Water Water Everywhere - But not in the Taps!

The UK is collection of very wet countries.  Situated in the west of Europe, and stretching up into the northwest, the UK is famous for its dreary climate.  The country of Kernow may be relatively dry in comparison with the other countries in the UK, but it is still home to rain, rain and more rain.

It is absolutely ridiculous that the UK should experience hosepipe bans and drought conditions, but for many areas of England, this is the case.  2012 has so far been a year of snow and sleet, interspersed with a brief interlude of summery weather, then back to the usual wind, and yes, rain.  Yet, in the southeast of England, the water companies have imposed hosepipe bans and warnings that despite the continuing deluge, the water system is close to breaking point and there is a very real possibility that at some point it will not be possible to simply turn on a tap and get water.  This is an outrage.

Why is the water system failing?  Is it global warming drying up all the rain before it can be collected in the reservoirs? It is not!  The fake environmentalists would love to blame human greed for the failure of the water supply; for once they are correct.  No it is not the fabled man-made climate change which is to blame, but it is human greed which has caused the drought. 

The current situation in the southeast of England is very similar to the drought which hit Yorkshire in the 1990s.  The Pennine county of Yorkshire, along with its neighbour to the west, forms the wettest in all of England, yet in 1994, the county played host to convoys of water tankers topping up the reservoirs.  In the area close to the border with Lancashire, the water level in Scammonden Reservoir was so low that the old flooded village at the base of the valley was exposed.  1994 had a hot summer, but just like the new drought which has stretched from the southeast of England into the southern frontiers of Yorkshire, the weather had nothing to do with the water shortage.

Although Yorkshire is a land with many reservoirs of its own, it is serviced by the Kielder Reservoir in Northumbria.  In the 1990s , the company who own Kielder, sold the water to France, and exported so much water that the supply for Yorkshire was decimated.  Profiteering and greed were the sole cause of the 1994 drought in the wettest part of one of the wettest countries in western Europe.

So, could greed be a factor in the current drought in England?  With floods across the southwest, and the tragic death by drowning of a motorist due to the excessive rainfall, it would appear that the drought is not a natural event.  Just as with the 1994 episode, the current drought is due to reservoirs being emptied of water.  Unbelievably the international corporations responsible for the loss of water have gone further than their counterparts in the north of England, and have sold reservoirs which have then be filled in and built over with new housing developments.  Yes, in the fantasy world of the international capitalist, the water supply is doubly reduced by first selling off some of the already over-stretched reservoirs, and then building more housing on them to further increase demand for water!  This is so insane that it is hard to believe it is true - but true it is.  Not only have reservoirs been sold, but more are due to be sold.

In the 1980s the Thatcher regime sold the utilities and infrastructure of the UK.  Arguing that it was not the job of the government to run utility companies, and that they would be more efficient under private control, the bonanza of privatisation was carried out.  The constant rise in prices of the previously socialised utilities, have enriched the internationalist owners, but have not benefited the people one iota.  Not only has privatisation led to higher prices, but also to worse services.  This man-made drought is proof of the folly of selling the national infrastructure to rootless cosmopolitans who have no allegiance to people or country, and only see the financial profit to be made from raping the nation.

There is only one solution to the water problem.  That solution is to stop regarding the treatment and supply of water as something which can be left to the international market.  Water is an essential utility, and the fact that its control is a means to enrich multi-nationals is nothing less than scandalous.  People can do without electricity, but they cannot do without clean water.  More than any other utility, it is vital that the water industry is returned to ownership by indigenous Britons, and is provided at a cost which is self-sustaining, and does not result in profit.  Of course, any additional services beyond the supply of water and the maintenance of the system could reasonably be undertaken with an eye to making a reasonable profit, but the essentials must be regarded as life essentials, which is what they are.  What we need to save our water system is, in a word, nationalisation.

Nationalisation has become a dirty word due to its association with top-heavy bureaucracy and its inherent inefficiency through bad management and strike-happy workers.  This was certainly the case in the socialised control of the UK's infrastructure, but real nationalisation doesn't have to be that way.

Following the tragedy of the Second Great Intra-European War for Zion (WW2), the internationalist regime in London seized control of the economy by legally confiscating swathes of privately owned businesses, which were transferred into 'public ownership'.  What is considered in the UK as Nationalisation, is in reality the Socialisation of the means of production and transport infrastructure.

The Socialised companies in the UK were deliberately mismanaged to create the impression that only by putting them back into private control could they be efficient and provide a good and cost-effective service.  Those who live in the UK and experience the insane prices charged by the previously state owned industries can testify that privatisation in the UK is actually less efficient than State control, and a damned sight more expensive.  

Under the premiership of the hated Margaret Thatcher, (the shrew and war criminal who destroyed the Mining Industry and turned the UK from a nation of industry into one of service and servility), the previously socialised industries and infrastructure were 'privatised'.  This economic sleight of hand oversaw the transfer of indigenous-owned companies into State control, then into the hands of rootless speculators.  If the period of Socialisation could be labelled as Nationalisation, then its reversal was not so much Privatisation as Internationalisation.

In the UK, indigenous owned companies were stolen by the State, then given at ridiculously low costs to the international corporations who funded the government.  In the case of the Water Authorities, these became the Water Companies.  Before being internationalised, the Water Authorities employed men to keep the channels to the reservoirs free from blockages, thus allowing water from the hills to run into the collection centres.  After the Thatcher sell-off, the number of men employed was drastically cut, forcing unemployment levels up, and beginning the demise of our water system as the gulleys began to silt up.  We can thank Thatcher for the origins of the droughts of 1994 and 2012.

The terms used by economists are misleading.  State control is Socialisation, not Nationalisation; Stock Market corporate control is Internationalisation, not Privatisation.  The legal prohibition of foreign ownership, and the break up of larger corporations to ensure the maximum practicable level of private individual control, goes by the awkward label of Distributism - although Nationalisation would be more appropriate.  It is perhaps to distract the people from the real workable alternative to Internationalisation and Socialisation, that the economic labels are muddled.  By deception our enemies do war.

If we are ever to regain our lands, we need to stop playing the left-right game.  Yes, Nationalisation conjures up images of Communism, just as Nationalism is seen as somehow Capitalistic.  These labels have been used to divide us, but that is only because we allow ourselves to be divided.

The water industry must be Nationalised - that is, control must be taken from the international parasites who use our utilities for profit, and put into the hands of indigenous folk who are constrained by law to provide a constant clean water supply at a reasonable price, maybe even free.  Should they also provide services which are solely to generate income, then so be it - so long as the essential services are provided on a not-for-profit basis.

Those who oppose the international materialistic order and its destruction of culture and race, will be called 'Fascists'.  Does it matter?  Those who propose Nationalisation (but not in the Marxian form which is really Socialisation) will be attacked as enemies of free trade and capitalism, and possibly be called 'Reds'.  Again, does it matter? 

A country which relies on other countries for its basic resources, is doomed.  Multi-national corporations exist as countries in all but name.  The solution to the water shortages in the UK is to deal with the real causes - over-population and materialism.  The first problem can be solved by returning the surplus population to the countries from which they came (and encouraging all those who wish to live in a multi-culti country to depart our shores for a new life in any country which will tolerate their liberal insanity); the second problem can be solved by making the economy of the country serve the people, and not international criminals.

The solution to Internationalism is Nationalism.  Nationalism is not hatred of others but love of one's own.  The prerequisite of a national rebirth is full national economic control of everything produced in the country.  This does not mean State control, which is but a stepping stone to internationalisation, but absolute popular control, with private ownership of everything backed by a legal system which ensures that no trans-nationals can own (or profit by control of) anything in the country.  Holding on to ideological definitions created to divide us, is not an option.  We need to call for full Nationalisation (aka National Distributism) now - and understand what that term really means.