Friday, 11 January 2013

Democracy is a sham. Real change comes from elsewhere

Eddy Morrison, the author of Nationalist Sentinel, has written the following post:

British Democratic Party - a bolt hole for the BNP drop outs


I have just submitted a fairly long critique to the nascent BDP website. To sum it up, I view this fourth party to be called the BDP as yet another populist failure - its only difference to the 'now is history' BNP is that though it hasn't got Griffin it still has all his ideological baggage.

Populism reigns supreme and men who should know FAR BETTER such as my long term friend Andrew Brons should know better!


Andrew your home is back in the Front where you were once Chairman and have spent most of your political life. Getting into bed with with this Frankenstein created hotch potch of failures is a drastic mistake and a road to nowhere.


It will have all the appeal of a discarded Big Mac and I can GUARANTEE compulsory repatriation and calls for some Black and Jewish members will be a certainty......I am telling you before time does......Eddy

Eddy does not allow comments on his blog, so I will place my response to his post here.

All who are actively supporting one faction of the absurdly splintered Nationalist movement in the UK, against the others are wasting their time, and falling prey to a well-crafted Establishment trap.  The same applies to every country in the European world, where in-fighting takes up so much time and effort, that the International Enemy can rush through its assault on humanity, safe in the knowledge that those who oppose its machinations are so bogged down in the minutiƦ of ideology, that they cannot offer a workable resistance to their plans.

For those outside the UK, the Front to which Eddy refers, is the National Front (NF).  The name has become psychologically linked with the Holocaustian religion, and is as likely to repel the brain-washed majority of television-viewing voters as would a poster of corpses and a slogan of 'next year six million more!'  Yes I know the Holyhoax is complete propaganda and lies, but Joe Public has been subjected to the lie for 7 decades; many people believe that the BBC soap opera, 'Eastenders' is real, such is the power of the idiot box. 

We don't need parties.  The way forward is for independent candidates to stand on policies alone, and not as representatives of parties.  At present we have the BNP, NF, BDP, etc etc standing for the same seats and by so doing splitting any anti-Internationalist vote.  We need to reach an agreement whereby no genuine 'Nationalist' will stand against another.  A hard task certainly, but better than continuing to use the same strategy which has failed so consistently, for so long.

Democracy is a sham.  If we must have parties, then we need real community action to garner well-deserved support, like undertaken by the Golden Dawn who feed the indigenous hungry in Greece.  Mass poverty is gripping our people, but the parties who profess to stand for the people are nowhere to be seen.  Making speeches in pubs to rapturous applause, then doing nothing for the people, is a waste of hot air, and is inexcusable.

A street presence of zero, and rigid party politics cannot change anything.  We have lost London, Luton, Leicester, Slough, and are close to losing more of our towns and cities to mass immigration.  If we are to halt our demise, and indeed to reverse the destruction of all we hold dear, then we have to face the reality that playing the Establishment game benefits no-one except the scum in the Establishment who collect our hard earned money which we foolishly give them in the form of election deposits.  Enough is enough!  Ground Hog Day has to come to an end!

Eddy is quite correct that due to the Establishment rules governing the composition of registered political parties, there must be non-indigenous members, and Jew-friendly policies.  Populism is enshrined in the political system of the UK, and cannot be avoided by anyone who accepts the authority of the Establishment to dictate the structure of parties.  The BNP under Nick Gri££in played the Establishment game and became just as corrupt as its counterparts in Westminster; discrediting the entire 'Nationalist' opposition to Internationalism, and damaging others in the process.  Those who play the Party game, cannot avoid the enforced multi-culturalism and populism which is built into it.

Why would anyone even wish to be a part of a registered party? The time when like-minded individuals could gather together unmolested by the State is long over.  Registered parties have to keep membership lists, which the State is entitled to look at whenever it sees fit.  What better way to gather information about who stands against the Establishment and its Internationalist multi-culti programme?  Additionally, party funds have to be declared to the State, thus giving the enemy an accurate assessment of the finances of those who oppose them (assuming of course that the Parties aren't riddled with Statists to begin with).

Networking is a vital part of the Resistance, but belonging to 'Parties' is not.  Why not band together under politically anonymous means such as Sports Associations or any other recreational interest groups.  If we have to apply labels to ourselves, then we should make them ones which the Establishment cannot profit from.  We are treated as criminals anyway.  We need to think of ourselves as separate from the rotting corpse of the Establishment and abandon all illusions of ever becoming part of the mainstream by playing to their rules.  Why anyone would wish to become 'respectable' in the eyes of people who routinely abuse the Media, Education system, and Care Home system to procure children for the pƦdophiles in power, is beyond fathomable.  We need to build a complete counter culture which will destroy and replace the old order entirely and not be contaminated through contact with it.

Anyone who has ever been to a political meeting of a non-multi culti organisation, will know that there has to be a whole circus of security hoops to jump through before even getting to the rendezvous point, let alone the secret meeting location.  This security system is necessary due to the willingness of the political police to close meetings and arrest people for public order offences as soon as their goons in the Marxist front groups (UAF, ANL et al) discover their locations and attack them.  One such meeting was attacked by organised Marxists, who threw an axe through the window of the pub, above which the meeting was held.  The police prevented anyone leaving the building until their fellow-internationalist filth in the 'anti-Fascist' movement had fled, then proceeded to arrest those who had been attacked!  This is quite typical of the Marxist-police cooperation in Zionist-occupied Britain. Had the meeting not been held by a registered organisation, the police would have found it much harder to persecute those present.  Playing the game is setting oneself up for the tyranny of the enemy.

We cannot beat the system by being a part of it, only by being apart from it.  There is no valid reason for anyone joining a registered party and thereby giving his or her details directly to the enemy.  We can (and must) organise without their official documents giving us permission to do so! Why does anyone even wish to achieve official permission from the enemy to act against them?  This is especially perplexing when one considers that the conditions attached for their permission is our acceptance of their authority to determine who can join our organisations and which ideas we can discuss; hence our total submission.  Let the Civic Nationalists cuddle up to the enemy and by so doing become an identifiable part of the problem.  Let the Resistance forge ahead under the cover of anonymity and wrestle freedom from the clutches of our eternal foe.  We are in a war for our very survival.  Handing the enemy all the information it requires to ensure the opposition remains powerless, is not very intelligent, and cannot achieve anything other than our total defeat.

A very important book outlining the Cell Structure which can be employed to organise and conduct actions against the enemy, is the Nest leaders Manual by Corneliu Z Codreanu.  Download it here.  All tools which aid our struggle, need to be utilised.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting article, surprised to see Eddy blogging again, even mentioned a new magazine which I rather suspect will be a re-run of his imitation Spearhead disaster which embarrassed the NF & left his foolhardy subscribers out of pocket.

Anonymous said...

"White nationalism" is something that seems totally unworkable. Let's see:

The left despises the idea of "white nationalism";
Non-whites similarly dislike the idea;
Businesses don't want "white nationalism";
And even most ordinary white people are either opposed to the idea, or at least indifferent for the most part. Sure there are people who whinge about immigrants and so on, but what is far-right politics other than impotent grumbling?

Furthermore, what is "racism" other than the desire to prevent white women from choosing non-white men as husbands, boyfriends, sex partners?

Speeches in pubs? There are loads of videos of Arthur Kemp speaking on YouTube...

I don't think anything like Golden Dawn would ever make much progress in the UK.

...

In short, I think absolutely nothing can be done to make the UK, or any other European country, completely white again. I have always felt this actually - I have always felt that halting and reversing the demographic changes that are taking place (i.e. the gradual transformation of the ethnic makeup of our countries from white into non-white) is completely and totally unrealistic. A pipe dream if there ever was one.

DC said...

Couldn't agree more Rufus, and I'm glad to say I see many coming to this conclusion. The Establishment will be shitting themselves soon when they realise people have lost faith in their so-called 'Democracy'. That's when the real games begin.

I am aware of a potential group emerging with these ideas in mind. It is in its very early stages, but whatever its trajectory it is symbolic of a wider psychological change.