Feminism: Enslaving women and abolishing femininity

What is Feminism?  Looking at the word, it must surely be something to do with celebrating the female, and all that is feminine, right?  Well, no, it isn't.  Then what else can it be?  If it isn't a celebration of the wonders of the female, then what can it be?  Feminism is a classic example of double-speak; it is no less than a crusade to destroy the female.

Feminists start with the premise that women are oppressed by male society.  They argue that it is an act of oppression which sees men killing themselves with heavy manual labour, whilst women are encouraged to undertake physically less demanding work than men, or to stay at home and look after the family.  What feminists fail to appreciate is that men and women are built differently and have different qualities to one another.  According to feminists, men and women are exactly the same, and so should be treated as such.  To anyone who has ever encountered a member of the opposite sex, the notion that we are no different is ludicrous.

Early Feminists argued that it was wrong that only men were allowed to cast meaningless votes for political parties who would ignore their promises upon election.  They side-stepped the fact that only men from the ruling class were allowed to take part in the sham democratic system.  After years of campaigning, universal suffrage was introduced, leading to the current situation where every drooling buffoon who can make a cross on a ballot paper, can vote.  Rather than demand that the fraudulent democracy be overturned, and a system of government be introduced to run the country by virtue of expertise, rather than by how convincingly one could smile at the electorate, the feminists and their fellow travellers, extended the already failed system to become the ochlocratic charade we endure today.  Thanks for that.

Having secured the survival of the fake democratic system, and prevented its replacement with rule by an educated elite who would have governed according to their specialised expertise, the feminists set about abolishing the family.  Why?  Because, apparently it is degrading for a woman to be a mother, and to look after her husband and home!  Absolute nonsense!  Motherhood is one of the hardest but most important tasks anyone could undertake.  To belittle the contribution to the nation of those who raise the next generation is sheer lunacy.  Lunacy it may be, but again, the feminists scored a victory, and now children are seen by many as a burden, to be dispatched to strangers in nurseries and schools as soon as it is practicable.  Marriage became old-fashioned, and so children without Fathers became more prevalent.  The bastardised society inevitably became the greater broken home, wracked by crime and disorder - exactly as those behind the feminist movement planned.

Bolstering the fraudulent rule of the despots, breaking the family, wrecking marriage, destroying children, turning women into unpaid whores and unborn child-killers  - all theses objectives of feminism were achieved under the banner of liberation from oppression; but the lunacy did not end there.

Women were told that it was their right to be producer-consumers, and that the men who protected them from wage-slavery were their oppressors.  Thus women joined the workforce, and in order to compete with men in male environments, had to become caricatures of men.  Feminist propaganda describes men as cruel, manipulative and deceitful, thus women infected with feminism believe they have to become that way, only moreso.  Patience, empathy, compassion, and all other virtues are decried by feminists as weaknesses resulting from subjugation to patriarchal oppression; all that matters is the pursuit of money, which has to be undertaken in the manner of an individualistic brute.  Some men fit the caricature, but most do not.  Those who have have had female bosses of the feminist variety will know how unfeminine these creatures can be, and how unpleasant they are to work for.

Women have qualities which should be nurtured and developed.  Feminism denies the innate qualities which women tend to have.  Thankfully only a minority of women have bought the feminist lie in its entirety, but the ones that have are a menace, thrusting their mendacity on all who are exposed to them.  The impact of feminism has been profound, as most women have adopted some parts of the insane ideology.   Lesbianism, is of course, another feminist victory, and a dead end for its victims.

Feminism has been a negative force which has wrecked the countries in which it has been allowed to take hold.  Such is the power of the feminist media that women have become conditioned to view all who defend their natural right to be feminine, (and to be protected from the harsh masculine domain), as enemies and oppressors.   What is oppressive about wishing to empower a woman to raise her own children without the intervention of the State?  What is oppressive about taking on the male role of bread-winner and provider, so that the woman is free to fulfil her natural role as nurturer?  What is oppressive about a husband being a husband?

In the natural society, the relationship between men and women is complimentary, not competitive.  Each has his or her own abilities and qualities which together are mutually beneficial.  Feminism is the Trojan horse which has ruined our lands under the guise of a movement for emancipation.  Feminism is a lie, and the sooner it is consigned to history, the sooner our people will be free.  Equality which reduces the people to servitude, is the ultimate tyranny.

Society is drowning in pornography

A reader asked me if I watch pornography.  I do not, but I would be lying if I said that I have never seen any. I think that in our decadent society, it has become something of a rite of passage for boys to get hold of a porno video and some beer and go through the awkward and embarrassing ordeal of pretending to be more experienced than they really are.  I think for boys, porn provides information which can be used to more plausibly lie to your friends about how far you have gone with girls, when in fact you are still innocent. Watching porn is like smoking, or drinking underage - it is supposed to make you more grown up, but really just damages your health.

Hollywood and television push the idea that children who watch porn, drink and smoke are more grown up than those who don't - and that being grown up is all that matters. Perhaps having fallen prey to the damaging power of television when a teenager is why I am so opposed to watching television these days, and to watching all negative films etc, which has to include porn.

I am not an angel by any means, and I have at times been a part of the herd. As I wrote in yesterday's article, freeing oneself is the hardest battle, and a very hard battle it is indeed. I used to watch television soap operas to the point of addiction (yes, even Coronation Street). Soaps tell you what to do; porn tells you how to treat members of the opposite sex. In both cases the propaganda is woefully wrong. Soaps are now semi-pornographic in content, so the decadence and selfishness of the porn industry, is now fused with the social engineering of the entertainment industry.  This is not good.

Pornography teaches that it is OK to have sex with absolutely anyone, and that there is absolutely no need to know the individual one is having sex with.  From a male perspective, this reduces all females to the position of objects to ejaculate into/over.  Pornography has been a key influence in the sexualisation of society.  The sexualised society has no barriers of decency.  Adultery has become normalised, with marriage offering no protection from sexual predators, or indeed the wedding ring preventing the individual from having extra-marital sex.  I have stated that I am no angel, and that I have made grave mistakes in my life, but adultery is not one of them.  I find myself in a shrinking minority, as marriage vows become meaningless.

Porn and the entertainment media have been used to destroy the institution of marriage.  The printed media are awash with stories of infidelity, and with ridiculous 'celebrity' marriages which last for a few months, before the couple part and then re-marry or shack-up with other people of various hues and sexes.  The message such celebrity behaviour sends is that marriage is only for as long as it is convenient, and that divorce is no big deal.  This has led to many people not bothering to marry at all, and drifting from one sexual relationship to another; often with clandestine sexual encounters interspersed along the way.  Marriage is a lifelong commitment which must be one of absolute monogamy, but for many people (probably most people in the UK) the probability of one spouse 'cheating' on the other is very high.

Television programmes such as 90210 concentrate on stories of children 'shagging' one another, and on the need to be rich and popular.  I haven't seen any more up-to-date television, but I can only assume the emphasis on sex and materialism has increased rather than decreased.  Children are even more susceptible to the harmful influence of film and television than adults, which is why such media are becoming increasingly hard to distinguish from soft porn - and why pornography is becoming ever more extreme and mechanical.

I used to watch Emmerdale Farm with its stories about farming and rural Yorkshire.  I stopped watching it when it became Emmerdale, and the farming folk were replaced by bed-hopping urbanites.  I wasted a lot of precious time glued to the idiot box, but that time did at least allow me to witness the deterioration of television and the merger of the entertainment industry with soft porn. 

One only has to look at the music industry to see how far our society has fallen; whereas music was once an uplifting influence, it is now a sex-fest with the likes of Lady Gaga promoting homosexuality and Rhianna promoting sado-masochism.  All modern music, of course, promotes miscegenation.  'Pop' music is a tool of the social engineers which is used to break down barriers to internationalism; barriers of decency, fidelity, heterosexuality, family, ethnic identity, culture, tradition, and all that is wholesome.  Pop music  has become porn music.

The taxation system in the UK punishes families.  The welfare system actively encourages women to have children out of wedlock, and to raise their children without the father(s).  The deification of selfishness, materialism, and sex for fun (1960s-spawned hippy free-love, man), are all reinforced by the propaganda that the only person who matters is oneself.  To destroy a society, the building blocks must be broken.  Creating the idea that monogamy and family are old-fashioned and oppressive, has been a key objective of the internationalists; pornography has pushed this agenda to the point where morality is mocked.  The likes of the EDL who demand the right of Muslim women to dress like prostitutes, are a fine example of the mind-rotting effect of the sexualised society.  Islam has no place in Europe, but the belief expressed by liberal-reactionaries who promote the idea that it is a woman's 'right' to dress and behave as a whore, is outrageous.

Pornography has no place in a healthy society.  In Franco's Spain, pornography was illegal, but brothels were not.  There will always be men who are prepared to pay for sex, and men who are unable to have a meaningful relationship.  In the UK, pornography is everywhere, yet prostitution is illegal.  The result is that men have become overwhelmed by sexual imagery and due to the dehumanising quality of porn, feel they have a right to sex when they want it.  In the clubs and bars across the UK, it is common for men to go out with the express aim of having anonymous sex with anyone who will let them.  Women are just as bad as men in this regard.  This has led to a destruction of monogamy and marriage.  

For some men, the constant sexual imagery in the media has created the idea that they can get sex when they want, and when this isn't the case, a minority of men become rapists.  In Franco's Spain, children were not exposed to porn on the television, in music, and in the 'sex education' lessons at school, and women were far less in danger of being raped than in the decadent and diseased liberal mess of the UK.  Of course to praise Franco's prohibition of pornography is to invite screams of 'Fascist!' from the liberal lunatics who run the UK asylum, and who presumably think that the sexualisation of children, spread of homosexuality, and increase in rape, is fine, as these phenomena are a part of the diverse and enriching multi-culti international slave state where sex and possessions are all that matter.  When the internationalists speak of enrichment, they fail to mention that it is the Establishment who become materially enriched as we become spiritually and culturally impoverished  The protection of nation, family, culture, and decency, is anathema to our would-be rulers and their liberal puppets.

Pornography is destructive to the mind of the individual, and to society at large.  Not only must pornography of the 'mucky mag' and sex shop variety be avoided, but also the far more invasive everyday pornography of the Daily Mail/Sun/Star etc, TV Soaps, Hollywood 'Romantic Comedies' etc, and the entire media and education system.  At the risk of inviting howls of liberal indignation, Franco was right.  It is far better that legalised prostitution in areas remote from the public exists to cater for those who cannot find a suitable spouse, than for all of society to be turned into a sexual free-for-all, in which children are targeted as customers for the filth industry.  Give me the protection of El Caudillo over the pollution of the Jewish porn-lords any day!  Do we really need to see the promotion of promiscuity and degenearcy every time we walk down a street with billboards?  Wouldn't a return to the natural society of morality and mental health be much better?

Anti-Pope Ratzinger deifies money

Joseph Ratzinger is not the Pope.  Although he uses the title, and calls himself Benedict XVI, by his deeds he can clearly be seen as an anti-Pope who occupies the papacy for the sole purpose of undermining Christianity.

Ratzinger was a key architect of Vatican II.  The transformation of the Church between 1962 and 1965 opened the doors for the destruction of Christianity.  Under Ratzinger, the heresies of Vatican II have taken root in more fundamental ways than even under the papacy of John Paul II.  Ratzinger often is seen carrying the bent cross, which for Catholics has serious diabolical connotations.  

Ratzinger's most disturbing actions against Christianity included his declaration that the First Covenant is still valid and that Jews do not have to recognise the divinity of Christ to achieve salvation.  This declaration effectively called Christ a liar, and accepted the Talmudic lunacy that Jews are a special Chosen People, who have a right to rule over the rest of humanity by virtue of being God's creations (whereas non-Jews are just animals (Goyim)).  Ratzinger speaks more as a Rabbi than a Christian.

There has been much talk of Ratzinger being a member of the Hitler Youth, but this is an irrelevance.  Every child in Germany during the Third Reich had to join a youth organisation.  For girls this was the Bund Deutscher Mädel, for boys it was the Deutsches Jungvolk and the Hitlerjugend.  Ratzinger was automatically enrolled in the Hitler Youth and briefly served as an assistant to the Luftwaffe, before deserting and making his way to the advancing Americans.  Just as Ratzinger has betrayed Christianity, he was also a traitor to Germany.

The latest anti-Christian move of the Rat, is to reintroduce Plenary Indulgences to the Church.  The idea of Indulgences is that if one does something of merit, one will be rewarded in Heaven.  This seems fair enough, but where Ratzinger oversteps what is reasonable is in categorising giving money to the Church as a meritorious act.  Of course, charitable donations are worthy, but the scope for abuse in allowing people to effectively buy forgiveness for sins is absurd.  Ratzinger's move opens the Church up to accusations of corruption such, comparable with those which shattered Christian unity at the time of the Reformation.  Ratzinger is no fool, so just who is he serving by making decisions which hold the Church up to ridicule?

Responsibility for the despicable crime of child abuse committed by Priests can in part be laid at the foot of the modernisers in the Church.  Vatican II opened up the Church for the entry of closet homosexual priests.  The new lax approach to religion of the modernisers allowed the perversions of the Talmudists to enter territory to which they had previously been subject to such scrutiny that they could not remain long before being dealt with.  The sick and depraved men who have caused so much harm to young boys, can accurately be described as the spiritual sons of Vatican II.  The harm done to the innocents raped by Ratzinger's modern Priests has brought the entire Catholic Church into disrepute, and for those who have stayed silent, quite rightly so.  Those who allowed the abuse of children to go unpunished in the name of appearing 'modern' are beneath contempt.

Ratzinger is soft on pædophiles, is pro-Jewish, is a High Priest of modernity, and embraces internationalism to the point of calling for a global government with a global currency.  Yet, is spite of all these heinous anti-Christian tendencies, there are people who seek to label him as the archetypal Catholic, and to twist his brief mandatory membership of the Hitler Youth into something sinister.  Ratzinger was a traitor to his country in his youth, and he is a traitor to humanity in his adulthood.  His emphasis on money as the route to salvation would make him at home in the Synagogue; this puts him in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ he purports to uphold.

Now a boy in the UK thinks he's a girl!

Following on from the deranged 78-year old James Rose who thinks he is a woman and is going to be genitally mutilated when he is 80, comes revelation that there are boys in the UK who want to have their penises lopped off.

Jack Green is a typically boy, with big hands and feet, and a male jawline.  He is a homosexual pervert who has a boyfriend.  And like all homosexuals he is mentally damaged.  Jack's claim to shame is that he is the youngest boy in the UK to have his penis surgically removed, having been mutilated at the age of 16.  

Jack's diseased mind expresses itself in an outward display of egomania.  Not only does the teenage boy like to wear frocks, and be buggered, but he also thinks he is beautiful, and as a result of his self-obsession, he is entering the Miss England contest!  Such is the politically bamboozled nature of England, that the mentally-ill boy in lipstick has been allowed to enter, and has been given publicity by the UK media.

Unlike James Rose who is old enough to make stupid and selfish decisions, Jack Green was mutilated when only 16.  His unfit mother has applauded this move.  If anyone needed proof that the UK is a basket case, run by lunatics for the benefit of deviants and criminals, this is it.  Jack's mother isn't fit to look after dogs, let alone children.  The UK is becoming the global centre for child abuse and exploitation of the mentally ill - and the media celebrate it.

Asian Rape Gang groom White Children - Police say it isn't racist!

Not far from where I live, across the Pennines in Rochdale, the above eight Pakistani rapists are due for sentencing for grooming White girls.  A ninth man from Afghanistan is also charged with the same offence.  These rapists follow on from over 60 other Pakistani rapists who have also been convicted for grooming White children.  In every case, the perpetrators are Pakistanis, Afghans or other Muslims from Asia, and in every case, the victims are White.  The Greater Manchester Police have declared that these bastards who prey on indigenous children, and never on Muslim ones, are not racist! 

The 'men' who have perpetrated the latest offences are:

• Kabeer Hassan, 25, of Lacrosse Avenue, Oldham, who was also convicted of one count of rape

• Abdul Aziz, 41, of Armstrong Hurst Close, Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking for sexual exploitation

• Abdul Rauf, 43, of Darley Road and Adil Khan, 42, of Oswald Street, both of Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking a child within the UK for sexual exploitation

• Mohammed Sajid, 35, of Jephys Street, Rochdale, also convicted of one count of rape, sexual activity with a girl under 16 and trafficking for sexual exploitation

• Mohammed Amin, 45, of Falinge Road, Falinge, also convicted of sexual assault

• Hamid Safi, 22, of Tweedale Street, Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking girls for the purposes of sexual exploitation

• Abdul Qayyum, 44, of Ramsay Street, Rochdale

All eight of the above are Pakistani; all of them Muslim; all the victims White and indigenous; Police say race is not involved!

Where I live, we have gangs of rapists who get White girls hooked on heroin and crack cocaine, and make them pay for the drugs by turning them to prostitution.  There is a girl in my area who was snared into this despicable life when she was 10 years old.  Sadly this isn't unusual.  In the case in court today, the girls were given drugs and forced to have sex.  When they refused, they were beaten.

The laughing liberal lunatics who made much of the EDL member who used the word Muslamic for Islamic, and spoke of 'Muslamic' Rape Gangs, are busy apologising for the Muslim rapists.  Instead of being honest about a serious problem the liberal mafia are looking for excuses to turn the blame onto society as a whole, and the girls themselves.

Link to video: http://youtu.be/pb9L8feiY5w

We all know that the police are racist scum who enforce the anti-indigenous agenda with the zeal typical of traitors. There have been ridiculous prosecutions of Whites for offences such as racially aggravated revving of a car, yet when White children are specifically targeted for rape and drug addiction, the police turn a blind eye.  The police are accomplices to every case of anti-White child abuse, rape etc perpetrated by Asians, which will come in the wake of this decision to label the abuse of White children as no big deal.

The Labour MP, Keith Vaz, himself a Muslim, has all-but pronounced that White girls ask for abuse, as they are easy; slags; asking for it.  This is the joy of multi-culturalism and the Zionisation of England.  The schools and the State Broadcaster (BBC) teach political correctness to children.  They teach that children must be sexually active, and must experiment with sex with everyone they can get it from - male , female, black, white, animal, vegetable etc.  Propaganda such as the BBC News, Eastenders etc teach that the worst offence in the world is 'racism', thus refusing sex with non-Whites is a racist offence.  Sections of the Muslim community who believe that is is acceptable to rape non-Muslims are not the only ones to blame for these offences; the liberal Establishment who created multi-culturalism and the concept of 'racism' are equally, nay more responsible for the destruction of the lives of White children.

I worked with a Pakistani man who beat his sister so badly that she required hospital treatment.  His justification was that she was in a relationship with a White man.  He worked alongside me in a job which required a full enhanced disclosure of any criminal offences and arrests.  He was not dismissed from the public service; he was not punished at all.  If he had been White and he had beaten his sister for having a relationship with a Pakistani, he would still be in prison!  Again, the police and the State decided that his crime wasn't racially motivated, although it couldn't have been anything but!

On BBC Radio 5 this morning, the Rochdale crimes were discussed, and all manner of excuses brought out to make the anti-White crimes appear to not be racially motivated.  There are many Chinese, African and Indian (Hindu) girls in southern Lancashire (so-called Greater Manchester), yet only indigenous White girls were targeted.  How more racially motivated does this need to be for the police to treat anti-indigenous crimes as racist?

People have been prosecuted for comments on Twitter or Facebook which have been construed as racist.  The failure of the police to treat the preying on White children as the racially-motivated crimes they are, is sickening.  They deserve the epithet filth, although to call them pigs is unkind to the animals who far exceed them in intelligence and decency.

On the BBC programme, an Imam working in Keighley claimed that the reason for the grooming of White girls is that the poorly done to Asian men have sexually unfulfilled arranged marriages, and thereby have no alternative but to use White girls, who are easy and available.  If this is the case, then surely the presence of people who have a religion and culture which puts our children in danger, should be kept out of our country?  No?  This is another example of the enriching quality of multi-culturalism, and, (we are told) we must learn to live with it!!

The solution to grooming, and all sex offences is to abandon the sexualisation of children in the media and State 'education' system, and to treat children as children.  In a word we must reverse the politically correct policies of government, and expel those who have sought to undermine our culture and our way of life.  Many of those who are responsible for the destruction of our land could go to Israel to wallow in their insanity.  As for the Muslim colonies, they have no reason to be here and should be relocated to Pakistan etc.  If we will not stand up and speak out in defence for our children for fear of being labelled as thought criminals, then what will we stand up for?

No doubt the politically-motivated police reading this will consider defence of the indigenous population as 'racist', whereas attacks against us our not!  That just shews how debased the police are, and that they form a occupation force for the destruction of Europe.  Traitors throughout history have earned the same fate.  If the police continue to persecute their own people, sooner or later they will reap what they have sewn.  So coppers - are you going to continue betraying your people, or will you wake up and fight for us?  You choose your fate by your deeds.

Nation-wrecking BBC lauds mentally-ill 78 year old 'sex changer'

Just when you thought the BBC couldn't get any more embarrassingly politicised, it drops to previously unimaginable depths.  On the BBC Radio 5 Victoria Derbyshire programme, a 78 year old man with mental health issues was allowed to humiliate his family by professing to be a woman trapped inside a man's body.  

During the nauseating spectacle (which you can listen to here), James Rose was given air time to describe how he has studied the differences between men and women, and has now come to the conclusion that he is in fact a woman, and so, even though he is 78 years old, he is going to be sexually mutilated to remove his penis.

The Father of three, and Grandfather of four, spoke in a typically deep male voice about his fantasies of being female, and rather than suggest the aged gentleman seek help from psychiatric professionals, the politically correct interviewer, Derbyshire, insisted throughout the programme in calling him Ruth.  She even went so far as to berate a listener for referring to James as a man, which is of course what he is.

The notion that gender is a social construct is pure liberal nonsense.  It fits in with the idea that we are all the same under the skin and that visible physiological differences are of no importance.  This is itself really quite offensive as it belittles the innate qualities of men and women, and of the diverse nations of humanity.  

To the liberal-materialist mind, people are basically the same, with no outstanding characteristics, and nothing of merit to distinguish them from the other producing-consuming featherless bipeds who roam the Earth.  As we are all the same, our focus can only be on acquisition of material goods and physical survival, as, (so the materialists would have it), culture, race, spirituality, tradition, gender, intellect, etc are all social constructs which exist to oppress us, and we will all be better off when these things are gone and we can all be self-obsessed hedonists devoid of the real essence of humanity.  This bleak view is the liberal utopia.  Thank you, but no thanks.

James Rose is set to have his penis removed next year when he will be 80 years old.  Up until now his disorder has been limited to cross-dressing.  Mr Rose spoke of how his children are unhappy about him sliding into a world of self-absorption in which his foibles have become so important to him that he is unable to consider the feelings of his children.  He is not allowed to see his grandchildren due to his children taking the necessary, but doubtless heart-rending step, of keeping him away from them for their own protection.  For a man to wilfully separate himself from his own flesh and blood due to a fetish, is proof that the poor man needs help, not molly-coddling and encouragement.

Mr Rose spoke at length about how he studies the way women hold their heads, walk, talk etc, and tries to emulate them.  If he really was a woman, he wouldn't have to study feminine characteristics, as he would already have them.  The fact that he can identify the distinguishing traits which differentiate men from women gives proof to the innate existence of theses differences.  His own studies prove that he is a man.  He may be a man who likes to play at dressing up, and more than likely gets sexual pleasure from his transvestism, but he is a man nonetheless.

There have always been transvestites.  There have always been homosexuals.  There have always been pædophiles.  In the case of fetishists, be it those who like to dress up in rubber, latex, clothes of the opposite sex, bondage, or whatever, so long as their kinkiness remains in the bedroom and remains between consenting adults of the opposite sex, it doesn't harm anyone.  Many men like women to wear high heels as it alters the shape of the calf muscle.  Many women find uniforms arousing due to their association with masculine and brave men such as firemen.  These could be called fetishes of sorts, but they are harmless.  Homosexuality and pædophilia are harmful to everyone involved, and in the case of Mr Rose, his particular quirk has crossed from the realm of the peculiar into that which is dangerous. 

Why are there now more sexual deviants than ever before?  We ingest hormones in our food from livestock which has been subjected to growth altering drugs.  Our water supplies have been contaminated with hormones from the contraceptive pill.  The mass use of airborne chemicals in industry, and of pharmaceuticals, all have impacted upon our physical and mental health.  The changes we see in puberty, with girls starting their periods at ever younger ages, are not natural, but a result of irresponsible industrial practices which have contaminated the very air we breath and the food we eat with toxins which are detrimental to our health.  The increase in illness produced by the modern era of selfish and uncaring multi-nationals conglomerates does not only manifest in cancers, heart disease etc, but also in mental illness such as that suffered by men who think they are women.

The BBC programme was typical of what one would expect from the State broadcaster.  The British Establishment is a central part of the international cabal which seeks the destruction of difference, in order to create a uniform world of mindless materialists.  For such people, men and women are the same, and it is therefore merely an enhanced form of cosmetic surgery to change the physical appearance of one into the other.

un-necessary surgery does not help.

In a sane world, there would be laws forbidding the contamination of the food chain by pharmaceutical corporations; health care would be focused upon treating illnesses, not masking symptoms with drugs; those responsible for industrial pollution such as the BP atrocity in the Gulf of Mexico would be dealt with in the harshest possible ways (rather than covering-up their crimes, and even as in the case of BP, orchestrating the invasion of Libya to replace BP's lost profits); mental and physical health would be considered as a whole and not used for political purposes; men such as Mr Rose would be helped back to normality rather than condemned to travel further into insanity.

I feel sorry for Mr Rose, and especially for his family.  He has been used by the BBC as a poster boy for the Establishment's attack on the natural society.  If he survives the operation, he will have the physical appearance of a woman (a very tall woman with big hands!), but he will still be a man, and no amount of surgery or media propaganda will change that.

Establishment Pædophiles sexualising children

The UK Establishment grows more degenerate by the day.  Having pushed for an ever lower age of consent, and equality for buggery alongside healthy and natural sex, the perverts in power are now pushing to undermine the age of consent, and effectively abolish it.

The National Health Service is the chief cause of ill health in the UK.  It pushes vaccines laced with carcinogens and with other toxic products; it uses the barbaric allopathic practices which do not treat illness but merely cover up symptoms, and butcher patients.  The NHS in the UK gives free sex-changes (sexual mutilation which in no way makes a male female, or female male) to perverts and the mentally ill, whilst destroying the health of those who take their poisons.  It is a vast drain on resources and an excuse for the economic rape of the taxpayer.  It stands in opposition to natural homœopathic medicine and all forms of medicine which work.  The NHS is the pimp of the pharmaceutical industry, and it seeks to turn our daughters into whores.

The NHS is now at the forefront of a battle to give the Contraceptive Pill to all teenage girls from age 13 to 16, well below the legal age of consent.  In Lambeth and Southwark (Southeast London), children are able to walk into a dispensing chemist and ask for the Pill, without any referral to a Doctor or any consultation with parents.  Very immature girls who have been force-fed the pornographic propaganda of the music industry and the 'entertainment' media, have come to identify self-worth with popularity.  In our diseased society, popularity equates to promiscuity.  

The Education system sexualises children by teaching in sex education lessons that all types of sex are equally good, and that everyone should experiment with homosexuality and sexual relations with other races.  The education system teaches sex education to children as young as five years old.  By the time they are teenagers, children are so immersed in pornography from the media, music industry, and direct from the State, that they feel they have to be sexually active.  Films such as 40 Year Old Virgin, ridicule those who 'cannot' get sex.  Newspaper articles such as the Daily Mail's revelations about Millie Mackintosh, paint those who do not engage in promiscuity, as weird.  All this makes children feel they must be promiscuous, and as soon as possible.  This is a pædophile's wet dream come true.

The liars in the State argue that there is a teenage pregnancy crisis which can only be addressed by encouraging girls to use contraceptives.  The fact that contraceptives can cause sterility for a considerable time is not mentioned, nor is the increased risk in contracting venereal diseases.  The destruction of childhood; the deliberate focus upon children as consumers of make-up and other tat; the whole sex industry of the media; none of these are discussed.  Childhood pregnancy is a problem in the UK, but it is because of the policies of the State, not in spite of them.

Children are precious.  They are our future.  Children should be looked after, treated as appropriate to their ages, and protected from the evils of the outside world.  Parents who allow their children to watch television (especially music videos of the Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Rihanna etc variety) are exposing their children to child abuse.  Leaving your child in the care of music videos and so-called teen television is akin to giving your child to the local pædophile.  The State-sanctioned education system is home to many pædophile teachers, and the teaching of sex education is absolutely designed to socially engineer healthy children into soul-less monsters fit to belong to the international order.  The depravity of the State Schools began in the 'Public Schools' where our Establishment were schooled.  It is from the elite Public Schools that the term 'Fag' comes from.  Having an Establishment of deviants, is it any wonder that State policy is perverse and destructive?

We need to Home School our children.  We need to turn off the television.  We need to learn and practice real natural medicine.  We need to be parents, and take responsibility for our own children.  Those who prioritise work above their children and put their children into nurseries from a year old, are condemning their own kin to the clutches of those who seek to destroy them.  The measures to protect our children are hard, but that is no excuse to take the simple option and allow the State to control our lives and the lives of our children.  This country is dying because people do not take responsibility for their own lives and the lives of their loved ones.  Until this changes, and people refuse to cooperate with the State in any form (Education, Healthcare, Media, Law, Tax) we will remain trapped.

Those who deal contraceptives to children are accomplices to pædophilia, and they must be dealt with accordingly.  I have a pædophile living in my neighbourhood, and the police patrol to protect him from the families nearby who would just love to lynch the inhuman beast.  The police are servants of the pædophile Establishment, and now its seems so are those who dispense contraceptives to children.  I appeal to NHS workers to refuse to collaborate in the destruction of our children.  Those who 'go with the flow' deserve to be drowned in the sewer they are a part of.

14 Defining Characteristics of Zionist-Materialism

Like Pavlov's dogs, there is a tendency for people to shriek hysterically at the mention of the word 'Fascist'.  For most people, no attempt is made to understand what is meant by Fascism, and thus they fall into the trap of attacking an ideology just because the Establishment media tell them to.  Such people probably believe in the 6 million kosher corpses yarn, and wet the bed upon hearing tales of the latest Zionist Islamic  al CIAda Al Qaeda plot, scurrying to their Zionist democratic owners representatives for protection.  For grown up, culturally, spiritually and politically awake individuals, this acceptance of Establishment-induced hysteria is really not a good thing.

Gregory Patin, writing for the informative and read-worthy Activist Post, has fallen into the 'boo hiss' anti-Fascist trap.  His article, '14 defining characteristics of fascism' takes at face value the work of secular humanist, Laurence Britt, which defines Fascism as the ultimate evil.  Patin then runs with this assumption and paints the 'New World Order' as Fascistic and presumably as a plot to exterminate the Jews

Patin's acceptance of Britt's analysis is interesting in itself, and indicates his ideological prejudice.  To seriously align oneself to the 'left', or the 'right' to the exclusion of opposing ideologies and ways of thought, is to acquiesce in one's own enslavement.  Left and Right are Establishment-created divisions, such as the manufactured Class Warfare which pits owner against worker; white collar against blue.  We need to steer clear of these divisions and see the value of unity.  Those who seek to polarise us into rival camps are the one's who control every manufactured division.  The only division we should tolerate is the splitting off of those who support the internationalist enslavers, from those who oppose them; no one should aid the despots who feel themselves to be superior to the rest of humanity, even to the point of believing some non-existent deity Chose them to be that way.

Patin deals with the USA in his work, but his research could equally be applied to the EU or many other countries.  The 14 Characteristics of Fascism he cites, can be summarised as follows:

1. Nationalism
2. Human Rights abuses
3. Scapegoating of enemies (e.g. Jews, Muslims)
4. Militarism
5. Sexism/Homophobia and opposition to the murder of unborn children
6. Controlled media
7. National Security paranoia
8. Unification of State and Faith
9. Protection of Corporate power
10. Undermining Workers' Rights
11. Opposition to degenerate art
12. Police State
13. Corruption and Cronyism
14. Election Fraud

This list highlights the thinking of Britt, and its adoption betrays the motives of Patin.  The list is dishonest, and links together aspects of the internationalist agenda with measures to oppose it.

Starting with the points highlighted in red, which could be called fascistic, let us examine how these apply to the USA:

(1) Recently, school pupils were admonished for chanting USA! USA!  Nationalism may be a characteristic of fascism, but it most certainly is not a characteristic of the government of the USA.  Just as in the UK, expression of patriotism is encouraged, but nationalism is forbidden.  Why?  Because Patriotism is loyalty to the State, whereas Nationalism is loyalty to the people.  Internationalism seeks the destruction of all which differentiates individuals and nations, thus Nationalism is defence against Internationalism, and so is forbidden by the architects of the Single Global State. 

(5) Protection of the family and the unborn as living humans, not as things to throw away like rubbish, is in fact on the decline in the USA.  Defence of womanhood and the preservation of the natural society are under serious attack.  Is the defence of the unborn, and the preservation of healthy and natural family structures Fascistic?  Certainly.  But part of the politically correct drive in the Obamanation of North America?  Hardly.  If anything, the US Establishment is hetero-phobic and controlled by militant homosexuals.  President Obama himself is a homosexual who enjoys receiving fellatio from white men.  He has staffed the White House with all manner of perverts.  Under his administration, the unborn are under attack like never before.  The destruction of marriage, the reduction of women from sacred mothers to wage slaves, and the rampant abortion on demand culture all stand in opposition to what is good for society.  Sorry Patin, but on this one you are very, very, wrong.

(8)  If Patin believes that the US regime has adopted a religious fervour, he may be correct.  However, his attempt to link the US Establishment with Christianity is an outright lie.  Yes, the regime do go on pilgrimages to the Holy Land, but not to Bethlehem or to Calvary; they go to the Wailing wall to insert bits of paper into a wall to ask the Jewish God for favours.  Patin has a point on this one; the government USA has abandoned the country's Christian heritage and now worships at the Synagogue of Satan.  Forgive me for stating the bleeding obvious, but Fascism was against the elevation of the Jews to gods over the Gentiles.  Naughty naughty Patin.  A good try, but this stinks of deception.

(11) Degenerate art is injurious to the soul of the people.  Decadent and sickening 'art' and sex-obsessed 'music', not to mention psychologically damaging filth from Hollywood and the Talmudic porn industry, are a part of the new USA.  Inspiring and invigorating real art are dismissed as old-fashioned and fascist, and have been condemned to the memory hole in Zionised countries such as the USA and UK.  Again Patin attacks something wholesome, which is exactly the strategy of the Establishment.

To turn to the remaining points, those in blue are quite subjective, and some are more misleading than others.

(2, 4, 7 & 12) Human Rights abuses and militarism?  Yes the rights of the people of the USA are being systematically undermined, and yes the country is becoming more militarised, but does this indicate that the country is under Fascist control?    The Fascist regimes 'abused' the Human Rights of the Freemasons by banning them, and also the rights of the enemies of the people, by interring them.  The US government attacks the right of people to worship, to speak their minds, to associate with and employ people of their own kind.  The abuses of the Obama regime are anti-Fascist.  As for militarism, military power obeys whoever orders it, and the ideology of the ruling power is of no relevance to the soldiers under their control.  Likewise for National Security and the Police State; these are administrative issues which can occur even under the most liberal of democracies, especially at times of war.

(3) The scape-goating of enemies in the USA is beyond scape-goating; the enemies highlighted by the media have been manufactured and are in many cases paid and controlled by the Establishment (e.g. Al CIAda).  This is a sneaky one from Mr Patin.  Here he tries to link the removal of Jews from positions of influence in Europe, with the attacks against Muslims by the US Government.  This sleight of hand brings images of the fake holocaust to mind, in which the Jews were moved to transit camps for their eventual relocation to Palestine, and significantly, to the USA.  The subject of the holocaust is too complex to go into here, but there is a wealth of information to indicate that the Jews were neither scape-goated (insofar as their leaders WERE and ARE at war with humanity), or gassed.  There is much information about this on the forum at this link.  For Patin to eagerly accept the 6 million canard and indeed to link it to the Zionist assault on Islam and Christianity is disingenuous to say the least.  Scape-goating is a characteristic of Zionist thinking, and was practised by the Talmudic rulers of the USSR to silence critics.  It is known today as political correctness, and there is nothing Fascistic about that.

(6) The media in the USA is controlled by the Zionist Internationale.  Under Fascism, the media has to serve the people by producing art, music and entertainment which is culturally enriching.  Control of information is an unfortunate reality in the Fascist system, and one of its points which is problematic.  A system of free media would of course be better for the people, but control always rests with the editors, owners and those who oversea the media as a whole.  In the USA there is such a thing as Public Service Broadcasting, which allows for anyone to speak as he or she feels.  This is a wonderful thing which those of us in fully controlled countries such as the UK, look to with admiration.  The advent of political correctness has undermined the freedom of the media, and the take-over of small-scale media by large international concerns has all but eradicated the free press.  What is left is online media such as this, and the Internet itself is under threat.  The power behind the erosion of freedom is associated with the Rothschilds, Murdoch, Reuters et al, all of whom are a part of the Zionist network.  A free media is a requisite of a free country, and Fascism fails this test.  However, to label the Zionisation of the western media as Fascist is a mistake.  I can see Patin's point here, but the correlation is messy, and does not stand up to scrutiny.

(9 & 10)  Patin refers to Corporatism, but fails to distinguish between the Corporatism of Mussolini, and the modern Corporatism which shares its name, but stands in diametrical opposition.  The Corporatism of Fascism binds together the workers and owners as a cooperative unit who work for the well being of the nation.  Workers' Rights are not undermined, but are enhanced as the workers are a part of the corporation, and not merely servants or employees.  This is the very basis of Fascism and Syndicalism, and Patin errs by linking it with the destructive money-worshipping international corporatism of today.  Under Fascism, there was no 'out-sourcing' to countries overseas, where as in international corporatism, out-sourcing to Communist China has reached the point where hardly anything in the USA (or EU) is made anywhere but China.  The point of the Corporate State was to rein-in the power of industry, in order to make it serve the people.  To this end, foreign ownership of the means of production, and the usurious practices of the stock market were forbidden.  Patin here labels the internationalist take-over of the economy as Fascistic.  It is as far removed from Fascism as is imaginable.

(13 & 14)  Corruption, Cronyism and Election Fraud are certainly rife in the USA.  Patin's attempt to label the government as Fascists due to their selfishness and promotion of kin and fellow parasites is intriguing.  Is he here trying to dirty the name of the Fascist movements by associating them with the decadent materialists of the modern age?  Elections were not fought according to party and the ability to throw money behind candidates who lied to gain office; parties were banned due to their divisive nature.  Comparing the two systems makes no sense, unless the objective is to dirty the name of one with the other.  Ironically Patin seeks to use Fascism to undermine the character of the gangsters in Congress, the Senate and the White house!  If only their level of corruption equalled that of the Fascists of bygone days.  As fallible as they were, they were saints in comparison with the vipers in power today.

All-in-all, Patin's attempt to use the Fascist epithet to attack the government of the USA, rests on the refusal of the people to take the time to study the truth behind the label.  Fascism was far from perfect, but it did provide a workable opposition to internationalism.  This is most likely why it is so often used to describe internationalism, and to thereby make people run from what could be a good defence against our developing enslavement.

The murder of femininity

In much of the western world, but especially the UK, the natural qualities of women are viewed as the result of male oppression, and in their place are subsituted harmful parodies of femininity, based upon ludicrous ideas of the supremacy of material gain, and an over-emphasis of physical attributes.  The attack on the feminine is rife throughout the Judaised west, as is evident in the media portrayal of women as whores or workaholics.  The natural role of a woman as mother and carer is mocked as a male construct, whereas in fact these traits are the fullest expressions of feminine beauty.

For girls growing up exposed to the western media, manufactured 'pop' music and the Hollywood film industry, the message is ceaselessly repeated: to succeed you must be a whore, and to be faithful to one man is to be old-fashioned (which of course, can never be allowed). 

Typical of the media obsession with sex as the key to success is an article in the Daily Mail, concerning the model Candice Swanepoel, who at 15 years of age (still a child) took a job as a semi-naked personality-less walking clothes horse, to shew her school bullies that she was better than them.  Really?  Regardless of whether she was bullied, the message to school girls is that by exposing one's flesh, one can achieve material gain, and therefore by the acquisition of wealth, be a better person than those who do not go down this route.  With this logic, is it any wonder that girls are getting pregnant at ever earlier ages?  To be a sex object is to be popular.  This is nothing short of the promotion of prostitution, and pædophilia.

On television and in films, sex is promoted as the be-all and end-all of human achievement.  The notion that it is ok for a girl to be promiscuous, because boys are, is childish logic which sits alongside the 'he started it' argument.  It is not ok for anyone to be promiscuous!  Of course the whole anti-feminine movement is Talmudic in origin with the sick and twisted 'eye for an eye' ideology; which fails to address the wisdom of mutual blinding.

Brought up in an atmosphere in which ideals are mocked, and instant gratification is the model, it is only to be expected that a considerable number of girls will adopt the negative lifestyle of the manufactured role models.  Television programmes such as Sex and the City debase women.  Women are naturally sexual beings, but are much more as well.  The gossip media's preoccupation with divorce and adultery effectively normalises the abnormal.  Girls are taught that they must experiment with lesbianism and that it would be evil to not 'date' outside one's own race.  Homosexuality and ethnic identity destruction are added to the litany of horrors with which children, and girls in particular, are assaulted.

The music industry no longer focuses upon talent, but upon debauchery.  The likes of Beyonce and Avril Lavigne who began their careers singing about virtue and even opposing the sexualisation of music, have now joined the flesh-fest which encourages girls to be unpaid whores.  To succeed as a 'celebrity' one must be willing to sleep one's way to the top.  This instruction is repeated in every aspect of the celebrity-worshipping culture, and so honour and faithfulness have suffered.

When vacant individuals who become rich and famous for no other reason than having the dubious talent for having promiscuous sex and exposing  their bodies, become role models, all is not well with society.  The tendency of celebrities to marry, then within weeks divorce, makes a mockery of marriage.  When this attack on marriage is joined by government as in the pro-homosexual London regime, it is time to take notice of what is obviously an orchestrated assault on decency.

In the UK we have the ridiculous EDL.  This group of thugs like to misquote the Qur'an and to focus on the fake Islamic sect created by the Talmudist, Abd al-Wahhab.  The primary reason that the multi-culti EDL hate Islam is the fidelity of Muslim women to their husbands, and their modest dress.  Indeed, if Muslim girls would only dress like whores and have sex with the disgusting vermin of the EDL, they would have no problem with Islam!  The EDL have swallowed the Talmudic lie that the women of Christian Europe are, and have always been, shiksas.  Certainly the type of female who will have sex with an EDL thug does merit the label shiksa, but such damaged goods are not representative of English women in general, which must irk the scum of the EDL.

It is only since the judaisation of the UK became endemic after the slaughter of the UK's finest in two Zionist World Wars, that femininity came under serious attack.  European women have always been honoured by their men folk.  Motherhood is a noble and rewarding vocation which no form of employment can rival.  The labelling of motherhood as a chore which denies a woman her freedom is pure evil.  Only by breaking real families can the Talmudic destruction of the Goyim be achieved.  Getting girls to behave as unpaid prostitutes acclimatises them to a belief that promiscuity is normal and faithfulness is a perversion.  This tragic phenomenon has only become so prevalent through the concerted effort of the Talmudist in government and their kin in the media and entertainment industry.  It is not the norm, nor ever has been.

In traditional Europe, women dressed modestly and wore little or no make-up.  An unjudaised European woman has more in common with a Muslim woman as far as dress and fidelity are concerned, than with the damaged image-obsessed girls and women of our current unfortunate times.  If the EDL were really concerned with defending England, they would be campaigning for the outlawing of pornography, the protection of marriage (real marriage between one man and one woman), the punishment of adultery (by either party), the treatment of homosexuals, and the adoption of modest dress by men and women alike.  Instead they defend perversion and campaign for all women to dress and act as low-class call girls, regardless of faith, marital status, or age ( like the pædophile Simon Sheppard, they like 'em young).

England has the disadvantage of not having a distinct National Dress, unlike most of Europe, including our neighbours in Scotland, and Wales (including Kernow and Brittany).  An English National Dress would help to reconnect us with our ancestors, and it is perhaps indicative of the despotism of the internationalist mafia who comprise the Establishment, that our culture has been assaulted more than the rest of the UK or the territories occupied under the Talmudic 'royal' banner.

Femininity should be cherished.  We need to protect our children from exposure to popular 'culture'. In the 1970s and 1980s there was a woman named Mary Whitehouse, who campaigned against degeneracy.  She was vilified by the media, but if anything her campaigns were soft on our enemies.  In her days there were only three (later four) television channels in the UK (none operating 24 hours per day), there was no Internet, and films could only be seen on television or at a cinema.  The debilitating influence of the media is now much worse than in Whitehouse's day, thus avoiding exposure is much harder.  In Whitehouse's time, political correctness was confined to rabid Marxists and not the norm as it is now.  Our struggle is hard but that is no excuse for surrendering without a fight.  There is an 'off' button on the television - use it!

A concerted attack on femininity is underway.  All of us who cherish family, morality, and all which the internationalists seek to eradicate, are duty-bound to expose the corruption of our children, especially girls, and to do all in our power to push back the influence of the enemy.  We may not be able to stop the filth getting on television etc, but we can stop it getting into our homes.  Vermin like the EDL will always exist, but we can highlight their hypocrisy and distance ourselves from their odious internationalist propaganda.  

By educating our children with decency, and a sense of worth which doesn't require material rewards or the approval of those who have absorbed the toxin of feminism, we can make a difference to our kin.  And in the end, the fight against internationalism is a fight for our nearest and dearest.  We are on the long journey to victory over the global enemy, and to paraphrase the Chinese philosopher Laozi, every journey begins with the first step.

Stand by Marriage. Say no to the anti-natural mafia.

Marriage is unique

Throughout history and in virtually all human societies marriage has always been the union of a man and a woman. Marriage reflects the complementary natures of men and women. Although death and divorce may prevent it, the evidence shows that children do best with a married mother and a father.

No need to redefine

Civil partnerships already provide all the legal benefits of marriage so there's no need to redefine marriage. It's not discriminatory to support traditional marriage. Same-sex couples may choose to have a civil partnership but no one has the right to redefine marriage for the rest of us.

Profound consequences

If marriage is redefined, those who believe in traditional marriage will be sidelined. People's careers could be harmed, couples seeking to adopt or foster could be excluded, and schools would inevitably have to teach the new definition to children. If marriage is redefined once, what is to stop it being redefined to allow polygamy?

Speak up

People should not feel pressurised to go along with same-sex marriage just because of political correctness. They should be free to express their views. A public consultation on the proposals to redefine marriage has been launched. Although the Government says it is determined to press ahead regardless, the consultation provides an opportunity for members of the public to say they do not agree with redefining marriage.

Source: Coalition For Marriage

Thanks to Final Conflict for drawing attention to this campaign.  At the above link is an electronic petition in defence of marriage, and against the outlawing of the terms Husband and Wife - I kid you not, the Government seek to erase these words from the English language.  Take a moment to sign the petition and let the Establishment know that they do not have the support of the people, and that we will not allow our most sacred institutions to be spat by perverts 'and' politicians.

Happy MOTHERing Sunday

Today in the UK, is Mothering Sunday.  This is a day to honour the work that Mother's do in raising the next generation.  For the feminist hyenas, it must grate that a day is set aside to celebrate the most noble, worthy and creative work of women; a task which is natural and wholesome; that of being a Mother.

In the drive to reduce the population to a mass of mindless producer-consumers, the London regime is pushing forward legislation to enforce the lunatic idea that the sick destructive notions of liberalism are in some way of equal worth with the natural and glorious institutions of marriage and family.  The ceaseless attack on all that is good in the natural society, is today pushed out of the spotlight by a celebration of beauty and nature.

Against all odds, marriage is still a living institution in the UK, and in fact is becoming ever more popular, in spite of decades of feminist propaganda linking marriage with slavery.  As much as it dismays the feminist mafia, women are rejecting the push to turn them into baby-making machines who immediately abandon their children to the waiting clutches of the anti-human State.  Although some women do believe the lie that it is a good thing to be a wage slave and put one's children into the arms of non-family members, for the majority, this is not the case, and the natural priority of caring for one's children first and foremost, is being adhered to, and cherished.

A strong family with a man as the provider of economic necessities, and the woman as the primary nurturer, is the best environment for a healthy child.  On this Mothering Sunday, I salute all the women who have overcome the barrage of propaganda, and have held fast to the greatest and most rewarding work any woman can perform; that of being a loving mother, raising her children in the way that only a Mother can.  Of course, I also salute the supportive Father who completes the natural family.

Being a Mother is not a chore; it is not a form of exploitation; it is the most natural and rewarding task any woman can undertake.  Family is the backbone of the nation, and the united household with the Father as bread-winner, and Mother as child-carer is the true centre of the family.  

So long as the Family prevails, the internationalist order cannot.  Bravo to the Mothers of the nation.  In tandem with the Fathers who support your work, you are the true heart of the struggle.  Let the dried-up self-loathing feminists mock you; their opinions are not worth a moment of your attention.  They are nothing; you are the cornerstone of the future.

Obama and Cameron have a gay time in Washington

Amidst an economic downturn which is creating mass poverty across the USA and EU, the UK Prime Minister 'Dave' Cameron has been in Washington enjoying a lavish State affair, with his good buddy, fake-President, Barry Soetoro.  The visit has cost both the UK and USA a small fortune, but not to worry, so long as the money is wasted on the puppet despots, then it is money well wasted.  After all, the common people do not deserve the respect and concern of those they elect.  To think otherwise would be to harbour dangerous thoughts about the elected representatives being in place to serve us!  Perish the thought.

To prove that the shindig in the USA was purely for the entertainment of those involved, non-President Barry the Kenyan, took the opportunity to expand his repertoire from just a teleprompter-reading and singing fool, to perform some stand-up comedy.  In a speech which must have had his owners in stitches, the puppet-in-chief stated that he trusted Cameron, and cited his 'humanitarian' mission in Libya as proof of what a good little boy he is.  Maybe this kind of sick humour, making light of the murder of thousands of Libyans and the crushing of their country by NATO and UK/US-controlled terrorists, isn't to everyone's liking, but it did put a smile on both puppets faces.

Back home, the Cameron-led government has announced that it will not let anything stand in the way of its plans to make homosexual marriage equal to real marriage.  Interestingly, the spokes-creature pushing this (the ironically named Equalities Minister) is also campaigning to make wearing a Christian Cross at work illegal.  The inEqualities Minister, Lynne Featherstone is a militant lesbian who hates heterosexuals, and also any symbols of morality.  Why do we allow these freaks to hold positions of power?  Featherstone is clearly in need of treatment for her perversion, and her dangerous psychotic hatred of the ordinary people.

Barack Obama is a closet queer who especially likes to have a white man give him a blow-job.  He was raised by a mentally ill Nanny who thought he was a woman trapped in a man's body, and typical of the actions of a queer pædophile, the pooftah Nanny found exposing his sickness to the young Barry, amusing.  With his queer Nanny (how Socialist!) and his decadent Jewish mother, no wonder Barry turned out to be a sodomite.  Barry infamously had his homosexual lover, Larry Sinclair, murdered to keep him from 'outing' him.  Of course, with the blood of tens of thousands on his hands, what is one man's death to this queer psychopath?

Cameron is an old Public School boy, raised in a heavily homosexual environment, replete with fags of every variety.  Is it possible that his support for homosexuals is a personal matter pertaining to a hidden homosexual tendency in his own life?  Perhaps his meeting in the USA with the Queen of America was more than a business trip?  At any rate, both enjoyed a 'gay' time at the tax payers expense.  It makes one wonder just how special, the 'special relationship' between Dave and Barry is, and how many militant queers are in the UK and US Establishment?

The Establishment may be preoccupied with pushing degeneracy and illness as normal, but then considering the proclivities of these creatures, that should be of no surprise to anyone.  The Establishment stands against the people, and unlike the homosexuals they favour, there is no cure for them.

In a related case of the homosexual mafia persecuting normal people, a preacher in Cumberland (not Cumbria thank you!) has been arrested for a comment he made whilst walking in his home town.  The preacher was overheard saying that homosexuality is a sin.  For this he was thrown into a police cell for contravention of the Public Order Act (1986).  In the internationalist anti-human sewer which we used to call home, expressing an opinion is a serious offence.  Had the preacher been engaged in an act of public indecency in a public toilet, he would have been given a warning at the very most, but to speak about homosexuality is less than praising terms, led to his arrest.  In the UK, perverts rule, and the thought police ensure they are protected from criticism.


The last word on this should be left to a Catholic Priest in Poland who eloquently puts the case for normal people who are not obsessed with anal sex, scatology, and all other riches of the pooftah lifestyle. 

Thanks to Final Conflict for the following video.