The financial aspect of global conquest

"Give me control of a nation's money
and I care not who makes the laws."


- M Amschel Rothschild,
patriarch of the Rothschild Family.

The Rothschild dynasty are the bankers of the international elite. In little over two centuries, the family have amassed half of the wealth of the entire Earth. Clearly they are an important part of the network which we have come to know as the Illuminati (an imperfect label, but one which will suffice for the purpose of naming a network which in truth is multi-faceted and by its nature defies any one label).

There is a very real internationalist agenda, which, if it is to succeed, must see the end of sovereignty for every nation, replaced with the complete interdependency of every part of the world. To paraphrase Amschel Rothschild, all one needs to do to control a nation politically, is to control it financially. The takeover of the world by those who seek to create a single government to rule the masses as serfs on a global plantation is happening right now, and the majority of the media-loving people are blissfully unaware of their impending slavery. To prevent the ordinary people from seeing that this agenda is being fulfilled, war and other diversions are kept in the public eye. As people line up to oppose contrived enemies, the real war against humanity is taking place with barely a murmur of resistance.

There is a common mistake amongst people researching the destruction of freedom worldwide. That mistake is to regard the Rothschild banking cartel as the power behind globalisation. The Rothschilds are a part of the system of internationalism, but only a part. They are assigned the task of financially securing every nation in the world in a web of debt from which they will become unable to escape. This is a vital job, without which the creation of a single global authority would be much more difficult. It is important that we are aware of the machinations of the bankers, but we need to keep their role in perspective.

The progress of the drive to a Single Global Authority is deliberately hidden and confused by the media and propaganda networks which focus attention upon 'enemies' created and/or manipulated for public consumption. However well the agenda is hidden, the success of the Rothschilds cartel at capturing banks worldwide (and specifically national central banks), provides a good indicator of the overall success of the project.

In 2001, there were only seven nations in the world with central banks which were not overtly controlled by the internationalist banking cartel. The seven nations which had not succumbed to the Rothschild dynasty were Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria and the Sudan. In 2004 the globalist mafia's military apparatus, the Armed Forces of the USA and UK, oversaw the establishment of a Rothschild Central Bank in Iraq, having previously established one in Afghanistan. Having invaded and occupied both nations, the US-UK axis handed over financial power to the private banking cartel - both nations had previously had banks owned in the national interest by the State on behalf of the people. In 2006/7 the Wahda Bank of Libya began the process of privatisation. Originally included as one of the nations on the hit list of the Zionist War of Terror, Libya was quietly rehabilitated when it succumbed to the sabre rattling of the Zionist military and sold its central bank to the Rothschilds.

As of 2010, in the western hemisphere, only Cuba is still free of the Rothschilds' grip. In Africa only the Sudan has control of its own central bank.. In Asia, Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Syria remain financially independent. It is no coincidence that the nations subject to Zionist propaganda and under constant military threat are the very nations which are not subject to the diktat of the internationalist in the form of their financial elite, the Rothschilds.

So, how successful have the internationalists been in their bid to financially take over every nation? Not every nation has a central bank, so ascertaining how far the tentacles of the Rothschild banking infrastructure reach is not a simple task. The poisonous vipers of the Rothschild dynasty have become the key economic presence in practically every nation in the world. When one considers that the International Monetary fund and Bank of International Settlements belong in the Rothschild stable, the dominance becomes almost absolute.

What are freedom loving peoples to make of this economic control grid? The professed ideologies of the nations with Rothschild central banks cover the entire left-right spectrum. The concepts of left-wing and right-wing are illusions concocted in the temples of Freemasonry to divide the people into rival camps - camps which they control. The truth of this can be seen by the fact that nations which are avowedly communist sit side by side with those which profess to be the ideological opposite. The left-right game focuses upon keeping the people preoccupied with matters of materialism. The presence of the same banking cartel in nations which are 'enemies' (at face value) betrays the reality that the political classes are mere puppets dancing to the tune of the same financiers, who themselves are little more than instruments in the force for One World Government.

We should now be awakening to the fact that politicians are bought and sold as readily as whores in the red light district, or for that matter as the many Scientists who will generate whatever data is desired to support the Global Warming lie and the resulting call for Global Governance. We need to distance ourselves from people who play the political game and seek to reform the economic structure. We need to think beyond the banking system and to take positive action to disengage from the financial system wherever possible.

The ideal economic system for a free nation is one which is built upon Social Credit and Distributism. This is a plausible and practical alternative economic system which considers the the well-being of the ordinary people and society of the utmost importance. In contrast to the sticking plaster measures of those who are stuck in the Party System (whether through ignorance, naivety or self-serving egomania and greed), the economics of Distributism do not require the election of political puppets for their implementation. A system which sees the exchange of goods and labour as a fluid and natural mechanism (rather than as a Usurious exploitative act of materialistic theft), is what is needed to break the power of the bankers, and to thereby loosen the grip of the international mafia enough for us to throw off their shackles permanently.

As I have said above, the system I speak of is an ideal which does not require a revolution or participation in the political process to achieve. What Distributism entails is a redistribution not of wealth, but of ownership. Wealth based on the accumulation of money is a trick played by the banking elite. Money is created at the stroke of a key, and pursuing wealth is as futile as pursuing the wind. Certainly the illusion of the lifestyles of the rich and famous is one which has been gullibly accepted by the downtrodden masses as something to envy. What is not addressed is the spiritual poverty, and outright evil, which accompanies the worship of material goods .

There are practical steps everyone can take which can lead to economic freedom. Of prime importance is the need to become debt free. For people with mortgages or other large economic commitments this is incredibly difficult. If one looks at a mountain with a view to reaching its summit, the enormity of it can be enough to put any attempt in the realm of fantasy. However, if one makes the objective the conquering of the foothills, then that will be a reasonable goal and one which is not so daunting as to be unachievable. Such must be our thinking - we must view our debts not as a mountain which we cannot overcome, but as a series of hills and inclines which can be overcome one at a time, until we stand above them breathing the clean air of financial freedom.

It is all well and good speaking of economic freedom, but for many people the trap of the materialist system is such that the concept is almost incomprehensible. We need to think and act in practical and achievable ways. As I have said above, dispensing with the burden of debt is a must. This requires a change in thinking. We must ask ourselves whether we really need the material goods which enslave us within the bankers web. We can certainly take steps to walk away from the stranglehold of finance. We must stop using credit cards (unless fortunate enough to be able to pay them off immediately and not pay any interest). Most importantly we must train ourselves to see reality beyond the blinkers placed upon us by the media which manifest in the desire to accumulate luxuries.

We will never achieve financial freedom if we attempt to do so by taking part in the present economic system. The grip of the One World Order over virtually every economy in the world is something we have to address. We cannot hope to compete with them in a game of their own making. This is where alternative economics come into play.

In Berkshire and Lewes (England), from Bayern to Westfalen (Germany) and indeed in many places across the globe, the phenomenon of local currencies is growing as people come to present banking system is simply a fraudulent mechanism for extracting money from the workforce and concentrating the real wealth of the nation in the hands of the banking mafia. Money is created out of thin air in the Fractional Reserve System, thus meaning banks take no risk whatsoever when giving out loans. However, when the banks decide to contract the economy and call in the phantom loans, those who are unable to meet the loans must pay with real goods, properties and/or businesses which are seized by the banks. The local currencies are not built upon Fractional Reserve, thus the weapon of inflation-deflation cannot be used against the public. Community banking takes the Rothschilds and their ilk out of commerce. Without usury, they have no power.

In North Dakota (USA) the State Bank is responsible for issuing currency. Unlike the other 49 States, North Dakota is not tied to the Federal Reserve and as a result the State is flourishing, whilst the rest of the USA is in economic meltdown. The fact that an entire State is functioning very well without the 'help' of the Rothschild's cartel proves that economic freedom at a national level only requires throwing the usurers out of any position of power. If North Dakota can do it, every nation in the world can do it.

Breaking free from the present system is not the stuff of fantasy. From the examples above we can see that economic freedom is not an issue of wishful thinking, but is attainable - and is in many places, for many people, a fact. We are held in our financial servitude through media manipulation. Every time we watch a current affairs programme on the Television or read a 'newspaper' we are confronted with fear mongering, and with pressure to consume more luxuries. We are conditioned to believe that economics is the reserve of an elite who are intellectually superior to ourselves, and that we should not even think of there being an alternative to the status quo. This is simply a lie. It should come as no surprise that Reuters, (which supplies the majority of the world's news) is owned by the Rothschilds. No serious criticism of the Rothschilds or of the banking system will ever be allowed by the media for as long they control it. The wall of silence regarding these matters is a calculated weapon of the internationalists. People who delude themselves into thinking that by reading a variety of newspapers or watching a selection of news sources, they are getting to see the big picture free from media bias, need to think again. The entire mass media is in the pockets of the Rothschilds. A good first step in the march to freedom is to turn off your TV, and leave it off.

We have the power to take back control of our finances. We need to actively participate in local currencies, Credit Unions and Labour Exchange Trading Systems (LETS). We need to stop supporting our oppressors by disconnecting ourselves from their financial web. Once we have built the momentum, the economics of usurious materialism will collapse and a new system of mutual support and social justice will fall into place. By building the post-materialist society now, we can outflank the Rothschilds and make all their efforts at financial conquest futile. Denied the lifeblood of economic control, the entire structure of the One World Order will disintegrate.

Come what may, there is going to be a New World Order. If we procrastinate and allow peddlers of doom such as Alex Jones to keep us in a state of fear and inaction (besides buying their 'resistance' merchandise!), the New World Order that we will see will be a tyranny of materialism, ownership of the masses by the self-chosen elite, unimaginable brutality and a total destruction of all that makes us human. If we take action to free ourselves and all those who we can educate to break themselves free, the New World Order will be a world of free and homogeneous nations, where culture and spirituality are celebrated and commerce is put in its correct place as a function of society, not its purpose. The choice is ours. We have the power.

Tyranny will come if we allow it to by our failure to take action now and build an alternative to the house of cards. A house of cards it may be, but if left unopposed it will turn into a despotic militarised regime which will crush all opposition and literally exterminate those who do not fall into line and accept the tyranny as compliant serfs. We don't have time to debate this issue. We have to act - and act NOW. Let us take Amschel Rothschild's words to heart, and let it be us that control our own money, and all that stems from it.

Go Ogle - the debilitating impact of voyeurism

Voyeurism is regarded as a fetish. It conjures images of masturbating old men, peering from the corner of the curtain to catch a glimpse of a young woman in the street. This description is appropriate for that particular type of voyeur, but it hides the reality of voyeurism. Voyeurism is not limited to a few deviants who like to spy on their neighbours, but is rather a behaviour which has become so commonplace as to be the norm.

Western society has been corrupted by alien influences and degenerates from within for many years. With the advent of television, the decline of culture and morality accelerated. With the internet, that decline has become such that it can be felt to worsen on a near continuous basis.

So what has voyeurism to do with the decline of the West? Is the relationship one of cause, or one of effect? The relationship is in fact both - voyeurism is a result of the decline of Europe, and acts as an accelerant of that decline. The same can be said for other parts of the world which have succumbed to the media age, but analysis of the entire world is far beyond the scope of this article.

Voyeurism is the act of obtaining gratification by observation. It is much more than a non-productive sexual activity. Voyeurs include all those who watch sport on the television but do not actively play. To that end, even people who regularly attend football matches (or any other sport), but do not participate on the field, are voyeurs. They satisfy their need to feel that they belong to the tribe by diverting what is a natural and vital instinct, into watching a game - and in some cases into literally violently opposing those who pledge allegiance to a different team. Football hooligans are obeying a natural drive to defend the tribe - but such is the degeneracy of the West, that rather than defending their families and their people, they commit acts of violence against their kinsmen who wear different colours and have different chants. Can there be anything more ridiculous than a man in a Leeds United shirt kicking unconscious a man in a Manchester United shirt? Yet these oafs take pride in such destructive actions against their compatriots.

Not all sports fans are hooligans, but, with the exception of those who play the sport in question, they are voyeurs. To hear a typical football fan speak after a match, one would be forgiven for thinking that the individual boasting of how 'we won' had actively contributed to the team effort to kick a ball into the opposing goal more often than the other team - rather than in actuality screaming abuse at players in different shirts whilst shouting at the players he idolises. To witness the anger and tears gushed forth by football fans when the favoured team doesn't manage to kick the ball in the desired manner, one would fear for the mental well-being of the individual who doesn't understand the difference between trivial games designed as entertainment, and matters of importance.

The internet has greatly exaggerated sexual voyeurism, and the availability of the most bizarre pornography imaginable (and unimaginable!) Before the arrival of the internet, being 'into' Scat meant having an appreciation for a type of singing found in Jazz music! The easy availability of all manner of pornography has undermined the sanctity of a stable and meaningful monogamous relationship. Whereas the traditional society was built upon marriage with each partner remaining celibate until after the wedding ceremony, and faithful thereafter until the couple were separated by death, the era of mass pornography has introduced the mass of society to un-natural sexual practices which can be explored without taking part. Sadly, this perversion of the mind does lead to a desire to experience the bizarre acts witnessed on the screen. Just as how during the televising of cricket or tennis, the urge to play manifests in a healthy game amongst friends, so with pornography, curiosity manifests in anonymous acts of degeneracy far from the bosom of the family. The diseases thus caught, and the destruction of the bond of monogamy invariably take their toll.

The promotion of promiscuity and perversion are not confined to seedy shops and websites. By far the greater source of the family-destroying material is the television. Politically correct soap operas such as Eastenders and Coronation Street only show perverts in a positive light, with any objectors being painted as bigots, haters, and insane. School children are especially vulnerable to the drive to reduce society to a collection of valueless individuals. In school, children voyeuristically absorb the social conditioning of the indoctrination system which provides no education whatsoever. They are not allowed to question their 'teachers' or to have a different opinion to that which is ordained by the Establishment. They are told that internationalism is desirable, that man made global warming is true, that 9/11 was carried out by Sin-Laden Obama, sorry, Osama Bin Laden, and that it is the child's duty to experiment with many different sexual partners of every race, age, sex, and sexual proclivity. Marriage and family are presented as outmoded and oppressive institutions. Denied the ability to question the lies of the 'education' system, children are reduced to observers of a bizarre cult, which is replicated on the television and due to its pervasive nature, becomes accepted as normal reality.

The music industry has become a driving force for the destruction of society. Britney Spears' 'If You Seek Amy' (F U C K Me), Lady Gaga's 'Poker Face' (Poke Her Face), Beyonce's 'Video Phone', to mention but a few, promote promiscuity to impressionable children. Children are further sexualised by modern Disney films which present 'adult' themes to children, implanting ideas into the subconscious which the child should not be exposed to. Advertising hoardings in the street assault the passer by with imagery which works its way into the mind - corrupting the natural healthy mind with decadent individualist materialism. Again, these media instruments are viewed voyeuristically.

The news media present crime and violence in a sensational manner, which breaks down the horror and revulsion which a healthy individual feels when confronted by the unacceptable. In exactly the same way as people have become desensitised to murder, rape and torture by horror films, so people become desensitised to the crimes of the State which are presented on the news. Before television, a government which stole from the people, enacted policies which they expressly promised not to (such as being pro-immigration, committing wars of aggression against civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia etc), would have provoked mass action, even to the point of revolution. Now, the TV screens corruption and Zionism around the clock, with barely a whimper of indignation.

Voyeurism is a state of mind where the individual observes but does not participate. It creates a desire which must eventually be acted upon. The football fan who is frustrated by not having a real input and thereby is powerless to make his team win, may express this frustration with violence. The child who is lied to by the school system but is prevented from getting his or her point across may become 'anti-social', finding power in rebellion. This rebellion is pre-channelled into hostility to authority which mistakenly becomes hostility to the family. Not being in a position to even fully appreciate the fact that the family is the safe haven from the anti-human society created by the (pseudo-) libertine materialist Establishment, the child unwittingly follows the programming of the media and the indoctrination of the school and becomes promiscuous and immoral - exactly as the Establishment wish.

The West is in a trance. We are sleep-walking our way to oblivion. We have become so used to passively absorbing the diseased programming of the Establishment, that even though we may be aware that something is wrong, the same programming has led us into false rebellions which serve to protect the enemy. All is not lost however. By studying how subliminal control is placed in our homes and streets, we can awaken our minds to the point where subliminals no longer work. By making the effort to participate in sports rather than observing them, we can achieve some personal control, which can then be used as a self-esteem builder which will enable us to shake off the shackles of despondency. Sport is but one option - the individual must fond what he or she enjoys and can use to self-actualise.

Turning off the television and radio, not reading the mass media, listening to wholesome music (maybe to instrumental music), home-schooling our children, participating in the community rather than vegetating in front of the media box - these are just some of the ways we can remove the hypnotic power which keeps our minds enslaved. We cannot avoid all advertising, but we can limit what we are exposed to by not inviting the media into our homes and voluntarily exposing ourselves to their poison.

We are voyeurs. Maybe not sexual voyeurs, but voyeurs nonetheless. This is the key to our psychological enslavement. We are asleep to our peril, but we can easily awaken. Once awake we can never be beaten down. Freed from the oppression of media manipulation we will see the liars and their lies with fresh eyes. Then, they will flee like rats back into the sewers. All we need to defeat our enemies to to wake up and sense our own strength - and see their power for the illusion it is. It really is that simple.

Happy Saint Patrick's. Éirinn go Bráth

17th March is Saint Patrick's Day. As has become the custom, this Saint Patrick's Day will be celebrated by Irish men and women around the globe, and by many non-Irish who just enjoy the opportunity to down a few Guinesses and to indulge themselves in a festival which has become characterised by the tendency drink to excess! However, 2010 is different to previous years, as for the first time since Ireland was occupied by the forces of the Establishment in London, not a single county of Ireland is free.

December 2010 saw the passing into law of the dictatorial Lisbon Treaty. The people of Ireland were blackmailed by treacherous politicians with threats that failure to vote for the Treaty would cause a collapse in the Irish economy. Just three months later, the economy of Ireland is in turmoil thanks to the unworkable Euro currency. The Lisbon Treaty has rendered any hope of freeing Ireland from the Euro the stuff of fantasy.

Ireland has had a troubled history. Occupied by the Internationalist Imperialist cabal in charge of the City of London, Ireland suffered mass starvation and brutality under the heel of the regime which came to be known as the British Government. This brutality was levelled against the common people of all the nations of the British Isles, with the poor of England, Scotland and Wales (etc), just as much as the Irish, being sold into slavery, shipped off to desperate conditions in the prison colonies in Australia, or forced into wage slavery by the anti-human masters of the industrial revolution which marked the complete overthrowal of economic sanity in favour of the despotism of the cult of usury and exploitation. What set the Irish suffering aside was the religious persecution which accompanied the brutality of the rulers.

The tragic history of Ireland under British control mirrors that of Great Britain herself. The Royal Family of England abandoned Christianity in order to make themselves the high priests and priestesses of a new religion which enshrined Man as God, placing special emphasis upon the material over the spiritual. This Cult of Edom, cynically labelled the Church of England, turned Christianity on its head. Many heroic men and women were martyred for refusal to accept the new religion of the Monarchy. Just like Druidism and the other religions of the Isles which predated the arrival of Christianity, Christianity itself was brutally suppressed and forced underground. Ireland remained a sanctuary for Christians until the despots based in London sent forth their mercenaries to the Emerald Isle to rape, murder and enslave the population into submission to the new faith of usury and commerce.

Ireland was brutalised to such a horrific extent that not even the full force of British censorship could hide the atrocities from the world outside British control. Propaganda in Great Britain coloured the Irish as savages and thieves, whereas in fact it was the Irish, like the British peasants before them, who had their land stolen from them by the savage servants of the British Monarchy. A particularly sad aspect of the criminal assault by the foot soldiers of the murderous Monarchy, was that by manipulating information, the British Establishment created a false image of Christian Ireland as an enemy of the people of Great Britain. In truth, had the reality of the oppression of the Irish by the ruling class in London been known by the ordinary Britons, it could have been the catalyst required to spark a revolution to free all the peoples of the Isles from the serpents of the Establishment. The censorship and outright lies of the Monarchy, their puppet politicians and clergymen created a surreal situation in which the Britons of Great Britain came to identify with their alien oppressors and despise their downtrodden brothers and sisters in Ireland.

The resilience of the Irish in the face of the armed butchers of the London occupation regime was such that in the province of Ulster, a colony of radicalised Presbyterian Scots was planted to displace and divide the Irish. To emphasise their imperialist rule, Irish place names were replaced with English ones, such as Coleraine which became Londonderry. Saint Patrick, who brought Christianity to Ireland, was himself a Scot. Whereas Saint Patrick took Christianity to Ireland and symbolically threw out the serpents of paganism, the Scots planted in Ulster by the occupation regime brought an evil anti-Christ cult which sort to eliminate Christianity and enshrine the serpent of Edom in its place.

The ethnic identity of the people of Northeast Ireland is interesting and frustrating. Propagandists against Irish unity have created a myth that the province of Ulster is ethnically different to the other provinces. To justify the argument that Ulsterman are not like the Irish from below the border, the issue of the establishment of a plantation in the North of Scots from the West of Scotland is cited. However, those who were moved en masse to Ulster, originally came from Ireland, from where they had emigrated in waves from the 5th Century. (The name Scotland is derived from the Latin word for the Irish, 'Scotti'.) The transfer of people back and forth across the narrow divide between Scotland and Ireland has been virtually continuous. To argue that the Ulster folk are not really Irish is disingenuous - they are the same people. The Scotti of Ireland ARE the Scots of lower Scotland.

Accepting that there is no ethnic reason why Ireland should be divided, the issue of religion is used. This is another false reason. The Presbyterian Scots who were planted by the Crown were put there in order to wreck Irish unity, however, over time, the newcomers were to realise their commonality and become key figures in the resistance to the tyrants in London. Had it not been for the economic reliance of the Belfast workers upon the capitalist hub in Great Britain, Ireland would have gained freedom in its entirety after the Great War. The tactic of fomenting religious division in order to bolster the rule of the British Monarchy failed, but the economic division which had its roots in the materialist mindset succeeded, and the industrialised 6 counties within Ulster remained under British rule when the rest of Ireland achieved freedom. (This freedom was a red-herring as the Masonic Lodges which serve the Monarchy had become entrenched throughout Ireland making independence a front for the continuation of rule by the Royalty.) Partition was not due to allegiance to the Crown, as we are supposed to believe - it was solely due to economic factors.

Following the collapse of the shipping industry, the rationale for the 6 counties remaining apart from the 26 counties of the Irish Republic dissipated. It was at this point that gangsters such as Iain Paisley (a foul man who bought himself the title 'Reverend') latched onto the idea of exaggerating the old religious differences and resentments to drive a wedge between the Christian Irish and the descendants of the planted Scotti. Freemasons from brother lodges contrived a fake religious problem and set about corralling the population of the North of Ireland into rival community factions. Mimicking the Masonic flag of the Republic, the factions were assigned the rival colours of Green and Orange, with the Luciferian controllers steering each faction, as indicated by the white panel which sits at the centre of the tricolour. The Monarchic Establishment in London, through its mercenaries and agents in the (green) Provisional Irish Republican Army, and the (orange) Ulster Volunteer Force, began a campaign of terror which killed thousands of ordinary people and wrecked the lives of many thousands more.

Using the manufactured terrorist threat as an excuse, the London Establishment enacted ever harsher measures of population control. The London regime through its MI5 assets in the PIRA and UVF, conducted psychological warfare on the people. The atrocities endured by the Irish were soon extended to the British mainland and to a lesser degree, the Irish Republic. From these exercises in terror, MI5 was able to put into practice various theories for the mental destruction of resistance to tyranny, and indeed for methods to create willing support for despotism. In exactly the same way that the MI5-MOSSAD-CIA orchestrated New York massacre on the 11th September 2001 was used to dæmonise Muslims and give Police State powers to the State, the MI5 bombings of Britons across the Isles was used to dæmonise the Irish and to turn the British 'Bobby' into the jack-booted enforcer of mafia-esque legislation which is represented by the British Police of today.

Dæmonising the Irish had the effect of creating a scapegoat which could be beaten whenever the Establishment needed a distraction. Many Britons, justifiably enraged at atrocities attributed to the Irish, and egged on by anti-Irish propaganda on the BBC, began to believe the lies they were sold and began to treat the ordinary Irish as terrorists. Likewise the Irish who were on the receiving end on 'loyalist' atrocities began to support those who falsely claimed to be anti-British. During the height of the terrorist bombings, as MI5 murdered Britons and Irishmen, hatred of one another replaced critical analysis. At this time, ever more draconian laws were enacted, and the surveillance society began in earnest.

Whilst Irishmen chanted 'No Surrender to the IRA', or 'Troops Out', and sang ditties about the criminal Zionist, William of Orange, the Irish Republic and the United Kingdom simultaneously progressed along the path of integration into the European Economic Community, now the European Union. As the controlled media screened images of suffering, the issue of whether Ulster should be governed by London or Dublin, or even Stormont, became irrelevant. All the while the pantomime played on, with puppets such as Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley publicly berating one another (although not in the Lodge!); with safety valve parties such as the BNP and National Front leafletting and stickering swathes of the UK with literature proclaiming Ulster to be British forever; with defiant murals against the British Army being painted on gable ends across Belfast; with people the length and breadth of the British Isles focusing on the enemy created for them; with sincere but misguided activists wasting time playing their parts. Even now the game continues.

17th March is the day we remember Saint Patrick, Patron Saint of Ireland, Christian and proud Scot. On this day, amidst the drinking and merry-making we must remember the suffering caused by the Royal Family of Europe (yes Family, they are all related). We must look at the current 'terrorist' threat being presented - at the scapegoating and dæmonisation of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, of Islam - and the truth of who really is committing atrocities which the Muslims are currently being blamed for. For Celtic Britons and Irishmen we must recall that we are one people divided against one another by our common enemy - the British Crown. We must wake up to the fact that whilst we have been distracted by the deadly circuses of MI5, our sovereignty has gone and our nations have been over-run by immigrants who are not of our kin. We have been lied to, manipulated into supporting rival factions which only exist to serve the internationalist Police State. Worst of all, we have aided our enemies and attacked our own.

Saint Patrick's Day 2010 is different because Ireland as a nation no longer exists, nor does the United Kingdom - yet still pressure valves like the National Front fight the battle of shadows. We let this happen because we believed the media and the Government, and the other fronts of the Royal power. We must wake up and refuse to fall into the trance again. We are one - Irish, English, American, Russian - EUROPEAN. The Ulster conflict is over. Ireland IS united. They now have new terrorist threats and climate scares to distract us. If we can learn from the experience of being lied to on such a scale, we can resist the new lies and stop the Internationalist cabal. From adversity comes strength.

Happy Saint Pat's!

The reality of working in the public sector

Around the world, political correctness is replacing common sense. Organisations such as Common Purpose exist in most nations, with the shared goal being to the creation of a single bureaucratic system at the administrative level. This uniform bureaucracy is the instrument for the implementation of Fabianism which seeks to replace freedom of speech with absolute self-censorship, and freedom of thought with no thought whatsoever.

Much has been written about the intrigues of Common Purpose and the horrendous effects of Political Correctness and the Communitarian ideology. There is a belief that those within the system are willing accomplices. In some instances this is true, but for many, the opposite is the case. As someone who works from within the beast, I would like to share my typical daily experience.

My working day begins as does most people's, save only for most people inflicting upon their minds the poison of television. I leave my house and join the herd of indentured slaves who comprise the workforce. Like my fellow drones I am monitored for most of my journey by the sea of cameras atop the traffic lights which impede my progress along the road. In addition, as I enter the legal and financial district (interestingly based in the same area, betraying the truth of who controls the nation), my car is filmed by hundreds of CCTV cameras. This surveillance continues right up to the door of the building I work in. I could add that for many of my colleagues, this surveillance is reinforced by the GPS in their in-car satellite navigation and mobile telephones (or as Americans call them, 'cells').

Upon entering the building I am filmed by the internal monitoring system. The mass of cameras are fitted with microphones, adding a further dimension to the level of intrusion. For the entire day, not only will my every move be filmed, but my every word will be recorded. Like every other member of staff, I have a security door operator which contains my unique identification information. This, alike all the other measures, is ostensibly a device for heightening the level of security afforded the building, in order to protect the sensitive data held on the general public who are engaged with this particular aspect of the State. However, are the public really protected by the monitoring of how many times I visit the kitchen to make a drink, or how often, and for how long I visit the toilet? Every door is fitted with a security lock which is operated by an electronic i.d. recogniser - this is but another surveillance gathering mechanism. Before taking up my post, I have to sign in - further enhancing the level of data as to my activities. This replication of submission to surveillance is a psychological weapon for ensuring that at no time during the day does anyone forget that he or she is being monitored.

Although not a daily occurrence, meetings are a very common feature of the working week. At these, the current policy from Central Government is passed down. This changes weekly (if not more often) and affects the very minutiae of work. This ensures that no-one can become comfortable in the workplace, and that everyone is alert to the fact that no decisions can be made without recourse to higher levels of the bureaucratic chain. Policy reversals are continuous and concern every imaginable aspect of work. This ensures a complete sense of powerlessness, regardless of the position of the worker in the structure.

Meetings invariably incorporate a degree of 'training' which rather than being training to improve the ability to deliver a quality service to the public, tends to be a further spoon-feeding of political correctness. Recent examples of this have been sessions on 'negative words' which cause hurt and offence. Even staff who have no direct contact with the public are forced to endure such tedium. Needless to say, staff are monitored to ensure that forbidden words are not uttered. The negative impact of this upon worker morale is tangible. Such is the intrusive surveillance that aside from the extremists on the staff who embrace such lunacy (mainly because being such types as benefit from it), that open criticism of political correctness is commonplace, albeit qualified so as to not invite disciplinary measures. Doublespeak has mutated within the public sector into a manner for discussing its stupidity without referring to it directly.

Back in the office, the surveillance continues. The computer system is set up so as to allow remote viewing of every computer, in much the same way as the CCTV can be remotely viewed via secure internet connections. This ensures that workers only use the computers for work. This is of course reasonable. However, the monitoring is not restricted to work time, and even though staff are allowed to use the internet before work, or during breaks, the monitoring continues at all times. The result of this is that personal emails are recorded, as are visits to social sites such as Facebook. Up until recently, random checks of internet use were sporadic, making internet usage relatively safe. This has now been replaced by complete recording of all activity. Personally I no longer use the internet at all at work, and in this I am not alone. Resentment to the Big Brother State is growing within the belly of the beast itself.

So what is to be made of this surveillance and attempted political indoctrination? Ironically, the more the State removes power to make decisions, the more it shifts policy so as to remove any sense of solid purpose, the more is encroaches on the privacy of the staff, so the more easy it makes the overthrowal of the politically despotic regime.

There is a myth that Civil Servants and other public sector employees are politically neutral. For practical purposes, with regards to the daily working environment, this myth is for the most part a reality. There are certainly a few agitators who take every opportunity to advance their philosophical positions, but in the main, most of the workers keep their opinions private. The typical public servant is so used to policy changing with no reason given, that whatever is desired by the State is implemented. Therein lies the flexibility of the system, and the weakness of the internationalist mafia who presently preside over the central authority in Bruxelles and its provincial arm in London. I suspect the same can be said in most countries.

I have written repeatedly about how dire our situation is. However, we must not get despondent. The beauty of bureaucracy is that the control freakery from on high is so pervasive that it generates hostility at every level of the chain. An administration which relaxed the controls and allowed for the workers to use common sense in decision making would be welcomed by the public sector as a whole. The hated Communitarian system would collapse overnight once the despots at the top were removed. No public servant (with the exception of the rabid Marxist minority) would be sad to see the ideology of the internationalist criminals overturned. For some it would simply be another change in policy, for many it would be a welcome return to sanity.

The system seems to be a solid immovable force, against which there is no hope. Nothing could be farther from the truth. There is too much despair and fear-mongering amongst the defenders of freedom and decency. We need to take another look at what we are fighting. It appears to be immovable because that is the propaganda that it pushes through its collaborators and stooges (such as Alex Jones for example). Our enemy is only powerful in image. Without our support it is nothing. Take hope and strength in the knowledge that the un-natural situation we are enduring is hated by those who work within the system as much as any other sector of society. We can permanently banish political correctness and internationalism once we accept that the tiger is made of paper.

Take hope. The power of our enemy is an illusion. We have real power. We can, and must, win.