Houla Massacre: Another BBC Lie

The above image needs to be clicked on to enlarge it, and then read thoroughly.  The BBC has yet again been caught out pushing propaganda on behalf of the war mongers of the Establishment.  The latest incident features imagery of a child skipping over the bagged up corpses of slain civilians.  According to the BBC, the corpses are those of Syrians murdered by the Syrian government, and are incontrovertible proof that the government of Bashar Al Assad must be overthrown.  The so-called Houla Massacre is a complete fraud; the corpses are those of Kurds recovered from a mass grave in 2003 in Al Musayyib. 

The BBC have really surpassed themselves with this propaganda gaff.  Not only have they used stock imagery to invent a massacre in order to demand military intervention against Syria, but the imagery they have used features people who were murdered with the full blessing of the UK government.  At the time that the Kurds were slaughtered in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was the darling of the west, and just as with the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians, the victims were of no consequence to the western despots.

The fake Houla Massacre comes at the time that the Serbian hero, Ratko Mladić, is on trial for the murder of Muslims in Srebrenica.  The Houla Massacre is a repetition of the Srebrenica Massacre - Neither of them is real, and both of these propaganda exercises serve to stir up hatred for besieged nations fighting for their very survival against the international aggression of finance imperialism.

The BBC presents itself as the most beloved broadcaster of the world.  Of course this is a typical propaganda technique.  For those who care to look behind the lies, the BBC is a loathsome and belligerent propaganda tool of a regime of tyrants who have no empathy for humanity; only a lust for wealth and power.

In 2001 the BBC infamously broadcast live video footage of the Salomon Building (World Trade Centre 7) collapsing due to the (State) terrorist attack.  It broadcast too early, and the building could clearly be seen standing and smouldering behind the reporter's left shoulder.  The BBC was instrumental in creating the Al Qaeda myth which blamed Afghanistan for 9/11, the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie which justified the invasion of Iraq, the Srebrenica lie which legitimised the destruction of Serbia and the creation of the bandit states of Kosovo and Bosnia-Metohija, the Benghazi færytale used to crush Libya, and now it is driving the entire anti-Syrian campaign, and the campaign against Iran.  All the while, the BBC has ignored the crimes of Israel against the people of Palestine and other territories occupied by the Jewish State.

The BBC is a lie factory.  It has been the mouthpiece of the British State since its birth.  It has propagandised ceaselessly for the materialistic Internationale, and has destroyed the lives of those who oppose its sinister agenda.  The BBC still misuse the photographs of the German victims of Red Army brutality and RAF terror bombing in the Second World War; presenting them as dead Jews killed by the Germans.  The misuse of the Al Musayyib photographs as proof of a massacre in Houla is a repetition of the propaganda against Germany, and indeed all the 'Goyim' of Europe.

The BBC is the bastion of political correctness, and uses its so-called entertainment programmes to defame heterosexuality, faithfulness, ethnic cohesion, culture and indeed all that is natural and wholesome.  The BBC is the enemy of humanity.  Everything it produces is the propaganda of the Establishment.

The lies of the BBC are being used to soften the British people so that the people accept, nay demand, war against Syria.  These lies must be exposed.  If we stay silent as the BBC promotes the destruction of all nations who do not bow to the Zionist Internationale, then who will speak when they come for us?  We need a common front against the vipers of the Establishment.  

To anyone who still pays a licence fee to this vermin, surely it is time to stop?  Let them know why you will not pay for their lies.  We in the UK have to inform our countrymen of the truth.  The lies of the BBC are repeated hypnotically until they become accepted subconsciously.  It is not enough to understand that the BBC lies; we must inform everyone we can of the truth.  Don't let the Houla lie become the justification for the destruction of Syria and the expansion of the Israeli terror state.  We have voices.  We must use them.

BBC: Trotskyite propaganda machine

BBC Radio 5 is the perfect tonic for people suffering with low blood pressure, but doesn't aid the health of the British people as a whole.  On the Nicky Campbell programme this morning, the national deficit was discussed in the light of the election of President Hollande in France.  As if the people of the UK are not aware of just how biased the BBC is, one of the invited guests on the programme was none other than an official of the Socialist Workers Party.

The Trotskyite SWP officer, of course, blamed 'the rich' for all the ills of society, but failed to mention that the parasitic rich who are destroying our country, are not members of the indigenous population.  The Bankers were ignored, and instead tax-dodging multi-nationals were blamed for all our woes.  The whole crux of the SWP argument was for increased taxation at the highest earning level.  As one has come to expect of the BBC, the SWP viewpoint was given vast amounts of airtime, but the real solutions to capitalism were not even addressed.

A listener rang in to point out that the SWP are Trotskyite and that their ideology is responsible for over 100 million deaths in the last century alone.  When a second caller rang in with the same point, Nicky Campbell laughed off the deaths of a staggering number of people, and stated that the debate was about austerity, and not the minutiæ of Trotskyism!

Imagine for one moment that a caller rang into the BBC to discuss the fact that the Banking cabal is Jewish, and that the solution to Capitalism is the abolition of the monetary system which sees money borrowed into existence as debt owed to the international bankers, rather than created as credit by the State, and - which is most important - to remove usury and all Judaic economics from our country?  The BBC would shriek hysterically that correctly identifying the monetary problem and its solution was 'racist', 'anti-Semitic' and 'right-wing extremist'.  The caller would be blocked from accessing airtime, and would most certainly not be invited to contribute in the role of an expert on economics (which is what the SWP member was referred to as this morning).  The No Platform policy of the BBC would probably be extended to reporting the caller for thought crimes and having him or her arrested by the politicised police for incitement to racial/religious hatred!

The BBC routinely describes anyone who doesn't agree with its Trotskyite ideology as a far right extremist, neo-Nazi or some similar label.  The BBC is the official State Broadcaster and an extension of the Establishment.  The Nicky Campbell programme was a typical example of reporting under government restrictions.  As if allowing the SWP free rein was not biased enough, another caller rang in to state that the economic problems stemmed from the debts incurred in the Second World War, and that we all had a duty to pay our share as gratitude for the fact that we are not all speaking German!  The caller was not indigenous, thus had we not fought the suicidal war, he would not be in this country in the first place to dictate to the indigenous population about how grateful we should be for the destruction of our culture in the Crusade to create Israel! The idea that we would be speaking German is ludicrous, and in any case Anglo-Saxons are Germans!

I think I will have to cut down my exposure to the BBC, unless I become diagnosed with hypotension, in which case I know that by tuning in to hear the political rantings of the Talmudic materialists, my blood pressure is guaranteed to soar.

UK Government claim Syrian Government behind terrorist bombings.

The UK is ruled by the most despicable people on the planet.  In 2001 the Establishment were chief amongst the organisers of the World Trade Centre Massacre.  In 2005 they organised the London Transport Massacre.  In each case they scape-goated Muslims in order to justify wars of aggression against countries who were strategically and financially important to the expansion of the City of London's One World State project.

In the latest chapter in the UK-led ongoing war of aggression against humanity, terrorists in the employ of the UK regime have massacred 55 people in Damascus, Syria.  Arch War Criminal, William Hague initially blamed the Syrian Government for the atrocity, even having the audacity to refer to the massacre as a false flag operation.  It must be really embarrassing that the follow-up bomb in Aleppo was thwarted by Syrian security forces; Al CIA Duh are slipping.

The propaganda mouthpiece of the London regime, the BBC, aired Hague's view repeatedly until the terrorists admitted that they were responsible for the carnage, and since then any reference to Hague's comments have disappeared down the memory hole.  The BBC had the effrontery to proclaim that we in the west would find the idea of a government killing its own people unbelievable.  But then, of course, the people who declared live on air that the Solomon Building (World Trade Centre 7) had collapsed, whilst it was still visibly intact, wouldn't know anything about collusion with State murderers would they?

William Hague has withdrawn all UK diplomatic staff from Syria, and called upon other countries to do likewise.  Why?  Is he thinking of sending the winged terrorists of NATO to reprise their role in Libya (which was itself an echo of the UK terrorist RAF's destruction of Dresden)?

In the expected, but nonetheless disgraceful, arrogance typical of the UK government, William Hague stated of the Damascus Massacre by his Al Qaeda, sorry Free Syrian Army terrorists,

'Yet again it is the people of Syria who are suffering as a result of the repression and violence, which must come to an end.'

Then ominously, he added,

'I call on the opposition to take all steps necessary to bring about a sustainable end to the violence.'

So there you have it, straight from the mouth of William Hague, the killer of children; the Al Qaeda terrorists are called upon to end the war of aggression by taking all steps necessary, and it is the fault of the Syrian government that the terrorists under UK control are killing them.

There are words to describe people such as William Hague, but I will refrain from using them, as unlike William Hague I do have some values.  Syria is to be obliterated ready for occupation by Israel and Turkey, and for the big push to take over Iran.  All the while the smiling politicians will continue lying through their teeth that these acts of globalist imperialism are somehow for the good of the common people.  Tell that to the people of Libya, Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia or any of the other lands destroyed by the blood soaked pariahs who rule in our name.

In olden times people such as William Hague would have been dealt with appropriately, and their treacherous heads put on pikes as a warning to anyone else who would serve materialism over humanity.  Some traditions really are worth reviving.

Nation-wrecking BBC lauds mentally-ill 78 year old 'sex changer'

Just when you thought the BBC couldn't get any more embarrassingly politicised, it drops to previously unimaginable depths.  On the BBC Radio 5 Victoria Derbyshire programme, a 78 year old man with mental health issues was allowed to humiliate his family by professing to be a woman trapped inside a man's body.  

During the nauseating spectacle (which you can listen to here), James Rose was given air time to describe how he has studied the differences between men and women, and has now come to the conclusion that he is in fact a woman, and so, even though he is 78 years old, he is going to be sexually mutilated to remove his penis.

The Father of three, and Grandfather of four, spoke in a typically deep male voice about his fantasies of being female, and rather than suggest the aged gentleman seek help from psychiatric professionals, the politically correct interviewer, Derbyshire, insisted throughout the programme in calling him Ruth.  She even went so far as to berate a listener for referring to James as a man, which is of course what he is.

The notion that gender is a social construct is pure liberal nonsense.  It fits in with the idea that we are all the same under the skin and that visible physiological differences are of no importance.  This is itself really quite offensive as it belittles the innate qualities of men and women, and of the diverse nations of humanity.  

To the liberal-materialist mind, people are basically the same, with no outstanding characteristics, and nothing of merit to distinguish them from the other producing-consuming featherless bipeds who roam the Earth.  As we are all the same, our focus can only be on acquisition of material goods and physical survival, as, (so the materialists would have it), culture, race, spirituality, tradition, gender, intellect, etc are all social constructs which exist to oppress us, and we will all be better off when these things are gone and we can all be self-obsessed hedonists devoid of the real essence of humanity.  This bleak view is the liberal utopia.  Thank you, but no thanks.

James Rose is set to have his penis removed next year when he will be 80 years old.  Up until now his disorder has been limited to cross-dressing.  Mr Rose spoke of how his children are unhappy about him sliding into a world of self-absorption in which his foibles have become so important to him that he is unable to consider the feelings of his children.  He is not allowed to see his grandchildren due to his children taking the necessary, but doubtless heart-rending step, of keeping him away from them for their own protection.  For a man to wilfully separate himself from his own flesh and blood due to a fetish, is proof that the poor man needs help, not molly-coddling and encouragement.

Mr Rose spoke at length about how he studies the way women hold their heads, walk, talk etc, and tries to emulate them.  If he really was a woman, he wouldn't have to study feminine characteristics, as he would already have them.  The fact that he can identify the distinguishing traits which differentiate men from women gives proof to the innate existence of theses differences.  His own studies prove that he is a man.  He may be a man who likes to play at dressing up, and more than likely gets sexual pleasure from his transvestism, but he is a man nonetheless.

There have always been transvestites.  There have always been homosexuals.  There have always been pædophiles.  In the case of fetishists, be it those who like to dress up in rubber, latex, clothes of the opposite sex, bondage, or whatever, so long as their kinkiness remains in the bedroom and remains between consenting adults of the opposite sex, it doesn't harm anyone.  Many men like women to wear high heels as it alters the shape of the calf muscle.  Many women find uniforms arousing due to their association with masculine and brave men such as firemen.  These could be called fetishes of sorts, but they are harmless.  Homosexuality and pædophilia are harmful to everyone involved, and in the case of Mr Rose, his particular quirk has crossed from the realm of the peculiar into that which is dangerous. 

Why are there now more sexual deviants than ever before?  We ingest hormones in our food from livestock which has been subjected to growth altering drugs.  Our water supplies have been contaminated with hormones from the contraceptive pill.  The mass use of airborne chemicals in industry, and of pharmaceuticals, all have impacted upon our physical and mental health.  The changes we see in puberty, with girls starting their periods at ever younger ages, are not natural, but a result of irresponsible industrial practices which have contaminated the very air we breath and the food we eat with toxins which are detrimental to our health.  The increase in illness produced by the modern era of selfish and uncaring multi-nationals conglomerates does not only manifest in cancers, heart disease etc, but also in mental illness such as that suffered by men who think they are women.

The BBC programme was typical of what one would expect from the State broadcaster.  The British Establishment is a central part of the international cabal which seeks the destruction of difference, in order to create a uniform world of mindless materialists.  For such people, men and women are the same, and it is therefore merely an enhanced form of cosmetic surgery to change the physical appearance of one into the other.

un-necessary surgery does not help.

In a sane world, there would be laws forbidding the contamination of the food chain by pharmaceutical corporations; health care would be focused upon treating illnesses, not masking symptoms with drugs; those responsible for industrial pollution such as the BP atrocity in the Gulf of Mexico would be dealt with in the harshest possible ways (rather than covering-up their crimes, and even as in the case of BP, orchestrating the invasion of Libya to replace BP's lost profits); mental and physical health would be considered as a whole and not used for political purposes; men such as Mr Rose would be helped back to normality rather than condemned to travel further into insanity.

I feel sorry for Mr Rose, and especially for his family.  He has been used by the BBC as a poster boy for the Establishment's attack on the natural society.  If he survives the operation, he will have the physical appearance of a woman (a very tall woman with big hands!), but he will still be a man, and no amount of surgery or media propaganda will change that.

Is the War of Terror targeting Pakistan?

The Zionist wars of aggression being played out around the globe are a danger to us all.  The latest propaganda by the Jewish President of the USA, Barry 'Obama' Dunham seeks to dæmonise Pakistan and to stir up separatism in Balochistan. Whereas the imperialist wars have so far focused on countries with relatively few emigrants to Europe and the USA, any attack against Pakistan would be of a wholly different nature.

In Europe, the Pakistani population is massive.  In England, there are over one million Pakistanis; the vast majority of whom live in self-contained colonies in the Pennine spine of England, and in the cities from the Midlands down to Luton.  These colonies are residence to many Pakistanis who have not even bothered to learn English, due to a complete lack of identification with any country outside the Muslim world.  

The global war, which should be called the Third World War due to the number of fronts and countries being attacked by the Zionist Axis, has killed more people than the number of Jews alleged to have been killed by Hitler.  Unlike the Shoah færy tale with its mythical gas chambers, lampshades and soap, the holocaust of Libyans, Iraqis, Afghans, Somalis, Serbians, etc etc is real.  The true figure of Jewish deaths in the Second World War (from all causes, mostly natural or US/UK inflicted, but excluding those fighting in the Wehrmacht), was fewer than those murdered by Bomber Harris' terrorist RAF raids on Dresden.  The Muslim world is more aware of this reality than the cowed and zionised nations of Europe and the west.

Muslims have been dæmonised by the media since 2001 when they were blamed for the MOSSAD-CIA-MI6 massacre at the World Trade Centre.  They were blamed for the follow-up atrocities, organised by the same forces, in Madrid and Bali.  The phantom Al Qaeda Network of Wahhabi terrorists has been used to create the image of evil Muslims out to 'get' the West.  The fact that Wahhabism is a sect created by Talmudists, and has about as much in common with Islam as Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientologists and Mormons have with Christianity, is never discussed by the mainstream media, and of course the creation of Al Qaeda as a front for US military operations against the USSR, although exposed in Adam Curtis' BBC documentary, 'the Power of Nightmares', is conveniently forgotten.  Interestingly, the Curtis series also exposed Operation Gladio in which Europeans were murdered by the secret police in terrorist attacks, and Nationalists such as Roberto Fiore were blamed.

Links to Power of Nightmares Video:
Part 1 - http://youtu.be/xGo1DqmfHjY

Part 2 - http://youtu.be/o0kNNqZk3mg

Part 3 - http://youtu.be/qATc5jRbVOA

The global cabal are consummate chess players.  They plan every move with absolute precision, and are more than happy to play the long game.  Their patience is astounding, as is their methodology.  The scapegoating of Muslims for Zionist atrocities has created an atmosphere of mistrust amongst non-Muslims, and feelings of wrongful persecution amongst Muslims themselves.  In the UK, Zionist fronts such as the English Defence League were created by the Establishment to stir up hatred between the Muslim colonists and the host population.  As we can now see with the Breivik case, the murder of civilians solely justified as an act of war against Islam, is being used to further polarise opinion and create deeper hostility between the indigenous population and the non-adaptive newcomers.

Why are there millions of Pakistanis in Europe?   Around 10% of Oslo is of Pakistani origin, and in the district of the town where I live, the figure is probably closer to 90%.  Mass immigration was orchestrated to drive down salaries, raise unemployment, and generally take power away from the working man and give it to unscrupulous multi-nationals.  Trades Unions have supported immigration, knowing full-well that rapid increases in population are detrimental to working conditions - regardless of the ethnic origin of the newcomers - but then, the Trades Unions of today are politically-motivated, and the well-being of the worker is of far less importance to the Union leaders than political ideology of their internationalist masters.

Immigration has broken the link of people to land, with swathes of Europe becoming alien-occupied territory, complete with self contained economies, and cultural and spiritual facilities.  The drive to a single mongrelised world ruled over by the self-Chosen who remain ethnically aloof in their fortress country is certainly a part of the reason for mass immigration.  With Pakistanis, the tendency to marry within the race is particularly strong, even if miscegenation with European girls is a growing phenomenon.  Just as Jews see sex with shiksas as practice before settling down to marry within the race, so Pakistani males may have sex with 'cultural-less infidel white slags', but they will not marry them.  

Some Europeans have converted to Islam, but the media and education system-damaged girls who drink to excess, take hard drugs, are covered in tattoos which they display from their overly exposed flesh, have sex to be popular and not appear 'racist', tend to be used and abused and not considered of sufficient quality for marriage - which is understandable. Such girls do dilute the gene-pool of the indigenous population, but their behaviour leaves the Pakistani colonies intact, which doesn't serve the global agenda insofar as mongrelisation of all the Goy races is concerned.

Perhaps the sabre-rattling against Pakistan indicates the main reason for the invitation by the Zionist Establishment of millions of Pakistanis into the European homeland.  The Establishment want war against Pakistan to become war inside Europe between Europeans and Pakistanis.  The majority of Pakistanis, just like everyone else, want to live peacefully and go about their business un-molested.  The propaganda that all Muslims are eager to become martyrs for Islam is just that, propaganda.  Certainly there are Muslims who would happily blow themselves up for the cause (and having worked alongside such people, the fanaticism is quite alarming), but by and large, most Muslims regard death as something to welcome when it arrives, but they are in no hurry to get there quickly.  This raises the serious question as to how the Establishment would deal with those who do not fit the propaganda stereotype.

Would the Establishment be willing to bomb cities in the West using their paid fanatics in their Al Qaeda units?  Of course they would.  Would they be willing to carry out false flag operations and blame the Pakistanis for them?  New York 11/9/1, Madrid 11/3/4 and London 7/7/5 answer that question.  Would a war against Pakistan be used to fuel unrest in Europe as an excuse to bring in the Police State complete with concentration camps?  I wouldn't doubt it for a moment.

In Pakistan, there is a growing feeling that war is coming.  The implications for Europe are worrying.  Whether Pakistanis will commit terrorist acts against Europe is open to debate, but if one puts oneself in the shoes of an immigrant whose family is being killed by the forces of the host country, then the probability of some form of violent resistance does become more likely.

If war comes, we may see the bizarre spectacle of European patriots supporting a war of aggression against Pakistan as a reaction to the propaganda of the Zionists leading us into war.  The Establishment have created Breivik and groups such as the EDL to form a solid support base for their wars.  Europeans will die as a result of the coming war.  Pakistanis will die in their own country, provoking anger in the colonies, which may spill over into bloodshed in our homeland.  The Zionists who will gain from this will be safe in their well-guarded communities. 

The time to stop a war is before it starts.  To secure Europe, we must throw off the Zionist vermin which treat us as unthinking cattle.  We must demand a halt to all immigration and a return to their homelands of all non-Europeans.  For the safety of the indigenous population, and the colonists, the colonies must be removed.  The cost of war is far higher economically than would be the cost of relocating the colonists to their homelands, and providing them with financial support which would benefit their homelands as well as themselves.  The human cost of any war which serves Zion and the International Order is unacceptable.  It is of paramount importance that the Axis of Evil is stopped, and the control of Europe worldwide is returned to Europeans. 

We now face a situation in which the Muslims in Europe will be fighting for what is right, and the indigenous population will be coerced into supporting evil.  We do not have to become pawns for the internationalists.  We can take a third position which doesn't support Islam or the Internationale; we can stand up for Europe and every country in the world by demanding the disbanding of NATO, the EU, IMF, World Bank, UN etc and the breaking up of the multi-national corporations which are directing the international agenda.  We can refuse to play along with the 'blame the muzzies' game, and seek a just and honourable return of all people to their own countries, including Europeans outside the European world.  A world, of free and ethnically homogeneous countries is the solution to internationalism and all expressions of supremacism.  Stopping the use of our military to destroy those who resist the One Worlders is the first step.

For a take on the situation from inside Pakistan, see the following:
(Direct link - http://www.youtube.com/embed/qkqfeZFUahc)

Trouble is brewing, and it is the usual suspects who are behind it.  In the short term, we may have to temporarily ally ourselves with the Muslim colonists in order to stop the more dangerous Zionist menace; but ultimately we must achieve independence from all occupation, Jewish, Muslim, or whatever.  It is the traitors in Westminster, Bruxelles and Washington who have engineered this tragedy, and it is they who must be dealt with.  Fighting one another is what they want.  This we cannot afford to do.

Breivik the Zionist: Enemy of Nationalism

As the trial of Anders Breivik continues, the internationalists are using the Breivik case to libel all Nationalists as would-be terrorists.  It is indicative of the liberal extremist mindset, that any expression of loyalty to nation or country is now labelled 'Fascist'.  In the following video from Russia Today, opposition to the Islamification of the UK is referred to as the politics of the Far Right.  Thus love of our Christian heritage, and the desire to protect our people from the spread of the incompatible ideologies and faiths of those who dwell in immigrant colonies and openly express hatred of the European nation, is now deemed a form of extremism!  It is obvious to anyone who has had dealings with the 'anti-Fascists' that they exist to police the people into accepting the borderless soul-less one world State, and that their condemnation of anyone as extremist, is incredibly hypocritical.

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=dwxq_ml0T0o

Anders Breivik is a Zionist.  His outspoken support for homosexuality, freemasonry, Jewish-occupied Palestine et al are proof that he is not a Nationalist.  His murder of Norwegians, (such as the girl pictured to the right), when he could just as easily have butchered Pakistanis, creates a hatred of Nationalism amongst those who do not look behind the media lies.  Of course, murdering anyone is unacceptable, but in Oslo where around 10% of the population is Muslim, surely he could have made his point without killing Norwegians?

The ideology espoused by Breivik in the video which follows, makes a strong case against the multi-cultists.  When Islamic countries such as Egypt introduce laws to allow men to have sex with the corpses of their dead wives, it is only natural that Europeans should be disgusted by those who advocate - and carry out - such practices.  However, coupling murder to ideology, only serves to undermine the ideology itself, and in the case of the murderer of Norwegian children, that acts of terror do not strengthen Europe, but weaken us.  The means must always be consistent with the end.  Attempts to justify the unjustifiable are the product of Talmudic thought and have no place in Europe. 

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlceKEiir6I&feature=related

We who fight against internationalism, do so because we love our people, and indeed we see the value of all people.  We respect the rights of everyone to live amongst his and her own kind, immersed in the indigenous culture, as part of an unbroken chain linking our ancestors to those yet to come.  Internationalism is the great threat which seeks to destroy all humanity.  We may not agree with the Jewish worldview, but we respect the right of the Jews to live together unmolested by non-Jews - indeed we support the right of all Jews to relocate to the Jewish State (Birobidjan, not Palestine) and live at peace with their neighbours.  Breivik has tarred the name of the anti-internationalists by associating our struggle with terrorism.  This, of course, is the reason for the atrocities commited in Oslo, which Breivik has claimed responsibility for, but were more than likely the work of the MOSSAD.

Breivik was not alone on Utoya Island.  He did not have the time or opportunity to plant the bombs in Oslo.  The whole Breivik case stinks of Zionist orchestration, and is definitely a false flag designed to crush genuine dissent to the international order.  We can now see why groups such as the EDL were formed: to bring those who oppose mass immigration into the spotlight, and then to use them to scapegoat genuine opponents of the international cabal.  Don't be fooled by the likes of Breivik.  Just like 9/11, 7/7, Pearl Harbour, the Madrid and Bali bombings, the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, both World Wars, and many many other acts of pure evil, the Oslo atrocity was the work of the Elders of Zion.  And yet again, those who oppose their tyranny, face persecution as scape-goats for crimes committed by the real enemy of all humanity.

14 Defining Characteristics of Zionist-Materialism

Like Pavlov's dogs, there is a tendency for people to shriek hysterically at the mention of the word 'Fascist'.  For most people, no attempt is made to understand what is meant by Fascism, and thus they fall into the trap of attacking an ideology just because the Establishment media tell them to.  Such people probably believe in the 6 million kosher corpses yarn, and wet the bed upon hearing tales of the latest Zionist Islamic  al CIAda Al Qaeda plot, scurrying to their Zionist democratic owners representatives for protection.  For grown up, culturally, spiritually and politically awake individuals, this acceptance of Establishment-induced hysteria is really not a good thing.

Gregory Patin, writing for the informative and read-worthy Activist Post, has fallen into the 'boo hiss' anti-Fascist trap.  His article, '14 defining characteristics of fascism' takes at face value the work of secular humanist, Laurence Britt, which defines Fascism as the ultimate evil.  Patin then runs with this assumption and paints the 'New World Order' as Fascistic and presumably as a plot to exterminate the Jews

Patin's acceptance of Britt's analysis is interesting in itself, and indicates his ideological prejudice.  To seriously align oneself to the 'left', or the 'right' to the exclusion of opposing ideologies and ways of thought, is to acquiesce in one's own enslavement.  Left and Right are Establishment-created divisions, such as the manufactured Class Warfare which pits owner against worker; white collar against blue.  We need to steer clear of these divisions and see the value of unity.  Those who seek to polarise us into rival camps are the one's who control every manufactured division.  The only division we should tolerate is the splitting off of those who support the internationalist enslavers, from those who oppose them; no one should aid the despots who feel themselves to be superior to the rest of humanity, even to the point of believing some non-existent deity Chose them to be that way.

Patin deals with the USA in his work, but his research could equally be applied to the EU or many other countries.  The 14 Characteristics of Fascism he cites, can be summarised as follows:

1. Nationalism
2. Human Rights abuses
3. Scapegoating of enemies (e.g. Jews, Muslims)
4. Militarism
5. Sexism/Homophobia and opposition to the murder of unborn children
6. Controlled media
7. National Security paranoia
8. Unification of State and Faith
9. Protection of Corporate power
10. Undermining Workers' Rights
11. Opposition to degenerate art
12. Police State
13. Corruption and Cronyism
14. Election Fraud

This list highlights the thinking of Britt, and its adoption betrays the motives of Patin.  The list is dishonest, and links together aspects of the internationalist agenda with measures to oppose it.

Starting with the points highlighted in red, which could be called fascistic, let us examine how these apply to the USA:

(1) Recently, school pupils were admonished for chanting USA! USA!  Nationalism may be a characteristic of fascism, but it most certainly is not a characteristic of the government of the USA.  Just as in the UK, expression of patriotism is encouraged, but nationalism is forbidden.  Why?  Because Patriotism is loyalty to the State, whereas Nationalism is loyalty to the people.  Internationalism seeks the destruction of all which differentiates individuals and nations, thus Nationalism is defence against Internationalism, and so is forbidden by the architects of the Single Global State. 

(5) Protection of the family and the unborn as living humans, not as things to throw away like rubbish, is in fact on the decline in the USA.  Defence of womanhood and the preservation of the natural society are under serious attack.  Is the defence of the unborn, and the preservation of healthy and natural family structures Fascistic?  Certainly.  But part of the politically correct drive in the Obamanation of North America?  Hardly.  If anything, the US Establishment is hetero-phobic and controlled by militant homosexuals.  President Obama himself is a homosexual who enjoys receiving fellatio from white men.  He has staffed the White House with all manner of perverts.  Under his administration, the unborn are under attack like never before.  The destruction of marriage, the reduction of women from sacred mothers to wage slaves, and the rampant abortion on demand culture all stand in opposition to what is good for society.  Sorry Patin, but on this one you are very, very, wrong.

(8)  If Patin believes that the US regime has adopted a religious fervour, he may be correct.  However, his attempt to link the US Establishment with Christianity is an outright lie.  Yes, the regime do go on pilgrimages to the Holy Land, but not to Bethlehem or to Calvary; they go to the Wailing wall to insert bits of paper into a wall to ask the Jewish God for favours.  Patin has a point on this one; the government USA has abandoned the country's Christian heritage and now worships at the Synagogue of Satan.  Forgive me for stating the bleeding obvious, but Fascism was against the elevation of the Jews to gods over the Gentiles.  Naughty naughty Patin.  A good try, but this stinks of deception.

(11) Degenerate art is injurious to the soul of the people.  Decadent and sickening 'art' and sex-obsessed 'music', not to mention psychologically damaging filth from Hollywood and the Talmudic porn industry, are a part of the new USA.  Inspiring and invigorating real art are dismissed as old-fashioned and fascist, and have been condemned to the memory hole in Zionised countries such as the USA and UK.  Again Patin attacks something wholesome, which is exactly the strategy of the Establishment.

To turn to the remaining points, those in blue are quite subjective, and some are more misleading than others.

(2, 4, 7 & 12) Human Rights abuses and militarism?  Yes the rights of the people of the USA are being systematically undermined, and yes the country is becoming more militarised, but does this indicate that the country is under Fascist control?    The Fascist regimes 'abused' the Human Rights of the Freemasons by banning them, and also the rights of the enemies of the people, by interring them.  The US government attacks the right of people to worship, to speak their minds, to associate with and employ people of their own kind.  The abuses of the Obama regime are anti-Fascist.  As for militarism, military power obeys whoever orders it, and the ideology of the ruling power is of no relevance to the soldiers under their control.  Likewise for National Security and the Police State; these are administrative issues which can occur even under the most liberal of democracies, especially at times of war.

(3) The scape-goating of enemies in the USA is beyond scape-goating; the enemies highlighted by the media have been manufactured and are in many cases paid and controlled by the Establishment (e.g. Al CIAda).  This is a sneaky one from Mr Patin.  Here he tries to link the removal of Jews from positions of influence in Europe, with the attacks against Muslims by the US Government.  This sleight of hand brings images of the fake holocaust to mind, in which the Jews were moved to transit camps for their eventual relocation to Palestine, and significantly, to the USA.  The subject of the holocaust is too complex to go into here, but there is a wealth of information to indicate that the Jews were neither scape-goated (insofar as their leaders WERE and ARE at war with humanity), or gassed.  There is much information about this on the forum at this link.  For Patin to eagerly accept the 6 million canard and indeed to link it to the Zionist assault on Islam and Christianity is disingenuous to say the least.  Scape-goating is a characteristic of Zionist thinking, and was practised by the Talmudic rulers of the USSR to silence critics.  It is known today as political correctness, and there is nothing Fascistic about that.

(6) The media in the USA is controlled by the Zionist Internationale.  Under Fascism, the media has to serve the people by producing art, music and entertainment which is culturally enriching.  Control of information is an unfortunate reality in the Fascist system, and one of its points which is problematic.  A system of free media would of course be better for the people, but control always rests with the editors, owners and those who oversea the media as a whole.  In the USA there is such a thing as Public Service Broadcasting, which allows for anyone to speak as he or she feels.  This is a wonderful thing which those of us in fully controlled countries such as the UK, look to with admiration.  The advent of political correctness has undermined the freedom of the media, and the take-over of small-scale media by large international concerns has all but eradicated the free press.  What is left is online media such as this, and the Internet itself is under threat.  The power behind the erosion of freedom is associated with the Rothschilds, Murdoch, Reuters et al, all of whom are a part of the Zionist network.  A free media is a requisite of a free country, and Fascism fails this test.  However, to label the Zionisation of the western media as Fascist is a mistake.  I can see Patin's point here, but the correlation is messy, and does not stand up to scrutiny.

(9 & 10)  Patin refers to Corporatism, but fails to distinguish between the Corporatism of Mussolini, and the modern Corporatism which shares its name, but stands in diametrical opposition.  The Corporatism of Fascism binds together the workers and owners as a cooperative unit who work for the well being of the nation.  Workers' Rights are not undermined, but are enhanced as the workers are a part of the corporation, and not merely servants or employees.  This is the very basis of Fascism and Syndicalism, and Patin errs by linking it with the destructive money-worshipping international corporatism of today.  Under Fascism, there was no 'out-sourcing' to countries overseas, where as in international corporatism, out-sourcing to Communist China has reached the point where hardly anything in the USA (or EU) is made anywhere but China.  The point of the Corporate State was to rein-in the power of industry, in order to make it serve the people.  To this end, foreign ownership of the means of production, and the usurious practices of the stock market were forbidden.  Patin here labels the internationalist take-over of the economy as Fascistic.  It is as far removed from Fascism as is imaginable.

(13 & 14)  Corruption, Cronyism and Election Fraud are certainly rife in the USA.  Patin's attempt to label the government as Fascists due to their selfishness and promotion of kin and fellow parasites is intriguing.  Is he here trying to dirty the name of the Fascist movements by associating them with the decadent materialists of the modern age?  Elections were not fought according to party and the ability to throw money behind candidates who lied to gain office; parties were banned due to their divisive nature.  Comparing the two systems makes no sense, unless the objective is to dirty the name of one with the other.  Ironically Patin seeks to use Fascism to undermine the character of the gangsters in Congress, the Senate and the White house!  If only their level of corruption equalled that of the Fascists of bygone days.  As fallible as they were, they were saints in comparison with the vipers in power today.

All-in-all, Patin's attempt to use the Fascist epithet to attack the government of the USA, rests on the refusal of the people to take the time to study the truth behind the label.  Fascism was far from perfect, but it did provide a workable opposition to internationalism.  This is most likely why it is so often used to describe internationalism, and to thereby make people run from what could be a good defence against our developing enslavement.

The murder of femininity

In much of the western world, but especially the UK, the natural qualities of women are viewed as the result of male oppression, and in their place are subsituted harmful parodies of femininity, based upon ludicrous ideas of the supremacy of material gain, and an over-emphasis of physical attributes.  The attack on the feminine is rife throughout the Judaised west, as is evident in the media portrayal of women as whores or workaholics.  The natural role of a woman as mother and carer is mocked as a male construct, whereas in fact these traits are the fullest expressions of feminine beauty.

For girls growing up exposed to the western media, manufactured 'pop' music and the Hollywood film industry, the message is ceaselessly repeated: to succeed you must be a whore, and to be faithful to one man is to be old-fashioned (which of course, can never be allowed). 

Typical of the media obsession with sex as the key to success is an article in the Daily Mail, concerning the model Candice Swanepoel, who at 15 years of age (still a child) took a job as a semi-naked personality-less walking clothes horse, to shew her school bullies that she was better than them.  Really?  Regardless of whether she was bullied, the message to school girls is that by exposing one's flesh, one can achieve material gain, and therefore by the acquisition of wealth, be a better person than those who do not go down this route.  With this logic, is it any wonder that girls are getting pregnant at ever earlier ages?  To be a sex object is to be popular.  This is nothing short of the promotion of prostitution, and pædophilia.

On television and in films, sex is promoted as the be-all and end-all of human achievement.  The notion that it is ok for a girl to be promiscuous, because boys are, is childish logic which sits alongside the 'he started it' argument.  It is not ok for anyone to be promiscuous!  Of course the whole anti-feminine movement is Talmudic in origin with the sick and twisted 'eye for an eye' ideology; which fails to address the wisdom of mutual blinding.

Brought up in an atmosphere in which ideals are mocked, and instant gratification is the model, it is only to be expected that a considerable number of girls will adopt the negative lifestyle of the manufactured role models.  Television programmes such as Sex and the City debase women.  Women are naturally sexual beings, but are much more as well.  The gossip media's preoccupation with divorce and adultery effectively normalises the abnormal.  Girls are taught that they must experiment with lesbianism and that it would be evil to not 'date' outside one's own race.  Homosexuality and ethnic identity destruction are added to the litany of horrors with which children, and girls in particular, are assaulted.

The music industry no longer focuses upon talent, but upon debauchery.  The likes of Beyonce and Avril Lavigne who began their careers singing about virtue and even opposing the sexualisation of music, have now joined the flesh-fest which encourages girls to be unpaid whores.  To succeed as a 'celebrity' one must be willing to sleep one's way to the top.  This instruction is repeated in every aspect of the celebrity-worshipping culture, and so honour and faithfulness have suffered.

When vacant individuals who become rich and famous for no other reason than having the dubious talent for having promiscuous sex and exposing  their bodies, become role models, all is not well with society.  The tendency of celebrities to marry, then within weeks divorce, makes a mockery of marriage.  When this attack on marriage is joined by government as in the pro-homosexual London regime, it is time to take notice of what is obviously an orchestrated assault on decency.

In the UK we have the ridiculous EDL.  This group of thugs like to misquote the Qur'an and to focus on the fake Islamic sect created by the Talmudist, Abd al-Wahhab.  The primary reason that the multi-culti EDL hate Islam is the fidelity of Muslim women to their husbands, and their modest dress.  Indeed, if Muslim girls would only dress like whores and have sex with the disgusting vermin of the EDL, they would have no problem with Islam!  The EDL have swallowed the Talmudic lie that the women of Christian Europe are, and have always been, shiksas.  Certainly the type of female who will have sex with an EDL thug does merit the label shiksa, but such damaged goods are not representative of English women in general, which must irk the scum of the EDL.

It is only since the judaisation of the UK became endemic after the slaughter of the UK's finest in two Zionist World Wars, that femininity came under serious attack.  European women have always been honoured by their men folk.  Motherhood is a noble and rewarding vocation which no form of employment can rival.  The labelling of motherhood as a chore which denies a woman her freedom is pure evil.  Only by breaking real families can the Talmudic destruction of the Goyim be achieved.  Getting girls to behave as unpaid prostitutes acclimatises them to a belief that promiscuity is normal and faithfulness is a perversion.  This tragic phenomenon has only become so prevalent through the concerted effort of the Talmudist in government and their kin in the media and entertainment industry.  It is not the norm, nor ever has been.

In traditional Europe, women dressed modestly and wore little or no make-up.  An unjudaised European woman has more in common with a Muslim woman as far as dress and fidelity are concerned, than with the damaged image-obsessed girls and women of our current unfortunate times.  If the EDL were really concerned with defending England, they would be campaigning for the outlawing of pornography, the protection of marriage (real marriage between one man and one woman), the punishment of adultery (by either party), the treatment of homosexuals, and the adoption of modest dress by men and women alike.  Instead they defend perversion and campaign for all women to dress and act as low-class call girls, regardless of faith, marital status, or age ( like the pædophile Simon Sheppard, they like 'em young).

England has the disadvantage of not having a distinct National Dress, unlike most of Europe, including our neighbours in Scotland, and Wales (including Kernow and Brittany).  An English National Dress would help to reconnect us with our ancestors, and it is perhaps indicative of the despotism of the internationalist mafia who comprise the Establishment, that our culture has been assaulted more than the rest of the UK or the territories occupied under the Talmudic 'royal' banner.

Femininity should be cherished.  We need to protect our children from exposure to popular 'culture'. In the 1970s and 1980s there was a woman named Mary Whitehouse, who campaigned against degeneracy.  She was vilified by the media, but if anything her campaigns were soft on our enemies.  In her days there were only three (later four) television channels in the UK (none operating 24 hours per day), there was no Internet, and films could only be seen on television or at a cinema.  The debilitating influence of the media is now much worse than in Whitehouse's day, thus avoiding exposure is much harder.  In Whitehouse's time, political correctness was confined to rabid Marxists and not the norm as it is now.  Our struggle is hard but that is no excuse for surrendering without a fight.  There is an 'off' button on the television - use it!

A concerted attack on femininity is underway.  All of us who cherish family, morality, and all which the internationalists seek to eradicate, are duty-bound to expose the corruption of our children, especially girls, and to do all in our power to push back the influence of the enemy.  We may not be able to stop the filth getting on television etc, but we can stop it getting into our homes.  Vermin like the EDL will always exist, but we can highlight their hypocrisy and distance ourselves from their odious internationalist propaganda.  

By educating our children with decency, and a sense of worth which doesn't require material rewards or the approval of those who have absorbed the toxin of feminism, we can make a difference to our kin.  And in the end, the fight against internationalism is a fight for our nearest and dearest.  We are on the long journey to victory over the global enemy, and to paraphrase the Chinese philosopher Laozi, every journey begins with the first step.

Propranolol: A Drug to Silence Free Thoughts

Internationalism dictates that there must be uniformity in all measurements for all commodities.  This standardisation of all products and devices includes not only man-made products, but also that which occurs in nature.  To shew just exactly how the ruling Establishment see the ordinary people of the world, we are also considered as goods which have to be uniform.  The ridiculous regulations which define how curved a banana must be are well known.  What is becoming ever more apparent, is that there are also standardising rules for humans.

Human beings are not the same.  We are all different, and it is our differences which make the world an interesting place in which to live.  Alike to other species, we do have identifiable breeds; each forming an extended family of people who share traits which they do not share with members of differing breeds in different extended families.  We use the word race to identify each breed, and it is a descriptive term which is value-neutral.  However, for the Establishment, the existence of different races is an obstacle to their goal of a world of standardised beings devoid of loyalties and bonds to anything of worth.  Different races express different cultures, and hold on to non-material values which the Establishment cannot control.  That which they cannot own, they destroy.

For decades, we have been subjected to media lies through radio and television to the effect that there is no such thing as race, and that the physiological differences between people from different parts of the world are only 'skin deep'.  This is nonsense; the physiological differences are indicators of far greater psychological peculiarities which cannot be observed by the five senses.

The media have pushed the notion that those who believe in the existence of race are motivated by hatred of others.  In the case of those who believe in the Chosen People myth, this is very true.  Interestingly, those who see themselves as superior to everyone else, are the first to cry 'racism' when the 'lower races' dare to question them. 

Most people are motivated by love of their families, and by extension their racial family; the nation.  Hollywood has tried to create a subculture of knuckle-scrapers who hate people because of the colour of their skin, but there are very few people who have bought into this nonsense.  The natural tendency to treat others as one would wish to be treated is particularly a trait of Europeans, who have ironically been labelled as supremacists and 'haters' by those who do not understand our psyche by virtue of not being part of our family.  The likes of the EDL had to be created by the Establishment, and when one examines it, its overt anti-Islamic stance  masks a covert multi-culti agenda.  Sincere individuals, not of the Talmudic upbringing, who genuinely hate others due to race and race alone, are exceptional, and in no way representative of the European mindset.

Although staged fake 'racial hatred' groups have failed to gain currency and remained largely staffed by undercover police operatives and politically-motivated agents provocateur, the media have ceaselessly defamed Europeans to suit the agenda of their controllers.  In recent times, the bogeyman of the European racist out to 'get' the Blacks etc, has been joined by the dæmonised Muslim, hell-bent of the annihilation of the Jews.  These Media and Establishment-created stereotypes have to be reinforced by false flag attacks on ordinary civilians.  By and large, the European expression of hostility to others tends to be within the race.  This trait has been exploited to allow for self-hating, bolshevised Whites, to wreak havoc on our own people.

In tandem with the media onslaught on all that is wholesome in looking after one's own kin, is the legal assault.  In the UK, it is a criminal offence to have an opinion which differs from that which is deemed politically correct by the Zionised Establishment.  Many people have been arrested under the Public Order Act (1986), for such 'crimes' as talking about facts of history in a manner which isn't wholly in agreement with the official propaganda.  Having literature which discusses the biological nature of race can lead to one's arrest, and presumably to the offending books being burned.

Human beings are stubborn creatures, and to the horror of those who would be our masters, we have refused to drop down and worship the new Gods of the One World State.  As is to be expected, the snide propagandists have another weapon in their arsenal.  As their TV propaganda and legal persecution still isn't working, they are now set to classify pride in one's own culture, and respect for others, as a mental illness.  

Ironically, it is the same deviants who promote as normal real mental illnesses such as homosexuality, who now seek to classify those who oppose internationalism as mentally impaired 'racists'.  They have a 'cure' for those afflicted by freedom of speech and thought; it is called Propranolol. Just as the Talmudic regime which took over Russia labelled 'politically incorrect' dissidents as suffering mental illness, so the Talmudic regimes in London and Washington are to do likewise. 

It was in the USSR that the term Politically Correct was coined.  It was also in the USSR that mass medication was used to keep the people docile.  Fluoridation of the water supply of inmates detained for opposition to the regime, was a useful tool for preventing a genuine revolution to throw off the Wall Street-installed Jews such as Lenin & Trotsky.  The modern Talmudists who control the UK have used sodium fluoride in swathes of the country, adding it to the general water supply; not just to those classed as criminals, aswas the case in the USSR.  Clearly everyone in the UK is viewed as a criminal by the Establishment.

There are plans underway to add Propranolol to the water supply to suppress thoughts which acknowledge the existence of race.  As it is evident that the multi-culti experiment isn't working, the democratic thing to do is to reverse the policies which led to mass immigration; such as destroying the homelands of those who have to emigrate, and giving immigrants preferential treatment with regards to access to work, education, healthcare, benefits etc ad nauseum.  Of course the well-being of the people is not the priority of the politicians, who only feign to care what the people think during the farcical spectacles we call elections.  To class those who do not agree with your opinions as mentally ill, is to exhibit, paranoia, mania, dellusions of grandeur and persecution, and, well, is to exhibit symptoms of mental illness!

Thankfully there is a cure for the megalomaniacs who misrule us on behalf of the hidden global elite.  We can and must disengage from their rule.  They take their power from us, and we must ensure we do not give it to them.  Should they persist in their plans to poison our water, it is only right that they should be the first to benefit from the toxification of one of life's essential requirements.  Of course, as they are the only ones who favour it, let them drink it all.  If they drown in the process, then the removal of one type of poluting filth from our planet by another, would be poetic justice indeed.

Those who seek the obliteration of racial differences, also seek the obliteration of culture, normal monogamous faithful sexuality, culture, spiritual awareness, and all which makes us human.  Propranolol is not the first pharmaceutical to be developed which has the ability to manipulate people's personalities, and if unoppose it won't be the last.  Every time we fail to object and to act against our enemies, they take our silence and inaction as tacit approval.  We are being herded towards a world in which we are nothing but cattle for the rulers to feed on and use as they see fit.  Are you a Goy, or are you Human?  Doing nothing will allow the Establishment to answer that question for you, and when you are pharmaceutically shackled, it will be too late to make a stand; as you won't be able to.  

The battle for our survival and advancement is now, not at some later time when it is more convenient.  Do something today.  Make a difference.  Tomorrow is always too late.