The UK is sick. A century ago, the human stock of the country was strong and vibrant. Now it is weak and decadent. The slaughter of the UK's finest in the Great War damaged the genepool in ways of which we are only now becoming aware. In the second half of that same conflict (following the pause from the end of 1918 to late 1939), the job of obliterating the best of humanity in Europe, was completed. The rise of the anti-humans such as Winston Churchill has continued apace until now we have in parliament the double act of the Jewish Capitalist Cameron and his sidekick Clegg, 'opposed' by the Jewish Communist Miliband. A healthy nation would not allow such people to take the helm of State.
Following the cessation of open anti-European warfare in 1945, the incoming Labour government put into practice the Fabian Socialist dream of the Welfare State. The Labour Party is a part of the Establishment, and so the creation of the Welfare State was not to benefit the people, but to increase the control the ruling powers have over us.
In response to the article about Newham, a reader, Cunctator, wrote the following:
In Merseyside and other conurbations we see the tragic consequences of welfarist policies in the literally scores of thousands of cases we are now seeing of the third successive generation of distinct and truly indigenous clans which have no experience, or even memory, of what it is to work for a living. All is paid for, and ad infinitum, by the welfare apparatus. Meanwhile Eastern Europeans and others are coming in and taking jobs which could easily be done by members of these local families but which they have become disincentivized to do by virtue of having become all too comfortable. And why not? After all, there seems to be no stigma attached to living on benefits.
This is sadly very true. The advent of Social Housing and Unemployment 'Benefits' has allowed for the wilfully idle to live without creating anything of use to the country. There is a section of the people who are welfare-dependent by choice, and have in many ways become judaised, insofar as they scorn the dignity of labour and they cannot appreciate the value of providing for one's kin by one's own work. The ideology that 'the State will Provide' has become endemic in much of the UK. I know families who will telephone the Council for the pettiest of reasons; for example, to replace a hinge on a gate. They will then moan that it can take the Council days to attend to them, not even considering that it would only take a few minutes to repair the gate themselves. Social Housing encourages laziness and a handout mentality. This of course is the whole idea. As Cuncator continues,
Welfarism was a snare, a trap from the very first. Far from helping the common people as a safety net, welfare was conceived by the usurers as a means of further enslaving the masses by giving their oppressors an ostensible justification for:
(1) the continued borrowing by governments of the debt money created out of thin air by private bank;
(2) the taxes, particularly graduated income taxes, land taxes and death duties that needed to be collected from the Goyim in order to ensure that our lords and masters got the counterfeit 'money' they had created out of thin air and lent to Gentile governments back. It is only once you understand that the far more of the money collected in taxes by governments goes towards paying the interest on fake national debts than is used to supply the more or less chimerical "public services", that you can begin to grasp the extent of the deception at the heart of the system.
"Oh, we only have a trillion pound debt because we have welfare commitments inherited from Labour", says Gideon Osborne on budget day. And the boobs fall for it. But the truth is that the UK has a trillion pound debt because it has repaid the Rothschilds ten times over (and counting) for the money that said family of usurers loaned to Pitt the Younger to fight the Napoleonic wars (1794-1815).
And Gideon the obsequious continues to pay the interest - never the principal! - on the original loan at five per cent like the good little Shabbat Goy he is. (You remember how giddy with exultation - "I've arrived!" - was Gideon when he was invited to Nat Rothschild's yacht to socialise with that usurer's creatures, such as, for instance, one of his main Russian-Jewish Mafia/Semya/Mishpucka underbosses Deripaska, and the disgusting Mandelson, who was and remains his main conduit to his minions in the labour 'leadership').
When you think of all the other pointless wars that have been fought since 1815 one can easily understand that the trillion sterling, obscene as it is, is almost certainly a serious underestimate which the usurers allow the UK elites to get away with as a special favour because "after all, they *have* been so accommodating over the centuries".
These points are very interesting. The Welfare State has not only created an underclass of 'scroungers' who are happy to be idle and have no interest in achieving any level of self-respect, but also it has justified the acceleration of taxation as an everyday reality. As everything is privatised, the rationale that the State is the guardian of the economy, has become an argument which no longer works. Thus the myth that the State is responsible for the well-being of the people, is used to justify taxation.
The whole ethos of the Welfare State is a corruption of the Christian (and Muslim) ethos of charity. In days gone by, people tithed a third of their income to assist the genuinely needy, and this was seen as a duty which was demanded by God. The Fabian Welfare State is essentially ætheistic, and so cannot appeal to a Higher Purpose for humanity. With the removal of a divine entity, the Welfare State exists to ensure that the highest power is not God, but is the State itself, and or course the powers behind the State, the Elders of Zion.
The Protocols of Zion state that the fabric of society must be destroyed, and that the focus of the individual must be on material matters. Karl Marx adapted the Talmudic faith to create the ideology which carries his name. Marx himself spoke of the lumpenproletariat who are worthless consumers who produce nothing. Their function is to undermine and weaken society and proletarianise the people as a whole, by sucking the real Workers dry of livable income through intolerable levels of taxation used to pay for them. The expansion of Welfare must be paid for, and it is upon those who do work that this burden is placed.
In the international paradise envisioned by Marx, the lumpenproletariat will be killed, and there will be no Welfare State. Welfare is a weapon to undermine society, but it will not be tolerated in the Workers' Republic, in which those who will not work, will die. Note that Marxist organisations such as the SWP campaign for Jobs. Those who believe that the 'left' support the workless, are mistaken.
Dignity is a fundamental aspect of humanity. The ability to feed one's family is a basic requirement of all humanity. The Welfare State steps in and takes away the right of the people to look after their own. The Welfare State gives the lumpenproletariat an excuse to be irresponsible.
In my previous work, I dealt with drug addicts and homeless people. People who become addicted to Heroin and Crack Cocaine are not stupid. They know that they stand a very serious chance of becoming addicts, but they choose to continue to take hard drugs because they know that the State will indulge their lifestyle choice, and the woolly-minded liberals will treat their self-inflicted woes as an illness. Hard drug addiction is pure selfish hedonism, and is a product of the liberal mindset.
I have worked with homeless people who are more than happy to live on the streets. It costs the taxpayer a fortune to house junkies, who typically destroy the accommodation given to them, and return to begging (and stealing) as a preferred option. On one occasion I saw a man begging for money who claimed to be hungry; I bought him a hot drink and some hot food, which he duly threw to the ground! Parasites such as that individual are very common, as I found in a professional capacity. Without the nanny state, junkies would have no access to free methadone, preferential housing, food parcels, monetary 'Benefits' etc, and would simply change their ways or die. The Welfare State creates drug addicts, and the law creates their criminal lifestyle. It would be better to legalise all drugs and sell them at such strength that the hedonistic extremists would soon kill themselves and thus make the world a better place by their departure.
The term 'Benefit' is taken literally by the contrived underclass. In a sane society, the genuinely vulnerable would be cared for, and the unscrupulous spongers would be forced to provide for themselves or to perish. We have a moral duty to look after the weaker members of society such as the infirm and disabled, but we have no duty to look after those who are irresponsible and think that they are somehow better than the rest of us and that we owe them a living. The lumpenproletariat are just as much parasites as the usurious bankers and the free-loading monarchy.
I shall leave the last word to Cunctator, who sums up the issue of the Welfare State and the fraudulent taxation system most admirably.
[People with an understanding of the depths of depravity of the lackeys of finance in the British Establishment should be] calling for the UK government to stop issuing IOUs (gilts/bonds) to private banks for money they have created out of thin air and loaned to the government. Once this parasitic encumbrance has been removed - the government can simply repay the 'national debt' in one go by issuing the banks with fake money to match the fake money that they loaned, and then announcing that the old pound sterling will be retired, and a new one based solely on the credit of the UK government will be issued in its place - the inflation, which is an intrinsic feature of this system, would instantly be completely eliminated; it would be possible to reduce taxes to virtually nothing; prosperity would return to the country; and the disgusting welfarism which has sapped the self-respect and work ethic of vast swathes of the working classes would be a thing of the past (forgiven and forgotten entirely but openly acknowledged for the shameful and self-destructive disaster it has been). If there are to be such things as versions of Housing Benefit, Income Support, Jobseekers' (sic!) Allowance and the other so-called benefits in the interregnum, they should each be strictly limited to six months or at the very most one calendar year for any given claimant. Any longer and people become accustomed to not working.
What these dubious 'benefits' should never be seen as ... entitlements. We are NOT entitled to any such support from the state. Such thinking only increases the parasites' power over us and leads to dependency such as we're seeing today, where entire generations of a single family think it is their God-given right to sit in their living rooms all day watching satellite television [on ridiculously large screens!] and gorging themselves on fizzy drinks, candy and processed foods, whilst expecting people who work to pick up the tab. What we need is for the government to stay out of our lives as far as possible. This will only be possible once it starts issuing its own credit, thereby automatically reducing the tax burden and ending inflation, deflation and the ensuing "business cycle" of banker-engineered booms and busts.
Once the evil alliance with the international usurers who have been seeking for centuries to enslave us all has been ended, there shall be no further demand for fake 'welfare'
3 comments:
you might find this interesting rufus,i wrote it for another blog.
BENEFITS
It amazes me that supposedly well-informed people can resent our benefits system.i think it is one of the few positive things that justify general taxation.
Money that gets paid to the poor and unable,passes from them to a variety of employers and producers,tradesmen and landlords,keeping the economy going.
This money paid out in benefits is borrowed by the government under the same agreement with the bank of england that they have always had,meaning that the principal is not expected to be paid back,only the interest.
This means that for every £100 spent into the economy through the benefit mechanism,only about £3 has to be paid back to the bank of england.that £3 is collected from the taxpayer,who in a roundabout way through the economy,is receiving £100 in return.
When the government bailed out the banks,they agreed to charge the taxpayer the full amount that was given to the banks,with none of that money going back into the economy and none of that money helping the poor and unable.
For every £100 given to the banks in the bail-outs,the taxpayer has to pay £100 back,and receives nothing in a roundabout way through the economy.
Taxpayers should be screaming for more money to be paid in benefits,so that people have more money to spend on the services taxpayers provide,thus providing more jobs and more general wealth for the country.
It is literally like giving the government £3 and receiving £100 back.
This is before you even start to look at the tragic reasons why some of us are unable to provide for ourselves and our families,or the increasingly likely prospect of tax-payers having to rely on benefits themselves.
Not being able to provide for one's self and not being able to physically contribute to your fellow countrymens well-being is soul destroying and not something anyone would wish for,unless they have been seriously misinformed about the route to happiness in this life.
Anyone that thinks they are better off not working when they are capable of it deserves pity not condemnation.they will never know the satisfaction of providing for themselves and others,or the spititual rewards of contributing to the wealth of their nation.
For most people,whether they are working or not,the difference in money received will not be much,but if you are working you have that satisfaction of doing a job well done,of being part of a like minded collective,all working to achieving the same goals.things like getting into a hot bath after a hard days work and feeling justified in your existence.there are so many other positive things that working provides,besides just wages.
People who have never worked,have never experienced that sense of worth,and the government by stirring up hatred against them just reinforce their belief that they must be better off not working.it is is a very small amount that dont want to work and the government just seem to be encouraging that attitude by using forced labour as a punishment for the long term unemployed.there is nothing that will put people off work more,than by forcing them to do it.
Another problem is this noble sounding ideal of 'no-one should be better off on benefits than working'.this statement is correct,but the way of implementing it is fundamentally wrong.benefits are carefully worked out to provide the absolute bare minimum needed to survive.in order to make sure that people are better off working it has to be the wages that are increased.if you decrease the amount of benefits then the poor and unable will have problems just existing,let alone living.this will lead to theft and fraud by necessity,harming the tax-payers businesses,where before they were making money from the benefit recievers.
If the money that the government are now spending in giving out private contracts to back to work schemes were to be given as a subsidy,to employers to pay more,people working would be better off than people on benefits and people on benefits would still be able to survive.
I cannot see any good at all in the governments plans,not for benefit recievers or tax-payers.it is a great shame that the majority of tax-payers dont seem to have thought much further than the benefit money reaching the benefit claimant,or worked out the real cost of providing it.
Any State sponsored 'welfare' is State dependency.
Since when did we nationalists recognise the magnanimity of the State/BoE?
Absolutely absurd.
The Welfare State is an excellent proposition but not when it is used to create State dependency and manipulation of the masses. Means benefit by the way is a polite way of saying SNOOPING.
Post a Comment