The UK is a Pædophile State; enforced by a nonce's legal system

The UK is controlled by pædophiles who despise the people they rule over.  For anyone who cares to take notice of the behaviour of the Establishment towards children, this is self evident.  The school system is designed to sexualise children; the media - especially the 'pop' music industry - takes every opportunity to promote sex to children at ever younger ages; fashion teaches girls to dress as prostitutes; the legal system then throws a few degenerates into prison, but largely ensures that those who destroy the lives of children are treated with extreme leniency.

The Jimmy Savile scandal which finally broke into the public arena recently was a white wash to draw attention away from the pædophiles in the fraudulent puppet government and the real Establishment which controls the country.  A handful of 'celebrities' were thrust into the spotlight in order to take attention away from the people who hold power over us; the people who rape us economically every day, and who have amongst them literal rapists who prey on children and those who cannot defend themselves.

'West' Yorkshire Police (those who brutalise the central part of the dismembered West Riding - the fictitious non-county and insult to our heritage which the enemy call West Yorkshire) is a police force which has come under a limited degree of scrutiny due to Jimmy Savile living in Leeds.  The Establishment's most well-known procurer of children for sexual abuse, Savile had a very cosy relationship with the police, having weekly parties for the bootboys of the State.  The police have made the ludicrous statement that they did not know that Savile was a pædophile, and that he was in no way shielded by them.  Considering that the police themselves were amongst his customers, it is more likely that some of those who visited his Roundhay home were themselves child abusers, and that they kept him safe in return for access to children.  Since Savile is dead and the police are well-known for looking after their own, it is highly unlikely that we will ever know just what disgusting deals were done with Savile.  The neighbouring North Yorkshire police are just as bad - indeed it is hard to find any police in the UK who are not total scum.

Is it unfair to accuse the men and women of the law of wrong-doings?  Not at all.  In a district of the metropolitan area of the West Riding, there is a woman who is living on welfare benefits, but always has designer clothes, and drives a very expensive car.  She has a daughter who dresses in clothes which would suit a red light district, but are not appropriate for a primary school child.  The woman is a prostitute.  She has a constant flow of customers to her home, mostly Pakistani men, but also a good number of White skinheads.  Everyone knows that she is a whore and that she is prostituting her daughter, but the police will do nothing about this.  Why?  Could it be because her father is a serving police officer, and that the skinheads who visit are his colleagues?  The rot in the police is astounding, but then considering that they are the militia of the Establishment, not surprising.

In the UK, there is a legal requirement for convicted pædophiles and rapists to be registered as such, in order to protect children from them.  Such is the level of decadence in the UK, that pædophiles can have their names removed from the Sex Offenders' Register simply be stating that they won't abuse children again!  If they go on to ruin more children's lives - which most do - then that is just too bad!  The whole point of the Sex Offenders' Register is to deter pædophiles from attacking the young by scaring them with the reality that should they do so, they will be publicly named and be prevented from ever having access to those they prey on.  In the Culturally Marxist mess which is the UK, this is against the human rights of the perverts, and to hell with the rights of children to not be molested.  Who decides who should be removed from the Sex Offenders' Register?  Why are old friends, the police - and not even high level ones!

The politically correct shock troops of the Establishment proved absolutely useless in stopping Savile destroying children over several decades, but they are ruthlessly efficient in ensuring pædophiles and rapists are allowed to hide their atrocities from the public.  In my own area, there is a pædophile who routinely goes to a public park full of children.  The police  have installed CCTV on his house and have regular patrols due to his presence.  These are not to ensure that our children are safe from this monster, but to ensure that he does not meet with an accident which would end his perversion forever.  Our children are not safe to play in their own streets and parks, but the pædophile is well protected.

It is not only the police who protect those who should by rights be executed for their crimes, the legal system in its entirety is geared up to look after them.  Barrister Barbara Hewson publicly stated that the media should not be drawing attention to pædophiles, even in the limited way which ignores the scum in charge of the country.  She stated that the legal age of consent should be dropped from 16 to 13, thus allowing for degenerates to gain access to younger victims.  As is the practice with the age of consent as it stands, the legal cut off point at which sex with a minor becomes a criminal offence, is not rigorously enforced, thus making children under 16 vulnerable to predators.  To drop the age of consent to 13 would realistically lower the enforced age to pre-teen levels.  The sickening Barbara Hewson labelled teenage girls as whores and the men who prey on them as victims.  She commented:

"Some girls more mature more quickly than others, and some teenage girls are anything but wallflowers...The UK has the one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancy in Europe, and most underage sexual activity is with other teens. As the recent Asian procuring cases such as those in Rochdale show, the existing age of consent doesn’t appear to deter really nasty predatory behavior, though such extreme cases are atypical."

Hewsons mentality is not untypical of those in the legal system.  She does not question why children feel they must have sex at ever younger ages, not for a moment considering the negative impact of the fashion industry, television and above all pop music, which teaches children that promiscuity is a sign of maturity, and that celibacy is old-fashioned and uncool.  She does not consider that the promotion of sex in sex education classes is of the 'monkey see monkey do' category, and that the constant promotion of 'experimenting' with same sex relationships, miscegenation and all other politically correct dogma only exacerbates this.  Rather than suggesting the age of consent be lowered, the responsible attitude is to demand it be raised back to 21, and that those who offend be punished with the full force of the law, up to and including with the death penalty.  The wishy-washy libertine attitude of Hewson is indicative of the degeneracy of the UK legal system as a whole.

The laissez-faire attitude of Barrister Hewson is far from isolated.  Lord Lane, the Lord Chief Justice and second highest judge in the land reduced the prison sentence of a convicted pædophile to just six months.  The pervert in question, Oliver Brooke, former head of pædiatrics at St George's Hospital, Tooting, London, had used his position to procure pictures of young children, which he then circulated amongst fellow pædophiles.  Each photograph was the result of a child being abused, and each was proof of an atrocity against an innocent.  Lord Lane stated that:

'It is not inappropriate, perhaps, in view of the puerility of this type of behaviour, to compare it rather to a schoolboy collecting cigarette cards in olden times, because the duplicates were handed on to other adults, three of four of them only, who were likewise minded to indulge in this sort of puerility. To that extent the distribution was by no means of the most vicious sort...It is perfectly plain from those, (the testimonials read out about Brooke) that we are dealing here with someone who, apart from these offences, was an unusually fine man.'

To the second highest judge in the UK, the procuring, duplication and distribution of child pornography is comparable with the collection of cigarette cards, and the man brought before him is a perfect gentleman (apart from his proclivity for sexually desiring children!)  This was not a recent case, which shews that the arrogance of those who consider themselves better than the rest of us, and thus having some God-given right to tell us how to think and act, is far from new.

This week the artist, Graham Ovenden, was found guilty of child abuse by Plymouth Crown Court.  Commenting that the artist had suffered a blow top his reputation, the judge in Plymouth gave Ovenden a suspended sentence, meaning that he has not been punished at all.  Clearly the abuse of children doesn't matter to those in high places.

It is not solely young girls who are preyed upon by the scum in this country.  Men and boys are equally endangered by the corrupt and degenerate misrulers of the UK.  The Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, Nigel Evans, has been implicated in the rape of men.  He is still a serving Member of Parliament, still taking his wage from the taxpayer, and still at liberty.  The accusation of rape is clearly not of great importance in Westminster. 

The homosexual rights advocate Peter Tatchell was lambasted for suggesting that the age of consent be lowered to 14.  However, to take the time to read what he actually suggested rather than to take a reactionary position based on hearsay, Tatchell argued for an end to the prosecution of 14 to 16 year olds who have sex with people of a similar age group, differing by no more than three years and not falling under the age of 14.  Children should not be having sex at 14, and those who wield influence such as Peter Tatchell, should use their influence to discourage it.  However, Tatchell's argument is far more acceptable than that of Barbara Hewson who has no problem with old men having sex with 13 year olds; it is far more acceptable than Lord Lane's view that child pornography is just a hobby and is harmless; it is far more acceptable than the attitude of the police in letting people who have been convicted of child abuse have their names removed from the Sex Offenders' Register and continue to pursue children.  It is a strange world we live in when Peter Tatchell can be considered as the voice of reason and moderation!

The UK is an occupied nation, ruled over by people who have no right to hold any positions of authority in our lands.  The systematic abuse of children in the 'care' system is well known, and continues.  Children are bombarded with pornography by the media, the school system, and every other area under the control of the Establishment; they are made to feel that they must be sexually active, and preferably to be so in a multicultural and multisexual manner.  

The UK is the only country in Europe in which the State can legally kidnap children, taking them from their families and putting them into the Care system.  The children kidnapped in the UK can be taken from parents without any reason to justify such an outrage.  Over 1,000 children are removed from their families every month in the UK, with a tiny number forcibly adopted and permanently cut off from their parents, whilst the majority are handed over to Social Services, which - as the North Wales care homes abuse scandal clearly shewed - is  rife with pædophiles.  Jimmy Savile may be the most infamous pædophile in the UK, but compared to the State procurement of children which is legally carried out through the secret Family Courts, his deeds pale into insignificance - not of course regarding the damage to the individuals involved, but in terms of the numbers of victims.

The UK is a sick land, ruled over by degenerates who are evil, pure and simple.  There can be no reforming our enemies; no rehabilitation of those who destroy our young.  They must be rooted out and destroyed - to the last man and woman who has been involved in the abuse of children (whether directly or through the media, education etc), or has protected them through the legal system.  Wearing a police uniform or a judge's ridiculous wig is no defence and will in no way keep these despicable beasts free from natural justice when it catches up with them - which it will.