World Government pushing to silence on-line dissidents

Today, the International Telecommunications Union conference on Internet Censorship is in full flow.  The so-called World Congress on Internet Technology, has as its agenda, the control of the Internet, no matter what its apologists say..  The ITU is a branch of the United Nations, and as such it speaks with the same forked tongue as its parent body.  Resolution 69 demands that:

"Member States.. refrain from taking any unilateral and/or discriminatory actions that could impede another Member State from accessing public Internet sites".

All well and good?  Not really.  The ITU is a governmental body and to that end it does not represent the people; only the bureaucrats who preside over them.  Resolution 69 is classic double speak.  Whilst appearing to oppose policies which restrict Internet access, the keyword in the Resolution is 'Unilateral'.  Hiding behind well-sounding words, the gist of the Resolution is for a coordination of censorship measures, which will end Internet freedom, but do so in a manner which the controlled media will ignore, and which the puppet politicians will deny.

Why does the UN wish to control the Internet?  The Internet has become a source of embarrassment for our enemies.  The incredible speed with which the Climate Change / Carbon Tax issue was exposed must have seriously rankled those who were relying upon their fraudulent science to usher in the One World Taxation System and the One World Army to enforce it.  Then of course there is the whole Al Qaeda and Wahhabi Islam phenomenon which was designed to justify the eradication of sovereign nations which did not tow the International line.  For the bogeymen of 9/11 to be outed as the footsoldiers of the Internationalists, must have made the powers that be very angry indeed.  The Internet was also used to counter the anti-Libyan lies, and to thereby hamper the proposed invasion of Syria; sadly the foul plan against Syria is likely to go ahead anyway, but those behind it have been forced to work against a growing and vocal global popular opposition to this madness.  Our enemies are megalomaniacs and ultimately they are so arrogant that they cannot abide being told 'No!'  The Internet has become a thorn in their sides, and so the easiest way for them to counter the opposition, is to control our main information tool.

Everyone who has participated in the On-line Resistance, has to however small or large an extent, helped to forestall the plans of our enemies.  Countless lives have already been saved, and inhuman policies have been restricted.  If the Resistance had not worked so hard against our common foe, we would already be in the global gulag, not looking at its building blocs.  For that matter, Gaza would now be a district of Israel, and the recent rejoicing at the defeat of the IDF would not have been heard in the fully Zionised territory.

So, what should we do now?  Should we wait for the censors to silence our means of attack, then give up?  Not at all.  Now is the time to gather as much information as possible, and to save it on devices which are not connected to the Internet at all.  The end of the Free Internet may not be imminent, but it is coming.  Technology already exists which allows for remote access to computers, for the purpose of planting 'evidence' of crimes, and for deleting files.  This cannot be done with computers which are never on-line and are not Wi-Fi capable, and so it is in our interests to ensure that we have back-up machines which our enemies cannot remotely access.  We should be doing this now, and not waiting until it is too late.

If the Internet becomes a fully-controlled medium, what then?  Certainly this will make our efforts harder, but it will not stop us.  There are means to be in contact with comrades which do not require the Internet; we must use them.  The old-fashioned printed news-sheet may not reach as many people as the on-line version, but it still does the job; even more-so if we work in small groups to spread the information far and wide.  In the past, our fore-runners did not have the technology we have, but they still fought against the despots and occupiers.  But for their struggle, we would already have lost.  Strength does not require vast numbers of activists, only a core of determined and innovative ones.

The people at the ITU who wish to silence what we can say and see, are the same ones who wish to blanket the globe in CCTV.  The enemy does not wish us to be informed, but it is adamant that it is informed of everything about us.  'Our' governments are nothing of the sort.  They constitute an Occupation Regime, which may call itself 'left' in one country or 'right' in another; ultimately they serve the same masters and thus are a unified enemy who we can identify, and fight.  If a country was invaded by an army, who then set out building a CCTV network to monitor our every move, would it not be justified to destroy that network in order to protect our people?  In truth, would it not be unjustifiable to do nothing should the opportunity arise to damage the equipment of the enemy forces?  We live in lands which are occupied by our mortal foes; yes the people who enforce their will are our kin, but then there will always be collaborators who are such vermin as to take the pay of the oppressors and brutalise their own kind.  We need to re-evaluate our relationship with the State, its lackeys and their surveillance technology, and to treat collaborators as one would the enemy itself.

The ITU conference is an opportunity for us to consider how we would continue the struggle if the Internet was effectively gone.  We need to take the battle to the real world in any case.  This conference should not cause despair, but rather enliven us with the knowledge that the enemy is worried, and that it is seeking to silence us because we are making a difference.  Let that knowledge bolster us, and enable us to build our own networks off-line, where we can take the fight to the enemy itself.  A little imagination can create a wealth of propaganda to awaken our people tom our common plight.  Let the danger to the Internet embolden us to act where it matters; off-line in the real world.