Multi-Cultist Anti-Indigenous Internationalist Propaganda and the Walsall Mosque False Flag bomb

Walsall is an average sized town in Warwickshire, near to the city of Birmingham.  Outside the local area not much is known about Walsall other than that the locals pronounce the name of the town in a way which to the rest of the English sounds very much like 'warsaw', as in the capital of Poland.  Walsall has now become the focus of attention due to the apparent attempt to bomb a mosque in the town.  Unlike the recent stabbing of four people in a mosque in Birmingham, the Walsall incident has been categorised by the liberal extremist UK police as a 'hate crime'.  Why?  Because the man who stabbed four men in Birmingham was himself a coloniser, by the logic of the Cultural Marxists who misrule our country, his attack against fellow colonisers wasn't motivated by hatred!  

In the unhappy land which is the UK, for a crime to be politically motivated, the victims must be foreign, and the culprits indigenous.  This is how 'political correctness' works, and how the everyday hatred of the colonisers is ignored, whilst every murmur of dissent by the indigenous people is made to appear an unspeakable evil.

The Walsall Bomb is pure propaganda of the most juvenile variety.  According to the controlled media and the self-hating Islamophiles, just because a group of colonisers says that they were the target of  a bomb attack, it must be true.  The story is ludicrous.  If indigenous people wished to attack Muslims, they would do so by smashing up the shops they control, or by fighting them.  It is not in the English character to sneak around planting bombs; well, perhaps it is for the unwashed Marxists who live amongst us, but not for decent English folk.  As anyone who lives near a mosque knows, the places are constructed in the manner of army barracks.  Even if one wished to attack them, there is no point in doing so, as any damage would be confined to the exterior, and buildings can easily be patched up with no harm done to the occupants.  

According to the færytale of the police, Muslims found the 'suspicious package' and reported it to the police, who then destroyed it in a controlled manner.  It doesn't take the skills of Sherlock Holmes to work out that the 'home-made bomb' was made solely to generate sympathy for the Muslims and to dæmonise all who which to see an end to the occupation of our lands.  One can guarantee that should the bomb maker turn out out be a Pakistani or one of the self-hating enemies of humanity such as a UAF member, the media will simply move on from this story onto another piece of anti-indigenous propaganda, and quietly bury any information which would embarrass the colonisers or the storm troopers of 'political correctness'.

The Walsall lie story comes at the same time as the media concentration on the police operation to spy on the family of multi-cultist martyr, Stephen Lawrence. Typically ignoring the truth about St Ephen Lawrence(!) - a drug-dealing Black Supremacist racist bigot involved with violent criminals - the media is yet again painting all indigenous people as 'haters' and all colonisers as victims.  When one puts the Lawrence hysteria together with the Walsall drivel, it is obvious that what we are witnessing is another coordinated campaign to silence criticism of the actions of the colonisers.  Anyone who speaks out in defence of the indigenous population and our right to have our own country, can now not only be linked to the murder of a teenager who has become a saint in the eyes of the media, but also to 'terrorism'. This is how Free Speech becomes a Thought Crime.

Stephen Lawrence is dead, and murder is wrong no matter who carries it out, or who is the victim. However, the media  have used his death for political purposes.  Just as all politicians must make a pilgrimage to the Holocaustian Mecca of Yad Vashem, to there prostrate themselves at the altar of the self-Chosen, so Lawrence has become another figure who must be referred to in sombre worshipful tones.  The treacherous viper, David Cameron, who is even now using tax-payers' money to finance terrorists in Syria who are murdering ordinary people in increasingly barbaric ways, has made a point of calling upon the name of Lawrence to shew his 'anti-racist' (anti-indigenous) credentials. Not a word is ever spoken of the vast number of indigenous people murdered by colonisers.  Some people truly are more equal than others.

The Lawrence fable is being interwoven with a new fiction about Muslims being under attack in the UK.  The purpose of this is to silence those who dare to oppose internationalism and the genocide of indigenous Europe. We are constantly told that immigrants must be allowed to stay in our country if they are in danger at home.  This even covers those who would quite rightly be executed in their own countries for raping children!  If Muslims are indeed in danger if they remain in Europe, then surely for their own safety they must be moved to safer lands; Muslim lands.  Of course, Muslims are not under attack in the UK and even if they were, the government would most likely send in the army to defend them, even if this meant them murdering their own kin to do so.

The media and the enemy police are liars.  This current wave of anti-indigenous hatred has not come about by chance.  The great enemy of humanity and murderer of Whites and Blacks alike, Nelson Mandela, is at deaths door.  This foul creature who destroyed the lives of thousands is a hero of the Liberal-Marxist State.  What better way to prepare for the lies which will elevate this beast to the status of a multi-cultist demigod than to create a fable of poor innocent ethnic minorities being persecuted by hate-filled indigenous folk?!  Lies built on lies is how the UK Establishment works.  Lawrence-Walsall-Mandela-Syria; the web of deceit is there for all with eyes to see.  Once the living corpse of Mandela relinquishes the diabolical entity within, all manner of apartheid fictions will be brought into the public domain by the controlled media; these will be used against Assad of Syria, (not the illegal bandit state of Israel) to justify further support of the terrorists on the ground.  The Walsall incident is a part of this propaganda web.  

Dæmonising the resistance not only herds the sheeple into supporting their own genocide via multiculturalism, it justifies the destruction of all nations which stand opposed to internationalism, and it gives power to the architects of the Police State.   What is under way now is a multi-faceted attack on freedom.  The only solution is to stand fast in defiance of the enemy, and to push back hard against their lies.  Our struggle gets harder by the day as every avenue of dissent is criminalised; but as the lies of the enemy become easier to expose, and the oppression harder to ignore, the potential to awaken our kin increases.  The enemy may well be overstretching itself.  We must use ever opportunity to help them dig their own graves; and to ensure their putrid system is brought collapsing down around them. 

The UK is a Pædophile State; enforced by a nonce's legal system

The UK is controlled by pædophiles who despise the people they rule over.  For anyone who cares to take notice of the behaviour of the Establishment towards children, this is self evident.  The school system is designed to sexualise children; the media - especially the 'pop' music industry - takes every opportunity to promote sex to children at ever younger ages; fashion teaches girls to dress as prostitutes; the legal system then throws a few degenerates into prison, but largely ensures that those who destroy the lives of children are treated with extreme leniency.

The Jimmy Savile scandal which finally broke into the public arena recently was a white wash to draw attention away from the pædophiles in the fraudulent puppet government and the real Establishment which controls the country.  A handful of 'celebrities' were thrust into the spotlight in order to take attention away from the people who hold power over us; the people who rape us economically every day, and who have amongst them literal rapists who prey on children and those who cannot defend themselves.

'West' Yorkshire Police (those who brutalise the central part of the dismembered West Riding - the fictitious non-county and insult to our heritage which the enemy call West Yorkshire) is a police force which has come under a limited degree of scrutiny due to Jimmy Savile living in Leeds.  The Establishment's most well-known procurer of children for sexual abuse, Savile had a very cosy relationship with the police, having weekly parties for the bootboys of the State.  The police have made the ludicrous statement that they did not know that Savile was a pædophile, and that he was in no way shielded by them.  Considering that the police themselves were amongst his customers, it is more likely that some of those who visited his Roundhay home were themselves child abusers, and that they kept him safe in return for access to children.  Since Savile is dead and the police are well-known for looking after their own, it is highly unlikely that we will ever know just what disgusting deals were done with Savile.  The neighbouring North Yorkshire police are just as bad - indeed it is hard to find any police in the UK who are not total scum.

Is it unfair to accuse the men and women of the law of wrong-doings?  Not at all.  In a district of the metropolitan area of the West Riding, there is a woman who is living on welfare benefits, but always has designer clothes, and drives a very expensive car.  She has a daughter who dresses in clothes which would suit a red light district, but are not appropriate for a primary school child.  The woman is a prostitute.  She has a constant flow of customers to her home, mostly Pakistani men, but also a good number of White skinheads.  Everyone knows that she is a whore and that she is prostituting her daughter, but the police will do nothing about this.  Why?  Could it be because her father is a serving police officer, and that the skinheads who visit are his colleagues?  The rot in the police is astounding, but then considering that they are the militia of the Establishment, not surprising.

In the UK, there is a legal requirement for convicted pædophiles and rapists to be registered as such, in order to protect children from them.  Such is the level of decadence in the UK, that pædophiles can have their names removed from the Sex Offenders' Register simply be stating that they won't abuse children again!  If they go on to ruin more children's lives - which most do - then that is just too bad!  The whole point of the Sex Offenders' Register is to deter pædophiles from attacking the young by scaring them with the reality that should they do so, they will be publicly named and be prevented from ever having access to those they prey on.  In the Culturally Marxist mess which is the UK, this is against the human rights of the perverts, and to hell with the rights of children to not be molested.  Who decides who should be removed from the Sex Offenders' Register?  Why are old friends, the police - and not even high level ones!

The politically correct shock troops of the Establishment proved absolutely useless in stopping Savile destroying children over several decades, but they are ruthlessly efficient in ensuring pædophiles and rapists are allowed to hide their atrocities from the public.  In my own area, there is a pædophile who routinely goes to a public park full of children.  The police  have installed CCTV on his house and have regular patrols due to his presence.  These are not to ensure that our children are safe from this monster, but to ensure that he does not meet with an accident which would end his perversion forever.  Our children are not safe to play in their own streets and parks, but the pædophile is well protected.

It is not only the police who protect those who should by rights be executed for their crimes, the legal system in its entirety is geared up to look after them.  Barrister Barbara Hewson publicly stated that the media should not be drawing attention to pædophiles, even in the limited way which ignores the scum in charge of the country.  She stated that the legal age of consent should be dropped from 16 to 13, thus allowing for degenerates to gain access to younger victims.  As is the practice with the age of consent as it stands, the legal cut off point at which sex with a minor becomes a criminal offence, is not rigorously enforced, thus making children under 16 vulnerable to predators.  To drop the age of consent to 13 would realistically lower the enforced age to pre-teen levels.  The sickening Barbara Hewson labelled teenage girls as whores and the men who prey on them as victims.  She commented:

"Some girls more mature more quickly than others, and some teenage girls are anything but wallflowers...The UK has the one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancy in Europe, and most underage sexual activity is with other teens. As the recent Asian procuring cases such as those in Rochdale show, the existing age of consent doesn’t appear to deter really nasty predatory behavior, though such extreme cases are atypical."

Hewsons mentality is not untypical of those in the legal system.  She does not question why children feel they must have sex at ever younger ages, not for a moment considering the negative impact of the fashion industry, television and above all pop music, which teaches children that promiscuity is a sign of maturity, and that celibacy is old-fashioned and uncool.  She does not consider that the promotion of sex in sex education classes is of the 'monkey see monkey do' category, and that the constant promotion of 'experimenting' with same sex relationships, miscegenation and all other politically correct dogma only exacerbates this.  Rather than suggesting the age of consent be lowered, the responsible attitude is to demand it be raised back to 21, and that those who offend be punished with the full force of the law, up to and including with the death penalty.  The wishy-washy libertine attitude of Hewson is indicative of the degeneracy of the UK legal system as a whole.

The laissez-faire attitude of Barrister Hewson is far from isolated.  Lord Lane, the Lord Chief Justice and second highest judge in the land reduced the prison sentence of a convicted pædophile to just six months.  The pervert in question, Oliver Brooke, former head of pædiatrics at St George's Hospital, Tooting, London, had used his position to procure pictures of young children, which he then circulated amongst fellow pædophiles.  Each photograph was the result of a child being abused, and each was proof of an atrocity against an innocent.  Lord Lane stated that:

'It is not inappropriate, perhaps, in view of the puerility of this type of behaviour, to compare it rather to a schoolboy collecting cigarette cards in olden times, because the duplicates were handed on to other adults, three of four of them only, who were likewise minded to indulge in this sort of puerility. To that extent the distribution was by no means of the most vicious sort...It is perfectly plain from those, (the testimonials read out about Brooke) that we are dealing here with someone who, apart from these offences, was an unusually fine man.'

To the second highest judge in the UK, the procuring, duplication and distribution of child pornography is comparable with the collection of cigarette cards, and the man brought before him is a perfect gentleman (apart from his proclivity for sexually desiring children!)  This was not a recent case, which shews that the arrogance of those who consider themselves better than the rest of us, and thus having some God-given right to tell us how to think and act, is far from new.

This week the artist, Graham Ovenden, was found guilty of child abuse by Plymouth Crown Court.  Commenting that the artist had suffered a blow top his reputation, the judge in Plymouth gave Ovenden a suspended sentence, meaning that he has not been punished at all.  Clearly the abuse of children doesn't matter to those in high places.

It is not solely young girls who are preyed upon by the scum in this country.  Men and boys are equally endangered by the corrupt and degenerate misrulers of the UK.  The Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, Nigel Evans, has been implicated in the rape of men.  He is still a serving Member of Parliament, still taking his wage from the taxpayer, and still at liberty.  The accusation of rape is clearly not of great importance in Westminster. 

The homosexual rights advocate Peter Tatchell was lambasted for suggesting that the age of consent be lowered to 14.  However, to take the time to read what he actually suggested rather than to take a reactionary position based on hearsay, Tatchell argued for an end to the prosecution of 14 to 16 year olds who have sex with people of a similar age group, differing by no more than three years and not falling under the age of 14.  Children should not be having sex at 14, and those who wield influence such as Peter Tatchell, should use their influence to discourage it.  However, Tatchell's argument is far more acceptable than that of Barbara Hewson who has no problem with old men having sex with 13 year olds; it is far more acceptable than Lord Lane's view that child pornography is just a hobby and is harmless; it is far more acceptable than the attitude of the police in letting people who have been convicted of child abuse have their names removed from the Sex Offenders' Register and continue to pursue children.  It is a strange world we live in when Peter Tatchell can be considered as the voice of reason and moderation!

The UK is an occupied nation, ruled over by people who have no right to hold any positions of authority in our lands.  The systematic abuse of children in the 'care' system is well known, and continues.  Children are bombarded with pornography by the media, the school system, and every other area under the control of the Establishment; they are made to feel that they must be sexually active, and preferably to be so in a multicultural and multisexual manner.  

The UK is the only country in Europe in which the State can legally kidnap children, taking them from their families and putting them into the Care system.  The children kidnapped in the UK can be taken from parents without any reason to justify such an outrage.  Over 1,000 children are removed from their families every month in the UK, with a tiny number forcibly adopted and permanently cut off from their parents, whilst the majority are handed over to Social Services, which - as the North Wales care homes abuse scandal clearly shewed - is  rife with pædophiles.  Jimmy Savile may be the most infamous pædophile in the UK, but compared to the State procurement of children which is legally carried out through the secret Family Courts, his deeds pale into insignificance - not of course regarding the damage to the individuals involved, but in terms of the numbers of victims.

The UK is a sick land, ruled over by degenerates who are evil, pure and simple.  There can be no reforming our enemies; no rehabilitation of those who destroy our young.  They must be rooted out and destroyed - to the last man and woman who has been involved in the abuse of children (whether directly or through the media, education etc), or has protected them through the legal system.  Wearing a police uniform or a judge's ridiculous wig is no defence and will in no way keep these despicable beasts free from natural justice when it catches up with them - which it will.

Woolwich aftermath: Increased support to terrorists in Syria; More funding for Police State; Total crackdown on Freedom

As the dust settles following the State-ordained Woolwich incident, the reasons for this Zionist psychological operation are becoming ever clearer.  The enemies of freedom needed an excuse to crush opposition to their evil plans, and when one did not present itself, the highly-publicised Woolwich event was created.

There are those who argue that the man alleged to have been decapitated is still alive, and that Lee Rigby was just another actor.  This is possible, but considering that the enemies of humanity were quite happy to murder thousands in New York City on the 11th September 2001, the idea that they would baulk at killing one soldier in order to further their aims, does seem like wishful thinking.  They have sent thousands of soldiers to their deaths since 11.9.01, so one more would make no difference to them.

The Marxist scourge which dares to call itself the democratically-elected government of the UK, is constantly lying to us about the need for 'austerity' in order to pay off the UK's debts.  This is absolute nonsense.  All that is needed to take the UK out of debt is to rid the country of the usurious banking system, and to remove all power from the likes of the Rothschilds.  There is no reason why money should be borrowed from the banks as debt and not simply issued as credit by the State; no reason other than the fact that the UK Establishment is wholly owned by the Rothschilds (or otherwise collaborating with them) and that the debt system redistributes power and wealth away from the people and to these anti-humans.   A debt-free economy is not ideological dreaming, but a historical fact.  For information on how this was achieved with great success - until the Rothschilds used their puppets in the UK to destroy it - look into the Guernsey Monetary Experiment (linked at http://www.michaeljournal.org/guernsey.htm).

The lying traitors in the government have used their contrived event to demand that no money is taken from the aspects of government dedicated to gathering information on the ordinary people in the country; ironically referred to as 'counter'-terrorism, but rightly just terrorism.  Yes, the State has declared that the National Health Service, Pensions, Welfare, and everything of use to the people, must be cut back and/or transferred into the hands of private profit-making corporations in order to give even more money to the banksters who treat us as if they owned us, but not one penny can be cut from government initiatives which undermine the freedom of the people.

One must wonder why the Establishment has such faith in its data gathering processes, when - just as with 7/7 - the CCTV in London (the most monitored city in the world) failed to capture the terrorists at work!  One would also wonder why the Establishment has no faith in the NHS, considering that one of the alleged killers, shot no less than EIGHT times (!) is already out of hospital.  One cannot but marvel at this medical miracle!

The Woolwich incident has been used to strengthen the Police State and to justify the removal of all internet and telephonic privacy - and of course, an extension in CCTV coverage, in the vain hope that it may one day actually catch real terrorists at work!!

Tellingly, the MI5-controlled actor, Michael Adeboloja, included in his statement regarding the killing of a British soldier, the following:

"I apologise that women have had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe...Remove your government, they don't care about you."

The inclusion of these words clearly is designed to prepare for a shift in attitude amongst the media-numbed masses, to accept that those who speak out against the crimes of the UK government in countries overseas, must be 'terrorists', or terrorist-sympathisers.  By doing this, the War Criminal and adulterous closet sodomite, William Hague, can continue to order the murder of Syrians for the benefit of his financial owners, safe in the knowledge that the media will attack those who oppose his outrageous agenda.

Who can disagree that the government must be removed?  Who can disagree that the UK is directly behind the murder of civilians and those in the employ of the legitimate authority in Syria?  Who can disagree that the terrorist atrocities in Palestine, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Sudan, Somalia, Northern Ireland, etc etc, have been orchestrated by the scum in London and their partners in crime in Tel Aviv, Bruxelles and Washington DC?  The evidence is plain for all who are willing to see.  Likewise the terrorist atrocities of 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Moscow, Bali etc etc all bear the hallmarks of MI5/6, the MOSSAD, CIA etc.

The purpose of the Woolwich incident is to justify policing the internet and closing down all sites which expose the liars and murderers who feign to be fighting against terrorism, but in reality are the architects of terror.  

The Rothschild poodle, David Cameron, has announced the creation of the Tackling Extremism and Radicalisation Task Force (TERFOR) which will monitor all political and religious discourse.  In tandem with this, Google has agreed to provide the UK government with information about videos on youtube, posts on blogger, and everything else which falls into the vast Google remit.  Under the guise of fighting terrorism, the UK government is giving itself the power to control all internet debate and to police all dissent across the UK.  Muslims may be the media focal point, but it is everyone who in any way opposes the internationalist corporate despotism of the Establishment who will be targeted  The renewed drive to implement the Communications Data Bill which will destroy all privacy, is but a part of this move to absolute censorship.

The speed at which the anti-humans have moved, and the ridiculous lack of any private video footage supporting the official version of Woolwich (of which there should be vast amounts considering the omnipresence of mobile 'phones with cameras in all parts of the UK), points to this being a long-prepared False Flag, with the agenda of bringing in an era of surveillance which would have made Joseph Stalin blush.

As if to emphasise the untouchability of the State, following the fake terrorist events in Woolwich and Paris, and ignoring destruction of Sweden by rioting immigrants including any who have been actively fighting against the legitimate government of Bashar Al Assad, the politburo in Bruxelles has cleared the way for the terrorist scum in Syria to be openly armed by EU governments, in order to force a Rothschild Central Bank on Damascus, and destroy one of the last remaining free nations in the world today.  The terrorist FSA routinely beheads Syrian citizens and soldiers, in much the way as the media propagandists would have us believe occurred in Woolwich.  To point out this hypocrisy is to acknowledge the truth in the Adeboloja statement - and thus to become identified as a 'terrorist'.

This operation has been skilfully conducted, and worse is yet to come.  Expect activists to be persecuted as enemies of the State (which of course we are), and by media lies as enemies of the people (which we are not).  These are dark days.  Now more than ever the truth must be shouted and people must be made to hear.  Now is not the time for timidity or for giving any ground to the enemy.

UK police swoop on angry Britons, as Marxist traitors organise PRO-Coloniser demo! Oy Vey.

Has the UK lost the plot?  In the aftermath of the orchestrated public execution of a British soldier, the filth have been mobilised to arrest anyone who dares to blaspheme the name of Islam!  One would be forgiven for thinking the UK was already an Islamic nation, and not one suffering under forced immigration.

Amongst those arrested by the enemies of humanity known as the police, is an 85-year old woman from Kent who spoke loudly outside a mosque, in tones less than favourable towards the Colonisers.  Yes, an octogenarian has been arrested for speaking her mind.  This is in  a country which has the gall to preach about being the mother of democracy, and the bastion of freedom!  

Alongside the lunacy of the police, the organised Marxist rabble of the UAF (Un-naturals Against Freedom) have organised a public demonstration of solidarity with all Colonisers against the indigenous population.  The police will be out in force to ensure the democratic right of the organised enemy of humanity to voice such absurdities is upheld; excepting of course the police who will be on hand to arrest anyone voicing dissent with the dogma of Cultural Marxism.

As Alfie@Freddie1927 quite rightly stated, the Woolwich incident is a psychological operation to make the British people scared of the Islamic Colonisers, who we know by experience to be cowardly opportunists who only attack when they have the over-whelming numerical advantage.  We know that these people are deranged; obsessed with their non-existent 'god' and their Talmudically-contrived prophet, Mohammed.  We have tried to get on with them, but know there is no point.  No-one who knows Muslims is scared of them; disgusted by them and sick of their puerile drivel yes, but scared, no.

We need to ensure that we do not fall for the lies of the Establishment, or succumb to the threats of their thugs in uniform.  Say it loud and proud: This land is Our Land; Europe belongs to Us.  There is no room for Islam or for the Jews who created it.  To hell with the police and their scare tactics.

To the security police reading this; be aware, we are awake to your lies, and we will not tolerate your actions: your brutality; your persecution; your murders.  You can lie all you like, but we will not submit to your tyranny.  There will be a day of reckoning in which the enemies of this land will have to pay for what they have done.  You are siding yourselves with the enemy.  You need to realise the harm you are doing and desist immediately.  Should you continue your course of action, you only have yourselves to blame.  Arrest me; arrest all thought criminals; we are ready, and whatever you throw at us, behind us there are awakening legions, and you will pay for your treachery.

Woolwich Beheading: A False Flag to usher in Internet Policing?

The terrorist UK government has announced plans to rush through legislation destroying all internet privacy and allowing for the permanent storing of every email, skype conversation, internet search, web browse, blog posting etc.  According to the lying parasites in Westminster, the Communications Data Bill is the only safe-guard we have against 'terrorism' and had it been in place this week, the soldier murdered in Woolwich would still be alive.  This is absolute, complete and utter, bullshit.

Everyone who saw the 'news' reports of the beheading in Woolwich was rightly alarmed and horrified.  By day-to-day experience with the anti-indigenous attitudes of Muslims in the UK, no-one was really surprised that this could happen.  However, there is evidence rapidly building that the Woolwich murder may not have been what it appeared to be.

The beheading produced no blood.  The video of the man covered in blood appears to have been doctored.  There is the intriguing case of a woman teleporting into the video shewn on television, from thin air - indicating poor editing of footage ad a deliberate attempt to mislead us.  Direct link to video with anomalies indicating tampering: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDd9cwqoni8

All we can be certain of right now, is that just as with the 9/11 massacre in which the American people were tricked into giving up their Bill Of Rights, becoming serfs in their own lands, the Woolwich event is being used to destroy what little freedom we have left in our country.

For an excellent analysis of the contradiction in the official story of what happened in Woolwich, visit: http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/woolwich-incident.html

We were lied to about 9/11, 7/7, the Madrid and Bali bombings, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and many other incidents tied to the 'war on terror'.  It would be more surprising if this incident was true than if it followed the usual pattern of media lies and political manipulation.  It is worthy of note that the traitor-in-chief, David Cameron, sees no hypocrisy in condemning the Woolwich killers whilst demanding more arms be sent to the terrorists fighting against the sovereign nation of Syria; but then for such a consummate liar, speaking a series of contradictory fictions simultaneously is business as usual.

The articles which follow this one concern the nature of Islam in the UK, and regardless of whether the Woolwich beheading was indeed a False Flag, Islam is indeed a very real problem which can only be solved by the total removal of all Muslims from Europe.  Serbia shewed the reality of allowing mass immigration of outsiders, with the Albanian conquest of Kosovo.  Living in a colonised part of England, I can assure you that Islam is a danger and that it does need to be removed from our shores; but the reality or otherwise of the Woolwich affair has no bearing on the need to restore our land to our people.  Just as Palestine must be restored to her own people and the Khazars sent back to the Caucasus, Europe must be returned to Europeans; simply for the sole reason that it is right.  One doesn't have to be 'racist' (to hate others) to love one's own and to respect the right of everyone to live unmolested in his or her own land.

Of even more danger than the colonisers and their bizarre faiths is the presence of our greatest foes in power over us.  The Muslims may well be being scape-goated to cover for the crimes of our Zionist overlords.  Removing the symptom of  our ills without addressing the cause, would solve nothing.  Yes immigrants must be returned whence they came, but of equal - nay, greater importance - those who have hijacked our lands and presided over mass immigration as a means to destroy our mono-ethnic mono-cultural unity, must be removed root and branch.  The Edict of 1290 must be enforced, and every last Jew and Jew-sympathiser (Zionist) must be expelled.  

The terror in Woolwich may well be the terrifying of the people by lies to force us to give up our last vestiges of freedom - and even if Muslims have yet again been used as patsies, it is the Talmudic filth which orchestrated this.  Let the Zionists and their collaborators return to Chechnya and the other lands of the Khazar Empire - but with the exception of the likes of William Hague, David Cameron, Tony Blair, Elizabeth Windsor et al, who must be punished for their crimes in our lands, and only physically returned to the Khazaria once their foul lives have been extinguished.

 

Genius Plan of the Day

by Cheradenine Zakalwe (http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk)

 

"How do we stop young British Muslims falling into the hands of Jihadis?" asks Toby Young in his blog article with the comments turned off.

First, there's no such thing as a British Muslim, or a French Muslim or a German Muslim. Muslims belong to the Ummah. That is their nation. That is what the word Ummah means. Talking about a British Muslim is like talking about a French German or a Spanish Italian. It is a contradiction in terms.

Second, the way we stop Muslims resident in Britain from attacking us is by ensuring that that they are no longer resident in Britain. As always, the elephant in the room is immigration. Immigrants or people of recent immigrant origin continually plot to murder indigenous Europeans and every time it happens, the question of immigration is never raised. Why are we allowing people into our countries if there presence is not beneficial to us? And once it becomes obvious that their presence is not beneficial, why are we allowing them to remain?

It is time to publicly demand a stop to Muslim immigration and the repatriation or expulsion of the existing Muslim population. (See my plan for Muslim repatriation.) Note that these ideas are so taboo that no one of any prominence in the Counterjihad movement even dares to raise them. But these ideas are the only way this can end other than bloody war. However unpleasant they seem, they are less unpleasant than the alternative. They must gradually grow in acceptability until they come to be publicly supported by a majority of the people. But they cannot do that if no one, not even fringe bloggers, dares to express them.

Toby Young has a genius alternative answer to his own question, though. His plan? Send Muslims to special schools where they will receive military-style training instead. Perhaps we should lay on bomb-making courses at these military-style academies, just to help the Muslims learn discipline, you understand.

Mark Glenn: UK Beheading was a 'political statement'

by Andrew Anglin (totalfascism.com)

Your typical Muslim political activist.

In response to yesterday’s brutal beheading in England by a Muslim extremist, the Arab terrorist-apologist Mark Glen had this to say:

It was a POLITICAL STATEMENT in response to what the Brits have done to innocent muslims the world over, plain and simple.

Just let that sink in for a minute.  Hitting an innocent man with a car, getting out of the car and hacking his head of with a meat cleaver in from of dozens of witnesses is a political statement.  If not only murder, but the violent mutilation of a body in a public square is a form of political statement, surely everything else these Muslim invaders do to us must also come under this heading.

A few other recent political statements made by Muslim immigrants in White countries:

When Mohammed Sheikh, Hamza Ali and Suran Uddin kidnapped a 13-year-old British girl and drugged her and raped her for four days, that was a political statement.

When nine Muslims kidnapped, drugged, raped and forced into prostitution more than 40 girls under the age of 15 in England, that was a political statement.

When 20 Muslim men gang-raped an 11-year-old near a public pool in Sweden, that was a political statement.

When Yonatan Ogube and Samuel Rezene kidnapped a 14-year-old girl in Seattle, drugged her and forced her into prostitution by threatening to kill her and her family, that was a political statement.

When two Turkish men raped a 16-year-old German girl in a Worms parking lot, before cutting open her belly with a broken bottle, that was a political statement.

When as many as two-dozen Muslim men would gather around regularly to gang-rape two teenage girls who were threatened with death if they told in France, that was a political statement.

14-year-old Eva Helgetun was a victim of a Muslim political statement against the Iraq war. She committed suicide less than a month later.

When three Muslim men gang-raped 14-year-old Eva Helgetun in Norway, putting her through such trauma that she committed suicide a few weeks later, that was a political statement.

When three Muslims in Spain, one of which was seventy years old, gang-raped and robbed a vacationing British woman, that was a political statement.

When a Swedish mother of two was kidnapped by 12 Afghan immigrants – one of which had already been convicted of four rapes of Swedish women – and gang-raped for 7 straight hours, often with three men inside her at once, while the other men did drugs and laughed and called her a “whore,” and was put through so much psychological trauma that she is now in a mental hospital, so much trauma to her vagina and anus that she can not walk or control her bowel movements, that was a political statement.

And the Sydney Gang Rapes, committed by Mark Glenn’s tribesmen from Lebanon, were also no doubt a political statement.  Granted, that was way back in 2000, before any of these wars started, but it was, you know, against Australians helping Israel build gas chambers designed to kill 6 million Palestinians – or whatever.

There are, of course, so many hundreds of these political statements committed against women every year that I could not possibly list them all here.  Muslims are incredibly intense when it comes to politics.

One would assume the obvious solution to this problem would be to send all of these sickening filthy people back to wherever the hell they came from.  But no, Mark Glenn tells us – that is just what the Jews want us to do.  So, I guess we’ll need to think of another option – because we surely don’t want to do what the Jews want us to do.

Western Materialistic Propaganda exposed by Eastern Materialists

The film, 'Propaganda' from the website, http://propagandafilm.net/Propaganda/ is a film which everyone should take the time to watch.

It is perhaps one of the greatest ironies of our time that a film exposing materialism should come from a nation which adheres to the materialistic doctrine of Marxism!  North Korea - the Democratic People's Republic of Korea - is ideologically a blend of Leninism, Maoism, and Stalinism, with the addition of the elevation of the Leader of the country to the position of a living god.  However, before people in the UK laugh too hard at this absurdity, it should be noted that until recent times, the Windsor mafia and its fore-runners were believed to be higher beings than the rest of us.  Indeed to the simple-minded Royalists who continue to worship them, the Windsors are considered to have a 'divine right' to rule, due to being the direct descendants of a vicious and jealous god via his favourite Chosen creations.  The worship of the Leader is not very different from the worship of the Queen, and with the steady embedding of Marxism at every level of the UK, the similarities continue.

'Propaganda' exposes the lies of the media, and the disgusting Cult of Celebrity which has gripped the west. The obsession with material goods and with image is so entrenched in our besieged lands that it has become accepted as normal.  It is far from normal; it is a diseased mentality which is injurious to every one of us. 

The above film is not without its problems.  It is itself a work of propaganda, and even though it does a good job exposing many of the ills besetting the west, it does repeat many of the lies of the Zionist enemy.  Attacking nationalism, Propaganda follows the internationalist agenda; this is only to be expected of an avowedly Marxist state.  Whilst there are a number of concerns with the ideological direction of the film, the fact that it presents the reality of 9/11 as a State-orchestrated act of terror, and the fact that it opposes the ridiculous obsession with material wealth which has corrupted the west, makes the film worthy of praise.  Certainly the DPRK is not a state which most people would wish to live in; but it is only for the Koreans themselves to decide how they wish to live, not for outsiders to dictate.

I do not recommend this film due to any sympathy with the ideological position of the DPRK.  I recommend it solely because - however hypocritically - it does an excellent job of drawing attention to the manipulation of the people by government, and it can be used as a weapon in our own fight for freedom.  In our struggle, all tools at our disposal should be used.

Israel is the cause of all terrorism

I do not watch television.  Unfortunately on Wednesday, whilst waiting to see a midwife in the International Health Service which has replaced our NHS, I had no choice but to watch the lies of the government as they were aired live.

Alongside total piffle about 'saving the economy' by allowing the construction industry to concrete over every last blade of grass and acre of farm land (thus destroying any chance of self-sufficiency in food and making the colonised UK permanently reliant of the outside world to survive), the Prime Minister brought up the issue of Syria.  In a display of chutzpah which Binyamin Netanyahu would have been proud of, the lying Zionist, David ben-Cameron, declared that everything must be done to end the human suffering in Syria caused by terrorism. 

In his speech against the atrocities being committed in Syria, was the Zionist mouthpiece referring to bombardment of Damascus by Israel earlier this week?  Was he referring to the Al Qaeda formations in Syria who have murdered thousands of people in the streets?  Was he even referring to the SAS units which have been deployed to train the Al Nusra (Al Qaeda by another name) terrorists?  If so, then the despicable Cameron would be able to prevent many new terrorist outrages by simply withdrawing all UK military personnel from Syria, and immediately halting all tax-payer funding of the terrorist menace.  A strong condemnation of the bandit state of 'Israel' would be the very least one would expect from a Prime Minister opposed to terrorism.

So, what has Cameron done to alleviate the suffering of the Syrian nation?  He and his fellow War Criminal, William Hague, have committed the UK taxpayer to further funding of the Al Qaeda scum, making every tax-payer in the UK complicit in terrorism.  He has gone out of his way to excuse the parasite state of Israel, claiming that launching military strikes against a sovereign neighbour, using genuine Weapons of Mass Destruction, is an act of self defence (so long as it is Zionists doing the attacking).  The UK government has bent over backwards to increase the suffering of Syria, and to help the terrorists of Tel Aviv to expand into ever-more stolen territory to create the long dreamt of Greater Israel.

As if this was not evil enough, the UK has joined with its fellow Zionist vassal, the USA, in calling for a ground invasion to oust the legitimate government of Syria and impose one which will be subservient to the international corporations which are the lifeblood of Zionism.  The criminal cabal is already buying oil from the terrorists in areas they have seized by raping and murdering the local population into fleeing from.

Israel is the driving force behind the destruction of Syria, and the Zionist stooges in London, Washington DC and Ankara, are willing servants of this dæmonic entity.  There will be no justice in the world as long as the Zionists are free to ruin nations and abuse humanity.  It is time to cut the strings which hold the puppets in place, and to deal with those who commit murder in the only way which will guarantee they cannot re-offend.  Turning a blind-eye to tyranny only encourages these creatures and brings their atrocities another step closer to home.  Unless we wish to have our own nations treated in the way endured by Iraq, Libya, Syria, Serbia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Mali, etc etc, we have to stop the enemy in the places it hold power.  The battle for freedom begins in Zionist-occupied Europe (worldwide), USA and Turkey.  Doing nothing is unacceptable.

UKIP - United Kingdom Zionist Party

If anyone still holds onto a hope that the UK can be saved by voting for political parties, then the news that UKIP has fully embraced Zionism, should put an end to such day-dreaming.

For all his talk of fighting for an Independent UK, Nigel Farage and his band of followers, are just a different shade of the same Establishment problem.  Farage may do a stirling job of exposing the liars in Bruxelles, but when his own party is scrutinised, it too is home to the usual rag-bag of opportunists and traitors, which one would expect of any Establishment party.

UKIP claims to stand for a free and independent UK.  However, UKIP - whilst ceaselessly attacking the EU - is not really interested in making the UK a free nation.  UKIP is thoroughly transatlanticist; embracing ever closer union with the USA.  For those who believe that the USA is somehow more democratic and open than the EU, one only has to look at the recent Boston Marathon bombing, which was engineered to give the State an excuse to practice Martial Law and get a feel for how successful the 'war on terror' propaganda has been.  Of course, the US government is also responsible for the New York City massacre (11/9/01) amongst many, many, acts of terror against the people, which have been used to curtail freedom and excuse wars for economic conquest.  The EU is a nightmare; but the USA is hardly the 'land of the free' any more.

Farage is an avowed Zionist.  His so-called democratic party has restrictions on anyone from any nationalist organisation joining.  A party which even has the word 'independence' in its name, would seem logically to be nationalist in character, would it not?  Surely the whole point of exiting from the European Union is to achieve National Freedom?  Well, no; for the liars in UKIP, Independence from the EU, does not mean independence at all!  UKIP has no desire to break from the internationalist economy, or from the usurious banking system.  UKIP is home to buffoons who seriously believe that there can be freedom for any nation which embraces the anti-national 'free market economy'.  The sycophantic adoration of Farage for the nation-wrecking Thatcher, shews just where his loyalties lie; they lie firmly with the internationalist bankers and those who can afford to buy them - not the people he seeks to con with talk of 'independence'.

UKIP has made a point of distancing itself from a candidate for the Cornish town of Tintagel, Sue Bowen, for the 'crime' of having once been a member of the British National Party.  For UKIP, those who support an end to mass immigration, are beyond the pale.  How dare UKIP claim to be for an independent UK, if the insane internationalist programme of multi-culturalism is not to be overturned?  Even more telling, UKIP has suspended the Candidate for Crowborough (East Sussex), Anna-Marie Crampton, for posting comments on the internet which did not support the Holocaustian orthodoxy.  Not even Crampton's grovelling apologies, or her statement to having Jewish blood have been enough to save her from the ire of the UKIP leadership; making any statement which in anyway deviates from the Holocaustian faith, is blasphemy, and non-believers will not be tolerated.

The blasphemous allegedly comments made by Crampton include,

'The Second World Wide War was engineered by the Zionist jews and financed by the banksters to make the general public all over the world to feel so guilty and outraged by the Holocaust that a treaty would be signed to create the State of Israel as we know it today.'

and,

'The Rothschilds are Zionists..there is a difference between Jews and Zionists. These Psychopaths hide behind and use the Jews.  It was thanks to them that 6 million Jews were murdered in the War (along with 26 million Russians!)'

Can anyone truly deny that the international bankers are psychopaths, or that they do indeed hide behind the Jewish people in order to gain ever more power over us all?  Is it wrong that Israel was created as a result of the Holocaust propaganda?  The only thing wrong in the comments attributed to Crampton, is the 6 million figure, which any serious researcher knows to be a complete fallacy.

This is the sorry state of the so-called 'patriotic' movement in the UK.  Those who do not welcome mass immigration, the deliberate destruction of our indigenous culture, the destruction of our economy by international corporations and financiers, or any other aspect of internationalism, are hounded by the media and by the leadership of an organisation which gains votes by pretending to be in favour of national freedom. 

UKIP has shewn itself, once again, to be an Establishment safety valve, created to con the people into supporting an entity which serves the very power it purports to oppose.  National Freedom can only be achieved by achieving 'independence' from the international financial system, and restoring the homeland of every people to its indigenous folk; whether they are Europeans in Europe, Khazars in the Caucasus, Palestinians in the abomination known as Israel, or indeed any people in their native lands anywhere.   Of course, the sheeple will vote UKIP without thinking that Farage could be lying to them.  The ability of Farage (a Hebrew name, interestingly) and UKIP to hoodwink the people into accepting them as 'saviours' of the UK against the monster in the EU, proves that they have indeed joined the Establishment.  When will the people learn that repackaged excrement is no less foul for being presented in a shiny wrapper?

Further reading

The following link was sent in by Steed.  It provides more information on the safety valve party, UKIP  As it is becoming ever-more apparent that UKIP is set to take the place of Nick Gri££in's BNP as the focus for those who are awake to the dangers of mass immigration and loss of sovereignty, it is vital that we understand the nature of the party which has been presented as the vehicle for our salvation, but in fact is yet another Establishment trap..  Thanks to Steed for the link:

http://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/why-true-patriots-must-avoid-ukip.html

Syria cuts the arms of the beast; but its head remains.

It is not often that good news comes out of areas devastated by the Zionist war for total global control.  However, today, Damascus is a little safer with the victory of Syrian forces over the international terrorist rats which have been plaguing the nation for the past two years.

The news that the Zionist-sponsored terrorists have received some of the treatment they have been meting out to the people of Syria, is of course good news.  Every death of a footsoldier of Zion leaves the world a better place.  However, the fact remains that without dealing with the forces behind the terrorists, these victories against the rats on the ground - as praise-worthy as they are - can only at best pause the advance of the international enemy.

The terrorists in Syria are wholly controlled by the Talmudists in London, Washington DC and Tel Aviv.  Just like every other incarnation of the Al Qaeda group, regardless of the name they use, or the location they are deployed in, the terrorists in Syria are in the employ of the international Zionist menace.  They were used in Afghanistan to displace the legitimate Taliban government who had dared to stop the production of heroin which the enemies of humanity rely upon to weaken societies.  They were used in Serbia to create a base of operations for the Wahhabi vermin, to distribute heroin and extremism across Europe.  They were used in Libya to provide cover for the invasion of that nation in order to prevent the floating of a currency which would have freed the world from usurious bankers.  They have been used extensively in many nations to create misery and disunity; which the enemy has been able to use to its advantage.  In every case, the terrorist filth, regardless of their professed religious devotion, have been instrumental in extending the grip of power of the Elders of Jewry.  Wahhabism is not Islam; it is Talmudism for the Goyim, in much the same way as the perversion known as Judæo-Christianity.

The victories in Damascus are good news, but they are also a cause for concern.  The deaths of significant numbers of terrorists near Damascus will be distorted by the liars who control the Talmud Vision, to give the impression that Syrian forces have murdered sweet innocents, and that 'something must be done' to help them.  The enemies of humanity who form the Occupation Governments in the Zionised West, will use this as an excuse to steal even more money from the hard-pressed tax-payers they rule over, to provide more armaments and training for the terrorists.  It is possible that the Syrian successes may even be used to excuse an outright invasion of the troubled land; disguised, of course, as necessary for humanitarian reasons.  As long as the despots rule in the UK, USA and other occupied lands, no amount of success in Syria will halt the terrorists and their proxies.

So, what can be done?  William Hague, and his counterparts (including Tony Blair), must be tried as War Criminals, and judicially executed, as mass murderers.  Of course, considering that they are agents of the Establishment, they stand very little chance of being arrested.  It could be argued that eliminating puppets of the Establishment achieves nothing; however, it would send a clear message to other would-be collaborators, that betraying one's own nation, and murdering people across the globe for the benefit of international finance and the multinational corporations, will not be tolerated.  

We are being stripped of our rights on a daily basis, but we are still not completely enslaved.  We have the right to detain criminals, and we have the duty to do so - especially with regards to crimes against humanity.  Is it likely that we could get close enough to the filth who infest public office?  Not very.  However, we can disrupt their public engagements, and disseminate information to expose their criminality - and in the case of the closet homosexual (and 'friend' of child-procurer, Jimmy Savile) William Hague, to destroy their political careers.  Whatever we do, we must do something.  Our kinsfolk in Serbia were slaughtered by the scum who claim to represent us.  The peoples of Africa and Asia who have been bombed by NATO and Al Qaeda, are experiencing now, what our enemies will do to us, should we fail to stop them.  Whatever it takes, we have to stand in unity with Syria, and all who are under attack by the common enemy.  To do and say nothing, is to give silent approval, and to be accomplices in the destruction of the free world.

Margaret Thatcher is dead - and not before time

Today, the evil spirit which occupied the living corpse of Margaret Thatcher, has finally returned to the diabolical realm from whence it came. At the age of 87, Thatcher has proven the truth of the adage that 'the good die young'.  Thatcher was evil through-and-through, and did more to destroy the UK than any other politician, including even the horrendous rabble who infest parliament at present.

In 1979, Thatcher promised the beleaguered people of the UK, that if they voted for her party, she would reverse the flow of non-European immigration which had led to mass unemployment and social disintegration across the land.  In the General Election of 1979, the feelings of the indigenous population were evident in the mass support for the anti-immigrant National Front; a party which at the time was a serious movement in the UK, and far removed from the sad band of reactionaries which cling to its name today.  By aping the NF's policies on immigration, Thatcher won a major victory.  Instead of enacting repatriation of non-Europeans as promised, her government increased immigration levels, and added to the 'Race Relations' legislation of previous treacherous regimes.  Not only did Thatcher lie to the people; she went on to outlaw expressions of thought which she had used to get elected!  The death of the UK's cities began with Thatcher's betrayal of those who fell for her electoral lies about immigration reform.

Thatcher was the Prime Minister throughout the 1980s.  During that decade she lied to the people about the need to 'privatise' sections of the economy which were held in public ownership.  The partly-socialised economy of the UK was torn apart under Thatcher.  She promised the people that given over to private ownership, everything under State control would become more efficient, and thus cheaper to the consumer.  To this end, she sold off (amongst others:

• Steel-manufacturing
• Coal-mining
• Ship-building
• Car-production
• Essential utilities (Water, Gas, Electric)
• Telecommunication
• Public Transport (by, Air, Rail, Road and Sea)

Far from making that which had previously been socialised, more efficient and cost-effective, privatisation destroyed the infrastructure of the country and created economic misery for millions.   The UK no longer has a Car-production industry, nor - which for the largest island in Europe, is truly outrageous - has it a Ship-building industry.  The Steel industry was destroyed, as was Coal-mining - leaving a country which was built on industry at the mercy of foreign imports.  What remains of our once vast industrial base is pitiful.  We were told that the cost of Water, Gas, Electric and the Telephone, would drop once these utilities were 'freed' from the shackles of the State.  As everyone who now struggles to afford the basic necessities of life in the UK can attest to, privatisation saw prices rise astronomically.  Our Public Transport network used to be reliable and cheap; now it is an inefficient joke, governed only by the need to make ever more profits.  Everything which was privatised now costs much, much more than it ever did under the socialised ecenomy.  The lying thief, Thatcher, promised that taxes would fall, once the nationalised economy was privatised; they have risen beyond anyone's greatest fears - even though we now own nothing!

Thatcher was unpopular early on in her premiership.  The country was awakening to her lies, and it did appear that she would be voted out of office.  Her solution to this danger was the Falklands War.  British and Argentinian men died so that Thatcher could be reinvented as the 'saviour' of the UK.  The Sun published the infamous 'Gotcha' edition celebrating the sinking of a retreating Argentinian ship; for this, it was to be rewarded in the crushing of the media unions, which was to occur not long after.

Not only did Thatcher bathe in the blood of the military, she destroyed the working man.  Passing legislation abolishing the rights of working men to join together in effective Unions, she handed over total power to unscrupulous usurious tyrants, to the detriment of those who relied on them for work.  In order to prevent the media criticising her anti-social policies, she destroyed the hub of the media - Wapping - and handed over control of the press to her Zionist allies, Rupert Murdoch and Robert Maxwell.  What was left of a free press in the UK, was butchered under Thatcher.

Presenting herself as an 'iron lady' who would fight for the rights of the UK, Thatcher signed the UK into ever closer union with developing centralist state of Europe.  She was vocal in her opposition to Europe, but only for the benefit of fooling the people into believing she was a patriot.  Her actions were a series of betrayals of sovereignty, no matter what her words to the contrary.  Thatcher was an avowed trans-atlanticist, who never missed an opportunity to sell out British interests to corporations in the USA.  For all her flag-waving, Thatcher was an internationalist to the very core.

Thatcher flooded the UK with an army of immigrants.  She sold off everything we owned to international corporations.  She wrecked the social cohesion of the nation, creating a selfish mass of ego-maniacal individualists without any thought other than for their own financial gain.  Her housing policies encouraged people to buy their own homes, only to have the banks foreclose (at great profit), thus creating mass homelessness.

Thatcher introduced the Poll Tax which is still in existence today, albeit by a different name.  This tax further redistributed wealth away from the people, to the Establishment and the super-rich.  The recent abolition of the 50% tax rate for the super-rich, in tandem with the 'austerity' measures for the rest of us, is but a continuation of this agenda.

Thatcher was a militarist who gave over the nation's defence to her Talmudic friends in the USA.  When the people spoke against spending our money on nuclear arms, she had her police thugs brutalise them, and her puppet media defame them.  She brutalised Animal Rights activists, anti-internationalists, Peace activists, and everyone else who spoke out against her inhuman agenda.  She was a truly wicked individual who brought unspeakable misery to the UK - then and now.

Nigel Farage of the Atlanticist UKIP has made the statement, that:

"Whether you loved her or hated her nobody could deny that she was a great patriot, who believed passionately in this country and her people."

This should ring alarm bells with anyone who trusts the outspoken opponent of Bruxelles, and sycophantic worshipper of Washington DC.  Thatcher was no patriot; she was a willing servant of international finance

Thatcher presided over the most active pædophilia the UK has ever known.  She was a personal friend of Jimmy Savile, who procured children for herself and her colleagues to abuse.  Under her rule, Social Services became a vehicle for child-snatching, which has destroyed the lives of a staggering number of people.  Those who govern at the moment are heirs to her degenerate rule, and many of them too are pædophiles who the country would profit from should they in her in death.

The Establishment has reacted to Thatcher's death by outpourings of grief for a fellow tyrant.  In these days of austerity and mass unemployment, the evil despot is to continue to abuse the nation even in death.  Her cadaver is to be honoured in a service which the British taxpayer will have to pay for.  She is to be afforded the same honours as the traitor, Winston Churchill, who fought a war for the destruction of free Europe, which ended with the demise of Britain as a global force, and opened the doors for the mass immigration of non-Europeans into the entire European homeland. How fitting that Thatcher is to be memorialised in the same way as the man who paved the way for the genocide of Europe by miscegenation and immigrant conquest.  Thatcher's funeral will cost us millions of pounds.  Nothing is too good for the enemies of humanity.

When Thatcher's remains are ceremoniously honoured, the enemies of the people will be present in large numbers.  Doubtless the brain-dead masses will also pour onto the street to pay their respects for their mortal enemy.  We need to make it known that we will not pay for the funeral of the enemy of the nation.  Of course, our protests will be ignored.  This at least will give further proof that the UK is an occupied country, and is in no way a democracy.

Thatcher is dead.  Good riddance.  What a pity that the IRA didn't succeed in killing her back in the 1980s.  But then, of course, there was never a real plot to kill her; the IRA did the bidding of the likes of Thatcher.

Margaret Thatcher 13.10.25 - 8.4.13.  May her flesh rot and her soul be tormented for eternity.


To those who would argue that it is wrong to take comfort from the death of a woman who really was but another Establishment lackey, it should be noted that, although she in reality had no power herself, she did personally benefit from the woes inflicted upon the nation.  It is true that she was just a puppet - but without puppets to front for them, the enemy would have to do their own dirty work. For that reason, even though it may be venting anger at a puppet - and not at the real enemy - it is perfectly acceptable to celebrate the death of Thatcher.

The puppets provide the cover for the enemy. They are traitors, and the demise of just one of them is good news for us all. I doubt anyone seriously believes she actually had power - but she was the figurehead under which all manner of evil was pushed through, and as such she deserves our anger.


Update:

Some of the people who are mourning the passing of Margaret Thatcher:

http://www.thejc.com/galleries/news-galleries/margaret-thatcher-and-jewish-community?img=0

Her cabinets were filled with homosexuals, Jews and all manner of Internationalist degenerates.  To read some of the comments from the 'organised right' about Thatcher, one could be forgiven for thinking she really was a patriot!!  Oddly, it is the organised left which is celebrating her death - ironic indeed, seeing as she presided over a government which did more than any other to destroy the nation and pave the way for the obliteration of our way of life.  It is rightly said that Cameron is the heir to Thatcher - but that is to forget Blair, who was Thatcher in a Labour suit. 

One down, many, many more to go.

Armchair Nationalists - Ineffective and Reactionary

A reader sent in a comment critical of 'armchair nationalists.  The thrust of his argument can be summarised as follows:

• Nationalists in general seem to be desperately waiting for somebody else to act or a saviour to rise from the swamp of depravity in which we live
• The Establishment is your bitterest enemy, its paid servants are not on your side and they never will be: 'Help For Heroes', my arse - Historically there was never much pity for mercenaries, why should there be now?!
•  Most nationalists are just reactionaries, longing for a return to a 1950s golden idyll that really never existed. Most would happily continue to watch shit on TV and be moronic geldings drooling over sports, but just with no black faces involved, some wouldn't even mind that, it's just the muslims they hate. Revolutionaries? Hardly. Revivalists? Perhaps. Reconstructionists? Assuredly so.
• The usual suspects will repackage themselves and talk of the need for unity in the nationalist non-movement, yet none will take the all-important step of acknowledging that they are probably not the great leader required - Ego, be damned; unwitting vipers in the nest, to a man.
• As long as it someone's else kid being abused or murdered they can get (justifiably) angry in safety, and then almost as quickly as the media can drop a story involving 'ethnic crime' the armchair nationalist will return to talk of heroic ancestors, honour, kinfolk and all those things they quite palpably lack in themselves.  
• There is an obsession with popularity which manifests in 'activity' on Stormfront etc, but does not translate into real world action, other than the occasional pantomime 'demonstration' following strict guidelines given by the authorities (and accompanied by plenty of alcohol!)
• If ever the SHTF/saviour arising moment will occur, the armchair nationalists will boast of their great efforts, when the truth is that their ancestors, even if just lowly mud covered peasants, would have spat on them in derision for the cowardice. 

This comment should make uncomfortable reading.  The whole of Europe is in decline, and those who are awake to the grim reality we are facing, are content to engage in self-congratulatory rhetoric, whilst doing nothing to halt the rot.  This is shameful.  Full comment here. 

I have spent time in what is laughingly referred to as the 'nationalist movement', and can affirm everything which the reader stated in his comments.  

There is a very strong tendency for those who join political parties of the 'right' to have an unhealthy pre-occupation with rank and authority.  For those at the lower levels, the leaders are viewed as great heroes who will lead the people to victory.  For those who hold the leadership positions, this ridiculous 'Führerprinzip' is accepted without question - after-all, they are the leaders, so why should they question the wisdom of having people idolise them?  In the UK, the leadership principle has manifested as an arrogant belief that the rank and file are too stupid to have independent thoughts, and that only the leader has the ability to understand what ails the country, and how to remedy our woes.  This egocentric view has crippled any hope of independent action, and of self reliance, and has by this means been the downfall of nationalism for decades.

The comment regarding 'Help for Heroes' is especially pertinent.  Linked to the militaristic structure of nationalist organisations, there is a widely held belief that there should be no criticism of the armed forces when they are engaged in action.  If it is not acceptable to label the paid murderers of civilians as mercenaries and terrorists, when they are in the act of destroying other people's lands for the benefits of the multinational corporations and the banks, then when should the army be criticised?  When men wearing British uniforms are murdering people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, et al (not to forget the British soldiers hiding in civilians clothes in Syria, doing likewise), then it is not only right to expose them as brutal murderers in the pay of the international menace, it is necessary. 

The nationalists who stay silent out of respect for the army, give their support to the machinations of the Establishment.  If nationalists had the decency to take to the streets in protest against our people being sent to destroy other people for the economic benefit of the global enemy, then that would send a message to the front-line soldiers, that rebellion against what is obviously evil, is supported by the people.  Silence condemns those who would stand up to their commanding officers, leaving them alone and abandoned to the whims of the State.  Why do nationalists say nothing when the British Army is turned into an economic killing machine?  Because they believe that one day the Army will awaken and liberate our lands, and they dare not say anything which might upset them and thus prevent this awakening!  There is another word for this ideological position - it is cowardice.  Again, the nationalist movement is looking to others to provide salvation - and it is looking in a direction from which it will not come; the soldiers themselves know that the nationalist movement refuses to help them at the very moment when their officers are forcing them to commit the most unspeakable acts against ordinary people in their own lands.  Yet the leaders in the nationalist movement seriously expect this betrayal to garner respect!

Are nationalists reactionaries?  There are good people who oppose internationalism, who are far from reactionary; people who are looking to the construction of a new society to replace the decadent and diseased one which we live in at present.  However, by and large, the organised nationalist movement is indeed reactionary, looking backwards to an idyllic utopia, which never existed.  Such people are the worst kind of conservatives; seeking to restore society to some theoretical point of perfection.  They believe that if only we can repeal legislation such as the Race Relations Acts, the 'gay' marriage laws, etc, and expel those who entered our country after the Second World War, then everything will be wonderful.  They fail to realise that everything which has befallen this country, has been done with the blessing of the Establishment, and that should the system be restored to some previous point, history will inevitably be repeated.  The system itself is at fault, and it has to be destroyed completely and utterly, and after having been torn down, only then can a new society emerge, built upon completely different principles.  We need a revolution in thought and in deed; this is something the present nationalist movement cannot deliver.

Anyone who has ever attended a nationalist meeting, will know that there are a considerable number of nationalists who behave like Sabbath-observant Jews.  Whereas the Jews will not undertake any work from dusk on Friday to dusk on Saturday due to religious demands, many nationalists will not take part in any activities from Friday afternoon until late Saturday due to the draw of the pub, and of football!  These 'fighters for the nation' cannot possibly forego a night of drunkenness, and to suggest that the nation is a little more important than watching the 'team' kick a ball around, is to provoke reactions of incredulity!  The people who speak of the need for repatriation of non-Europeans, idolise these same outsiders when they wear a football shirt!  Too many nationalists believe that football is 'more than a game' and will even go to great length to argue that non-European football players must be allowed to remain in the UK.  This mentality is a gift to the internationalists and liberals who ridicule those who purport to oppose them.  The deliberate targeting of football hooligans for recruitment was bound to ensure a membership with -at best - a part-time commitment to the cause.  So much for the wisdom of the leaders!

Nationalist meetings can be an embarrassment.  The tendency towards drunkenness is a very real problem.  How can people possibly hope to be of use to their kin, if they cannot remain sober for the duration of a nationalist gathering?  I have seen people in such states of drunkenness that they have lost their belongings and become aggressive to others who they have accused of being thieves!  So much for camaraderie!  Perhaps emboldened by alcohol, so-called nationalists have ridiculed guest speakers from different European lands for having different accents; indeed this has also applied to people from different parts of the home nation.  Nationalist meetings tend to be structured so as to allow a series of speakers to stand up and say their piece - often to rapturous applause - followed by a social gathering for the individuals present to discuss what has been said by the speakers, and - which matters most - to formulate action.  This is all well and good - except for the fact that the social gatherings tend to become purely social, and not only are the words from the podium quickly forgotten, but all calls to action become wasted words.  The attendees leave with a feeling that they have 'done their bit', whereas they have done nothing.

Perhaps the most repugnant aspect of nationalist meetings is the refusal to face the fact that the Establishment itself is the enemy.  In the UK, the Windsor family is the apex of the Class System.  Without the Windsors, the entire divisive system would fall, and the nation could achieve unity across the false economic divisions which pit worker against manager, and rich against poor.  

Every piece of legislation in the UK has to achieve Royal Assent, before it can be implemented.  Every war, every act of social engineering, every sell-off of national industry to internationalist financial parasites, every hand-out to the banks, every transfer of power to the European soviet Union - every act of treason against the people has been given the Royal seal of approval.  The Windsors could symbolically refuse to give assent to acts of evil - thus exposing the deeds carried out by the false democrats, and perhaps even making the country a less diabolical better place to live in - but they do not.  Yet for all this, nationalists rub shoulders with monarchists, and even sing the awful sycophantic dirge, 'God Save the Queen'.  The leaders of the nationalist movement proclaim that it is only the monarchy which prevents the UK becoming a vassal of the internationalist order!  Of course, in their unthinking hostility to all things socialist, most nationalists whole-heartedly support the capitalist system.  Tragically, those who dare to speak out against the real enemy tend to be labelled as 'traitors', and their views are quickly proscribed.  Not only do the sheep not see the danger of the wolf, they worship at its feet.

All the political parties which stand in elections, obey the rules of the Establishment.  For this reason, no serious actions can be taken.  Parties take money from their members, which they then redistribute to the State itself, in the form of electoral deposits - which are seldom returned.  Aside from pointless forays into the false democratic cesspit, activities are limited to standing around street corners haranguing passers-by to buy the party newspaper, and poorly-attended demonstrations which only serve as a display of numerical weakness.  Demonstrations tend to be held at the weekend due to the inability of workers to take time off from work during the week (and of course to allow for members of the public who work, to see the demonstrations).  Should the events clash with football matches, the turn out of members will be even more pitiful than otherwise.  Due to the mutual hostility of the various factions within the nationalist movement, public events tend to be attended by very few people indeed - aside from the police presence to ensure nothing 'forbidden' is discussed.  As the comment writer stated, when gatherings are sizeable, they tend to become day time drinking sessions.  The site of flag-waving (and all too often, kebab-eating) drunkards chanting incoherently impresses no-one.

The factional divisions in the nationalist movement are a direct product of the Führerprinzip.  The belief that only a mass movement can save the nation, drives each party to compete for members.  The main source of members is not from the public at large, but from rival factions.  Thus we have the ludicrous situation in which parties spend more time attacking one another than in exposing the enemy.  The amount of time they spend in constructively helping the local communities in which the members live, is almost nil (or in many cases, is nil.)  There are no projects to help the indigenous poor (such as held by Golden Dawn in Greece).  There are no vigilante patrols to combat pædophiles.  It is no wonder that there is no mass support for nationalism, when the nationalist organisations do nothing for the nation!

As well as poaching one another's members, the leaders of the parties constantly prattle on about nationalist unity.  This amounts to an expectation for all other organisations to dissolve themselves and recognise the authority of the leader making the call.  In order to make the other organisations 'see the light' and disband, much time and effort is spent on propaganda aimed at destabilising the other organisations.  A lot of effort goes into internet activity on Stormfront, VNN et al, building support from within the fold against the rivals - the King of the Castle mentality is very much alive online.  

There really is no need for an anti-fascist movement in the UK; the nationalists themselves do more than a competent job of wrecking all effective opposition to multi-culti internationalist liberalism and Marxism.  Periodically, the impact of propaganda against organisations results in new factions arising which have their own ideological purity - and or course, their own leaders.  Occasionally new organisations spring up from outcasts of the others.  All the factions, no matter how large or small, hate all the others and believe themselves to be the only possible salvation for the nation.  At election time, it is not unusual to see several 'nationalist' parties fighting in the same constituency.  The result is a guaranteed split vote, derisory votes for each candidate, and multiple deposits given over to the State.  The public naturally see this petty squabbling for the lunacy it is, and therefore unsurprisingly do not rush to join the nationalist cause.  The leaders cannot see this; so obsessed are they with defeating the other factions, they cannot see that their actions are self-defeating too.

The writer of the comments is right. The nationalist movement in the UK is a disgrace. The unwillingness to reject the system in its entirety and to abolish the institutions which have presided over our ruin, condemns those who join the many electoral parties to become a part of the very structure which has ruined our land. 

So what is the alternative?

Opposition to the international menace does not require political parties.  Self reliance and  initiative are the key to worthy action.  We all have our part to play: home schooling our children (and helping others to break free from the State indoctrination system); using alternative medicine (thus not supporting big pharma); using untaxable means of exchange (bartering, local currencies); producing our own food (even if that can only be herbs, peppers etc); supporting local traders (boycotting international concerns); policing our own streets; driving heroin dealers etc out of our areas; taking action against exploitative employers (gluing locks, picketing premises, producing leaflets exposing them and advertising honourable alternatives); looking after the elderly and infirm; giving free DVDs to educate people (and turning our own televisions off); the list could go on.  We are limited only by ourselves.  When we need to work in groups, we can use the methods outlined in the Nest Leaders Manual (linked HERE).  There is much that we can do, and we do not need parties to do anything.  Parties hinder us.  Without parties, there is no 'party line' to obey, and of course no need to obey the diktat of any leaders.

There is a belief that we must belong to a particular 'movement' or adhere to a particular strand of thought.  This is nonsense.  The only people who benefit by our joining official organisations are those who lead them (and profit from them) and the State which uses such organisations to gather information about those who oppose them.  Of course, freed from all official organisations gives us the freedom to act as we wish.  Rather than play the Establishment game, it is better that we build our own communities as bastions of freedom - independent in thought, and in terms of self reliance, separate from the State.  The old methods have failed, are still failing, and cannot but fail.  As the reader who sent the comments in noted, the 'nationalist movement' in the UK is dead in the water, and led by self-serving opportunists and intellectual cowards.  If we seriously cherish freedom, we have to think - and act - outside the confines of the system.

No one is going to save us.  We have to save ourselves.  If we are to have any hope of salvation, we have to forge a revolution within ourselves.  If an uprising is to come, we must be a part of it.  Maybe by our deeds, we will speed along the disconnection of the organic nation from the despotic rulers. That, in itself, is a revolutionary act.  Should enough of us act right now, as agents of the coming free nation, then we will become as parts of a growing snowball, which will grow into a crushing avalanche, liberating our people from the enemy.  Let those who play in the sandpit of party politics waste their time and resources; let them do so without us joining in.  Hopefully they will see the errors of their way, and throw away the crutches they so blindly cling to.  However, whether they do or not, it is our job to ensure that a genuine indigenous counter culture grows to replace the decadent Establishment; and to do all we can to hasten the end of our enemies' rule.