Nelson Mandela - Rot In Perpetuity

When is a racist murdering terrorist not a racist murdering terrorist?  When that killer of children, motivated by hatred of them solely for the colour of their skin, is a non-European, and his victims are White.  Nelson Mandela was a foul murderer.  He preached racist hatred against Europeans, and bombed an entire nation into submission to his Marxist tyranny.  To be fair to those who would proclaim Mandela to not be racist, it is true that he murdered Africans as well as Europeans, although the former were murdered for political or financial reasons, whilst the latter were murdered due to their ethnic origins.  If Mandela had been White and his victims non-White, he would have been compared with Hitler (using the usual hysterical mendacious propaganda), but as it was the other way around, he has been all but canonised by the global Talmudic media.

The following are the charming words of an ANC song which Nelson Mandela took pride in singing:

Ayasaba amagwala
Awudubule (i)bhunu
Ziyarobha le zintsha
Awudubule (i)bhunu

They are scared the cowards
Do shoot the/a farmer (Boer)
They rob us, these dogs 
Do shoot the/a farmer (Boer)  

People in the west have been imprisoned for singing songs which can be interpreted as 'racist', let alone which incite murder, especially racially-motivated murder.  Yet the western media is happy to play such songs as above, so long as they are not translated into languages which the majority of people can understand.  Of course, in the tradition of 'sticks and stones', it really doesn't matter what people sing, or what people write.  Only the 'politically correct' imbeciles believe that words can hurt people.  What Nelson Mandela did is what mattered; he murdered people.

When finally arrested, the terrorist scum Mandela was found in possession of:

•  210,000 hand grenades
• 48,000 anti-personnel mines
• 1,500 time devices
• 144 tons of ammonium nitrate
• 21,6 tons of aluminium powder
• 1 ton of black powder

Clearly, the ANC was well-funded by the likes of the Rothschilds in order to break South Africa so that it could be merged by force into the 'New World Order'.  Funny how the shill David Icke is silent about this fact.  For graphic imagery of the crimes of the ANC, (crimes which Icke and the BBC want you to never be made aware of) visit: http://www.censorbugbear.org/black-racism/terrorism/nelson-mandela-the-bombing-record

I apologise for repeating articles I have previously written, but the facts have not changed...

Born on the 18th July 1918, the Communist who organised the racist terrorist murders of innocent civilians across South Africa was honoured (sic) in 2008 by ‘celebrities’ with a concert in Hyde Park. Thousands of brainwashed Britons paid through the nose to worship this monster and shriek approval of his evil deeds against their own racial kinsmen.

On Sunday 29th June 2008 this creature met someone whose actions are tantamount to treason, (she has broken her Coronation oath and gives the Royal Assent to treasonous law after treasonous law), Queen Elizabeth II – possibly the only head of state in the modern era to do more to help bring ruin upon her own people – she must know the real truth about Nelson Mandela? Remember how she once danced with Mau Mau chief Jomo Kenyatta? Remember how she knighted the clearly insane Robert Mugabe?

Is this a little unfair to the rotting corpse who has a statue to himself in Trafalgar Square? Well look at just some of the facts:-

Mandela orchestrated the “Church Street Massacre,” a charming example of tolerance and decency from this ‘statesman,’ which resulted in the deaths of many Afrikaner women, children and babies. This bombing at rush hour was deliberately designed to cause the maximum number of innocent civilians to be murdered and maimed. It was one bombing amongst many – too many to contemplate.

Mandela’s ANC had prison camps in which torture was freely used, including raping men and women kidnapped by the terrorist criminals. Mandela has never apologised for the atrocities perpetrated by his savage army.

When Mandela was quite rightly imprisoned in Robben Island for his murderous terrorism, his prison number was 46664. On a computer keyboard the number 4 also is used for the $ sign. Thus Mandela has the identity number $666$ - the materialistic sign of Satan. How appropriate for this evil beast.

Across the border in the once decent nation of Rhodesia, Robert Mugabe rules with a reign of terror. The atrocities he commits are well known in Britain and throughout the world as the media never cease to expose the evil of his regime. The truth is that Nelson Mandela and Robert Mugabe are of the same mould. The reason that Mandela is praised whilst Mugabe is attacked is that Mandela’s victims are White, whereas Mugabe’s are Black. The reason for this is that ‘Zimbabwe’ has been virtually ethnically cleansed of the original British and European population whereas in South Africa the process is still ongoing. No doubt when the ANC turn on the Black population we may hear some murmurings of disapproval from our liberal press!

Decent people will never forget our brothers and sisters who were tortured, maimed, raped and murdered at the behest of this diabolical creature. Not to be outdone by her husband, the delightful Winnie was famous for her necklaces! ("With our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country")  These necklaces were rubber tyres, placed upon the shoulders of the victim which were then set alight, causing the victim to die an excruciatingly painful death.  'Saint' Nelson knew of this torture/murder technique and did nothing to halt its use.

In 1994 Nelson Mandela fulfilled his handlers' task by becoming President of South Africa.  In what has become an all too familiar pattern, Nelson Mandela's African National Congress, murdered and bombed its way into government.  In precisely the same manner as their counterparts in the SNC in Syria, or the NTC in Libya, the ANC terrorists were lauded by the mind-controlling media as 'freedom fighters' who were only seeking justice for their people.  Just as with the NTC and the SNC, their methods were murder and destruction.

The brutal atrocities committed by the ANC included the practice of 'necklacing' political opponents. This practice involved placing a petrol-soaked rubber tyre around the neck of the victim, then setting it alight.  The manner of death was especially painful and un-necessarily cruel.

In 2008, Mandela was fêted to lavish public displays of adoration in London; including a music festival and an audience with the Establishment mafia boss, Elizabeth Windsor.  No mention was made of the innocent civilians he murdered in the rush-hour Church Street Massacre, or that the only reason anyone should bemoan his 27-year prison sentence is that a more suitable punishment for his crimes would have been his execution.

The ANC was very much a forerunner of the NTC; spoken of in the media as the saviour of a persecuted people, in order to enact regime change for the benefit of the people, but in reality solely for the benefit of the International financial elite.

In pre-ANC South Africa, the system of Apartheid was far from perfect, but the poverty endured by the Black population was far below that they endure now.  All that the Regime Changers achieved for the people of South Africa was to bring misery and fear to the White population and to increase the tyrannical grip of the Internationalists.  Modern South Africa is a usurers paradise in which the old system of separate development has been replaced with a system of common exploitation.  The ex-wife of Nelson Mandela, Winnie, accurately described Nelson Mandela's period as President as a period of betrayal, in which the Black supporters of the ANC were forgotten, and life became harsher than under the regime they fought to end.

The only difference between the ANC, the NTC and the SNC is that the latter are officially Islamic and belong to the CIA's Al Qaeda operation, whereas the ANC was a communist CIA asset, and not officially religiously based.  The plan for the total obliteration of nation-states and the imposition of a 'New World Order' has been in full flow for many years.  The current fake religious phase was rolled out for public consumption at the time of the 9/11 Massacre.  The destruction of non-Muslim parts of the World had to be completed before the 9/11 crime could be committed.  Nelson Mandela's assigned task was to destabilise South Africa in order to cripple a 'rogue state' which was not complying with the multi-cultist agenda of reducing all people to being no more than producing-consuming identity-free robots.

The ANC Regime Change was but a link in a chain of orchestrated actions by the Hidden Elite.  In common with the ongoing atrocities in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia et al, the reality of Regime Change is transfer of wealth and authority from the individual nations into the hands of the International Cabal, and their multi-national corporations.  The suffering of humanity is real; only the lies of the media mask the human cost.  Those who celebrate Nelson Mandela's life have been duped into supporting an agent of globalisation, and a figure who has betrayed those who followed him.  Ultimately, Mandela remains a figure who has much blood on his hands, and who has only served the interests of Big Business and the builders of the Global State.  He does not deserve anyone's adoration, only our contempt.  

With Mandela's death, the world is a little cleaner.  A Marxist terrorist is gone.  However, the liberals and internationalists such as David Icke and the BBC would have us believe that Mandela was a 'great' man, and that we should be sad that he no longer pollutes the earth with his presence.  All those who died, were maimed, raped and tortured at the hands of his ANC scum, are dishonoured by the praise for the man who oversaw the destruction of their lives.

To return to numerology, Mandela departed this world last night, on the evening a film glorifying his evil was premièred in London.  Today is the 6th (6) of December (double 6), in the year 2013 (13).  For those interested in numerology, a man of pure evil has began his first full day in the non-physical realm on a date numbering 666 - 13.  It could be coincidence of course, but when one looks at coincidences, they tend to be very few and far between.

Nelson Mandela - Rot In Perpetuity.  Good riddance to an enemy of humanity and servant of international materialism.  Shame on those who lie that you were a good man.  you were, and remain a stain on the world, which has thankfully now gone, but by rights should have been wiped away many years ago.  It is a shame that Mandela was ever incarcerated.  It would have been far better to have executed every member of the Jewish-Communist ANC, rather than have been liberal and tolerant and allowed them to have become media idols in prison.  The dead do not make come backs and take over countries!

Israel: An unlikely inspiration for those who love Freedom

As I sit down to write these words, I cannot but feel that they are words which will cause offence to just about everybody reading them.  For those who see in the Jewish nation, the literal sons and daughters of Satan, any praise of these people is automatically seized upon as proof that the speaker/writer has 'sold out' to the enemy and become a Zionist agent.  For those who believe the 'Chosen people' drivel, any condemnation of the actions of Organised Jewry is likewise automatically regarded as heresy; as doing the work of the devil. When one finds oneself in a position that one will without doubt gain hostility from every side for speaking the truth on a subject matter which is all but forbidden, what should one do?  I firmly believe that the Truth is the Truth, and if speaking it causes problems, then so be it.  There are far too many people who only discuss that which is allowed by the guardians of 'political correctness', and their cowardice has led us to our present sorry plight.  I will not join them. 

Israel is a country which was built on occupied land, by supremacists who have absolutely no biological links to the land they now control.  These supremacists suffer from the delusion that a supernatural being (one with all the characteristics of a dæmonic entity) chose them to be a special race of people, for the purposes of doing his bidding.  It is possible to argue the point until one reaches exhaustion about the true origins of the people who call themselves the Jews, but that is to miss the most important aspect of the whole 'Jewish Question', which is that they themselves believe they are entitled to live in the land they call Israel (and to do so excluding all others), and that not only do they hold these views, they act upon them.

The belief that there must be a Jewish homeland is a belief which is known as Zionism.  In itself, separated from any supremacist and imperialistic ideas, there is nothing wrong with Zionism.  The problem with the State of Israel is not that a Jewish State exists, but that it exists in territory belonging to other people.  Internationalists like David Icke attack Israel because they see it as an 'apartheid' state, and they are such fervent believers in the lunacy that all people are the same except for outward physiological differences, that they cannot abide the idea of any people living exclusively amongst their own kind.  Ironically the likes of Icke present themselves as enemies of globalisation, but by opposing mono-culturalism, they are assets to those pushing the agenda which is popularly known as the New World Order.

Israel should be located inside the borders of Birobidjan, which was gifted to the Jewish people by the leaders of the Soviet Union in the 1920s.  There are in fact two Jewish States, and the one in Palestine has no legitimacy.  However, if we leave aside the issue of the illegal occupation of Palestinian land, and instead focus upon the State of Israel as a fact, we can find that Israel is not only distinct from the international order into which every nation is being pushed, it is proof that the entire global village concept is nonsense.

Israel operates an immigration policy which is based solely upon biology.  For anyone to gain citizenship, he or she must first prove a genetic linkage to the people classified as Jews.  The Law of Return stipulates that only a Jew born of a Jewess is Jewish, and that only Jews thus defined have the right to reside in the Jewish State.  This is a law which every nation should adapt to the indigenous population of the individual country concerned.  Those who scream 'racist' at those who advocate an end to non-European immigration into Europe, but then go on to support the right of Israel to exist, are hypocrites.  Likewise those who fight for their own people to live unmolested by others, but would see Israel cease to exist, are operating through flawed thinking.  Geographical location notwithstanding, Israel - just as every other ethnic nation - has the right to exist, and indeed it is in the interests of humanity that it continues to do so.

The 'Jewish Problem' afflicting the rest of the world is the result of the presence of diaspora Jews and crypo-Jews who agitate to destroy mono-ethnic territories by forcing upon them multi-culturalism.  Rather than oppose Israel, we need to take the same intellectual journey as Theodore Herzl and accept that there can never be assimilation of differing peoples, only absolute separation.  For Europeans, it is easy to argue for an end to non-white immigration, by simply pointing out that the cultural differences outsiders bring with them are harmful to our own culture.  Simplistically, it can be pointed out that outward physiological differences are the tip of the iceberg compared to the inward cultural and spiritual differences.  Sadly, when the issue of the Jews arises, because many of them look like we do outwardly, there is a confusion of thought which believes that they must be inwardly like us as well - only differing insofar as religious beliefs are concerned.  This error of thought is incredibly dangerous, displays a woeful lack of understanding of genetics, and exposes a tragic lack of appreciation of the importance of our own identities.

David Icke never misses an opportunity attack the sense of self-preservation amongst the Jews in Israel.  Alike to so-called 'nationalists' in the UK who pride themselves on their collaboration with anti-Zionist Rabbis (Mayer Schiller springs to mind), Icke aligns himself with those who would be referred to by other Jews as 'self-hating'.  Assimilationists and multicultists whether Jewish or otherwise are truly enemies of all who seek a free world built on mutual respect and the right to immerse fully in one's own culture free from the impact of competing cultures occupying the same territory.  Assimilation means surrendering one's own ways to those of the host population; multiculturalism takes this evil a step further by undermining the culture of the indigenous population and by so doing, weakening the cultures of all involved.  This paves the way for the reduction of distinct artistic, intellectual and spiritual beings to bland uniform producer-consumers fit only to take their place as slaves of the one-world plantation.  The only way to counter this peril is to defend all nations by opposing all aspects of internationalism: migratory; financial; commercial; whatever.  To this end, the Zionists who live in Israel (especially on the kibbutzim or in the settlements of the West Bank) must be held in far higher esteem than the rabble who live outside Israel - especially those who work for 'anti-racist' and other treacherous bodies.

In Israel, race-mixing is forbidden.  The Jews understand that multiculturalism means death, and so they use it as a weapon to destroy those they perceive to be enemies.  This paranoia is a part of the supremacist mindset and cannot be combated if even as much as a single Jew or Crypto-Jew lives in the diaspora.  Multiculturalism is strictly an export ideology, and is opposed in Israel itself.  Multiculturalism is self-sustaining.  For this cancerous ideology to be completely destroyed, it is vital that all peoples of every race and origin, be returned to their homelands.  There is a natural instinct in all except rabid racial self-haters for people to look after their own people first.  This can be a great asset in mono-ethnic societies, but is is harmful to societies which have been foolish enough to allow outsiders to become citizens.  in many instances this takes the form of racist groups who laughingly call themselves anti-racist, demanding rights solely due to their skin colour or belief system.  Israel is right to keep outsiders out.  Every nation which has a healthy desire to live, must do likewise.  

Currently, Israel is working towards an agreement with several African countries to trade migrants for armaments and aid.  As with every other country in the world, outsiders have wreaked havoc in Israel, committing all manner of crimes, including rape.  Contrary to the liberal traitors in the West (many of them Jewish), the Israeli authorities have taken steps to remove immigrants in order to defend the host population, and also have taken steps to secure the borders to keep others from entering the nation.  For putting the interests of Israelis first, the one-worlders have taken to labelling Israel as an Apartheid State (failing to mention that Apartheid simply is a system for allowing differing peoples to develop separately).  Certainly the behaviour of multicultist Jews outside Israel does invite condemnation of the hypocrisy displayed when it comes to keeping Israel Jew-pure, but the condemnation should be aimed at the liberal filth outside Israel's borders, not the Jews who dwell within the Jewish State and dedicate their lives to developing and exploring their own culture, rather than wrecking the cultures of others.

Israel engages in imperialism, and for that it must be opposed.  The best way to oppose this tendency is not to call for the dismantling of Israel and thus the dispersal of Jews across Europe and the European world, but for the enforcement of Zionism in every nation.  Assimilation and multiculturalism cannot be anything but destructive.  It is in the interests of all nations that all Jews be 'returned' to Israel.  The infamous statement of David Cameron that the UK's ruling Tory Party should be called the Torah Party due to the over-representation of Jews within its upper rank, highlights how vital it is to prevent the establishment of colonies of immigrants in any nation, and especially of the Jewish State-within-a-State which we have in the UK.  Israel would not tolerate a Christian Knesset sitting alongside (let alone dictating to) the official parliament, and nor should any nation tolerate outsiders forming their own political, legal and economic systems to act independently of the host nation.

As bitter as the words may taste in ones mouth, they have to be said: We need to reappraise our relationship with Zionism, and rather than opposing it in every aspect, we must embrace the central tenet of it - that being the return of all Jews to the Jewish homeland, and the permanent end of any Jewish involvement in the world outside the confines of that territorially-defined nation.  National Freedom and Social Justice go hand-in-hand.  Our own Freedom can only be guaranteed so long as everyone else's is also.  The Naturei Karta Jews so despised by the Jews in Israel are rightly despised.  Anyone who opposes the separation of the races, no mater how reasonable and 'nice' their arguments, is an agent of the enemy.  Israel will never be a friend to Europe - or to any other  people for that matter - but it is an inspiration from which we can learn plenty.

Jews and Islam: A European Perspective.

Across Europe, the indigenous population is being legally discriminated against by the Establishment and all of its many tentacles - including the media, education system, social services, employment regulation bodies, and all manner of self-hating liberal volunteer groups.  We are forced to fund services which we are then denied access to (or at the very least, placed at the back of a very long queue to use); we are denied advancement in employment solely due to our ethnic background; we are denied freedom of speech on anything of importance whilst being repeatedly told that we live in 'democracies'.   All over Europe people are waking up to the lies of the Establishment.  This, however, is where the greatest evil of the Establishment is being brought into play. Awakening Europeans are being herded into opposing either the Ruling Jewish Class, or the Muslim Colonisers - and of course supporting the opposite faction.  This is a grave mistake by all involved.

I live in an overwhelmingly Muslim area, thus I write from experience about Muslims.  The adage that there is good and bad in everyone certainly applies to Muslims as much as anyone else.  On occasion, Muslims who are complete strangers have been very helpful - such as when my car has run out of petrol, or when I have been moving heavy or large furniture.  The willingness to help someone without any desire for payment in return has been a refreshing change from the expected money-driven attitude of many indigenous people.  This kindness, whilst remarkable, seldom occurs.  There are sadly not only just as many, but in fact more Muslims who are happy to engage in acts of cruelty against strangers, as there are ones who will behave charitably.  Indeed, where I live, it is quite common for people from outside the district to be attacked if they visit, due to standing out as not knowing the area.  Racial abuse is becoming ever more common amongst teenagers and young adults, who have recently even taken to throwing bottles at infants and calling very young children 'white bastards'.  The good of the few is cancelled out by the evil of the others. 

So, are Muslims divided into good and bad types then?  Is the Prime Minister right that Islam is a Religion of Peace and that 'Islamists' do not represent Muslims)?  The vast majority of Pakistani Muslims in my area do not speak to the indigenous people at all.  Many of them do not know enough English to communicate, but mostly the reason they do not talk to people outside their national-ethnic-religious-cultural group, is that they do not consider us fit to speak to.  There is an underlying arrogance in the Pakistani community, which is expressed through the refusal to speak to outsiders.  In shops, rather than touch the hand of an indigenous person whilst giving change for a bought product, coins will be dropped from a height, often falling to the ground.  We are considered 'dirty' and merely touching us is distasteful. 

The refusal of Muslims to touch indigenous people does not apply to young girls,  who are seen as dirty whores to abuse as is seen fit.  It is very common for any female of any age (although more often than not of a very young age) to be followed home by Pakistanis who say such delightful things as 'if you don't suck my cock, you are racist!' The education system has so damaged girls in particular that should a non-indigenous man use the race card as a means to getting a girl to have sex with him, he has a strong chance of success.  In the case of older females, the presence of children makes no difference, nor does a woman telling such a man she is married - as he will simply reply along the lines of  'so what? So am I'.  The multicultist propaganda of the television is used to make women feel they must submit to the advances of the colonisers lest they be seen as - horror of horrors - racist.

The likes of the EDL will endlessly quote selected passages of the Qur'an to link the obsession of many Pakistani men with girls who are little more than children, to the Islamic faith.  They of course fail to note that the majority of judges who refuse to punish pædophiles are not Muslims, but are a part of a system which is overwhelmingly Judaic.  They fail to consider that the education system is controlled by cultural and political Marxists, who tend to be of the Judaic tribe.  The EDL will scour the television networks to find Muslims preaching hatred, but they do not take into account that almost without exception, the television networks in Europe and the European world are owned, staffed and otherwise controlled by people whose ancestors (if not themselves) adhered to the Talmud rather than the Qur'an.

I know Pakistani women who will not get into a taxi driven by fellow Pakistanis for fear of being sexually abused or harangued by religious bigots.  These women do not dress immodestly, but nor do they wear the cultural uniform dictated by their home culture.  For this they can expect abuse; this is not for a transgression of religion, but of culture.  It is noteworthy that for all the talk of modesty in Islam, Pakistani women who adhere to the dress of their homeland tend to be absolutely covered in make-up, wear saris which leave very little to the imagination, and look like they are on their way to work as prostitutes.  Perhaps this is a Pakistani phenomenon, rather than an Islamic one.  Indigenous women who dress very immodestly, do so due to the constant bombardment of the fashion and pop-music industries which teach them that they must dress (and act) as whores or else commit the horrendous crime of being old-fashioned.  The fashion and pop industries, like most of the evil imposters which have displaced our culture, are not Islamic, they are Judaic. 

Racism is a reality within the Pakistani community.  Pakistanis who are born in the UK refer to Pakistan as 'home', for that is precisely what it is.  They visit their homeland as often as is practicable, and send money to relatives who still live there; very often money which has been gained from claiming welfare benefits on top of untaxed hidden earnings of various degrees of legality.  When it comes time to marry, Pakistanis born in the UK go to Pakistan to marry a man or woman 'untainted' by European culture.  Thus the number of colonisers rapidly increases, and any possibility of them becoming Europeanised is halted.  

The reason that so many Pakistanis do not speak English is that they do not need to, and due to their hostility towards our nation, they do not want to.  Their communities are so large that they effectively form detached parts of Pakistan which may physically occupy European soil, but are culturally, economically, ethnically and religiously separate.  When they have dealings with the UK authorities (such as when they claim unemployment benefits or have access to medical attention paid for by indigenous taxpayers) they have translators laid on for free.  This lunacy is perceived to be to the advantage of the immigrants who effectively bring their homelands with them and in so doing displace the indigenous population so as to not be 'contaminated' by us.  Certainly the colonisers take advantage of this despicable system, but it is a policy brought into being by the Talmudists who infest national government, not by the immigrants themselves.  The distasteful opportunism of the colonisers gains them hostility from the indigenous population; thus providing a distraction to keep the attention of the people away from the Talmudic architects of our demise.

Islam is a problem in Europe.  It is a problem because our enemies have usurped our culture, putting in its place a foul caricature of everything which is wholesome to us.  This caricature has become so embedded through the enemy media, education system, legal system etc, that many have come to regard any expressions of belief which go against the caricature, as an assault upon our indigenous way of life!  The Muslim belief that no-one can have an opinion unless it is one which the blood-thirsty thief and rapist Mohammed had, is well known.  Islam is harmful to Europe on many levels, but that does not mean that everything Muslims believe is wrong.  One of the worst aspects of the entire Zionist operation known as the EDL is that whenever Muslims stand in opposition to the Judaic cult of Cultural Marxism, the anti-Islamic backlash becomes a staunch defence of that very evil which is destroying us.  Of this kind of reactionary thought we must be very wary.

Many of our women dress in very inappropriate ways, displaying far too much flesh and shewing far too little respect for themselves.  This is not the European way.  Our culture has always regarded motherhood as sacred, and has seen the protection of femininity as of paramount importance.  What we see in Islam with regards to the modesty of dress and moral behaviour of women, is almost identical with how we ourselves have always naturally viewed women.  When men go to war, they go to fight to ensure that the women of the nation are kept safe; they go to protect the home.  The likes of the EDL - with their propaganda featuring scantily clad women - espouse the 'virtue' of promiscuity which Islam is against.  they claim it is a right of all women to act as unpaid whores.  Presumably if Pakistani women would soil themselves by having sex with EDL retards, then the ne'er do wells would no longer have a problem with Islam.  Promiscuity is not our way; it is a weapon to destroy us; a Judaic weapon. The dogma of 'feminism' is anti-feminine.  Many women who convert to Islam instinctively reject the Judaic fraud which has taken the place of our culture; sadly they are running to another dead-end, rather than embracing our old way and breathing new life into our besieged traditions.  The position of womanhood has always been sacred in Europe, and it is that to which we must return, not to any Asiatic faith whether Jewish, Muslim, or whatever.

The Al-Qaeda phenomenon is another front for our enemies to bring us to their defence.  The Wahhabi sect is a Jewish creation.  As the late Syrian President, Hafez Assad stated,

"There is nothing more dangerous to Islam than distorting its meanings and contents from within, by a group who is wearing the robe of Islam (using the religion as an umbrella and cover), and that is exactly what the criminal Brotherhood is doing. They kill, murder, and assassinate in the name of Islam. They massacre and slaughter children, women, and the elderly in the name of Islam. They kill entire families in the name of Islam."

 

This Muslim Brotherhood of Wahhabi/Salafi Muslims is a Jewish front, which, like Protestantism in Christianity, has been used to divide Muslims in order to control them by manipulating them into fighting one another.  All the terrorist atrocities committed by the Wahhabi scum (Libya, Syria et al) are the actions of psychopaths who have taken the Jewish-created lie to heart.  For exposing the Jewish creators of the evil cult, Saddam Hussein's Iraq was destroyed.  Turkey and Saudi Arabia are such strong allies of the criminal state of Israel because their rulers are crypto-Jews.

There is a tendency amongst European nationalists to favour Islam over Judaism due to the occupation of Palestine by criminal Talmudists.  This is an understandable expression of solidarity with a people who have lost their lands to colonisers.  There is another tendency which allies itself with Israel as a reaction to the Islamic colonisation of our own countries.  Whereas sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians is laudable, those who identify with Israel are media brain-washed imbeciles who can only see the symptoms of our plight, and not the cause. 

The Muslim problem in Europe is a result of the Jewish problem.  The International Zionists (as opposed to National Zionists) seek to destroy every nation by imposing multiculturalism and creating strife between the incompatible peoples wherever they have been forced to share territory.  Of course in Occupied Palestine, the criminal Israeli regime has the sense to ensure that multiculturalism does not exist.  In a sane world, every nation would operate in the way of the Israeli model; albeit without the subjugation of others.

There are good Muslims as well as opportunistic and criminal ones.  Likewise there are good Jews who have no desire to control the lives of other people.  Siding with one faction against the other within our borders is to miss the basic point of nationhood; that point being that our lands belong to us, and no-one, regardless of how well they fit in, has a right to be in our territory.  The Jews have brought with them Finance capitalism, Usury, Cultural Marxism, Feminism, Promiscuity, Sexual Depravity.  The Muslims have likewise brought with them a way of life which demands we alter to become like them.  

We need to stop thinking in terms of whether Jews are more or less harmful than Muslims, and take a third position on the issue; we need to accept that there can be no Jews or Muslims in Europe if Europe is to survive.  Europe is our land, and it always has been.  Our ancestors would not have pandered to any outsiders who insulted our traditions and made us bow down to their economic systems, sexual perversions or superstitious drivel, and nor should we.  We need a restructured world built on absolute National Freedom.  To that end, it is only right that all lands be returned to the people to whom they belong.  

If the Jewish elite so despise us that they feel they have to destroy us through multiracial genocide, then there is no reason to permit them to remain amongst us.  If the Muslims are so convinced that their way is the only way, that they have to eradicate every facet of our culture, even to the point of imposing their dietary system upon us, then they too must leave and return to lands in which their preferred system already exists.  

In return for removing all who threaten our genetic stream, culture and traditions, we must ensure that we prevent the collaborators in Big Business and Freemasonry supporting a return to the international financial system which rapes nations economically and bombs into submission all who resist it.  We need to face the reality that the Rothschilds, the IMF, and all other aspects of Judaic banking are the cause of all wars, and thus of the majority of mass migration.  The Muslim problem is a result of the Jewish problem and the solution to both is the peaceful removal of all non-Europeans, and all Europeans who have accepted these ideologies as their own.  

Neither Talmud, nor Qur'an, but authentic Europe; the Europe of a hundred flags - all of them indigenous..

Alex Jones debunked on video

The Police State in action: Men arrested for walking in England.

The UK is a basket case.  Our sad and troubled land is ruled by Talmudic tyrants who impose their will with their well-paid thugs in uniform, the police.  Those who disagree with the ruling political orthodoxy can expect to be taken against their will by armed criminals, to be held in a place from which they cannot leave, and then after enduring this ordeal, be forced into a corrupt legal system which will be used to either rubber-stamp their kidnapping, or force them to pay money to a system which has long passed beyond having any credibility.

In London, two men were arrested for the 'crime' of walking upon an English street!  I am no fan of the EDL, but the treatment of Kevin Carroll and Stephen 'Tommy' Lennon at the hands of the so-called British police is nothing but disgusting.  In the following video, the EDL men can be seen being assaulted by a UAF terrorist, whilst the police do nothing.  Upon complaining that the police have ignored an assault which occurred directly before their eyes, the EDL men are then arrested for arguing for the UAF bootboy to be arrested for committing a crime!  Clearly in the hell-hole which is the modern UK, members of the UAF are able to assault all who oppose the multi-culti obliteration of our country, and objecting to this is a crime.

 

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/mEI0TKkX9_o

Why is the UAF so free to assault political opponents?  The UAF was established by the UK government.  A list of the politician and trades unionists who signed this obscenity into existence can be found at the following link: http://uaf.org.uk/about/founding-signatories/. The list includes the Prime Minister of the UK, David ben-Cameron - a man who has boasted that the leading 'Tory' party should be called the Torah party because it is so packed with Jews; something which Cameron bizarrely considers to be a good thing.  The UAF receives funding from all the Establishment parties, and from Trades Union members, regardless of their wishes.  Many UAF thugs are thugs of the police, only out of uniform.  The enemies of free speech are paid by the State to do its bidding.

A video of UAF scum supporting Muslims who call for non-Muslims to be murdered can be found at the following link: http://youtu.be/zCQNLDhrskA. This is what UK taxpayers are ordinary trades Union members are extorted into funding.

For those who do not recognise the loud-mouthed enemy of free speech with the microphone, he is none less than Michael Adebolajo, the 'star' of the Woolwich incident who appeared to behead a British soldier on the streets of London.  As a result of this incident, the enemy police have cracked down on all who criticise mass immigration; not on those immigrants who call for our extermination!

It is no surprise that the two EDL members were publicly assaulted in broad daylight right in front of the police, but they themselves were arrested.  In France a comparable injustice has occurred with regards to the arrest of Esteban Morillo for defending himself against the brutal assault of the foul anti-fascist rat, Clément Méric.  Méric attacked Morillo for no other reason than he opposed his right to have an opinion.  Morillo was struck several times before responding with a single punch in self defence.  Unluckily for Méric (but not for France), Morillo's blow was sufficient to kill the Marxist rodent.  As a result of the anti-Fascist criminal assault, Morillo is being prosecuted for manslaughter, and the organisations to which he has been linked have been banned.  Of course the terrorist network to which Clément Méric belonged has received no condemnation, only words of support (and finance) from the anti-French government.

Across Europe, the enemies of freedom are assaulting those who defend free speech.  They are allowed to do so because this serves the agenda of the Establishment.  In many cases the anti-free speech activists are serving police officers, hence the failure to detain their comrades.

None of this State/anti-Fascist collaboration is new.  Before the UAF came along, it was the ANaL and AFA vermin which assaulted patriots and anyone who dared to question multi-racialism.  Gatherings of dissidents then, just as now, were routinely attacked by such scum, and when the undercover filth had finished their assaults, their uniform colleagues would swoop in to arrest anyone who spoke out against their attackers.  Democracy is dead in the UK - if it was ever even born.

The detention of the EDL men and the victim of antifa criminals in France is  a serious problem for all of us.  Our enemies must be exposed, and their collaboration highlighted.  Make no mistake, our lands are being destroyed by design, and those who oppose the resistance, are a key part of the problem.  

In the UK it is not a crime to act in self defence if one feels threatened.  If a UAF terrorist attacks you, you are legally entitled to fight him off, even to kill him if that is necessary.  You will of course be arrested for defending yourself, but if you remeber the following, you are legally protected:

1. You must feel threatened
2. You must be attempting to make your escape (you cannot be seen to be on the attack)
3. You must only use force which is necessary to repel your assailant
4. Your actions must be in the moment - you cannot retaliate at a later time.
5. If you feel scared you may use anything which is to hand, so long as you can justify it being in your possession.  Thus if you just happen to have for example a tin of food in a string shopping bag, which you rap around your attackers head in self-defence, that is fine (you must have been shopping and be on the way to somewhere to eat what is in the tin, or maybe feed you pets.  Out of date tins will get you in trouble!)  Also if you just happen to pick up a weapon which by pure coincidence was lying nearby and you found by chance, then you cannot be prosecuted for a crime such as 'going prepared'.

Research your rights and be prepared to defend yourself.  If your assailant is an undercover police thug, then his choice of treachery is his fault, and you shouldn't think twice about defending yourself against such a creature.  These are dark days.  In France, Morillo could have been killed if he had not fought back.  In the UK, the EDL men were slated for arrest no matter what they did or said.  Educate yourself about your legal rights, and don't be intimidated by the enemy.  Things are bad now, and they will get much much worse if we simply roll over and do nothing.

Alex Jones - Controlled Opposition; David Icke - Committed Internationalist

It is now a week since the Bilderberg circus rolled into England.  Unlike previous Establishment gatherings this year the Bilderberg Conference was acknowledged by the mainstream media, who even took the time to highlight the event, and to draw attention to those who were protesting against it.

Last Sunday, the BBC aired the now infamous interview with Alex Jones in which the Texan stooge ranted like a lunatic.  Alex Jones is forever lamenting that the media is controlled by a cabal which seeks to enslave us, yet time and again, this self-proclaimed messiah of the 'truth movement' is invited to shout about how evil the media is.  The very fact that Jones was invited onto the BBC, speaks volumes in itself.

For those who have not yet seen Alex Jones' shameful display, the video can be found at the following link: http://youtu.be/xgBq6q4x8Fw

Alex Jones has long been exposed as an insider working to deflect people from the truth that Organised Jewry is a menace to humanity (Jews included).  The BBC programme could not have done much more to discredit the 'truth movement'.  The anti-Bilderberg protest was a genuine protest by ordinary people who are sick of being told that we live in 'free countries' by people who speak of democracy and open government, yet meet behind closed doors with the heads of finance and multi-national corporations to take direction over policies to implement through government.  The presence of people dressed as clowns was a gift to those who seek to portray opposition to the Establishment as the work of cracks in need of psychiatric help.

Alex Jones was given the opportunity to calmly discuss matters of importance to all of us.  Any serious activist would have grabbed this opportunity to highlight government policies which are contrary to the public interest.  Not Alex Jones though!  The well-paid shill used his time on the Sunday Politics programme to rant like a madman in a manner which could not fail to create the impression that all who oppose the State are tinfoil hat wearing idiots or religious freaks.  He made the lot of the opposition to the global enemy that bit harder by his antics.

Fellow guest, and fellow Zionist, Aaronovitch made the valid point that the Globalist mafia would quite happily murder anyone who got in their way, and asked Jones if his miraculous escape from any harm whatsoever at the hands of those he claims to expose was because:

• i.) The 'conspiracy' does not exist;
• ii.) Alex Jones is a part of the problem, working for them as a paid insider

Of course, the slant of the BBC piece was such as to give anyone without an understanding of the work of Alex Jones the impression that he is a lone idiot of no consequence, who should be laughed at for his delusions.  For anyone who has taken the time to research Alex Jones, he is a man who has gained a mass following of dissidents, and has carefully misled them down a blind alley fighting ghosts of yesteryear.  Without a shadow of a doubt, Alex Jones is a part of the problem; a very significant part due to his ability to mix truth with lies and to misdirect the people into fighting the wrong battles.

At a time when the IMF is destroying nations from within, and when the paid thugs of the corporate world, NATO, is bombing non-compliant nations into surrendering to the internationalists economic system, Alex Jones used his time on the BBC to declare that the monetary unit of the EU, the Euro, was created as a Nazi German plan!  The historical nationalist, national socialist, fascist and similar movements of Europe at no point in time tried to create a single currency for Europe.  The economic systems used in each country which threw off the yoke of the Jewish banks, varied from country to country as required by local conditions; but each was based on creating money as credit, not debt.  The logical outcome of the ideologies Jones riles against is the creation of ever more local currencies, not the creation of a global centralised currency which the Euro is a step towards.  Jones is wilfully wrong on this issue, and by labelling the unpopular Euro currency as 'nazi', forces attention away from the Talmudic bankers who do indeed control it.  This is not a mistake which any serious researcher independent of control by the Internationalist cabal would make.

The Euro is the old Rothschild system, spread across the continent, and is fully founded on usury and debt.  Alex Jones clearly either has no understanding of the principles of Social Credit which remain the backbone of every movement which opposes international finance usury, or he is a liar.  If he is the former, his research is useless and he is therefore not worthy to speak for those who are ill at ease with the globalising agenda; if he is the latter, he is an asset of the globalisers.  The former is possible, the latter is definite.

Alex Jones has repeatedly declared David Icke to be a madman, pointing to the fact that Icke mixes serious issues in with drivel about the moon being a spaceship, and inter-dimensional shape-shifting reptoids ruling the world.  David Icke has gained in popularity as Jones has fallen; perhaps this explains Jones' complete u-turn viz-a-viz Icke, who he now speaks alongside; perhaps Jones' avowed opposition to Icke has now ended due to the mutual handlers of each charlatan seeing Icke as a more successful vehicle for their controlled opposition propaganda.

Jones also used his visit to Watford to link up with the 'activist taxi driver' who uses youtube to rant about current affairs in the manner of a juvenile loudmouth who believes that foul language is funny and shouting somehow makes what one says more important.  Jones is himself an advocate of the shouting-down technique, and has been known to use profanity as a shock weapon; which shocks no-one other than impressionable teenagers and fools of all ages. Alongside the 'taxi driver' who is more likely to drive cars from the police pool than a taxi, Jones also met up with Max Keiser who likes to compare the Establishment with vampyrs!  Impressed?  I hope not!  For the level of debate these shills have reduced the opposition to, see the video at the following link: http://youtu.be/CWoMX5qGXXg

Although Jones, Keiser, and many others were at the anti-Bilderberg shindig, the star turn of this pantomime was David Icke.  David Icke was a mediocre footballer who went on to use his 'sports career' to gain work inside the Establishment media where he doubtless was groomed for his role as New Age guru and misleader of the resistance to universal serfdom.  Icke too is more than happy to attack the 'nazis', thus shifting attention away from the very real present day enemy onto an aspect of history; an aspect which had within it the seeds of change which could have prevented our current plight had it been allowed to.

Icke is an internationalist.  The drive towards a single global government, with a single military, police force, economy etc is Internationalism in practice.  Icke spoke at Watford about the need for the people to unite, and throw off any identification with race, nation, culture, faith etc.  This is exactly the agenda of the enemy.  The multicultural agenda, may proclaim itself as a programme for the mutual acceptance of differing cultures amongst all people, but this is a smokescreen for the deliberate mixing of ethnic streams which cannot but end in ethnic genocide, and the end of identifiable races outside the ruling caste.  

The only way to fight internationalism and the globalisers is to strengthen the bonds of blood and soil, of culture, of faith, not to weaken them!  Yes there are those who motivated by hatred of others and are useless in the fight for freedom, but Icke, by concentrating on fringe supremacists and arguing for a form of  'unity' which is against nature and tradition, does the work of the enemy.  Freedom for one means freedom for all, and the only way to build a world of respect for those who differ from us is to build one in which our own identities are protected and nurtured, and so are those of everyone else in their own lands.

In the speech Icke gave at Watford, not only did he promote a universalism which plays right into the hands of the Establishment, he also made the ludicrous claim that passive resistance will solve all our woes!  The people of Romania did not overcome the despotism of Nicolae Ceaușescu by dancing and meditating for freedom; they overcame the rule of the despots by executing them!  Anyone who thinks that our plight will be ended without any blood being spilled, is living in a dream-world.  At any rate, unless the likes of William Hague and Tony Blair are physically liquidated, what is to stop their kind re-emerging and retaking power?   Certainly traditional violent revolution is no longer an option due to the vast imbalance of power at the disposal of the enemy in comparison with that at our disposal, but there must be a degree of force to create change.  As the Russian proverb states, 'lyes rubyat, shchepki letyat' - 'to chop down a forest, splinters will fly' - and fly they must.

Direct link to video of Icke's One World hippy claptrap: http://youtu.be/2-YGE2KLa58

David Icke is now shifting his campaign to the creation of a global television network to unite the people and combat the 'false divisions' of race, culture, nation, religion etc.  This alternative news-media will also include music and other entertainment which will be used to overthrow the status quo.  Does Icke really believe that 'musik macht frei'?  Did he perhaps take too much ayahuasca in South America?  Or is he simply another shill out to create a diversion whilst the real enemy consolidates power unmolested?  He certainly is following the pattern of Alex 'money bomb' Jones and other false leaders who have gained financially by selling false hopes and fear.  But then why change a formula for controlling the opposition when it has worked so well in the past?

Like Alex Jones, David Icke is feeding the sheeple a mixture of fear-mongering, real information and lies.  His non-'comply-dance' is indicative of the direction is is herding those who follow him.  He is the provider of gossip, shocking material and other titillation to keep the people entertained.  How appropriate that he is branching out into the media!  We may be running out of bread, but with Jones, Icke and other puppets, we certainly have no shortage of circuses.  

Self reliance is the key to our salvation; self reliance and leaderless resistance.  Don't be fooled by those who think they have all the answers, and don't fall for the idea that we are going to get through this unscathed.  This struggle will take years, most likely generations, and it isn't going to be bloodless by any means.  Those who claim otherwise are liars and even though they may throw us the occasional crumb of truth, they must not be trusted; nor must they be allowed to go about their business unopposed simply because they have mass followings.  A plausible Pied Piper is more dangerous than an obvious enemy.

For more on Alex Jones, visit: http://alexjonesisazionistshill.blogspot.com

Alex Jones is paid by Zionists

By Nathanael Kapner



THE CONTROVERSY OF ALEX ‘BULLHORN’ JONES being an alleged Zionist shill has now expanded to his apparent Zionist-Jewish connections on his 1) Personal Staff 2) Website Advertisers 3) Link To Time Warner President, Edgar Bronfman Jr. Jones’ seeming allegiance to Zionism, which explains why he virtually never targets Zionist Jews or the racist, Zionist rogue state of Israel when engaging in his notorious rants and attacks, may well stem from a Protestant-Zionist belief system, and the widely circulated reports that his wife is a Jew - - which makes his two children Jewish under Talmudic law and eligible for the Israeli Law Of Return. In that Jones’ wife is of Jewish heritage, both she and the children would be automatic dual citizens…Alex would not qualify.
With additional information on Jones which this site is now providing, Alex Jones’ Zionist connections prompting his reticence to expose global Zionism, becomes ever more obvious.
And to add insult to injury, Jones recently interviewed a Zionist-Jew professor, a “Dr Jonathan Levy,” who railed in typical Jewish fashion against the Catholic Church as being part of the New World Order. Yet, not a word from Jones and his Jewish guest about Zionist Jewry being the real driving force behind the NWO.

Beginning With His Personal Staff, Jones’ Key Employees Are Jews: Rob Jacobson: Jones’ cameraman. Jacobson also does film and video editing work for Alex Jones.
Aaron Dykes: He does web-mastering and video work for Jones’ Websites, Infowars and Prisonplanet.
Jason Bermas: He hosts Jones’ radio show, The Alex Jones Show, when Jones is on vacation. Bermas recently attacked all critics of Jews, calling them, “Anti-Semites” and stating that they should all die.
Alex Jones Also Has An Abundance Of Jewish Advertisers Who ‘Pay His Way:’Henri-James Tieleman: President of EcoloBlue Life & Energy. Tieleman does live, on-air 10-minute commercials on Alex Jones’ radio show, and the regular recorded commercials are voiced by Alex Jones himself. Tieleman also has a large flash animation banner advertisement at the top right-hand corner of the main page of Alex Jones’ Prisonplanet Website.
Steve Shenk: Director of the Michael Stevens Group. Shenk advertises his subsidiary, eFoods Direct, on Alex Jones’ radio show. See Shenk On The Alex Jones Show Here.
Allen L Schultz: Owner of Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. Schultz often uses an animated banner advertisement at the top right-hand side of the main page of Alex Jones’ Prisonplanet Website. View Jones’ Entire Jewish Advertisers Here.

A JONES-BRONFMAN LINK?HOLLY BRONFMAN LEV IS Edgar Bronfman Jr’s sister. As founder of the Bet Lev Foundation and 100% owner of Lev Group Ltd, Holly Bronfman’s legal affairs are conducted by the high-powered lawyer, Elizabeth Schurig, who also happens to handle the legal affairs of Alex Jones.
Schurig’s legal office is located at 100 Congress Avenue, 22nd Floor, Austin Texas 78701. Of particular note, on January 3, 2008, Schurig changed Jones Productions LLC to the same address as her legal firm, 100 Congress Avenue.
The “Governing Authority” of Jones’ Infowars LLC and his Jones Report LLC are also at the address of Schurig’s law offices.
The Alex Jones Machine Website puts it all like this — “So now Alex’s corporate addresses is a Bronfman’s lawyer’s address?” View Entire Story Here.
At the very least, the Jones revenue-streams from his Jewish sponsors present far too many obstacles for him to discuss world Zionism to any realistic degree. Sponsor revenues aside, Jones’ Jewish connections are, indeed, profound, wide-ranging and number far too many for him to dare report the facts and dynamics of the Zionist control, influence and subjugation of much of the planet…even if he wanted to.
Methinks That Alex Jones Has WAY TOO MANY Jewish Connections
To Report The ‘Zionist’ Facts As They Really Are…
___________________________________
For More See: Is Alex Jones A Zionist Shill?..Controversy Swirls Click Here And: Confessions Of An Anti-Zionist Journalist Click Here

Alex Jones works for Israeli Stratfor operation

Alex Jones is a shill.  He has managed to hide his masters for some time, but now information is coming out linking him to the Israeli operation, Stratfor.  He employs people who have worked for the military espionage services, but has the gall to state that this means nothing!  The pattern of recruitment is obvious for all to see.

http://youtu.be/5WWjRIQdIMY

Alex Jones uses the Trotskyite method of character assassination! In the Soviet days, those who were not 'politically correct' were branded as schizophrenic and locked away in lunatic asylums. The shill Jones, is continuing the tried and tested methods of his masters.

http://youtu.be/zqxEZritY3Q

http://youtu.be/YRk4gZD2TJI

David Icke - Closet Internationalist

David Icke is a controversial figure, who courts criticism, but at the same time produces much valuable work exposing the internationalists and their financial strategy for the creation of a single global slave state. He mixes verifiable evidence exposing the international enemy, with pseudo-spiritual material which cannot be scrutinised other than according to the beliefs held by whoever examines them.  He also supports the long exposed Zionist Shill and Holocaustian, Alex Jones.  For anyone who purports to fight against the lies of the Establishment to associate themselves with a known gate-keeper and fear-mongerer, raises serious questions.

David Icke was at the forefront of the campaign to expose the pædophiles in the BBC, Westminster, and Windsor family.  His unrelenting assault of the likes of former Prime Minister, Edward Heath, are truly praise-worthy.  Likewise, Icke's focus upon the Rothschild dynasty has certainly helped to highlight the economic tactics of those who would enslave us all.  Indeed, by separating the natural and laudable Jewish Nationalism (Zionism) from the supremacist ideology of the Elders (Rothschild Zionism), Icke has paved the way for Jewish Nationalists to march side-by-side with others who have no truck with the plan to reduce everyone outside the global elite to serfs for the new overlords.  Of course, Icke doesn't delve into the Talmudic origin of the supremacist ideology of the 'Rothschild Zionists' and so exaggerates the number of ordinary Jews who believe themselves to be Chosen by their god to aid humanity as a whole, rather than to look down upon the Goyim in the manner of an insect to be crushed.  According to Icke, the Rothschild Zionists are the real danger, and the superstitious religious Jews who comprise the overwhelming number of Jews in the world, are harmless.  There are problems with this point of view.  However, the attempt to free the Jews from their Elders, thus breaking their support network, is at least worthwhile.

Whilst Icke has to be praised for his work exposing the financial aspects of the enemy, he embraces the New Age ideology that 'we are all one'.  This is a major problem.  In an article on his website, he published a video of the daily ceremony for the closure of the border between Pakistan and India.  The article can be found at the following link, which even in its title betrays Icke's hostility to the cultural integrity of any country: 

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/79485-i-cannot-tell-you-how-much-how-utterly-how-totally-how-absolutely-completely-to-the-core-of-my-being-i-wish-that-what-you-are-about-to-see-is-a-joke-but-to-my-eternal-despair-it-isnt

With astounding arrogance, Icke goes on to ridicule the cultural ceremony enacted by India and Pakistan; comparing it to Monty Python's Ministry of Silly walks.   Clearly for Icke, culture is irrelevant.  Culture, alongside ethnic homogeneity, is the very backbone of free nations.  Without that which makes us distinct, we are nothing but economic units at the mercy of the internationalists.  As if to emphasise his contempt for any expression of nationhood, he makes the comment,

'A word of advice ... just shut the frickin' gate, say goodbye, see you tomorrow tell the people watching not to be such a bunch of prats and then go home for your tea. Even better, don't shut the gate at all and just realise that we are all ONE.'

This is pure internationalism.  Icke advocates having no borders, and embracing a universalistic world view, in which everyone is equal, we are all the same, culture is a social construct to enslave us, we are all the same beneath the skin etc etc.  Although arguing against the 'New World Order' in nearly every article and presentation he makes, by embracing the idea that we are all the same, he embraces the very Cultural Marxism he purports to be against.

In another news item linked from his website, Icke applauds the rule of International Law!  Rather than demanding that the 'Israelis' leave Palestine and return to Khazaria, or relocate to Birobidjan, simply because they have no right to dwell upon Palestinian soil, the article cites International Law as the reason for Israel to relocate.  The article is not one of Icke's, but by linking it, he clearly endorses the right of the global elite to rule over peoples and territories due to the legal power they have given themselves. 

Icke has been criticised for his material relating to 'inter-dimensional shape-shifting reptilians' operating on a lower vibrational level of reality than humanity.   Substitute 'reptilians' for 'dæmons', and one can find a wealth of historical and mythological literature which indicates that what we perceive as reality is only a fraction of what exists.  Indeed, the path from dæmons to 'extra-terrestrials' to reptilians, is but a continuous redefinition of a phenomena which has been described throughout history.  It is not Icke's Reptilian theory which should cause concern, but his Universalism.  Whereas the reptile issue can be ignored, Icke's universalism can not.  Those who follow Icke are in danger of supporting the Internationalists without even realising they are doing so.  What better way to manage the opposition, than to lead it? 

Dismissing Icke's research would be to 'throw the baby out with the bath water'.  Perhaps this is the purpose of the sprinkling of dubious esoterica into otherwise useful material.  Is he a gate-keeper, or does he genuinely believe that differences in the material realm do not matter?  For someone who ceaselessly attacks religion, Icke is certainly operating from a spiritual perspective.  Regardless of his expressed outlook, Icke's Universalism leads directly to an acceptance of Internationalism; if Culture, Nation, Race, Land, Blood and Soil etc are meaningless, then what is there to fight for?  If we are all One, and this reality is a holographic illusion, then why bother to fight the common enemy at all?  Indeed, would that not make our oppressors one with us, thus making resistance to their machinations, resistance to our selves?  Would it not be a case of fighting shadows, such as in Plato's Allegory of the Cave?  For Icke to dismiss what makes us unique, yet simultaneously to argue against the International menace, is disingenuous and mutually-contradictory.

I like Icke.  I can ignore his more bizarre theories; such as the Moon being a spaceship.  I can turn a blind eye to his shameless claim to have invented the Hegelian Dialectic (or as he calls is, Problem, Reaction Solution).  Icke's ability to side-step the Holyhoax and blatant refusal to discuss the central lie upon which the whole international edifice is built, can be rationalised by arguing that should he discuss the fake Holocaust then he would be stopped from discussing anything important - although this argument is increasingly untenable when one considers that exposing the Holyhoax lie is vital to breaking the Talmudic stranglehold, and also considering that he freely taunts the monarchy on a daily basis, with no repercussions. When Icke pushes the nonsense that we are all one, and that expressions of cultural integrity should be stopped, then he embraces the very internationalism he claims to oppose.  

I was in two minds whether to write an article critical of David Icke, but when I see the direction he is herding his followers, then regardless of whether his intentions are benign or malicious, silence is no longer an option.  Would are enemies plant leaders in the Resistance, knowing that they could thereby stifle any real dissent?  Of course they would.  When Icke mocks the solution to internationalism - national freedom and deeper cultural unity with blood and soil - this has to be confronted.  Maybe he is genuine but misguided, and so may depart from this nonsense.  I certainly hope so, although I am less convinced with each passing day.  In the end, we don't need leaders, and the less we rely on others the better.  A led-opposition can be controlled and manipulated.