The murder of the wildlife was sickening, and pointless.

Now we are told that Swine Flu will kill hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Already we are witnessing the mass slaughter of pigs and the destruction of the Pig Farming Industry in many countries. Swine Flu is another scare like Avian (Bird) Flu, Sars and BSE.

Why would the Government make such a ‘mistake’ as to spread fear and panic which will result in the further erosion of the national self-reliant farming community. ? Why? In order to tighten the Globalist noose and make any chance of national self determination and self sufficiency much more difficult.

The Government (as agents of the Globalist agenda) are not the only ones to benefit from the Swine Flu scandal. Pharmaceutical companies are set to make a fortune in selling un-needed and harmful drugs to the bewildered and terrified populations across the globe. They are manipulating a non event in order to make profit. This is economic and chemical terrorism.

The worst aspect of all this is that alongside the senseless slaughter of animals, the gullible and cowed masses who accept the vaccinations against this spectral pandemic will be unwittingly weakening their immune systems, so should real flu come, they will be less able to fight it.

Then, as a result of the mass vaccinations, many people will die. The Globalists and the Pharmaceutical Companies will have achieved their aims – power and profits – whilst ordinary people suffer, and animals are destroyed for no reason. This is the level of sickness and insanity which our rulers have reached.

Protect your families. Refuse the Vaccination. Protect the animals and the farming communities - expose this disgusting lie. There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Report a Terrorist -Open Letter to MI5

As a true englishman, it is my duty to uphold the values of my land. Therefore I feel I must comply with the request by the Government that I report terrorists wherever I find them.

I would like to report a certain Anthony Blair, formerly employed as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom plc (a subsidiary of the Rothschilds New Jerusalem Global consortium), and formerly resident at 11 Downing Street, London, current whereabouts unknown, presently employed as spokesman for the Zionist Cartel as crusader for war with Iran and related duties in the service of Greater Israel, with prospects for becoming Vozhd of the new Soviet Union in Strasburg/Bruxelles.

Mr Blair is a member of a terrorist gang who have organised and financed a series of terrorist attrocities, including the 11th September 2001 New York World Trade Centre bombing, and the subsequent bombings in London, Madrid, Bali amongst other targets. Perhaps the worst terrorist atrocities of this cartel have been the massacres in Jugoslavija, Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Panama, and many other nations. Hiding behind the front of NATO, the US-UK Coalition Forces, and the War on Terror, this coalition is responsible for the murder of in excess of 1 million Iraqi civilians through bombing and starvation warfare, and millions more globally through terrorist campaigns including pharmaceutical/biological warfare (AIDS, Ebola, Vaccinations) as well as military assaults and disruption of food supplies (Monsanto, IMF). The numbers already murdered run into many millions, with a further 7,000 million targeted as boasted in the Georgia Guidestones - effectively their war manifesto and Ten Satanic Commandments as listed below:

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

Mr Blair's Cartel colleagues include the Trilateral Commission, Round table Group, Bilderbergers, European Union Commission, Rockerfeller Institute, Rothschild family, and associated criminal gangs. These groups front for an organisation which goes by names such as the Illuminati, Zionist Lobby, International Banking Industry, Big Pharma... at the head of this terrorist group are figures such as the British Monarchy, the Israeli government and the Vatican II Group.

Before being elevated to the international wing of this infamous terrorist gang, Blair was a runner for the British branch, and responsible for the atrocities in Ireland committed under the name of IRA, UVF etc (as branches of Queen Elizabeth II's MI5).

I report Tony Blair and his terrorist collaborators, sure in the knowledge that British justice will prevail.

Your Gullible, brain-washed, TV-watching servant...

Third Position at Twenty

Third Positionism is twenty years old. The 10 points of Third Positionism which were formulated in 1989 have proven their worth. Not only do they remain as valid as they did in 1989, but they become more valid as each day passes.

It is true that the likes of Gri££in publicly espoused Third Positionism, then went on to advocate reactionary 'right-wing' politics. By accepting the left-right Masonic spectrum and seeking a place in it, these people have proven that they only paid lip service to the Spiritual Purpose encapsulated in the ideology they flirted with.

Those who now call themselves National Bolsheviks, National Anarchists, (Ziono-)Populists, Third Wayists etc have slipped into a materialist way of thinking - if they ever escaped it at all. This does not in any way dilute the importance of the Third Position.

Third Positionism is not merely an ideology, it is a way of life. All the movements which have been touched by this creed have benefited as a result. It is those which cling to materialist and establishment dogma (Monarchism, Zionism, Capitalism, Communism, Imperialism, Sectarianism, Addiction to Westminster &c)who have fallen into the traps set for them by the dogmas they adhere to.

As we race towards 2012 and the Global Superstate, Third Positionism is the only creed for those who refuse to sacrifice themselves and their families on the altar of International Materialism.

Let Gri££in and co accept the microchip and all that comes with it. Our concern is not with those who refuse to see the world for what it is; less so for those who purposely squeeze their eyes shut to block out the truth.

See the Ten Point Declaration of the Third Position HERE

First Black President just loves being a Slave to Jewry

The Globalists' Messiah and puppet President of the USA, Ehud Barak Obama, has once again shown how democratic the establishment of the USA is, and how much value can be placed in the words which spew forth from the mouths of politicians. Further emphasising his commitment to 'Change', Obama has taken the bold step of adjusting US policy as regards subservience to Israel through the fifth column of AIPAC. American policy used to be almost completely tailored to follow Israeli instruction. Now, Obama has 'Changed' this so that the tailoring need no longer be described as 'almost'.

As reported in the Israeli Ynet News, speaking at a pilgrimage to the Washington (DC) Wiesel Institute for fleecing the Goyim, devotee of Holocaustianity, Obama, in true sermonising manner stated:

"To this day, there are those who insist the Holocaust never happened, who perpetrate every form of intolerance. We have an opportunity as well as an obligation to confront these scourges… That is my commitment as president. How do we ensure that 'never again' [Never again? The Holyhoax Never happened once, how can a non-event happen Again?] isn't an empty slogan or merely an aspiration, but also a call to action? I believe we start by doing what we are doing today – by bearing witness, by fighting the silence that is evil's greatest co-conspirator." - Or to translate the Newspeak, by upping the lying propaganda and further persecuting those who dare to stand up for truth.

Obama prostrated himself before his self-chosen masters, in a manner which would make any African-American with hang-ups about Slavery, physically sick, bragging about his visit to the Zionist Satanic Synagogue, Yad Vashem, stating that the bandit state Israel had risen "from the destruction of the Holocaust." This of course is true - Israel has been built on the holocaust of Palestine. Without the ritual slaughter of the Semitic people of Palestine, the Ashkenazi butchers would not be in possesion of the stolen land of Palestine.

High Priest of Holocaustianity, Elie Wiesel, asked the hand-wringing question "Will the world ever learn?" and in true democratic fashion lamented the attendance of Iranian President Ahmadinejad at a UN forum to discuss racism, asking "Why was he invited...if Auschwitz could not cure the world of anti-Semitism, what will?" - Perhaps not supporting the anti-Semitic, murdering, criminal state of Israel eh Mr Obama?

Au Weh indeed!

See the blog below for comments which sum up the puppet Obama and his inhuman masters...

http://obamboozled.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-vows-to-battle-holocaust-denial.html

The European open internet is under imminent threat

Source: http://blackouteurope.eu/

URGENT - VOTING IN EU PARLIAMENT 5th of MAY 2009
Don't let the EU parliament lock up the Internet! There will be no way back!

Act now!
Internet access is not conditional


Everyone who owns a website has an interest in defending the free use of Internet... so has everyone who uses Google or Skype... everyone who expresses their opinions freely, does research of any kind, whether for personal health problems or academic study ... everyone who shops online...who dates online...socialises online... listens to music...watches video...

Millions of Europeans now depend on the Internet, directly or indirectly, for their livelihood. Taking it away, chopping it up, ‘restricting it', ‘limiting it' and placing conditions on our use of it, will have a direct impact on people's earnings. And in the current financial climate, that can't be good.

The internet as we know it is at risk because of proposed new EU rules going through end of April. Under the proposed new rules, broadband providers will be legally able to limit the number of websites you can look at, and to tell you whether or not you are allowed to use particular services. It will be dressed up as ‘new consumer options' which people can choose from. People will be offered TV-like packages - with a limited number of options for you to access.

It means that the Internet will be packaged up and your ability to access and to put up content could be severely restricted. It will create boxes of Internet accessibility, which don't fit with the way we use it today. This is because internet is now permitting exchanges between persons which cannot be controlled or "facilitated" by any middlemen (the state or a corporation) and this possibility improves the citizen's life but force the industry to lose power and control. that's why they are pushing governments to act those changes.

The excuse is to control the flow of music, films and entertainment content against the alleged piracy by downloading for free, using P2P file-sharing. However, the real victims of this plan will be all Internet users and the democratic and independent access to information, culture goods.

Think about how you use the Internet! What would it mean to you if free access to the Internet was taken away?

These days, the Internet is about life and freedom. It's about shopping, booking theatre tickets ... holidays, learning, job-seeking, banking, and trade. It's also about the fun things - dating, chatting, invitations, music, entertainment, joking and even a Second Life. It is a tool to express ourselves, to collaborate, innovate, share, stimulate new business ideas, reach new markets - thrive without middlemen..

Just think - what's your web address? Unless people have that address in their "package" of regular websites - they won't be able to find you. That means they can't buy, or book, or register, or even view you online. Your business won't be able to find niche suppliers of goods - and compare prices. If you get any money at all from advertising on your site, it will diminish. Yes, Amazon and a select few will be OK, they will be the included in the package. But your advertising on Google or any other website, will be increasingly worthless. Skype could be blocked. (As it is in Germany in the use from iPhone, already). Small businesses could literally disappear, especially specialist, niche or artisan businesses.

If we don't do something now - we could lose free and open use of the internet. Our freedom (of choice in information, market, culture, pleasure) will be curtailed. The EU proposals hold an enormous risk for our future. They are about to become Law - and will be virtually impossible to reverse. People (even the members of the European Parliament who are voting on it) don't really seem to understand the full implications and the legal changes are wrapped up in something called "Telecoms Package" which lulls people into thinking it is just about industry.

However, in reality, hiding from public view, the amendments are about the way the Internet will operate in future! Text that expresses your rights to access and distribute content, services and applications, is being crossed out. And the text that is being brought in, says that broadband providers must inform you of any limitations, or restrictions to your broadband service. Alternative versions use the word ‘conditions' - and it is seriously being proposed that you will be told the conditions of use of Internet services. This is made to sound good - it is dressed up as ‘transparency' - except that of course it means that the broadband provider will have the legal right restrict your access or impose conditions,otherwise why would they need tell you? If the Telecoms Package amendmentsare voted in, the changes will not be reversible.

We all have a stake in the Internet! You need to act now to save it!
What can you do about it?

Tell the European Parliament to vote against conditional access to the Internet! Remind them that they need your vote in June and that internet still give us the tools to be watching and judging what they are doing! (link a la quadrature du net) You must know you are not alone: hundreds of organisations are working on that and thousands of people have already contact their parliamentarians about this issue.

So, act now:
1 - Email, write to or phone your MEP - follow this link to get theirdetails - a suggested template letter is attached. You can also use the following software that send the letter directly to all the parliamentarians. Believe, they will really receive it and they will really feel the pressure. You are welcome to personalize the letter and include information that will make MEPs wake up, take note and take appropriate action.

2 - Forward this email to everyone you know so that they can take action.

3 - Syndicate this page so that you keep been informed: disinformation is what they count on, we must be aware. Text for people to cut and paste to MEP: The coalition version needs to have instructions for people from each country. coalition members need to get a translated version online in their own languages and link to the LQ site for their own MEPs.

Suggest you indicate:


Here are the MEPs who are important in the process.
Here are the MEPs from [your country] [or list each country of the coalition] .

This is suggested letter / email to send to your MEP. Personalise this email to include your own Internet use in your personal and business life. Change the sentence in red to personalise the email and tell the MEP how you individually use the Internet or just take it off.

Tony B.Liar, Son of Jerusalem

Former Prime Minister of the UK, Tony Blair, when in the British Embassy in Washington, USA, just before Easter wrote in the Vilest Inbred Parasites (VIP) book, that his home is Jerusalem. Tony Blair is currently prostituting himself before his Globalist bosses as Middle East Peace Envoy. So does this mean he identifies with Jerusalem because he instinctively abhors the occupation of Palestine and the persecution of the Palestinians in their own capital? Or does it mean he identifies himself with the brutal criminals who illegally occupy the land of Palestine using the farcical, historically incorrect, Israel?

Why is Tony Blair doing the rounds as a Middle East Envoy? What is his interest in Ersatz, sorry Eretz Y'Israel?

Well, perhaps we can find clues in his address to the Labour Party Conference on the 2nd October 2001, just weeks after the 11th September MOSSAD/CIA/MI5 atrocities in New York. He stated:

"In retrospect, the Millennium marked only a moment in time. It was the events of September 11 that marked a turning point in history,...What happened on 11 September was without parallel in the bloody history of terrorism....We know those responsible...Whatever the dangers of the action we take, the dangers of inaction are far, far greater...The action we take will be proportionate; targeted; we will do all we humanly can to avoid civilian casualties...

"Round the world, 11 September is bringing Governments and people to reflect, consider and change. And in this process, amidst all the talk of war and action, there is another dimension appearing. There is a coming together. The power of community is asserting itself. We are realising how fragile are our frontiers in the face of the world's new challenges...I have long believed this interdependence defines the new world we live in...To the Afghan people we make this commitment. The conflict will not be the end. We will not walk away, as the outside world has done so many times before...

"..our self-interest and our mutual interests are today inextricably woven together. This is the politics of globalisation...We watch aspects of it with trepidation. We feel powerless, as if we were now pushed to and fro by forces far beyond our control...globalisation is a fact and, by and large, it is driven by people. Not just in finance, but in communication, in technology, increasingly in culture, in recreation. In the world of the internet, information technology and TV, there will be globalisation. And in trade, the problem is not there's too much of it; on the contrary there's too little of it...

"..round the world, nations are instinctively drawing together. In Quebec, all the countries of North and South America deciding to make one huge free trade area, rivalling Europe...In Europe, the most integrated grouping of all, we are now 15 nations. Another 12 countries negotiating to join, and more beyond that.

"A new relationship between Russia and Europe is beginning. And will not India and China, each with three times as many citizens as the whole of the EU put together, once their economies have developed sufficiently as they will do, not reconfigure entirely the geopolitics of the world and in our lifetime? That is why, with 60 per cent of our trade dependent on Europe, three million jobs tied up with Europe, much of our political weight engaged in Europe, it would be a fundamental denial of our true national interest to turn our backs on Europe. We will never let that happen...

"This is a moment to seize. The Kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us re-order this world around us."

(Full text: part one; part two)

This speech was B.Liar at his Globalist worst. His speech contained nothing about serving Great Britain - the nation of which he was Prime Minister - but instead prattled on about the need for Global Integration. Perhaps this explains why he feels more at home in the occupied capital of Palestine, Jerusalem, which is the proposed Global Capital for the 'New World Order' as laid out in the blueprints of the Protocols of Zion.

Were Tony Blair just another former Prime Minister doing the international junket, then his professed allegiance to Israel would be inconsequential. However, Blair is on the campaign trail to become the first President of the EU. This makes his public statement of subservience to the Zionist State very disturbing indeed. People with little understanding of the significance of his public expressions of fidelity will argue that he made a mistake. This is nonsense. His writing that his home is Jerusalem, when signing the VIP book, was a deliberate act of openly devoting himself to his masters.

Should the Lisbon Treaty be ratified, whether Blair becomes President or not, we can be sure that the judaisation of the EU into the Jeuropean Soviet Union will be accelerated. With the accession of the Zionist State of Turkey, the death of Europe will be virtually guaranteed. Now is the time to stop this monster.

MIRA5 and the Lisbon Treaty

Recently in the United Kingdom, the spectre of Irish terrorism reared its head again. The spiral of violence which had been a feature of life in the British Isles since the 1960s had stopped altogether, with terrorists from the Green and Orange factions declaring ceasefires. Why then has the violence restarted?

The reason the IRA has been reactivated is to scare the people of Ireland into accepting the Lisbon Treaty, which will be the basis for the Constitution of the European Union.

The IRA (Irish Republican Army) grew from the IRB (Irish Republican Brotherhood). In the pantomime of British politics, the IRA were given the role of being opponents of the UVF (Ulster Volunteer Force), which was an outgrowth of the Orange Order.

In official political history, the IRA are portrayed as fighters defending the 6 Counties in the North of Ireland from the British occupiers. The UVF are portrayed as fighters defending the British people of Ulster against the aggression of Irish invaders. In truth, the province of Ulster is at once British AND Irish. The entire conflict is a farce, with Celt fighting Celt for no valid reason. The people of Ulster are Scots-Irish on both sides of the divide. They are kinsmen who have been manipulated into identifying themselves with contrived sectarian issues. The entire Protestant vs Catholic, Green vs Orange division would be the stuff of comedy, were it not for the lives of real people which had been snuffed out or ruined.

Putting the official history of the Ulster conflict in the box of lies where it belongs, the truth is somewhat different to what the establishment would have us believe. The Irish Tricolour clearly shows the reality of who is behind the bloodshed in Ireland. The flag contains the colours Green, White and Orange. The Nationalist faction (IRA) in the conflict use the colour Green, whites the Loyalist faction (UVF) use the Colour Orange. The significance of this is that the IRB and Orange Order are both Masonic Lodges, and Freemasons chose the colours of the flag. The IRB and Orange Lodge are made up of brother Masons, who use the IRA and UVF to terrify the ordinary populations into submitting to their agenda.

Violence has been used in the British Isles by the Masonic Brethren to justify the transformation of the nations into Police States. Now, with the possibility of the Lisbon treaty being defeated by the freedom-loving Irish, the IRA has been wheeled out to terrorise the people into accepting a single European Superstate as the alternative to a divided Ireland with civil war on the streets. Who are the Real IRA? They are operatives of the British Government and its puppets in the Irish Republic. The same is true of the UVF.

It is not the Irish or the British who are to blame for the bloodshed in the Isles, but the establishment, and ultimately the Monarchy who control them.

Say No to the Lisbon Treaty, and No to the Monarchy. A free Europe of many nations is the solution to the threat of terrorism. A Europe where all Monarchies are memories and where the corpses of the British Royal family are on display to dissuade any would-be traitors form ever again murdering and raping our people to satisfy their depravity and bloodlust, and to increase their power and wealth.

From Galway to the Urals. Long Live Europa!

One of the great ironies of the move towards a New World Order is that in the process of building Super States such as the European Union, the controlled media are being used to whip up hatred amongst the indigenous peoples, whilst pushing the melting pot propaganda.

In Great Britain, the tabloids (which laughingly masquerade as ‘news’ papers), daily push propaganda attacking the new arrivals from Eastern Europe. To read the stories in such rags as the ‘Sun’ and ‘Mirror’, one could be forgiven for believing that every crime in the country was committed by people from Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic etc.

This hysteria has even found expression amongst members of the Nationalist community. It saddens me to say that I have heard otherwise sensible people speaking of the need to deport all the Poles as they are threatening the character of Britain!

In truth, with the exception of certain groups of European passport holders, typically from Romania, the vast majority of the people from the East of Europe have caused no problems in Britain, and have in fact had a positive impact upon the communities in which they have become resident. Those who have acted as criminals acted as scum in the lands in which they lived before coming to our shores, and were it not for the plague of political correctness, would certainly never have been granted citizenship in the lands they have infested. True to the false reporting of the British press, these parasites have been labelled as Romanians, Hungarians, Bulgarians etc, rather than having their real identities revealed.

In contrast to the scapegoating of our European Brothers and sisters, the controlled press have been silent in exposing the mafia who control the people-trafficking, prostitution, heroin-dealing, and serious organised crime. These people tend to have European passports, and generally British ones at that. However, the media remain silent. I would comment as to why this is, but doing so would contravene legislation which is in place to aid the bedding down of the those who are ancestors would never have allowed to remain on our shores. Such is our faux democracy.

I appeal to all who have the sense to see through the lies of the media, to see our brethren from the East for what they are – our kinfolk. In areas where Britons have been unable to go for decades, the newcomers have made inroads for all of us.

We need to get away from seeing Nationality as being based on bits of paper. This is pure judicial nonsense. We need to start seeing the importance of kinship above all else.

You can guarantee that the media will welcome the accession of Turkey to the EU, even though the Zionist nation is not in any way European, but is, as it always has been, a mortal enemy of all things European.

The time has come to take a stand. From Galway to the Urals, long live the real Europe. The land of the Celts, Germans, Norse, Dinarics and Slavs!

оклик Россия оклик европа

Hitler at 120. Europe's or Israel's best?

Today, the 20th April 2009, marks the 120th anniversary of the birth of Adolf Hitler, leader of the NSDAP. To National Socialists this is a day of celebration. To others the day comes with other feelings.

There are those who proclaim Hitler to be the Devil himself - to have been the man who ordered the destruction of European Jewry, and planned to take over the world. This accusation must be dismissed as the ripple throughout history of crude propaganda by the establishments of the nations militarily organised against the Third Reich. The professed goal of the NSDAP was Lebensraum for the German |people, not global conquest. Likewise, the alleged holocaust is a lie of the biggest magnitude, and when looked at objectively, an insult to all the peoples of Europe who have ever since been attacked using this falsehood.

So, what then should we make of Adolf Hitler and his contributi0on to World History?

Adolf Hitler was a man who presented himself as the saviour of Germany. However, in 1945, Germany was in ruins, with millions of Germans dead, wounded, raped, destitute, and vilified throughout the world. The proudest of all the nations of Europe was subjected to the basest humiliation with the sickest crimes committed by the victor against its people. Surely we cannot blame Hitler for that, can we? Wasn’t Hitler fighting a life and death struggle to save Germany from the amassed forces of bolshevism and plutocracy? How can those of us who weren’t even born at the time of the Second World War judge the man who fought to save his nation from the Satanic forces which conquered Europe?

I would say that because we find ourselves living in a European super-state controlled by what can only be called dæmonic forces, we must examine how this came to pass, and what was Hitler’s rôle in destroying the old Europe to pave the way for the new anti-Europe in which we live.

There is great controversy over Hitler’s political and ethnic background. It has been claimed that he was an illegitimate member of the Rothschild dynasty. For those who appreciate the importance of bloodlines in the unfolding of history, this is no small matter. Ironically it is professed National Socialists, often the most vehemently anti-Judaic, who refuse to discuss this issue. If Hitler was related by blood to the most prominent of the Zionist families, then this is no insignificant detail – it is in fact a very important detail, which demands attention.

Another question that must be addressed is Hitler’s war strategy. Having defeated France in 1940, Hitler could have finished the War on the Western Front by capturing the British Expeditionary Force. The result would have been to put Britain in a position where her establishment would have been forced to negotiate a peace in order to ensure the safe return of her fighting men. Did Hitler take the golden opportunity presented by the stranding of the BEF in Belgium and France, as a means to end the war with the Germanic-Celtic nation of Great Britain? No. He allowed the BEF to retreat to the British mainland, even going so far as ordering his generals not to attempt to prevent the rescue of the stranded British Servicemen. Hitler often spoke of the necessity of grabbing hold of whatever the ‘Goddess of Fortune’ proffered, lest the opportunity never be repeated. The BEF incident showed a refusal to take advantage of the situation, and forced a multi-front war on Germany and his allies. Can this be put down to a mere misjudgement of the British establishment? Or was it a calculated tactic to ensure Total War and the destruction of Germany?

Following the debacle on the Western Front, Hitler launched Unternehmen Barbarossa against the Soviet Union. The Armies of the Third Reich achieved unimaginable victories and looked set to smash the USSR. Again, Hitler’s orders are bizarre. The European people who had suffered under the non-European, non-Christian, Soviet Kommisariat, greeted the armies led by Germany as liberators. They had suffered under the heel of Talmudic Bolshevism, and rushed to greet their European brothers from the West. Hitler ordered the German military to treat the people of Eastern Europe as sub-humans. Rather than enlisting the populations of the liberated nations to the side of Free Europe, the civilians were treated as cattle, in much the same ,manner as they had been under the Soviets. These legions of potential allies were forced into the arms of the Soviets to fight in what Stalin termed the ‘Great Patriotic War’. Again, defeat was clasped form the jaws of victory.

In 1941, the Geramn Army had reached Volgograd. General Paulus of the Sixth Army advised Hitler that supply lines were over stretched. Incredibly, rather than encircling the city (renamed Stalingrad), and driving forward to the oil-rich lands beyond, Hitler ordered that Volgograd-Stalingrad be captured at any costs. Paulus was over-ruled and the infamous Battle of Stalingrad proceeded. The Goddess of Fortune had offered the Axis armies the oil foields of the Caucasus and almost certain vicory over the Soviets. This would have completed the war on the Eastern Front. Hitler instead chose to force his soldiers into the charnel house of Stalingrad, which led to the deaths through combat, starvation, frost, and execution, of some of Europe’s finest men. This defeat was in truth the death blow for Europe, from which our continent has never recovered.

The Blitzkrieg air raids over Great Britain were a well conceived strategy to break the military capabilities of Britain. Taken alongside the highly successful U-boat blockades, it was only a matter of time before Great Britain would have been unable to feed herself or continue the war effort. Hitler ordered the air-raids to shift away from attacking military and industrial tragets, and to focus upon civilians, in terror raids like those being inflicted upon German civilians. The result of this was to galvanise British support for the War, and to allow for increased military efficiency. Was this mere misjudgement on behalf of Hitler, or was it intentional and designed to lenghten the war and further wreck all Europena natins involved?

Hitler’s treatment of the Jews is another point which has to be examined without the blinkers of ideology. The lie of the Holocaust is a huge smokecreen. Hitler’s regime had many Jews in prominent positions, and the policy regarding Organised Jewry cannot really be described as anything less than Zionist. The film ‘Schindler’s List’ portrays Herr Schindler as an exceptional nan who smuggled Jews into Palestine. He was not exceptional in any way. Jews were routinely removed from Europe to Palestine as a matter of German policy. The real result of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies was to put a stop to the process of assimilation which had been threatening the very existence of a separate Jewish people in Europe. By detaining ordinary Jews, the Hitler regime actually aided the Zionist agenda of creating a Jewish persecution complex in order to ensure the survival of the Jews as an ethnic group. When one considers that ethnically, apart from the Sephardim (who are persecuted by the dominant Ashkenazi false Jews), there really is no such thing as a Jewish Race, Hitler’s policy cannoyt be seen as anything but disasterous for all nations of the World. Without the anti-Jewish hysteria, there would have been no justification for the establishment of Eretz Yisrael. The anti-Jewish policy of the Nazi regime was 100% Ashke-Nazi.

Today marks 120 years since the birth of Adolf Hitler. His National Socialist Movement presented the world with policies to overthrow the Freemasonic network, to defeat Globalism and ensure National Freedom and Social Justice for all. With the advent of the War, the ideology of National Socialism has been so tarred by the propaganda of the victors and the self-destructive actions ordered by Hitler, that any oppostion to the Globalist agenda which attempts to utilise realistic and effective means to oppose the New World Order, is reacted to in a Pavlovian manner as being ‘evil’.

The only solution to Globalism is Nationalism. The only solution to the concentration of power and property (whether Capitalist or Communist) is the widest practicable Distribution. On Hitler’s 120th birthday, we need to face the reality that National Distributism, as a core tenet of National Socialism, is the solution to the Satanic-Imperialist-Masonic-Zionist New World Order. And we need to face up to the fact that we will forever be linked to Hitler for this.

We need to ask ourselves how we are to deal with the Hitler issue. It matters whether Hitler was manipulated into destroying Europe and building Israel; whether his mistakes were genuine and without hindsight may have been unavoidable; whether his involvement was more sinister and guided by the Rothschilds to whom he may have been related.

I know this artcle will offend Hitlerian National Socialists. It is not my intention to please anyone, rather to find real ways to halt and to unravel the fast solidifying Global Super-state. Hitlerite, Strasserite, Nazi, Anti-Nazi? What difference will it make when the One World Government is completed and all freedoms abolished? All comments are welcome. So fans of Hitler and opponents alike, what do you think?

Open Letter from 2008, comments from now

I originally wrote the following article on the 11th July 2008 for inclusion in the BPP magazine, 'Vanguard'. The article was not published at the time, and to my understanding had been discarded. However, over the weekend I was informed that the article is now in circulation - published in order to cause mischief, and published against my wishes. I am reproducing the article in order to answer questions which have been posted in various fora. I have written my comments in bold after each section

Open letter to the National Front (11.7.8)

I write this with a degree of sadness. I strongly believe in Nationalist Unity and have up to this point refrained from commenting adversely on any organisation that belongs to the Nationalist family. However, I feel that I can no longer remain silent with regards to the National Front. I have remained silent in spite of the National Front proscribing the British People’s Party. This proscription was an act of spite, coming from the jealousy of the National Front for the British People’s Party being stronger numerically and ideologically. This pettiness is indicative of a profound malaise at the heart of the National Front.

....I do not believe in the proscribing of any legal organisation. Certainly, taking steps to ensure that members do not fraternise with terrorists (IRA, UVF) and Police honey traps (C18), is vital. No serious organisation can tolerate those who advocate violence. The BPP wholeheartedly opposed terrorism. If it had been any other away, I would not have given the BPP my support.

The National Front is an organisation with an impressive history. In the 1970s it was a serious force in British politics. Had the Conservative Party not cynically stolen the NF’s policies, life in this country may well have been much better than it is today. The developments in the 1980s that led to Third Positionism becoming an important aspect of Nationalist thought also deserve much praise. Unfortunately these advances tend to be forgotten due to the personality clashes and schisms that resulted. They remain praiseworthy nonetheless.

The National Front of today is not even a shadow of its former self. It has neither the physical impact of the original Front nor the spiritual and moral ideological presence of the Political Soldier stage of the NF. Both stages of the NF were impressive, the latter even more so than the former for the continuing influence of the radical ideas the NF infused into the greater Nationalist movement.

Such have been the splits and regroupings that aside from the name, the current NF has virtually nothing in common with the great party whose name the modern pretenders have usurped. It is a shame that the name ‘National Front’ has not been given a decent burial so it may be remembered with respect as the inspiration to generations of Nationalists. By continuing to use the NF name, the current grouping is tarring that memory. The Beatles are remembered as a band which had a significant impact on popular culture (for good or ill is a matter of debate!) Their strength is in part due to knowing when to quit on a high, the Rolling Stones lamentably stumbled on and lost their way. Such is the situation with the NF today.

....Whilst I still stand by my point that the NF name should have been dropped in order to preserve it as an inspiration, we find ourselves in a situation where nostalgia is a luxury we cannot afford. The NF continues, and it offers an organisational platform for driving the opposition to Globalism which is destroying every nation of the world. We need organised groups to fight the New World Order. The NF is one such group. We could get involved in romantic reminiscing for the movement that was, but it would do none of us any good. The group exists, and as such provides a vehicle for exposing the despotism of Westminster and Bruxelles. History is important, but the present is where we must fight if we are to have any chance of securing a viable future for our people.

On Thursday, 10th July, the group that calls itself the National Front stood in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. They never stood a chance in this Conservative stronghold. The result they achieved is an embarrassment. The National Front came 4th, behind the Conservatives who won with 71.6% of the vote (17,113 votes), the Greens (7.4%, 1,758 votes) and the English Democrats (7.2%, 1,174 votes).

The National Front achieved a pathetic 2.3% of the vote – a mere 544 votes, losing their deposit. They only managed to get 23 more votes than Gemma Garrett (Miss Great Britain Party). The fact that the English Democrats trounced the NF shows just how out of touch with the electorate these pseudo-political dinosaurs are. If the NF had not stood, the English Democrats would have come in second and denied the internationalist Greens second place. The NF standing was a disaster all round.

It is a shame that Tess Culnane allowed herself to be involved in this farce. Tess is a lady for whom there is great esteem in the nationalist community. She did not need to stand in the election to prove her worth and decency – she has already done that.

....Not long after the ill-conceived election campaign, Tess Culnane left the NF due to the refusal of the old leadership to face up to the realities of political life in the Police State which is twentyfirst century Britain. It is to the shame of the immovable dinosaurs who misled the NF into the July 2008 election, that they treated Tess in such a deplorable manner. The rank and file, and Tess Culnane, are to be applauded for the effort they put into the campaign. However, the leadership should not have been so short sighted as to have pushed this petty political ploy.

The tactic of standing against David Davis in order to gain publicity was pure publicity seeking opportunism. It was wholly unprincipled. The National Front had no chance of even saving their deposit in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. By standing they sent out a message that they oppose an honourable politician (now how often does one of those appear?) in his campaign to stop the Government grabbing the obscenely draconian power to hold suspects for 42 days without charge.

The Stalinist policy of the Brown regime is a threat to everyone - Do the National Front believe they are immune to this evil? History shows that Nationalists will suffer as much as, if not more than everyone else. David Davis stood for the sole purpose of raising awareness of the dictatorial nature of the government’s policy of detaining anyone they wish to, without trial and without reason, for 42 hours.

Tess Culnane stated that she wished to broaden the debate to cover the reasons for the current terrorist attacks, covering issues such as immigration and the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Occupied Palestine etc. These are important factors, which need addressing. However, the Haltemprice and Howden by-election was not an appropriate arena for this. The 42-hour detention issue is so important that no distraction should be indulged in. Tess is a lady with convictions. Sadly the National Front leadership have taken advantage of Tess. They have proven themselves to be inappropriately opportunistic. Our complaint is not against Tess or the decent hardworking members of the National Front (and other individuals) who campaigned for her, far from it, these people acted honourably. Our objection is with the leadership of the National Front who chose to indulge in petty politics to the detriment of us all.

....I absolutely 100% stand by this statement. Fighting an unwinnable election at great expense, against a candidate who was at least discussing the tyranny of the State (albeit as a lackey of the same establishment he feigned to oppose), was in my opinion a huge error in judgement.

The NF is run by amateurs who seem incapable of formulating a coherent political strategy. The lack of direction has been apparent for some time, but this year this has palpably worsened. We have witnessed marches of around twenty people, which have served only to show the weakness of the Front and have been easy target for the opposition. We have seen failure to expel a member for proven pædophilia. We have seen tolerance of members who espouse terrorism. We have seen participation in an election that has sent out a message of support for the Brown regime and resulted in the vote received being an embarrassment. This is not all - I could go on.

....Again, I stand resolutely behind this statement. Marches of tiny bands of activists only serve to display weakness. Failing to expel pædophile scum Martyn Gilleard was an affront to decency. For this, the leadership of the time should hang their heads in shame. Ordinary members are not to blame for this lack of action by the higher echelons. It is to be hoped that the shame brought on the party will be remembered should the old leadership call on the support of the rank and file who they dishonoured with this failure to uphold the good name of the party.

This letter is an appeal to the ordinary members of the National Front who do not indulge in fantasies of armed struggle – to the vast majority. Anyone who lives under the illusion that terrorism can achieve anything other than to give the State an excuse to take away even more of our freedoms is not welcome in our ranks. This is an appeal to the decent Nationalists in the National Front, including those in the leadership who can see beyond the idea of being a big fish in a tiny murky puddle, to see that the time has come to accept that the National Front has had its day. The time has come to consign the National Front to history, to remember it with fondness and to move on.

....As I’ve written above, we are now in such a dire situation, with the imminent imposition of the European Constitution through the bogus Lisbon Treaty, that we have to fight with very legal weapon at our disposal. It matters not one jot if the NF name is dropped, and in the time lost, the slim chance of defeating the completion of the Soviet European Union, is lost. If we do not stop the shift from the current EU to the Fabian wet dream of the Communitarian Superstate, then all hope is lost. It is as simple as that.

The National Front is a Royalist Party. The Monarchy of this country is directly responsible for the unprecedented betrayal of the indigenous population and associated kinfolk. Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. This blasphemy comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. This tyrant is the man who planted the Protestant Scots in Ulster. These Scots became the Loyalists who the NF supports in the ongoing sectarian warfare. We do not support the IRA – we do not support anyone who encourages intra-ethnic warfare, however we do appreciate that the Loyalists are the descendants of people who were not originally native to Ulster. This ethnic difference, with its most noticeable expression in terms of religious variation does not merit conflict – from either faction. Both Orange and Green Nationalists need to see the bigger picture. The outcome of sectarian warfare is the ultimate demise of all, to the benefit of people who have no kinship whatsoever with the folk of the British Isles.

The internationalist agenda of the burgeoning New World Order has been pushed relentlessly by the British Monarchy. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Boer families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth. The wholesale slaughter of civilians continued with the destruction of Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen rewarded Rudi Giuliani for his part in the murderous attacks on the New York World Trade Centre. The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda which the Royals not only support, but revel in. The NF supports these imperialist criminals. The BPP feel that there is no justification for the British people giving their loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of the nation they purport to serve.

....Again, I stand by this statement. The Monarchy are the smiling face of our financial, social and cultural enemy. The NF must drop all support for these monsters. I hope that by working with the NF, I can expose the Royal Family for the murderers, rapists, and all round Satanic usurious vermin that they are. This may offend some people, but those who tug their forelocks and sing ‘God Save the Queen’ need to be woken up to see the reality that those they misguidedly genuflect to, are the vilest, sickest family on the planet.

All decent members of the NF, from top to bottom, who genuinely believe in putting the interests of our Nation and People before all other matters, are welcome to come to the BPP. Ours is a movement of principles.

Our movement does not indulge in petty politics but sees the bigger picture. We will not contest elections as a reaction to the political wind. We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share!

....I would question the principles of the BPP and the commitment to not indulge in petty politics: What else would one call mischievously publishing an article I wrote 9 months ago? Perhaps where I wrote ‘We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share’, I should have written ‘I’ in place of ‘We’.

We will not put our people in danger by going on marches in inadequate numbers. We do not say that we will never have marches – we may, when our numbers are sufficient to send out a message that we are strong. That time will come.

....This commitment was abandoned when the BPP held a demo against racist rap music. Whilst I applaud the initiative, the fact is that BPP personnel were put at risk. On a positive note, the hypocrisy of AFA/ACF & ANaL/SWP was exposed, with their much-vaunted anti-racism shown to be a complete sham.

We will never tolerate pædophiles in our ranks. Our movement is a family in which comradeship matters. We have a support network unrivalled in the broader Nationalist movement.

We fight for all our people, not just for a particular religious faction. We reject the sectarianism of the National Front. It is ludicrous for people of European stock to be killing one another over matters such as whether divorce is or isn’t allowed, whilst all the time we are losing our territory to outsiders. This if even less tolerable when one considers that the sectarian factions (Sinn Fein, Orange Order etc) embrace the very multiculturalism that is destroying our lands.

....The anti-Sectarian stance of the BPP has been eroded since this article was written, with badges being sold in support of Loyalist paramilitaries. I personally oppose all terrorists operating in or from the North of Ireland. They are all, trained, funded and often staffed by British Military Intelligence (MI5). Doubtless there will be some members of the NF who support these agents of British tyranny, and they will need to be educated to awareness of how they are being hoodwinked into supporting their enemies, else kicked out for the agents provocateur and idiots they must otherwise be. However, in the light of BPP leaders selling terrorist fund-raising material, this naïvety pales into near insignificance.

The NF is imperialist, sectarian, royalist and rooted in the dark history of a past we need to overcome. People who support this agenda have no part in the Nationalist movement. The NF has no part in the Nationalist movement.

....So long as the NF aids in the fight against the Global prison, then it is a useful part of the struggle. Its Imperialist, Royalist, Sectarian past is a major problem, which must be dealt with. Right now, however, it is urgent that all opponents of the New World Order march against this peril. I would go so far as to say that we should be encouraging the rank and file of groups such as UKIP and the BNP in fighting the EU totalitarian superstate.

The time has come to join a movement rooted in the present, which looks to the future. The past is gone forever – remember it but don’t try to recreate it. Join the movement, which can and will, make a real difference!

....If I was writing this article now, I would say that the time has come to get involved with any and all movements which oppose the rapid move to a Global Superstate. It is certainly not the time for poaching members to boost membership lists. Parties must now be seen as regiments in the battle against the common enemy, and not as part of the Westminster circus. To that end, we must be steering each and every organisation we can in this battle for national and cultural life and death. If you think that winning seats in Parliament will make any difference, then you may as well join one of the Parties who are already in Parliament and feed from the rotting carcass of your nation, alongside the willing servants of the establishment.

Environmentalism as Religion

Environmentalism is an emotive issue - and naturally so. We all have to live on this planet and it is important that we take care of it. We need to protect the animals and vegetation. Also we must be more careful in ensuring we do not turn the planet into a giant rubbish heap. To that end, being environmentally conscientious is a good and laudable thing.

However, the 'Environmentalism' being preached by the likes of Al Gore, is not about caring for the planet. Sustainability is a propaganda technique to brainwash us into falling for the lie of man-made climate change. The climate is changing - it always has done so, regardless of human activity. What is the cause then? In a nutshell, the temperature of the Earth is regulated by the Sun. Increased Solar activity results in increased Earth temperature. For that matter, the other planets are influenced in the same manner. Mars, Uranus, Saturn and the rest are also experiencing 'Global Warming', but I don't think we can blame 4 by 4 drivers for that!

Why then the constant propaganda saying that ordinary people are killing the planet? Why the silencing of Science which exposes the Man-made Global Warming fraud? Why? To justify a Global tax, administered by a Global Government, enforced by a Global Police and Army. What better way to ensure compliance with the new Global Superstate than to create a new Religion for the masses to blindly follow?

Religion has long been a means of manipulating the people into serving their rulers. Fear of the big daddy in the sky watching everyone and damning all transgressors (of Priestly/State laws) to eternal suffering amid fire and brimstone, no longer works. Fear of unprovable environmental destruction is the new bogeyman to beat the masses into obedience. It is the new 'Faith' for the New World Order.

..Thanks to 'la bella senorina' for questioning this new dogma, and being a heretic swimming against the sea of political correctness - you know who you are!

G-20: The aftermath.

Yesterday saw the G-20 Circus arrive in London. The Summit was really just a pantomime event; with real policy having been settled well in advance. The ludicrous official story the media would have us believe, is that elected officials from the G-20 nations met to thrash out economic policy to deal with the global economic crisis, and reached a consensus all could agree on in just a single day. There were no clashes with regards to differences in National interests and no quibbling over monetary input. That really is an insult to our intelligence.

Personality Trivia

The media focussed on how every woman in Great Britain wants to look like the US President’s wife, Michelle Obama. I haven’t met anyone who was asked, or knows anyone who was asked, what they think of Obama’s dress sense! Frankly, with the ever-spiralling cost of living, no one cares. But according to the media, the entire nation is obsessed with this non-issue.

What other vital information did the British media impart to the people? Well, we were told that Jamie Oliver catered from the Vile Irrelevant Parasites (VIPs), that Michelle Obama (the media’s darling) hugged the Queen and that US President Obama prostrated himself before the Queen in a manner which all thinking Americans would find horrific, and all thinking Britons would find embarrassing (servile arse-licking impresses no one in Britain).

Here are just two of Obama’s nauseating grovelling statements:

“I think in the imagination of people throughout America, I think what the Queen stands for and her decency and her civility, what she represents, that's very important… There’s one last thing that I should mention that I love about Great Britain, and that is the Queen.”

The Queen stands for all that is wrong with Britain. To taody to this monster is absolutety disgraceful – and this from the President of a nation which fought for independence from the tyrannical Monarchy, is just unbelievable.

With all the attention focussed by the media on the new Washington DC puppet, one would be forgiven for thinking Obama was the ruler of Great Britain rather than a foreign Head of State. The way the Westminster regime sucked up to the US President was even more sickening than the way Tony Blair made himself a poodle of George Bush.

Orchestrated Violence

Away from the fawning over politicians and their entourage, the media took great delight in putting the spotlight on the poor hard done by Police who had to bravely defend private property from hordes of rioting scum.

The media focussed on the Anarchist Black Bloc, or as those who haven’t been poisoned by the propaganda machine call them, undercover Police / special Army units. But, to play along with the media færy tale, the Police did a stalwart job preventing massive destruction by marauding hooligans. They had to detain a few innocent people, but all in all they were magnificent!

The truth is somewhat different. The Black Bloc were allowed by their uniformed colleagues to do some superficial damage to a Royal Bank of Scotland building, at the precise moment a team of journalists had assembled there. How very fortunate indeed! The TV broadcasts showed masked Anarchists attacking a symbol of Capitalism. This obviously contrived event was reminiscent of the Battle of Orgreave in South Yorkshire in 1984.

Same agenda, Same tactics

For those who are unaware of the Battle of Orgreave, it marked a low point for the British media. In a nutshell, British miners were fighting for the existence of their industry, against the Thatcher regime, which was hell, bent of crippling all British Industry so the nation could never again be self-sufficient, but would be enmeshed in the Globalist web of interdependence. The Establishment-serving media demonised the Miners as Communist troublemakers. In fact they were ordinary British Workers fighting for a living. Certainly there were Communist elements in the Unions, but they hardly represented the Workers themselves.

At Orgreave, the Police herded the Miners into a field and then led charge after charge on horseback into the corralled Miners. After inflicting very many and serious casualties on the Miners, they finally began defending themselves by throwing whatever could be found at the Police lines. The media then changed the order of the images so it appeared as if the Police had charged the Miners in response to being stoned by them. This outrageous media manipulation was aired on the BBC1, BBC2 and ITV News programmes (there were only three channels in Britain at the time).

The result? The masses of the British people became hostile to the demonised Miners, and supported the State crackdown. With the most powerful union in Britain smashed, the Government went on to destroy the entire manufacturing and production base of the nation and made Great Britain dependent on imports. This betrayal of sovereignty and destruction of Self-sufficiency was greatly eased by the media complicity is this heinous crime

The Battle of Orgreave


Casualties of G-20

The greatest casualty of G-20 is National Freedom. The Summit was used to push through a whole raft of Globalisation. Arch Globalists including Nicholas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, Gordon Brown and Barack Obama vied with each other for who could commit the most treason against the people they purport to represent.

"This is the day that the world came together to fight back against the global recession, not with words but with a plan for global recovery and reform and with a clear timetable," stated Brown, "I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international cooperation,"

As hailed in the Manchester Guardian, under the agreement, the G20 countries proposed:

• New reforms of the global banking system, including institutions such as hedge funds, and other parts of the so-called "shadow banking system" coming under global regulatory control for the first time

• Tighter regulation for credit rating agencies, to prevent conflicts of interest
• A list of tax havens to be published immediately, and sanctions to be deployed against countries that do not comply with anti-secrecy regulations

• Completion of the creation of international colleges of supervisors for national regulators

• An agreement to do whatever is necessary to promote growth in individual countries, allowing for the possibility of the further use of fiscal stimuli in the future

• The injection of an additional $1tn into the global economy through measures including a $500bn increase in the funding available to the IMF, an increase in the availability of money for developing countries through the IMF's "special drawing rights" to $250bn and a total of $250bn being set aside for trade assistance

• Reform of institutions such as the IMF to allow countries like China to have greater influence. Senior posts at the IMF and the World Bank will open to candidates from the developing world.

• Renewed commitment to the millennium development goals.

• $50bn for the world's poorest countries.

This is pure Globalism. This seemingly innocuos rhetoric translates as the centralisation of all the world’s financial institutions, the criminalisation of economic freedom, the abolition of National Sovereignty insofar as it will be illegal to resist the global financial apparatus, the elevation of the World Bank and IMF to positions of being the only authority to determine economic policy anywhere, and the completion of the Communist-Communitarian Global takeover via the specific inclusion of the Peoples Republic of China as an arbiter of power.

This Summit also acted as a smokescreen for the first phase of the introduction of internal passports within Great Britain. The massive publicity the Summit was given was used to quietly bury the requirement of people travelling between the British Mainland and any of the many islands, to carry ID and register their details with officials. Never in history has travel with the nation been regulated. The justification? The bogeyman of ‘terrorism’.

Another victim was the Ian Tomlinson who died on the street, surrounded by uniformed Police. It is possible that he died of natural circumstances. Of course the British Police would never murder anyone would they? Ask the relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes that. Or for that matter the relatives of the thousands murdered by the State in Northern Ireland by the ‘IRA’ (MI5)

G-20 was a very bad day for freedom. A very bad day indeed.

Warning: G-20 violence will be used to usher in the Police State

Tomorrow, the 2nd April 2009 will see representatives of the financial controllers of the world meet in London for the G-20 Summit. These representatives of Global Usury hide behind the façade of democracy, but the proof of how ‘democratic’ they are can be seen in the security measures they have put in place to keep the enraged public at bay.

The British Police, who are portrayed to the world as unarmed Bobbies, have over the years been transformed into the Brutish Police. Tomorrow will see them at their paramilitary worst. Rather than the fabled lovable Coppers who help little old ladies to cross the road, they will be more like the stuff of nightmares. The stereotypical image, which used to be the reality of British Policing, is sadly now pure fantasy. The Police now more closely resemble a mercenary army, enforcing tyrannical order not protecting the people they claim to serve.

According to the Times of London,

“SCOTLAND YARD is to deploy officers armed with 50,000-volt Taser stun guns to deal with violent demonstrators planning to disrupt this week’s G20 summit in London.

The centrepiece of the security plan will be hundreds of officers from the Metropolitan police territorial support group, who are routinely armed with speedcuffs, extended batons and CS gas spray…they will be supported by officers equipped with Tasers…“There will be an armed response vehicle element to this operation and [those officers] will be carrying Tasers,” said a spokeswoman…All police leave has been cancelled and 10,500 officers, including reinforcements from other forces, will be deployed in the biggest policing operation undertaken in London.“

For those unfamiliar with the Territorial Support Group, this branch of the Police was used in the 1980s to physically beat the Coal Miners, in order to destroy the Unions and the Coal mining industry in Great Britain. This was part of the Globalist agenda to destroy British self-sufficiency in manufacturing and production, thus making the country reliant on imports. Internationalism cannot tolerate Nationhood and Self-Sufficiency.

The G-20 Summit is just a stage in the process to a One World Government. The fact that so much Police manpower is being called in, alongside the vast private apparatus which is being employed, highlights that the Internationalist agenda is not yet complete. Protesters are also mobilising to campaign against the plutocratic depots of the G-20. That is a good thing isn’t it? Well, sadly, looking at the organisations massing in London, the answer is no.

According to the Times, Protest Groups include:

“London Anarchists: (who) have appealed for people to join in “direct action” similar to that seen at previous anti-globalisation protests

Whitechapel Anarchists: London group which praised the attack on the home of Sir Fred Goodwin, the disgraced bank boss

Class War: veteran anarchists who are encouraging supporters to “burn a banker”

G20 Meltdown: A new organisation which will host a carnival at the Bank of England

Climate Camp: environmentalists behind direct action at Heathrow airport and power stations in North Yorkshire and Kent

Climate Rush: group against airport expansion who have “rushed” parliament

People and Planet: student network campaigning to end world poverty, defend human rights and protect the environment

Stop the War Coalition and CND: anti-war protesters against Iraq and Afghanistan wars “

This collection of Environmentalists and Anarchists is actually a faux opposition. The Environmentalist Movement has been hijacked by Internationalists who are actually campaigning FOR a Global Tax to deal with Climate Change. They are pushing the lying propaganda of Al Gore and other Internationalist gangsters. Doubtelss many of them are sincere, but they are sincerely wrong!

The Anarchists in London are just there to cause mayhem. Most, if not all of the ‘leaders’ (sic) of these Anarchist Groups will be MI5 operatives. Class War in particular, are a group who, although they call themselves Anarchists, are really Anarcho-Communists, or to be more precise, well-to-do students playing at rebellion until such time as their Daddies gets them jobs in the City as Bankers and Solicitors. They are sad, pathetic rich kids who like to play at street heroes but don't have a clue that the real enemy is controlling them. I doubt whether any of these Class Warriors has realised that the State want destruction and death on the streets of the capital in order to justify harsh repression, classify protest as terrorism, and complete the Police State. But, of course, to these people, that doesn't matter because they can then slip back into the establishment workplace and officially join the oppressors they feign to oppose.

The strategy of creating an opposition against visible instruments of power has been used the world over. Tomorrow, the only people who will gain from the chaos caused by the controlled opposition, will be the State and the International elite. Anyone tempted to go to London must be aware of the trap being laid. Tomorrow has been orchestrated to create an excuse to usher in the Police Sate our rulers have long dreamt of. If we fall for this trick, it will be a guaranteed victory of Internationalism over Freedom. If you are going, be very, very, careful indeed.

Interesting articles:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/30/cctv-london-government-transport-g20

http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2009/310309G20_plot.htm