Television is a powerful tool for whoever controls it. Studies have found that watching television is detrimental to physical health. As well as slowing the metabolism, leading to obesity and general lethargy, in the long term, sustained use of the television has been found to shorten the lifespan of the viewer. Like a cancer eating away at the human body, television is responsible for early death. Surely there should be a health warning for television viewers? There is not; and the physical damage caused by television is as nothing compared to the psychological damage. Hence the lack of warning, and the active encouragement for everyone to watch as much television as practicable. Television sets are no longer just found in the home, but also in pubs, shopping centres, medical surgeries and a whole range of other places. This is for a reason.
I have not watched television now for nearly a decade, having had to ween myself off from excessive viewing from 1997 to 2002. The fact that it took five years to cut back my viewing is indicative of how much poison I eagerly absorbed before 1997. When I urge people to throw out the brain-washing machine which dominates the living room, I am not pontificating; I have experienced the grip of the machine first hand, and have used all the usual excuses of watching many channels to get a balanced view of the world. Looking back, that argument is bogus. Television is anti-social and manipulative. It teaches the viewer how to think, feel and act; dominates conversation ('did you see such and such?') and undermines critical thinking.
It is an odd experience talking to people who do watch television and constantly use phrases they have subliminally absorbed. For some, the idea of not watching television seems bizarre, to the point of heresy. Many people who are obsessed with buying the latest gadgets that television says they must have, do not realise how they have been used. Liberating oneself from the toxic machine helps to free one from the incessant marketing which passes for culture; it allows one the time to reconnect with reality. Television addicts see non-viewers as oddballs. Is it not truly those who allow a machine to control their minds and daily routine that are odd?
An example of the mendacious power of television was sent to me by a reader who has friends who are still victims of the mind-controlling box in the living room. They are fans of a television series called Foyle's War. This series is set during the Second World War, and takes the form of a detective mystery. However, it serves to re-educate the viewer, by pushing Establishment propaganda full of historical inaccuracies. This is a common method and can be seen in 'news' broadcasts as well as entertainment programming. George Orwell wrote of the rewriting of history and Big Brother watching us, but it seems we are watching Him.
The reader who alerted me to Foyle's War, noted that the series has been screened over and over, ensuring that many more people will be exposed to its propaganda. A typically odious episode is named 'The White Feather', sneeringly referring to the symbol of cowardice. Created by the Talmudist, Anthony Horowitz, Foyle's War is far from impartial. In fact, behind the facade of being an entertainment programme, Horowitz's hatred of the Goyim can clearly be seen by anyone who has not been completely indoctrinated by the Establishment media. He subtly pushes the idea that the Jews are a persecuted minority and that the Goyim have a moral duty to serve them, to the point of fighting for their desires. Subtly? Subtly in comparison with some other writers of his tribe.
In the White Feather, we are introduced to the character Guy Pearce, and his organisation, the Friday Club. Pearce is modelled on Captain Archibald H. Maule Ramsay, Member of Parliament, key figure in the Monday Club and author of The Nameless War; a book which examines the role of Talmudists in the British, French and Russian revolutions, and also the criminal takeover of the Establishment by the tribe who have been at war with humanity since their Elders concocted the Chosen Race claptrap. From his first appearance, Ramsay, sorry Pearce is painted as the embodiment of evil. The Talmudist, Horowitz, wastes no time in slandering a great European whose only crime was to speak the truth about the anti-Christian menace.
Pearce is shewn holding a sparsely attended pacifist meeting in which he praises Hitler as the saviour of Germany, and names the Jews and Bolsheviks as the ones who started the Second World War and as the ones who benefit from Europeans fighting one another. Hitler aside, the statement is of course true, excepting that the Bolshevik leaders were Jews, thus making Horowitz's distinction solely for the purpose of creating the image of Jews as blameless victims; whereas their leaders were to blame for every aspect of the war, on every side. Pearce's pacifist speech is juxtaposed with his violent goons beating an innocent Englishman for voicing opposition to the meeting whilst walking passed the hall. Within the first few minutes, the viewer has been taught that Pearce is evil, and his organisation is a violent Nazi front.
The story develops into an investigation of an anti-war saboteur, who is painted as a Nazi sympathiser, but uses her left hand for the Roman Salute! It is made clear that the poor wench has been corrupted by the diabolical Pearce; a horrible man who hates Slavs and Jews, and plans to become the Hitler of Britain.
The character assassination of Captain Ramsay is beyond contemptible. The real Ramsay was not a Nazi-sympathiser, but a British patriot. He worked alongside Neville Chamberlain in attempting to prevent a war for international finance, and spoke out against Hitler's militarisation of Germany. Ramsay was a patriot who wanted peace. Ramsay had unearthed evidence of the British Establishment's control of the IRA. The Establishment drafted Regulation 18B for the official purpose of dealing with the IRA, although their operatives remained at large whilst innocent patriots were imprisoned without charge in conditions far harsher than imposed on common criminals.
Having experienced first-hand the devastation of Europe in the Great War, at the will of the same sadistic parasitic forces who engineered the Second World War, Ramsay was a true European hero enduring prison for speaking against the un-necessary bloodshed which served only the Zionists who would go on to establish the anti-human State of Israel on Palestinian soil. His treatment by Horowitz is disgraceful, and indeed gives credibility to those who argue that Britain is an occupied nation, controlled by our spiritual, moral, and material enemies.
During Pearce's speech, the backdrop is of the lightening flash used by Oswald Moseley's Blackshirts. Ramsay was an opponent of the pro-German Moseley, so linking the two is illogical and disingenuous. In the case of Moseley, upon the Declaration of War, Moseley ordered his Blackshirts to join the army and fight against Germany; a lunacy which served only to kill more Europeans for Talmudic interests. In contrast, Ramsay was interned for pleading with the Prime Minister to act against the internal enemies who were manipulating the Establishment media to secure a bloody and costly war. He remained a champion of peace throughout the war, and was beloved of the people. Ramsay was no traitor. He was a genuine patriot motivated by a love for his nation. Ironically, Pearce-Ramsay is shewn accurately discussing the Jewish control of the media; this to lead the viewer to associate opposition to Talmudic control as treason. This speaks volumes about Horowitz and the media in the UK.
Anti-Semitism is dragged up repeatedly throughout the programme. Opposition to war is hammered home as opposition to Jewry. Horowitz ironically links the pro-war lobby with the leaders of Jewry. As we know now, the European genocide was fought to destroy Europe and boost the power of the Elders of the self-Chosen few.
The propaganda piece closes with the detective grilling an associate who has been drawn in by the evil Friday Club, and has borrowed from them a copy of the Protocols of Zion. The detective states that only evil people believe that the Protocols are a blueprint for the Talmudic takeover of the world. No Horowitz, it is evil and deluded people who deny their validity.
I would like to thank the reader who wrote to me about Foyle's War. I can see that the anti-Goy bias of the Establishment has become worse even than it was when I watched television. If I had not already consigned the television to the scrap heap, this programme would have made me do so.
Television is a weapon of the enemy. Recently, the Iranian channel PressTV, was taken off air in the UK. Although the channel tows the Zionist line on many issues, on occasion it strays towards honest reporting. Such is the total censorship of information in the UK, that not even a slight deviation from the Establishment position will be tolerated.
We are bombarded daily by the lies of the Establishment. Is it rational to invite the greatest lie machine of all time into our own homes, and to pay for the privilege of being brain-washed? Entertainment programming such as Foyle's War, the 'news', pop music, celebrity gossip etc etc, are pumped out 24 hours per day, every day. A central feature of the Brain-washing technique is repetition. We need time to think for ourselves, in order to break free of the mind manipulators. If you haven't already, throw the Talmud in the Living room into the bin. Free your minds. Without a free mind to begin with, there is no hope of freedom from the internationalist menace.
Captain Ramsay - The Nameless War (pdf) **READ THIS!**
Foyle's War: The White Feather (youtube)
Establishment-biased article on Foyle's War (Daily Telegraph)