My Tram Experience - Criminalising dissent as London dies

There is a video which has gone viral on youtube.  It concerns a 34 year old Londoner who has dared to air her opinion about the demise of the Capital of England.  She may be uncouth and foul-mouthed, but that doesn't mean that she is not entitled to her views.

The woman in question went into a rant about the impact of immigration into the UK.  The way she made her point may have been unpleasant, but the substance of what she said was correct.  In a nutshell she stated that the UK is no longer the nation it used to be and that our culture has been shattered as a result of mass immigration.

Following her outburst which was videoed and put on youtube, the woman was arrested and charged with racially aggravated assault.  Such is the depth to which the UK has plunged, that merely expressing an opinion can lead to prosecution.  In these dark days of Cultural Marxism, Freedom of Speech is nonexistent.  The ratcheting up of the Surveillance Society has reached the level where anyone can be an agent of the Police State. 

We are constantly told that we fought the 1939-45 War to keep our island free from invasion, and that if we had lost, 'we'd all be speaking German'.  Well, our people died, on both sides of the English Channel, and following the military defeat of Europe, our treacherous government betrayed those who fought in the War; as a result of their neo-Marxist policies, we were invaded.  It is true that we are not speaking German, but in many schools, English is a foreign language.  As the woman on the tram ineloquently put it, our culture has been trashed and our homeland taken over.

Comments on the initial Tram video have largely been aimed at insulting the host nation, and claiming that our island has been enriched by immigration.  Examples such as the arrival of the Romans, Vikings, Anglo-Saxons, Normans et al have been used to create the myth of the changing character of the people.  All these immigrations were over many years and all of the same European stock.  The number of non-Europeans who came to our shores prior to the tragedy of the Second World War was minuscule.  If the level of non-European immigration had continued at very low levels, our culture would have remained intact, and the newcomers would have been absorbed.  Post-1945, the UK hasn't experienced immigration, but invasion.

It is a very sad day for the UK when speaking one's mind gains Police attention.  If the generation which took up arms in 1939 had known what would be the result of defeating our European brethren for the benefit of the Khazar elite, they would have used their guns more wisely.

29th November: International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People

The 29th November has been designated by the United Nations as the International day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People.  The United Nations is notorious for creating days to mark all manner of usually politically correct issues.  Unlike the ludicrous 27th January commemoration of the non-gassing of the Jews in the European internment camps, today's Observance Day marks a real tragedy, and an ongoing one at that.

Since the Jewish Minister, Balfour, in the nominally British Government of 1917, issued his infamous Declaration promising the land of the Palestinians to a people with no legitimate claim to the territory, the Palestinians have been a people whose suffering has been endorsed by the international community.

Sixty years to the month after the issuing of the Balfour Declaration, the civilised and proud nation of Palestine had been so utterly destroyed by the Zionist invaders, that the plight of the indigenous people could no longer be ignored by the United Nations.  

Founded as an instrument of the Jewish money power, the United Nations has proven time and again that it does not serve the peoples of the world, but only the Internationalist One-worlders.  For the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People to come into existence at all (and especially from the Zionist-puppet organisation, the UN), was a remarkable defeat for the Zionists who occupy Palestine. 

Contrary to the lies of the Zionist Establishment, the land upon which Israel was built, was not 'a land without a people', but rather was very much populated.  Palestine was a vibrant nation which, alongside the Lebanon, more greatly resembled the nations of the Mediterranean than those to its east.  When one sees images of the devastated Gaza Strip and the impoverished West Bank, one is not seeing the true Palestine, which was an honourable and cultured land.

The Zionist mafia literally bombed Israel into existence, terrorising the indigenous people into fleeing from their homes.  The Deir Yassin massacre was typical of the outrages committed against the  Palestinian people.  The ferocity of the Jewish terrorists was not limited to murdering Palestinians, as even the British who had promised a country which didn't belong to them, were slaughtered in the King David Hotel.  One cannot really feel sorry for the deaths of the British military who had no business in Palestine anyway, but the outrages against the native people were as inexcusable as the inaction of the West which was tantamount to approval of the anti-human crimes.

In 1967, the beleaguered Palestinians were subjected to further brutality by the Zionist entity with the invasion of the last parts of their nation which were annexed to expand the Jewish state beyond the frontiers which the B'nai Brit-ish despots had given them.  The West Bank is known to Zionists as Judæa and Samaria, and the occupation is seen as a liberation of Jewish land from non-Jews.  The treatment of the indigenous population as sub-humans is pure Talmudism, no matter what the hypocritical anti-Zionist yet Talmud-adherent Rabbis may say.  The daily deprivation, humiliation and persecution of the Palestinian people extends beyond the use of internal passports, the demolition of property and the army brutality.  The so-called Separation Wall is a constant reminder of the Zionist mentality.  The Wall is not a border, but a temporary device to keep the Jewish state pure; it will be moved further into Goy lands as the Jewish imperialists encroach on more land which they have no right to.

There is a poem by Martin Niemöller which is often repeated by Holocaust-believers to inculcate shame and guilt in the minds of ordinary Europeans who were in any case in no way to blame for Jews being gassed in the Holocaust, as indeed no one was, since there were no Gas Chambers it didn't happen!  The poem in English states:

'When the Nazis came for the Communists I remained silent.  I wasn't a Communist.  When they came for the incurably sick I remained silent.  I wasn't incurably sick' [when they came for the Trades Unionists, Social Democrats, Jews etc etc]...'When they came for me, there was no one to speak out'

This propaganda piece has been used to extend the stranglehold of the money power and to justify the persecution of the Palestinians.  There are people who argue that the Palestinian struggle is no concern of anyone outside the region.  This is simply not so.  They came for Africa, whose people they enslaved and sold as animals, then they came for Europe and the European daughter nations which they poisoned with Bolshevism, Political Correctness and usury; they came for Christianity with the anti-Christian Vatican II and the heresy of Judæo-Christianity (Talmudism for Goyim), they came for Islam with the Wahhabi heresy; now they are coming for the entire world.  Palestine is a testing ground for Zionism, just as the North of Ireland has been a testing ground for the British terrorist state.  The struggle for Palestine is a key part of the struggle for freedom worldwide.

The færy tale story that the current inhabitants of Israel have a right to be there because their ancestors were there 2000 years ago is built on chutzpah.  The overwhelming majority of Israelis are descendants of the Turkic Khazars, and have no claim to the land of Palestine.  If they have a land to return to, it is located in the Caucasus straddling the fringes of Europe and Asia.  Palestine never belonged to them. 

It is an outrage that the Jewish policy of mixing peoples from every corner of the globe is negated when it suits them.  Europe was a land exclusively for Europeans within the living memory of some of our people.  By Jewish logic, it should forever be our land by right of our connection to the soil.  This I fully agree with, and so it is with Palestine; it has always been the home of the Palestinians, and always should be.  Let the Israelis vacate from Palestine, and from every nation.  Let us build a free world where everyone lives in his own homeland, with his own people, in purely exclusive and peacefully coexisting natural nations.

Where does this leave the Israelis?  Well, they can either return to Khazaria, or move to Birobidjan, but in either case, they must leave Palestine.  Imperialism and genocide are unacceptable regardless of who is the perpetrator.  This goes for the occupiers of Palestine as much as it goes for the now thankfully dead 'British' Empire.

The Talmudists have attacked us one people at a time, using our own greed and selfishness against us.  On this International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, let us stand united against the common enemy.  No to Israel, no to their finance-imperialism and no to their plans for global domination.  No to Internationalism and Imperialism.  Yes to a world of strong and socially-just Free Nations.  There is a place for a Jewish state in the Free World, but that isn't Palestine.

For more informative videos, visit the Never Before Campaign's youtube channel

Can Jews be allies in the fight against Internationalism?

The world is being pushed towards rule by a single global authority.  Many of the powers behind that drive are known as Jews by race or religion, and the undeniable association of internationalism and organised Jewry is such that it can appear that internationalism is a Jewish disease. 

Due to the disproportionate presence of Jews in the upper echelons of the internationalist cabal, it is tempting to consider that perhaps it is an inherent trait of those who we know as Jews, to fight against what most people consider to be wholesome and natural.  But is this true?  What of the Jewish activists who oppose the international agenda?  Are they to be side-lined and treated with enmity because of the leaders their people?

The Jewish question has never been a simple issue.  A central tenet of Judaism is a belief that only the Jews are humans, and that all non-Jews are base animals.  With this in mind, it becomes clear why adherents of the Jewish religion are fervently internationalist.  How could they be otherwise when they are taught that their God has chosen them to rule over the entire Earth, and that the multitude of featherless bipeds which walk the lands, were created with only one purpose; to serve the Chosen people?  Judaism does not recognise any nation except the Jewish one; and it has no frontiers.  Certainly there is the curious nation of Israel, but in real terms that is a centre of operations for the global Jewish state, not a nation as non-Jews would see it.

The internationalist attitude of Judaism makes the Jews themselves a suspect people.  The expressions of superiority and of perpetual victimhood only increase the antipathy which some Jews incite.  The constant blathering about the 'holocaust', (even to the point of the mandatory teaching of the non-event to school children), and the legal prohibition in some countries of pointing out contradictions and absurdities in the færy tale, may have cowed some people into submission to Jewish rule, but for others has become a rallying point for the anti-internationalist Resistance.  The insistence in elevating the holocaust over the Holomor and the Palestinian genocide is further sickening chutzpah which irks the informed mind.

Against the background of the economic and moral blackmail of the holocaust industry, the crimes of the Jewish state, and the tyranny of international finance, (in its capitalist as well as communist guises), is it surprising that Jews are not trusted?  Focusing blame for the evils of the so-called Jews solely on the Khazars, does not take into account the Edomites who took the Talmudic faith to their lands.  The Synagogue of Satan predates the Khazar conversion, and we do ourselves no favours by ignoring this fact.  It isn't anti-Jewish to fear a people who have a proven track-record of deceit and tyranny, spanning over two millennia; it is a matter of common sense and self-defence.

In the alternative research community, or truth movement, (or any other label which opposition to the Establishment is given), there are activists from every culture.  It makes perfect sense for European nationalists to co-operate with African nationalists, or even for anti-internationalist Libertarians to rub shoulders with Social Distributists (at least so far as fighting multi-national corporations goes.)  The resistance to the internationalist Establishment does not have to be unified in terms of organisation; in fact is is more advantageous to the struggle that we work as individuals, coming together on single issues when necessary, but ultimately remaining independent on one another.  By keeping free of rigid groupings we reduce the risk of falling prey to infiltrators and agents provocateur.

The leaderless structure has allowed for individuals to spread information without having to obey the orders of people higher up the chain.  This strength has brought with it a new issue - that of the shills of the Establishment who wear the ideological clothes of the resistence, but push the agenda of the Establishment.  One need only think of Alex Jones, Jordan Maxwell and Michael Moore.  

Alex Jones is an infamous shill.  He has built himself up as a leader in the 'Truth Movement', but he keeps all attention away from Israel and the Zionist criminal network.  For details of the absurd drivel he has pushed on an awakening public, visit http://alexjonesisazionistshill.blogspot.com. 

A colleague of Alex Jones, Jordan Maxwell goes beyond ignoring the crimes of the self-Chosen people, and actually slanders Europeans (see this video).  Whereas Jones steers clear of the Zionist issue, Maxwell actively pushes their propaganda, blaming Europeans for the ills of the world.  Maxwell is Jewish, and Jones' wife and children are Jewish.  This link to the architects of Zionism reinforces the notion that Jews per se cannot be trusted.  When one adds the millionaire liberal agitator, Michael Moore, into the equation, it becomes very easy to understand hostility to the crypto-Jews in our midst.

As well as people who hide their connections to Judaism, there are openly Jewish people who purport to be fighting the common enemy.  Theses fit into two categories: anti-Zionist but still religious Jews; ethnic Jews who have abandoned the Judaic religion.  These two groups must be treated separately.

What are we to make of anti-Zionists who still follow the Talmud?  An example of the Talmud-followers who oppose Israel is Neturei Karta.  Whilst their defence of Palestine is laudable, the reasoning behind their opposition to the modern State of Israel stems from a belief in the coming of the Mashiach (the Jewish Messiah) to usher in a single global kingdom in which the Jews will rule over the rest of humanity.  The establishment of Jerusalem as the capital of the world will signal the return to Israel, thus, so the logic goes, the current Eretz Yisrael is a mockery of prophecy, coming as it does before the reign of Mashiach.  Far from opposing the internationalists, the anti-Zionist Talmudists oppose the 'New' World Order as a threat to their prophesied Jew World Order, which will fulfill their God's promise to create an ever-lasting global slave plantation, where just as with the African Slave Trade, they will be the owners and masters.

There are Jews such as the Karaites, who reject the Talmud and instead observe only the written Torah.  Karaites uphold the teachings of the First Covenant in which they claim that their God bestowed upon them the status of the Chosen People.  It is said that the original mission of the Jews was to educate and aid humanity as a whole.  This seemingly reasonable mission is based on a belief in the inherent supremacy of the self-Chosen, which places all non-Jews in the position of ignorant and feeble children who need to be helped by their betters.  That doesn't sound reasonable to me; in fact it is quite insulting. 

There is a sub-division of Karaites known as the Karaim who are ethnic Khazars who have progressed beyond the confines of the Torah, into accepting Jesus and Mohammed as prophets.  The Karaim underscore the Jewish roots of Mohammedan Islam; this raises more questions than it answers, bringing into question the entire essence and purpose of the Mohammedan faith - but that is an issue which must be explored elsewhere.  As a rule of thumb, all religious Jews (that is practitioners of the Judaic faith) should be viewed as a part of the problem, and not even considered as comrades in the united struggle for freedom.  That includes the Talmudic poster boy of the populists in the UK, Rabbi Mayer Schiller.

There are ethnic Jews who have abandoned the supremacist creed of their forebears, and now contribute to the fight against the internationalist menace.  Prominent activists include Nathanael Kapner, Gilad Atzmon, Henry Makow and Israel Shahak.  Each of the aforementioned activists has a different focus, as one would expect of any researcher.  

The existence of free-thinking Jewish activists is a source of controversy.  The phenomenon of Jewish infiltration in traditionalist circles is well documented.  This has created an air of suspicion amongst Gentiles who have come to expect deception from people who call themselves Jews; but even moreso from those who are Jews but deny it.  This suspicion may be natural and justified, but is it healthy?

The Zionist-apologist, Jordan Maxwell, who infamously claimed that White people (non-Jewish Europeans) are the source of all evil, has a cult-like following.  To these people, it is pointless to point out that whilst some White people are vermin, that in no way justifies libelling us all.  Focussing in on the British as an example, it is entirely reasonable to attack the British Royal Family, the entire political and financial Establishment, and the uniformed butchers in the military serving in the US-UK-Israeli wars of conquest; it is not reasonable to slate the entire British nation for the crimes of our leaders.

To an ordinary Briton, the realisation that our nation is controlled by sewer-quality scum, who have invited the hatred of the world, is hard to accept.  For all people, there is an ethnocentric desire to take pride in the achievements of the nation.  For the British, the Empire was a source of pride.  For some modern-day imperialists, the Empire is still viewed with nostalgia.  One need only think of the utter nonsense penned by a leader of a patriotic organisation only last year, in which he waxed lyrical about taking pride in seeing the map of the world coloured in British Empire Red, notably 'from Cairo to the Cape'.  This same author who has written and spoken extensively about non-White immigration into the British Isles, see the Empire through rose-tinted glasses; failing to appreciate that without the crimes of imperialism, the home nations would not have been smashed and the indigenous peoples forced to seek new lives elsewhere.  Ethnocentrism is natural, but when it leads to a defensive attitude which refuses to see the flaws in the nation, it becomes dangerous.

For Jewish activists, the upbringing in an atmosphere of not only being racially superior according to political and economic theorists, but due to being a race Chosen by none less than God, must be hard to overcome.  For some Gentiles, anything less than an absolute condemnation of all Jews (family included), indicates that the activist is a shill and is covering for his people.  This level of animosity bolsters the stranglehold of the despotic leaders of Organised Jewry.  

The best friend of the Jewish-Rabbinical-Zionist extremist, is the rabid 'anti-Semite' who can see nothing but evil in the Jewish people.  The only hope for humanity is for the internationalist menace to be undermined, exposed and eradicated.  Refusing to cooperate with ethnic Jews who may be sincere in their opposition to Organised Jewry, helps no-one.

Israel Shahak has written profusely about the insanity of the Jewish religion.  According to anti-Jewish extremists, we should not endorse or even read his work, as he is an ethnic Jew, and worse, an Israeli citizen.  He is a brave man who has taken on the religious Establishment of his nation and country, and should be applauded for his work.  Nathanael Kapner is an interesting character, who has embraced Christianity with the zeal which can only be found in a convert.  His eccentric style may not appeal to most people, but the information he shares with us 'Goyim' is worthy of study.  

Henry Makow focuses upon the Sabbatean and Frankist cults, but not Judaism as a whole, due to an innate affinity with his own people; Gilad Atzmon fights Zionism, but cannot shake the internationalist ethos which he now embraces in the form of humanism.  Are we to see these activists as shills because they will not attack their own kind?  Or are we to take a step back and accept that the Jewish ethnicity of these men is bound to have an impact upon their work, and consider their contribution with this bias taken fully into consideration?

We are faced with a menace which if allowed to continue, could well destroy our world.  There are shills and infiltrators in every race, but also good people who understand the lunacy of internationalism and the importance of every nation maintaining its cultural and ethnic integrity and sovereignty, for the mutual benefit of all.  

Dealing with members of the tribe responsible for the financial system which has created mass migration, materialism, and cultural death, may be abhorrent to some, but to reject people who have experience of the machinations and mentality of the self-Chosen and who are willing to collaborate in the fight against the destruction of nations and cultures, is to reject vital arms in the struggle.

We must remain vigilant when dealing with everyone who takes a stand against the common enemy.  Within the British patriotic movement there are a significant number of paid informers, infiltrators and even undercover Police; worse is the fact that some of the activists are Monarchy-worshipping imperialists who espouse pro-Freemasonic and anti-Irish policies which are treason against the European people.  This doesn't mean that the British should be written off as a people.  

Ethnic Jews who have rejected the supremacist faith of the Synagogue and sincerely wish to be free from the internationalist curse their ancestors were born into, should not be forced back into the waiting arms of the Rabbis and Zionists.  There must be many Jews who can see that the teachings of their elders are lies.  They are more likely to take the steps necessary to free themselves if they can see that others have done so and that the non-Jewish world will not automatically repel them.  If the Jewish people can be freed from the insane and self-destructive Jewish faith, the backbone of internationalism can be broken.

Restoring freedom isn't easy.  We have difficult choices to make.  Let us not limit our options and thereby aid our enemies.  We must expose shills whenever we find them, but we must not write off anyone who could be a valuable asset in our fight.  If we aren't willing to examine reality from every angle, we have no chance of escaping the web which we have unwittingly further entangled ourselves in.

Civil Service Training - Brainwashing to turn people into robots.

I used to be a Civil Servant.  I worked in various departments, and had connections with many more; the Civil Service may be split into different departments, but it really is quite monolithic.  All Civil Servants ultimately are State Servants, answering to the Government and the Establishment which controls the Government.  All Civil Servants have to undergo mandatory political indoctrination, although it is not referred to in that way.  All Civil Servants are taught to obey the orders from above, and to never express any opinions, except the officially sanctioned ones.  Although they are called Civil Servants, their job is not to serve the People, but to serve the Establishment.  A better title would be the anti-Civil Service.

For years, I have seen first hand the manner in which decent people are drained of their humanity by the rules and regulations which govern every aspect of Civil Service work.  The Surveillance State which is becoming ever more pervasive, has been in existence for Government workers for far longer than the general public will be aware.  The CCTV which covers the UK in a blanket of paranoia was tested out by the Establishment on the army of government workers.  The erosion of privacy which the people have accepted with barely a whimper, has long been the modus vivendi for the public sector.  As loathed as it is by the workers, the military structure has made disobedience to the tyranny of the higher ranks, a fast track to termination of employment.

The visible cameras and the petty monitoring of every movement serve to undermine the natural confidence of the individual.  Ludicrous policing of the minutiæ of daily routine, down to the timing of toilet breaks, may irk the workers, but it is the dehumanisation in the routine meetings and in mandatory training which serves to break the spirit of the individuals, and render them as mere cogs in the machine.

Staff meetings in the Civil Service exist to alert the workers to the latest change in government policy.  The initial interest of new staff members in keeping up-to-date with central government diktat, soon gives way to the sense of futility, as the realisation sets-in that the weekly directives serve no purpose other than to massage the fraudulently manufactured statistics which government use to justify the extravagant use of tax-payers' money, and their constant meddling in the lives of the people.  The reduction of human beings to numbers, completely disempowers the individual and instills a sense that the chosen career is pointless in terms of anything other than purely material gain.  Those who have no problem with this, rise to the highest positions; people with a strong moral desire to help their fellow man, find this desire is incompatible with the purely material and mechanistic Establishment, and either continue in misery, or leave.

The foulest mechanism for breaking the spirit of the Civil Servant is mandatory training and yearly appraisals.  Training and evaluation are inextricably linked; each being as pointless as the other.  The appraisals are used to gauge the success of the trainers at beating the individuality out of the workers, and the training programmes are adjusted to crush any remnant of decency which survives intact.

To illustrate the mendacity of Civil Service training, I will describe some of the incidents I have been subjected to.  One example is the injection of political correctness into training to deal with face-to-face hostility.  During the scripted banter which the trainers-cum-actors presented, the gathered staff were told that the best way to diffuse a potentially dangerous situation is to use positive body-language, a calming tone of voice and reassuring words.  The positive body language includes showing the palms of one's hands to subconsciously reassure the angry individual that he is in no danger by letting him know that one is unarmed.  (Of course the nonsensical use of the word 'they' in the singular was employed throughout!)  Of absolutely no relevance, the issue of saluting was introduced and it was explained that the modern placing of the hand to the eye-level stems from the days of the Knights who wore metal helmets, and would raise their visors to enable eye-contact and thus to show trust.  

Why mention saluting at all when speaking of strategies for dealing with conflict?  Are we to believe that an irate member of the public will be calmed by a Civil Servant saluting?  The point of the digression was to allow the trainer to bring into his routine, mention of the Roman Salute, which he  misnamed as the Nazi salute, and went on to declare to be an expression of pure evil which could not but strike fear into the hearts of anyone who saw it.  The Roman Salute is an open-palmed greeting which shews that the individual is unarmed; it is a greeting which leaves the body exposed and at risk; it is a sign of trust and has been used for millenia before the Nazi Party came into existence.  Oddly, the Masonic-Zionist clenched-fist salute, was not mentioned.  On one occasion I questioned the trainer as to why he insisted on slandering the traditional European greeting, but  would not mention the obviously violent clenched fist salute.  His response was to state that training was no place for politics!

Nearly all civil Servants are expected to undertake self-defence training.  One would think that self-defence could not be politically-doctored, but alike with every aspect of the Civil Service, it too is tailored to instill the agenda of the Establishment.  In the UK it is legal to use appropriate force when defending oneself from an attacker.  All that matters is that the attacker is moving towards one, and that one feels afraid.  So far so good.  During training, one would expect that any examples of individual victims overcoming their assailants and successfully beating attempts to prosecute them for assault, would surely have featured all manner of victims and all manner of assailants, but in true hypocritical Establishment manner, all the criminals were white men, and the victims non-Whites or homosexuals, singled out by racists and homophobes.  Following on from the bizarre, irrelevant and incorrect reference to the Roman salute, a pattern could clearly be seen.

During routine training to improve interaction with the public, we were forced to take politically incorrect words and place them on a chart made of a three-part Venn diagram.  Completely acceptable words were to placed in the left circle, completely unacceptable ones in the right, and words which varied according to situation, in the overlap; the words were such as Gypsy, Paki, Gay.  Trainees tended to be grouped according to rank, so it was unusual for higher ranks to be in the same sessions as their subordinates.  The above training was conspicuous by the presence of higher level officers, whose presence was obviously to add to the humiliation of the lower ranked Civil Servants.  The training was an exercise in political control, with the desired result for all the given words to be placed in the forbidden section.  Not only had they to be placed, but each individual had to stand and explain his or her choice.  

It was truly cringe-worthy to see my colleagues sheepishly play the game, and degrade themselves by simperingly repeating the politically correct dogma.  Some of the staff were visibly shaking under the scrutiny of the higher ranks.  I managed to dodge this particular training module for years, but eventually I found myself out of excuses; this cost me my job because I found myself unable to grovel to appease my so-called superiors.  I placed all my words in the acceptable section and explained that as the sticks and stones song says 'words can never hurt me' and people should grow up and stop behaving like spoilt children crying over name-calling.  The look of shock on my colleagues faces was matched by the alarm of the higher officers.  After the session, my colleagues told me that they agreed with what I had said, but were too scared of the repercussions if they had stood up to the bullying tactics of the Establishment. 

The only way to survive inside the Civil Service  is to accept that one is powerless and that nothing makes sense.  The tedious meetings, the ridiculous training courses which are repeated in exactly the same format (to the point where it would be possible to speak every word in the way that Monty Python fans do with the films they learn by heart), the total surveillance, the dehumanisation of the staff and the corresponding reduction of the general public to anonymous statistics; all these factors make the Civil Service an organisation of miserable souls who are crying out for a sweeping out of the leadership.

Aside from the few who join the Civil Service for money, the majority are motivated by a genuine desire to help their people.  I am still in contact with some of my former colleagues.  Since I left the Service, the top-down control has become even more tyrannical.  More people have been forced out, or simply sacked, and the division between the compassionate but stifled many, and the selfish robotic few has deepened.

The Establishment fail to appreciate humanity.  They do not see people, only commodities, consumers and producers.  This arrogance and egocentrism is the undoing of our rulers.  The Civil Service is staffed with an army of unhappy workers who would relish the opportunity to break free from the chains of political correctness, and to use their many skills to help the people, rather than the financial parasites, as at present.  It sometimes seems that our task is unrealistic; that the Establishment is too powerful to overthrow.  However, the Establishment needs us in order for it to function.  Like a house of cards, it stays in place because people believe the illusion that it cannot fall.  It can, and it will.  

The brain-washing techniques are failing, and in their place outright despotism is manifesting.  Overt dictatorships are bound to fail because they incite their own opposition.  When the tyrants of London are swept aside, the very Civil Service which they have used to subjugate the people, will be in place to overturn their evil and rebuild our battered country as a land which is built on true social justice, and genuine national freedom. Their pedestal is teetering; let us smash it to the ground.

Talmud: The mother of Marxism, Zionism, and International Finance Imperialism

The following places share one thing in common; on the dates which accompany them, they freed themselves from the usurious peril which had been sucking their economic life-blood, and which had been committing heinous atrocities against the host population:

   70  Judæa

 250   Carthage

 415   Alexandria

 554   Diocese of Clermont

 561   Diocese of Uzès

 612   Visigoth Spain

 642   Visigoth Empire

 855   Italy

 876   Sens

1012   Mainz

1182   France

1182   Germany

1276   Oberbayern

1290   England

1306   France

1322   France

1348   Switzerland

1349   Heilbronn

1349   Saxony

1349   Hungary

1360   Hungary

1370   Spanish Netherlands

1380   Slovakia

1388   Strasburg

1394   Germany

1394   France

1420   Lyons

1421   Austria

1424   Freiburg

1424   Zurich

1424   Cologne

1432   Savoy

1438   Mainz

1439   Augsburg

1442   Netherlands

1444   Netherlands

1446   Bayern

1453   France

1453   Breslau

1454   Wurzburg

1462   Mainz

1483   Mainz

1484   Warsaw

1485   Vincenza

1492   Spain

1492   Italy

1495   Lithuania

1496   Naples

1496   Portugal

1498   Nürnberg

1498   Navarre

1510   Brandenberg

1510   Prussia

1514   Strasburg

1515   Genoa

1519   Regensburg

1533   Naples

1541   Naples

1542   Prague

1550   Genoa

1551   Bayern

1555   Pesaro

1557   Prague

1559   Austria

1561   Prague

1567   Würzburg

1569   Papal States

1571   Brandenburg

1582   Netherlands

1582   Hungary

1593   Brandenburg

1597   Cremona, Pavia, Lodi

1614   Frankfurt

1615   Worms

1619   Kiev

1648   Ukraine

1648   Poland

1649   Hamburg

1654   Belarus

1656   Lithuania

1669   Oran (North Africa)

1669   Vienna

1670   Vienna

1712   Sandomir

1727   Russia

1738   Württemberg

1740   Belarus

1744   Prague, Bohemia

1744   Slovakia

1744   Livonia

1745   Moravia

1753   Kovad (Lithuania)

1761   Bordeaux

1772   Deported to the Pale of Settlement

1775   Warsaw

1789    Alsace

1804    Villages in Russia

1808    Rural Russia

1815    Bremen

1815    Franconia, Swabia, Bayern

1820    Bremen

1843    Russian Border, Austria, Prussia

1862    U.S. areas under General Grant's jurisdiction

1866    Galatz, Romania

1880s   Russia

1891     Moscow

1919     Bayern (only foreign born Jews)

1940s   Europe (except Zionist-controlled areas)

20??     Palestine?

The places listed are by no means exhaustive, and the times refer only to events which have happened since the time of Christ.  The expulsions of the Synagogue of Satan are recorded (albeit numerically exaggerated) in the Talmud and Old Testament.  A similar list covering the period Before Christ could be compiled if so desired.

The professional Talmudic whiners cite the expulsions of those who follow the evil faith from which Marxism and Zionism sprang, as proof of the inherent cruelty of the Goyim.  There is no other people in all of history who have been subjected to expulsion from every land they have graced with their presence.  Could it be that it isn't humanity which is at fault for the universal animosity felt towards the people who call themselves Jews, but in fact the followers of the Talmud themselves?

Listing the facts about the expulsions of the Jews invites the accusation of anti-Semitism.  This is nonsense.  Even if the label Semite could be used to describe those who are known as the Jews (which in most cases it cannot), the expulsions have had absolutely nothing to do with race, but with ideology.

The reason for the universal animosity the host nations have felt towards the 'Jews' is a direct consequence of the superiority complex which is instilled in them by their leaders.  Being taught in the Synagogue that they are a special people, chosen by none other than God Himself, would perhaps be nothing more than a harmless eccentricity, were it not for the corollary that their God had chosen them to rule over all other forms of life; other humans being nothing of the sort, but rather being lowly cattle, fit only to serve and be used.

From the perverted and sick faith of their leaders came the Oral Torah, which was eventually written down as what we today call the Talmud.  The supremacist ideology of the Talmud reduces all non-believers to the status of non-human and soul-less commodities.  As commodities, the Goyim are to be bled dry financially, in order to materially enrich the chosen ones; this is the basis of usury and the entire banking system.  As well as being bled dry in a monetary sense, the Talmud also incites its adherents to commit ritual sacrifice to appease their God.  The Zohar refines the supremacist ideology of the Talmud to the point where the Goyim are less than worthless in the eyes of the inner elite.  This arrogance alone hasn't caused the expulsion; putting these views into practice has achieved that.

The Talmudic faith has not remained within the Synagogues where it could do no real harm; its followers have taken their supremacist lunacy into the world outside.  The political ideology of Zionism is not a new phenomenon.  The term is relatively modern, but the dogma is as old as the religion from which it sprang.  Zionism is the political expression of the Talmud.  The Talmudic faith dictates that the Chosen are the only real humans and that all others must worship them.  The current drive towards a single global authority is Talmudism in practice.  The social aspects of the faith have become known as Marxism.  Talmudism is Zionism is Marxism.

There are those who would argue that it is obsessive to focus upon the Talmud as the core of our problems.  It is not.  To step back from the Talmud and all of its permutations is to withdraw from the battle.  There are cults which have taken the Talmudic message and developed it, such as the Sabbateans/Frankists.  There is a temptation to focus on these cults and ignore their Talmudic root, but that is to excuse the latter for the crimes of the former.  We are encouraged to look at the branches of the disease but not at the roots.  It is fine to attack Cultural Marxism, International Finance, the Rothschilds, Sabbatai Zvi, Kabbalah, Illuminated Freemasonry, the infiltrated anti-Christian Vatican II, and any of the other outgrowths of the core issue, but to do so without an eye on the real power behind these developments, is to lose the battle.  We certainly need to fight the enemy in all its forms, but slashing away at the web only allows the spider to spin more threads and to outflank us.  We need to isolate the spider.

The list of localities which have awoken to the Talmudic scourge and removed those who follow this evil creed, should be seen in its true light, not as a list of irrational anti-Semites (as the Talmudists would have it) but as an inspiration and a beacon of hope.

In every nation, people have awakened and said no to the supremacist bigots and their Synagogue-going brethren.  This is a cause for celebration in itself, but the most important factor regarding the rejection of the usurers, is the ability of the rulers to overcome their greed and selfishness.  The rulers of today are more than happy to betray their people so long as they are handsomely paid in terms of ego-massaging power and material gain.  Generations before us also fell prey to the trinkets and the illusion of power which the usurers gave them in return for their obediance and turning blind eyes towards their crimes.  The many examples of people trading-in false riches for the true richness which comes with freedom, and self-determination, are proof that we have overcome similar woes in the past, and we will overcome them again.  Their control of the media allows them to create the fantasy that their order is unstoppable; but once one realises that this fantasy is built on the same tissue of lies as all their power, a restoration of our authority suddenly looks much more achievable.

We need to stop swallowing their propaganda and exile their ideology from our lands once and for all.  Israel is not their land, and never has been.  The nation of Birobidjan is where those who insist on following the Talmud must live.  Let them go and indulge themselves in their delusions of grandeur, until hopefully they will shake this superstitious poison and become fit to once again rejoin humanity as equals.  That may take generations, and for some, that day may never come.  For the sake of all of humanity, it is time to identify the spider, and by so doing to halt its tyranny.  This doesn't mean falling for the trap of attacking the Jewish people as a whole, and thereby bolstering their reliance on their leaders, but by exposing the leadership and in so doing helping the decent Jews to break free from the despots who have manipulated them as well as everyone else.

If we do nothing, (all of us, Jews included) the next step in the drive to global dominance by the inner elite who control the internationalist web, could well result in global annihilation.  The major difference between the usurping of authority in ages past, and now, is that for the first time in recorded history, our enemies have access to weaponry which could be used to devastate our entire world, and moreso they have access to facilities which would allow them to survive whilst all others are erased from the Earth.  Possessing a mentality which inculcates a belief that they are the only humans and that killing and hurting the rest of us is as akin to crushing a flea; these people wouldn't think twice about destroying us all. Is it worth risking that just to fit in with polite society, to hold onto irelevant material gains and to avoid being labelled as an anti-Semite?

How do we achieve the over-turning of Talmudic rule?  The strength of the Talmudic power is its ability to manipulate the greed of the Goyim.  We need to break free from the grip of the materialists, and build our own communities in such a way that the Talmudic influence cannot gain control.  We also need to have the strength to speak the truth.  The Israeli treatment of the Palestinians in Gaza, and the loathsome way in which self-appointed Talmudic spokesmen dictate how we should think, feel and talk, have helped to open the eyes of the people to the reality of Talmudic oppression.  They have once again overplayed the persecution sob story and have shewn themselves in their true light.  Talmudic chutzpah will be their own undoing.

It is easy to become despondent and to believe that we are powerless.  We are not.  The Establishment rely on us feeling that we can do nothing; for once we take responsibility for our own lives, we regain our own authority.  We need a change of attitude.  We need to side-step those who would keep us down-trodden. The Talmudists have shewn us how easily bought our corrupt leaders are.  Let us expose this corruption and make support for the Talmudists untenable.  We can break our corrupt leaders by focussing on their own vanity; let us make the Talmudic option a non-option.  If our ancesters could defeat the Talmudic menace, then so can we.

11.11.11. Remembrance Day: A Festival of Lies

Today is the 11th November 2011.  On this day in 1918, the Great War finally ended with the signing of the Armistice at 11am.  The War had been won by Germany in 1917, but the Zionist Establishment in London had used their influence to extend the War for nearly two more years.  Millions more men died as a result of the extension of the War.  The German proposal to end the conflict with a return to pre-war conditions was abandoned, and instead, the European mainland was torn apart.  Such were the cruel and unacceptable conditions placed upon Germany and his allies, that a future continuation of the conflict to correct the wrongs of the Armistice, was inevitable.

Why did the Great War continue from early 1917 to late 1918?  Why were lives wasted and nations devastated, when the end of hostilities was complete save the official declarations?  What was so important that it had to be achieved at the cost of forever denying the people of Europe a return to the civilised conditions of the pre-war years?  Why did the Government of the USA send the nation's finest to die in the European war after promising her people she would stay neutral?  Why?  In a word; Zion.

The Zionist Establishment in London promised the US regime that in return for men to die in the trenches, London would give Palestine to the Jews.  Just re-read that last sentence.  Yes, the London regime promised a foreign nation that it would give something which it didn't own, to a third party, in return for prolonging the carnage of the European people, in which the American people would be used as cannon fodder.  The logic of Britain giving Palestine to the Jews is akin to Singapore promising to give Wales to the Eskimos.   The British Mandate was built on imperialistic pretensions and had no value in reality.  However, once the Zionist and Talmudist Government Minister and Goyim-hater, James Balfour, had issued the infamous Declaration, the fate of the Palestinians was sealed.  On this Remembrance Day we remember the Palestinians murdered for the Khazar state, and the European, ANZAC and American men whose sense of patriotic duty was betrayed, and whose blood was ritually spilt to guarantee the creation of the abomination we call Israel.

In addition to giving the Palestinian land to the false-Jews, the Zionist Establishment fomented Bolshevism in Russia,.  After cynically giving the European patriots promises of support to keep the Communist terror at bay, the Talmudists in London reneged on their promises and installed their Talmudic friends as the new rulers of Russia and her satellites.  The death toll of patriotic Russians fighting the red horde was staggering; but it was as nothing in comparison with the death-toll after the Khazar victory.

Mass murderer and Communist poster-boy, Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Trotsky) was rushed from New York to join his fellow Talmudists to oversee the butchery of Russia.  The Russian Revolution was a Talmudic anti-Russian takeover, financed by Wall Street and the City of London.  The Masons and Monarchists who have been displaying fake emotions at the cenotaph today, are part of the same cabal which sent Europeans to die in war, so that the Talmudists could murder over 100 million more of the Goyim during the latter half of the twentieth century. On this Remembrance Day we remember the Russian patriots betrayed by the Zionists in London, and murdered by the Talmudists who had slithered into the great European nation which forms our eastern frontier.

Today, the hypocrites in Government, and the Parasites-in-Chief of the Windsor mafia, have been parading through London, looking solemn and speaking of the heroism of the men and women who have died thanks to being ordered to fight in wars for the Establishment.  The 'heroes' of the military had no choice but to fight and obey the obscene orders of their officers.  In the Great War, patriots of every nation joined up en masse due to believing the romantic lies pushed by the controlled media of the Establishment.  When the finest of Europe had been killed, conscription was introduced to force people to fight.  Those who refused to kill for international Zionism, were shot by their officers.  On this Remembrance Day we remember the brave men who refused to obey the insane orders of the Talmudists who rule the UK.

The Second World War was another tragedy for Europe, and the war which saw the most outrageous defamation of the European people.  Regurgitating an old Jewish yarn about 6 million of the Self-Chosen being dispatched by the unworthy animals they lived amongst, the Syngogue of Satan invented the utter claptrap which school children are taught to refer to as the Holocaust.  At least in the 1945 version of the Jewish fable, there were over 6 million Jews on the planet!  The brain dead propaganda was used to justify the theft of Palestine in toto; making the Balfour Declaration a reality.  Europeans died in vain, just to create a state for our eternal enemy, and to alienate our traditional Arab friends.  On this Remembrance Day we remember the lies of the Holyhoax, and pledge to expose them, and to hell with the legislation forbidding discussion of the Talmudic lie.

The embarrassing buffoons of the English Defence League were out in force today in London, threatening anti-Capitalists at the Occupy the Stock Exchange demonstration.  The EDL are the bootboys of the Talmudic state, but imbecilic as they are, even they managed to make the connection between Zionism and Capitalism.  Their loyalty to Israel overstepped the Establishment's requirements today, and so they were arrested and treated as the naughty Goyim they so wish to be.  On this Remembrance Day we remember the victims of the British education and media system, who think patriotism means servility and blind obedience to Israel.

Remember the fallen.  Remember why they fell.  Remember the people who profited by their deaths, and who are still profiting in new conflicts to further the power of the Khazars.  Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya, Serbia...and soon Iran, Syria and Pakistan: are we going to stay silent out of respect for the men who were tricked into joining an army which pledged to defend the nation, yet has been used to betray us at every step?  Are we to prattle on about honouring the heroes, yet dis-honour them by allowing those who caused their deaths to go unpunished.  On this Remembrance Day we remember the Fallen, the civilians being slain as I type, and the plans to create a third World War to reduce the Goyim to the servants of Mammon once and for all.

On this Remembrance Day we remember the betrayals of all our people, and pledge to make our opposition heard.  No more wars for finance, for imperialism, and for Zion.  Never Forgive.  Never Forget.

Bonfire Night. Remembering Guy Fawkes, the hero.

Tonight in England, the skies are filled with smoke as we celebrate Bonfire Night.  In spite of the constant Establishment talk of man-made Global Warming, and the need to cut down on all CO2 emissions, the 5th November is exempt from the draconian legislation which makes nigh on every human activity in the  UK illegal.  Bonfire Night is special to the Establishment.  Why is that?

Bonfire Night commemorates the unsuccessful plot to overthrow the despots in London.  On the 5th November, 1605, a group of patriots, led by Robert Catesby, attempted to detonate bombs under the English Parliament, whilst the monarchy and their political stooges were in the building.  They were forced into such drastic action by the despotism of the Establishment.  As successor to the vile Elizabeth Tudor, James Stuart was greeted as the man to lead England out of the sectarian mire that his anti-Catholic predecessor had created.  He turned out to be even more tyrannical than Elizabeth, and out of desperation, it was decided that he had to be killed.

Out of loyalty, one of the heroic revolutionaries had sent a letter to a friend, warning him not to be in Parliament on the 5th November.  This friendship was betrayed, and the army were sent after the would-be saviours of England.  The explosives expert, Guido 'Guy' Fawkes was caught in the cellars underneath Parliament.  He was brutally tortured to extract information which would lead to the arrest of those he had worked with.  In March 1607, the revolutionaries who survived the torture of the sadistic English Establishment, were murdered by being hanged until nearly dead, then sliced open (drawn) and disemboweled whilst still alive (quartered).  This particularly cruel murder was held in public to deter any other revolutionaries who may have attempted to avenge the martyrs and end the persecution of the common people.

To mark the attempted destruction of Parliament, it was declared that on the anniversary of the failed plot, bonfires should be lit and celebrations held.  The tradition continues, with many bonfires still having a ritual burning of Guy Fawkes.  It has also become customary for extravagant firework displays to accompany the bonfires, and in some places for historical re-enactments of the death march of Guy Fawkes and his fellow plotters.  Every town and village in England has its own display.  Tonight, the country will be visible from space as it is lit up by fire and fireworks.

The festival is officially to celebrate the crushing of the Catholics in England, and the survival of the tyrants who continue to oppress the people.  It doesn't have to be so.  Tonight, let those of us in England, and in the other territories where the festival is also celebrated, remember the heroism of Catesby, Fawkes and the others.  These brave men attempted to right the wrongs of the Establishment, but failed due to having the basic human decency which the ruling strata lack.  Had they been willing to sacrifice their friends in order to free our nation from the depots, our history would be very different.  Their failing was a mark of their humanity.

I will be joining friends and family to enjoy the fire, the fireworks display and the general good atmosphere which comes from the gathering of the people away from television and all the modern technological developments which most people use as a crutch.  Tonight we will stand in the cold winter night just as our ancestors have for centuries.  The old sectarian hatred which created this festival is all but gone.  Some die-hard anti-Catholics still hold on to a bizarre longing to roast Catholics and sing God Save the Queen. but they are the exception.  Bonfire Night is ironically, one of the few occasions when English folk gather in large numbers, without enforced multi-culturalism.  Tonight England feels like England!

I wish everyone a good evening.  If you are in England tonight, wrap up warmly and enjoy the feeling of being immersed in the native culture of the land.  This is a luxury which is denied to us all too often.  No one is barred from the festivities, but the people who attend are indigenous folk, and others who are happy to soak up our culture rather than to demand the imposition of theirs.  The Cultural Marxists who cannot understand why tradition matters, keep away by their own choice, and that is very much to our pleasure. 

As I watch the display, I will think of the great European heroes who fought to free this nation.  May they be an inspiration to us all.  In our contemporary world, bombing Parliament would only lead to even more State repression.  Let us honour the 1605 martyrs by ensuring we carry in our hearts the spirit of resistance and defiance, and that we continue to speak the truth and to stand against the despots who rule over us.

Catesby, Fawkes and the Revolutionaries of 5.11.(16)05 Presente!

Louis Farrakhan and cowering Europeans.

 Louis Farrakhan is an interesting character.  Vilified by the media, he has travelled a path of learning which has brought him to see the reality of those who rule over us.  Certainly he has made errors, but who hasn't?  Had he whored himself out to the Zionist mafia, like Herman Cain, he would be a darling of the Establishment, rather than labelled as an extremist and largely ignored.  In a recent interview he spoke about the serfs in the media, and whilst not using the terms Zionist or Talmudist, he clearly indicated who it is that runs the American (and European) media.

As well as treating the Establishment media as the lying servile scum they are, Farrakhan has spoken out about the murder of Qaddafi.  It is good that there are people willing to tell the truth about the force destroying our world.  If Farrakhan was European he would be labelled as a Fascist for speaking honestly about the international enemy. 

Why are Europeans so terrified of politically correct insults?  Why?  Because we live in Bolshevised nations where speaking the truth will cost one one's job, and in countries such as Germany, may even cost one's liberty.  We have to be cautious, but caution becomes an excuse for cowardice.  

I spoke out against the Cultural Marxism in the Civil Service, and as a result, I will never be able to work in the public sector again.  I used to be very comfortable financially, now I struggle (really struggle).  When I look back, would my life have been easier if I had just kept my mouth shut and enforced the dogma of the Establishment?  Of course it would.  But, I would have had to betray myself, my family and my country; and live in the knowledge that I had contributed to the international despotism which is rapidly enslaving humanity.

It is said that an individual can do nothing.  I disagree.  An individual can reach others, and in turn if they take the step to free their own minds.  This can snowball into a strata of society which stands against the tyrants in authority.

Louis Farrakhan could have followed the path that Herman Cain has walked, and sold his soul to the Synagogue of Satan.  I could have progressed through the ranks and become a high level oppressor of my own people.  The material benefits are good, but are not worth the cost in losing one's humanity. 

It is time for all people to say no to political correctness.  Let them slander us, let them throw Bolshevik insults.  We can all make a difference.  Even if that difference is small, it is part of a growing revolt against the Talmudic entity.  Material loses are nothing compared to the gains in self-worth from being true to oneself, and whoring for no one.  The legacy of betrayal is a world in which our children will be destroyed as spiritual and cultural beings.  That is a price too high to pay