Microchipping England's dogs - then the rest of the population

In the UK, the countries of England and Wales are to continue spearheading the roll out of the Police State.  We are blanketed in CCTV; we have measures to spy on our every electronic communication (email, sms text, web visit, telephone, et al); we have an army of citizens given the PACE powers of the police; we have a culture of 'grassing' - informing on one another.  This we have already in what is laughingly referred to as a free country!

The ruling power have turned the old fashioned police constable armed only with his truncheon, into a virtual robocop, with side-armed baton, pepper spray, CS gas, Taser, real gun on demand and, (whilst not beating and persecuting us), full CCTV to monitor the people.  Now the Police State has turned its attention to household pets.

Legislation being announced today will require all newborn puppies to be microchipped.  This will be extended to compel all dog owners to microchip their pets.  The rationale for this is that there are a few dangerous dogs, and that if all dogs are microchipped, the dogs can be destroyed and the owners fined.  The cost of the microchips will be the responsibility of the dog owners, and of course the chips will be subject to taxation.  Kerching!  In order to stop a handful of dog owners allowing their dogs to attack people and animals, every single dog in England and Wales must be microchipped.  This will earn the exchequer a very tidy sum of money, and in the democratic UK, there will be no choice but to pay for the chips and obey the diktat of Westminster.

Are there dangerous dogs in the UK?  Indeed there are some, but they are very much a minority.  Are there irresponsible dog owners who allow their animals to attack people, cats, other dogs etc?  Yes there are.  Will microchipping legislation make those who mistreat dogs change their ways?  Of course it won't!  Just as with the laws preventing the ownership of firearms and knives, which has only helped to disarm people so they cannot defend themselves, laws to stop people using dogs as weapons will not effect those who do not obey the law in any case.

What the legislation will do is to raise money for the robbers in Westminster, and increase the powers of the State.  The police and those with PACE powers will be given power to interrogate people to see if their dogs are chipped.  They will have to be equipped with devices to scan dogs for microchips.  The microchips will contain a range of identifying information.  The dog issue is merely a front to something far more sinister.

How long will it be before the chipping of dogs is hailed as a success in curbing canine crime?  We have recently had the absurd spectacle of a dog owner being prosecuted for letting her dog foul the pavement, with the evidence against her being the DNA extracted from the dog fæces!  It will surely become mandatory for the dogs' DNA to be logged on the database linked to the microchip.  The 'success' of DNA evidence will inevitably be used to justify recording the DNA of all people living in the UK, and of course, will be included in the mandatory ID Cards which we are soon to be forced to have (and pay for ourselves).  ID Cards can be lost, so surely it will be logical for ID Cards to be replaced by microchips.

The State is now pushing microchips in dogs, but this is a ruse to mandate microchipping of humans.  They will justify this invasion of our very humanity by claiming that missing children can be more easily found if they are chipped, or that it will make purchasing safer as we will be able to use our microchips to verify our identity, thus preventing fraud or the use of stolen credit cards.  This will be sold to the people in such a way that they will clamour to be chipped out of fear.

Make no mistake, the Establishment view us like dogs and the chipping of animals is but a step towards the real objective which is the chipping of people, complete with inbuilt GPS monitoring to finally destroy any vestige of freedom.  Microchipped pets are more prone to cancer than those which are not chipped.  The security given to pet owners if an animal goes missing is negligible and does not justify the expense or the damage to the pet's health. 

Right now on the Government propaganda broadcaster, the BBC, there is a debate as to whether chipping is a good thing, and of course the debate is rigged to be 100% favourable, with no dissent whatsoever.  The only difference in opinion is as to how harshly the owners of those who do not take the chip should be punished.  This is a serious issue, and one we dismiss at our peril.  The microchip for people is on its way, and if we accept it, we are finished as free humans, and the agenda of turning us literally into cattle (Goyim) will be complete.