There are many self-appointed leaders who have gathered a cult-like following, who they lead in a direction which suits their own agenda. Alex Jones is perhaps the highest profile leader. Jones consistently distracts attention from the Zionist and (Vatican II) fake Catholic elements of the international order by constantly speaking about 'Nazis' and Germanic Death Cults; his entire modus operandi is fear-mongering and diversion. Those who follow Jones, are deftly steered away from real information regarding the nature of the international enemy, and are left with a feeling of hopelessness. Even if Jones is not working directly for the enemy, his negativity has the effect of creating an idea in his followers that the victory of the enemy is inevitable.
Another leader in what has become known as the Conspiracy movement is David Icke. Icke is problematic insofar as he mixes his well-researched exposé of the Zionist mafia with New Agey rhetoric about Infinite Conciousness and Inter-dimensional Shape-Shifting Reptilians; by so doing, he gives the impression that the battle in the physical world is really pointless, and is comparable to 'combing the mirror'. Now, whilst Icke is certainly right that there is more than just the physical realm, unless he is able to give advice on how to take the battle to a realm where it will be effective, then his contribution to the cause will be to awaken people to their peril, then lull them into a false sense of security, being as everything will be alright when we are dead. Ironically, Icke condemns Christianity whilst speaking of forgiveness, love, unity and the need to escape the five sense reality; which, if I am not mistaken, is the ethos of Christianity!
The only way for Icke's strategy to work would be if the international enemy were to abandon their diabolical schemes, give up their wealth and power and become agents of love and light! Presumably, the inter-dimensional shape-shifters would have to do likewise. As a solution to our ills, this one is less than encouraging.
Away from the key figures there are many activists who are contributing in their own way, to getting the truth about our predicament out to as many people as possible. An interesting character is an Englishman who goes by the name Muad'Dib. This man was incarcerated for sending jurors involved in a related trial, copies of his documentary, '7/7: Ripple Effect', which highlighted the involvement of the State in the 2005 London Transport murders. In a recent interview with Critical Mass Radio, MD discussed the problems facing our people, and ways in which we can achieve change. All workable strategies are worthy of our attention. One of his most interesting ideas is the fulfilment of a real Jubilee, which would forgive debt, and alleviate our financial hardships. As a first step towards a post-materialistic society, this an intriguing idea. The full radio interview (edited to remove breaks and music) can be found at the following video.
Direct Link to Video: http://youtu.be/5CPJKjZzTqs
It is all well and good to expose our enemies, but if we do not offer alternatives to the current system, then all we are doing is spreading misery. We desperately need solutions to our woes, and even where these come from sources with an agenda which me may not share, we owe it to ourselves, and those who come after us, to at least examine them.
19 comments:
tnsradio.ning.com is seeking solutions rufus
Intriguing character Muad'Dib aka JAH aka John Anthony Hill. Have a look at his website. He appears to think he's Elijah sent by God to tell us to return to the Law.
http://jahtruth.net/mal4.htm
It was looking through his site that encouraged me to properly research the British/Anglo-Saxon Israel idea. I'm glad I did but I have to say he has a curious, to say the least, take on things. His claims about Islam and the Koran don't stand up and there's plenty of other bizarre stuff as well. See for yourself.
On the subject of his court appearances I've become far too cynical I'm afraid. If the 'authorities' were genuinely concerned about his 7/7 Ripple Effect video why did they seem to go out of their way to draw attention to it. He didn't really break the law in sending it to that judge. Even then they could have ignored it or just given him a verbal warning. Someone I know went to the trial on several days and described his followers as being 'like a cult'. Sorry if I appear negative on this but something doesn't quite add up with JAH. I will give the interview a listen though.
TNS does look interesting. The pictures slideshow with Kate Middleton on a ten pound note was worth the visit alone! I am still chuckling to myself over that one! Thank you for the link. I will certainly look at the site.
Revolution Harry: John Hill's religious views are not to my taste. Anyone who thinks he is on a divine mission is cause for concern. What I find interesting is that he offers ideas which could be workable, and at this stage in events, we need any solutions we can get hold of.
If his interview can shift people from feeling that their is no hope, then that is a good thing. I think that the greatest weapon of the enemy is the apathy they generate through their barely veiled terror tactics, and through their disinfo agents.
In the search for answers to our plight,no stone should be left unturned, but the caution to this must be that we must be very wary of anyone who is convinced that he has all the answers!
Revolution Harry: But, what if he is in fact Elijah, sent by God, to tell us to return to The Law?
We are on the brink of WW3, and the psychopathic NWO people are working full steam ahead to make it happen, because they want to exterminate all of us "useless eaters".
Also, I have to disagree, regarding what you say about his take on the Koran not standing up. Having read both the Koran and the Bible thoroughly myself, my conclusion is that what Muad'dib has to say about it, is absolutely spot on correct and the truth.
The MSN media went out of their way to ignore Muad'Dib and 7/7 Ripple Effect, until they could no longer do it anymore because it went viral and too many people had seen it and were talking about it.
As for the authorities, they obviously wanted to stitch him up for good (while the media was ignoring the case). They tried to keep a lid on it with the media blackout, but eventually it only backfired.
With all that Muad'Dib has steadfastly and consistently put forward over the years, and doing what he does in the world of today... If nothing else, it is at least some serious food for thought...especially in the context of things like the following (which Jesus said):
....in such an hour as YE THINK NOT the Son of Man cometh. Matt. 24:44
....Nevertheless when the Son of Man cometh, shall he find Faith on the earth? Luke 18:8
Anon, it's worth noting that the Bible makes no mention of Elijah returning, only the Koran. Hill's blending of these two books makes no sense at all. In the Bible we read:
"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
I'd go further and say that what Hill claims makes a mockery of the Bible and its message, particularly its prophetic message. Jesus also tells his disciples to 'preach the gospel to the whole creation'. No mention of a later addition in the form of the Koran. Hill's page on the Koran barely scratches the surface of the innumerable anomalies with it and the Bible. Let alone the clear differences in the life and character of Jesus and Muhammed. God in the Bible and Allah are not the same.
Ask yourself this. At this late stage do you think that God would make corrections to His message in the form of a book (upon which, it seems, our life depends) which could only be bought (£10 in the UK and £20 the rest of the world) or downloaded (what if you haven't got a computer?) from one website and in one language? I see the 'Bible' (the Bible plus his version of the Koran) he recommends is in its second print meaning they 'now have 100… of the latest edition to ship' (€50 euros). Apart from any other considerations this doesn't make any sort of sense.
The MSM were never going to acknowledge either Hill or his video. What the actions of the 'authorities' did do though is guarantee widespread and continued coverage throughout the 'alternative' media.
With respect your last two quotes make no sense in the context of JAH and his claims. If there's anything that springs to my mind it's Matthew 24:11.
Solutions to my mental problems are needed.
"Racial purity" is something that ordinary people to a large extent don't consciously think a great deal about. There is perhaps also an awareness that it is a total waste of time thinking about such rubbish.
We all die in the end. Even if racial purity were to be somehow protected, you would still end up dead.
Here's how it is. You are a white heterosexual male, and you:
* have no right to get sex
* will die
* are a member of a race that is on the path to extinction
* can do nothing to change any of these things
Life is shit, isn't it?
Revolution Harry, the Bible explicitly mentions the return of Elijah, on the last page of the Old Testament:
Malachi 4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the "I AM":
4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.
You then give what is your personal opinion. The fact is, JAH's message today is exactly the same message that all of the Bible prophets gave (read them for yourself), thus CONFIRMING the prophetic message of the Bible. So, this too is contrary to what you have said. Perhaps you said what you did in haste, not having all of the information?
You then wrote: “Ask yourself this. At this late stage do you think that God would make corrections to His message in the form of a book (upon which, it seems, our life depends)....
Why not? His other messages (think of the successive Bible prophets, for instance) are in the forms of books, aren't they? Have you read the book yourself, and finished it? If you have not, then I would strongly suggest reading it. If anything, it corrects, points out and removes the numerous false doctrines and superstitious nonsense and lies that have been introduced by organised religions. If you can read it with an open mind, then you should hopefully be able to see this for yourself, and where JAH is coming from with all of this. If not, then that would be your free-will choice.
Since English has become the most widely understood language in the world, it does make sense to me, that this is the language that would be chosen. Besides, if God wants a person to be able to read a Message from Him, then don't you think He would provide all the necessary means and make all the necessary arrangements needed, for that person to be able to do so?
“With respect your last two quotes make no sense in the context of JAH and his claims. If there's anything that springs to my mind it's Matthew 24:11.”
To that, all I will suggest to anyone reading this, is to get the book to study for yourself, and then make up your own mind. It is available free at:
http://TheWayHomeOrFaceTheFire.net
Peace be upon you.
Anon, fair enough. My knowledge of the Bible is still limited and my comment regarding the return of Elijah came from reading Hill's page on his website where he doesn't mention the Malachi verse.
That said I stand by the rest of my comment. In fact I've now had a chance to listen to the interview and that alone should dispel any doubts that 'Jah' is the prophet Elijah returned.
He seems rather confused regarding prophecy. After quoting sections of the Book of Revelation he says that it will be fulfilled but then suggests if we turn up to his demonstration on November 5th it can be avoided.
The date itself is also a bit concerning, as is the association with the film 'V For Vendetta'. The 'November 5th' bomb plot was a Jesuit Catholic/Vatican attempt to overthrow the British parliament. A good thing you might say and Hill certainly has parliament and its MP's down as the enemy. But consider what was intended to replace it. Papal rule from the Vatican? The article linked to below finishes with the lines:
"This country, along with many others, is currently being pushed to the brink of revolution. This is intentional. These degenerate NWO rats know what they're doing, they've done it before. As bad as things are these days, the post-revolution dictatorship is sure to be much worse."
I've no idea if 'JAH' is complicit in these aims but I would say be careful what you wish for and before you break something down be sure you know what it is that will replace it. Apart from anything else the problem lies far deeper than parliament.
The article itself looks at the real message in the film 'V For Vendetta'. Based on the book by occultist and follower of Aleister Crowley, Alan Moore, there's more to this film than is generally understood. Whether 'V' himself is actually Lucifer/Satan is debatable but he does espouse Crowley's Satanic maxim, 'do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law'. Read the article and watch the short video for more details.
http://nwointelreport.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/holywoods-satanic-agenda-22-v-for.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0lDtPdDgJ8
It seems doubtful that God would have his prophet be associated with such blatant anti-Christian propaganda. As an aside I can't help noting that Old Holborn is also fond of 'V' symbolism.
The interview itself had barely any references to the Christian message. I'm sympathetic to the idea that we might be, at least part of, the Israelites of the Bible. I know enough that God wants us (israelites) to repent and return to His ways. If 'Jah' really was a Heaven sent prophet I would have expected a little more focus on this. Instead we get tempted with the idea of becoming 'millionaires'.
Although the idea of each of us having enough land to raise a family and grow our own food sounds tremendous, I suspect that Hill hasn't noticed the exponential rise in immigration in recent years. In short this idea is an impossibility. In fact I'd rather use the confiscated funds of the Queen (or is it really the Crown/City?) to encourage as many immigrants to return to their homelands. Therein lies the problem. How should any wealth be redistributed?
Two final observations. Type 'Hollie Greig hoax' into Google for the other side of that unfortunate story. Also the idea that the EU was 'set up by Nazi's' is a woefully inadequate explanation of its origins to say the least.
I hate to sound too cynical but we have to be very careful of where we are being led and have a clear idea of what it is we actually want. Blind rebellion will get us nowhere or even worse, somewhere we really don't want to be.
Revolution Harry: It does mention Malachi on JAH's page on the same page you mentioned in your original post.
You have the link to JAH's Book, The Way Home or Face The Fire, which contains the answers to all your concerns and questions you put in your post, but if you are not going to make the effort to read it, then there is no point in me trying to convince you of anything or to continue discussing this, because it would unfortunately just be a waste of time.
You have all the info you need; what you do with it now is up to you.
Indeed God wants us all to repent and return to His ways. There I agree with you 100%. That is also exactly what JAH wants, but it appears you are far to cynical to even consider the possibility that JAH might be genuine, or that He might actually know something(s) more than you do. The problem with that kind of attitude, is that it prevents you, from being able to see what is right in front of you.
I hope that you will get past the cynicism, because it is preventing you from being able to find the answers that you are seeking.
Peace be upon you.
PS: Revolution Harry, thank you for the links. You might find the following page of interest, since you mention the Vatican. It should hopefully help to clear up any doubts in that regard:
http://jahtruth.net/darth
Wish you the best, Anon.
Revolution Harry: As pointed out above, it does mention Malachi, on the same page you have mentioned in your original post. So, it is wrong of you to then try and blame your mistake on Hill because it is not Hill's fault that you got it wrong. By doing this, you are only proving that it is YOUR opinions that cannot be trusted. I do not seek to fight with you, but cannot in good conscience let you do that and not point it out to you, for your own sake as well as for the sake of any others that might be reading. You should either admit that it is in fact you that were mistaken about it, or otherwise prove that you were not, because it is either one, or the other.
Yes, it was my mistake. It does reference Malachi. That error does not negate either the contents of my first comment or the observations in my second comment. Indeed the only reason I mentioned it was to highlight the attempt to put the Bible on a par with the Koran.
Based on those observations and with respect, it's my opinion that it is your good self that can't 'see what is right in front of you'. The Bible and its message is all you need. John Hill's attempt to claim otherwise is misguided at best and dangerous at worst. It beggars belief you can seriously claim otherwise. 'JAH' clearly isn't a Heaven sent prophet of God.
I have one small question. In the section about the 'King of Kings' Bible it states:
"The Meccans corrupted the Message that had been given to Mohammed, and the Koran, to turn people away from God's Holy Temple in Jerusalem..."
I'm aware that there was a change from Jerusalem to Mecca within the Koran but the above quote specifically references 'God's Temple'. Surely there was no 'Temple' in existence during Muhammed's day. It had been destroyed in 70AD, as prophesied by Jesus.
As an aside, the various Temples of the Old Testament served as the means by which God communicated with His people but Jesus is clearly the new Temple Of God after the resurrection.
“I tell you, something greater than the temple is here,” (Matthew 12:6)
Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." (John 2:19)
Actually, I have another question. If 'JAH' claims to have the true (uncorrupted by 'the Meccans') version of the Koran, where did he acquire this and why hasn't it been available before now?
Anon, you've caused me to further investigate the subject of Malachi's prophecy concerning Elijah, which I'm grateful for. I'd be interested in your thoughts on this:
And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come? 11 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. 12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. 13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Mat 17:10-13
http://searchinsany.hubpages.com/hub/Will-Elijah-Really-Going-to-Return
There are some elements of the article I don't necessarily subscribe to but it's the main thrust concerning the return of Elijah that is relevant.
Anon: Revolution Harry, please see more below in { }.
Revolution Harry said...
Yes, it was my mistake. It does reference Malachi.
{Agreed.}
That error does not negate either the contents of my first comment or the observations in my second comment. Indeed the only reason I mentioned it was to highlight the attempt to put the Bible on a par with the Koran.
Based on those observations and with respect, it's my opinion that it is your good self that can't 'see what is right in front of you'. The Bible and its message is all you need. John Hill's attempt to claim otherwise is misguided at best and dangerous at worst. It beggars belief you can seriously claim otherwise. 'JAH' clearly isn't a Heaven sent prophet of God.
{JAH explains that everyone needs to keep and live by only God's Laws in the Bible, and then also further about the Koran being known as the “Gospel of Unity”. In it, it tells Muslims to invite Christians and Jews into their homes and to come to common terms with them, to worship only God. The Koran also tells the Muslims that they too need to read the Bible, and learn to keep only God's Laws. Unfortunatly, they are taught lies by the Meccans, who tell them that the true Bible no longer exists, along with being given the Hadith to read. If you give the jahtruth.net site some serious study, then you will find all of these things and much more, explained in great detail.}
I have one small question. In the section about the 'King of Kings' Bible it states:
"The Meccans corrupted the Message that had been given to Mohammed, and the Koran, to turn people away from God's Holy Temple in Jerusalem..."
I'm aware that there was a change from Jerusalem to Mecca within the Koran but the above quote specifically references 'God's Temple'. Surely there was no 'Temple' in existence during Muhammed's day. It had been destroyed in 70AD, as prophesied by Jesus.
{“God's Temple” or “The House of God” refers to Mount Moriah. It is the exact spot where Abraham was willing to offer his miracle son Isaac to God, thereby causing that piece of ground to become the most holy spot on Earth. The Temple building was then built over that spot later on. For more details about this, please see
http://jahtruth.net/kaba.htm
which includes many relevant Bible references about it.}
Continued:
As an aside, the various Temples of the Old Testament served as the means by which God communicated with His people but Jesus is clearly the new Temple Of God after the resurrection.
“I tell you, something greater than the temple is here,” (Matthew 12:6)
Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." (John 2:19)
{He said that something greater than the temple is here, not that He is the new temple. In the verse quoted from John, He was obviously referring to His body. “Your body is your temple”. Therefore, you do not need to go to church.}
Actually, I have another question. If 'JAH' claims to have the true (uncorrupted by 'the Meccans') version of the Koran, where did he acquire this and why hasn't it been available before now?
21 September 2012 23:21
Revolution Harry said...
Anon, you've caused me to further investigate the subject of Malachi's prophecy concerning Elijah, which I'm grateful for.
{Understood.}
I'd be interested in your thoughts on this:
And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come? 11 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. 12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. 13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Mat 17:10-13
{When He spoke of Elias, He was referring to Elisha. Please see 2 kings 2.}
http://searchinsany.hubpages.com/hub/Will-Elijah-Really-Going-to-Return
There are some elements of the article I don't necessarily subscribe to but it's the main thrust concerning the return of Elijah that is relevant.
{Understood. As above.
Lastly, may I recommend taking the time to listen to the interviews at:
http://jahtruth.net/radio.htm
Then consider that those 3 radio shows were done around 11 years ago, with two of them broadcast before 9/11 and then the last one shortly after 9/11. But at that time, few took any notice. But now, it has been over 10 years since and looking at the world today, and at what has happened over the past decade, it is plain to see that what JAH tried to warn everyone about back then, has been coming true IN SPADES... If anything, those radio shows were nothing short of PROPHETIC, and the proof is in the pudding if you look at the world today.
God Bless, Anon.}
Revolution Harry: One more thing I meant to include in the replies above, was this:
Revolution Harry said:
'JAH' clearly isn't a Heaven sent prophet of God.
{How do you know? Are you sure, or could it be possible that you may be wrong about it, like you were wrong about Malachi? Either way, even if
you have that opinion, it is not possible for you to prove it, so that
statement cannot be taken as fact and therefore it is only your opinion.}
"…thereby causing that piece of ground to become the most holy spot on Earth."
This seems an amazing claim. Where's your evidence for it? So you're saying that God's Temple on earth is Mt. Moriah even to this day? Despite the fact that he destroyed the Temple that stood on that spot. Never to be rebuilt. If it's the 'most holy spot on earth' I wonder why Jesus choose Mt Zion to stand with the 144,000 on his return?
The overwhelming consensus among Bible scholars is that Elias is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Elijah. If you differ from everyone else where is the evidence for your claim? Is there a prophecy that Elisha would return? If there is I couldn't find it.
I also note you didn't respond to my question regarding how 'JAH' received the 'true' interpretation of the Koran. I have read a great deal of the 'jahtruth' site and didn't come across anything that answered it.
The point Jesus was making was exactly that He was the new Temple. That's why the old Temple was destroyed and has never been rebuilt. It was completely unnecessary after Jesus' crucifixion.
As for JAH being a Heaven sent prophet of God. Yes, I'm sure, I have given it some thought and of course it can only ever be my opinion. An opinion reached after considering all the relevant facts.
Social Creditors have been all but wiped from the history of Britain.
FACT: The Greenshirt numbers far outnumbered those of the Blackshirts.
The BUF tried to usurp the Social Credit ideas as their own, perhaps a ploy by Kosher Mosley to discredit the Creditors on behalf of the Establishment.
Fly on Shit!
Post a Comment