Activism MUST go beyond online efforts

To peruse the internet, one cannot fail to appreciate that the efforts of activists in bringing forbidden truths to a wider audience, are having a positive effect upon those who are seeking solutions to the problems created by the international menace.  The multi-faceted attacks upon all we hold dear are routinely exposed by an ever-increasing number of internet activists.  Issues such as the dangers of Wi-Fi, mobile 'phone radiation, aspartame, vaccinations and all manner of health-related concerns, are ably confronted online.   In these fields at least, we are winning the battle for the control of information.

Issues which many people shy away from for fear of being labelled in a manner which can impact upon the ability to find (and keep) work - such as the Holyhoax, Immigration as a tool for destroying national cohesion, War as an economic weapon, the role of the Elders of Organised Jewry et al - are also being successfully brought to the attention of the public in ways which the international enemy fear and detest.

The fight for the Truth is being won to varying degrees in an astounding range of areas.  However, the efforts expended in reaching people who are willing to listen to forbidden ideas, may well come to naught if they are limited to online activism, which may open the eyes of a small number of people, but generally only reaches those who are already awake.  In terms of awakening people who are in no way aware that they are sleep-walking into a global kosher concentration camp, relying solely on internet activism is simply not enough.  For all the work undertaken - which is laudable as far as it does reach people who are open-minded - unless it goes in tandem with real world efforts, we find ourselves in the desperate situation where we are in danger of winning in cyberspace, but losing in reality.

Internet activity only reaches those who are already at least partially aware of the manipulation of information by the hidden Establishment.  This is where the likes of Alex Jones and David Icke come into play.   Alex Jones plays on people's fears and herds the sheeple down the dead end of fighting enemies which don't really exist.  His focus upon scary 'nazis' is propaganda of the worst variety; a form of propaganda which not only diverts attention from the real enemy, but worse still creates a mental barrier towards exploring ideas which contain within them the only viable solutions to our common plight.  'Nazism' and National Socialism are polar opposites; the former being a caricature to discredit the latter, which in truth is simply a return to the natural order and as such is the only way to halt globalisation and all the evils which come with it.

David Icke plays the disinfo game from a slightly different angle to Jones, pushing the ludicrous idea that Zionism is not Jewish (!) and in any case that it is only the Rothschilds who are a danger.  The Rothschilds hold important roles inside the Zionist network, but far from acting as a corruption of Judaism, they are its fulfilment.  Icke also pushes nonsense alongside fact, thus distracting those who follow him with fantasies which divert attention away from important issues.  Icke and Jones, like Jordan Maxwell before them are shills who are paid in shekels to keep us fighting phantoms.

Fighting online is thus a struggle to expose the enemy which is visible, that which is hidden, and also the controlled opposition which wears the clothes of the resistance but is wholly in the pocket of the globalisers.  To this end, our struggle is important, and seeing shill after shill fall from the pedestals they put themselves on, is proof that the common enemy is not as persuasive as it would like to be. Of course, when we have the infamous statement of Alex Jones that the enemy of humanity is the 'Germanic Death Cult' - which he 'proves' by pointing to the fact that Freemasonry was captured and corrupted in Bavaria by the Weishaupt's Illuminati (yet omits to mention Weishaupt was Jewish and that the location of the capture could have been anywhere!) - then our struggle is made much easier by only needing to point to the stupidity of Jones' (and his kind's) argument.

We ARE winning online, which is why the enemy is coming down hard on internet activists.  Sites are being closed (or blocked as 'offensive'), laws are being written to silence us, transnational arrest warrants are being used to halt the disseminators of forbidden reality.  The reason that we are facing persecution for exercising free speech, is that enough of us are taking the fight into the real world to make a difference.  Or are we?

How many people use fora to argue about the very minutest details of the struggle, but then turn off their computers and smugly feel they have done their bit?  How many people limit the struggle to writing and commenting on sites that they are ideologically drawn to?  How many people preach to the converted and thus nullify their contribution to the struggle, by awakening no-one at all?  Too many; far, far too many.

To varying degrees we are all to blame for the failure to take the resistance into the real world.  We need to reach people who do not use the internet to gain information; nay, we need to reach people who may not use the internet at all.  Imaginative action is required if we are to reach beyond the confines of our computers.  Demonstrations outside supermarkets; pirate radio broadcasts; well-placed graffiti; talking to strangers on buses - any means of communicating with strangers is useful.  Sabotaging building sites involved in the destruction of our culture or of nature; disrupting traffic routes used for anti-social/anti-national purposes; driving scum families and individuals out of our areas (and ALL areas are our areas); all ACTIONS which send the message that we will not tolerate those who fight for the enemy are vital.  We have to move beyond propaganda, we have to literally fight.

Everyone can do something.  Everyone must do what he or she can.  If we fail to take the battle into the real world, we may find ourselves the victors of an online fight, who ultimately will have gained a pyrrhic victory as we achieve intellectual victory in the virtual realm but lose in the physical.  In any case, if we fail to win in the streets, our victories online will only be tolerated until such time as our enemies have enough information to arrest us all.  How smug will we be when we have lost everything, and have been incarcerated on top of that?  

We need to face the grim fact that we are the resistance, that no-one is going to save us except ourselves, and that unless we get out and fight in the real world, we will lose the struggle and condemn those who come after us to lives which are not worth living.  It is up to us to win this war.  We must strengthen our numbers in order to defeat the organised enemy - and that we must do largely away from our computer screens.