3 Million Afghans on their way to enrich our lands

Internationalism is a truly remarkable phenomenon.  In order to achieve a single global authority, with a single economy, all who stand in the way have to be neutralised.  Thus, we have the concept of Rogue States.  Does anyone actually bother to question what is meant by a Rogue State, or do most people just go along with what the media and 'their' politicians tell them, and accept that as the term is used derogatorily, then these States must be evil, and their demise must be to everyone's  benefit?  Sadly, all too many people who have been brought up by the one-eyed dæmon in the corner of the living room, do simply accept its wisdom, and do not consider that a Rogue State may just be one which hasn't fallen in step with the internationalist agenda.  Good or Evil do not necessarily enter into the equation; Rogue States are independent of the 'New World Order', and that is the only reason they are vilified.

Rogue States which have been bombed into submission include Russia in 1917, the defeated nations of Europe in 1945, South Africa in 1992, Serbia in 1999, amongst many others.  The economic and military conquest of 'Rogue States' (Free Nations not under the yoke of Internationalism), was gradual until the internationalists' internally manufactured atrocity of 11th September 2001 was used to ratchet the drive to a One World State to a faster pace.  Both World Wars were fought to push the agenda.  The barbarism of the present may seem to be more extreme than in times before, but that is only because we are living through it now.

Immediately after the '9/11' Massacre, the International menace, fronted by the USA, UK and Israel, attacked Afghanistan.  The War OF Terror has now been under way for a decade, with other countries being placed in the firing line by the three-headed beast.  In the first country to be brutalised, Afghanistan, the war still rages, and the death toll of both occupying forces and the Afghan Resistance continues to climb.  A land already impoverished by the previous Soviet occupation, and by the policies of its own government (during its brief phase of self-rule), Afghanistan has been devastated since the 2002 invasion; yet the people fight on with a determination that even their deadliest enemies cannot but admire.

As a result of the Soviet occupation, then the US-led one, many Afghans have fled their homeland.  Over 3 million Afghans are now residing in Pakistan; half of them as illegal immigrants, the other half as refugees.  With over 3 million people putting strains on resources, the Pakistani authorities have declared that at the end of the year they wish all Afghans to leave Pakistan.  The United Nations is pressing Pakistan to reverse its decision, and to allow all the Afghans who have crossed in to Pakistan, to remain there.

In an interview for the UK's Guardian newspaper, Habibullah Khan, secretary of the ministry of states and frontier regions, stated:

"The international community desires us to review this policy but we are clear on this point. The refugees have become a threat to law and order, security, demography, economy and local culture. Enough is enough...If the international community is so concerned, they should open the doors of their countries to these refugees. Afghans will be more than happy to be absorbed by the developed countries, like western Europe, USA, Canada, Australia."

The Guardian is a notorious liberal propaganda outlet; liberal bordering on Bolshevik.  No doubt the readers of the Guardian would regard an influx of 3 million more immigrants as a positive step to culturally enrich the UK.  As Minister Khan has plainly stated, the presence of so many people of a different origin is damaging the culture of Pakistan, and is the cause of economic and criminal problems.  Pakistan is an Islamic nation, thus it is far closer culturally to Afghanistan than any western nation, but it still is experiencing major problems as a result of the vast numbers of refugees, and illegal immigrants.  The problems for a nation further away from Afghanistan would be amplified.

It is absurd that the idea of relocating the Afghan refugees to lands far from their homeland is even being discussed.  Surely the only sensible solution to the Afghan crisis, is for the causes of the mass emigration to be dealt with, and for all the Afghans to be returned to Afghanistan?

Many of the Afghan migrants do not have the literacy skills required for work in the West; although this is probably preferable to having an influx of lawyers and social workers anyway!  But seriously, should the Afghan migrants find their way to the West, then they will inevitably become a drain on the social welfare system, and those who are able to work will (thanks to the ludicrous system of Positive Discrimination) take jobs from those already resident in our lands.  The socio-economic cost of allowing vast numbers of migrants into our lands is staggering.  The cost of providing unemployment benefits, housing, education and access to free healthcare provision should immediately halt any possibility of any immigrants being allowed across our borders - especially in these dark days of austerity when services are being cut to bail out the speculative gambling debts of the International Bankers.  In terms of economics alone, it is insane to even consider allowing as many as one more immigrant to enter our homelands.

Another factor involving immigrants from war-ravaged Afghanistan, has to be the fact that it is the countries of the West which have reduced the country to its tragic plight.  It makes absolutely no sense to allow millions of people who belong to a country we are at war with, to enter our countries.  When one considers that the Afghan people have a culture which does not shirk at suicide bombing as a tactic of war, then the risk posed of allowing people so enraged at the destruction of their land by regimes which hide behind us, to slip in amongst the vast numbers of common people who may despise us, but wouldn't necessarily wish to kill us, is too high to contemplate.

There is a very simple solution to the Afghan problem.  That solution is to stop the wars for corporate gain, and to return the Afghans to Afghanistan.  The cost of the ongoing wars is such that it would be acceptable to divert the funding for war into funding for the physical reconstruction of homes and places of work, thus allowing Afghanistan to become self-sufficient.  The cost in Welfare Benefits after allowing immigrants to enter the West would be far higher than paying for the redevelopment of the countries we are at war with.  Welfare expenditure would necessarily be ongoing, and increase as the immigrants multiplied; reconstruction costs would be short term, and the bill could be footed largely by the multi-national corporations for whom the wars have been fought.  A sane and humane policy towards Afghanistan could be applied equally to Iraq, Libya, Somalia, and every other country from which people have migrated into the West.  Just as Pakistan has admitted that mass immigration doesn't work, so should every country take the brave and necessary step of closing its borders to all migrants other than indigenous expatriates who should return as a part of a global return and re-homogenisation of every sovereign land.

Of course, we can expect the mass influx of Afghans to take place, and the resultant demise of our cultures, our economies, our Welfare States, and what remains of our sense of security from crime and terror.  The whole Internationalist agenda thrives on human misery, and the ability to advance as we fight one another.  It is ironic that those who argue for a sensible approach to migration, are labelled as 'haters', whereas those who believe in open borders are seen as kind and moral.  Neither the Afghan people nor those of the countries they are relocated to, will benefit from the 'kindness' of the liberal lunatics who would love to see them here (although not in their neighbourhoods!)  The social cost will be immense and the misery unfathomable.  It is much better to abandon the International Project altogether and build a world of socially-just free nations, in which the people are served by the economy, and not sacrificed to make the super-rich even richer.  But then, the objective of Internationalism IS the obliteration of free humanity, whether Afghan, English, of whomever.  

The Afghans are coming.  It is not their fault that their lands have been destroyed.  It is not their fault that they have to flee from war and deprivation.  The blame lies squarely with International Stock Market Corporations, and the toadying corrupt governments they use to wage their wars of financial and physical conquest.  To solve the Afghan problem requires dealing with its root cause; and that lies not in Islamabad or Kabul; but in Washington DC, the City of London, and Tel Aviv.