Sunday, 24 June 2012

UN demands Europe be mongrelised 'for the sake of the economy'

Peter Sutherland, the UN Special Representative on Migration, has declared that Europe must become multi-cultural, in order to achieve economic prosperity.  The Shabbat Goy, Peter Sutherland, is a former chairman of the criminal organisation BP, which wrecked the ecology of the Gulf of Mexico, and then went on to destroy Libya with its proxy army, NATO.  He is also currently non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs; the financial rapists who have destroyed the economies of the EU and USA.  This foul specimen has worked for organisations which have committed atrocities against humanity, thus his role as a UN representative, is entirely fitting.

In a sane world, Peter Sutherland, and his colleagues at the UN, BP and Goldman Sachs, would be hanging in the streets; but in this insane world, the lunatics are allowed to dictate policy to the rest of us.  Sutherland is also a Bilderberger

For decades, Europeans have been labelled as Nazis, Fascists, Far-Right Extremists, Conspiracy Nuts, and many other Culturally Marxist terms of abuse, for daring to suggest that we are being targeted for genocide.  Peter Sutherland has now shattered the illusion that it is only insane people who think that there is a plan to destroy Europe; he has publicly admitted as much, and gone on to argue that 'multi-culturalism' and an end to ethnic homogeneity, is vital if the capitalist economies of Europe are to survive.  Yes, that's right, the people must be sacrificed so that an economic system may live!

Religions, ideologies, and economic systems come and go, but when a people is gone, it is gone forever.  The economy must be made to serve the people.  If we are to serve the economy, then we are nothing but slaves.  It is time to say no to the materialism of capitalism, and of communism.  Our people must be protected from any expression of usury.  Yes, capitalism will fail if the current population is not manipulated; but it will fail at any rate, and the sooner the better.  If we allow the likes of Peter Sutherland to destroy our lands, we will have a future as nothing but producer-consumers, with no culture or identity.  What Sutherland proposes will lead directly to Europe becoming another slave economy, very similar to Communist China, only worse, insofar as the Chinese have an identity, and when the global state fails, they will re-emerge.  For us Europeans, if we are mongrelised, we will never re-emerge, and our existence will be over forever.

It is an outrage that Sutherland is able to advocate genocide from his UN platform, without fear of retribution.  It is time to make those who would advocate our demise fear the consequences of such words.  Violence is not the answer to our plight, however, Sutherland has declared war on us, and so he has made himself into a legitimate target or our ire.  Should someone take the opportunity to wipe the likes of Peter Sutherland, Goldman Sachs, the IMF etc from the globe, then that would be fully understandable.

We have watched and listened to the lies and the hatred of our enemies for too long.  If our enemies feel safe to order our annihilation, then we are in more trouble than any of us dared think.  Peter Sutherland must not be allowed to advocate our annihilation without any protestation.  At the very least, he must be removed from his positions of authority, and his words must be universally condemned. 

This is our world.  We must take it back.  If an open Declaration of War against the European people by the vested financial interests is not enough to awaken us from our trance-like walk into the footnotes of history, then what is?  The time for blindly accepting what our enemies throw at us is over.  It is time to shift the Resistance to a higher gear, and to deal with those who wish us and our children dead.


For more on this outrage , visit:
http://amren.com/news/2012/06/eu-should-undermine-national-homogeneity-says-un-migration-chief/
The comments section is especially interesting.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Peter Sutherland may be one thing, but what about Ross Sutherland?

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/2373818/Male-Barbie-Ross-Sutherland-to-appear-on-BBC3s-Snog-Marry-Avoid.html

What about him, eh, Rufus?

Anonymous said...

Also, Sutherland is an area which contains some of the most stunning scenery in the entire UK:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutherland

It is very empty and sparsely populated.

Rufus said...

I'm lost for words about the male Barbie! I see that he has become a media celebrity. That speaks volumes about what kind of social engineering is going on now. I thought that Scotland was the sane part of the United Kingdom!

Anonymous said...

Yes, he was on TV, along with a young male-to-female 'transgender' crossdresser. All of this on the BBC as well.

Every part of the UK (and every Western country) will have its deviant types, but on the whole things are less fucked up here compared to the large English cities. No rioting mobs of black 'youths' in Scotland yet - but if Scotland continues to import Africans, then maybe we will see some of these antics in the future... It is now impossible to go through the city centre of Aberdeen without seeing loads of them.

Rufus said...

Give me Rab C Nesbitt anyday. Although having said that, the returned version is so politically correct that it isn't funny. Barbie on the BBC? That is about the level of the creatures who control our media outlets.

With regards to the invasion of non-Europeans into Scotland, I would have expected that of Glasgow, or even Edinburgh, but Aberdeen? No doubt Alex Salmond will save Scotland from all this - afterall, he ia a Scottish Nationalist!! And David Cameron will conserve the institution of marriage, protecting it from homosexual corruption!

It is a sad day when the political class lie to us on such a scale that no one can fail to notice - yet people still vote.

Anonymous said...

There was a funny joke about Rab C Nesbitt and the Holocaust that I read on some forum... oh yeah, it was "the Holohoax has more holes in it than Rab C Nesbitt's vest"

Seriously though, I'm not even interested in questioning whether the Holocaust is true or not, or 'Jewish conspiracies'. Obviously you can read about these things on the internet if you want but I have researched some of this stuff myself and I just find it boring now. Supposedly some Jewish religious texts (the Talmud?) contain statements that call for the exploitation of non-Jews according to some websites that I've seen, but again it's difficult to know what to believe. What is interesting is the way that the Left has become anti-Israel and how the Right has become pro-Israel.

As for Scotland it's just taken longer for a significant immigrant population to build up, than it has in many parts of England. Aberdeen seeing immigration is to be expected because of the oil and gas industry and having two universities.

In contrast, many parts of northern England for example are ex-industrial wastelands that have large Pakistani populations many of whom were brought in decades ago.

Anonymous said...

One thing I am confident of, these days, is that there is nothing you can do to stop the decline of your people, your civilization, or whatever.

I read your most recent blog post, and saw that you noted that Europe/the West/white people as a racial group... is/are slowly but surely dying and being replaced. That is true enough. There is nothing you, or anyone else, can do about it. Anyone who thinks that they can be a hero or a saviour in order to reverse this process is in fucking la-la land. Completely out of touch with reality.

The biggest issue is that white women, across the world, simply aren't having enough (white) babies in order to reproduce the race. And as we all know, there's no fucking telling them what to do. Women have "the right to do everything and the obligation to do nothing".

So then are we white males forced into a kind of metaphorical 'eunuchdom' as a result of our predicament? Technology, economics and globalization are as much a factor in all of this as anything else.

Rufus, do you automatically reject the works of authors, writers, bloggers and so on who are either Jewish or pro-Israel? For me personally, I can't necessarily discount all of their ideas automatically like that just because of that connection. I'm not saying all of their ideas are going to be valid but I also can't rule out everything either.

For example, this blogger is at worst ambivalent towards Israel and says:

http://whiskeysplace.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/anders-breivik-beta-male-rampage/

"White guys are mostly, beta males, equal and therefore as sexually desirable as a bowl of cold oatmeal to women."

And while we're on that theme, a clearly anti-Jewish writer says:

http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/wfpim2.html

"The female transfixation associated with non-white males has been described more generally as being "like an animal caught in headlights.""

Anonymous said...

If it is a fact that whenever black people and white people inhabit the same territory, black male/white female relationships are a lot more common than white male/black female, then allowing immigration of black people is detrimental to the sexual-genetic-racial self-interest of white males, on average. That is completely logical.

And what is the point in having children, what is the point in having a girlfriend, what is the point in having family, friends, a job, a life, anything - in a declining civilization?

Anonymous said...

Why is the (far) Right hated?

Perhaps, naked (white male) sexual-genetic-racial self-interest is just too primitive and too embarassing to be out in the open sphere that is politics for the Left to handle. Too caveman-like.

Perhaps, the Left's victory stems from the fact that this is indeed the Age of Boredom. There is not enough work to do, so in a state of boredom, the Left creates change within society in order to make it interesting again.

During the early part of the last decade, prior to the global economic crisis, from an economic perspective, immigration was wanted due to there being many jobs available. This has now totally reversed, and mass immigration will have a negative impact on economies due to welfare states being made to hand out large amounts of money to a large economically inactive population.

But capitalism is not the sole cause of racism. (White male) genetic self-interest creates racism. The desire not to be cuckolded creates racism.

Having sex is racist.
Having children is racist.
Not killing yourself is racist.

This is because all of these activities are conducive to (white male) genetic self-interest.

What aspect of my thinking is flawed or illogical? None, unless someone can tell me otherwise, and I'd love to be proven wrong.