The international global plantation grows stronger by the day. There are many voices shouting in warning about what is happening around the world, and about what is yet to come. We are not short of questions regarding what is to be done to avert the coming tragedy. Sadly, we are short of answers.
An interesting site which has only recently sprung forth onto the internet is Bill Baillies' Nation Revisited. A harsh critic of 'conspiracy theorists', Bill Baillie has a view of our plight which does not see Jews responsible for our every woe. Indeed, he points to the fact that of the ten richest people in the world, as listed by Forbes, nine are Gentiles.
Nation Revisited is unapologetically written from a pan-Europeanist perspective. Ideologically, NR makes no bones of following in the footsteps of Oswald Mosley's Union Movement. The ideology of Oswald Mosley is not without problems; for example, Mosley infamously ordered his supporters to fight in the European war of suicide (1939-45). However, that does not mean that everything from the Mosley era should be written off.
History is always presented in the light of the dogma of the ruling Establishment. The plays of Shakespeare were in many ways so ridden with Tudor propaganda, that they hid the truth as well as the modern BBC. It is with this in mind that sites such as Nation Revisited are worth viewing. Our perception of the political movements of the twentieth century cannot but be coloured by the impact of sustained anti-European slander. Where the NR site shines through is that it does not merely deal with historical phenomena, but addresses the issues of today.
Our problems are so severe, that we do ourselves no favours by restricting the information we allow ourselves to read. Anyone who can contribute with proposals to help us in our struggle, is worthy of our attention.
To visit Nation Revisited, go to http://nationrevisited.blogspot.com
11 comments:
I had a look but I've got to be honest NFA, I wasn't too impressed.
"According to the conspiracy theorists the Jews are responsible for most of the great crimes of history.'
Some of them might but not all and not by a long way.
"But the world is not run by conspirators meeting behind closed doors. It is governed by elected politicians meeting in democratic assemblies and influenced by media moguls openly promoting global capitalism..."
I had to stop right there.
Right let's get this straight, Mosley was a KOSHER fascist.
Those who have even the most basic understanding of Mosley would know that he latched on to fascism as a vehicle to further his own career and he used this vibrant young European movement to his own ends.
AH if he had been successful in establishing a British prescence in a National Socialist Europe would in all probability have asked David Lloyd George to take charge and D. Ll. George in turn would no doubt have accepted as it is no secret that he had great admiration for all that NS Germany/AH had achieved.
As regards there being no 'jewish conspiracy' justified by what? The fact that 9 Gentiles are in the 'top ten' richest people in the world, what does this prove exactly? Why not draw attention to the COMBINED riches of the many more rich elite?
Also, we are talking a clique of approx. 200 Elders and NOT the entire jew people, jews who probably suffer equally if not more because they are seen as expendable by 'their own'.
Also, when one refers to the nefarious jew, it is the Ashkenazim/Khazar and not so much the Sephardim that one needs to concentrate their venom towards, although ALL who follow the Talmud ought to be exterminated!
A further point for Bill Baillie to consider is that Europe is controlled at the head by one family the Rothschilds and U.S. is Rockefellers domain. Now if he would care to devote more than 5 minutes on these creatures then he will be able to see the web that these spiders have (and still) spin.
To Billie he is exposing himself to the contradiction and hypocrasy that embodied the Kosher fascism of Mosley.
Charles Martel
Right, had a look at Billie's site and to be honest 'Old Holborn' is far more interesting and understanding of politics than this clown.
Also, it is a constant wonder how Mosley/BUF are still given publicity even though they achieved nothing in propotion to the Greenshirts of the Social Creditors who have been wiped from history and in no small part Arnold Leese is also never made mention of.
Mosley was an unprincipled, disloyal/dishonest, backsliding, 'kept man' and charlatan of the highest order.
PJ!
Thanks for the comments. I obviously do not share the 'coincidence' worldview, or that all our ills are the product of greed - and nothing else. There is more behind events than meets the eye, and this is obvious when one considers that 'money' is created out of thin air by the usurious bankers and that it is but a means to the real goal - power.
Regarding Mosley, for me, the fact that he ordered the BUF to fight against our European kin, is enough to condemn him. He jumped from party to party and in the end, retired from politics a wealthy man. He was certainly not a threat to the Establishment, as can be seen by the fact that the ultimate traitor, Churchill, campaigned for his freedom when was briefly detained.
The economic solution of Social Credit, alongside Distributism, has been deliberately kept down, due to the fact that it WORKS! The Guernsey Experiment (available in full at: http://www.aberhartfoundation.ca/PDF%20Documents/Social%20Credit%20Pamplets/How%20Guernsey%20Beat%20the%20Banks.pdf) proves that the capitalist/communist/communitarian system can be beaten.
Arnold Leese is an interesting figure, when understood in the context of the days of Empire. If you have any information on him, please send it in. Also, if you have a link for OH, I would like to have a look at his site.
http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.co.uk/
Old Holborn. Check out the links to his co-bloggers.
With regards Mosley he can be placed firmly with Enoch in the 'safety-valve' clique.
It never ceases to amaze me how some 'of our own side' refer to these charlatans as if they were the saviours of our race & nation.
There are plenty of Labourites and the odd Liberal/SDP'er who have over the years muttered some laudible comments with regards race but there is more to a viable ideology which will draw us back from the abyss than some 'safety-valve' utterings.
Enoch used the concerns of one of his constituents as a means to embarass Heath in his own battle of self interest, evidence in his behind the scenes influence on Thatcher (who was also no friend of Heath).
It's all part of the Establishment political game and we are not going to be allowed to play AND NEITHER DO WE WANT TO!
Thanks for the link. Have you visited http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/ (listed in his section 'cockwaffle!)? I will have to have a good look at Old Holborn, and his linked sites. Very interesting.
There are too many safety-valves, who talk well, but inevitably remain within the Establishment fold. Thatcher won the 1979 General Election by promising to deal with immigration - then promptly 'dealt' with the issue by allowing millions more people into the country! One could also say that Nick Gri££in has become one of that sort - happy to take his EU salary, and to go soft on multi-culturalism and Israel.
Old Holborn's no friend of the British. He's an ardent 'open borders', pro-immigration libertarian.
http://bastardoldholborn.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/what-elephant.html
Many are not 'the friend of Britain' but just as we are intelligent enough to not have to be spoonfed 'agreeable' ideas/news items we can take on board and expand our viewpoint, also it serves to help some 'of our own side' to realise how the general public feel towards how we portray our own message.
Many of our own side are quite happy to preach to the converted (and a lot of cases perverted) and conentrate on building their own cliques.
Much as it may come as a shock to some, the vast majority think such people are bores and ocd-bait!
I understand what you're saying but from my experience Old Holborn is beyond reaching. Many have tried and failed however reasonable the points raised.
You make some very good points which I will endeavour to answer in a post. It is a shame that OH has chosen to limit his outlook. To use an old adage, it is good to travel alongside those who are seeking the truth, but one must never trust those who believe they have found it!
Truth will always win in the end.
The masses will always opt for the easy option and there will always be those who carry this palatable message.
We may be few but we are many!
Post a Comment