The UK's Chief Rabbi, and BBC religious programming supremo, 'Lord' Sacks, has written to the German Ambassador to the UK to condemn the ruling by a court in Cologne outlawing the bizarre pædophilic practice of circumcision.
Circumcision has no medical benefits, leaves the infant traumatised, and lowers the ability of an adult male to experience sexual pleasure as normal men do. Most of the sensitive pleasure-responsive nerves are in the foreskin, and it is that part of the penis which acts as the lubricating mechanism during sex. According to the færy stories of the Old Testament and Talmud, the big scary God of the Jews, having created humanity in his image, suddenly took a disliking to foreskins and ordered his devotees to have their male children maimed in perpetuity. For a reason which beggars belief, the Jewish leaders took incorporated this proscription against foreskins into a ritual which involves a Rabbi masturbating an infant's penis so that it rises, then slicing off the foreskin with his nail, and putting it in his mouth to give it a good suck! All this is performed before a watchful congregation, and must be done before the child is eight days old. No wonder Jews suffer more neuroses than Gentiles, with this start in life!
Rabbi Sacks has reacted to the news that the Germans have chosen to protect children from the barbaric and pointless practice of Circumcision, by screaming abuse against the Germans, and - of course - bringing the spectre of the Holyhoax into the issue. Obviously, the mention of the fabled Shoah is to conjure the idea that should the Germans dare to oppose any aspect of Jewish power, then the next step will be the Gas Chambers! The outburst of the Rabbi is offensive to all Gentiles, and is completely absurd. One would hope that the UK government demand Rabbi Sacks apologise to the German people for his outrageous comments, and perhaps that the Berlin government should consider diplomatic actions against London if the UK government collaborates with the defamation of Germany, by a Rabbi living on English soil. Somehow, methinks the chances of the Rabbi even acknowledging the offence he has caused, or for any politicians on either side of the North Sea taking a stand against his vile comments, is slight to say the least.
Lest anyone think that I have exaggerated any of this, the following is an article from the London Jewish Chronicle, confessing the lunacy and paranoia of the elders of Jewry...
Chief Rabbi protests to Germany over circumcision ruling
by Simon Rocker, Jewish Chronicle, 5th July, 2012
The Chief Rabbi has protested to the German Ambassador in London over the Cologne court ruling on circumcision.
In a letter to Georg Boomgaarden, Lord Sacks wrote of his “shock and dismay” at the decision, which would “render the Jewish practice of circumcision illegal and those who perform it liable to imprisonment.
“That a German court, within living memory of the Holocaust, can ban a central practice of Judaism defies belief.”
He warned that if the ruling stood, the damage to Germany’s reputation would be “irreparable”.
The Cologne court acquitted a doctor who had carried out a circumcision on a four-year-old Muslim boy only because he had been unaware that it was a potentially criminal action. It stressed that the interests of children took precedent over religious freedom.
On Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour last week, a longstanding Jewish opponent of circumcision, Dr Jenny Goodman, claimed that it caused pain and damage to babies. She alleged that most UK Jews circumcised their children for reasons of cultural identity rather than in obedience to divine command.
The case for circumcision was put by the Muslim Council of Britain’s Shaykh Ibraham Mogra.
UPDATE:
Angela Merkel has caved in to Jewish pressure, stating that Germany needs Jews and Muslims, and that there must be no obstacles preventing them practising their barbaric rituals. What a surprise. Merkel is an embarrassment to all of Europe.
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/70235/chancellor-merkel-furious-over-german-circumcision-row
UPDATE:
Angela Merkel has caved in to Jewish pressure, stating that Germany needs Jews and Muslims, and that there must be no obstacles preventing them practising their barbaric rituals. What a surprise. Merkel is an embarrassment to all of Europe.
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/70235/chancellor-merkel-furious-over-german-circumcision-row


5 comments:
To a Cultural Marxist (people who read Socialist Worker and similar types), a heterosexual adult white male experiencing sexual pleasure would probably constitute fascist, racist, sexist, misogynistic objectification of women.
I will go through all these points...
1. Why fascist? Sex is inherently about competition, 'the struggle for existence', think ideas about social Darwinism and links to fascism. There are also parallels with the wrongs of capitalism in that genes, as with businesses, compete for survival. A truly egalitarian world would see men (well, white heterosexual men at the very least) stop having sex.
2. Why racist? Well if a white male is aroused by a white female, he is excluding non-white females on the basis of looks, which is racist. If a white male is aroused by a non-white female, he is 'othering' her as an 'exotic' sex object (a kind of commodity fetishism) and not really seeing her humanity. Racism is about denying the humanity of the 'other'.
3. Why sexist? "All sex is rape" - Andrea Dworkin. Enough said.
4. Why misogynistic objectification? Men see women's bodies as being like pieces of meat when they have sex. Bloated images of buttocks, breasts, vaginas and anuses proliferate in pornography - images which would not be out of place in a slaughterhouse. As already stated, revolutionary egalitarianism demands that the fascist male sex drive be consigned to history. It also has no biological basis because there are no physical, mental or other differences between races, sexes etc. Distinctions between races and sexes are only a byproduct of class oppression that exists so that the dominant hegemony can subjugate social groups, for example when the USA had laws against miscegenation.
...
That was my attempt at being a Marxist for a little while.
In reality, I think Marxists are scum who are responsible for the ethnic cleansing of white populations around the globe.
The (white heterosexual) male sex drive *is* fascist, racist and misogynistic by its very own Darwinian nature.
Is castration the ultimate answer to 'the struggle for existence'?
Should white men be castrated so that Nigerians and other Africans can roam around in nightclubs looking for white women to take into bed with them?
Wouldn't that be the most anti-fascist thing to do?
Wouldn't that be 'social justice'?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice
Is a defence of capitalism a bit like a battered wife defending her husband in a state of Stockholm syndrome?
Marxism reduces everything social to the economic.
Is a leftist calling for more and more immigration, political correctness and multiculturalism a bit like a white slut in an interracial porn film saying 'fuck me, fuck me, FUCK ME HARDER WITH YOUR BIG BLACK COCK, I WANT TO HAVE A BLACK BABY?'
Post a Comment