Civic Nationalism: An Establishment Trap

In Europe, we have a federal government comprised of fake Socialists in the service of International Finance.  These commissars of political correctness are duplicated through the bureaucracy of government in every country.  In the UK, the liberals and Marxists infest every level of the civil service, public services and government administration (including the indoctrination of the next generation in the school system).  Having completely taken over every branch of the State, the greatest coup of the enemy has been to so bamboozle elements of the resistance, that people who should be with us in the fight against the internationalist destruction of freedom, are falling over one another in a rush to adopt the ideology of the enemy, in a vain struggle to achieve 'respectability' and acceptance from the Establishment's media arms.  This strategy is futile, and counter-productive.

The anti-Islamic pressure group - the English Defence League - has an ideology based solely on halting the rise of Islam in the UK.  They have no coherent policy with regards to the causes of the rise in alien religions in Europe; they are only concerned with addressing one particular symptom of the malaise affecting our lands.  For the EDL, multiculturalism is a good thing, and should the millions of Muslim colonists abandon their religion, all the problems afflicting the UK would be over!  

The half-baked ideology which can be found in EDL propaganda material is epitomised by the obsession with imagery of European women dressed like whores, juxtaposed against Islamic women in burkas, with words to the effect that Islam denies women the right to behave like unpaid prostitutes and forces them into the servitude of monogamy.  The EDL, as good Civic Nationalists, fully accept the Talmudic disease of feminism and sexual liberation, and the destruction of family which ultimately results from such Cultural Marxism.   Perhaps it is the frustration of not being able to get any woman to look twice at them which inspires EDL imbeciles to promote the debasement of all women, or maybe they have a fetish for race-mixing, especially with women of Pakistani origin?  

Although hidden behind an anti-Islamic front, the agenda of those who control the EDL is to make the colonists adopt the attitudes of the indigenous population, and to make the indigenous population adopt the ideology of the international enemy.  The wearing of burkas is certainly alien to Europe, but so is the reduction of our people to promiscuous materialistic sexual deviants.  The EDL like to call themselves Infidels, which is most appropriate with regards to an inability of maintaining Fidelity in their relationships with the opposite sex.  These people are casualties of the Establishment, and a part of the problem.  There is nothing wrong with dressing modestly, with being loyal to one's spouse and with putting family first.  By attacking Islam for defending values which are shared by indigenous Europe, the EDL rather than Defending England, is at the vanguard of the Talmudic assault against all of Europe, and indeed all parts of the world which put value upon morality and decency.

Civic Nationalism is a sickness which has steadily crept into the political body of Europe.  In the UK, the school system includes lessons in 'citizenship', which teach children how to be good citizens of the country.  Why would people need to learn how be be citizens of their own land?  They wouldn't.  The very existence of Citizenship Lessons is due to the internationalisation of our lands.  The educational emphasis upon tolerance and reasonableness, directly conflicts with organic and natural feelings of cultural and ethnic identity.  When Citizenship has to be taught, it is an act of social engineering to destroy that which is innate and healthy, substituting it with an ideology which benefits the International parasites.  Civic Nationalism, wherever it is found, is the promotion of the agenda of the enemy.

In our troubled countries, those who defend the people have become the target of the Occupation regime.  Civic Nationalists are a fifth column residing amongst our people.  They use the slogans of resistance, but blend them with expressions of allegiance to the Establishment.  Civic Nationalists are collaborators with the enemy of the people.

According to the lunacy of Civic Nationalism, ethnic origins mean nothing.  If a Khazar expresses devotion to the Crown, then he is one of us.  If a colonist obeys the laws of the State and pays taxes to the Establishment, then he is welcome.  By this logic, those who expose the Windsor mafia  as financial parasites and despots, are 'traitors' to the State.  Indigenous people who do not support the police; refuse to give their children to the official school system; do not accept the imposition of multiculturalism; have their own values which stand opposed to the moral disintegration of the nation; oppose war for international finance; reject the Banking system and the Stock Market economy; support the right of Palestinians to their own land and reject the bandit 'state' of Israel; refuse to accept the new faith of Holocaustianity; trade with one another in a manner which denies the State tax revenue...; all these people - by the logic of Civic Nationalism - should be treated as enemies of the country, but flag-waving aliens should be welcomed.  

Civic Nationalism is nothing but State Worship and cowardly acquiescence to the International Order, hidden behind mealy-mouthed slogans which mean nothing when considered alongside the actions of those who speak them.  When the State is at war with the indigenous population, Civic Nationalism should be seen for what it is; allegiance to the forces of the enemy, and betrayal of the people.

Civic Nationalism is but another aspect of the creeping indifference of a people subjugated by their enemies.  We tolerate the intolerable at the risk of losing everything we hold dear.  Being 'reasonable' and 'non-judgemental' can only lead to our own cultural death.  We need to stand up for what is right, and to stop cowering out of fear of causing offence.  As GK Chesterton put it, 

'Tolerance is the attitude of those who do not beleive in anything'.

If we tolerate everything, then we will surely be destroyed by those who have belief in their ideas. This is exactly what is happening.  The Cultural Marxists, the befuddled hippies and the liberal do-gooders have gained the upper hand because people have been too polite to tell them that their ideas are not acceptable.  The knee jerk reactionaries who only attack the symptoms of our downfall fail to appreciate the root causes.  The monarchists and aristocracy-lovers cannot bring themselves to accept that the Ruling Class of the UK is in reality a Ruling Caste separated from the rest of us by a genetic heritage linking them to the Khazars of the Caucasus and the Sephardim of Asian origin.  Civic Nationalism is a gift to such people, allowing them to continue supporting the Establishment, in the belief that from within the ranks of the 'elite' will come the salvation to our woes.  It will not.  The Establishment is so riddled with ideological and ethnic enemies of Europe, that nothing short of its total eradication will help us.

What we need is a revolution of the mind; a revolution which demands the union of thought and deed.  We must expose those who claim to fight the International menace, but cloak themselves in the garb of Zionism, respectability and tolerance.  We need to seek a restoration of all peoples to their own lands, and an end to the economic and military policies of government which created the conditions for mass migration away from the sacred homelands of all who have been used as human fodder for the construction of the multi-culti global materialistic gulag.  Most importantly, we have to stop tolerating people of our own kin who spout the drivel of liberalism.  The enemy within is the greatest obstacle to freedom.  As the late Jonathan Bowden stated,

'If the civilization which their ancestors created has any future at all then they must overcome their resistance to barbarism; they must o’erleap it on the altar of high culture....Truthfully, in this age those with intellect have no courage and those with some modicum of physical courage have no intellect. If things are to alter during the next fifty years then we must re-embrace Byron’s ideal: the cultured thug.'