Gaza and Dunkirk: Flotillas of Zionism

As I write, a flotilla of small ships is sailing in the Mediterranean, it's mission to bring aid to a people devastated by Zionist persecution. Seventy years ago another flotilla was sailing on the other side of Europe in the English Channel. The two flotillas would appear at first glance to have little in common, however they inextricably are bound together.

In 1940, the Zionist puppet masters were testing a new method of warfare, known as Blitzkrieg. The nation chosen to test this technique was Germany. The banking cartels had used the Great War of 1914-18 to smash the empires of continental Europe. This was followed by the postwar depression in which the nations impoverished by debt to pay for four years of suicidal fraternal slaughter, were economically raped. The proposed world government of the League of Nation failed and so another war was needed to further the goal of centralising power in the hands of an elite few at the expense of the destruction of nationhood and freedom.

The mighty European nation of Russia had been taken over by the forces of international materialism. In order to complete the destruction of Europe, a controlled opponent had to be created - this was to be Germany. In 1918 Germany had been economically crippled and physically dismembered by the Zionist war machine in London and Washington. Funded by the Zionist banking cartel, Germany had reversed its alien-created decline and become the strongest economy in Europe. The territorial losses had also been overturned, and the Hitler regime in Berlin was enjoying support hitherto unknown in a modern nation. The Blitzkrieg was achieving results beyond the expectations of the internationalists who had funded the regime, and a quick victory for Germany seemed assured. That did not fit the internationalist agenda.

In 1940, Germany had subdued the opposition to the west. The objective of the war was to destroy the independent nations of Europe so that the shattered lands could be welded together into a single European superstate. For this to be achieved, Germany had to be utterly crushed. To the horror of the Rothschilds, the Blitzkrieg was so successful that every combatant nation had capitulated, with the exception of Great Britain, and her military were trapped in the vicinity of Dunkirk. All that was required to end the war in the west was for the German army to advance to the coast and cut off any possibility of retreat across the sea. This was precisely what the German High Command set out to do, and would have done had it not been for the direct intervention of Zionist asset, Adolf Hitler.

Hitler had repeatedly, and accurately, proclaimed the British Establishment to be completely controlled by international Jewry, aka Talmudic/Sabattean Jews and Zionists. Had he been sincere in his oft stated desire to liberate Europe from the evils of usury, he would have allowed the army to capture the British and French soldiers, and ended the war. Instead, he ordered the German military to allow the British and allied forces to cross the sea unhindered in a flotilla of little ships, supported by the Royal Navy. His stated reason was to allow the British to keep their dignity and show that the German regime was honourable! This is lunacy. It made absolutely no sense to allow enemy forces to escape so they could fight on - at a time when he had opened up another front in the east and drastically reduced the chances of Germany winning.

As a direct result of allowing the flotilla of ships to leave from Dunkirk, the fate of Europe was sealed. The internationalists got their wish, and what should have been a quick war was dragged on for a further five years, leaving Europe financially in ruins, with many of her finest men and women dead or psychologically broken. The aftermath was not only the destruction of free Europe and the enslavement of her people to international bureaucratic materialism (openly in the USSR, more subtly in the area which was to become the EU), the war was also used to justify the establishment of a materialist state in Palestine which would serve as the centre of operations of the internationalist elite, behind the lie of it being a homeland for persecuted Jews.

The flotilla of ships in the Mediterranean attempting to bring much needed supplies to the people of terrorised occupied Gaza is a direct consequence of the flotilla of ships which left Dunkirk seventy years ago in order for the Zionist plan to destroy Europe and create Israel to succeed. Hitler, acting in a way which the MOSSAD would envy, deceived the people of Europe with his claim to moral superiority to justify allowing the Franco-British Zionist army to escape. The only purpose of this was to prolong the war and ensure the establishment of a supremacist Rabbinical abomination which negates true Judaism and persecutes the Arab people whose land it occupies.

The two flotillas of the end of May 1940 and 2010 follow one another in logical sequence. It is a great irony that many in the Arab world look to Hitler as an enemy of Zionism. He was the best asset Zionism ever had - without his loyalty to the cause and treachery to Europe, their goal for a single global authority would have not have advanced so rapidly. Had Hitler been genuinely fighting for Europe, the Talmudic Defence Force, known as the British Expeditionary Force, would have been captured and the soldiers released from servitude to Zion and brought back into the European fold. Without the flotilla from Dunkirk, the Sabatteans would have lost and Gaza would still be a safe and happy home for the indigenous Arab population, without the constant fear of Zionist brutality.

Hitler has a lot to answer for.

Hitler was a fraud to the end

Nationalist history teaches that Hitler was an enemy of the Zionist Jews and a hero to Germany and all of Europe. The opposite is the truth. Now even mainstream newspapers are recording the treason of Hitler to the people of Europe. The following article from yesterday's Diario Montañés is but one more in a line of reports exposing Hitler as an internationalist and enemy of freedom....

http://www.eldiariomontanes.es/v/20100519/sociedad/destacados/hitler-refugio-cantabria-20100519.html

'Democracy' as applied to Public Servants

All dedicated servants of the Crown are bound to keep internal memoranda and directives secret. There are various pieces of legislation which keep those in the Civil Service and broader Public Service from exposing the lunacy which is our daily experience. Through the imposition of fear of prosecution, the overwhelming majority of people in the employ of the State keep silent about even the most extreme abuses committed against the people by the Establishment.

Working within the system can be distressing. At times, the madness of those who sit at the top of the hierarchy can almost be overwhelming, at others it can be a catalyst for action. Working on the inside, one is daily forced to look evil in the eye.

There are willfully sick individuals who work for the Establishment, but they comprise only a very small minority. These parasites on humanity are so debased that they cannot but cause a reaction of resistance amongst the decent people they work with. The whole edifice of the Establishment is maintained by draconian legislation and economic blackmail of its employees. This makes the Establishment vulnerable, and ultimately makes the long term imposition of its tyranny impossible.

With the current political farce playing out in the United Kingdom, the following two paragraphs are parts of internal directives issued concerning the General Election. Information which relates to individuals and identifiable aspects of the Civil Service have been removed. However, that withstanding, the paragraphs may serve to give a glimpse of the constraints imposed on public employees....

'Now the general election has been announced we have entered the pre-election period known nationally as “purdah”. This is a political convention which formally applies to government ministers and civil servants before an election. It ensures all candidates are on an equal footing in the run up to the elections. The Department should remain politically impartial at all times. The organisation and its staff should treat any candidate or party in the same way. Every statement or action will be under intense scrutiny therefore special care should be taken. Staff should not engage in activities which are likely to call into account the political impartiality of the organisation. Staff should not engage in activities which could result in others thinking public resources are used for political activity. Staff should not use work premises or equipment if they are engaging in political debate in their own time. They should also not make comments based on information that is not generally available to the public.'

(Directive update 7.5.10)

'Last night’s general election results mean that staff should continue to not engage in any activity which calls into question the political impartiality of the organisation. Pre-election rules (known as purdah), which normally only apply to a pre-election period, will remain in place until a new administration is formed. Staff should be careful not to take part in anything which could result in criticism that public resources are being used for party political purposes. '

These directives may seem reasonable, but they should be considered in connection with the unwritten directives which have been issued during the election campaign. Throughout the campaign, members of staff have been harangued by higher officers in the organisation. Although the above written edicts dictate that political impartiality must be maintained, in truth, members of staff have been subjected to near constant political manipulation. Perhaps this is the reason that the warning against acting in a manner which may alert the public to public money being spent for political purposes appears in both directives.

Colleagues from my Department were told that we MUST vote for the Labour Party to protect our jobs (the Conservative Party has pledged to scrap much of the public service). This political blackmailing is not confined to my particular Department, but is spread across the public sector. Friends from other parts of the public sector have been subjected to the same tactic of appealing to personal greed to garner votes for the party of the old administration. Employees in areas as diverse as the Court Service, Employment Services, Education and Health have experienced the same underhand tactics and fear-mongering.

When one considers that around 25% of British workers are employed to some degree by the State, were public employees the automatons that they are supposed to be, the Labour administration would have been returned to power by a massive margin. That this is not the case is a very positive indicator of the fragility of the house of cards which is the establishment, and should give strength to those who oppose the anti-human mafia.

The General Election is a pantomime act. On the plus side, a substantial percentage of people have not voted as their masters ordered. On the minus side, many people have still voted! If people are awake to the manipulation, that is a step towards seeing the fraud in its entirety. Whilst witnessing the masses going to the polls like sheep is depressing, there is yet hope - we need to nudge them from partial awareness to fully conscious awareness of the lies being sold to them. This task is vital, and observing the discontent in the people as a whole, is ripe for the accomplishment.