David Icke - Closet Internationalist

David Icke is a controversial figure, who courts criticism, but at the same time produces much valuable work exposing the internationalists and their financial strategy for the creation of a single global slave state. He mixes verifiable evidence exposing the international enemy, with pseudo-spiritual material which cannot be scrutinised other than according to the beliefs held by whoever examines them.  He also supports the long exposed Zionist Shill and Holocaustian, Alex Jones.  For anyone who purports to fight against the lies of the Establishment to associate themselves with a known gate-keeper and fear-mongerer, raises serious questions.

David Icke was at the forefront of the campaign to expose the pædophiles in the BBC, Westminster, and Windsor family.  His unrelenting assault of the likes of former Prime Minister, Edward Heath, are truly praise-worthy.  Likewise, Icke's focus upon the Rothschild dynasty has certainly helped to highlight the economic tactics of those who would enslave us all.  Indeed, by separating the natural and laudable Jewish Nationalism (Zionism) from the supremacist ideology of the Elders (Rothschild Zionism), Icke has paved the way for Jewish Nationalists to march side-by-side with others who have no truck with the plan to reduce everyone outside the global elite to serfs for the new overlords.  Of course, Icke doesn't delve into the Talmudic origin of the supremacist ideology of the 'Rothschild Zionists' and so exaggerates the number of ordinary Jews who believe themselves to be Chosen by their god to aid humanity as a whole, rather than to look down upon the Goyim in the manner of an insect to be crushed.  According to Icke, the Rothschild Zionists are the real danger, and the superstitious religious Jews who comprise the overwhelming number of Jews in the world, are harmless.  There are problems with this point of view.  However, the attempt to free the Jews from their Elders, thus breaking their support network, is at least worthwhile.

Whilst Icke has to be praised for his work exposing the financial aspects of the enemy, he embraces the New Age ideology that 'we are all one'.  This is a major problem.  In an article on his website, he published a video of the daily ceremony for the closure of the border between Pakistan and India.  The article can be found at the following link, which even in its title betrays Icke's hostility to the cultural integrity of any country: 

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/79485-i-cannot-tell-you-how-much-how-utterly-how-totally-how-absolutely-completely-to-the-core-of-my-being-i-wish-that-what-you-are-about-to-see-is-a-joke-but-to-my-eternal-despair-it-isnt

With astounding arrogance, Icke goes on to ridicule the cultural ceremony enacted by India and Pakistan; comparing it to Monty Python's Ministry of Silly walks.   Clearly for Icke, culture is irrelevant.  Culture, alongside ethnic homogeneity, is the very backbone of free nations.  Without that which makes us distinct, we are nothing but economic units at the mercy of the internationalists.  As if to emphasise his contempt for any expression of nationhood, he makes the comment,

'A word of advice ... just shut the frickin' gate, say goodbye, see you tomorrow tell the people watching not to be such a bunch of prats and then go home for your tea. Even better, don't shut the gate at all and just realise that we are all ONE.'

This is pure internationalism.  Icke advocates having no borders, and embracing a universalistic world view, in which everyone is equal, we are all the same, culture is a social construct to enslave us, we are all the same beneath the skin etc etc.  Although arguing against the 'New World Order' in nearly every article and presentation he makes, by embracing the idea that we are all the same, he embraces the very Cultural Marxism he purports to be against.

In another news item linked from his website, Icke applauds the rule of International Law!  Rather than demanding that the 'Israelis' leave Palestine and return to Khazaria, or relocate to Birobidjan, simply because they have no right to dwell upon Palestinian soil, the article cites International Law as the reason for Israel to relocate.  The article is not one of Icke's, but by linking it, he clearly endorses the right of the global elite to rule over peoples and territories due to the legal power they have given themselves. 

Icke has been criticised for his material relating to 'inter-dimensional shape-shifting reptilians' operating on a lower vibrational level of reality than humanity.   Substitute 'reptilians' for 'dæmons', and one can find a wealth of historical and mythological literature which indicates that what we perceive as reality is only a fraction of what exists.  Indeed, the path from dæmons to 'extra-terrestrials' to reptilians, is but a continuous redefinition of a phenomena which has been described throughout history.  It is not Icke's Reptilian theory which should cause concern, but his Universalism.  Whereas the reptile issue can be ignored, Icke's universalism can not.  Those who follow Icke are in danger of supporting the Internationalists without even realising they are doing so.  What better way to manage the opposition, than to lead it? 

Dismissing Icke's research would be to 'throw the baby out with the bath water'.  Perhaps this is the purpose of the sprinkling of dubious esoterica into otherwise useful material.  Is he a gate-keeper, or does he genuinely believe that differences in the material realm do not matter?  For someone who ceaselessly attacks religion, Icke is certainly operating from a spiritual perspective.  Regardless of his expressed outlook, Icke's Universalism leads directly to an acceptance of Internationalism; if Culture, Nation, Race, Land, Blood and Soil etc are meaningless, then what is there to fight for?  If we are all One, and this reality is a holographic illusion, then why bother to fight the common enemy at all?  Indeed, would that not make our oppressors one with us, thus making resistance to their machinations, resistance to our selves?  Would it not be a case of fighting shadows, such as in Plato's Allegory of the Cave?  For Icke to dismiss what makes us unique, yet simultaneously to argue against the International menace, is disingenuous and mutually-contradictory.

I like Icke.  I can ignore his more bizarre theories; such as the Moon being a spaceship.  I can turn a blind eye to his shameless claim to have invented the Hegelian Dialectic (or as he calls is, Problem, Reaction Solution).  Icke's ability to side-step the Holyhoax and blatant refusal to discuss the central lie upon which the whole international edifice is built, can be rationalised by arguing that should he discuss the fake Holocaust then he would be stopped from discussing anything important - although this argument is increasingly untenable when one considers that exposing the Holyhoax lie is vital to breaking the Talmudic stranglehold, and also considering that he freely taunts the monarchy on a daily basis, with no repercussions. When Icke pushes the nonsense that we are all one, and that expressions of cultural integrity should be stopped, then he embraces the very internationalism he claims to oppose.  

I was in two minds whether to write an article critical of David Icke, but when I see the direction he is herding his followers, then regardless of whether his intentions are benign or malicious, silence is no longer an option.  Would are enemies plant leaders in the Resistance, knowing that they could thereby stifle any real dissent?  Of course they would.  When Icke mocks the solution to internationalism - national freedom and deeper cultural unity with blood and soil - this has to be confronted.  Maybe he is genuine but misguided, and so may depart from this nonsense.  I certainly hope so, although I am less convinced with each passing day.  In the end, we don't need leaders, and the less we rely on others the better.  A led-opposition can be controlled and manipulated.