The lies of the NATO Axis of Evil are exposed every day. We were told that Libyan soldiers were using Viagra to help them rape civilians - this story highlights the sick minds of the enemies of humanity. Libyan soldiers are not raping civilians, but Al-CIAda mercenaries are beheading and torturing loyal Libyans as a terrorist weapon. The Establishment media push the lies of their propaganda masters, but hide the truth.
The massive demonstration in support of the Libyan system of government will not be shown on FOX, CNN, BBC or any of the other lie factories. The people of Libya do not want to be saved from their freedom and turned into serfs of international finance. It is insanity to believe such rubbish.
Many of the 'rebels' who were conned into supporting the internationalist plot to replace Libyan rule with international corporate rule, are now awake to the imperialist agenda of NATO. For this reason, many are returning to the Libyan fold. Far from being a tyrant, Qaddafi has been magnanimous in granting amnesty to those who made errors in judgement. The reaction of NATO to the Libyan people opting to keep control of their own nation has been to attack and murder columns of Libyans who have rejected the poisoned chalice of Western 'freedom' (serfdom). As well as murdering loyal Libyans in Tripoli, NATO are now murdering their erstwhile allies. Only the fanatics of Al-CIAda remain, but as the hired gun of London-Washington this is to be expected.
The Axis of Evil lied in the past about Weapons of Mass Destruction in order to take control of Iraq and murder the beloved leader of the Iraqi nation, Saddam Hussein. Now they are claiming that the Syrian State is murdering protesters in order to occupy Syria and murder President Sadat. In Libya they are selling vicious propaganda lies about civilians being raped and murdered by the State. In all three nations these stories are evil lies.
In an interview with Russia Today, Muammar Al-Qaddafi's son, Saif Al-Islam, stated
“The Libyans are united not just around my father as a leader but they are united around other moral values. They are fighting for their country, for their people. They know that NATO is here and is bombing not because they want to help us, or because it is so nice to us or because it is so generous towards the Libyan people, but because they have their own interest. And the rebels are with NATO not because they are pro-democracy or fighting for freedom. It has nothing to do with this. They have their own interests. They want to share the cake – they want to share this country.”
Exactly! If Qaddafi really was a tyrant, the people of his country would not turn out en masse to show support for the system he established. We hear tales of African mercenaries being paid to prop up the regime. This is more propaganda. The volunteers from across Africa and overseas who have come to the aid of Libya are motivated by love of an idea - and that idea is freedom. It is NATO which is motivated by no higher ideal than money. It is NATO which employs terrorists and murders men, women and children indiscriminately as a means of enforcing its despotic will. The Libyans are fighting for their way of life, against the inhuman materialism of international finance.
Anyone with a soul, a conscience, and a sense of human decency will oppose this war and lobby for the prosecution of the War Criminals directing this atrocity - Sarkozy, Cameron, Berlusconi and Obama. Those who support NATO deserve the same treatment as is being meted out to the victims of the cowards in the skies.
For a useful list of material on the internationalist criminals, visit ICPO.org, HERE
7 comments:
Why do you not highlight how Gadaffi ensures that the citizens of Tripoli are recipients of 'his riches' (Libya's) because only Tripoli counts when you consider the population/land mass of that country.
Gadaffi has betrayed his own revolution.
And it does make one wonder why exactly you are such a sycophant, were you a part of the Loony Front/aware that the Loony Front had a deal with the WRP to sell copies of the Green Book?
Qadaffi tried to unite all Libya. Where he came unstuck was that factions of Arabs objected to his pan-African ideology which necessitated equality with Black Africans.
I'm not a sycophant. I have a copy of the Green Book and it makes a lot of sense. As for the Loony Front, that had dissolved by the time I became active in politics. Derek Holland's Political Soldier ideal, especially the Cadre Principle, has advanced patriotic thinking. Nationalism was stuck in a right-wing dead end. Salvation for the nation can only come through a strategy which goes beyond the false left-right masonic dichotomy.
The Third Way which termed itself the Radical Centre was really a wishy washy libertine movement. The ENM had great poterntial. When Troy transformed the ENM into the NRF, that faction (no pun intended) started to go a bit pear-shaped. I met Richard Hunt from Alternative Green and was less than impressed. As for New Right and the NAM, I have heard good things about the former, but nothing of the latter. I think his best work is with H.E.R.R!
That leaves only the ITP. Ideologically it was sound. I wasn't aware of the WRP deal, but I can understand approachesd being made to the Left. Sadly it is the self-style Left which is the problem with its 'no platform' nonsense. How can co-operation be achieved with people who refuse to talk to anyone who doesn't have a worldview which fits into what they consider politically correct?
We are facing extinction and perpetual serfdom yet people with the potential to organise a realistic resistance to our common enemy refuse to talk to others outside their manufactured safety net! Sad indeed.
You make the point that Qadaffi tried to 'unite all of Libya' hmmm, Libya has always been 'united' as far as a union of disparate tribes can be, even under the rule of the Italians!
It is true nonetheless that for a revolution to be constant it needs to be freshened up constantly and that means a constant change of leadership to maintain the forward push/invigoration.
The WRP were the only ones who were given the rights to distribute the Green Book, it was a cahp in Australia, it will be no surprise if you are au fait with Patsy Harrington that he would be comfortable in dealing with Marxists as he also is/was very closely allied with Red Action.
I met Pat only once but the afternoon I spent talking to him was enough for me to come to the conclusion that his time with the Young Communists had been damaging. His Third Way party wasn't so much Radical Centre, as Liberal Extremist.
If you've read the manifesto, you'll know the Third Way was pro-homosexual and multi-culti (albeit couched in different terms). He boasted of how proud he was that he had committee members who had absolutely no connection with the Political Soldier years. He was equally proud of his association with Rabbi Schiller - a Khazar Talmudist who claims to be anti-Zionist but nonetheless believes in Jewish racial supremacy! It would surprise me if he wasn't still tied in with Red Action. He has the air of an SWP student. Sorry Pat, but you do!
You make an interesting point about the need for constant change to invigorate the revolution. Anything less would mean stagnation. I'd have to agree on that one. Your allusion to Il Duce makes me smile. Now there was a system for rule in Libya worth its salt!
It is a truth that the father of the revolution needs to hand over to the children (Libyans, not his own bloodline!).
Griffo must have learnt from Gadaffi the means to reconcile his power, the people can have as many peoples committee's as they want but, if the head remains the real power broker without means to oust him then it is nothing less than tyranny.
Qadaffi is the titular head only. If you want to look at a nation which has a tyrant as Head of State (a tyrant with real power), look no further than the UK. The Windsor clan are the most bloodthirsty beasts the world has ever seen; they make Genghis Khan look like a philanthropist. At least the Khans advanced their people, unlike the Windsors who only work to advance Talmudists. Having said that, the Windsors are not real Europeans and would be better off living as Monarchs of Israel with their real kin.
Regarding Nick Griffin, I don't see any value in contributing to the discord in the BNP. My only interest in Griffin is in how he performs in Parliament. From what I've seen so far, my EMP isn't doing that bad a job! I leave the muck-raking to disaffected members of the BNP and to those on the outside who oppose it. I can see no good coming from undermining the patriotic organisations in the UK with democratically elected members, whether BNP or UKIP.
This post is Libya specific so to draw the situation as it is in the UK is rather disingenious.
The fact remains that the Green Wog is not 'just a titular' head, he has the first and last say-so on EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING, he has also taken advantage of the opportunity for him to practice a little nepotism.
Post a Comment