The 'Truth Movement is riddled with dis-info agents. Charlie Veitch, founder of the Love Police, is the latest leader to push the propaganda of the Establishment. In April, Veitch was arrested for planning to use the wedding of an empty headed Talmudist to a fellow Zionist creep in the Windsor clan, to highlight the sheer evil of the British State. Prior to his arrest, Veitch had become a high profile figure in what became termed the Anarchist faction of the truth movement. As a member of a banking family, Veitch was seen as a symbol of hope, in that he appeared to be an insider who had rejected internationalism and finance imperialism. Then to the horror of many, he made a public statement endorsing the Establishment fable that 9/11 was the work of Muslim extremists and therefore all that followed was justifiable.
The question many are asking is whether Veitch was always a snide, or was he coerced into betraying the anti-internationalist resistance movement during his interrogation at the time of the Windsor wedding? Could it be that his outrageous assertions that the Twin Towers really dis burn to dust, are his way of letting people know that he is acting against his will? One would hope so.
The turn-coat behaviour of Veitch highlights the importance of self-reliance amongst activists. Will people be so disheartened by Veitch's defection that they will stop resisting the tyranny of the One Worlders? Surely that is one of the goals of the Establishment. The general reaction to Veitch's betrayal appears to be disgust, not despondency. It seems the Establishment have failed.
On his youtube page, Zak Locke has questioned the validity of leaderless resistance. Zak has contributed to the Truth Movement by the distribution of a considerable number of documentaries exposing many of the facets of the international cabal. He has also been instrumental in getting key speakers to address audiences in the UK. His despair is understandable, but he has contributed of his own volition to the awakening of many people. He hasn't needed leaders to tell him what to do.
Leaderless Resistance isn't perfect, but it is preferable to following an individual who can be manipulated by our enemies. We need to take confidence in our own abilities. We have reached this point in history by following those who present themselves as our saviours but are in fact deceivers. The Fabian model of the Wolf in Sheep's Clothing has had profound success. We don't need shepherds. We need an army of individuals with the strength to keep fighting and to lead by example; an army of individuals who are fully awake to the reality around us.
The problem with Leaders is that they can take their followers down blind alleys, and entrance them with illusions equally as dangerous as those of the Establishment; they can put their followers back to sleep. Look at the likes of Ron Paul, Alex Jones and Jordon Maxwell - have they not misdirected those who have unquestioningly accepted their message?
We all make mistakes. Those who put themselves up as leaders, pass those mistakes on to those who follow. If when corrected, they continue pushing the same message, then their motives must be questioned. We have free will; we can research the truth ourselves; we can distribute information exposing the lies of the opposition and the enemy within. All we need is the self confidence to do so.
Zak makes a cogent argument for organisation. Cooperation is certainly needed, but leaders? I would have to disagree.
The treachery of Veitch is no real setback. It is an irritation; nothing more. We can learn from this episode, not to put too much faith in any individual. Let Veitch make his appearance on the BBC. The Establishment is a lie machine which no one with any understanding trusts.
For those who are interested, you can find more on Veitch HERE.
The question many are asking is whether Veitch was always a snide, or was he coerced into betraying the anti-internationalist resistance movement during his interrogation at the time of the Windsor wedding? Could it be that his outrageous assertions that the Twin Towers really dis burn to dust, are his way of letting people know that he is acting against his will? One would hope so.
The turn-coat behaviour of Veitch highlights the importance of self-reliance amongst activists. Will people be so disheartened by Veitch's defection that they will stop resisting the tyranny of the One Worlders? Surely that is one of the goals of the Establishment. The general reaction to Veitch's betrayal appears to be disgust, not despondency. It seems the Establishment have failed.
On his youtube page, Zak Locke has questioned the validity of leaderless resistance. Zak has contributed to the Truth Movement by the distribution of a considerable number of documentaries exposing many of the facets of the international cabal. He has also been instrumental in getting key speakers to address audiences in the UK. His despair is understandable, but he has contributed of his own volition to the awakening of many people. He hasn't needed leaders to tell him what to do.
Leaderless Resistance isn't perfect, but it is preferable to following an individual who can be manipulated by our enemies. We need to take confidence in our own abilities. We have reached this point in history by following those who present themselves as our saviours but are in fact deceivers. The Fabian model of the Wolf in Sheep's Clothing has had profound success. We don't need shepherds. We need an army of individuals with the strength to keep fighting and to lead by example; an army of individuals who are fully awake to the reality around us.
The problem with Leaders is that they can take their followers down blind alleys, and entrance them with illusions equally as dangerous as those of the Establishment; they can put their followers back to sleep. Look at the likes of Ron Paul, Alex Jones and Jordon Maxwell - have they not misdirected those who have unquestioningly accepted their message?
We all make mistakes. Those who put themselves up as leaders, pass those mistakes on to those who follow. If when corrected, they continue pushing the same message, then their motives must be questioned. We have free will; we can research the truth ourselves; we can distribute information exposing the lies of the opposition and the enemy within. All we need is the self confidence to do so.
Zak makes a cogent argument for organisation. Cooperation is certainly needed, but leaders? I would have to disagree.
The treachery of Veitch is no real setback. It is an irritation; nothing more. We can learn from this episode, not to put too much faith in any individual. Let Veitch make his appearance on the BBC. The Establishment is a lie machine which no one with any understanding trusts.
For those who are interested, you can find more on Veitch HERE.
1 comment:
The key point as you alluded to briefly in your post is: Free Will.
Each and every individual has Free Will, it is each and every individual who either rakes a conscious decision to use it or not.
Our battle means that as heretics we are of necessity of stronger resolve than the sheeple and therefore if we are genuine we do not need to gather ourselves together in groups, the mere fact that we are aware that there are others who are also preaching 'heresy' is enough of an encouragement.
It is perhaps cruel to point out but it is a truth nevertheless that 90% of our people are gutless and are happy to wallow in their ignorance if it means easy life. We will however make the breakthrough and when it happens then woe betide those who stand in our way because where we lead the people will indeed follow!
Post a Comment