Indigenous rights: Why ALL occupations must be opposed

The UK media is two-faced when it comes to migration.  Understanding that the indigenous population are heartily sick of being treated as second class citizens in our own country, the media are happy to publish newspapers with headlines decrying the economic and legal impact of massive immigration.  However, turn the page, and one is bombarded with fantastic tales of the 'benefits' of multi-culturalism.  The headlines serve to make the individual part with his or her money; the rest of the paper spews forth salacious multi-culti propaganda aimed at undermining the natural sense of decency and cultural alignment which stands in opposition to internationalism and materialism.

Immigration is a weapon for the destruction of ethnically homogeneous nations.  By transferring people across the globe, the unity of the land with the people who dwell on it is broken.  When a territorial area is shared by many peoples of differing origins and cultures, it ceases to be anything other than a political entity, as defined by the legal boundaries within which it rests.  For a land to be a real living country, it must be culturally one, and ethnically distinct.  Anything less is meaningless.

The news media know that discussing the immigration statistics is good for business.  When criminals are able to claim asylum status due to a fear of being punished back home, it should come as no surprise when they resume their criminal activities in the new country of residence.  In many cases, the asylum seekers share the same proclivities as the Establishment.  Rarely does the media reflect on why it is so easy for deviants to come to the UK, or how their presence impacts upon the lives of children.

Immigrants are blamed for taking our jobs, or conversely are accused of being benefits scroungers living off the Welfare State.  Well, if they are in the country, they will either be working or claiming benefits, so this line of attack is really pointless.  If they work, they are accused of taking jobs which belong to the people, but if they don't, they are attacked for not working!  Never is the question asked as to why they are here, and who brought them here.

Many Afro-Caribbeans arrived after the intra-European tragedy of 1939-45.  They were invited to do the work which those killed and maimed could no longer do.  They could have been invited as short-term guest workers, or alternatively, the failed Capitalist system could have been abandoned.  They were brought in as permanent residents in order to remodel the UK and make it just another international territory with people who had no cultural or historical blood ties to the land.

In the 1970s, the great man of Uganda, Idi Amin, rescued his nation from the parasites who were economically raping it.  The majority of these people came from the Indian sub-continent, and should have returned to their own homelands.  Instead they were flown into the UK, to take up residence in the North, Midlands and London.  Having proven themselves to be such a danger to the host nation of Uganda that they had to be removed, why is anyone surprised that they have acted in exactly the same manner in the UK?

The Uganda Asians should have returned to the Indian sub-continent, but were brought to the UK to destabilise it.  In many areas of the UK, the Asian populations are so vast that they form self-contained colonies, with their own schools, shops, banks, businesses, residential communities, radio and television stations etc.  The local authorities have adapted to suit their needs with all council, health service and public sector literature produced in foreign languages so the colonists do have even have to learn English.  They have been recruited into the police and legal system, so it is possible that even when breaking the law, they will not come into contact with the English language.

Building a self-contained community in order to protect one's culture, traditions, religion, customs, language etc is understandable, albeit incredibly rude to the host population.  In Spain, there are communities of English speakers, but the Spanish authorities provide free Spanish lessons to all newcomers, and it is required that any dealings with the State, health service etc are in Spanish.  In the UK, translators are provided at the tax-payers expense.  Why the difference?  Because the UK Establishment are at the spearhead of the drive to a one world state, and the indigenous UK citizens are seen as the enemy.  Our culture is in retreat, our history is mocked, our language is becoming a joke.  Immigrants may be taking advantage of the situation in the UK, but it is the Establishment which have created these conditions.

It is human nature to want to be amongst ones own, and the existence of ethnically-homogeneous communities is proof that multi-culturalism doesn't work.  In the wider community, the indigenous population is bombarded with race-mixing propaganda, and the schools teach that all manner of depravity are 'lifestyle choices'.  The mass media like to blame the immigrants for acting in a sensible, if somewhat callous manner, by looking after their own.  The media never put the spotlight on the cause of the problem, only on the symptoms.  The Media are a part of the Establishment and share the same goals of reducing the UK to a swamp of incompatible peoples fighting for their share of resources.  The media relish the promotion of anti-Polish hysteria, but remain silent on issues such as the anti-human hatred taught in Synagogues.  These double standards indicate who they serve.

Whereas it is possible to find instances of immigrants behaving in a manner which is offensive to the host population, it is ridiculous to tar all immigrants with the same brush.  The media are quite happy to claim that immigrants are responsible for the job shortage, but they do not look at the fact that the population of the country has been deliberately raised through immigration, in order to create mass unemployment and thus keep wages down, and prevent demands for better employment conditions.  Likewise, we are told that we need skilled immigrants to fill the vacant positions in our health system due to insufficient numbers of indigenous people gaining the appropriate qualifications.  The abolition of free Higher Education, and the dumbing down of all State education has led to the situation where illiteracy is growing, and it is becoming difficult to obtain qualified staff.  The solution is not importing workers, but education the people already in the nation.  The media ignore this blatantly obvious fact.

Until recent time, the media completely ignored the problems associated with immigration.  The current obsession with libelling immigrants as criminals and/or the source of our financial ills, has come about with the expansion of the European Union to the frontiers of the Ukraine, Belarus and Russia.  The anti-European racism of the media can be seen in the classification of gypsies as Romanians, and the implication that the increase in thefts from people with Romanian documents is due to European dishonesty.  At the risk of being labelled racist myself, it is Gypsies who are thieves, and it is outrageous that Romanians are blamed for the innate criminality of the Gypsies who have dwelt amongst them, and now have spread their criminality to our shores.

Immigration of non-Europeans is bound to lead to the creation of colonies by people who want no part of the indigenous way of life.  At its extreme, we have the example of Israel.  Established as a land for the Jews after the Second World War, (a war of their creation), Israel is the perfect example of how incompatible peoples relate to one another.  Palestinians have lost their homes; their culture has been trampled upon; their land has been stolen; their women have been raped.  Funnily enough, these truths are ignored by the UK media.

It is ironic that it is to the greatest colonial parasite state that we must look for solutions to our own ills.  In Israel, the drive for ethnic purity has now reached the point that ex-soldiers are being trained to do jobs which non-Jews would normally do.  There are now Israeli Sushi Chefs, replacing Japanese chefs in an attempt to keep Israel for the Jews.  In the UK, it is possible to get an entry visa as a curry chef, due to it being seen as essential that the food sold in restaurants is authentic.  Thus you will not find an English chef in a Chinese restaurant, although it would be classed as racial discrimination to stop a non-indigenous chef getting the top job in an English restaurant.

Israel should not exist.  It was built on Arab land to which the Jews have no right, regardless of the superstitious nonsense taught in Churches, about the 'Chosen People' and their right to rule over us mere cattle.  This aside, the example of retraining their people to do all the jobs in the nation is laudable.  In the UK we have cuisine from every corner of the world, but surely it makes more sense to master the recipes and cooking techniques, than to allow colonies of immigrants to remain and to disrupt our lands.

Immigration is destructive.  It destroys the culture of the new country, and damages the nation of origin by taking its best people away.  Immigration creates a surplus population which damages the economic conditions of the host population.

Nobody asks why people feel they must leave their homes.  International finance requires war to expand its markets.  Impoverishing and destroying nations is big business.  The ability to then use those who flee the afflicted countries, to undermine the West, is an added bonus.

Next time you read a Zionist newspaper with its stories of immigrant crime, immigrants taking jobs etc, stop and ask why the immigrants are here in the first place.  Given the choice, they would have remained at home.  Certainly many would not bother coming to Europe if they had to adapt to our ways.  The solution to immigration is to stop destroying their countries, and to defend our own.  This means focusing on the real enemy; the Establishment.  It also means stopping playing their scapegoating games.

For the benefit of all, every nation should have its own secure homeland.  A world of strong and internally self-sufficient Nation-States, each free to celebrate its own culture, traditions and values, is the strongest defence against the internationalist menace.  It is not racist to love one's own and to respect other nations; it is racist to seek the destruction of individual nations and their submersion into a cosmopolitan world of rootless consumer-producers.  For freedom's sake, defend your nation; defend every nation.  All occupations and colonisations are an affront to freedom, and all must be opposed.