Establishment Wars: Murder for Financial Gain

The above video by Dahlia S. Wasfi graphically shows what the wars against humanity, outrageously and mockingly described as humanitarian wars, are really about. Doubtless the censors at Youtube will swoop on this video - it is already only available to those who sign in and give their identity (possibly to be used at some stage by the Establishment under Nacht und Nebel style political incarceration).

Why is access to this particular video subject to control? Children can readily see videos encouraging them to embrace all manner of perversion and to embrace materialism as the only way of life (in 'pop' videos and children's TV programmes); the 'news' is filled with gruesome imagery of slaughter which should make people sick and angry (but due to being deliberately desensitised provokes little reaction if any); soaps are weapons for social engineering to make people comply to the destruction of society, lest they be seen as out-of-step with what the TV dictates is 'normal' (being 'different' just won't do, ironically); even the weather forecast is filled with Global Warming scare stories to indoctrinate and terrify the populace into supporting lies which will fleece them financially and remove their freedom to live as they see fit. Dr Wasfi must be a heinous individual pushing something really vile if we can see every evil imaginable at leisure, but cannot see her work. Is this the case?

So what has the creator of the video done to cause such offence? She has committed the most unacceptable of all crimes, she has told the truth - a truth which the Establishment does not wish anyone to hear. The 'War on Terror' is a War OF Terror, and the real terrorists are the barbarians who wear the NATO emblem on their uniforms. It is the military of the UK, USA, France, Italy et al who are murdering ordinary people across the globe. Al-Qaeda is a creation of the CIA, which is itself a puppet of British Military Intelligence (MI5/6). The myth of Al-Qaeda being the enemy has been shattered once and for all by the FACT that Al-Qaeda soldiers are right-now fighting alongside NATO forces to extinguish the flame of freedom in Libya.

The wars of aggression being conducted using the military of the West are wars for profit. They are wars of corporate imperialism. In Afghanistan, the prize was Gold and Opium, in Iraq and Libya, Oil. In every war, the construction of permanent military bases to defend multi-national corporations has underlined the true reason for the invasions. The profits of the multi-nationals are not worth a single drop of blood - military or otherwise. The parasites-in-chief who have replanted the Opium fields destroyed by the Taliban don't give a damn about ordinary people anywhere. All they are interested in is ensuring they continue to gain financially from the misery caused by heroin addiction back home. The Establishment are cold-blooded calculating materialists who have no empathy with humanity. The Islamic accusation that the USA-UK-NATO Axis of Evil is the Great Satan is not entirely unjustified. We, the people, are not evil, but those who rule over us certainly are.

Kudos to Dr Wasfi. Doubtless the masses will continue to watch sport, be obsessed with fashion and the latest gadgets, and continue to fund their own serfdom whilst muttering approval for whatever lies the Establishment war machine feed them. The masses will always be like cattle - but this doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. It is the intelligent and influential section of the population we need to reach if we are to have any chance of opening the minds of the people to the truth. We need to get busy. Time is against us. Today NATO is after the great Muammar al-Qaddafi and the free people of Libya. Tomorrow they will come for all of us who resist their global gulag. We cannot procrastinate or get bogged down in petty divisions. We need to act now. Knowledge is power - use it.

Henry Kissinger once commented that military men were 'dumb, stupid animals' to be used as pawns for foreign policy. Kissinger may be many things, but a fool he isn't. Military personnel who blindly obey orders, butchering civilians in their own lands deserve the epithet given above. Political Parties which maintain the position that once a war starts, full support must be given to the military, regardless of the justifiability (or lack of) of the war itself, are accomplices to the murder committed by those they support. The only servicemen who deserve our support are those who refuse to obey the criminal orders of their 'superiors'. Mutiny against butchers is not a crime, but a duty. We must encourage our military men to stand up for what is right and disobey en masse. Today we have a military force comprised mainly of Europeans and other Occidentals bombing the peoples of Africa and southwest Asia. Should the time come for the homelands of todays murderers to be attacked, military personnel from the Orient could well be used. The Dumb Stupid Animals who murder civilians abroad today, condemn civilians at home tomorrow.

Dr Wasfi's site with more forbidden information can be found HERE - at least until a puppet ruler such as Barry Soetoro has it removed from Google and other search engines, if not closed completely. We need to disseminate the truth and undermine the despots who wish to crush all our freedoms.

7/7 Ripple Effect: Justice Versus Secret State

The following was posted: 29th May 2011 07:19 PDT by FINAL CONFLICT. For those outside the UK, the BNP is the largest patriotic party (nationalist/populist) and the EDL the largest street organisation (soccer hooligans mainly). The BNP was originally a pro-British organisation but has descended into an anti-Muslim one. The EDL is solely anti-Muslim with an agenda which can only harm the British people, especially women. Both organisations are rabidly Zionist, kowtowing to Israel in the most embarrassing manner. Despite this Talmudophilia, they are berated as 'far-right extremists', 'neo-Nazis', 'haters' etc by the Establishment media. They are unwittingly (I hope) serving the Establishment agenda. Such is the state of the patriotic movement in the UK. Final Conflict is a part of the International Third Position which grew out of the original National Front when that party fell into neo-imperialism and reactionary conservatism in the 1980s. The BNP is a joke, controlled by profiteers. The EDL is dangerous and must be exposed for the Establishment internationalist trap it is. Kudos to FC for an excellent expose. Original link HERE.

The stories of 911 and 7/7 are unravelling as fast as the JFK, Dr David Kelly and Osama Bin Laden stories.

This is why the "patriot" movements who try to screech "it's all the muzzies," like the BNP and EDL are (whether they like it or not) part of the con. They are a small ingredient in the Neo Con/Zionist/Israel Lobby recipe.

Right: The BNP & EDL prove that Muslims are taking over America.

Their job was to keep the white working class (still a sizable proportion of the British population) bumbling along, blaming the Muslims for all their ills.

• We were dragged into foreign wars. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.

• The banks dragged us to the edge of total ruination. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.

• The politicians filled their pockets as we were taxed to the hilt. FOCUS ON THE MUSLIMS.

The world is falling apart. The very many woes affecting us (including immigration) are the work of the Masonic-Zionist elite, and that same elite are playing the BNP/EDL (and whoever comes along next) so that we as nationalists never pose a risk to their policies.

The Muslims have been here for 40 odd years, give or take. They have been the government/media enemy for the last 20 odd years, give or take.

Do you, nationalist, really think we had no problems before this time? Do you think our people lived in freedom before this time?

Wake up.

The Muslim issue is just a very small part of a much bigger problem, and the elites behind those problems (the oligarchs, the fat cats, the media moguls, the big businessmen, the politicos etc.) are of the same Masonic-Zionist elite; that is why the family, Christianity, nationalism etc. have been under attack for so long.

Nick Griffin still Twitters incessantly about the Muslims. It is boring. It is futile. It is treacherous.

The Masonic-Zionist elite are pulling the strings. Watch the marionettes dance.

Link:
7/7 Ripple Effect VICTORY

Elizabeth Windsor - False Monarch and Despot

The Royal Parasites have no legal right to rule. We need a Republic - Now!

Source: http://mtrial.org/node/9 - a site well worth examining.

Ashkenazim: stooges for the Sephardim?

When trying to uncover the identities of the forces behind the drive for a single global authority to enslave humanity, the phenomenon of Zionism frequently comes to the surface. When one delves more closely, the 'Jewish' nature of Zionism becomes less clear as many non-Jews are Zionist, and many Jews reject Zionism. This is a quandary which demands study.

Undoubtedly, the Rothschild clan are key players in the globalist movement. Indeed it could be stated with clarity that Israel is in essence a fiefdom of the Rothschilds. The question is whether Israelis themselves are aware of the nature of their Zionist overlords.

Israel is populated by various types of people who are described as Jews. The majority of Israeli Jews are Ashkenazic, followed by a substantial number of Sephardic Jews. There are also Falashas (Beta Israel), Oriental Jews and others, but they are insignificant in number or power. The Falashas from Ethiopia, for example, are not considered to be real Jews by virtually every other Jewish community, which is hardly surprising considering that the Talmudic description of Africans is so 'racist' that were it not for the Jewish control of the Race Industry, it would be classed as hate literature and banned. Focusing only on the main factions of the Jewish people, the distinction between Ashkenazim and Sephardim is of great importance.

The majority of people who are called Jews today belong to the Ashkenazim. The name Ashkenazi is Hebrew for Germany. The Ashkenazim are descended from the Jews of Eastern and Northern Europe, and traditionally speak Yiddish (a corruption of German containing elements of Hebrew - a well known example being Oy Vey which comes from the German for Oh Dear, Au Weh). The Sephardim, in contrast, are the descendents of the Jews who settled in Spain. The name Sephardic means Spain (Iberia) in Hebrew, and the traditional language is Ladino, which is a corruption of Spanish with Hebrew mixed in. The Sephardim trace their ancestry back to the Middle East before moving into the Iberian Penninsula. After their expulsion from Spain in the 15th century, the Sephardic Jews who moved into North Africa and other Arab lands, including Palestine, became known as the Mizrachim (Hebrew for Eastern). Those who moved to other parts of the world retained the named Sephardim. The Sephardic Mizrachim comprised only very small minorities in the lands in which they settled.

The movement of Jews from nation to nation is complicated by the fact that substantial numbers converted to the religion of their host nations and remained as Marranos (false converts). One only needs to visit Catalunya in Northeast Spain/Southwest France to experience the Jewish culture of the region from which Jews officially left or converted but in fact largely remained as false-Christians. In Muslim nations the same practice occurred with people openly embracing Islam, secretly holding to the teachings of Talmud.

The fundamental problem with the nature of those who are known as Jews is the Talmud. The genuine Jews who lived in the Middle East during Biblical times followed the Torah. It is from the Torah that the religion of Christianity sprang as a fulfillment of prophecy. Those who adhered to the Torah continued the religion of the Israelites and became known as Christians. Those who rejected the Torah and followed the heretical and Satanic teachings of the Talmud (which negates everything taught in Torah and teaches that God obeys the Rabbis!) became what we would call Jews today. As the real religion became known as Christianity, it is logical that those who rejected it to the point of implacable opposition should be called anti-Christians, with their teachings anti-Christ. Judæo-Christians and Christian-Zionists are but further examples of the Judaised anti-Christian mentality. To complicate matters, as well as nominal Christians who accept the Talmudic belief in the Jewish Master Race, sorry Chsen People, there are Torah-observing Jews who reject the Talmud but do not embrace Christianity. These include the Karaites and the 'Jews for Jesus' sect, both of which are persecuted by Talmudists.

An important aspect of the 'Jewish question' is the ethnic dimension. There is the Christian Identity theory that the original Israelites moved en masse into Europe early in the Christian/Common Era and that therefore the real 'Jews' are the Anglo-Saxons, both spiritually and ethnically. This is controversial area which requires research. I would advise people who are interested in this idea to visit the following links:

http://www.firstchurchoftheinternet.org/anglo/anglo2.htm
http://www.kinsmanredeemer.com/messagesindex.htm
http://www.christianidentitychurch.net/articles.htm

Christian Identity maintains that the modern Jews are not Israelites and therefore have no claim to modern Israel. This argument may hold for the Israelites who stayed true to the Torah, but what about those who embraced the heresy of the Talmud which became the new religion of Judaism? These people were the ancestors of the Sephardim, and the core of what we call the Jewish people.

The Sephardic Jews who held fast to the Talmud originated the millenia long battle against the non-Jews (non-Talmudists) which continues to this day within modern Zionism. The racist supremacist belief in the Jewish Master Race as the only humans on the planet (all other races are Goyim (cattle)), which underpins Zionism is purely Talmudic in nature. There are those who argue that it is only the Ashkenazim who believe the Chosen people lie, but this cannot be so. The Ashkenazim came originally from the Khazar Empire, and were not Jewish by race only by religion, hence the distinction between the Sephardic Jews and the Ashkenazic Jews.

The Khazar converts who were the original Ashkenazim were taught by Sephardic Rabbis. There were logical political reasons for the Khazar Empire to embrace Talmudism in order to not be absorbed by the Christians or the Muslims on their borders. For the Sephardim, the Khazar converts provided a mass of militarily strong Talmud-observers to fight both religions and ensure the continuity of Talmudism as a distinct force, with the possibility of the Goyim awakening to the Talmudic menace, and uniting to fight it, thwarted.

The supremacist ideology of the Talmud is the force behind globalist Zionism. A people who genuinely believe that they have been chosen by God to rule over all others (who their ideology proclaims to be lower animals fit only to serve them and not worthy of empathy or any consideration) cannot do anything but perceive itself as the natural and rightful ruler of the world. This ideology was not created by the likes of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, or Theodor Herzl, but rather was formulated by a cabal of Rabbis millenia ago. To his credit, Herzl initially argued for full assimilation of the Jewish people which would have ended any claims to a land for Jews only from which to rule over the Goyim. Indeed, had Herzl's plan been successful, the 'Jews' would have disappeared into broader humanity. His later adoption of Zionism has proven to be a disaster for all humanity, Jews included. One has to wonder what were the real reasons for his volte face - and who forced him to abandon an idea which could have saved us all from international materialism. The stench of Rothschild comes to mind.

The role of the Ashkenazim in modern Zionism is so profound that their very visibility raises questions. Ashkenanic Jews are modern-day Khazars. The Khazars converted to Judaism under the instruction of the Sephardic Jews, but were never afforded the status of full Jews insofar as being given equality. How could they be? Converts to a religion which is based on the idea of racial superiority cannot by definition be equal to those of the 'Divinely Chosen Race'. Christian Zionists grovel at the feet of those they see as Chosen, but they do not have the arrogance (or chutzpah!) to believe that serving the Chosen in any way makes them their equal. The Ashkenazim may be Jews by religion, but they will never be Jews by blood, therefore they will never be Jews! This fact is evident in the contrived hatred between the two factions, which is designed to prevent them from inter-breeding, just as the religion places the strongest prohibition against 'marrying out' and thereby destroying the race.

The Khazars were created in the manner of a Golem to do the work of the Jews. The Sephardim have used the Ashkenazim from the beginning to be the soldiers in their war for global domination. The Rabbinical ideology of National Socialism which we now know as Zionism was used by Ashkenazic Jews in Germany to create conditions which would justify the establishment of the State of Israel as a base for global operations. Ashkenazim took over the German Workers Party, even adding their own term 'National Socialist' to that party's name. Those who woke up to the anti-European nature of the Party were eliminated in the Night of the Long Knives - ironically modern neo-Nazis still bow to the Ashkenazim who preached European strength but delivered Europe on a plate to international finance. The Master Race ideology of the NSDAP was pure Talmudism - as is to be expected when one studies the real power behind the party.

Considering the racial dimension of Judaism, it is inconceivable that the Sephardim would suddenly accept members of a different race as equals. Therefore the Ashkenazim can never attain the status of Chosen. If the Jews were indeed a special race chosen by God, then no amount of political and religious rhetoric could afford any other race the same status. Only God could do that, and He hasn't made any such declaration, unless one accepts that Jesus abolished the Chosen Race idea. If one is of the Abrahamic religion, then either one believes the Talmudic idea that there is only one race Chosen by God, or one accepts that this Covenant was nullified with the coming of Jesus and that all people are of equal worth in the eyes of God. You can't have it both ways! The Ashkenazim cannot win equality with the Sephardim unless they reject the Talmud. It makes sense for Sephardic Jews to uphold the Talmud. It is insane for Ashkenazic Jews to do so.

The Ashkenazim are the collective Golem of the Sephardim. Is it possible that they were used to establish Israel in order to focus attention on the ideology of Zionism and thereby keep the Sephardim hidden whilst step-by-step achieving mastery of the world? What better way to consolidate power than to create a stooge to do all the dirty work, then to allow for the stooge to be destroyed in order to gain complete control of the entire world? The current focus on Zionism as a world power makes sense if those who control all forms of information transmission want it to be perceived as a powerful force. The manipulation of Muslims on one side (with anti-Zionist supporters) and Zionists (Judaic, Christian, Hindu etc) on the other, may well lead to the destruction of Israel and perhaps to the demise of the Ashkenazim. In the aftermath of a Third World War, the ideologies of both sides will become an irrelevance. What is guaranteed is the establishment of a single global authority to prevent a further apocalyptic conflict - just as prophesied in the Talmud!

There are two possibilities to be considered here. The first possibility is that the Ashkenazi Golem has freed itself from the control of its Sephardic creator, in which case it has become an insane nihilistic monster with genuine hatred for the Sephardim as well as the rest of humanity. The advent of the Sabbatean/Frankist cult may support this total negation of Torah. Perhaps through Qabalah this unlikely outcome has been achieved. The second possibility is that the Sephardic plan is running smoothly and the Ashkenazim are set to take the fall to pave the way for absolute mastery of the world by the Sephardic elite. It could be that all the cults which have come to public knowledge are but further red herrings to keep focus away from the real driving force which we experience as the anti-moral, anti-human, materialist movement. In that case it begs the question as to the true strength of those who we call Jews, 'but are not Jews'. Perhaps the Synagogue of Satan really is the physical manifestation of the forces of the Light Bringer, Lucifer. That of course shifts the resistance into the metaphysical, which is an area which certainly could not be covered in this article.

If the Jewish question wasn't complicated enough, there are Jews who adhere to the Talmud but reject Zionism. See the following link for more on these Jews:

http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/

Attacking 'the Jews' for our predicament is like believing in man-made Global warming. It is simplistic to the point of banality. Most Jews are totally unaware of the forces manipulating them. The vast majority play no part in the drive toward global domination. Attacking Jews per se only aids those who seek to sacrifice them for their diabolical masters. National Socialism in Germany prevented the irrevocable assimilation of European Jewry with the majority population.

The likes of the ADL exist to scare Jews into accepting a self-image as being a persecuted and hated people who cannot live outside the Jewish womb. The only solution is for Jews to see the Rabbis and self appointed elders for the abusers they are and to refuse to live in fear. Non-Jews can help to this end by refusing to play the role of persecutor and 'anti-Semite'. The goal of those in the hidden elite is to pit Israel against Islam in order to enslave us all, we must ensure we do not fall into the trap of joining either camp.

We know that Muslims did not commit the 9/11 atrocity. We need to take the next step and re-examine how we see Jews in general. Regardless of how people feel about being seen as Goyim, non-Jews are in an unfortunate position in that only Jews can stop the monsters who hide behind them. At this stage in the unfolding of global events, the veracity of the Chosen People idea is of no real import. What matters is stopping the lunatics who are using Jews and non-Jews alike by refusing to act as anti-Semites or as servile Israelophiles. This is a challenge which we must win - all of us, Jews included, nay, Jews especially. To fail is to lose everything - and to condemn all humanity outside the inner Satanic cabal to perpetual serfdom. The Talmudic Heaven on Earth will be in truth Hell on Earth. This, we cannot allow.

Good News!! Persecuted 7/7 Activist beats the Establishment!

The following was written by Debra Siddons for Henrymakow.com. I apologise for the problems in text size and hope this does not overly distract the reader from the important information in the article. The acquittal of John Anthony Hill should bring strength to everyone who opposes the tyranny and lies of the British Establishment. Congratulations to John - His victory is Our victory...

" If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days."

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH) Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the 12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of you less familiar with this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the following links:-

http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

There are two very important precedents that were established with this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was based on two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, and with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.

In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the second point. At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited.

The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece of man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect. To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times, which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her other numerous crimes.

All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "her majesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority from her. All cases brought by the state are "Regina vs. Xxxxxxx", which means they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn't really the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or the jurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do any of "her majesty's" courts or judges.

Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth could lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are obviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is by a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury trial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth.

No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority.

That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the Laws of God.

These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at the start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.

To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two pieces of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined.

Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God.

Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked awareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, but didn't know. We know now.

For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, we aren't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all you really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the BAR.

So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to this insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread the word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion can begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your freedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World Order".

For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit:
http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm#crimes

By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this simple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a second precedent set during this landmark case.

While the official reason for this trial was to address this trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice", the real reason for this trial was so the authorities could punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect" which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream media reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy theory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of people who see it." That's how powerful the truth really is.

This was the first time this information was shown at an official proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the jurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London on July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For those unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of correcting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the outset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers" (who were also found not guilty).

John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United States and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind Jane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the event.

As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on record.

And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of that official record. This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice sounding words, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of the hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up around us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and the courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of the personal cost.

"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke

Free Ireland, Free Britain. No to Monarchy.

The following inspiring video may anger monarchists, but everything stated is fact. The Windsor gangster family are responsible for most of the evils in the modern world. Their crimes go back through their bloodline into the forgotten times before officially recorded history. They are responsible for Zionism in that they support and benefit from the 'Chosen' people lie. They are financial and spiritual vampyrs sucking the life force of the world. Their crimes include the entire banking system of usury, slavery, imperialism, the class system, both world wars (and the developing third one), libertine liberalism, to mention but a few. The beheading of the effigy of Elizardbreath Windsor may only be symbolic, but it serves as an image of justice which one day, hopefully, may become a reality for the entire bloodline...

The following is a speech by the Irish patriot, James Connolly, on the visit of George Windsor to Ireland in 1911. What he said was correct then, and is correct now - even more so.

Fellow-Workers,

As you are aware from reading the daily and weekly newspapers, we are about to be blessed with a visit from King George V.

Knowing from previous experience of Royal Visits, as well as from the Coronation orgies of the past few weeks, that the occasion will be utilised to make propaganda on behalf of royalty and aristocracy against the oncoming forces of democracy and National freedom, we desire to place before you some few reasons why you should unanimously refuse to countenance this visit, or to recognise it by your presence at its attendant processions or demonstrations. We appeal to you as workers, speaking to workers, whether your work be that of the brain or of the hand – manual or mental toil – it is of you and your children we are thinking; it is your cause we wish to safeguard and foster.

The future of the working class requires that all political and social positions should be open to all men and women; that all privileges of birth or wealth be abolished, and that every man or woman born into this land should have an equal opportunity to attain to the proudest position in the land. The Socialist demands that the only birthright necessary to qualify for public office should be the birthright of our common humanity.

Believing as we do that there is nothing on earth more sacred than humanity, we deny all allegiance to this institution of royalty, and hence we can only regard the visit of the King as adding fresh fuel to the fire of hatred with which we regard the plundering institutions of which he is the representative. Let the capitalist and landlord class flock to exalt him; he is theirs; in him they see embodied the idea of caste and class; they glorify him and exalt his importance that they might familiarise the public mind with the conception of political inequality, knowing well that a people mentally poisoned by the adulation of royalty can never attain to that spirit of self-reliant democracy necessary for the attainment of social freedom. The mind accustomed to political kings can easily be reconciled to social kings – capitalist kings of the workshop, the mill, the railway, the ships and the docks. Thus coronation and king's visits are by our astute never-sleeping masters made into huge Imperialist propagandist campaigns in favour of political and social schemes against democracy. But if our masters and rulers are sleepless in their schemes against us, so we, rebels against their rule, must never sleep in our appeal to our fellows to maintain as publicly our belief in the dignity of our class – in the ultimate sovereignty of those who labour.

What is monarchy? From whence does it derive its sanction? What has been its gift to humanity? Monarchy is a survival of the tyranny imposed by the hand of greed and treachery upon the human race in the darkest and most ignorant days of our history. It derives its only sanction from the sword of the marauder, and the helplessness of the producer, and its gifts to humanity are unknown, save as they can be measured in the pernicious examples of triumphant and shameless iniquities.

Every class in society save royalty, and especially British royalty, has through some of its members contributed something to the elevation of the race. But neither in science, nor in art, nor in literature, nor in exploration, nor in mechanical invention, nor in humanising of laws, nor in any sphere of human activity has a representative of British royalty helped forward the moral, intellectual or material improvement of mankind. But that royal family has opposed every forward move, fought every reform, persecuted every patriot, and intrigued against every good cause. Slandering every friend of the people, it has befriended every oppressor. Eulogised today by misguided clerics, it has been notorious in history for the revolting nature of its crimes. Murder, treachery, adultery, incest, theft, perjury – every crime known to man has been committed by some one or other of the race of monarchs from whom King George is proud to trace his descent.

We will not blame him for the crimes of his ancestors if he relinquishes the royal rights of his ancestors; but as long as he claims their rights, by virtue of descent, then, by virtue of descent, he must shoulder the responsibility for their crimes.

Fellow-workers, stand by the dignity of your class. All these parading royalties, all this insolent aristocracy, all these grovelling, dirt-eating capitalist traitors, all these are but signs of disease in any social state - diseases which a royal visit brings to a head and spews in all its nastiness before our horrified eyes. But as the recognition of the disease is the first stage towards its cure, so that we may rid our social state of its political and social diseases, we must recognise the elements of corruption. Hence, in bringing them all together and exposing their unity, even a royal visit may help us to understand and understanding, help us to know how to destroy the royal, aristocratic and capitalistic classes who live upon our labour. Their workshops, their lands, their mills, their factories, their ships, their railways must be voted into our hands who alone use them, public ownership must take the place of capitalist ownership, social democracy replace political and social inequality, the sovereignty of labour must supersede and destroy the sovereignty of birth and the monarchy of capitalism.

Ours be the task to enlighten the ignorant among our class, to dissipate and destroy the political and social superstitions of the enslaved masses and to hasten the coming day when, in the words of Joseph Brenan, the fearless patriot of '48, all the world will maintain:

'The Right Divine of Labour
To be first of earthly things;
That the Thinker and the Worker
Are Manhood's only Kings.

Source: http://www.eirigi.org/index.htm

Scotia, just like England, being destroyed by the globalist mafia

The following was sent in as a reply to the article on the victory of the 'Scottish' 'National' Party. The writer has chosen to remain anonymous, which in these days of so-called political correctness, makes much sense. The Police State in the UK is absolute and the idea that using one's real identity will save one from the murderous scum who run this country, is simply ludicrous.

I am publishing this comment as an article, as the writer has knowledge of Scotland which I do not have, and eloquently describes the dire situation north of the border in a manner which demands attention. Thank you anonymous for the following...

I understand urban England is generally in a much more dire situation than Scotland as far as the white British being around is concerned. White people are still very definitely the majority in Scotland, many having lived in an area for generations and having the local accent, but it's becoming less so every year and the changes are becoming increasingly visible. However if you were to go through central Glasgow for example there are many non-whites. The influx of the millions of immigrants under Marxist New Labour has become increasingly visible. When I was a child I had probably only seen black people a couple of times in my life, but now they, along with many other non-whites, are a visible presence that can be observed on the streets of Aberdeen on a daily basis. Once the baby boomer (i.e. those children born just after the second world war into the 1950s and early 60s) generation passes away things are going to start looking extremely bleak indeed. George Street in Aberdeen is now full of 'ethnic' shops and the people that are there reflect that. An old closed down shop that used to be a newsagent run by local folk will sit empty next to a Halal food store or one of these outlets that allows transfers of money to places like Bangladesh and Nigeria, usually through Western Union. There are also some Polish shops as well, and I agree. It seems that amongst the working class in Aberdeen, the 'neds' if you will, Poles are the most hated of immigrant groups, which I think is sad but it reflects what our education system has become, teaching people to have disdain for anything perceived as 'foreign' out of sheer ignorance. Poles and other Eastern Europeans are my personal favourite immigrant group, they're usually friendly enough in my experience.

I've seen a woman with a mixed race grandchild as far north as Elgin and I saw black people in Forres and Fraserburgh. Here we are talking about the real small towns north of which lie little more than the virtually empty Scottish Highlands. White Britain has undergone a decapitation - think about how non-white London is - the smaller towns are where more white people remain. The metropolitan ganglions of the West like London have been thoroughly transformed into majority non-white areas: the small, isolated settlements are the white ones. The truth is this: there is virtually nowhere that is completely white anymore. I noticed a few Indians and Chinese in Wick which is mainland Britain's second most northerly town, but other than that it was mostly just boy racers circling around the small town in their motors and old folk. In Wick I got the feeling of almost stepping into a world semi-stuck in the past when I visited there a couple of years ago. No black people to be seen in Wick, not one.

As the decades pass and turn into centuries, the long-term outlook for the survival of white people as a racial group (rather than a cultural, ethnic or national group) anywhere in the world will be increasingly bleak due to low birth rates, non-white immigration and the problem of racial mixing. It makes me sick to my stomach, not to mention angry, thinking about it. As the people of the West threw away their Christianity following two fratricidal disastrous destructive world wars, they embraced a bit of brief hedonism for a while in the Sixties which was to leave a massive cultural and spiritual void which has destroyed community spirit, destroyed the concept of the family, destroyed tradition, destroyed indigenous culture and replaced it with foreign imports and Americanisation, destroyed once proud industry, and all of this is destroying our race. Left-wing madness, the sort of rubbish that is taught to young people in schools and universities, cultural Marxism if you will, is tantamount to genocide through mediocrity. It may not involve physically killing people but it has the same biological result in the long term, and means that people lead unhappy and unsatisfying lives as a result.

Facebook - Surveillance, Censorship and Mind-pollution.

I am not a fan of Facebook. I joined the network in order to spread the truth about what is really going on in our troubled world. Every article posted here should (in theory) have automatically been re-posted on Facebook. I'm not interested in the mind-numbing posts about people having a cup of tea, getting stoned, 'hooking up' in the manner of unpaid prostitutes (of both sexes), or the tedious obsession with putting other the lyrics to other peoples' songs online, so I stayed away.

Having been sent the above video by RTR.Org I thought it would be an idea to link from that site to Facebook to increase the amount of information I could get out. Surprise surprise, my Facebook account has been disabled. It would seem that it is not only those who organise en masse who have fallen foul of the censors. I wonder what it is I must have said to offend the parasitic Freemasonic Monarchy-loving Sabattean vermin who run Facebook as an information-gathering front for the CIA/MI5?

If anyone is still on Facebook, perhaps it is time to get off it. We are under surveillance in so many forms it is mind-boggling (especially in the heartland of the Black Nobility, the UK). We do not need to help our enemies by volunteering trivia which can be accumulated for psychological profiling and eventually be used as evidence against us. Be sensible - Get off Facebook - Don't feed the wolves who are relentlessly eating away at our freedom.

Slàinte mhath! Now to turn the SNP safety valve victory into a fight for a free Republic.

It is seldom indeed that the shenanigans of the faux democratic system are of any interest other than as an annoyance. Living in a part of England over-run by non-Europeans, the local council elections proved to be of such dubious merit - not a single candidate in my council ward was English, or even from the broader European family. The Establishment party (oops parties!) at least printed their propaganda in English on the reverse side of their pointless internationalist pamphlets, although I suspect this courtesy to the host population will be dispensed with in due course as the last of the Europeans leave the cess pit which was once a strong and vibrant beacon of European culture. My family have lived in this area for many generations - I owe it to generations to come to move out as soon as I can sell up and leave. It is sad but vital for my kin.

What grabbed my attention was not the depressing sewer politics in England, but the outstanding victory for the National Party in Scotland. The SNP won a clear majority in the national election, despite the system being rigged to prevent a single party gaining overall control. Leader of the SNP, Alex Salmond, has promised the people that now he has a mandate to hold a referendum on independence for the Celtic nation, he will deliver the referendum, and (assuming the Scots are allowed to vote as they choose, free from the machinations of Westminster) the great nation of Alba may at last be reborn. Clearly the idea of the Scots being treated with respect by the despots in London is the stuff of fantasy, but to reach this stage is remarkable in itself.

So, what does the victory of the SNP mean for Scotland and the UK? Sadly, it does not mean the fulfilment of the long-cherished dream of freedom from the tyrants in Buckingham Palace. Alex Salmond portrays himself as a true Scot, fighting for the rights of the Scottish people, but he is just as kosher as his counterparts south of the border. He may munch the odd Scotch Pie on the election trail, but I suspect he is more partial to Gefilte Fish at home. Should the people of Scotland understandably vote to break from London in any forthcoming plebiscite, the SNP are in place to ensure that freedom is achieved in name only, with power remaining with the British Establishment as before.

Contrary to popular myth, Scotland was not taken over by England, but rather the Act of Union of 1707 consolidated the power of Freemasonry across the British mainland. The visible focus of power became London, but the Monarchy and their Freemasonic henchmen did not give away any real power. The SNP may speak of independence, but they are mere pantomime actors continuing to perform in the public spotlight, keeping the light of truth away from the reality of the Monarchical Freemasonic Zionist cabal which genuinely controls everything in British political, economic and social life. The SNP are a part of the Establishment and in no way a threat to its continuing control.

In a genuine democracy (such as the one which the British Establishment is now destroying in Libya), the promise of a referendum on independence would be a promise which one could rely upon. However, in the heartland of the Masonic money power, a promise means nothing. Just as with the times that a referendum on membership of the EU (or acceptance of treaties) has been promised in the Westminster elections, and then refused on grounds so tenuous they would make a barrister blush, the promised referendum on Scottish Independence is not as straight forward as it should be. The SNP propose to keep Scotland in the EU, retain the Windsor mafia family as Heads of State, and continue to use the British Pound as currency with full monetary control remaining with the Bank of England!

Let me recap the bizarre definition of Independence as envisioned by the 'Scottish' National Party:

• Continued enslavement in the Zionist European Union (bloc of the Global superstate)
  
• Continued subservience to the Rothschild money power in the City of London
• Continued obedience to the Windsor Mafia and their Freemasonic minions.

Is it just me, or does that sound like the very antithesis of freedom and independence?

The victory of the SNP is positive insofar as it shows that the Scottish people desire freedom from the decadence of London. If Scotland does break free from the Union then all the peoples of the British Isles will gain. The battle now is to ensure that the reality of the SNP's sham independence drive is exposed and that a campaign for real independence is fought - in every nation of the UK. Real independence requires complete financial independence and therefore demands the abolition of the Bank of England with the entire usurious debt-based monetary system being buried alongside it. Independence must mean complete National Freedom - that means withdrawal from all globalist institutions (EU, NATO, UN, IMF, et al). Independence without Social Justice is meaningless. The Monarchy must be abolished, preferably in a permanent manner which prevents the possibility of any of the bloodline from ever being able to return to a position of power at any level, anywhere.

A free Scotland means a free England, Cymru, Mannin, Kernow et al. It also means the end of the occupation of Ireland after centuries of tyrannical terrorist rule by the Monarchy and their puppets in the Orange Order and the Green Lodge. The SNP version of independence is a farce, but the desire of the people is genuine enough. It is time for all Britons to build on the victory in Scotland and to demand real freedom for all the British nations from the evil cabal in the City of London. We are in an uphill fight against the Windsor criminal family, but it is a fight we must win.

Does Elizardbeth Windsor like mint sauce with her meat?