Feminism: Enslaving women and abolishing femininity

What is Feminism?  Looking at the word, it must surely be something to do with celebrating the female, and all that is feminine, right?  Well, no, it isn't.  Then what else can it be?  If it isn't a celebration of the wonders of the female, then what can it be?  Feminism is a classic example of double-speak; it is no less than a crusade to destroy the female.

Feminists start with the premise that women are oppressed by male society.  They argue that it is an act of oppression which sees men killing themselves with heavy manual labour, whilst women are encouraged to undertake physically less demanding work than men, or to stay at home and look after the family.  What feminists fail to appreciate is that men and women are built differently and have different qualities to one another.  According to feminists, men and women are exactly the same, and so should be treated as such.  To anyone who has ever encountered a member of the opposite sex, the notion that we are no different is ludicrous.

Early Feminists argued that it was wrong that only men were allowed to cast meaningless votes for political parties who would ignore their promises upon election.  They side-stepped the fact that only men from the ruling class were allowed to take part in the sham democratic system.  After years of campaigning, universal suffrage was introduced, leading to the current situation where every drooling buffoon who can make a cross on a ballot paper, can vote.  Rather than demand that the fraudulent democracy be overturned, and a system of government be introduced to run the country by virtue of expertise, rather than by how convincingly one could smile at the electorate, the feminists and their fellow travellers, extended the already failed system to become the ochlocratic charade we endure today.  Thanks for that.

Having secured the survival of the fake democratic system, and prevented its replacement with rule by an educated elite who would have governed according to their specialised expertise, the feminists set about abolishing the family.  Why?  Because, apparently it is degrading for a woman to be a mother, and to look after her husband and home!  Absolute nonsense!  Motherhood is one of the hardest but most important tasks anyone could undertake.  To belittle the contribution to the nation of those who raise the next generation is sheer lunacy.  Lunacy it may be, but again, the feminists scored a victory, and now children are seen by many as a burden, to be dispatched to strangers in nurseries and schools as soon as it is practicable.  Marriage became old-fashioned, and so children without Fathers became more prevalent.  The bastardised society inevitably became the greater broken home, wracked by crime and disorder - exactly as those behind the feminist movement planned.

Bolstering the fraudulent rule of the despots, breaking the family, wrecking marriage, destroying children, turning women into unpaid whores and unborn child-killers  - all theses objectives of feminism were achieved under the banner of liberation from oppression; but the lunacy did not end there.

Women were told that it was their right to be producer-consumers, and that the men who protected them from wage-slavery were their oppressors.  Thus women joined the workforce, and in order to compete with men in male environments, had to become caricatures of men.  Feminist propaganda describes men as cruel, manipulative and deceitful, thus women infected with feminism believe they have to become that way, only moreso.  Patience, empathy, compassion, and all other virtues are decried by feminists as weaknesses resulting from subjugation to patriarchal oppression; all that matters is the pursuit of money, which has to be undertaken in the manner of an individualistic brute.  Some men fit the caricature, but most do not.  Those who have have had female bosses of the feminist variety will know how unfeminine these creatures can be, and how unpleasant they are to work for.

Women have qualities which should be nurtured and developed.  Feminism denies the innate qualities which women tend to have.  Thankfully only a minority of women have bought the feminist lie in its entirety, but the ones that have are a menace, thrusting their mendacity on all who are exposed to them.  The impact of feminism has been profound, as most women have adopted some parts of the insane ideology.   Lesbianism, is of course, another feminist victory, and a dead end for its victims.

Feminism has been a negative force which has wrecked the countries in which it has been allowed to take hold.  Such is the power of the feminist media that women have become conditioned to view all who defend their natural right to be feminine, (and to be protected from the harsh masculine domain), as enemies and oppressors.   What is oppressive about wishing to empower a woman to raise her own children without the intervention of the State?  What is oppressive about taking on the male role of bread-winner and provider, so that the woman is free to fulfil her natural role as nurturer?  What is oppressive about a husband being a husband?

In the natural society, the relationship between men and women is complimentary, not competitive.  Each has his or her own abilities and qualities which together are mutually beneficial.  Feminism is the Trojan horse which has ruined our lands under the guise of a movement for emancipation.  Feminism is a lie, and the sooner it is consigned to history, the sooner our people will be free.  Equality which reduces the people to servitude, is the ultimate tyranny.

Houla Massacre: Another BBC Lie

The above image needs to be clicked on to enlarge it, and then read thoroughly.  The BBC has yet again been caught out pushing propaganda on behalf of the war mongers of the Establishment.  The latest incident features imagery of a child skipping over the bagged up corpses of slain civilians.  According to the BBC, the corpses are those of Syrians murdered by the Syrian government, and are incontrovertible proof that the government of Bashar Al Assad must be overthrown.  The so-called Houla Massacre is a complete fraud; the corpses are those of Kurds recovered from a mass grave in 2003 in Al Musayyib. 

The BBC have really surpassed themselves with this propaganda gaff.  Not only have they used stock imagery to invent a massacre in order to demand military intervention against Syria, but the imagery they have used features people who were murdered with the full blessing of the UK government.  At the time that the Kurds were slaughtered in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was the darling of the west, and just as with the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians, the victims were of no consequence to the western despots.

The fake Houla Massacre comes at the time that the Serbian hero, Ratko Mladić, is on trial for the murder of Muslims in Srebrenica.  The Houla Massacre is a repetition of the Srebrenica Massacre - Neither of them is real, and both of these propaganda exercises serve to stir up hatred for besieged nations fighting for their very survival against the international aggression of finance imperialism.

The BBC presents itself as the most beloved broadcaster of the world.  Of course this is a typical propaganda technique.  For those who care to look behind the lies, the BBC is a loathsome and belligerent propaganda tool of a regime of tyrants who have no empathy for humanity; only a lust for wealth and power.

In 2001 the BBC infamously broadcast live video footage of the Salomon Building (World Trade Centre 7) collapsing due to the (State) terrorist attack.  It broadcast too early, and the building could clearly be seen standing and smouldering behind the reporter's left shoulder.  The BBC was instrumental in creating the Al Qaeda myth which blamed Afghanistan for 9/11, the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie which justified the invasion of Iraq, the Srebrenica lie which legitimised the destruction of Serbia and the creation of the bandit states of Kosovo and Bosnia-Metohija, the Benghazi færytale used to crush Libya, and now it is driving the entire anti-Syrian campaign, and the campaign against Iran.  All the while, the BBC has ignored the crimes of Israel against the people of Palestine and other territories occupied by the Jewish State.

The BBC is a lie factory.  It has been the mouthpiece of the British State since its birth.  It has propagandised ceaselessly for the materialistic Internationale, and has destroyed the lives of those who oppose its sinister agenda.  The BBC still misuse the photographs of the German victims of Red Army brutality and RAF terror bombing in the Second World War; presenting them as dead Jews killed by the Germans.  The misuse of the Al Musayyib photographs as proof of a massacre in Houla is a repetition of the propaganda against Germany, and indeed all the 'Goyim' of Europe.

The BBC is the bastion of political correctness, and uses its so-called entertainment programmes to defame heterosexuality, faithfulness, ethnic cohesion, culture and indeed all that is natural and wholesome.  The BBC is the enemy of humanity.  Everything it produces is the propaganda of the Establishment.

The lies of the BBC are being used to soften the British people so that the people accept, nay demand, war against Syria.  These lies must be exposed.  If we stay silent as the BBC promotes the destruction of all nations who do not bow to the Zionist Internationale, then who will speak when they come for us?  We need a common front against the vipers of the Establishment.  

To anyone who still pays a licence fee to this vermin, surely it is time to stop?  Let them know why you will not pay for their lies.  We in the UK have to inform our countrymen of the truth.  The lies of the BBC are repeated hypnotically until they become accepted subconsciously.  It is not enough to understand that the BBC lies; we must inform everyone we can of the truth.  Don't let the Houla lie become the justification for the destruction of Syria and the expansion of the Israeli terror state.  We have voices.  We must use them.

Israeli politicians fight against Multi-culturalism in Israel

All is not well in Israel.  The home of the architects of multi-culturalism is being rocked by the disastrous ideology of their own making.  Like the Golem of Prague, Multi-culturalism is out of control, and now having destroyed the enemies of its creator, seeks to destroy the creator as well.

Multi-culturalism is the most destructive weapon of the internationalists.  No nation can survive if it has to abandon its cultural integrity to accommodate people who have different traditions and aspirations.  Multi-culturalism destroys natural organic cultures and leaves in its wake a mass of bland incomplete meaningless non-cultures which cannot rise above the level of animalistic materialism.  This is exactly what the internationalists which to achieve; a world of rootless and interchangeable producer-consumers who are kept away from high ideals by having no historical, ethnic, cultural and geographical point of reference from which to form their own identities.  Multi-culturalism is the genocidal weapon of internationalism.

In Israel, the Jewish State itself is under attack.  Treacherous liberal politicians have betrayed the Jewish people and allowed for vast numbers of immigrants to enter the country.  Interestingly, the non-Jewish immigrants are referred to as infiltrators, which is quite appropriate.  All immigrants are infiltrators insofar as they are being used to destroy nations and pave the way for a single international slave state.  It was Jews who created the liberal lunacy of mass-migration, and 'minority rights' (except in countries such as South Africa where the European minority has no rights whatsoever).  The Jews considered themselves immune to the cancer of internationalism which was meant to destroy the Goyim and create a Talmudic utopia where the Jews were waited on hand and foot by the lower animals.  What the Jews are experiencing for themselves, is what they have crafted for the rest of us.

In Tel Aviv, the Hativka district is almost completely populated by 'asylum seekers' and refugees whose countries have been devastated by wars for the creation of the one world state; wars which have been fuelled by Zionist imperialism.  The people in Tel Aviv who are suffering through their neighbourhoods being turned into Third World slums, only have their government to thank.  

In a sane world, nations would be protected from foreign interference, and mono-culturalism would be the norm.  The people of Hativka, who ironically have had all 'hope' of a happy future torn from under them, are suffering as a result of the supremacist ideology which has its roots in Talmud.  There would be no refugees if the right of people to live amongst their own kind and live according to their own cultures was respected, and if economies were fully self-sufficient, with absolute national ownership of everything being the norm, and the notion of multi-national corporatism and international finance imperialism being something to be guarded against.  As is usual in every country, the elite gain whilst the common people suffer.

The reaction to the infiltration of Israel by non-Jews has been protest and in places violence.  If the outpourings of frustration at having their jobs, housing and services given to foreigners were those of Europeans in Europe, there would be footage in the mainstream media and hysterical cries of 'racism' levelled at the people who have been denied a democratic voice to oppose the destruction of their countries, and so have no choice but to demonstrate.  As the protests are those of Jews in Israel, the media hysteria is deafeningly silent.

There are those who would gloat that the Golem of multi-culturalism is now wreaking havoc in Israel, but that helps no one.  We need to destroy the Golem once and for all and restore all nations to stability and mono-ethnic, mono-cultural strength.

Likud MK, Danny Dannon, has called for transit camps to be set up in preparation for the relocation of the immigrants to their countries of origin.  The politically correct internationalists referred to the use of transit camps in Europe as concentration camps and invented the lie of the holocaust to forever blacken the idea of population relocation as something sinister.  Just as the transit camps of the 1940s were necessary to defend Europe, so are those proposed by MK Dannon if Israel is to survive.

As reported in Haaretz,

Dannon said that the immediate solution for calming the situation and for putting a stop to the violence requires the evacuation of the African migrants from south Tel Aviv.

"The infiltrators must be distanced immediately," he said. "We must expedite the construction of temporary detention facilities and remove Africans from population centres."

MK Michael Ben Ari (National Union), who makes regular appearances at protests against the migrant population of Tel Aviv, nonetheless said he was “very upset by the violence.” Ben Ari pointed out, however, that “there are things that are outside of my control, that’s the reality.”

Ben Ari expressed satisfaction that his campaign to remove the migrant population from Tel Aviv has begun to gain momentum. “Suddenly we see MK’s from Likud and Kadima showing up at protests. Suddenly I hear the Interior Minister saying things I’ve said myself,” said Ben Ari.

The only solution to the tragedy of multi-culturalism is for the entire international experiment to be abandoned and for all countries to be restored to their indigenous populations.  In the case of Israel, this would mean the relocation of the Jews.  An end to the banking fraud and its usurious interest demands would leave the economies of the world free to support their own people, and would make migration unBirobidjan (or even back to their original homeland, Khazaria, if the non Jewish Khazars would allow their return).

The scenes of outright supremacist racism in the following video are typical of the Talmudic mindset.  For the sake of all humanity, the movement of people which provokes such hatred must be reversed, and a natural healthy world restored. 

Direct Link to video: http://youtu.be/gOomBSTTzrU

A little security to stave off a lot of harm

Periodically I am asked details about myself, and I routinely answer to the effect that I cannot answer.  I am not being standoffish by this reluctance to part with personal information.  Rather I am being cautious.  

Some years ago when I was far too trusting (and perhaps to confident) for my own good, I did verbal battle with a group of internationalists.  The outcome of our discourse was that I was followed home, and in the early hours of the morning, my flat was firebombed.  A neighbour called the police, who asked me what I had done to deserve being attacked!  A short while afterwards, a parcel with wires sticking out of it was placed under my car.  I very much doubt that the parcel was anything to worry about, but the message I was sent was clear enough - I had stepped on the wrong toes, and the attack against my flat was to be but the start.  My rental period was nearly over anyway, so I took the opportunity to move to a new location.  Since that time, I have been more cautious with regards to giving out personal information.

It is not brave and heroic to make oneself an easy target.  By using a pseudonym, and keeping all identifiable information to myself, I am protecting my family.  Does it really matter who I am?  In a war for freedom against a police state with its violent 'politically correct' foot-soldiers, the only weapon we have available to us is the truth, and the will to speak the truth.  In the grander scheme, our individual identities are meaningless.  There are those who seek glory, and in the pursuit of it sacrifice their children's future.  I am not amongst them. 

It may seem pointless to keep information private, when we all know that the police have all our details and internet activity on record.  It is the useful idiots who ally themselve to the State but do not know it, who we need to protect ourselves against.  One day we will have to openly do battle with the collaborators, but that time is not now.  As the struggle gets harder, and the power of the enemy increases, it is the duty of each and every one of us to keep ourselves safe for the time when we may have to make the ultimate sacrifice.  We will not be able to help our kin if we are neutralised now, when we can avoid it.

The UK is a dangerous place.  A little caution now, will serve us well for the future.  Security is a good habit to get into.

A gay day for a dead democracy

The UK coalition government is possibly the most hated government in living memory, and it is certainly a contender for the least democratic.  At a time when the policies of government have pushed the people to think only of how they are to survive, the cynical opportunists are wasting no time to break every election pledge, and push forward with an agenda that the people did not, and would not, vote for.

Under the lie of 'austerity', the government are transferring wealth away from the poorest sections of society, into the coffers of the richest.  Giving tax breaks to their friends and their masters in the Establishment, and cutting services for the common people, the government insist that only by encouraging enterprise and cutting bureaucracy can the country struggle out of recession.  What they fail to mention is that the recession is artificially created in order to redistribute wealth away from the people.

The proposed re-privatisation of the Banks taken into public and part-national ownership under the previous regime, is to be conducted at a loss to the taxpayer.  Yet again, the bankers are to gain at our expense.  If the government was honest in any way, it would admit that the banking crisis was created to increase the grip of international finance, and that the only solution to our economic woes is for the government to issue its own currency, and pay the banks what they are owed in debt, using worthless pieces of paper created with no backing - in exactly the same way as the banks created the debt in the first place.  Would the banks then fail?  Hopefully so.  However, what would be guaranteed would be that the people would owe the banks nothing, and the graduated income tax system introduced as a temporary measure to repay the Bankers' loans to pay for the war against Napoleon, could finally be abolished.  Of course, as the politicians serve the Bankers and not the people, this outcome could not be expected under the present system.

On top of the theft of the people's money; in effect reducing us all to wage-slaves who have no option but to pay their taxes forever, the government have 'relaxed' green belt restrictions, allowing for the already over-populated UK to be flooded with millions more people who will be housed at the cost of the destruction of the land.  Our country already relies on imports of food, thus an increase in population can only make the suffering which will come when food imports are interrupted, more devastating than if the population stayed at roughly the ridiculous level it is at now.  Mass starvation will come.  The disruption of the food supply is not in doubt; the only question is when it will come, and how many people will die.

Not giving a damn about the people in the UK, the government also do not care one iota for the people of other countries which they seek to exploit.  The war criminal, William Hague, is eager to condemn the Syrian government for not being democratic, but he conveniently forgets that Bashar Al Assad is far more popular than the politicians in Westminster, and that the opposition so beloved of Hague is comprised of foreign mercenaries, and terrorists in the employ of the UK and US Establishment.  The dead and dying in Syria, just like their counterparts in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia et al are the responsibility of the UK government and its partners-in-crime.

Theft and murder are high on the agenda of the UK government, but their anti-human crusade doesn't stop there.  The government are at the forefront of the moral destruction of the UK.  By forcing the idea that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice and that it is just as valid as heterosexuality, the government is condemning the misery of homosexuality onto generations to come.  Homosexuality is a mental disorder caused by a chemical imbalance; it is wholly curable.  Legislating for homosexuals to be able to 'marry' as do healthy people, is to normalise the abnormal.  This makes it far harder for those who are afflicted by the condition to seek help.  Shewing that the government despises its own MPs as much as the rest of us, the Liberal faction of the coalition is adamant that MPs will not be allowed a free vote on the issue, and will be forced to vote for homosexual marriage.  Even the hated Tory faction will allow its member to vote as they see fit.  The ironically titled Liberal Democrats are very illiberal and absolutely anti-democratic.

Democracy is dead in the UK.  It is as dead as the children murdered by NATO war 'planes in Sirte, or by MI6/CIA 'Al Qaeda' bombs in Damascus.  The only thing left to do with the festering cadaver is to give it a good Christian burial, and to move on to a new society where the living decide their own fate, and are not dictated to by the inhuman shells of the living-dead.

Searchlight: Fighting against Freedom since 1962

The UK is home to the centre of international finance capitalism, known alternately as the Crown, or the City of London.  The Establishment which controls the UK has been so thoroughly mixed with Khazar financiers, that it is not inaccurate to describe the ruling class of the UK as Jews.  This is not 'racist' or anti-Semitic (which of course it wouldn't be, considering most Jews in the UK are Caucasian Khazars); it is simply descriptive.  Against this backdrop of total Zionism in the political and economic power elite, it should come as no surprise that anyone who speaks out against those who view the common people as their property, is slandered as an enemy of freedom.  This couldn't be further from the case.  Those who oppose the rule of the Establishment are the true defenders of freedom, but such is the Orwellian nature of the UK, that we are slandered for seeking to break free of our chains.  We who are not content to be producer-consumers with no identity other than our bank details are apparently a danger to 'democracy'. How dare we ask for more than the scraps from our masters' table?

In the UK, anyone who does not follow the diktat of the Establishment is instantly labelled as a far-right extremist, Fascist, Nazi etc.  The likes of the UAF are more than happy to use physical intimidation and violence to silence their opponents, but they then proclaim that they are defending freedom against 'Fascism'.  Think about that for one moment.  

According to the truth-distorters, Fascism can be defined as anything which is a danger to freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of expression, and indeed any form of freedom whatsoever.  The Marxist self appointed guardians of 'freedom' seek to address the problems of Fascism by silencing those who disagree with them, using 'any means necessary', or to put that into plain English, physical violence and threats of violence.

The central organising point for the 'anti-Fascist' is the Searchlight Magazine, which is controlled by Gerry and Sonia Gable.  The Gables are hard line Communists and Jews, and so are hardly impartial defenders of democracy.  They have an agenda for the abolition of national frontiers and for the establishment of a global workers' plantation, where the oppressed proletariat of the modern age become the slaves of the Chosen elite.  To even use the word Zionism is to bring down their ire.  They are ideologically opposed to any semblance of freedom which threatens their Marxist utopia.  Although opposed to the Socialist Workers Party on minutiæ of Marxian dogma, they are proud to work with the SWP front group, United Against Fascism, by sharing information regarding the 'Fascist' enemy, thus enabling a more efficient way to beat the enemy into submission.  They are also very keen on using the police to do their dirty work, although they hypocritically attack the police in their publications as, yes you guessed it, Fascists!

Common tactics used by the Searchlight family include:

• Printing photographs of opponents in their publications, complete with names, addresses, and work details
• Contacting employers and threatening to boycott their products and/or protest on their premises if named individuals are not immediately dismissed from employment
• Telephoning staff at venues where meetings are due to be held (or in progress), and threatening violence against the staff if the meetings continue.  This level of intimidation can include bomb hoaxes, and considering the connection of the 'anti-Fascist' organisations with the State-controlled terrorist IRA, these threats are not to be ignored (See Dominic Noonan, a Documentary (parts 1 and 2))
• Anonymously tipping off the police with bogus calls about criminal activity, to ensure meetings are raided and wrecked, despite being perfectly legal
• Massing in large numbers then attacking individuals, leaving the victims in need of hospital treatment, or in some instances, leaving the victims dead.

The tactics of Searchlight and the UAF centre on the single objective of denying anyone who does not agree with their disturbed politics, any freedom whatsoever.  They fight to stop freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and ultimately, freedom of thought.  In their fight, they have the full support of the Trades Unions Congress (hope not hate), and the government.  They are constantly invited to speak on the BBC to advise the public as to the dangers to democracy posed by those they fight, and are even invited into schools to indoctrinate educate children into the ways of politically correct multi-culti international servitude.

So who are these evil people who the darlings of the Establishment are fighting to silence?  Who are the people who are so terrible that the government can turn a blind eye to violence and terrorism in order to keep their views unheard?

The evil doers include:

• Campaigners for Morality and Decency
• Defenders of Culture
• Opponents of the 'New World Order'
• Real (non-Marxian) Socialists
• Libertarians
• Free Speech activists
• Global Warming / Man-made Climate Change researchers
• Friends of Palestine
• Crusaders for Free Libya, Syria, and all the other countries under military attack by the NATO terror
• Religious and spiritually-focused groups
• Pro-lifers
• Historical revisionists and Holocaust-truth seekers
• 9/11, 7/7, and all False Flag exposing groups
• Anyone who believes in genuine global racial diversity through local indigenous ethnic exclusivity
• Patriots, Nationalists and all anti-internationalists
• Opponents of the European Union, United Nations and the coming global Slave State
• Distributists and Social Credit advocates
• Advocates of a Usury-free economy and an end to international materialism
• Genuine Workers' Rights groups
• Defenders of border controls and all who oppose unlimited immigration and population displacement
• Defenders of Motherhood and the sacred right of Women to raise their own children and not be wage-slaves
• Home Schoolers

The above list is far from exhaustive, and I would expect that readers of this blog

True to the spirit of anti-Fascism, Searchlight operates a 'No Platform' policy which means that anyone who is libelled by their odorous publication is denied the right to defend him or herself.  All opposing views are silenced, and the only comments allowed are those which support the agenda of the internationale.  This is what passes for democracy in the UK.  If Searchlight was just another crank magazine aimed at drug-addled students, it wouldn't merit an article exposing its vile nature.  However, the self-Chosen emissaries of anti-Fascism are regularly invited to advise the police, social services, schools and other State groups on policy.  They are a real menace to freedom, and need to be confronted at every opportunity.  

How ironic that the over-used word Fascism has been twisted to describe the very actions that Searchlight indulges in.  But then of course, it is in the nature of the advocates of internationalism that the terminology they use has no bearing on reality.  I would invite the Gables to discuss what I have written, but then as the UK's foremost censors, I doubt that they would have the decency to talk with anyone who dares to disagree with them.  Violence, intimidation and terror are their preferred means of communication.  And they dare to claim they are defending democracy?  Chutzpah anyone?

Further Reading:

http://searchlightexposed.com/
Liars Ought to have Good Memories

Libya's Puppet Leader honours his owner's uniformed thugs

The puppet interim ruler of Libya, Abdurrahim El-Keib, is in London to propagandise for his pay-masters against the country over which they installed him to rule for them.  El-Keib has layed a wreath of white roses and carnations at the place where British security forces murdered UK police woman, Yvonne Fletcher.  The 1984 murder was blamed on the Libyan government, and used to create an atmosphere of hatred against the North African country.  The Fletcher false flag operation was followed up by the bombing of  Pan Am 103 as it flew over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people.  Like the Fletcher case, the Lockerbie victims were murdered to dæmonise Libya, and the real culprits were the UK and US security forces.

Yvonne Fletcher was shot by gunmen who were outside the Libyan Embassy in St James Square London.  Her murder was used to justify economic sanctions against Libya, and the breakdown in diplomatic relations between London and Tripoli.  Interestingly, one of the men at the scene at the time of the Fletcher shooting was none other than Peter Power - a man who would later become infamous for running drills to deal with bombings on the London Transport network at exactly the time that MI5 bombed the Underground and Tavistock Square.  Peter Power has not been investigated for his role in the Fletcher shooting or the 7/7 atrocity, but then of course as a State operative, he wouldn't be.

The killing of Yvonne Fletcher was designed to associate Muammar Al Qaddafi with terrorism.  This prepared the way for the USAF bombing of Libya in 1986.  Having created the image of Qaddafi as a mad dictator who murdered innocent police women in cold blood, there was no organised protest to the attempted murder of Qaddafi by ærial terror. 

In 1988, the Lockerbie bombing took place, with 270 people murdered by the CIA and MI5.  In the eyes of the public, this was a Qaddafi attack in revenge for the murder of his adopted daughter in the 1986 US terror strike, which of course was a reprisal for the 1984 murder of Fletcher.  Each event was built on the one before it, and each helped to create the idea that Libya must be liberated from the rule of Qaddafi (although the Libyan system of People's Congresses meant that Qaddafi was not a dictator in any case).

An official enquiry was launched into the slaying of Fletcher, but its findings have still not been released.  Surely if there was incontrovertible proof that someone inside the Libyan Embassy had killed Fletcher, then the results of the enquiry would have been reported widely?  Afterall, Fletcher was killed on television having been positioned perfectly for the TV cameras.

In 1996, the US government contracted Osama Bin Laden's Al Qaeda units (CIA owned) to murder Qaddafi, paying their favourite bogeyman $100,000 to murder the Libyan Head of State.  In the whole Libyan saga there have been plenty of terrorist atrocities, but aimed against Qaddafi's Libya, rather than directed by them.

In 1999, Libya sought an end to the sanctions which had been imposed since 1984 and accepted 'general responsibility' for the killing of WPC Fletcher.  This error in judgement, gave credibility to the MI5 propaganda tale of evil Qaddafi the woman killer.  The Libyan Embassy siege was major news in the UK, following the assassination of Fletcher by her colleagues, and the constant repetition of her slaying in front of anti-Qaddafi demonstrators (of the NTC/Al Qaeda variety), burned into the public consciousness the idea that Libya was ruled by a despot who must be stopped.  Qaddafi's ploy to end sanctions against Libya by accepting responsibility for a crime that loyal Libyans did not commit only further alienated his regime in the eyes of the public.  Indeed, coupled with the færytale of Libyan responsibility for Lockerbie, the media-drugged people of the UK could barely be expected to think anything other than that the Libyan regime was 'evil'.

Fletcher was killed as part of a long running propaganda exercise to justify the invasion of Libya and the theft of its oil.  The psychological warfare culminated in the murder of Qaddafi which was graphically broadcast on television throughout the world.  In the UK, the media linked the brutal destruction of Libya to Fletcher and Lockerbie, and declared that Qaddafi had brought his murder upon himself.  The media were literally judge, jury and executioner in this case.

El-Keib is a paid traitor, in the service of the international criminals who destroyed the country he now rules.  His presence in London is a continuation of the false flag propaganda against Libya, which is being used to justify the take-over of the oil rich country, and the snuffing out of direct democracy and self-sufficiency.  Yesterday he vowed to bring those guilty of the Lockerbie massacre to justice, and today he repeated the propaganda against Libya in the Fletcher shooting; El Keib is proving himself to be a very useful puppet, who is more than happy to reinforce the lies against the previous administrative system, and by so doing ensure that the real criminals (Al Qaeda, NTC, MI5, CIA etc) get away with murder, again and again.

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/0l1J11WNQAs

Society is drowning in pornography

A reader asked me if I watch pornography.  I do not, but I would be lying if I said that I have never seen any. I think that in our decadent society, it has become something of a rite of passage for boys to get hold of a porno video and some beer and go through the awkward and embarrassing ordeal of pretending to be more experienced than they really are.  I think for boys, porn provides information which can be used to more plausibly lie to your friends about how far you have gone with girls, when in fact you are still innocent. Watching porn is like smoking, or drinking underage - it is supposed to make you more grown up, but really just damages your health.

Hollywood and television push the idea that children who watch porn, drink and smoke are more grown up than those who don't - and that being grown up is all that matters. Perhaps having fallen prey to the damaging power of television when a teenager is why I am so opposed to watching television these days, and to watching all negative films etc, which has to include porn.

I am not an angel by any means, and I have at times been a part of the herd. As I wrote in yesterday's article, freeing oneself is the hardest battle, and a very hard battle it is indeed. I used to watch television soap operas to the point of addiction (yes, even Coronation Street). Soaps tell you what to do; porn tells you how to treat members of the opposite sex. In both cases the propaganda is woefully wrong. Soaps are now semi-pornographic in content, so the decadence and selfishness of the porn industry, is now fused with the social engineering of the entertainment industry.  This is not good.

Pornography teaches that it is OK to have sex with absolutely anyone, and that there is absolutely no need to know the individual one is having sex with.  From a male perspective, this reduces all females to the position of objects to ejaculate into/over.  Pornography has been a key influence in the sexualisation of society.  The sexualised society has no barriers of decency.  Adultery has become normalised, with marriage offering no protection from sexual predators, or indeed the wedding ring preventing the individual from having extra-marital sex.  I have stated that I am no angel, and that I have made grave mistakes in my life, but adultery is not one of them.  I find myself in a shrinking minority, as marriage vows become meaningless.

Porn and the entertainment media have been used to destroy the institution of marriage.  The printed media are awash with stories of infidelity, and with ridiculous 'celebrity' marriages which last for a few months, before the couple part and then re-marry or shack-up with other people of various hues and sexes.  The message such celebrity behaviour sends is that marriage is only for as long as it is convenient, and that divorce is no big deal.  This has led to many people not bothering to marry at all, and drifting from one sexual relationship to another; often with clandestine sexual encounters interspersed along the way.  Marriage is a lifelong commitment which must be one of absolute monogamy, but for many people (probably most people in the UK) the probability of one spouse 'cheating' on the other is very high.

Television programmes such as 90210 concentrate on stories of children 'shagging' one another, and on the need to be rich and popular.  I haven't seen any more up-to-date television, but I can only assume the emphasis on sex and materialism has increased rather than decreased.  Children are even more susceptible to the harmful influence of film and television than adults, which is why such media are becoming increasingly hard to distinguish from soft porn - and why pornography is becoming ever more extreme and mechanical.

I used to watch Emmerdale Farm with its stories about farming and rural Yorkshire.  I stopped watching it when it became Emmerdale, and the farming folk were replaced by bed-hopping urbanites.  I wasted a lot of precious time glued to the idiot box, but that time did at least allow me to witness the deterioration of television and the merger of the entertainment industry with soft porn. 

One only has to look at the music industry to see how far our society has fallen; whereas music was once an uplifting influence, it is now a sex-fest with the likes of Lady Gaga promoting homosexuality and Rhianna promoting sado-masochism.  All modern music, of course, promotes miscegenation.  'Pop' music is a tool of the social engineers which is used to break down barriers to internationalism; barriers of decency, fidelity, heterosexuality, family, ethnic identity, culture, tradition, and all that is wholesome.  Pop music  has become porn music.

The taxation system in the UK punishes families.  The welfare system actively encourages women to have children out of wedlock, and to raise their children without the father(s).  The deification of selfishness, materialism, and sex for fun (1960s-spawned hippy free-love, man), are all reinforced by the propaganda that the only person who matters is oneself.  To destroy a society, the building blocks must be broken.  Creating the idea that monogamy and family are old-fashioned and oppressive, has been a key objective of the internationalists; pornography has pushed this agenda to the point where morality is mocked.  The likes of the EDL who demand the right of Muslim women to dress like prostitutes, are a fine example of the mind-rotting effect of the sexualised society.  Islam has no place in Europe, but the belief expressed by liberal-reactionaries who promote the idea that it is a woman's 'right' to dress and behave as a whore, is outrageous.

Pornography has no place in a healthy society.  In Franco's Spain, pornography was illegal, but brothels were not.  There will always be men who are prepared to pay for sex, and men who are unable to have a meaningful relationship.  In the UK, pornography is everywhere, yet prostitution is illegal.  The result is that men have become overwhelmed by sexual imagery and due to the dehumanising quality of porn, feel they have a right to sex when they want it.  In the clubs and bars across the UK, it is common for men to go out with the express aim of having anonymous sex with anyone who will let them.  Women are just as bad as men in this regard.  This has led to a destruction of monogamy and marriage.  

For some men, the constant sexual imagery in the media has created the idea that they can get sex when they want, and when this isn't the case, a minority of men become rapists.  In Franco's Spain, children were not exposed to porn on the television, in music, and in the 'sex education' lessons at school, and women were far less in danger of being raped than in the decadent and diseased liberal mess of the UK.  Of course to praise Franco's prohibition of pornography is to invite screams of 'Fascist!' from the liberal lunatics who run the UK asylum, and who presumably think that the sexualisation of children, spread of homosexuality, and increase in rape, is fine, as these phenomena are a part of the diverse and enriching multi-culti international slave state where sex and possessions are all that matter.  When the internationalists speak of enrichment, they fail to mention that it is the Establishment who become materially enriched as we become spiritually and culturally impoverished  The protection of nation, family, culture, and decency, is anathema to our would-be rulers and their liberal puppets.

Pornography is destructive to the mind of the individual, and to society at large.  Not only must pornography of the 'mucky mag' and sex shop variety be avoided, but also the far more invasive everyday pornography of the Daily Mail/Sun/Star etc, TV Soaps, Hollywood 'Romantic Comedies' etc, and the entire media and education system.  At the risk of inviting howls of liberal indignation, Franco was right.  It is far better that legalised prostitution in areas remote from the public exists to cater for those who cannot find a suitable spouse, than for all of society to be turned into a sexual free-for-all, in which children are targeted as customers for the filth industry.  Give me the protection of El Caudillo over the pollution of the Jewish porn-lords any day!  Do we really need to see the promotion of promiscuity and degenearcy every time we walk down a street with billboards?  Wouldn't a return to the natural society of morality and mental health be much better?

Freedom comes from within.

We are own own prison warders. We are the ones who keep the doors to freedom slammed shut. By refusing to open our minds and allow the light of truth to push away the shadows of fear, we are condemning ourselves to a living death.

There are those who are happy to eat toxic food, think toxic thoughts and live the toxic existence given to them on a plate by the hidden elite. They think they are free, so have no desire to break free from a prison cell that they won't even acknowledge.

There is a sizable portion of the indigenous population in Europe who love Big Brother and will fight to protect him; he provides them with tedious entertainment and titillation, and all he asks in return is their compliance. Such is the mind control they are under, that many people believe that an existence based on how much one owns, and what one 'does' for a living, is the be-all and end-all of reality. Plato wrote of the people who see shadows reflected on the wall of a cave, and never for a moment consider that reality is much more than is glimpsed in the shadows, or even less, that the true reality which lies outside the cave. Such it is with the people who view life in purely materialistic terms. It gives them pain to be exposed to the truth, so they just shut down and close their minds further; ridiculing all who point to the fact that what they perceive is but a crafted impression of reality, and one which exists to aid the agenda of the hidden elite. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

In the Soviet Union, Collectivisation resulted in the death from starvation of over 20 million people. People who questioned the Khazar government's policy of Collectivisation were labelled by State psychiatrists as mentally ill, and paranoid. In the 'West' this policy of silencing free thought, by labelling as mad those who object to the deeds of the establishment, is just as prevalent as the use of Psychiatry in the days of the USSR. The difference is that the commissars of political correctness are more subtle than their ideological brothers were. The condemnation and humiliation is issued not solely through the legal-medical apparatus, but most commonly through the entertainment media. Soap operas and children's TV programmes are the favoured tools of the brain washers.  In Plato's Cave, the people watched their own shadows.  In the new politicised era, the people watch the flickering television images which are further removed from reality than the shadows cast by the fire; at least in Plato's allegory, the shadows were not directed to control the minds of those who watched them.

If we are to be free, we must first free our minds.  Television is one of the most powerful weapons of our enemies.  Far too many people believe that it is possible to watch a variety of television programmes and thus achieve a balanced view of the world.  In the UK, all programming is subject to government censorship, thus even the most scandalous exposures of State wrong-doings have first passed through the control mechanism of the State before being aired.  Those who believe they can balance the Marxist social engineering of the BBC by watching the Capitalist soft-porn of Channel 5, are seriously deluded.  All channels in the UK are subject to the censor, and not just the State propaganda broadcaster.  The Television schedule is referred to as 'programming' because that is exactly what it is; and it is the people who are being programmed.

To achieve freedom we must remove the hypnotic power of the media.  We must research the fraudulent banking system with its equally fraudulent Stock Market, and detach ourselves from any allegiance to the twin headed dæmon of Capitalism and Communism.  We must take a step back from all we have learnt in school, or have come to accept as restricted due to the enemy's legal system.  We must take charge of our own existence, and have the courage to walk away from what appears to be the unchangeable reality of politics and economics, and thus forge our own way free from the stranglehold of the hidden rulers.  And, when we have grasped the fact that everything we have been taught is a lie, then, and only then, may we be ready to dare to peek outside the cave which we have come to view as the sum of reality.  But that is another issue altogether!  The first step to freedom is breaking free from the grip of fear of ridicule and the unfamiliar.  By freeing ourselves, we weaken our enemies, and strike out on the path to an existence outside their control.  Freedom comes from within.

Syria and the Lebanon: Targets of Turko-Israeli expansion

When one thinks of Zionism, one automatically thinks of Israel.  Zion is an alternative name for Jerusalem, and so it is only natural to focus upon the regime which controls the physical territory of Jerusalem; natural, but overly simplistic.

There is more than one Zionist state.  Israel is a focal point for Zionism by virtue of its population sharing the same genetic stream as the Elders of Zion.  However, the nearby countries of Saudi Arabia and Turkey are also a part of the Zionist nexus.

The Lebanon has long been a target of Zionist expansion.  The current eruption of violence within the borders of the Lebanon is a part of the long term destabilisation of the country.  The long-term objective is, as Binyamin Netanyahu stated, to wipe the Lebanon off the map.  Isn't it interesting that Bibi can openly state his desire to annihilate an entire country (whilst systematically occupying every inch of another) and no one says a word?  Yet if anyone dares to state that the occupants of ersatz Israel should move back to Khazaria or on to Birobidjan, then accusations of anti-Semitism abound, and dawn raids by the gboys in blue are sure to follow.

The Lebanon and Syria form a united bloc in defence against Zionist imperialism.  The onslaught on Syria by NATO and its Al Qaeda terrorists is an attempt to knock out a country which has stood defiantly against Israeli aggression for decades.  The Israeli imperialists were driven out of the Lebanon by Syrian might, in their only unsuccessful war of conquest.  The Zionists have never forgotten the bloody nose meted out by Syria.  Israel still occupies the Golan Heights, and even includes the Syrian territory on its tourist maps of Israel.  The long term objective is for all of Syria and the Lebanon to be incorporated into Israel.  Presumably, the population of those two countries will be subjected to the ethnic cleansing and degradation which is all too familiar to the people of Palestine.  Sycophantic Zionists refer to Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East, and the only country which desires peace.  This is beyond chutzpah.  The only 'peace' Israel desires, is a 'piece' of Iraq, a 'piece' of Egypt, and very large 'pieces' of its other neighbours.

According to the fantasists in Israel, and their Judæo-Christian followers, the Jews are a 'special' people chosen by God to rule over humanity, and they have been promised a huge swathe of land which includes all of Palestine, the Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and parts of Iraq et al.  This territory extends to include the land to the west of the middle east in Europe and Africa.  If anyone else had fantasies about an invisible man promising them ownership of the world, they would be medicated and put in a special hospitable with padded walls to bounce off.  For reasons which escape any rational explanation, when such lunacy is expressed by people who call themselves Jews (in spite of being Turkic in origin and in no way connected to the ancient Hebrews), it is looked upon as righteous wisdom.  The utterances of the Zionists and their Talmudic controllers are the words of people who are dangerously deluded; these psychopaths should be isolated from the rest of humanity, but instead, by virtue of exploiting the greed and selfishness of the rest of us, they run the world!  This is beyond scary.

In addition to Israel, the Zionists control Saudi Arabia and Turkey.  They have their people in power in the USA and EU (including the UK), but the real Zionist states remain the aforementioned three in Asia Minor.  It is all too easy to mock the befuddled kosher ones, but sadly they have real power, and as the people of Syria and the Lebanon fully appreciate, they are more than willing to use it.  

Syria, so claim the raving racists of Zion, belongs to the Jews because the Big Invisible Jew in the Sky says it does.  The Zionist land of Turkey, which was carved out of the Ottoman Empire by the homosexual Jew, Kemal Ataturk, is eager to expand into Iraq and northern Syria, where it will dovetail with Israel expanding northwards.  Purely by coincidence - (of course) - the land coveted by Turkey reaches to the exact frontier of the promised land of Israel.  Syria as well as the Lebanon, are ear-marked for eradication.  To the east of Israel, the third Zionist State, Saudi Arabia is eagerly gobbling up all the smaller countries in the Arabian Peninsula, and by so doing creating an eastern border which mirrors the Talmudic fantasy.

Surely of course, none of this can come to pass?  Well, with a Jew as President of the USA, the military support for such an operation is in place.  Because Barack Obama is tanned, he has been described as an African-American.  According to the Jewish Law of Return, it doesn't matter what one's father is, it is only the gene pool of the mother which counts.  Does anyone call the Rothschild banking family White Europeans by virtue of their skin colour?  No, they are clearly identified as Jews.  Obama may have a darker pigmentation than the likes of George Soros (who incidentally has yet again profitted from insider trading,), Larry Silverstein, Rupert Murdoch, David Cameron, François Hollande, Ed Milliband etc etc ad nauseum, but he is of the same tribe.  Obama is no more Black, than the above mentioned are White; he, like the rest of them, is a Jew.

Syria will be destroyed unless the cowering Goyim stand up and stop the aggressive and terrorist war being waged by the USA, NATO and their collaborators.  If Syria falls, then the so-called Promised Land will become a geographical reality.  Pandering to lunatics by giving them what the voices in their heads tell them they should have, only reinforces their delusions and encourages them to become even more detached from reality.  

If the geographical 'completion' of Israel comes to pass, then the next logical step is for the rule of Zion over the rest of humanity, with the Israeli superstate as the hub of the New Global Jewish Empire.  In that New World Order, non-Jews will be slaves.  Even if one does not support Assad ideologically, he is an ally against our own enslavement.  For the sake of humanity, the Zionist trinity and its global support network must be overthrown.

Standing by Syria is not a matter of supporting Assad, but of opposing the 'New World Order'.  In this case, our enemies enemy IS our friend.  All who treasure freedom for themselves must appreciate that the only guarantee for our freedom is for the freedom of every nation to be protected.  In the case of the nations in the Middle East, it is vital that the parasite state of Israel is disbanded, and the Israeli population relocated to the Real Jewish State, Birobidjan.  There they can indulge in their mumbo jumbo until the end of time, or until their lunatic ideology leads to their own demise (through natural and strictly internal means).  In a free world, even Judaism has its place - but in complete isolation from any other nation or culture so that its poison can only harm those who cling to it.  Maybe in a free world, in time the Jews could abandon their insane beliefs and become good neighbours to humanity?  That, of course, remains to be seen.

Jews are Special - Jews are Chosen. (Fetch the sick bucket)

I have been accused of being obsessed with the Jewish question.  It seems I am not alone.  I have been accused of spreading falsehoods about the disproportionate power of the Jews, yet in the following video, a JEW states exactly what I, and others, have written and said.  Is he an anti-Semite?  Or is it only when the Goyim tell the truth about the Jews that it is a crime?  If the words spoken by this gloating Jew were spoken at a non-Jewish gathering, the Thought Police would soon be kicking down the doors and breaking skulls.  But then, the only Police likely to be at the meeting of the self-congratulatory supremacist bigot in the video, would have been the ones dispatched to ensure his right to spew his supremacist nonsense.  Free Speech is the reserve of the self-Chosen, who in our Orwellian dystopia are truly more equal than others...

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/LtRucAPc1AE

Greek demonstrators attack the heart of the beast

As Bankia struggles to keep the Spanish people from withdrawing their money from the part-nationalised bank, the people of Greece have taken a more direct approach to shewing their lack of support for the usurers who have destroyed their economy.  Rather than just emptying the vaults of the fiat currency, Greek demonstrators have emptied the streets of the banks themselves!

Direct Link to video: http://youtu.be/oIVdnKc1BDI

Bravo to the people of Greece for attacking the real enemy. It is noteworthy that the so-called Black Bloc Anarchists (undercover police agents provocateur) attack private businesses but never the usurers.  Whilst I couldn't possibly advocate the physical destruction of the temples of Mammon, I cannot but smile at the rightful assault against the real enemy.  Kudos to the genuine spirit of European Resistance.

Open Reply to those who hate Ratko Mladić: an appeal to a sane understanding of national identity

I recently wrote an article explaining why the trial of Ratko Mladić was an act of despotism, and how the Srebrenica Massacre did not really happen.  In response, I received the following comment from an anonymous reader:

Dear Rufus,

You owe me 5 minutes of my irreplaceable and precious life. The time I spent reading the utterly delusional garbage that you have written.

I thought “what the hell, let’s hear out what a Rat-lover has to say”. But, you have nothing to say. Nothing to reveal, other than your fantasies, paranoia and self-deception. Just like the Nazis. They were always the wronged, the persecuted, and there was no difference between truth and non-truth. The way you speak of swapping whole communities for your imagined “ethnically-pure” Serb paradise gives the game away, but you are too ignorant to fathom the stomach-churning nature of what you say.

Please present yourself to the nearest psychiatric asylum, or better still, to the nearest zoo, as an exhibit of a quasi-human monster, spewing venom with each breath. You and your kind belong behind thick bars and long walls, just like your “heroes” Rat Mladic, Milosevic, Karadzik, Hitler, ...

OK, anonymous.  You have read the article, and you still believe that Ratko Mladić is the devil himself.  Presented with copious links to prove that the Srebrenica Massacre was a media circus, and that the images of corpses were in fact those of soldiers killed in the fighting between the different sides in the Bosnian conflict, you still believe the official kosher stories of the media.  You probably believe that Osama Bin Laden directed the destruction of the World Trade Centre using hijacked æroplanes, and you probably believe that the 6 million Jews who emigrated into the USA and Israel (and other places) did so after being gassed to death and resurrected (in some instances having been gassed to death several times, according to their testimony in the Nürnberg Trials).  It is your right to believe what you like, and if the evidence disputes your view of the world, you are entitled to ignore it.

I wonder, anonymous, are you a fan of the international Slave State being built for all of us?

If you are, then you will naturally love the idea of multi-culturalism, and Materialism as God.  If you aren't, then you will appreciate that the only defence against internationalism is national sovereignty.  In no place in the article did I gloat over the deaths of the Muslims in Yugoslavia.  If you read the article with an open mind, you would have noticed that I applauded the proposed relocation of Serbs into their heartland in exchange for Muslims into central Bosnia.  If this relocation had been allowed, many more people (Serb and Muslim) would have survived the war.  The refusal to allow the population transfers caused more misery than it would have averted. 

You say that you find the idea of an ethnically-pure Serbia stomach churning?  Why exactly is this?  What is wrong with a nation living together in its own land where it can grow naturally?  What is wrong with eliminating ethnic hatred before it has the chance to take root? Why do you believe that people must be forced to share territory with people with whom they have nothing in common?

I oppose internationalism and imperialism.  In reality, they are one and the same thing.  Internationalism envisions a single global authority, with all people being 'citizens of the world'.  It sounds quite a nice idea, until one realises that in order to achieve this cuddly cosy global system, all manifestations of difference must be obliterated.  There is another word for multi-culturalism and internationalism; that word is Genocide.

The one-worlders do not wish to create single global governance out of love of the people.  Rather they seek to reduce the people to identity-less producer-consumers who they can more easily exploit - they want to create a global plantation, and you, as much as I, will be nothing but a slave.  It may surprise you to know that I have friends of all cultures and ethnicities.  I enjoy deep discussions with people from other cultures and faiths.  If the one worlders have their way, there will be no such discussions, as there will be no Arabs, Africans, Latin Americans, Orientals etc; there will be no Islam, Christianity, Hinduism. 

For all its ill, in its own territorial space, if it can be kept away from attempts to put into practice its supremacist fantasies, even Judaism has a right to exist unmolested.  The dominance of Talmudism in the drive to an international order does not mean that opposition to internationalism goes hand-in-glove with a desire to exterminate the Jews!  Rather, opposition to internationalism means an opposition to the dominance of anyone over anyone else.  In order for this to be achieved, the integrity of all nations must be protected

Internationalism is the imperialism of finance.  The lies against Ratko Mladić are a part of the agenda for the abolition of Nations, Cultures, Religions, Tradition, and everything which makes us human.  People who love their kin are slandered as 'haters' who seek to exterminate everyone else.  The exact opposite is the case.  Those who love their own - really love their own - understand the characteristics which make a nation a thing of beauty.  When one fully appreciates that in one's own people, one begins to appreciate the qualities inherent in other peoples.  Not wishing for ones own kind to be lost in a mass of indistinguishable drones is only a part of the struggle against internationalism; the protection of every ethnicity and culture is the other part.  

As I have said, I enjoy meeting with peoples of diverse origins.  In a free world, human contact will become more fulfilling as we can meet other people as we travel to visit their homelands.  I like my friends, but I do not wish them to live in my house or to have sex with my wife!  My friends enjoy my company, and when it is time for me to return home, I do not think for a moment that they wish me harm.  Guests are welcome when one knows that they are only visiting; when they become squatters, and demand that the host turns himself into a servant to their every need (and pays for the privilege), then there are problems.

Your paragraph advising me to go to a Zoo for observation is very amusing.  However, aren't you worried that this will allow me a Platform to speak my anti-international heresy?  Or will you screen anyone who visits the Zoo for anti-internationalist traits?  Perhaps all you capture could then be re-educated, and should that fail, be shot like the filthy Kulaks we are?

You list my heroes, but obviously, this is a knee-jerk reaction.  If you click on the label, 'Hitler', you will find an opinion which is somewhat less than hero worship.  Hitler's anti-Slavic policies and his imperialistic expansion into Russia are as unacceptable as the Zionist drive to eliminate the distinct peoples of the world.  If you can bring yourself to spend another 5 minutes reading this blog, you may find the material on Hitler interesting.

It is comical that the commentator who responded to my article seems to believe that thoughts such as mine should be censored.  I believe in absolute freedom of speech, which is far more than those who have consumed the toxins of multi-culturalism and political correctness do. 

I appreciate all feedback, and I do try to respond, but I don't always get the opportunity.  If you wish to debate this (or any other) issue further, please join the Forum.  That goes for everyone.  If, anonymous, you sincerely believe I must be medicated so that I can enjoy your rosy view of the coming New World Order, then perhaps you need to look at what you are ingesting, and try seeing the world as it is; warts and all.

Oh, and if you are wondering why the image of the Swiss Flag at the top of the article, this is because the multi-cultists wish to abolish it as it 'offends' the new-comers to Switzerland.  Now the unwelcome over-staying guests want the Swiss to tend to their every need and to change the emblem of their country.  Wouldn't relocating these malcontents now be preferable to the destruction of Switzerland?  Or does the mind that loves to hate all defence of individual nations, and believes the ridiculous lies against Ratko Mladić, find it unacceptable that anyone question the destructive march of internationalism?

BBC: Trotskyite propaganda machine

BBC Radio 5 is the perfect tonic for people suffering with low blood pressure, but doesn't aid the health of the British people as a whole.  On the Nicky Campbell programme this morning, the national deficit was discussed in the light of the election of President Hollande in France.  As if the people of the UK are not aware of just how biased the BBC is, one of the invited guests on the programme was none other than an official of the Socialist Workers Party.

The Trotskyite SWP officer, of course, blamed 'the rich' for all the ills of society, but failed to mention that the parasitic rich who are destroying our country, are not members of the indigenous population.  The Bankers were ignored, and instead tax-dodging multi-nationals were blamed for all our woes.  The whole crux of the SWP argument was for increased taxation at the highest earning level.  As one has come to expect of the BBC, the SWP viewpoint was given vast amounts of airtime, but the real solutions to capitalism were not even addressed.

A listener rang in to point out that the SWP are Trotskyite and that their ideology is responsible for over 100 million deaths in the last century alone.  When a second caller rang in with the same point, Nicky Campbell laughed off the deaths of a staggering number of people, and stated that the debate was about austerity, and not the minutiæ of Trotskyism!

Imagine for one moment that a caller rang into the BBC to discuss the fact that the Banking cabal is Jewish, and that the solution to Capitalism is the abolition of the monetary system which sees money borrowed into existence as debt owed to the international bankers, rather than created as credit by the State, and - which is most important - to remove usury and all Judaic economics from our country?  The BBC would shriek hysterically that correctly identifying the monetary problem and its solution was 'racist', 'anti-Semitic' and 'right-wing extremist'.  The caller would be blocked from accessing airtime, and would most certainly not be invited to contribute in the role of an expert on economics (which is what the SWP member was referred to as this morning).  The No Platform policy of the BBC would probably be extended to reporting the caller for thought crimes and having him or her arrested by the politicised police for incitement to racial/religious hatred!

The BBC routinely describes anyone who doesn't agree with its Trotskyite ideology as a far right extremist, neo-Nazi or some similar label.  The BBC is the official State Broadcaster and an extension of the Establishment.  The Nicky Campbell programme was a typical example of reporting under government restrictions.  As if allowing the SWP free rein was not biased enough, another caller rang in to state that the economic problems stemmed from the debts incurred in the Second World War, and that we all had a duty to pay our share as gratitude for the fact that we are not all speaking German!  The caller was not indigenous, thus had we not fought the suicidal war, he would not be in this country in the first place to dictate to the indigenous population about how grateful we should be for the destruction of our culture in the Crusade to create Israel! The idea that we would be speaking German is ludicrous, and in any case Anglo-Saxons are Germans!

I think I will have to cut down my exposure to the BBC, unless I become diagnosed with hypotension, in which case I know that by tuning in to hear the political rantings of the Talmudic materialists, my blood pressure is guaranteed to soar.

Ratko Mladić. Serbian Hero & Victim of NATO lies.

Ratko Mladić, the heroic defender of Serbia is on trial in the Hague, for the genocide of Muslims in Srebrenica, Republika Srpska.  Ratko Mladić is not guilty of genocide; he is guilty of being a loyal Serbian who fought for his country against the international terrorists of NATO, and their paid mercenaries the former federal state of Yugoslavia.

The Srebrenica Massacre is a lie.  Ratko Mladić is being prosecuted for an event which did not happen.  Just as with the great Serbian patriot, Slobodan Milošević, who was murdered by the US military before he could expose the lies of the US government, it is highly likely that anyone who comes forward to defend Mladić will be slain by the butchers of the US-UK-NATO Axis of Evil.

The trial of Ratko Mladić is being compared to the Nürnberg Trials of the defeated Germans after 1945.  This comparison is valid, as in the show trials of the defeated Germans, the 'War crimes' they were accused of were pure propaganda fantasy, and the very real war crimes against the people of Europe, (such as the Hamburg and Dresden holocausts (massacres by fire-bombing) and the Berlin mass-rapes and massacre (by advancing east-Asian Red Army soldiers)), were ignored.  Such it is with the trial of Ratko Mladić, who is accused of non-crimes, whilst the real crimes of the Bosniaks and their NATO-UK-US sponsors, are ignored.

In the 22/6/98 edition of the Bosnian Muslim newspaper, Dani, an interview with Bosnian SDP President, Hakija Meholjic, records the following statement:

...(at the time of the Bosniak Convention) We were received there by President Izetbegovic, and immediately after the welcome he asked us: "What do you think about the swap of Srebrenica for Vogosca [a Sarajevo suburb]?" There was a silence for a while and then I said: "Mr. President, if this is a done thing, then you should not have invited us here, because we have to return and face the people and personally accept the burden of that decision." Then he (Izetbegovic) said:  "You know, I was offered by Clinton in April 1993 (after the fall of Cerska and Konjevic Polje) that the Chetnik (Bosnian Serb) forces enter Srebrenica, carry out a slaughter of 5,000 Muslims, and then there will be a military intervention."  Our delegation was composed of nine people, one among us was from Bratunac and unfortunately he is the only one not alive now, but all the others from the delegation are alive and can confirm this. 

(Source: http://www.ex-yupress.com/dani/dani2.html)

The Bosniak leadership colluded with NATO aggressors to create the idea of a 'massacre' in Srebrenica, to justify international interference in the Yugoslavian war of cessation.  The bodies of Bosniak soldiers killed in fighting against Serbian and Croatian forces were gathered for display to create the imagery of a massacre, in order to dæmonise the Serbs in the eyes of the global public.  Ratko Mladić fought to defend his people from alien aggressors who sought to destroy Serbia.  There was no massacre at Srebrenica, although the foreign fighters recruited by the USA to fight alongside the Bosniaks, did murder many thousands of Serbian civilians in their war to occupy sovereign European soil.  Such is the way of the people we have come to know as Al Qaeda.

An Islamic writer also notes the lies of the NATO terrorists:

• Representatives of the Bosniac community gathered in Sarajevo on 28 and 29 September to vote on the peace package. A delegation of Bosniacs from Srebrenica was transported to Sarajevo by UNPROFOR [UN forces in Bosnia] helicopter to participate in the debate. Prior to the meeting, the delegation met in private with [Bosnian] President Izetbegovic, who told them that there were Serb proposals to exchange Srebrenica and Zepa for territories around Sarajevo. The delegation opposed the idea, and the subject was not discussed further. Some surviving members of the Srebrenica delegation have stated that President Izetbegovic also told them he had learned that a NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina was possible, but could only occur if the Serbs were to break into Srebrenica, killing at least 5,000 of its people.  (http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/safe.htm#115)

• I know that they are now trying to humiliate people from Srebrenica and spread rumors that we supposedly did not fight and were slain while running away from Srebrenica. No one can deny that in the Srebrenica municipality there are 2,000 buried fighters. No one can deny that we set up a large free territory. However, without assistance from outside we could not hold out for long surrounded by the enemy. You can write that I absolutely support the statement by Hakija Meholjic that we were betrayed. Why does not someone refute his assertions with arguments? Instead they are using slander and saying that Hakija was like this and like that. Hakija was among the first people in Srebrenica to pick up a rifle and work on the organisation of the resistance. Therefore, he has the right to speak up. Ibran Mustafic and those women do not have the right to make lists for the Hague Tribunal. They do not have any evidence for that. In Srebrenica, Ibran refused to fight and lead a brigade, but turned to his prewar flirt with politics. As far as Hakija is concerned, you can write that every single child from Srebrenica agrees with his statement."

(Source: http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/kilibarda/islamist.htm)

The truth of the 'Srebrenica Massacre' is very different from the lies of the media.  The Serbs offered to exchange Srebrenica for the largely Muslim territories of Zepa and the vicinity of Sarajevo.  This would have allowed for the creation of a ethnically and religiously homogeneous Muslim Bosnia, bordered by ethnically homogeneous and religiously stable enlarged nations of Croatia and Serbia.  Contrary to the hysteria of the Zionist media, Albania is a largely secular nation, and although formally Islamic, Albanian women dress as ordinary Europeans.  The separation of Bosnia could have created a moderate Muslim country in the Balkans, bordered by strengthened homelands for Serbia and Croatia.  This sane and natural ideal does not fit in with the thinking of the internationalists.

Slobodan Milošević was murdered for the crime of loving his people, and desiring to keep his homeland as a united territory, with cultural and ethnic homogeneity.  Internationalism dictates that there can be no ethnically pure countries (except that of the ruling elite) and that there can be no identifiable culture other than consumerism.  Ratko Mladić's only 'crime' is that he fought for his people.  He is a true European hero who is being used as an example to silence all who oppose the international order. 

The Srebrenica Massacre is pure propaganda which can easily be compared with the mass of propaganda used by the internationalists to justify their wars of economic conquest, such as:

1. German soldiers bayoneting Belgian babies and crucifying civilians in the Great War
2. Holyhoax lies of mobile (and shower-room) gas chambers, electrocution swimming baths, shrunken heads, human skin-lampshades, etc
3. The Gulf War fable of Iraqi soldiers taking Kuwaiti babies from incubators and allowing them to die
4. Osama Bin Laden's destruction of the World Trade Centre with thermite, sorry hijacked æroplanes (used to justify invading Afghanistan, home to his enemies, the Taliban)
5. The Gulf War II, Weapons of Mass Destruction fiction
6. The wholly made-up Benghazi Massacre in Libya
7. Syrian government 'oppression' of 'rebels' (war of survival against foreign-owned terrorists)
8. Nuclear-bomb seeking Iran

 is another patriot who is being persecuted by the Courts of the real International War Criminals.  He is a hero and deserves the support of everyone who cherishes freedom.  The real War Criminals in the tragedy of the destruction of Bosnian Serbia are Bill Clinton and all the leaders of the USA, UK, EU and NATO who supported the aggression against a proud European nation.  It is the traitors in Belgrade who delivered Slobodan Milošević, Ratko Mladić and other Serbian patriots to the international despots in the Hague, as well as the likes of Clinton (and his wife, the butcher of Libya), who deserve to be punished for crimes against humanity.  Unfortunately they own the international courts, and so they will never be tried under their own international law.  One would hope that the Clintons, Tony Blair, William Hague, Obama, and the many, many, other terrorist leaders walking freely around the world will be dealt with by natural justice.  They cannot rely on their security 24/7 and hopefully one day they will reap what they have sewn.

An article detailing the main sources of the Srebrenica propaganda can be found at http://www.beoforum.rs/dokumenti/Six-Sources-of-the-Srebrenica-Legend.pdf 

God Bless Ratko Mladić, defender of Serbia, and true European hero.