Israel is Right! (But its export ideology is wrong)

We live in a bizarre world in which our traditions are dismissed, our culture mocked, and our very biological essence is under attack.  The architects of the One World State understand that in order for the rule of internationalism to become an unshiftable reality, every country must be reduced to a mirror of every other.  There can be no mono-ethnic countries, no strong and resilient cultures, and no values apart from the pursuit of material gain.  Every country in the world is travelling this path, some faster than others, but every country is on this road to destruction.  Every country but one.

Israel stands out in this drive to global serfdom as a country with a strong culture, spiritual base, and a fierce defence of its ethnic homogeneity.  In our topsy-turvy world, this self-defence is scorned and attacked.  This reeks of the mentality of envy.  How often do we hear people complain that they feel affronted because they have to pay for something others do not?  For example, people in the UK who drive cars complain that they have to pay road tax, whilst cyclists who also use the road network do not.  Rather than whinge about how it isn't 'fair' that cyclists do not have to pay road tax, they should agitate for the abolition of road tax for everyone.  Such is the situation with regards to Israel.

I am not a fan of Israel by any means, however I do admire their staunch defence of nation.  Admittedly, their nation should dwell in Birobidjan, and not occupied Palestine, but be that as it may, their understanding of the absolute need for only one nation to live in any particular territory, is an understanding of nature.  Where we in Europe-worldwide have fallen, is that we have allowed the multi-cultists to make mono-ethnicity appear something abhorrent, whereas it is the only means for our survival.  The fact that it is from Jewish thinkers and activists that our multi-culti nightmare has come, does not detract from the value placed by the Jews in Israel, in the sovereignty of the nation.  Indeed, understanding that multi-culturalism is an act of aggression to prevent the survival of rivals to Talmudic power, only makes the logic of mono-culturalism more evident.

How does Israel differ from the UK?  Well, for a start, its military are not fighting across the globe to destabilise other countries - they are using the military of the UK to do it for them!  That may be loathsome, but it admittedly does keep the military where they are needed - at home, defending the country.

Israel has a very strong sense of identity.  Unlike the UK, which bends over backwards to foreigners, and prosecutes its own people for being critical of those within the borders who do not belong to the nation, Israel has a different strategy.  Israel has a healthy and natural policy of prohibiting foreigners from owning land or businesses within the country.  This policy extends to the point of confiscating land belonging to non-Jews, and expelling those who are not Israelis.  Admittedly, this means expelling the Palestinians from their own country, but hell, its a damned sight more logical than turning over cities to people who hate you!  Imagine Tel Aviv becoming a city where Jews are a minority and the non-Jewish population live on welfare benefits and have police protection to ensure no one so much as says Boo to them?  This is the reality in English-free ethnically-cleansed areas of London - areas which are expanding constantly.

Israel has a healthy attitude to its borders.  Rather than having politically correct citizens from every corner of the globe policing immigration controls (and deliberately targeting nationals for searches, so as to not appear 'racist'), Israel employs the military to conduct border control.  Israel has its military posted across the country, ensuring that non-Jews cannot disrupt the lives of Israelis.  The UK, on the other hand, has its police hiding under every stone, ready to persecute any indigenous folk who object to being second class citizens in their own country.  Of course, those the Israelis persecute are the rightful owners of the country, but regardless, the Israeli military and police defend the people of Israel, whereas the UK police exist to enforce the multi-culti destruction of the UK.

Israel defends its territorial integrity to the point of expanding into the territory of its neighbours to ensure the security of the homeland.  This extends to include control of the islands of Tiran and Sanafir, protecting the Gulf of Aqaba and access to the Red Sea.  The UK government has sold the port infrastructure to international corporations and given control of the entire UK to the new-Soviet (European) Union.  Again Israeli policy is sane, whereas the policy of the London regime is treason, pure and simple.  Certainly Israeli expansion enters into the realm of imperialism, which does not sit well with those who support freedom for everyone; but the UK government's betrayal of the indigenous population is collaboration with the imperialism of the international corporations - which, as an act of treachery, is actually, worse.

In the UK, we have the spectacle of Islamic Rape Gangs being allowed to carry on unmolested (unlike their White victims) for decades.  It took a Muslim sickened by the practice of sections of the Muslim community to bring the Rape crimes to prosecution, as the police were not interested.  Kudos to the Nazir Afzal, Chief Crown Prosecutor for Northwest England, for finally forcing this issue into court against the wishes of Social Services and the police.  In Israel, the idea of a non-Jew daring to 'groom'  (a euphemism for rape, beat and treat as sub-human) a Jewish girl, is unthinkable.  Unlike the UK with its outrageous education system which tells girls they must engage in race-mixing lest they be accused of 'racism' (preference of own, which is a bad thing, apparently), Israel has laws against miscegenation.  Those who commit this heinous crime against nature and nation, are severely punished.  Israel understands that the people and the land must be one, and that diluting either by allowing foreign ownership of anything, or any mixing of the blood, is suicide.

Ignoring the fact that Israel is built on Palestinian land, the attitude of Israel to non-Israelis within its borders is something to be admired.  If the UK was to adopt Israeli measures to deal with the colonists who refuse to depart the UK (following the offer of generous relocation grants), we would soon have our land back.  Of course sending the army in to clear out the real indigenous people of Palestine is not really a good thing, as it is, of course their country; just as our country is ours, and does not belong in any way to the colonists.  In contrast with Israel the UK is actively recruiting people from the colonies into the military, rather than using the military to keep our country safe and ethnically-homogeneous, thus exacerbating the decline of our homeland.

My only objection to Israel is that it is located in another nations land.  Israel's staunch defence of tradition, faith, culture, language, people, economy etc is something we should seek to bring to every nation.  Mutli-culturalism is a disease which needs to be cut out before it destroys the host population; its economic manifestation in international stock-market commerce equally has to be ended.

A world in which every country was like Israel in its treatment of its own people; putting them first in education, employment, health care, etc, would be a saner and healthier world.  A world in which multi-culturalism was prohibited, in favour of the protection and development of the culture of the people, would be a world of genuine Diversity.  A world in which ownership was restricted to the people of each country, excluding any foreign investment (economic theft by stealth), would be a world of genuine Equality, insofar as no country would be able to economically dominate any other.  Of course, in the case of Israel, that would mean forfeiting the handouts from Germany and the USA, and making an honest living like the rest of us. 

Rather than criticise Israel out of a sense that it isn't 'fair' that our country is a multi-culti basket case, and Israel isn't, we should seek to end the poisoning of our lands and restore them to a health which Israel enjoys.  Naturally, that would mean sending our Jewish guests on to the Jewish State, as enshrined in the Law of Return.  Having striven to steal the land on which Israel is built, the least the Jews can do is go live there.

In a free world, the architects of the internationalist nightmare will have to be re-educated.  Hopefully those of Jewish extraction contaminated with the multi-culti, feminist, perverse, anti-natural ideology designed to undermine 'goy' society, will be rehabilitated by the Rabbinate to become good patriotic members of their own homeland.

What's sauce for the Jew, is sauce for the Gentile.

Greece rejects Austerity and embraces the Natural order

The Bankers' plot to enslave us all is in trouble. In Greece, the 'austerity' measures of the international bankers have led to a resurgence of Greek pride.

In a defiant stand against the international bankers, the Greek population have voted for a collection of parties which reject the fleecing of Greek resources by the Rothschilds, and their fellow banking criminals.

Included in the raft of parties elected to the Greek parliament is the Golden Dawn.  Described by the Zionist media as Ultra-nationalist, far-right, extremist, neo-Fascist etc, Golden dawn stands for a Greek Greece, with priority in work and housing for Greeks.  In our lunatic politically correct world, any support for natural and wholesome patriotism is slandered as extreme.  It is the financiers who are raping Europe and waging war for profit who are extreme.  

The Jewish media have happily ignored the election of Communist parties to the Greek parliament, and instead focused their hatred on the Golden dawn for rejecting their internationalism.  To the Zionist mafia, all enemies are 'far-right', which highlights just how far the drive to materialism has pushed once free Europe.

Bravo to the people of Greece for standing up to the bankers and the traitor politicians who created the financial crisis and now seek to further profit from it by increasing the misery of the people.  If Greece can march on the path to freedom, we all can.  The days of making the people run by shouting 'Fascist!' are coming to an end.  Let us hope that populists such as the BNP who have squirmed to gain the kosher vote and have lost their support base as a result, take note.  No one respects toadying politicians with their fake smiles and insincerity; if they did, the Establishment would be the darlings of the people and not our despised foes.

Link to video of the Golden Dawn's parliamentary success: HERE


Update:

The 'democratic' system in Greece is patently just as absurd as the rest of Zionised Europe.  The failure of the major parties to form a coalition has given the excuse for Greece to re-run the process in a months time.  This is all very much like the fraudulent referenda favoured by Bruxelles.  As the Greeks have given a result that the international cabal does not like, they are to be made to vote again!  Let us hope that the Greeks hold true to their opposition and vote against austerity again.  Will the month before the election be used to dæmonise Golden Dawn and to push for an outright victory for parties who tow the internationalist line?  Was 9/11 a Zionist job?  Do bears defæcate in the woods?

The People of the UK: Not quite the Sheeple we're portayed to be.

On Thursday the 2nd May, England and Wales went to the polls to vote for local government.  Also, there were referenda in ten major cities to decide whether the UK should adopt the American system of directly electing Mayors.  The results of these elections are quite telling.

In the local elections, the usual knee-jerk reaction against the party of government saw losses for the Liberals and Conservatives.  Senior figures in the Conservative Party have now called for the dropping of lunatic policies such as the enforcement of measures to destroy marriage and allow the mentally ill and perverted to marry members of the same sex, presumably followed by legalising sex with donkeys.  Interestingly, the war criminal William Hague has refused to even consider dropping measures to homosexualise the UK, even though this policy is not only hated by the electorate, but by his own party.  Democracy is dead in the UK, and the government don't even bother to pretend otherwise.

The turn-out for the elections was well below 40%.  Two Thirds of the electorate did not vote.  This is refreshing.  Although the son of professional gas chamber escape artists, Ed Miliband, is crowing that the people voted for his Labour Party, the majority of the people are sufficiently awake to know that there is no point in voting, and so have stayed away, effectively giving the fake democratic system a vote of no confidence.  The zionised British National Party's vote also collapsed, proving that aping the Establishment, just doesn't work - which is in itself encouraging.  Perhaps now Mr Griffin will change the BNP's course away from a carbon copy of the old Conservative Party and push ahead with policies which put the people above the State.  (He has recently forged links with the Nationalist Movement in Ireland, which is a much needed step away from petty patriotism into full European Unity. This is a development worth watching, but how it pans out remains to be seen).

In the Mayorall referenda, the results have been a clear rejection of Directly-elected Mayors.  With the exception of Bristol, every city polled has said no to another tier of corrupt self-serving bureaucrats.  This defeat for the government comes in the wake of the defeat of the Proportional Representation Voting System, and Regional Assemblies.  In all three sets of referenda, the people have spoken, and said no to measures which would weaken the country and make it easier for it to be swallowed up by the European Union.  The people have spoken against the building blocks of World Government.  

Considering the abject failure of the Establishment to get the British people to vote as they like, it is no wonder that we are constantly denied referenda on membership of the EU, the Banking Bailout, Immigration, or anything which matters to the people.  No doubt the plan to turn the House of Lords into an elected Senate (rather than simply abolish it!) will be pushed through against the wishes of the people.  The last thing the UK (or any country for that matter) needs, is another level of government which will cost the taxpayer a fortune; but of course the wishes of the Establishment ride roughshod over what is good for the people.

We Britons have been lied to and schemed against for generations, in fact, for centuries.  It is heart-warming to see that the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Celts still stubbornly refuse to obey the Establishment.  Yes, One Third of the electorate voted in the local elections, but Two Thirds didn't, and in the referenda, with the exception of Bristol, the people voted NO, and in the case of Bristol, 3/4 of the people did not vote, thus not giving the position of Mayor a mandate!

The local elections and referenda were great examples of the underlying spirit of the people.  To quote the great GK Chesterton:

Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget,
For we are the people of England, that never has spoken yet.

Happy May Day

Today is May Day.  Although the current deluge would make one think otherwise, May day is the first day of summer.  Traditionally this is the day in which Morris Dancers black up and perform the Mummer plays.  Another festivity is the Maypole Dance, which celebrates the transition from Spring to Summer.

The puritans banned the May Day festivities, along with all activities which involved pleasure - such as drinking, eating good food, singing et al.  The devastating impact of protestant extremists seizing government can still be experienced in our bland food and are readiness to obey laws prohibiting pleasure, and also in the tendency of some people to react to the overpowering nanny state by overindulging in excessive hedonism.  The aftershocks of Puritan rule still do harm to the UK even now.

In recent years, May Day has been hijacked by the materialistic and divisive 'Workers' festival, in which the artificially created class divisions are emphasised.  International Workers' Day is a fraudulent event.  The Class Struggle is based on the lie that people can be divided into opposing camps based solely on whether they work at the level of production and service, or in management or at ownership level.  To the twisted Marxist mind, the independent trader is an agent of oppression, whereas the lowly bureaucrat who implements all manner of tyranny, is a comrade.  The Marxist ideology deals with the masses against the rulers, but fails to address the real division of the people, which is a matter of genetics, as can be found in the disproportionate number of Jews in the Ruling Class.  Our battle isn't worker against owner, but indigenous folk versus alien usurper.

There are good people across all levels of society, thus classifying those who have leadership abilities as the enemy, is foolhardy.  Likewise, all non-owners and non-managers are placed in the same category as the debased selfish, egocentric and ignorant chavs.  The real spirit of May Day celebrates the innate qualities of the people, who are joined by a bond which does not recognise contrived materialistic division.  

Gentiles of the world unite!  We must stand shoulder-to-shoulder against the common enemy, until the eternal victory.  May Day is a celebration of freedom, not a day to whine about manufactured woes.   Those who speak of the Workers' Struggle, are of the same ilk as those who murdered the Kulaks, or the 'intellectuals' in Cambodia who sinned against the self-appointed guardians of the people by having poor eyesight.  May Day is a festival for the celebration of the human worth of the peasantry as a part of the organic natural society.  Those who would hijack this day have murdered millions of ordinary people, mostly peasants.  As we celebrate our day, we must do so with an eye on the machinations of those who would usurp it, and to borrow a phrase beloved of  their kin, Never Forgive, Never Forget.

Let all of us in the Celtic heartland, and across the kindred world celebrate our traditions and revel in the pleasure of joining together to enjoy nature and humanity itself.

The Jewish Siege of Europe

The following article is by Nathanael Kapner of Real Zionist News. I reproduce it here in full as it contains information everyone should be aware of, especially the supremacist, anti-Goy, European Jewish Parliament...

_________________

THE JEWISH SIEGE OF EUROPE is now in full battle manoeuvres, engagement and encirclement.

Under the umbrella of the European Jewish Union, (the uniting structure for all Jewish organisations throughout Europe), a brand new No-Goys-Allowed organisation was inaugurated on February 17, 2012, the “first ever” European Jewish Parliament.

Although the European Jewish Parliament is an obvious racist organization, the EU Parliament, which claims to represent ALL minorities, opened its doors to these Christ-Hating Jews by allowing them to hold their “inaugural” ceremony in its own headquarters in Brussels.

Hailed as a “great day” for Europe, 120 members of the European Jewish Parliament toasted their election with declarations of it marking an “historic event” in which “one assembly standing for one cause” further “empowers” European Jewry.

And that Jewish “empowerment” wasted no time in making demands upon the cowering Gentile European majority, (once known as Christendom before Jewry’s onslaught), insisting on the termination of Lady Catherine Ashton as the EU’s foreign minister.

AN ALL-OUT JEWISH blood-lust campaign against Baroness Ashton is now armed to the teeth in which the Jewish Parliament is demanding that she either “repent” or “resign.” View Jew Demand Here.

The Jewish hysteria centres around Ashton’s comments on April 13 regarding the killing of four Jews at the Ozar Hatorah school in Toulouse France last month.  Condemning Lady Ashton for drawing a “despicable” moral equivalent between the Toulouse killings and the Israeli assaults on Gaza, the European Jewish Parliament wants nothing less than Ashton’s blood.

Evidently, Jewry pays no gratitude to those who host their Jewish balls and ceremonies, namely, Brussels, which gave the Jews full use of its parliamentary headquarters on February 17, 2012.  Only two months later, the Jews repaid Brussels by demanding it throw its highly esteemed foreign minister into the rubbish heap and flush her down the toilet.  SUCH is the manner of the Jew: vicious castigation, arrogance, ingratitude, and overweening hubris.

WHEN JEWRY WAS FORBIDDEN 

CHRISTIAN BYZANTIUM extended from the Balkans to Western Europe during the 4th through 15th Centuries AD.  Thus, the Byzantine Empire, (not taught, of course, in Jew-run Public Schools and Colleges), was known to its inhabitants as “Rhomania” because Constantine the Great, Byzantium’s first Emperor from 306 to 337 AD, established the empire’s centre in Constantinople as the “New Rome.” 

In addition to being a Christian civilisation in which the Church worked in “symphony” with the State, (as today in Putin’s Russia), Byzantium had one further characteristic, namely, its claim to be the direct continuation of the Roman Empire, a claim maintained until its fall in 1453 at the hands of Muslim invaders. One essential feature of the Byzantine Empire was its policy toward the Jews. This policy was codified by Emperor Justinian in the 6th Century AD, popularly known as, “The Code of Justinian.” 

 

JUSTINIAN’S CODE FORBADE Jews from holding civil office and teaching positions. Even part of the Orthodox Church’s “canon law” prohibited its members from seeking out “remedies” from Jewish physicians.  Compiling various laws regarding the Jews that were established before him into a legal codification, Justinian forbade Jews:

+ To engage in proselytism;  
+ To marry Orthodox Christian women;  
+ To possess Orthodox Christian servants;  
+ To hold office or honours in the Roman state;  
+ To build new synagogues;  
+ To read the Old Testament in Hebrew but rather in Greek which did not cut out  the prophecies that pointed to Jesus Christ;  
+ To use Judaic interpretations of the Old Testament;  
+ To bear witness in court against an Orthodox Christian;  
+ To hold teaching positions in Roman schools or as private tutors.

The culmination of Justinian’s “Codex” was the denial of Roman citizenship to the Jews and relegating them to the rank of second class citizens.  In spite of Jewry calling Justinian an “anti-Semite,” the Orthodox Church not only honours him as a great Emperor but also as a great saint. View Entire Prohibitions Here, Here, Here & Here.

THE SOLUTION TO THE JEWISH PROBLEM is for Europe to return to its Christian roots—the historical Church—in which the “evangelical” error that posits the Jew as “chosen” and having some “special” role to play has no place.

Neo-paganism and idyllic myths that salivate over Indo-European “gods” promoted by White-Identity Websites will only provide the Jew with yet another stepping stone to greater hegemony over the political affairs of European society.

Wagner (a profound master) and his operas indeed are milestones in the evolution of classical music.  But to elevate Wagner’s Nordic Wordens and Fricas to realms of some new European “reformation” is not only laughable but historically shallow.

“Europe Is The Church and The Church Is Europe!” said the great 20th Century historian, Hilaire Belloc.

It is via the historical Church, and ONLY the historical Church, that the Jewish siege of Europe can be opposed, dismantled, and ultimately destroyed.

Adolf Hitler 123

Today is the 123rd anniversary of the birth of Adolf Hitler.  Much has been written about Hitler, and much is still being written.  To some he was the man who led the fight against Bolshevism and Capitalism; to others he was the patsy who was used by organised world Jewry to destroy the last bastion of defence against the fulfilment of the Protocols of Zion.

What Hitler was not, is a mass murderer of Jews.  He interned the Jewish population in transit camps prior to the proposed Final Solution to the Jewish Problem in Europe - their expulsion and relocation to a Jewish homeland away from Europe; to somewhere they could only corrupt and destroy one another.  To this end, he embraced Zionism and guaranteed the safety and well-being of the Jews in Europe in the transit camps.  He didn't gas anyone.

Hitler presided over the NSDAP with its programme for the abolition of the Class System and the evils of Usury.  He promoted Motherhood and respect for Nature.  He opposed all the sick and decadent outpourings of the Freemasons, Marxists, Feminists, and other products of the Talmud.  He promoted culturally-cohesive music and art, in place of the degenerate perverse modernist obscenities of his day.  He would certainly not have allowed for young women such as Rihanna to defile and degrade themselves in the manner of prostitutes, such as in her semi-pornographic video for the single S&M.

Hitler's economic, social and cultural policies were extraordinary.  Had it not been for the war of imperialist expansion into Mother Russia, the ideology of National Freedom and Social Justice would have prevailed, and the anti-human international reign of the self-Chosen elite would have been averted.  This, of course, is where Hitler's role in the war comes in to question.  Was he duped into fighting and betrayed by those he relied upon?  Did he really believe the British would join the anti-Bolshevik crusade and underestimated the stranglehold of Jewry over the UK?  Or, was he an asset of the international menace whose function from the outset was to create Israel on Palestinian land and imprison free Europe in the neo-Soviet EU?

The ideology of National rebirth was, and remains, vibrant and healthy.  Those who paint the 'New World Order' of the multi-culti international materialists as Nazi, or even more ridiculously as Fascist, merely parrot the propaganda of the Elders, and are either unwitting, or (in the case of Alex Jones) consummate, liars.  Only National Freedom can halt the drive to a one world state ruled by the Rothschilds and their fellow Talmudists.  National Freedom has no respect for imperialism of any kind, but rather exists on mutual respect for the cultural and national integrity of every individual nation and country.  Regardless of one's opinion of Hitler, his unforgivable sin was the treatment of the Slavic nation as Untermenschen.  There is no place for supremacist idiocy in any movement for true freedom.  To adopt a supremacist attitude is to behave as our Talmud-loving enemies.  Its simply not on.

Hitler was certainly an intriguing character, and perhaps one day it will be possible to separate the propaganda from the facts.  It is certainly a task worth undertaking.  It is also worth exploring the forbidden ideologies, for they have only been so vilified so as to keep us away from ideas which could lead to the salvation of all humanity.

Bradford: A city nestling in truly amazing countryside: Countryside under attack

In what seems like the blink of an eye, my holiday is over.  Not being exactly the richest person in the world, my holiday did not involve treks abroad, but in fact consisted solely in trips around my corner of my own county.  To mention the name Bradford and pleasure in the same sentence may seem odd, but this week in the drizzly metropolitan area has been a real pleasure indeed.

Bradford is a city of contrasts, as are of course all cities.  There are comparatively rich areas sitting side by side with areas of abject poverty.  The city is famous for its large Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities, but less is said of the Irish areas, parts such as Little Germany, or even, yes really, those which remain populated by people indigenous to Yorkshire.  The stereotype of a Minaret visible from every major thoroughfare may be true for some districts, but to proclaim this to be the case for the entire city is to exaggerate into the realms of fiction.

Cities are not good places for people to live.  Living in extremely close proximity to one's neighbours leads to the inevitable invasion of space which can cause friction.  Stress levels in the city are higher than in the country, and the break from nature is unhealthy physically, mentally and spiritually.  Although Bradford is a large city, and is joined to its larger neighbour, Leeds, with no perceivable gap, it is bordered by areas of open countryside which are breath-taking.

To the northeast of Bradford is the old town of Baildon, from which the open moors are no distance.  In this area is the tiny village of Esholt, famous for the television soap, Emmerdale.  However, for the non-tourists, Esholt is home to St Leonard's Farm.  The farm is a mecca for people living in the urban sprawl, where they can enjoy the peace of the country, the ability to feed and pet farm animals, and have their children play safely with other children.  There are not many open farms, but their appeal clearly indicates the need for the people to stay in touch with nature.

To the west of the city is another farm which is open to the public.  Keelham Farm has a small area set aside for petting sheep and goats, but is mainly a shop.  The scale of the shop is impressive, and rivals that of the larger supermarkets.  Keelham Farm is a hub for local farm produce and sells all manner of food at prices which are comparable with the rootless international concerns.  Unlike such monstrosities as Tesco, ASDA (Walmart), etc, the goods are produced locally and all revenue stays in the local community.  There is no need to search for Fair Trade labels, as all the produce is ethically sound.  I would highly advise everyone to abandon the supermarkets and go to farm shops where possible.  It is well worth searching for local producers from whom we can purchase without fear of supporting the internationalist exploitation economy.

The city of Bradford has many slum areas which desperately need to be pulled down.  The well-being of all the people would be greatly enhanced if the city was systematically divided into small towns and villages, with the concrete wastelands replaced with new areas of farmland, and countryside.  The atmosphere in the districts with access to nature is palpably saner and happier than in those where there is nothing but grey stone and asphalt.

The London Establishment created the cities which now house the penned-in population.  They themselves live in homes surrounded by open land; refusing to live as they would like to force the rest of us to.  There is something odious about city life.  The Establishment understand this, but are in a position to avoid what they create for the rest of us.

Driving home from Esholt I passed several fields with protest signs calling for their protection.  Over at Keelham, the urban sprawl which was once miles away, is now visible, and surely will consume the area in due course.  These last areas of open land are under attack.  The decision by the London regime to allow building on Green Belt land will allow for the creation of super-cities from Liverpool to Hull and Leeds to London.  The potential damage to the psyche of the people, not to mention the land itself, is astounding.

We need to defend our land.  The Establishment have effectively began a new phase of the Enclosures Act, which created the dehumanising cities in the first place.  This time, the land will be enclosed in order to build an urban nightmare in which the very essence of humanity will be crushed.  We cannot allow this.

Sitting in fields singing protest songs does not work.  Passive Resistance has failed.  We are at war with the international menace which is based in the City of London.  We need to readjust our tactics to take on a war footing.  

People are people, and no attacks on our fellow humans is acceptable, but attacks on their material assets are fully justifiable.  A building site cannot operate if the machinery has been sabotaged.  Builders cannot erect hideous anti-natural structures if they have no tools or hardware.  A business will not proceed if its costs are such that the venture becomes unprofitable.  We need to break out from the hippy-mentality of the 1960s in which singing songs and waiting for the police to physically move the protestors along, was the entire strategy.  The Flower Power idea was a commercial con trick to sell fashion and fads, but it achieved nothing.  The 1960s paved the way for the destructive polices of the State in the 1970s, such as mass immigration and membership of the EU.  Sadly, protest seems to have become stuck in an era in which it was encouraged by the media - precisely because it didn't work.

Wherever you live in the world, be it Bradford, or the vast world outside Yorkshire (!), the internationalists are coming for your land, your health, your culture, and perhaps even your souls.  We are being controlled by a handful of tyrants, served by an army of selfish opportunists.  We cannot get to the tyrants, but we can get to those who serve them because it is personally profitable.  The greedy builders who concrete over our land; the CCTV security firms who place cameras on every street; the rip-off merchants who drive down our standard of living with their goods produced by exploitation - all of these are vulnerable if we strike at their material assets.  

The internationalist order exists because good people do nothing in the face of the actions of their greedy and unscrupulous fellow citizens.  If we can make obedience to the Establishment financially un-viable, the legions of unwitting collaborators will stop doing the bidding of our enemies.  Then we will win.  Sabotage is not a dirty word.  In this war, it is our duty to fight back and to persuade those who would collaborate with the enemy that doing so will cost them the ability to house and feed their families.  Appealing to human decency hasn't worked.  It is time to put down the carrot, and pick up the stick.

Having enjoyed a full ten days in which I have been able to take my family to increasingly threatened areas of beauty, has made me realise just how much we are set to lose if we do not stop those who are motivated by greed.  The good thing about people who are materialistic is that they cannot see anything of higher worth than that which is measured in monetary terms.  This is their Achilles Heel, and as they are the ones who implement the strategy of the Establishment, it is also the soft underbelly of the enemy.  

Locating a weak spot is one thing, but acting on it is another.  We have too much to lose by cowering behind legalities as an excuse to do nothing.  Waiting for others to act is to become a spectator in your own demise.  The time is now, and the Resistance is us.  It is time to turn academic study into real tangible action.  We owe it to our ancestors and our descendants to keep our world alive, and to destroy that of the enemy.

14 Defining Characteristics of Zionist-Materialism

Like Pavlov's dogs, there is a tendency for people to shriek hysterically at the mention of the word 'Fascist'.  For most people, no attempt is made to understand what is meant by Fascism, and thus they fall into the trap of attacking an ideology just because the Establishment media tell them to.  Such people probably believe in the 6 million kosher corpses yarn, and wet the bed upon hearing tales of the latest Zionist Islamic  al CIAda Al Qaeda plot, scurrying to their Zionist democratic owners representatives for protection.  For grown up, culturally, spiritually and politically awake individuals, this acceptance of Establishment-induced hysteria is really not a good thing.

Gregory Patin, writing for the informative and read-worthy Activist Post, has fallen into the 'boo hiss' anti-Fascist trap.  His article, '14 defining characteristics of fascism' takes at face value the work of secular humanist, Laurence Britt, which defines Fascism as the ultimate evil.  Patin then runs with this assumption and paints the 'New World Order' as Fascistic and presumably as a plot to exterminate the Jews

Patin's acceptance of Britt's analysis is interesting in itself, and indicates his ideological prejudice.  To seriously align oneself to the 'left', or the 'right' to the exclusion of opposing ideologies and ways of thought, is to acquiesce in one's own enslavement.  Left and Right are Establishment-created divisions, such as the manufactured Class Warfare which pits owner against worker; white collar against blue.  We need to steer clear of these divisions and see the value of unity.  Those who seek to polarise us into rival camps are the one's who control every manufactured division.  The only division we should tolerate is the splitting off of those who support the internationalist enslavers, from those who oppose them; no one should aid the despots who feel themselves to be superior to the rest of humanity, even to the point of believing some non-existent deity Chose them to be that way.

Patin deals with the USA in his work, but his research could equally be applied to the EU or many other countries.  The 14 Characteristics of Fascism he cites, can be summarised as follows:

1. Nationalism
2. Human Rights abuses
3. Scapegoating of enemies (e.g. Jews, Muslims)
4. Militarism
5. Sexism/Homophobia and opposition to the murder of unborn children
6. Controlled media
7. National Security paranoia
8. Unification of State and Faith
9. Protection of Corporate power
10. Undermining Workers' Rights
11. Opposition to degenerate art
12. Police State
13. Corruption and Cronyism
14. Election Fraud

This list highlights the thinking of Britt, and its adoption betrays the motives of Patin.  The list is dishonest, and links together aspects of the internationalist agenda with measures to oppose it.

Starting with the points highlighted in red, which could be called fascistic, let us examine how these apply to the USA:

(1) Recently, school pupils were admonished for chanting USA! USA!  Nationalism may be a characteristic of fascism, but it most certainly is not a characteristic of the government of the USA.  Just as in the UK, expression of patriotism is encouraged, but nationalism is forbidden.  Why?  Because Patriotism is loyalty to the State, whereas Nationalism is loyalty to the people.  Internationalism seeks the destruction of all which differentiates individuals and nations, thus Nationalism is defence against Internationalism, and so is forbidden by the architects of the Single Global State. 

(5) Protection of the family and the unborn as living humans, not as things to throw away like rubbish, is in fact on the decline in the USA.  Defence of womanhood and the preservation of the natural society are under serious attack.  Is the defence of the unborn, and the preservation of healthy and natural family structures Fascistic?  Certainly.  But part of the politically correct drive in the Obamanation of North America?  Hardly.  If anything, the US Establishment is hetero-phobic and controlled by militant homosexuals.  President Obama himself is a homosexual who enjoys receiving fellatio from white men.  He has staffed the White House with all manner of perverts.  Under his administration, the unborn are under attack like never before.  The destruction of marriage, the reduction of women from sacred mothers to wage slaves, and the rampant abortion on demand culture all stand in opposition to what is good for society.  Sorry Patin, but on this one you are very, very, wrong.

(8)  If Patin believes that the US regime has adopted a religious fervour, he may be correct.  However, his attempt to link the US Establishment with Christianity is an outright lie.  Yes, the regime do go on pilgrimages to the Holy Land, but not to Bethlehem or to Calvary; they go to the Wailing wall to insert bits of paper into a wall to ask the Jewish God for favours.  Patin has a point on this one; the government USA has abandoned the country's Christian heritage and now worships at the Synagogue of Satan.  Forgive me for stating the bleeding obvious, but Fascism was against the elevation of the Jews to gods over the Gentiles.  Naughty naughty Patin.  A good try, but this stinks of deception.

(11) Degenerate art is injurious to the soul of the people.  Decadent and sickening 'art' and sex-obsessed 'music', not to mention psychologically damaging filth from Hollywood and the Talmudic porn industry, are a part of the new USA.  Inspiring and invigorating real art are dismissed as old-fashioned and fascist, and have been condemned to the memory hole in Zionised countries such as the USA and UK.  Again Patin attacks something wholesome, which is exactly the strategy of the Establishment.

To turn to the remaining points, those in blue are quite subjective, and some are more misleading than others.

(2, 4, 7 & 12) Human Rights abuses and militarism?  Yes the rights of the people of the USA are being systematically undermined, and yes the country is becoming more militarised, but does this indicate that the country is under Fascist control?    The Fascist regimes 'abused' the Human Rights of the Freemasons by banning them, and also the rights of the enemies of the people, by interring them.  The US government attacks the right of people to worship, to speak their minds, to associate with and employ people of their own kind.  The abuses of the Obama regime are anti-Fascist.  As for militarism, military power obeys whoever orders it, and the ideology of the ruling power is of no relevance to the soldiers under their control.  Likewise for National Security and the Police State; these are administrative issues which can occur even under the most liberal of democracies, especially at times of war.

(3) The scape-goating of enemies in the USA is beyond scape-goating; the enemies highlighted by the media have been manufactured and are in many cases paid and controlled by the Establishment (e.g. Al CIAda).  This is a sneaky one from Mr Patin.  Here he tries to link the removal of Jews from positions of influence in Europe, with the attacks against Muslims by the US Government.  This sleight of hand brings images of the fake holocaust to mind, in which the Jews were moved to transit camps for their eventual relocation to Palestine, and significantly, to the USA.  The subject of the holocaust is too complex to go into here, but there is a wealth of information to indicate that the Jews were neither scape-goated (insofar as their leaders WERE and ARE at war with humanity), or gassed.  There is much information about this on the forum at this link.  For Patin to eagerly accept the 6 million canard and indeed to link it to the Zionist assault on Islam and Christianity is disingenuous to say the least.  Scape-goating is a characteristic of Zionist thinking, and was practised by the Talmudic rulers of the USSR to silence critics.  It is known today as political correctness, and there is nothing Fascistic about that.

(6) The media in the USA is controlled by the Zionist Internationale.  Under Fascism, the media has to serve the people by producing art, music and entertainment which is culturally enriching.  Control of information is an unfortunate reality in the Fascist system, and one of its points which is problematic.  A system of free media would of course be better for the people, but control always rests with the editors, owners and those who oversea the media as a whole.  In the USA there is such a thing as Public Service Broadcasting, which allows for anyone to speak as he or she feels.  This is a wonderful thing which those of us in fully controlled countries such as the UK, look to with admiration.  The advent of political correctness has undermined the freedom of the media, and the take-over of small-scale media by large international concerns has all but eradicated the free press.  What is left is online media such as this, and the Internet itself is under threat.  The power behind the erosion of freedom is associated with the Rothschilds, Murdoch, Reuters et al, all of whom are a part of the Zionist network.  A free media is a requisite of a free country, and Fascism fails this test.  However, to label the Zionisation of the western media as Fascist is a mistake.  I can see Patin's point here, but the correlation is messy, and does not stand up to scrutiny.

(9 & 10)  Patin refers to Corporatism, but fails to distinguish between the Corporatism of Mussolini, and the modern Corporatism which shares its name, but stands in diametrical opposition.  The Corporatism of Fascism binds together the workers and owners as a cooperative unit who work for the well being of the nation.  Workers' Rights are not undermined, but are enhanced as the workers are a part of the corporation, and not merely servants or employees.  This is the very basis of Fascism and Syndicalism, and Patin errs by linking it with the destructive money-worshipping international corporatism of today.  Under Fascism, there was no 'out-sourcing' to countries overseas, where as in international corporatism, out-sourcing to Communist China has reached the point where hardly anything in the USA (or EU) is made anywhere but China.  The point of the Corporate State was to rein-in the power of industry, in order to make it serve the people.  To this end, foreign ownership of the means of production, and the usurious practices of the stock market were forbidden.  Patin here labels the internationalist take-over of the economy as Fascistic.  It is as far removed from Fascism as is imaginable.

(13 & 14)  Corruption, Cronyism and Election Fraud are certainly rife in the USA.  Patin's attempt to label the government as Fascists due to their selfishness and promotion of kin and fellow parasites is intriguing.  Is he here trying to dirty the name of the Fascist movements by associating them with the decadent materialists of the modern age?  Elections were not fought according to party and the ability to throw money behind candidates who lied to gain office; parties were banned due to their divisive nature.  Comparing the two systems makes no sense, unless the objective is to dirty the name of one with the other.  Ironically Patin seeks to use Fascism to undermine the character of the gangsters in Congress, the Senate and the White house!  If only their level of corruption equalled that of the Fascists of bygone days.  As fallible as they were, they were saints in comparison with the vipers in power today.

All-in-all, Patin's attempt to use the Fascist epithet to attack the government of the USA, rests on the refusal of the people to take the time to study the truth behind the label.  Fascism was far from perfect, but it did provide a workable opposition to internationalism.  This is most likely why it is so often used to describe internationalism, and to thereby make people run from what could be a good defence against our developing enslavement.

Demonstration gegen den Euro-rettungswahnsinn

Tomorrow there will be a demonstration in Karlsruhe against the European Stability Mechanism.  This demonstration will be the first of three in Germany, with the next in Stuttgart on the 5th May, returning to Karlsruhe on the 16th June.

There is much talk of Chancellor Merkel seeking to build a new German Empire.  The common use of the term 'Fourth Reich' has the effect of linking the Chancellor with the Third Reich of the NSDAP.  However, this misses a crucial point, which is that Merkel was raised in the DDR as a Calvinist, and is a fervent internationalist.  Rather than building a new Empire for Germany, she is part of a cabal intent on destroying all the constituent nations of Europe.  Germany, just as every other nation, is scheduled for assimilation into the international materialist machine, in which no identity, culture, or even race will be allowed to continued; except for that of the self-Chosen rulers.

The fact that there are protests in Germany tomorrow and over the next few months, highlights that every country is under attack.  The protests are not organised by any political parties, and are not leftist or rightist.  This is a shew of unity of all Germans against the European Union, and specifically against the destructive Euro currency and the bankers' Euro Stability Mechanism.

If you have the chance to get to any of these demonstrations, please do not take any political banners which could be used to divide the opposition to the internationalist mafia into left or right camps.  This is an issue above and beyond left and right.  With the strikes in Spain, the unrest in Greece, and the growing anger in the UK and indeed every EU State, now is the time for real European Unity.  No doubt the State will send in the usual under-cover police 'Black Bloc Anarchists' to besmirch the name of the protestors.  Steer well clear of any such elements who only serve the Establishment,

Let us join with our brethren across the continent and fight for a real European Union of free nations, working together, but not joined by bureaucratic institutions which have nothing to do with the wishes of the people: a Europe of a hundred flags, with no single currency, citizenship, passport or government.

For more information, visit:

http://eurodemostuttgart.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/virale-attacke/

Rural Living versus Urban Existence

Spring has arrived, and with it the natural urge to reconnect with the land. As an Urban-dweller presently trapped in an area which resembles the opening scenes of Monty Python's Meaning of Life, (albeit one with a vast Muslim population, rather than a Catholic one!) I am acutely aware of the contrast between Urban Existence, and Rural Life.

There are those who claim that the entire population of the Earth could live in England; and this is probably correct if everybody was forced to live in a vast expanse of concrete.  The implication in the assertion that England is far from over-crowded, is that the quality of life of urbanites is in no way inferior to the quality of life of those who live close to nature.  I wonder how many of those who parrot this misleading and useless information would be willing to live in such an urban monstrosity?

Urban life is not real.  We have manufactured pleasures which are reliant upon technology and commerce.  Many of us do not even have a small garden in which to enjoy some connection with living matter.  Our children play in the streets, not the fields, and many do not understand that the food they eat comes from somewhere other than the supermarket or fast-food take-away.  It is alarming but true, that some parents do not bother to take their children on trips to the country; favouring instead trips to 'theme parks' where they can be bombarded with the noise, lights and fumes of the mechanised rides.  Fun is associated with money; hedonism is regarded as the highest virtue; decadence and debauchery are considered normal.  Urban life is a lingering death.

Rural living links the people to the land, and for this reason provides a barrier against the machinations of the State.  Such is the antipathy of the Establishment to anything which goes against the internationalist agenda, that even the word Peasant has negative connotations in England.  Peasants are the backbone of the land.  It is the Stockbrokers, Bankers and Bureaucrats who should be reviled, not the honourable peasantry.

Travelling from one urban centre to another, I have the opportunity to get off the main roads and to enjoy a longer travel home through the countryside.  The magnificence of nature has the power to restore the senses after a hard days work.  When I was a Civil Servant, I lived and worked in the same town, and didn't see so much as a single field or farm animal throughout the week.  For a period I had no car, and didn't see anything of nature for months.  The stress of work became a permanent feature of life with no reconnection with nature to cleanse the urban decay.  The need for a link to the land should not be underestimated.

An alarming trend in England is for the towns to be extended along the main roads which link them.  This is creating urban corridors of strips of concreted land, behind which swathes of countryside are becoming enclosed; the cut off rural land is then considered a part of the urban setting and is 'developed'.  On my travels I can see this process in action.  In the Bradford Metropolitan District, the city of Bradford is growing along its main arteries, in a manner not dis-similar to the reaching tentacles of an octopus.  Where these arteries connect with major roads connecting other towns, long stretches of new built houses are springing up.  In time, the unspoilt countryside which provides much needed relief from the bland grey buildings of Bradford and its satellite towns, will be built over.  The rise in crime which will follow is a direct result of the severing of the bond between land and people.

In England literally millions of new houses are being built; turning the 'green and pleasant land' into a grey unpleasant slum.  It is noteworthy that those who designed the 'vertical streets' (tower blocks) of modern towns, do not choose to live in them.  The social engineers who dictate how we should live, defend themselves from the evils of urban life; living either in enclosed communities where the plebs cannot go, or in large houses with enough land for a private garden at the very least.  The social engineers and urban architects would not consider living as those imprisoned in their creations have to.  I do not begrudge these people the right to live in a way which is mentally and spiritually satisfying; although I do find their hypocrisy irksome.

It is human nature to live in close proximity to the land.  One need only think of lottery winners who immediately buy a large house with enough land to ensure privacy for the occupants.  Do lottery winners living in the country use their winnings to buy a flat in a typical urban tower block, boxed in by people on every side, with such niceties as the stench of stale urine in the noisy and bumpy lifts?  Methinks not.  

Rural living allows for the development of real communities in which genuine human links exist.  A rural life with space to grow food for one's own consumption, or maybe to trade with neighbours, reduces one's reliance upon supermarkets and all the dangers associated with such evils as genetically modified and otherwise doctored food.  A child who can see animals behaving as nature intends, will have no need of the bizarre neo-Soviet sex-education lessons of the Establishment's schools.  Of course, the Establishment want us to be reliant on the internationalist corporations for our survival, and for our childrens' education.  The countryside is a threat to their plans.

Why is natural living scorned?  Who abhors rural and manually productive life?  There is a people who take pride in being 'cosmopolitans', and who see city life as the only worthy life.  These people have ruined England, and indeed everywhere they have touched.  These people reject the natural labour of the peasantry, favouring instead to manipulate finance whilst studiously avoiding any real work which is to the genuine benefit of the people.  Thankfully the Edict of Expulsion (1290) is still on the statute books so removing these negative beings from our land only requires enforcing the law!

The State argue that more houses must be built across the UK to accommodate the millions of migrants from across the EU and further afield.  This is complete lunacy.  We do not need more immigration.  We have millions of unemployed people in this country already, and bringing more people in to compete for work will only exacerbate the problem.  The solution to housing millions more people coming into the country is to not allow them in.  There is nothing 'racist' about protecting the land and ring-fencing the country's resources for those to whom it belongs.  The policy of the Establishment is the real racism, as can be seen by the anti-Eastern European hysteria of the media which sits side by side with sob stories demanding the admission of more people from the non-European world.  Building new homes is about socially engineering the extermination of the indigenous population, and if it enriches greedy building corporations at the same time, all the better.

A country which cannot feed itself is at the mercy of the corporations who control the transport networks and the production of food.  For the British Isles, the reliance upon shipping is especially pertinent.  During the Second World War the population of the UK was many millions fewer than it is today, and the available farm land was much greater; yet still the country would have reached starvation point if the transatlantic food supply had been cut.  The policy of building over agricultural land, and driving the population up, is a policy which in years to come will result in starvation in the UK.  This can only be averted if the non-indigenous population are helped to return home to lands which are free of the international pariahs who have driven them out, and if the UK cities are broken up to provide direct access to the land for all the people.  It doesn't take the powers of Nostradamus to see that very serious problems will come if current trends are not halted and reversed. 

The obliteration of the land is nothing new.  The Zionist regime in London promoted the destruction of rural Wales for the benefit of the 'English' rulers.  This prompted the creation of the resistance movement, Meibion Glyndŵr, who destroyed the colonial outposts of the London regime.  Certainly many ordinary people were affected, but the message was sent loud and clear that the Welsh country is sacred to the Welsh people.  In the case of new built housing scarring the land, any action which can make building economically un-viable is merit worthy to stop the criminal destruction of our land.  This could include occupation of building sites, obstruction of supply routes or any other methods which are not injurious to human life .  If it could be done in Wales, why cannot the English and Scots stand up for what is theirs?

We are a part of the land.  Urban life is un-natural and is hazardous to both physical and mental health.  Rather than joining in the Talmudic howling against the peasantry, we should be standing by our brethren who live outside the cities.  We can look after our children by taking every opportunity to get them out of the cities to visit farms, woodland, and the real country beyond the concrete jungle.  Our ultimate objective must be to abandon the cities altogether and give our children the chance to live in a sane and cultural and spiritually strong environment; they will not get anything of worth in the urban environment, unless one considers materialism, degeneracy and decadence virtuous.

We need to halt the expansion of towns into our sacred land, and indeed to demand that the current cities be broken up.  Against all that is wholesome and sane, the Government have announced plans to make it easier for the land to be desecrated by the vandals of the building industry, in order to turn our land into a concrete mess with nothing to distinguish the territory or people from that of anywhere else in the world.  We must resist this.  Too much of our land is already under concrete, and we cannot tolerate the further destruction of the land of our ancestors, which we are duty bound to keep safe for our descendants.  If the State has its way, there will be no 'Green Belt', no countryside, and ultimately, no country to pass on to those who come after us.  The Government is at war with the people, and we need to readjust how we deal with them to take this alarming fact into account.  If not for ourselves, then for those who will inherit this nightmare world, we must take action to stop the enemy now before their victory is assured.  If they win, we will not recover.  This is a struggle for life itself.  To sit on the sidelines and watch their victory is to collaborate in our own demise.  The battle is no longer taking place over in far off lands, it is here, it is now.

Remembering Mussolini; the Benevolent Dictator

I had a very strange encounter yesterday.  In the course of business I met a relative of the man who murdered Mussolini.  He took great pleasure in describing how his relative had been a Partisan working for the British State.  He had been part of a gang of terrorists who captured Mussolini as he tried to leave Italy, and had personally murdered him in a manner comparable with the recent brutal slaying of Moammar Qadaffi of Libya.

I was at a loss of what to say to this elderly Italian who bragged about an act of murder as if it was something to be proud of.  The man related how his family had been in Britain from the early part of the last century, and had volunteered to fight their kin back in Italy.  To hear a man speak in romantic tones of treachery, fratricide, and the Zionisation of Europe was an odd experience.

Benito Mussolini was murdered in cold blood by terrorists fighting for the Zionist Internationale, or as it is frequently called, the New World Order.  Mussolini's crime was to overturn the economic domination of the usurers, and to root-out the Freemasonic agents of the international money power.  At no time did he set up concentration camps for Jews, yet still he has been labelled as a key figure in the fabled holyhoax.  The economic ideals of Mussolini greatly benefited Italy.  He was a European Nationalist, but a fervent Italian patriot, with no thought of global domination - unlike those who fought against him, and are even now building a single Global Slave State.

Mussolini is still beloved of many of the Italian people, and has a mausoleum to his memory in Predappio.  Meeting an Italian in England who is happy to revel in acts which have contributed to the demise of not only Italy, and England, but in fact all of the European world, is sadly appropriate for the country which celebrates the enemies of humanity, and persecutes those who fight for the truth.  I wonder if he would be so outspoken if he was in the company of good, proud Italians?

There are many internationalists who are happy to betray their countries and nations, but the number of anti-internationalists is growing at a rate which should not be underestimated.  Our enemies have no morality and no humanity, and for this reason their cruelty and materialism will not prevail.  Incidentally, the defamer of Italy was invited to attend a commemoration in the Netherlands of the Partisan murderer - due to the Partisan meeting natural justice in the Netherlands not long after murdering one of Europe's loyal sons.  There will be no mausoleum for the murderer, and his name will not be remembered.  The enemies of Europe may be crowing now, but their lies are losing their hypnotic power, and the actions of the likes of NATO will not be tolerated much longer.  The free world is awakening, and forbidden truths are being spoken.

Benito Mussolini - Requiescat in Pace

Traffic congestion is an internationalist disease

In England, a vast network of motorways links just about every part of the country.  As the network has grown, so has the volume of traffic using it.  As a result, the number of motorways and the length and width of those in existence, continues to increase.  Congestion has reached the point that a journey which should take no more than half an hour, can often take more than two hours to complete.  As the number of commuters increases, so the congestion worsens, and no matter how much of of the formerly green and pleasant land succumbs to the ever growing blanket of concrete and tarmac, as long as commuting continues, so will the problems associated with it.

Our beloved government in their infinite wisdom have a solution for those who have to endure long travels to far away towns: they keep increasing the cost of diesel and petrol in order to make travel by car so economically devastating that people will stop using their cars and turn to public transport.  To the likes of Communist Party, sorry Green Party Member of Parliament, Caroline Lucas, the idea of armies of producer-consumers trudging across the country to perform menial tasks which a barely trained monkey could do, is fine; so long as they endure the soul destroying and expensive cattle transport, which they themselves do not have to use.  They after all, are more equal than us.

To the internationalists who sit in Parliament getting fat whilst we struggle to survive, the first and foremost priority is to keep the current economic system going; to keep the real rulers of the country in power and to ensure that nothing threatens their ill-gotten wealth.  This obsession was seen in its extreme form with the invasion of Libya to benefit the environmental terrorists of BP who lost money in the Gulf of Mexico, but have since made a fortune from the corpse of Libya.  The materialistic mindset applies to the home country just as much as to foreign lands, and make no mistake, they would happily slaughter us if they felt it to their economic advantage.

Whether it is the Green Party's demand that cars be effectively abolished for the proletariat through outrageous taxation, or it is the Con-Dem and Labour policy of building over every inch of soil to keep the traffic flowing, all the Establishment parties are in agreement that the commuter society must be maintained for the good of the economy (meaning of course the Establishment who own it).  As internationalists they cannot see the real solution to the commuter problem; to abolish commuting!

A real environmentalist party would seek to abolish commuting to preserve the land, but the UK Green Party is content to push the man-made global warming myth and to destroy the landscape with wind turbines which use more electricity than they produce, and kill birds in the process.  The heirs of the great Walter Darré, they are not!  The Green party, and all the other Establishment-serving vermin in Westminster, refuse to accept that the land is sacred and that the number of people who dwell on it matters.  Yes, it is true that there is physically enough space for the entire population of the world to live in this country; but only at the cost of people living in concrete jungles which destroy the basic essence of humanity.  Of course, the rulers do not live in the urban sewers they create for the rest of us.

A very simple solution to the commuter problem, is to tax employers who do not employ people living locally.  It is insane that people form one town should have to travel to another to work; passing convoys of people doing likewise in the opposite direction.  Rather than building more roads and further scarring the land, does it not make sense to financially disincentivise the employment by companies of people from outside the local area?  Of course this is heresy to internationalists who oppose any measures which bolster the people in their native lands.

The government in Westminster often talk about needing more people to come to our unemployment ridden land.  This is nonsense.  If the millions of unwanted guests were to return home, there would be work for us all.  If international corporations were excluded and policies enacted to protect local communities, then there would be enough land for all of us to be self sufficient; making work a pursuit to achieve the commodities and luxuries of our choice, rather than a form of slavery to ensure a meagre existence of mere survival.

Remember the hypocrisy of the fake environmentalists and the materialistic politicians.  Their solutions are solutions to keep us enslaved to the real rulers who they serve.