Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Bureaucratic Despots: Serving Finance; Destroying Culture

Travelling eastwards from  Liverpool, one cannot fail to appreciate the clear cultural difference between the counties of Lancashire and Yorkshire.  The two powerhouses of the Industrial Revolution have become materially impoverished in comparison with the richer South of England, but in spite of the financial rape of the North, each county has survived with a unique culture and pride in its heritage.  This is surprising when one considers the total disregard for the cultural and historical character of the counties of England, by the Establishment which reigns from within the national boundaries.
Lancashire has been dismembered with no regard for the people of the county.  The northern area of Furness was amputated in the 1974 electoral boundary reforms, and merged into the new region of Cumbria, alongside the ancient counties of Westmorland and Cumberland; the latter a county which in more Scottish than English, and remains south of the border for political rather than cultural reasons.  In the south of Lancashire, the despots moved Liverpool and Manchester into new city counties (incorporating other towns from outside Lancashire), and the town of Warrington was simply pushed into Cheshire.  Cheshire and Lancashire are culturally very different, but to the despots in London, this matters not one iota.  In the east, parts of the county such as Todmorden were pushed into Yorkshire.

Crossing the border into Yorkshire, one enters another historic county which has been butchered by the London regime.  The county dates back as a unified geographical unit back to 626 following the annexation of Dunoting, Elmet and Meicen to the core lands of Ebrauc and Deywr in the Nation of Deira, (itself formed a century earlier from an even older nation of the same name).  Incorporated into the Kingdom of Northumbria alongside the Nation of Bernicia, Deira maintained its identity throughout, and following the end of Northumbria and the establishment of England on the 12th July 927,  continued right until 1974 when the the butchers in London ripped the historical county of Yorkshire apart; abolishing the traditional and authentic Ridings (Old English 'Thriving', 1/3), replacing them with artificial counties and districts defined by bureaucrats in London with no concern for over thirteen centuries of history and culture.

The 1974 Electoral Commission was an attack upon the historical and cultural ties of the counties in the UK to the people.  The pre-1974 counties  have since been further attacked by a series of reforms, all justified as being necessary to enhance democracy.  Bureaucratic administrative authorities were given priority over organic cultural entities.  In a people-focused nation the State and its administrative organisation exist to serve the people and their cultural soul - that the opposite is the case in the UK highlights the nature of the anti-natural system of government.  It is interesting that in all the reforms of the administrative divisions across the UK, one part of the territorial British mainland has remained unaffected; that part is the City of London - the Square Mile from which the despots rule over the UK, and guide their minions across the globe in the construction of an international materialist order.

Drawing lines on maps with no thought for the people affected by frontier changes is indicative of the mentality of the Establishment.  The experience of the people of the UK who live in the fringes of historical counties and find their official identities changed to suit the despots in the City, equate with the experiences of people worldwide who have been similarly disregarded.

In Africa, the imperialists drew lines on the continental map and created false nations out of thin air.  The Talmudic racist ideology that Africans are sub-human, legitimated the theft of African land.  In addition, organic territorial boundaries were ignored and people from culturally and historically distinct tribes founds themselves thrown into single administrative areas, labelled as nations, but with no legitimacy (being no more than markings on paper).  Unrest and warfare resulting from incompatible peoples being corralled into the same living space, has been used to further stigmatise the people and reinforce the Talmudic myth that people in Africa are uncivilised and warlike.  This is the chutzpah of Talmudism; label people as materialists, then steal their resources and force them to compete in the materialist system of your creation; label people as warlike, then create the conditions for war.  What better way to make people fight than to impoverish them to the point of starvation and then force them to share the precious few available commodities with people with whom they have no bonds of kinship?

The internationalists have created unrest in every nation where they have created artificial national and local borders.  In the north of Ireland, Irishmen have been trapped inside the UK against their wishes, sharing land with people who identify with the UK and resent their presence.  In Yorkshire, the Lancastrian town of Todmorden is governed by the remote 'Calderdale' authority; a Culturally Marxist entity which has no respect for the culture of Yorkshire, let alone the indigenous Lancastrian, even Burnley, spirit of Todmorden.  In the east of Europe, the great city of Lvov is governed by the Ukraine, and not by Poland.  Line-drawing imperialists with no understanding of, or even desire to understand, local customs, have wrecked every nation they have touched.

In Serbia, the international finance imperialists have created the rogue state of Kosovo, on Serbian soil.  Kosovo is the cradle of Serbia so to remove it from the motherland is to tear out the heart of the nation.  The people of Serbia have been brutalised by NATO and have had a drug-dealing terrorist state placed on their soil.  The reaction of NATO to the protests of the Serbian people has been more violence and bloodshed.



Whether it is through enforced multiculturalism, or military conquest, the same bureaucratic mentality prevails.  The internationalists who bomb Islamic nations, creating floods of refugees to Europe, are the same people who create laws which discriminate against the indigenous people in favour of the new-comers.  It isn't the Muslims who are to blame for Political Correctness and multi-culturalism; it is the Talmudic Establishment.  The likes of the EDL who believe they are fighting for the indigenous way of life, are useful idiots; they attack the Muslim symptom and defend the Talmudic cause.

To the Talmudist, all outside the Tribe are the same, and should be treated in the same unfeeling manner.  The Talmudic religious faith passed into European thought through Marxism; Talmudism for the Goyim.  The people who draw lines on maps and declare new authorities without care to consider indigenous sensibilities, do so from a position of believing that all people are the same.  This is absolute lunacy.  All people are different.  The mis-use of the word 'equal' is designed to confuse the issue by placing people who can see the Talmudic lie for what it is, in the camp of supremacist bigots.

The hypocrisy of the internationalists who operate from the City of London can best be seen in their pet creation, Israel.  Defined as a Jewish State, Israel is exempt from the multi-culti thought control which is enforced on all Europeans.  The bond between land and people is fully understood by the Talmudists, which is why Israel has been ethnically-cleansed of the vast majority of non-'Jews'.  The process of creating a mono-ethnic Israel is the reverse of the enforced multi-culturalism imposed by Talmudists in Europe; with the irony that in each case the indigenous people are losing their land and being disconnected from their traditions and ancestry.

In Yorkshire, the people refused to accept the abolition of the East Riding.  The non-county of Humberside has now gone, although the Establishment still insist on referring to the 'region of Yorkshire and the Humber'.  The county of Middlesex refuses to die and the abomination of Calderdale has failed to break the spirit of Todmorden.  

All people are linked to the soil of the ancestors, and so long as we honour them by refusing to kowtow to Cultural Marxism, we remain strong.  The non-State of Belgium is failing through the non-cooperation of the people.  All over the world new nations are being born; they are not new, but ancient nations reasserting their right to exist.  Internationalists see people as economic units.  Their abject failure to understand the importance of land, culture, history and spiritual matters leads them to act through the basest strategy; war.

The revival of Tribal Africa; the strengthening of Flemish identity; even the continuing loyalty to the Red Rose in Yorkshire-occupied Todmorden - all these avowals of human identity should give us strength.  The internationalists rule by fear and violence, and a reliance on human stupidity.  Their rule cannot continue if we refuse to play their games.  The solution to internationalism is localism/tribalism and non-compliance with the anti-humans who cannot understand the real value of humanity.  They will fail.  They already have.  Their reliance on economic and military persecution is proof of this.  The internationalists' demise is certain but the longer they continue to dictate our laws, economics and social systems, the more damage they can inflict on us.  It is time to increase our efforts and restore control to our own communities, free from the influence of our enemies.  Ultimately they have the military capability of destroying the planet.  Can we afford to let these maniacs run amok much longer?

Patrick Henry in his famous address on the fight against the Talmudic menace in the City of London, declared  'Give me liberty or give me death'.  We have to ensure that Liberty is restored or there will not be a choice, Death will be all that awaits. 

84 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kernow is a case in point, not only are they subsumed in a Devon/Cornwall absurdity, but as a country they are considered a COUNTY within another country!

Anonymous said...

You know who I am. I can see my ideas having influence on your thought, as exemplified by your opening line about two closely located counties in northern England still possessing different cultures.

I agree with you about Africans. I spoke to a black African immigrant just last week and the conversation was just fine, he was a nice guy. I agree with you regarding Serbia and Northern Ireland as well.

I can also see that your idea that "all outside the Tribe are the same" may be based on comments that I have made regarding the left and its disrespect for the genuine cultural diversity within Europe, and its varying cultures.

Am I influencing you or am I not?

Distinct cultures do exist, but sometimes the previous county boundaries do not mean that much.

As an example, take the ex-Scottish county of Sutherland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutherland

I was there within the past fortnight, as well as Caithness:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caithness

There are very few immigrants in these areas. There are also very few jobs in these areas (aside from the Dounreay nuclear plant). I do wonder if in the future, settlements here will become ghost towns...

If there is anything that exemplifies the destruction of Western societies, it is the towns that once had some industry and then have declined. It's all over to China and the other powers now, to the corporations. Many from across the political spectrum would agree.

Anonymous said...

Read this article from the Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/sep/14/uk-unemployment-hit-million-mark

Really, the unemployed from across all ethnic groups in the UK are suffering. That is true.

But when I suggested that to a one-world Marxist guy that I know, he said that that doesn't matter; they should count themselves lucky because they have food unlike those in Ethiopia and Somalia and various other places. This same individual vehemently rejects the idea of biological inequality and states that the disappearance of white people in the long run is a good and moral thing.

Anonymous said...

Leftism is essentially feminine. Compassion is a female characteristic at heart. When this individual said that Marxism was about "creating a better world", he actually said this phrase in a feminine tone, slowly and using a varied pitch. This was a clear-cut case of DRoFC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_East_Africa_drought

I have absolutely no obligation to help these individuals. Those in the West who rage at me making this statement, I will rage against myself.

Rufus said...

Kernow exemplifies the tyranny of the City of London imperialists. The language has been suppressed to the point where no one knows for certain how to pronounce every word. In spite of this, the identity remains. David Cameron remarked that the boundary between Cornwall and Devon (by which he should have said Kernow and England) is the river Tamer, not the Amazon. His attitude is typical of those who seek to belittle tradition with absurdities, seeking to erase kernow by pointing to the border being a small river! Cameron is alike to the rest of the Establishment in having no empathy with the human beings he rules over.

Anonymous 2: We had lengthy discussions on the other site and of course I am pleased to learn and to expand my understanding. Sharing ideas leads to growth. To paraphrase, I am seeking the truth and happy to travel with fellow truth seekers, but I whole-heartedly mis-trust anyone who claims to have found it! We are on a journey, and it is good to learn and to discuss. I welcome your input as ever, and reiterate my hope to see you writing in depth articles.

Marxists think differently to decent people. Their economic determinism places material matters above humans. they have no human feeling and no respect for culture, nation, religion or individual freedom. Their oft touted claim that their theory will bring the end of history indicates how remote from reality they are. Their hope to see white Europe die contrasts with their defence of indigenous minorities such as the Amerindians or Australian Aborigines. All peoples should be protected. Singling out one people for extermination speaks volumes.

Street level leftism may be motivated by a distorted sense of compassion, but at heart it is about economic dominance, and really isn't bound to either gender in the major ethnic groups of the world. Leftism is Talmudism. The street sellers of the Socialist Worker would argue the toss, but they are pushing Jewish racism, pure and simple.

Anonymous said...

There is a programme on tonight 9pm on BBC2 called "Mixed Britain" about how 'mixed race' people are one of the fastest growing census groups in the UK. I'm not going to watch it because, for me, that would be akin to torture, but think of the sheer mass psychological damage they're doing to women's minds with this sort of propaganda, and the resulting intensification of male breeding competition and genetically destructive effects.

Anonymous said...

If it's so good to be mixed race, why are the vast majority (90%+) of the most popular porn actresses of unmixed European ancestry?

http://www.freeones.co.uk/baberank/

Why don't the porn producers go hunting for young women in West Africa instead of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania? After all, all human races are equal, aren't they? You could probably pay those women less for the porn shoots as well, as the income would go further.

The truth is that pornography represents the corpse of European Christian civilization.

Anonymous said...

An important and highly significant cultural comment has been swallowed up by the spam filter.

Anonymous said...

The central banks, such as the Bank of England (which operates for the whole of the UK), the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, all derive their policies from usury.

In essence it is about creating nations that are in debt, and making nations suffer. It is masochism, similar to self-harm such as those who stick a knife into their arm and enjoy it.

All ethnic groups within Western countries will suffer as a result of this, immigrants and their descendants and natives alike.

The world pre-globalization was a lot happier and more authentic.

You have to wonder... how long is it before the supermarkets stop supplying food and there is a mass starvation. It could happen.

Anonymous said...

The most important element of any nation is the people. Leftists will deny this importance staunchly and often angrily.

Having the indigenous population replaced by an alien group is inauthentic (and, not to mention, genocidal, just without the brutal killings but the effect is identical). The Caribbean islands are known to feature majority black populations, but were originally inhabited by American Indian tribes.

There are lots of small towns in Britain that are mostly white (i.e indigenous), yet these are also likely to be the places where there is no great economic development. Economic development attracts immigrants. In a city like Bradford, much of the immigration took place decades ago, and now it's their descendents that live there. Yet its former industry is nothing like what it used to be. Many cities are post-industrial wastelands, artificially propped-up by the Bank of England which recently made the desperate measure of printing more money. The UK produces nothing of great value. I realised this when I was 13 years old. People who work in offices and shops do not really PRODUCE anything. Thus between the local population and the immigrants and their descendents there is hostility, particularly because jobs are so scarce.

Anonymous said...

Multiculturalism is a form of ethnic cleansing. It is the process of sending ethnic groups (i.e. white Europeans and their descendents across the world, and possibly other groups as well) into a long, slow procces of decline that will, centuries into the future, result in their total non-existence, their biological extirpation.

Paradoxically, if you go to a town which is 99% white and you happen to be non-white, you may be welcomed because the people are all sick of each other and they appreciate the interest of a foreigner.

Economically, at the moment, the East is rising. In Western universities they pump out Marxist neo-hippies who have nothing to offer economically, but in Asia they ignore that shit and look for practical careers and choose the sciences. Yet I have even heard that China is suffering to some extent as a result of the current global economic situation.

One interesting question is this: is life better in Shanghai or Bradford? Obviously both beat life in Mogadishu. A shitty, run down disgusting council house is heaven to a Somalian.

Anonymous said...

I'd like all those leftists, Marxists, anarchists and so on in Western countries to take a holiday in Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia. That will teach them that their views are wrong - not returning with their lives.

Anonymous said...

At the same time, internecine conflicts still exist in this country, such as sectarianism in Northern Ireland and its extension into Glasgow and the Old Firm. If anything, that shows how parochial they are. Yet, parochialism seems to a key to resisting internationalism.

Anonymous said...

That is to say, we may live in towns and cities which provide us with food, unlike some unfortunate parts of the world, but the benefits state condemns people to a totally miserable existence.

http://www.zoopla.co.uk/home-values/aberdeen/manor-avenue/

I am lucky to be slightly above that, but that does not mean anything like a positive lifestyle. If anything, the norm is hardship.

Anonymous said...

Eliza Sophie Caird, who is the grandaughter of an intensely religious Protestant figure from Dundee, did a hit single "I Don't Care What the People May Say" with an African male singer from London with the music video filmed in Jamaica. I can't help but feel that such couplings even just in a musical sense are deliberately interracial, as with interracial porn, by those who produce these entertainment products.

Here, there are beggars on the street. Gypsies from Romania begging for money on the street. They come here in search of work and find themselves homeless. Turkish kebab shops all serve halal meat. That's how it is.

I often find myself when walking in the street and an African immigrant male is walking towards me, he will not get out of the way and I will not get out of the way either, and so his arm will brush against mine. They seem to think that others should get out of the way for them; they have an innate arrogance. I deliberately try to walk right into them to make them get out of my way.

There is plenty of scum amongst the indigenous population as well, to be sure.

Anonymous said...

Why does life have to be like this?

Why can't a massive asteroid just come and fucking wipe out all humans in an instant?

Anonymous said...

Never mind the asteroids...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8814192/Fitch-downgrades-Italian-and-Spanish-debt-ratings.html

Economically, we are fucked. Italy and Spain are fucked due to outsourcing to the East, but realistically so are we in Britain. The only good decision New Labour made was not joining the Euro. Aside from that, New Labour were the worst traitorous scumbags ever? "Things can only get better?" No, not at all, but perhaps Tony Blair's head inside a guillotine being chopped off would be a fitting punishment for that traitor cunt who has destroyed the UK.

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korea#Demographics

South Korea is one of the most ethnically homogeneous societies in the world, with more than 99% of inhabitants having Korean ethnicity.[122] Koreans call their society 단일민족국가, Dan-il minjok guk ga, "the single race society".

South Korea's birthrate is the world's lowest.[128] If this continues, its population is expected to decrease by 13% to 42.3 million in 2050,[129]

I like the idea of a single race society a lot (and all societies on planet Earth should endeavour to acheive this).

The fact that its birth rate is below replacement rate means that feminism needs to be tackled, and aggressively destroyed if necessary.

Anonymous said...

The world economy is fucked, yet camp, Marxist university-educated males who talk with tones of voice like women say that this is not a problem because certain groups in Africa don't have food.

It doesn't matter if indigenous British people don't have jobs - just think of all of those that don't have food!

You would have to be homosexual to even attempt to say such a thing. I hope all the middle class Marxist SCUM in all Western countries die a horrible brutal death. Some of the academics that exemplify their type include:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Ingold

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hylland_Eriksen

Anonymous said...

Political correctness stifles genuine intellectual thought. One great thing about Stoddard's book Rising Tide is that it was written before political correctness as a concept existed.

The truth is, most people don't give a fuck. Most people are happy to shout at each other like SCUM with no ideology or identity and just watch the football and so on...

Anonymous said...

Mental TORTURE is seeing attractive girls in short dresses and high heels whilst African immigrant males walk the streets. IT IS FUCKING TORTURE! I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF IT!

Do you understand me, Rufus?

Anonymous said...

To have our women parade around in skimpy clothing in front of immigrant men from all across the globe is insulting and degrading. It is insulting to our masculinity.

Fuck the European Convention on Human Rights, get that fucking guillotine back into fucking action.

FUCK LIBERALISM

FUCK MULTICULTURALISM

FUCK WHITE WOMEN PUSHING MIXED RACE CHILDREN IN THE STREET

Anonymous said...

Nations are not economic blocs.

Nations define within their borders a distinct peoples and cultures.

A nations landscape also contributes to the makeup of a peoples.

The key to the future wellbeing of our peoples, White peoples, is to rid the capitalist mindset from amongst them.

Final Conflict said...

A very interesting post. The examples of Caithness and Kernow (Norse and Celtic - Earldom and Nation) are superb examples.

The 1974 counties did give the traditional Kingdoms/Principalities back to Wales (Dyfed, Glamorgan etc.) whereas today's Cardiff, Newport, Bridgend and Swansea county councils are pretty meaningless - and many of the others (Pembrokeshire, Carmarthenshire etc.) are Norse/English shires imposed by the sword many centuries ago.

Rufus said...

The comment above about 90%+ of porn whores being European thoroughbreds may be due to0 more than looks. This issue needs looking into, and I hope to write on this shortly. I agree 100% that the talmudic porn industry is destroying European civilisation - and not only the 18/R-rated material, the filth pushed in TV soaps too. The culprits are Khazar false Jews (see: http://jewishfaces.com/porn.html ). I will return to this later.

re. the Central Banks: at the risk of sounding anti-Semitic, they are all privately owned by a small group of families, who all share the same Ashkenazi ancestry. All races and cultures suffer at the hands of the usurers, and yes, Britain could starve. The country came close to it in the Second World War, but the population is now much higher. An economic blockade, oil shortage, or natural disaster couyld halt food imports - then we would be in serious trouble.

Multi-culturalism harms everyone. A positive realistic approach to ethnicity and culture is required to reverse the immigration policies of the Talmudic Establishment. The key to saving our nation is to stop destroying other peoples countries and making emmigation their only option. People generally prefer their own kind, which is why they build replicas of their homelands in the new communities. Economic exploitation and Zionist racism are the cause of all our ills.

Rufus said...

FC: Thank you. The abolition of the absurd counties of Flint and Denbighshire to form Clwyd, was a positive move. The return to the foreign imposed names also included boundary changes which muddy the divisions of the pre-1974 areas. The London regime have no understanding of local culture and treat our localities as would an occupier drawing on a map. Of course they are occupiers, hailing from territories far to the east of not only Wales, but Europe.

Anonymous said...

It is indeed true that Caithness, although in Scotland, is influenced by the Vikings as a simple fact of history, as are the Orkney and Shetland Islands.

Lerwick? Wick? Andrew BerWICK? Anders Behring Breivik?

'Wick' or 'Vik' seems to simply mean 'harbour' or 'cove'. 'Breivik' means 'broad cove'.

I can tell you one thing from my experience: Caithness is not influenced by multiculturalism. There are a tiny number of Asian takeaway owners and that's it.

Anonymous said...

And I have only just noticed today that Breivik does in fact know about http://www.heretical.com because it is mentioned in his manifesto. No joke. I didn't even notice that until today.

I wonder whether he read the site and possibly that influenced his anti-feminism?

Anonymous said...

In some British prisons, there are PlayStations, libraries, gyms, religious chaplaincies and all manner of things. There are even reports that girlfriends were allowed to spend the night with prisoners so that they could have sex.

(Not at HMP Peterhead though, where the serial killer scumbag, Peter Tobin, is residing...)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMP_Peterhead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tobin

(Still a far lower kill count than Anders Behring Breivik, but then again the serial killer Harold Shipman has a higher kill count than Breivik, although his victims were old and they were going to die anyway, whereas Breivik mostly killed young people - and those of his own ethnic background at that, with only a small proportion of immigrants. Looking at the photos of the victims I remember noticing that he killed a black girl as well as a few other non-Europeans.)

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/07/anders-breivik-as-a-nordicist/

Interesting article that...

But the main point I was trying to make here was what I read about Norway's prisons. You couldn't push the message that "crime pays" harder than this if you tried:

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/07/25/the_super_lux_super_max

Look through all the photos. It is like a fucking student campus well suited for the 2010s decade with all the latest gadgets, sports facilities, totally modern library, en-suite luxury rooms with digital TV, complete with pretty Norwegian babes (who it seems are A+++ in terms of hotness, seriously they may have the most beautiful women in the world) as prison guards. And they call that punishment?

Breivik may be getting sent there. It really shows that the left is utterly, utterly mad.

Anonymous said...

One other thing that I was wanting to say that the mass murderers of NATO in their illegal wars are guilty of the same crimes as Anders Behring Breivik.

If a bomb goes off in Somalia or Afghanistan the human casualties will not be viewed on the same level by the mass media as it would if it took place in the "First World" countries.

Anonymous said...

There is much to made of internet activism.

There is that whole 4chan/Anonymous/Lulz bloc; who seem fixated on a mixture of stupid 'funny' pictures, pornography and hacking.

On the other hand, there are those who seek genuine censorship. Governments are really keen on this.

If anything, that whole group I mentioned above is defined by immaturity. This can be exploited by governments, and can serve to justify employing restrictions in society that are unneccessary whilst at the same time promoting ridiculous social norms.

Anonymous said...

The social revolution in the West in the 1960s is one thing that I despise. I am now listening to no music and watching no films and television because I understand that these things are key agents of social manipulation.

The entire mass media, the cult of celebrity and mainstream politics go hand in hand with that.

Essentially it is about the destruction of diversity. Yes, the mainstream-leftist status quo seeks to destroy diversity - that is what internationalism is.

Anonymous said...

Indeed, it could be said that listening to music and watching films and TV are evidence of a feminized, emasculated man. That is what I believe. Stop listening to music. Music is for women and homosexuals and quasi-homosexuals. Ditto with film and television.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8824568/One-in-six-mobile-phones-contains-e.-coli.html

Ah, the old bacterium, Staphylococcus aureus. Look at it:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/MRSA7820.jpg

It looks like a bunch of grapes, but it is capable of causing serious harm. Amy Winehouse had impetigo a couple of years before she died (caused by this bacterium).

Anonymous said...

http://www.henrymakow.com/how_uk_destroyed_new_male_gene.html

Another classic example of an article that was written by Henry Makow himself posing as a 'contributor'.

Makow is a fraud, ditto David Icke and all the rest of them. You should stop linking to these types and believing their shit. They are appealing to the mainstream for a reason. One interesting leftist concept is that of 'essentialism'. Perhaps that could be reworked and extrapolated for our own ends.

Anonymous said...

We have our masses of cities and towns with their social problems of which unemployment is the big issue.

We are living in the ex-industrial world. All the industry has gone to China and related places. Our societies are just vestigial.

Rufus said...

Breivik is a sick individual. I was in Oslo a decade ago and accidentally strayed into the Islamic area of the city. Thankfully a group of Swedes (of all people) were passing through and took me under their wing. Things were bad ten years ago. I fear to imagine the tension now. Breivik's bombing and shooting of Europeans makes no sense. Bombing any civilians is a bad idea, but bombing your own is insane.

The link to the super-luxurious prison hotels is an eye-opener. There was a case a while ago of an immigrant commiting rape then waiting to be caught so he could enjoy a life in prison which far surpassed anything on the outside. It is said that a nation can be judged by how it treats its convicts. Indeed it can - and much of Europe is clearly barking mad.

On the subject of the victims of NATO being treated as less than human, dehumanising one's enemies is vital lest the people at home see the evil acts of the State for what they are and demand they be stopped. I worry about the UK. The blatant lies of the media go un-noticed, or worse still, noticed but unopposed. The silence of the majority is tantamount to acceptance of our plight. Worrying indeed.

Rufus said...

The social revolution of the 1960s was the beginning of the end for Europe. It may be that the harm is now so deep that full recovery will be impossible - except in small communities. That said, we have to try.

Essentialism is an interesting concept. Perhaps you could email me some information on this - or an article I could reproduce here? All sources have to be viewed with caution - but surely that is vital for any decent research. A problem with the followers of Icke etc is that they watch the videos, pay large sums to be entertained at the live gigs, then slap one another on the back and DO nothing. I experienced the self-congratulatory attitude when I gave speeches to political parties. People applauded then went home and carried on their lives completely unchanged. Uninformed individuals have an excuse for their complicity with the demise of society. Those who cannot claim ignorance are as bad as the Establishment they oppose in word, but uphold in deed.

Anonymous said...

How tall are you Rufus? I am 6'3" and fairly muscular and so Africans or Muslims or whatever will not scare me. I understand that for people not of my stature they may appear threatening. Once I had to tell a black man to fuck off whilst harassing some of my female relatives when he was offering them to come to his flat to take drugs. That being said it is different if a group of them gang up on you as an individual.

Essentially, the left is critical of essentialism.

The left is absolutely horrible in everything it believes in. If Karl Marx had never been born, would we have the left as it currently exists?

They claim to be against discrimination and inequality yet are guilty of massive hypocrisy because their policies result in discrimination against white males. And yet, many of the most rabid leftists are themselves white males. A clear instance of DRoFC.

Anonymous said...

I understand that in your city, Bradford, Pakistanis dominate.

But I bet they're cowards as individuals. They probably roam around in gangs, am I right?

Anonymous said...

Henry Makow is a menace:

http://www.henrymakow.com/trip_to_phils_restores_faith_i.html

Today I happened to see some mixed-race relationships, 3 of them. All of them as it turned out were between white males and Oriental females, just by chance.

Rufus said...

On the issue of my physique, I am tall and well built. Not a 6'3" giant, but still tall. I understand your reason for asking. In my area there are indeed marauding gangs of scum - some Pakistani, some homegrown Chav -and indeed they do act as pack animals, attacking the small and weak-looking. When on their own, they won't make eye contact, but when in gangs they have fake courage - courage which dissapears as soon as you stand your ground. It is a shame that we have to experience such idiotic behaviour. A restored nation with values and respect would not breed such scum. The gangs who roam are a symptom of the downfall of society. The alien gangs are an embarrassment to their communitees; hopefully they will disappera from the planet once the non-indigenous communitees return to their homelands. I agree with Marx on the issue of the lumpenproletariat; they are useless and a waste of resources, fit only for vivisection. OK, Marx didn't argue for the last point, but had science reached that point in his time, I'm sure he would.

I hadn't heard the term 'essentialism' until you used it yourself. The politically correct ideology that women are not born, but made so by society is an example of the lunacy of acadæmia and socialist engineering. Of course a woman is a woman! Our essence is immutable and the Cultural Marxists hate that. Thank you for introducing me to the concept, which I concur with but was unaware had a label.

The Makow post is interesting. Reading his comment at the end, he warns against trusting women who advertise themselves online to get the wealthiest spouse. I can see where your objection comes from, but in his reply, Makow advises the author of the article to look for a local woman and NOT go to Asia wife-shopping. The posting of the article in itself raises questions, I will agree, but at least the subject is raised and not brushed under the carpet.

Anonymous said...

How tall are you exactly Rufus? At 6'3" I feel tall, taller than most people, but I still don't feel like a giant, even though a guy came up to me in a pub recently and said he wanted me as a security guard for his company. If I was 6'6" I would feel like a giant. As far as my personal life goes, I am very used to towering over small girls that have been attracted to me. Very few of the women that have been attracted to me have been tall, which is a pity. It has mostly been small girls that I have towered over.

And of course there are the Chavs (in England of course). Uneducated white (European) underclasses exist everywhere - in the USA, Portugal, England, Scotland, Ireland, Romania, Poland, Russia, Italy - essentially they have a lot in common.

If there's one group in the world I admire the most in terms of their determination for their survival, it's the religious Orthodox Jews. They want a future for their people, so they have lots of kids and encourage their kind to do the same.

Anonymous said...

I also can't understand why white males if they were desperate to seek wives elsewhere would choose the Far East. Their women have no curves.

Or it's maybe just my taste in women, I don't know.

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavian_Scotland

I am highly interested in this topic - the history that the Norse had on Scotland.

Clearly Orkney and Shetland were dominated by them, and the same way true of many of the Western islands.

On the mainland, Caithness was the area that they dominated. In the place names in that area the Viking influence can clearly be seen.

Too bad today's Norsemen are a bunch of fucking pussy Marxist hippies... (yes exceptions may exist but they are exceptions)

Anonymous said...

http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/open-britain

They want Britain to be 'open' just like they want a white woman's cunt to be 'open' to a 'big black cock' in a porn film. In other words, the Super Feminine State.

The left cannot be reasoned with and indeed will censor or dismiss any anti-leftist thought, and the left is the mainstream in academia and amongst educated people. As I am sure you will know, they have gradually been pushing the mainstream media and culture further and further to the left in the past several decades. Basically, it's about changing standards and making it more and more liberal with each coming decade.

All Marxist doctrines (whether economical or cultural) should have been strongly opposed by Western nations, but instead the hypocritical scum (who claim to represent 'egalitarianism' when it is the opposite of that) got their way.

Anonymous said...

'Diversity Monitoring Forms' in job applications (which discriminate against white males) are directly traceable to Marx.

So much of the cancer afflicting Western societies in general is traceable to Marx and those who took on his ideas. That's without even getting started on what happened in the USSR, China, Cambodia and so on. The death toll from these combined events was far higher than 6 million.

The entire canon of Western popular culture can be viewed as an extension of Marx's ideas for how society should be from Elvis Presley onwards. Yes, him shaking his hips should have been regarded as the cancer that it was. It should have been supressed and strongly punished, and any imitators should have been tracked down and given the same harsh treatment. My ideal society (which will never exist - I am not stupid and I can critique those who will critique me) is a society of standards.

An interesting thing is that you get people on the left and on the right in every European country at least. I agree that being from a particular country cannot be used as an essentialist tool to describe all the natives of that country. Essentialism is criticised by the left, yet essentialism is akin to Sheppard's DSoD theory.

Anonymous said...

The whole thing about Asperger Syndrome is just another leftist cause inspired by the idea of Marxist opression of 'minorities'.

I am not a great fan of Luke O'Farrell, but he has said a few good things, namely this:

http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/vulture.html

Religion seems to be rather like a boomerang: the harder you throw it away, the harder it flies back and hits you. Liberals and secularists throughout the West have thrown Christianity away, and it’s flown back and hit them in the form of anti-racism, feminism and – the latest of their cults – “Global Warming”.

Anonymous said...

The left has a fetish for necrophilia. Read this article:

http://thisjapaneselife.org/2011/07/06/on-the-death-of-japan/

Here's some graves in the Scottish village of Helmsdale:

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4324/helmsdale1.png

http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/3465/helmsdale2.png

Personally I like walking through graveyards and reading the signs on them. Particularly, comparing the age difference between husbands and wives is an interesting thing to do.

Also, hundreds of years into the future we will all be dead when non-whites will have completely extirpated us just like the Amerindians were exterminated from the Caribbean islands.

I enjoy spending time in graveyards... it means that you are close to dead bodies.

Anonymous said...

Is it possible to have sex with a human skeleton? I would say not. In reproductive/genetic terms their value is null.

Yet the left seeks to deny the value of reproductive/genetic facilities and hence focus on 'the indvidual'. Hence, the left supports necrophilia.

Also, miscegenation (race-mixing) is the sublimation of necrophilic urges.

Anonymous said...

The truth about Japan and South Korea is that unlike Breivik's conception of them, they have a very low birth rate which means a large elderly population and a small young population.

I do not agree that immigration is the solution to such problems; rather a more traditional society in which family and children are considered important is the real solution. But, they want to increase the cost of raising a child to ridiculous levels as a weapon of bloodless genocide. The Establishment scum will stop at nothing in order to destroy us.

Anonymous said...

http://www.theoligarch.com/anders_behring_breivik.htm

Breivik even quotes Nietzsche's prediction that Christianity would die in the 20th Century as a result of Darwinism, but the underlying "slave mentality" of feminine humanitarian rather than masculine evolutionary philosophy would be retained, eventually precipitating social and economic collapse. This is the idea that God has been killed dead in a slave revolt, and this mindless act of patricide will eventually have devastating consequences on society.

See, the left is feminine, right is masculine. The individual is feminine, the general is masculine. The social is feminine, the biological is masculine. Compassion is feminine, genetic interests are masculine. Essentialism is masculine too and can be viewed as an extension of the DSoD theory, which is why leftists (who are feminized inherently). Also note DRoFC and the expression of female characteristics with masculine force - in this sense, leftists and crossdressers/homosexuals are alike.

Because the Western psychological disease is individualism, the cure is collectivism, and the two conventional political philosophies which embody that are socialism (scientific idealism) and cultural conservatism (moral idealism). With the failure of socialism, it is natural that populists in Europe and the US head toward nationalistic social-conservatism. From the big picture long term viewpoint, what we are really talking about is a move from the subjective to objective, from individualism to collectivism, from nihilism to utopian idealism. The French Revolution, The Russian Revolution, and 1930s Fascism all toyed with this massive transition, but it looks as if the big moment is finally close at hand. Drink does not take over a man's life at a constant pace, it begins slowly, and accelerates. In the same way individualism has accelerated, we have been twitching for hundreds of years, now full blown neurosis is finally breaking out.

The old masculine communism did not work, due to too many atrocities being associated with it. Instead academic Marxists sought the 'soft left' approach and infiltrated society's institutions, seeking gradual change over time to change society's standards. One-world Marxists are really the scum of the earth.

Anonymous said...

Although, thinking about the topic of porn, it is quite obvious that porn (and its easy availability on the Internet) goes hand in hand with all the other left-wing social changes that have taken place within the West since 1945.

Porn exploits men's natural high sex drive and polygamous desires for as many women as possible. Makow once wrote that all porn is gay but I don't think it is, I think all porn is designed to appeal to the male brain because the male brain according to evolutionary psychologists is designed to check out women. There are types of porn that are especially harsh on the eyes, and I'm sure you can guess what I'm talking about.

What porn does essentially is redirects men's natural strong desire for women and channels it into something that is genetically/racially of null value. This leads to the breakup of relationships and families, divorces, and a rise in the number of single people. Women get jealous and upset when they find their men being aroused by porn instead of them. To a Marxist, the family is just a miniature version of the oppressive state. Therefore porn = Marxism.

I also got some of my ideas about race, race-mixing and intensification of male breeding competition from porn.

Anonymous said...

Porn has of course been criticised by radical feminists, who themselves owe their ideological/intellectual existence to the legacy of Marx and his ideas about class struggle and oppression, which were later translated by Adorno et al into being about gender, race, sexual orientation and so on instead of class. Many of those on the academic left do not care about those of lower social class within their own countries, preferring to take interest in sporadic 'causes' in various parts of the world. In game theory there is Tit for Tat and Generous Tit for Tat. Giving donations to far-off peoples without any expectation of anything in return (which is silly from a biological/genetic/racial/sexual/evolutionary/masculine perspective) is GTFT and is influenced by Marxist desires for egalitarianism and the elimination of biological difference. Denial of the fact that biological differences exist between different groups of humans (race, gender) is common amongst leftists.

That being said there is another type of feminist that is much more common today than the radical feminist: the sex-positive feminist, and many of these take a pro-porn view. Whilst it is expected that with sex, the male is always eager to say yes, with the female it is more complicated: there is a neurotic conflict about whether to say yes or no.

The sexual selection of males by females is the 'regulating factor' in human evolution. It is worth noting that contraception and abortion in today's world prevents a large number of births, and that has surely an effect on evolution too.

A male stands a greater chance if he is seen to be 'special' by the females (IoR). This is why in various places where people of different races have come into contact, the females have been attracted to the male invaders. This may be equally true for all human races.

It is also worth noting that females' level of idealism and high mindedness tend to be far lower than in men. In so far as they are politically minded at all, most young women tend towards the left. Conservative women are usually older. Why would a white heterosexual male wish to choose to be a leftist? That is something that I cannot understand. That being said, there are plenty of things that I can't relate to.

Anonymous said...

One of my female cousins dated a Filipino guy, but in general relationships between white males and Oriental women remain a lot more common than vice-versa. The Japanese and Korean women are probably the most attractive as far as that part of the world is concerned. Even then, some Japanese women still want to look like white women with skin whitening and dying their hair in non-black colours. Also, black American males in military bases in Japan are often successful with Japanese women according to what I am told.

The truth is that economics is key in determining so much within society, but economics does not determine biology. Much has been said about the current state of the global economy. The oil and natural gas industry is one major area where the money is. Anywhere that has oil fields will prosper as a result. Of course, oil is a finite resource and humanity will have to find an alternative. If it does not there will be mass starvations. Don't take it for granted that there will be food on supermarket shelves and benefits always available to those who are out of work to pay for that food. The welfare state is exploited by immigrants, like Romanian gypsies for example who milk the system for their own ends in order to receive luxuries at taxpayers' expense. If leftists could get over their pathetic self-hating religion, there might be some real change for the good, but I won't hold my breath.

Yes, the world population is approaching 7 billion. Yes, there are kids starving in Somalia. What needs to be done to prevent this is to find a way of reducing the population rise in the Third World. This will benefit both us and them.

Anonymous said...

For example, the concept of 'racism' needs to be eliminated and destroyed.

I am a decent man and accept all humans for their humanity, but that word, along with 'sexism' and many others, needs to be destroyed.

It is a simple fact that the basic human male instinct is to look after and protect one's genes. The female instinct is to submit to the group that appears dominant.

It is pure dogma that 'racism' is a bad thing. I am happy to rest upon the dogma that genetic/racial/sexual interests are what is most important, because it's the most sound strategy: discrimination against death. If you think discrimination against death is bad, then you are mad like Mitchell Heisman (who actually had some interesting views and ideas but was ultimately insane).

All humans should be treated with dignity and personhood, I agree. But that should not come at the expense of genetic/sexual/racial interests.

Anonymous said...

Leftist egalitarianism does not extend to the sexual sphere. With its individualism, getting sex is outwith the aims of socialism (which would of course be hampered by feminism anyway).

Getting sex happens when you least expect it; when some girl comes up to you in a bar and she fancies you in the extreme. I've been there done that, far too many times. It is not wholesome.

The term 'brainwashing' is another one that is problematic. Again, it all depends on your epistemological point of reference. To a leftist, 'far-right' material is propaganda, yet to many on the right, the mainstream media contains many aspects of propaganda. Linda McCartney vegetarian meals (before you mention it, she may have had a Jewish background, blah blah blah - I know about all that stuff but I don't like the tactic of tracing everything to that) have on the back of their food packets something about creating a better world that is better for animals, the enivronment and you. Clearly aspects of the leftist 'religion' here are being played out to unsuspecting food consumers, mainly women. There are more women vegetarians than men, and I am not vegetarian but sometimes eat vegetarian meals, because I am disgusted by eating parts of the corpse of a cow or a fish. It literally makes me want to spit the food out of my mouth thinking about how it had been a living animal and that I have parts of its body in my mouth. Yet, I love things like cockles and mussels because I see them as animals of such a low level that they are not worth caring about. Did I ever talk to you about Peter Singer and speciesism? Morrissey, the famous ex-Smiths singer, is very pro-animal rights and has been accused of 'racist' statements but I'm not sure whether his animal rights would extend to cockles. Go to your nearest supermarket and buy yourself a jar of them and tell me whether you think they taste nice because I certainly think they do.

Gaddafi vowed to die a martyr, and he did. Things were actually good in Libya prior to his upheaval. It was actually the best country in Africa on many grounds as far as the welfare of the people was concerned. Of course, oil wealth as I have discussed created this position, but just 1 year ago, Libya was a stable, oil-rich country which provided welfare for its people and that has been just obliterated.

Anonymous said...

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100113125/pc-lingo-cant-disguise-the-racist-malthusian-subtext-of-the-7-billionth-baby-panic/

As some commentators have explained there, 'racism' is simply genetic/racial/sexual interest, a normal masculine desire.

It is a perfect example of why the concept of 'racism' needs to be eliminated, without eliminating the humanity of any human.

One commentator writes:

"In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe will provide such an opportunity."

Anonymous said...

It's exactly as predicted by Lothrop Stoddard. He was writing at a time before political correctness existed and thus has the right to be offensive in his writings just like many 19th century writers, and yet he has accurately predicted what is going on right now.

There is the fear of the Black Peril: the invincible prepotency of Africa. We are told that all humans originate there (which is questionable based upon scientific evidence, and is advanced by leftists in order to promote a political agenda) and we are well aware that black men have far higher rates of relationships with non-black women than vice-versa. This falls outwith the leftist conception of egalitarianism because egalitarianism does not extend into the sexual sphere, unless it's for homosexuals.

Sex is everything: by evolution it has made us what we are and it will also make us what we will become.

Anonymous said...

It is interesting, though, that racial nationalist comments are being left at the Telegraph, a mainstream UK newspaper.

Someone like Vron Ware simply exemplifies the feminine mindset. She is a woman, and she is only acting on her instincts.

Racial nationalism is only a representation of the masculine brain. That is what is being critiqued by leftists (some of whom are white males themselves, but bear in mind DRoFC).

One writer in that Telegraph article also states: "This is rubbish. White or black makes no difference. England is over populated and Scotland is not."

Whilst incorporating feminine aspects of the DSoD theory ("white or black makes no difference") he correctly points out that Scotland is really quite empty in comparison to England, in terms of its population density regarding its land area. I see that as a good thing. A lower population would be better for the world generally, and it needs to start in the poorest countries. 'Racism' is just genetic interest, which is a natural masculine instinct. This should not involve denying the humanity of any people of any racial/ethnic background.

Anonymous said...

One commentor in the Telegraph said:

1950 ; White population 24. 5%
1950 ; Black population 8.5%

2060; White population 8.0%
2060 ; Black population 24. 5%

2200; White population 4.0%

2300; White population ?

I think the decline between 2060 and 2200 will be much larger. By 2200 it'll probably be something like 0.2% and mostly old people.

Anonymous said...

And in light on that fact, I feel I have complete sexual inadequacy. Virility is proven by the births, the sexual conquests. Even if I am sexually successful it doesn't matter BECAUSE WE ALL LOSE IN THE END. And you know who wins? The Black African man, who wins over the rest of humanity due to higher birth rates than the rest of us, for a start.

That is what has to be taken into account. Now people of a local region may speak with specific local words/phrases - I understand these very well because people use them whereas outsiders would struggle - but these are on the terminal decline due to globalism.

Anonymous said...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/8849893/One-third-of-humanity-faces-biggest-risks-from-climate-change.html

That news story image is an obvious a photoshop as any.

Globalization - by that I mean the mass contact between people of different races and cultures from around the world - has been a disaster. Throughout history there has been such contact, but never on today's scale. Not when there are airports connecting all parts of the world. Travel is inherently anti-nationalistic. Today's technology and capitalism makes it inevitable, and it's impossible to fight it. Anyone who thinks they can change it is living in a fantasy world. However, to be anti-nationalistic is to choose death over life. That is the paradox. It is complete nihilism.

With this in mind, is life really worth living at all? Nationalism is a fantasy that has no place at all in the 21st century whatsoever. Any intelligent person should know this. The people who vote for the BNP and National Front and EDL/SDL/WDL supporters as well as both Northern Irish loyalists AND Republicans likely have shit for brains. Globalization and modernity are irreversible phenomena.

But they also mean genetic/racial/sexual death. Globalization and modernity could make me lose my erection even if I was having sex with the hottest woman in the world.

I have been watching the BBC comedy, Rab C. Nesbitt, which is set in Govan, Glasgow, for the past couple of weeks. There is no doubt that it is funny, but they portray the Muslim woman at the dole centre as the epitome of refined, talking in Estuary English. There's also no way in hell that the BBC would portray non-whites as uncultured slobs like Rab C. Nesbitt. Yes you do get types like him but he is an exaggerated caricature of the worst excesses of poor native weegies.

Anonymous said...

What has been said about Libya is true: under Gadaffi prior to this year he actually treated his citizens well. There is ample evidence for this, and I knew about it long before I'd read this article:

http://www.disinfo.com/2011/10/16-things-libya-will-never-see-again/

But as I've already stated, it's the oil wealth that enables such policies to be created. If there was no oil in the Middle East, it would be a barren desert landscape full of poor Arabs.

Several countries in Africa, including Nigeria, Angola and Gabon have also prospered from the oil wealth. Yes, Libya is in Africa too but it's not exactly black Africa.

There are many other places with oil - Venezuela, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and probably others that I'm not aware of - all of these places will benefit. Anywhere that has oil will see massive economic improvements. They are now starting to drill in the Arctic Ocean as the icecap is shrinking, starting in northern Greenland.

Was Gaddafi really a tyrant? He provided Libyans with the highest HDI in Africa, for a start. My suspicion is that it is more about the fact that internationalists don't like nationalism, of any kind.

Anonymous said...

Was Gaddafi responsible for the Lockerbie bombing? I don't know and I don't pretend to claim that I know. Indeed I will claim that I do not know anything at all about anything for certain, including the idea that I exist. Words are merely descriptors. As small children learn language, this must somehow form their epistemology. There are cases of children who have been raised by animals, 'feral children'.

I am interested in psychology and one major development within humanity could be a system of genuine telepathy, where somehow human brains could be linked to the point where one human could read the mind of another human. To the best of my knowledge there is no evidence that this is possible, but given the advances in technology there is always room for development. With Siamese twins for example they share the same body but separate minds. This obviously raises questions of how they have control over their limbs, but mainstream science can document this as a result of existing Siamese twins (Google: Abigail and Britanny Hensel).

I don't believe in such ideas as 'posthumanism' and 'post-biological evolution' see them as impossible nonsense. Mitchell Heisman (and yes, he was a secular ethnic Jew, but that doesn't mean anything at all and does not make him part of some big conspiracy) talked about the desire for post-biological evolution, but in my opinion that is not possible. He said 'God is Technology' on the foundation of St. Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God that 'God is that which of nothing greater can be imagined', and Heisman says that technology is that which of nothing greater can be conceived. However, St. Anselm's argument is criticized and derided as lunacy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument

What do Mitchell Heisman, Anders Behring Breivik and Simon Sheppard all have in common? They are/were all nutcases, fixated upon a worldview that in each case was unique but all with some similarities. Indeed it could be argued that all individuals have a unqiue worldview, whether political or not. Who even knows what words mean? It's not quantifiable on a parallel with mathematic knowledge for example.

Anonymous said...

Totally rejecting the idea of human psychological genetic egalitarianism, words are not adequate to describe the same things to different people. Pavlov described classical conditioning and my view is that words are associated with experiences. The human brain learns by association. My major areas of interest are psychology, biology, philosophy, geography, economics, history and political theory. I am interested in these topics yet I hate today's university as it stands. It is true that the left pervades within academia, as we all know.

The philosophy of language is an interesting topic. In short, I don't want to be ridiculed for ignorance and would actively welcome discussion with those who are interested in ideas. I am also non-dogmatic (unlike those who accept Marx as the one true saviour) and would welcome being proven wrong, but sadly I do not believe this is possible.

Anonymous said...

And the fact that philosophers have repeatedly failed to find and agree on epistemological truth just points to the idea of religion as an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Political correctness has indeed stifled genuine academic thought or philosophy, by ostracizing those who step outside the line. Politically incorrect opinions will not even be debated in mainstream academia; they will just be hysterically or violently (as in UAF) suppressed. That is to say, they are not willing to debate ideas that may be at odds with their philosophy.

The left is not even willing to engage in rational debate. Philosophically and psychologically they are closed to ideas that may be deemed offensive.

This fact was a key cause of the actions of Breivik.

Political correctness has also genuinely harmed true scientific research. There is plenty of evidence that different races of human, and the sexes, are not of equal abilities, as a result of biology.

We once had an open, undogmatic Western academia that sought to explore everything and left no question unchallenged. Now? Pfft.

Anonymous said...

I am eating a part of a dead fish's body right now. It tastes nice, but that doesn't change the fact that it's part of a dead animal's body. Now believe me I have enjoyed a lot of fish over the years, it tastes so damn fine, even if there are small bones in it. But that shouldn't change the discussion.

An animal, a fish that had grown from a fry with a yolk sac attached to it. I have also eaten squid, chicken and prawn today. A great diversity of living animals I have consumed in one day.

Why don't animal rights' activists protest against supermarkets? After all, they are the ones stocking the meat and animal products (such as leather) and products tested on animals that they claim to oppose.

Animal rights activists only form one specific branch of the political far-left, truth be told, and largely disconnected with the rest of it.

Anonymous said...

The fact that DRoFC (Double Reinforcement of Female Characteristics) is real can be seen with cross-dressers, drag queens and camp gay men. They will emulate female characteristics, but take it too far as to do it with masculine excessive force to the point where they appear ridiculous and make a mockery of both masculinity and femininity. That is to say, they will take the mannerisms of women and exemplify them to the extreme.

It also explains white males on the political far-left.

Some males have a sexual fetish for dressing up in women's clothing. Apparently this relates to autogyneaphilia, 'love of oneself as a woman'.

Yet it is all totally psychological in those men. I don't see how they are able to fetishize the idea of themselves as women whilst they are not biologically women.

To someone inspired by Social Darwinism, homosexuality, cross-dressing, transsexualism, paedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, incest et al are NOTHING compared to miscegenation because none of the former have any particularly important reproductive/genetical/sexual effect whereas the latter very obviously does and results in genetic changes to populations unparalleled throughout tens of thousands of years of human history.

Anonymous said...

The doctrine of deep ecology was created by the Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss. I remember being told about it by one of my university professors back years ago.

Essentially it places humans below the rest of nature. That leftist self-hatred, which is taught to unsupsecting young people - all of it can be ideologically traced to Marx. That leftist 'religion' which is mainstream in Western universities and most newspapers that are not tabloids...

Basically, anything that is ideologically traceable to Marx is poison, no matter how many different vectors it has come through.

Rufus said...

I have no problem with Jews or anyone else for that matter, living how they please. The problem comes when they try to rule others. The Birobidjan option would allow Jews to live in their self-Chosen fantasy world, without oppressing anyone. Let them go in peace - and stay gone.

As for oriental women having no curves, that is a generalisation. I am attracted to the Celtic look. Oriental women tend to be slim and short - maybe that is the appeal?

Necrophilia is a taboo, and the Marxist liberals attack taboos on principal. Their minds are damaged by the acceptance of what any healthy human being would see to be wrong. They approve of sodomy and coprophilia. Necrophilia is but one stage further in diseased sex.

Immigration is a tool to reduce all humanity to uniform consumer-producers. The reduced birth rate is not a problem. A revitalised economic and social system would protect the elderly and vulnerable. Britain needs to lose about 2/3 of the population to become self sufficient. Immigration is a sham.

Anonymous said...

All aspects of popular culture retard our civilization.

Films, music, television - all of this makes the Western man into a little Peter Pan, who cannot grow up, even at 30.

You are attracted to the Celtic look? Well, I know about the origins of your wife...

Personally I think the Nordic (blonde or brunette, but not with loads of freckles and the rounded Irish face type) look somewhat more attractive than the Celtic (ginger and freckled) as far as my taste in women goes. When I say Nordic I mean that many of these women exist in the UK (even in the shittiest of housing estates, they can be found), but there is a particular direction towards Ireland with that Celtic ginger look and I would have to say that the Nordic look is more attractive. Nothing personal.

Anonymous said...

I mean, to a large extent it's fairly obvious that the inidigeous population of the UK is largely racially Nordic like Scandinavia and many other parts of Northern Europe. This is simply a result of geographical isolation. It's all in the genetics.

You say that being slim and short is the appeal in Oriental women. For me, that's an anti-appeal. My dream woman is tall, blonde, blue eyed and voluptuous. I've had plenty of girls approaching something near this ideal but not the Paragon.

Although I am certainly tall myself, almost all the women I have ever seemed to end up with have been like almost a foot shorter than me. I've been with lots of girls but I seem to tower over all of them.

Anonymous said...

'Racism' can truly be said to be 'pornographic'. To view a person as a result of what they are, rather than who they are - to treat them as a thing, rather than a person - is like pornography. This is similar to the reasons why physical anthropology was considered dehumanizing. I remember reading an essay by Susan Sontag (think it was her, if not, someone very like her) and at the end she called Hitler's philosophy 'pornographic'.

However, as evolutionary psychologists have pointed out, this is simply male instinct. It is certainly interesting that whilst all female instincts are dedicated to raising the cost of sex (and thus are the mediating factor on human evolution), paradoxically pornography is far cheaper to produce than big-budget Hollywood films. How does that work?

Anonymous said...

Furthermore I'd also list our society's obsession with alcohol, partying and 'having fun' as problematic. It is not wholesome or traditional or stable.

Sport, particularly football, is used as a substitute for (male) tribalistic instincts.

Anonymous said...

Primarily, it is governments that are submissive to banks and corporations and not the other way around, although governments can of course produce laws and regulations that affect the practices of these institutions.

Considering that alcohol is a sex subsitute due to the fact that it stimulates the same pleasure centres in the brain as sex, it is interesting that 80% of alcoholics are men compared to 20% that are women.

Physical exercise also builds up testosterone. I once remember reading a post on some website who said that his girlfriend was a runner and had done marathons, and she also wanted sex all the time. Testosterone is present in both males and females and is responsible for creating sexual desire, although it is obviously present in much higher levels in males.

Anonymous said...

The desire to preserve one's kind should NOT be associated with the hatred of those of other ethnicities. There are many decent and very friendly people of various ethncities. Indeed, I do not judge people as humans based on such abritrary criteria.

The point is that preserving one's kind is impossible. Welcome to the age of The Inidividual.

They'll say that mixed race babies are beautiful, yet women and immigrants alike will disregard the fact that because it's almost always white female/immigrant male, that intensifies male breeding competition. And intensification of male breeding competition can result in horrific things.

Rufus said...

Marxism IS a religion. Marx was the son of a Rabbi, and was brought up to believe the Chosen Race nonsense. The Marxist religion speaks of equality, but that ties to the idea that all people are created equal. By denying a creator, Marxism makes no sense. The obsession with money and economic ststus is stereotypically Jewish. A glance at the SWP types is all that is required to see how top heavy with Jews the neo-bolshevist organisations are. Marxism is Talmudism with the deity removed.

On the subject of food, I could happily give up meat. Lamd is chewy, beef tough, and pork fatty. I will be eating a pork roast today, but aside from the delicious crackling, much of the meat is too fatty for my taste. My favourite food is fish. Give me smoked kippers 7 days a week and I would be happy. I'd have to be rich though! Shell fish are definitely tasty, especially prawns and cockles. I would like to try jellied eels but have never seen them on sale. Gefilte fish sound interesting too. I wish I hadn't started writing this, its making me hungry!!

Rufus said...

Qaddafi will go down in history as a hero. Have you seen that the Al Qaeda flag has been hoisted in Libya? (http://uruknet.info/?p=m82678&hd=&size=1&l=e) Cameron, Sarkosy and Berlusconi have created Islamic extremist states to the east and south of Europe. Will thye plant one in the west? Looking around Bradford, I think they already have. Here we have many churches which have closed and reopened as Islamic associations, madrassas etc. We are told that the country is broke, but all the new mosques etc are paid by the tax payer. Amused I am not.

The comment of Scotland not being over-populated reminds me of an article I read which stated that the entire population of the world could fit on the Isle of Wight. The logic there is that we should take everyone who wishes to live in our country. Certainly if we concrete overe every blade of grass, and import all our food, we could live in an inhuman super-city. Personally, I'd rather have fields, animals, beautiful views, and all that makes life worth living. Let those who wish to live in giant slums go live on a dis-used oil rig, which will hopefully sink under their weight, drowning them all and relieving us of having to listen to their moronic babble.

Coloquialisms are disappearing. I used to kniow a lot of people who could shift into broad Yorkshire dialect just for fun, such as whenever a southerner came into a pub. This is no longer the case. We are losing our culture and history. People may scoff at those who use thee and thou, but its preferable to the soul-less coca cola English which is taking over everywhere.

Rab C Nesbitt is a classic. How many people like Cotter do we all know? The series ended then after a few years returned ina new pc format, with no malkies, alcholism, or humour. Nesbitt may have been a bit bolshie at times, but the new version is dire and like cultural marxism in general, dull and uninteresting.

I would disagree that nationalism is defunkt. As resources become ever scarcer, the internationalist order will fail. We will see a rebirth of patriotism and national particularism. The danger is that Talmudists will hijack it and use it to foment conflict from which they will gain materially. Realistic positive nationalism, focussing on the good on the ingroup, not on the alleged bad of the others, is the way forward. EDL etc are a menace and serve to advance negative nationalism which is a slow death for every nation it touches.

The Lockerbie Bombing was a CIA job, used as na excuse to put economic sanctions on Libya and demonise the man. Our enemies play the long game, and were happy to murder the people on the æroplane in order to justify the mass murders and invasion of this year.

Debate is vital for learning. No one has all the answers, and we all change our worldview as we receive new information. Debate is good. Sadly, the Marxist takeover of education, culture and society at large has made real debate difficult, and confined to the finges. As for nutcases, well, that is somewhat subjective. In the USSR, people who spoke against the State were diagnosed as mentally ill, and silenced. Their arguments went unheard, as who wants to debate with a madman? Madness is next to genius, so dismissing anyone without really taking the time to look into his or her ideas is dangerous.

Rufus said...

Footie! Dire. I have been to maytches in the past. I have seen Huddersfield Town kick a ball backwards and forwards, but I have never got into the hatred of other teams. What is the point? Football has become a safety valve where inherent natural feelings can be expressed. It is the holding cell for patriotism, and like a cell, it eventually kills the inmate. I have no interest in the tribal sport nonsense, and certainly can see no value in attacking people who wear the colurs of Leeds, Manchester or wherever. I'd rather spend time enjoying the company of good people, and exploring culture, the countryside, or spending time in nature. Controlled regimented activities exists to boost the coffers of the organisers, and have a cultural value of zero.

I agree that preservation of one's own should be a positive phenomenon. Hatred of others, elitism, supremacism, imperialism etc are tools of the internationalists, and we should have nothing to do with them.

Anonymous said...

"I agree that preservation of one's own should be a positive phenomenon. Hatred of others, elitism, supremacism, imperialism etc are tools of the internationalists, and we should have nothing to do with them."

Which is exactly why I don't hate Africans, Asians, and all other immigrants - indeed in a conversation I may get on better with them than indigenous hooligans. Of course only a minority of our kind are hooligans but you have to admit, they do exist. They also exist amongst immigrant groups as well.

There are quite a few Halal shops in certain parts of my city. If you enter into one branch of Morrisons in my city, the customers are indigenous white old people, poor people and students (about 70%) and immigrants (the other 30%). Chinese and Pakistanis and Nigerians and people from around the world will shop there. I have no hate for any of them, because they are human, like me. I can start a conversation with any of them and it will probably go well because we are all human.

But it is a simple fact that indigenous European, white (and leftists will try to deny that white people are the indigenous population of Europe - essentially denying reality and biology) populations are on the decline and left-wing social policies along with economics and the mass media are responsible for such a decline.

Today, we live in a more globalized world than ever. This has had a massive economic effect on the planet. Maggie Thatcher gave the UK's industry a big "fuck you" in the 80s. What it has resulted in is towns with large unemployment. Areas where the service industries (feminine) predominate over the heavy industries of the past (masculine). You say you have your roots in Wales. I am guessing that there are many ex-mining towns in the valleys that have massive unemployment and probably loads of people on benefits, with no hope. Is it better than life in Somalia? Yes, but it isn't a psychologically satisfying life. Living on benefits is existing - not living.

There is still oil in the North Sea. But that won't last forever.

Leftists often talk more like women than women themselves (DRoFC).

Anonymous said...

If you compare Norway and Somalia, they are almost polar opposities as far as countries go.

There is no hope. There's no point in even trying to take action. We are defeated. No matter how much of a stud a white male is at sex, his genetic/racial/sexual progeny will not prosper in the long term. This applies in Europe as well as America.

Simply, as a result of not being black, I do not feel like a real man (mainly due to disparities in fertility rates between Europe and Africa), even though I am six foot three and I have an eight inch penis and normal condoms are too small and tight for me.

The disparities in fertility rates between Europe and Africa make me unable to maintain an erection during sex. If you're part of a dying people (I mean in the long term), how can you feel virile? The result is rage.

What I say is not myth but fact. I am looking into the long term - centuries into the future - and I will be proven right.

Any critics must take my long-sightedness into account. A common argument is that people with far-right views are ignorant. Whilst that may be true of some people, the truth is never so simple. Intelligence must also be contrasted with knowledge.

What is even the point of having sex at all, in a multiracial society? You might as well wish for that asteroid to come and wipe us all out as quickly as possible.

Anonymous said...

What bothers me is the idea of long-term ethnic/racial/sexual/genetic death. Hundreds of years into the future. In light of this, the sex act itself is one of total impotence. Even if you are a complete stud, and you're a white male, you are TOTALLY IMPOTENT LIKE A FUCKING EUNUCH! Liberal society means that you can do what you want as long as it does not 'harm' others. I see that as a bad thing.

Anonymous said...

The qualities that make black women unattractive to most white men (dark skin, curly hair, big broad nose, wide protruding lips, and so on, which are the opposite of what white women have) do not make black men unattractive to most white women because men and women have different things that they look for in partners of the opposite sex. The qualities (i.e. physical features) that make women attractive are not so important to women in terms of what they look for in a man. To look at a person in terms of their physical features - as a 'thing' - instead of their personhood may seem inhumane, but remember that the masculine domain is things, and the feminine domain is people. Practically all inventions and discoveries were the work of males. The feminist argument that because women had been denied the opportunity to invent and discover does not hold up, because like all Marxist ideologies, it denies innate biological difference.

Not caring about your ethnic/genetic/racial group being on the long term path to extinction, in males, should be seen as a kind of madness. Not caring about your own kind's sexual/genetic/racial/reproductive success is mad. The most basic requirements for survival are not being met. If you want to make a ethnic/genetic/racial group extinct, disempowering the men is a key step that you have to take. It has been suggested that many males with 'far right' views are sexually frustrated - some are, no doubt, but it's far too simple an explanation to account for all the reasons. In order for your ethnic/genetic/racial group to survive firstly it must be endogamous, and secondly it must produce a sufficient number of children. This must continue infinitely for generations into the future. That is to say, even after you are dead, a future descendent with your genes may engage in race-mixing, even if this is hundreds of years into the future. What annoys me is not being able to control that.

In America, there is a cultural taboo about interracial sex (and relationships) that does not exist in Britain and Europe, or not nearly to the same extent as in America. That is to say, in Britain and Europe, there is no real 'immunity' to it.

Anonymous said...

http://www.animalsuffering.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7614

Even Peter Singer believes that molluscs do not deserve animal rights. I wonder about Morrissey...

The modern left has become a religion without most people realising it. Yet, there are certain issues which the left has not yet acheived. They're well on course with gay marriage but the legalization of paedophilia is on their agenda. If the Marxist scum want to destroy the Western world that much and can acheive it, adding insult to injury wouldn't be too much of a problem.