We cannot afford the luxury of dealing only with like-minded people, nor should we wish to. Limiting oneself to information which reinforces ones preconceptions is to behave as the organised Left do, with their 'No Platform' strategy. By refusing to consider opposing views, these people block out any chance of being proven wrong, thus condemning themselves to be forever in an ideological prison.
Blindly defending an ideology without questioning it, is akin to a
cult-like devotion which aids those in the aloof leadership ranks, and
is detrimental to
genuine understanding. Only those who are perfect are immune from
making mistakes, and thus have no need to be open to change; no one of
that calibre is alive in the world today, and those who believe they
are, clearly need to be kept from positions where they can influence the
lives of other people.
Whilst the No Platform mentality is largely manifested amongst Reactionary Marxists, the organised Right is also guilty of policing those who allow themselves to be categorised as being within the ideological fold. One only has to think of all the rival organisations which spend more time recruiting from one another than they do gaining converts from the mass populace. Ironically, it is very common for the leaders of the rival groups to preach of the need for Unity against the common enemy; Unity which they insist can only be achieved under their leadership!
In a time when the false dichotomy of Left and Right, Capitalist and Communist, etc, is clearly giving way to the new unified socio-economic and political ideology of Communitarianism, it is absurd that the old divisions are so vigorously defended. The great danger to the Establishment lies in an awakening of those who are hypnotised by the Left-Right charade. Should those who are willing to actively fight for their principles come to realise that the real enemy is laughing at how easily they can be manipulated to fight one another, then a shift of focus from futile and self-destructive squabbling, to vital and realistic action, could be achieved. It is precisely to prevent such an awakening that the rival factions are allowed to continue, even to the point of being ineffectively legislated against, in order to create a false feeling of validation through persecution.
We cannot afford to sit in ideological ivory towers, refusing to communicate with those who do not share our views. If we refuse to speak to those who are not already aware of the underlying reasons for the woes of the world, then all we will be doing is preaching to the converted. If we are to have any chance of defeating our enemies, we need - at the very least - to weaken their support base; that requires preaching to the misdirected but active useful idiots. For those with a religious disposition, it could be said that our task is not 'to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.'
We must engage with everyone who is ready to explore the fact that all is not well with the world. To that end, we have to link up with people who have information which can help to unravel the web of deceit which keeps the Establishment in power. There are many disinfo agents in every organisation, faith and coming-together of like-minded people; especially that which has become known as the Truth Movement. The presence of infiltrators and economically-motivated opportunists does make our task harder, but it does not in any way justify doing nothing. If we are to overcome the global enemy, we must reach out to those who can help, in however small a way. By building loose networks of active individuals, we can limit the damage-capability of the Establishment-appointed leaders of the 'truth movement.'
What we need is genuine leaderless resistance. We cannot hope to awaken the masses. The sheeple have always submitted to those who lead, and are probably incapable of doing anything but. What we need, is to awaken the misled activists, and the opinion formers. Quality is always far more important than quantity. With the best people of every belief, culture, nation etc, fighting for a restoration of freedom, the international order will fail, and a new world will emerge in which can flourish all who appreciate the value of freedom and justice. The sheeple will just as happily graze in freedom as they do in the materialist servitude they cannot even contemplate. Our task is to awaken the shepherds; then the sheep will follow.
Posts
11 comments:
Hello Rufus, it's your old friend here again. You know, your old friend... you scanned a certain book for me once.
Have you seen the website Taki's Magazine?
It's a good, right-wing magazine, and uncharacteristically of such types of publication, it has a very light-hearted tone. It's much more pleasant to read than either the likes of Socialist Worker, or any right-wing writing that is full of doom and gloom, as it so often is.
I'm sure you must remember the book you scanned... by a certain infamous, notorious misogynist and paedophile from Kingston upon Hull?
Anyway, about Taki's Magazine... it's John Derbyshire who is my favourite writer there. Now he may not be entirely to your tastes, but he certainly writes well to mine. His wife is Chinese and he is pro-Israel, but he is more interesting than listening to completely unverifiable conspiracy theories, and things like that.
"...completely unverifiable conspiracy theories"
Such as?
I sense this post is inspired by the discussions revolving around the relative merits of Old Holborn's blog in the comments section of the 'Nation Revisited' post. I can only speak for myself when I say I cast my net fairly widely both within the more political blog world and the many 'truth seeking' anti-NWO websites. Using OH as an example, whilst he often posts about the many things that are wrong in this country he rarely, if ever, sees beyond the political puppet show in Westminster. His solution is merely political and an extreme libertarian (libertine?) one at that. One that includes the advocation of completely open borders. It's been pointed out to him on many occasions the obvious flaws in this position as well as how it plays onto the hands of those pursuit of 'world governance' aka a New World Order. All to no avail.
Another example would be David Icke. There's no denying that much of what he says and exposes rings true. Mixed in with that is a huge dose of unsubstantiated claims that are not only extremely far fetched but only serve to bring into disrepute those more sober minded investigators of the globalist agenda.
Icke has long been exposed as 'controlled opposition'. His 'solutions' have been clearly shown to be the same as those involved in the pursuit of a New World Order. Whether Old Holborn is similarly 'controlled opposition' is open to debate. The 'V' mask with all its connotations raises some suspicions for me.
The point I'm making is that its fine to 'engage with everyone who is ready to explore the fact that all is not well with the world' but there comes a point where some discernment is required. On the face of it OH and Icke are on 'our side' but are they really. I'd argue they aren't. Neither have either shown themselves open to discussion or acceptance of alternative points of view.
I doubt whether you and I would agree on everything but I could tell straight away from looking through some of your old posts that you were both genuine and someone who was fighting the same battle as I am. Reaching out to others is both necessary and worthwhile but only if it is reciprocated to some degree.
Helmsdale: Thank you for the Taki info. I can see by the first article I chanced upon, that the site has the audacity to challenge the way that many white people accept the heel of oppression with barely more than a murmur of dissent (http://takimag.com/article/white_people_are_pussies_john_derbyshire#axzz26F5beudb) - which makes uncomfortable reading, but is very much the case. You say that the author is an active practitioner of miscegenation and that he is pro-Israel? That puts him firmly in the Internationalist camp, although his highlighting of the 'rabbit in the headlights' attitude of Europeans, does give reason to delve deeper.
Revolution Harry: This post is indeed inspired by the discussions around OH. Our greatest danger is the abolition of organic nationhood. Whether it is 'open borders' nonsense, or the New Agey 'We are all Infinite Conciousness' stuff promoted by Icke, the end result of such beliefs is the International Order. For all the words written exposing the machinations of the Internationalists, if these are not backed-up by an indefatigable defence of Nation, Culture, Tradition etc, they are meaningless.
Israel is an interesting issue. The Internationalists want to end the mono-ethnic State, simply because it doesn't blend with the multi-culti sewer being built all around it. In truth, Israel should not be on Palestinian soil - it should be in Birobidjan; but it MUST exist.
Israel must be kept intact in order for there to be somewhere for the Talmudists to live, in splendid isolation from the rest of us, as ordained by by their Elders, since the time of the Levites in Judea. A 'Two State Solution would mean the re-dispersal of those who call themselves Jews, and would create more havoc in the countries they moved to. Ironically, there is merit in helping the Zionists (insofar as herding all the Jews into one territory is concerned, not in indulging in their supremacist fantasies of a 'God-given' right to rule over us) - just not in Palestine!
Rufus...
'Helmsdale' here again.
Is the concept of "white people" an American invention? If so, then that may explain perhaps why it has been so each for the Establishment to push race-mixing on the UK and wider Europe, who had no prior immunity to, nor experience of, non-Europeans...
Personally, I don't think that there is anything that can now be done to stop the decline of the white peoples of the world. In order to stop the decline, you would have to force women to have children that they are not having. It would be akin to rape.
Far-right political parties and groups are totally powerless, and pointless too. They have about as much chance of taking power as there is chance of creating living specimens of the dodo, or raising Henry VIII from the dead.
We are on the way to long-term biological extinction as a "race", and there is absolutely nothing that we can do about it. All "white people" are on the same boat.
...
So what can we do? I don't know. We need to find something more interesting to do, because I sure am sick of thinking about this crap.
I am not wasting any more of my time worrying about this sort of thing.
That's a good question. I think the American experience with slavery has much to answer for. When the Jewish Slave Traders bought African slaves from those who owned them in their own countries (often Arabs, but usually fellow Africans), they hid behind Europeans so as to give the impression that it was Europeans who were responsible for treating humans as property. The emancipation of the African slaves by the European Americans overturned the Talmudic practice, but ironically led to a feeling of animosity between Africans and Europeans (leaving the real guilty party immune from criticism). I think this is the backdrop to the polarisation of race in America.
Of course, until the catastrophe of 1945, we didn't have mass immigration into Europe, and so the small number of non-Europeans who came to our shores were quickly assimilated (except, notably, the self-ghettoising Self-Chosen). We have never really identified ourselves by our skin colour, precisely because we have always lived in more or less homogeneous territories.
Interestingly, the KKK in the USA was created by Jews through their Masonic stooges, to return Africans to slavery, but became a grass roots level European organisation. Look into Albert Pike. The founder of the KKK was as harmful to Europeans as he was hostile to Africans.
With regards to the question, what can we do? I think we need to think in terms of alternative economics, and creating a counter culture which will remain free from the grasp of the enemy. Will we survive as a race? I honestly don't know. With the steady progress to another global conflagration, the question may even be, will anyone survive?
In the short term, things don't look too bad, at least where I live.
But this is not about the short term. This is about the long term. Decades, centuries into the future.
The long term picture looks bleak for the white peoples of the world. That's all I'm saying.
Aside from that, I'm not going to waste much more of my life thinking about this kind of thing. I have one life to live, and I'm gonna live it.
That is all that any of us can do - Live life to the full, and do the best we can for those who come after us.
At the moment things look bleak, but as you say, our future as a people is what counts, and just as the Islamic occupation of Spain, or the Jewish occupation of Russia turned out to be momentary aberrations, so may be the current ideological obsession of the ruling class. Once we have shaken the diseased mentality of the Establishment from our lands, we will be able to rebuild and use this unhappy period as a lesson to ensure the madness never takes hold again.
Living in this mad time may amplify our feelings of despair, but it also gives us reason to fight. We will overcome, because we have to, for ourselves, and more importantly, for the future.
Very interesting point regarding whether the concept of a White people is an American invention.
It is interesting that 'White supremacy' is accepted as a term to describe nationalists/national socialists when it has nothing in common with them.
It is the same nonsense also pushed by the Yank that all White people are the same, when we are most definately not!
We ought to forget the Yanks and define our ideas and ideals through the European prisms (and that includes Russia). Just so the dumbass Yank knows that when we refer to a Pole/Romanian/Spaniard we do not need to add the proviso 'White' as all intelligent people know that there is no need.
Yankland is finished, the only shame is that the South were not successful in their secession and that it was not the Germans instead of the Anglos who were 'top of the pile'.
And in case anyone is wondering whether I am anti-Yank...too bloody right I am!
'Helmsdale' here again.
By the way Rufus I used to drink quite a lot of beer, but I gave up the booze completely earlier on this year and I can definitely say it's made me a happier, healthier and saner person. There's no way I'm going back to ever drinking again.
All you have to do these days is to go into any town or city centre on a Friday night and it's a case of "behold the alcoholic animals". I still do go to pubs to meet people, but just drink soft drinks now. I think the booze industry is just one means of keeping the population sedated.
After all, what else is there to do on a Friday night? It's just a bit of escapism that people engage in to spice up their mediocre, boring, dull lives.
But it also makes you feel like shit the day after, so it's not worth it.
Yankee stupidity at its worst: W.A.S.P. - WHITE Anglo Saxon Protestant. Anglo-Saxons cannot be anything but White!
Post a Comment