Saturday, 30 July 2011

San Francisco: Cabbalist Circumcision & Coprophilic Paradise

Talmudism is alive and well in San Francisco. The hotbed of decadence has added to its notoriety by becoming the first City in the USA to make the genital mutilation of infant boys a 'right'.

Using the excuse that responsibility for the regulation of medical procedures rests with the State of California and not with individual cities, Judge Loretta Giorgi ordered that the forthcoming November plebiscite for the outlawing of circumcision for under children under the age of 18 be halted.

The USA boasts that it is a democracy, and that the world looks to it for inspiration for this reason. How democratic is it that a judge can unilaterally stop a vote on an issue affecting the mental and physical well-being of infants? It is hardly fitting for a nation which ceaselessly wages war in order to give 'democracy' to people the world over, to centralise decision-making and stifle dissent due to contrived technicalities. The great advocates of human freedom in Washington DC are prepared to kill substantial numbers of people in their own countries in order to enlighten them to the benefits of joining the international order. Could it be that democracy is for export only? Or maybe it is a complete illusion and does not benefit even the most bombed and butchered nations who have come to the attention of the elected dictators on the Potomac?

The Judge cited the extent of circumcision across the USA as reason enough to deny attempts to limit it. By that reasoning, people should be free to engage in any practices they wish - so long as they meet the quantitative criteria of the legal system.

Profiteer of unnecessary surgery on demand, Doctor Brian McBeth made a statement supporting the Judge's decision to keep the law out of areas of personal choice. Obviously, Dr McBeth has a sense of humour - possibly his happy disposition is bolstered by his ill-gotten wealth. I wonder if he would support the parents' right to choose whether to vaccinate, and by not doing to not fund his bank account?

The shining light of freedom known as the ADL (Anti Democratic League), crowed about the Judge's refusal to allow the people to decide for themselves whether to protect innocent children from superstitious butchery. Associate regional dictator, Nancy Appel, issued a statement to the press, saying:

"The Court has rightly upheld the freedom for Jews and Muslims in San Francisco to choose to circumcise their children in accordance with long-standing religious tradition."

This is the truth of the decision. The Judge has no interest in upholding the rights of children, or in upholding the democratic process.

Female Circumcision is condemned in the USA but Male Circumcision is protected by law. Why the difference? Female genital mutilation occurs mainly in Black African nations to appease the diabolical deities of their insane superstitious drivel; Male genital mutilation is practiced by Luciferians who follow the Talmud and its equally sick off-shoot, the Qur'an.

Circumcision is a barbaric practice with no medical merit. In both its male and female forms it derives from archaic cults. The only reason for its continuance is financial. Whether it is tribal butchers or mohels - or money-worshipping doctors - in every nation where genital mutilation takes place, there is money to be made from human suffering.

If the USA was the bastion of democracy and human rights it purports to be, it would oppose all unnecessary surgery. However it is a cleptocracy which murders and maims for profit. The decision by Judge Giorgi to ban a vote on circumcision in order to uphold the authority of the Pharisees (Jewish and Islamic), shows exactly who runs the USA.

San Francisco welcomed Soviet dictator and KGB butcher Mikael Gorbachev, when the Talmudists replaced the one party puppet state of the USSR with the multi-party puppets of the CIS. Gorbachev immediately slotted in to the decadence of the paedophile and homosexual haven, merely swapping one CCCP for another.

It is a dark day for San Francisco and for all who do not wish to serve the Talmudic and Qu'ranic enemies of humanity. The organisers of the proposed vote have vowed to fight on.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Funny how both the 'chosen' and the bearded ones claim to uphold the Law of God by not abusing their bodies yet they will undertake circumcision which does give cause for thinking the perpetrators have paedophiliac tendencies and are unGodly.

They do say "beards and 'taches for nonces and grasses."

Anonymous said...

In the US, state laws can't abrogate federal laws. Federal law does not make circumcision illegal, so San Fran can't make it so. To compare male circumcision with FGM is like comparing a paper cut with a compound fracture. The move to prohibit male circumcision in San Fran comes mainly from the gay community: gay men just know their 'members' would be larger if it weren't for circumcision.

Anonymous said...

My wife is a nurse with the hospital and emphatically states circumcision is better hygenically. If Sanfran wants to ban it you have to wonder why. Remeber can a spring bring forth sweet and bitter water at the sametime: IE Sanfran Gov.