When I worked in the public service, I had a colleague who absolutely loathed Pakistanis (or Asians as the pc crowd insist on calling them). To hide her hatred of all Pakistanis she did voluntary work with a Pakistani charity in the town where she lives. To boast to her colleagues of just how politically correct she was (and presumably still is), she brought her paperwork in to work so that everyone could see how much she did for Pakistanis. As is the way with the illiberal acolytes of the new religion of Political Correctness / Cultural Marxism, she could not heap enough praise on every culture she encountered; other than her own. As a good 'liberal' she was the epitome of a self-hating gentile. The poor self-deluded creature even took to wearing a sari to work.
For all her self-debasement, and toadying to a culture not her own, on social occasions all it took was half a shandy and she would be more than eager to launch into tirades about how much she hated the people who had broken into her house, stalked her, threatened her children, and subjected her to all manner of suffering in order to 'encourage' her to sell her house to one of their kin. Even whilst in full drunken flow, she could not see that it was people such as herself who created the multi-culti nightmare she herself was suffering from. She would not admit that what she was experiencing was ethnic cleansing, and would rail against anyone who dared suggest such a thing. When I last saw her, she was still bending over backwards to appease those who wish her ill. Remarkably, she is still in the same house and will not budge. That in itself is laudable, but why oh why, embrace the very multiculturalism responsible for her plight? My former colleague was a perfect example of the cognitive dissonance experienced by the minority of those who embrace multiculturalism, yet still live in areas where they are a minority. Perhaps suffering from Stockholm Syndrome may be a more apt description for such people.
A more common manifestation of the sickness of liberalism tends to be found amongst the hypocrites who live in areas almost entirely unspoilt by the culture destroyers of the anti-indigenous Establishment. One only has to think of the small Yorkshire town of Hebden Bridge, nestling in the Pennines. Although flanked to the west by the economically-devastated Lancashire town of Rochdale, and to the east by the heroin-ridden hell hole known to the locals as Halalifax(!), Hebden Bridge is almost entirely populated by indigenous English folk. The town is home to a considerable number of white-flight Londoners, who fled the capital as soon as their neighbourhoods started to become over-run with newcomers. One would imagine that having effectively been ethnically cleansed themselves, they would form a strong line of defence for the indigenous people and our culture. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The liberal rats who pollute the Yorkshire air, are vehement campaigners against 'racism', and will not tolerate anyone who dares to question the wisdom of mass migration. Unlike those who they deem to admonish for politically incorrect thoughts, these people have the luxury of being able to afford to move to another indigenous area from which to pontificate about the wonders of multiculturalism. The liberal hypocrites who praise multiculturalism from a distance, are far worse than those who choose not to see the reasons why they struggle to cope with life inside areas impacted by the international disease.
It is a mistake to blame the deliberate destruction of our culture on the new arrivals to our lands. A feature of the capitalist system is mass unemployment. In a healthy and sane economy based upon Social Justice, employment and production are tailored to maximise the living standards of the people; the economy of the UK is clearly based upon Social Injustice. The international order which exists in microcosm within the UK, is structured around the ethos of transferring wealth from the majority of the people to the ruling minority. In order to keep profits at a maximum, wages must be held down to the minimum practicable level. It is for this reason that mass unemployment is necessary; afterall, the last thing that the rulers wish to have is a population which is able to demand wages sufficient to live at a level other than borderline poverty.
The UK system of exploitation by unscrupulous and faceless bureaucratic directors of commerce, needs a scapegoat for the economic hardship it causes; a highly visible, culturally distinct, non-indigenous population provides such a scapegoat; especially when legislation is enacted to give such people priority in work, and freedom from criticism of any aspect of their lifestyles. In order to encourage people from other lands to migrate to ours in search of work and a better standard of living, 'our' Establishment has waged economic and military wars across the globe to destabilise entire countries. Having had their homelands destroyed, the people are then invited to take refuge in the UK by the very regimes which made life in their own lands intollerable. War is very profitable, and it is also a good way to transfer people across the globe in order to destroy cultural and ethnic homogeneity. The people who move around the world are a symptom of the international financiers' criminal network; they are victims of the same culture destroyers who have ruined our lands.
The liberals who fight against what they call racism, are unwittingly a part of the reason for racial conflict. I wholeheartedly agree that it is wrong to see people only in terms of their skin colour, or faith. However, it is equally wrong to deny that there is a beauty which exists within the distinct ethnic groups. Those who like to shout racial epithets, but do not care to consider why vast numbers of people from other lands have come to our shores, only serve to keep the current system in place. It is absolutely vital that we see beyond the cultural conflicts within our borders, and appreciate that every culture is sacred, and that every people is worthy of life. In order to protect the sanctity of culture, faith and ethnic origins, it is of paramount importance that all nations be allowed to live in their own way, free from outside interference.
Liberals and other multi-cultists are obsessed with 'racism', but what is it that so preoccupies them? If, as liberals claim, 'racism' is the judging of people according to their race, then the liberals themselves are the most racist people on the planet. Not only do they hate their own people, solely because they have White skin and European ancestry, but they ardently support the idea of multiculturalism, which in its essence requires the mixing of the races, until there is but one uniform race of indistinguishable people. This would mean that there would be no Whites, no Blacks, no Arabs, no Turks, no Chinese etc etc; only a mass of people who could not claim any link to any heritage. There is another word for this; it is genocide.
Liberalism is racism. It is a belief that no distinct races should exist; it is a hatred of all which anchors the people spiritually and culturally; it is a failure to identify with nation and with pride in the ancestors. Liberalism is vital for the globalist agenda of reducing humanity to rootless, spiritually dead, materialistic producer-consumers; it is the driving force for global slavery. Liberalism is the communitarian basis of both the despotism of Finance Capitalism and the servitude of Communism.
In the UK and many land wracked by multiculturalism, those who believe in a free world of independent nations, are labelled as haters. In truth we love our own people, to the point where we are able to see patterns emerging globally which are damaging to every people. Unlike the multi-cultists who fear a world of divergent ideas, differing economic models, competing faiths etc, those who are slandered as haters, really are at the forefront of a defence of the diversity of humanity. We are not scared of that which we do not understand; we are not threatened by that which we cannot control - these are the characteristics of the liberal mindset, which seeks to hide behind the buzzwords of tolerance and equality, whilst actively fighting to destroy everything which makes life worth living.
A free world, in which the people can come and go as visitors to far off lands, to enjoy the rich cultures and traditions which the world has to offer, can only exist if those lands exist; and the lands are nothing unless they belong solely to their own people, and vice versa. If the multi-culti sickness is not rooted out and destroyed, the world will be one bland labour camp; a sweatshop modelled on the slavery of Communitarian China. When that point is reached, there will be no wage bargaining, and unemployment will be dealt with in the manner of a capital offence.
Next time a liberal has the audacity to call you a bigot, remember that the liberal ideology is a cover for a depth of self-hatred which will not be satisfied until ethnic genocide has been achieved worldwide, and those who shuffle to the sweat shops are human in name only. It is time to let the bigots know that we can see through their delusions, and that we are not going to indulge their madness anymore.
6 comments:
It's interesting you mention the different places in Yorkshire, and discuss their character.
Here in north-east Scotland, the countryside, small villages, small towns and suburbs are about 97-99% white. The city of Aberdeen is a different matter altogether and I estimate that at least 10% of the city's population is non-white, although it may be even higher than that. This is particularly pronounced in the city centre, and areas surrounding it.
Earlier today I was standing on a street in Aberdeen, and there were about 8 people visible in the street, including Chinese, Indian and African people, but I was the only white person there. No white (Scottish, British, European or extra-European) people there at all other than myself.
You can go into some shops in the city centre (such as some of the new mini Sainsbury's outlets that have recently opened) and it is not uncommon for the majority of the people in the shop to be non-white.
Aberdeen though is not particularly a strong hotbed of political leftism. Within Scotland, Glasgow surely has the strongest left-wing scene.
The term 'liberal' is problematic: in one sense it refers to classical liberalism (free market laissez-faire capitalism, with minimal government intervention, low taxes and a small public sector), which is often the party ideology of centre-right parties in Western countries.
On the other hand, in popular discourse 'liberal' can refer to left liberalism (social democracy, favouring a mixed economy with a large public sector which is given the means to exist as a result of private sector workers paying tax, which is then spent on politically correct socialist trash organizations that print horrible leaflets and employ workers who sit around in offices doing very little all day), which is often the party ideology of centre-left parties in Western countries. The term 'liberal' is also used to refer to those who advocate ideologies further to the left of this. Left-wing political parasites suck up the wealth created by private sector organizations in the form of taxation, and use it to accumulate more and more power.
I was reading some Foucault the other day. A notable concept he came up with was that of 'biopolitics'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopower
Foucault was a contemporary of Jacques Derrida, who came up with the idea of 'deconstruction'.
To quote yourself, Rufus:
"Liberalism is racism. It is a belief that no distinct races should exist; it is a hatred of all which anchors the people spiritually and culturally; it is a failure to identify with nation and with pride in the ancestors. Liberalism is vital for the globalist agenda of reducing humanity to rootless, spiritually dead, materialistic producer-consumers; it is the driving force for global slavery. Liberalism is the communitarian basis of both the despotism of Finance Capitalism and the servitude of Communism."
That's all very well, but there are some people out there who will laugh in your face for saying things like that, and intellectually crush you as well. Try this on for size:
http://itself.wordpress.com/author/akotsko/
Have a read of some of the work by this Adam Kotsko, who claims to be a "long-time opponent of nationalism and family values".
If you find yourself wanting to read more authors like this, try looking up Jane Clare Jones, or Robert Jensen.
Do it, Rufus. Read some of the work of these authors, who are extremely hostile to anything "right-wing", but nonetheless there are moments that they can be thought-provoking.
My thoughts entirely, though expressed rather better.
From a brief scan, Kotsko seems to be a perfect example of a typical 'self-hating lefty'. I read the two of his articles tagged 'nationalism' but I couldn't work out what his alternative to either that or 'family values' might be.
Tragically I doubt very much whether Kotsko or others of his ilk have an appreciation to what I consider to be the conspiratorial view of history. He's still fighting the old left/right battle oblivious to the fact that it's the same ruling elite puppet masters pulling the strings of both.
If we are to effectively resist and defeat the globalist agenda then I think it's essential to try and move the discourse beyond the old left/right paradigms. The alternative is to only further entrench the 'deluded liberal'. The truth is, aspects of the agenda are pursued through both left and right to some degree, although I'll agree that a significant amount is of the 'left' persuasion.
Harry, I notice you're from Wolverhampton.
There is a significant difference between Wolverhampton and Aberdeen in quite a lot of ways.
For example, the north of Scotland is a lot less densely populated than almost all parts of England, and it also has a lower % of non-whites in the population.
Do you feel Harry that you live in an area which is too densely populated and does not have enough going for it these days? Too many immigrants (and their descendents), who should never have left their homelands?
Where I live, apart from the city of Aberdeen itself, I would say that the surrounding area is mostly relatively sparsely populated.
Anon, the transformation of Wolverhampton in my lifetime has been staggering. I have to confess to having been a typical lefty for many years. Even when I worked out something wasn't quite right the brainwashing was so strong the thought of becoming 'right wing' filled me with a sense of dread. Of course I've managed to work through all that and pretty much shrugged off both left wing and right wing tags. There is a way of thinking that moves beyond those false labels.
As for being too densely populated I can only say yes. By a long way. More and more flats are being built and even when houses are developed I've noticed they have ridiculously small gardens. This isn't healthy at all. Immigration should be stopped and reversed for this reason alone.
Helmsdale - thank you for the Adam Kotsko link. According to the liberal extremist, it is an abuse of a woman's human rights to even consider her unborn baby as a distinct entity (http://itself.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/the-fantasy-of-fetal-personhood/#more-8391). It is worth reading such material as this, if only to visit the Alice In Wonderland world of the Establishment. What a bizarre place it is! You are correct when you state that the term Liberal is problematic, embracing as it does, the mixed economy (a good thing), and also unbridled greed and exploitation (an excuse for unspeakable evil). Labels exist to divide us, insofar as we either cling to them defiantly, or use them as points of reference for attack. Sadly, such is the nature of language, and so immersed are we in the system itself, that it is difficult not to rely on terms. This of course is the heart of the issue - we have to free ourselves from the system entirely, which is easier said than done.
Revolution Harry: I live in the metropolitan part of Yorkshire. here, if you stand still for long enough, you will have a house built on you! In my area, more and more houses are being built, yet more and more existing properties are becoming empty - repossessed homes, pubs, shops etc. This is madness. And as you say, much of the new housing is to accommodate free-loading spongers who have been enticed to our shores by the chance of an easy life paid for by us. Then, there is the deliberately socially engineered breakdown of families which sees more and more people living alone, and of course the explosion of lone-parent homes. None of this is good.
An interesting point regarding the Construction of the Welfare State or Social Security
These were initiated because the State was scared of the Populace
Also the Rich felt a little uneasy with those returning from War who had lost everything
Now they are not scared and the the system is being dismantled with austerity measures
Post a Comment