Showing posts with label The Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Law. Show all posts

Friday, 11 January 2013

Democracy is a sham. Real change comes from elsewhere

Eddy Morrison, the author of Nationalist Sentinel, has written the following post:

British Democratic Party - a bolt hole for the BNP drop outs


I have just submitted a fairly long critique to the nascent BDP website. To sum it up, I view this fourth party to be called the BDP as yet another populist failure - its only difference to the 'now is history' BNP is that though it hasn't got Griffin it still has all his ideological baggage.

Populism reigns supreme and men who should know FAR BETTER such as my long term friend Andrew Brons should know better!


Andrew your home is back in the Front where you were once Chairman and have spent most of your political life. Getting into bed with with this Frankenstein created hotch potch of failures is a drastic mistake and a road to nowhere.


It will have all the appeal of a discarded Big Mac and I can GUARANTEE compulsory repatriation and calls for some Black and Jewish members will be a certainty......I am telling you before time does......Eddy

Eddy does not allow comments on his blog, so I will place my response to his post here.

All who are actively supporting one faction of the absurdly splintered Nationalist movement in the UK, against the others are wasting their time, and falling prey to a well-crafted Establishment trap.  The same applies to every country in the European world, where in-fighting takes up so much time and effort, that the International Enemy can rush through its assault on humanity, safe in the knowledge that those who oppose its machinations are so bogged down in the minutiæ of ideology, that they cannot offer a workable resistance to their plans.

For those outside the UK, the Front to which Eddy refers, is the National Front (NF).  The name has become psychologically linked with the Holocaustian religion, and is as likely to repel the brain-washed majority of television-viewing voters as would a poster of corpses and a slogan of 'next year six million more!'  Yes I know the Holyhoax is complete propaganda and lies, but Joe Public has been subjected to the lie for 7 decades; many people believe that the BBC soap opera, 'Eastenders' is real, such is the power of the idiot box. 

We don't need parties.  The way forward is for independent candidates to stand on policies alone, and not as representatives of parties.  At present we have the BNP, NF, BDP, etc etc standing for the same seats and by so doing splitting any anti-Internationalist vote.  We need to reach an agreement whereby no genuine 'Nationalist' will stand against another.  A hard task certainly, but better than continuing to use the same strategy which has failed so consistently, for so long.

Democracy is a sham.  If we must have parties, then we need real community action to garner well-deserved support, like undertaken by the Golden Dawn who feed the indigenous hungry in Greece.  Mass poverty is gripping our people, but the parties who profess to stand for the people are nowhere to be seen.  Making speeches in pubs to rapturous applause, then doing nothing for the people, is a waste of hot air, and is inexcusable.

A street presence of zero, and rigid party politics cannot change anything.  We have lost London, Luton, Leicester, Slough, and are close to losing more of our towns and cities to mass immigration.  If we are to halt our demise, and indeed to reverse the destruction of all we hold dear, then we have to face the reality that playing the Establishment game benefits no-one except the scum in the Establishment who collect our hard earned money which we foolishly give them in the form of election deposits.  Enough is enough!  Ground Hog Day has to come to an end!

Eddy is quite correct that due to the Establishment rules governing the composition of registered political parties, there must be non-indigenous members, and Jew-friendly policies.  Populism is enshrined in the political system of the UK, and cannot be avoided by anyone who accepts the authority of the Establishment to dictate the structure of parties.  The BNP under Nick Gri££in played the Establishment game and became just as corrupt as its counterparts in Westminster; discrediting the entire 'Nationalist' opposition to Internationalism, and damaging others in the process.  Those who play the Party game, cannot avoid the enforced multi-culturalism and populism which is built into it.

Why would anyone even wish to be a part of a registered party? The time when like-minded individuals could gather together unmolested by the State is long over.  Registered parties have to keep membership lists, which the State is entitled to look at whenever it sees fit.  What better way to gather information about who stands against the Establishment and its Internationalist multi-culti programme?  Additionally, party funds have to be declared to the State, thus giving the enemy an accurate assessment of the finances of those who oppose them (assuming of course that the Parties aren't riddled with Statists to begin with).

Networking is a vital part of the Resistance, but belonging to 'Parties' is not.  Why not band together under politically anonymous means such as Sports Associations or any other recreational interest groups.  If we have to apply labels to ourselves, then we should make them ones which the Establishment cannot profit from.  We are treated as criminals anyway.  We need to think of ourselves as separate from the rotting corpse of the Establishment and abandon all illusions of ever becoming part of the mainstream by playing to their rules.  Why anyone would wish to become 'respectable' in the eyes of people who routinely abuse the Media, Education system, and Care Home system to procure children for the pædophiles in power, is beyond fathomable.  We need to build a complete counter culture which will destroy and replace the old order entirely and not be contaminated through contact with it.

Anyone who has ever been to a political meeting of a non-multi culti organisation, will know that there has to be a whole circus of security hoops to jump through before even getting to the rendezvous point, let alone the secret meeting location.  This security system is necessary due to the willingness of the political police to close meetings and arrest people for public order offences as soon as their goons in the Marxist front groups (UAF, ANL et al) discover their locations and attack them.  One such meeting was attacked by organised Marxists, who threw an axe through the window of the pub, above which the meeting was held.  The police prevented anyone leaving the building until their fellow-internationalist filth in the 'anti-Fascist' movement had fled, then proceeded to arrest those who had been attacked!  This is quite typical of the Marxist-police cooperation in Zionist-occupied Britain. Had the meeting not been held by a registered organisation, the police would have found it much harder to persecute those present.  Playing the game is setting oneself up for the tyranny of the enemy.

We cannot beat the system by being a part of it, only by being apart from it.  There is no valid reason for anyone joining a registered party and thereby giving his or her details directly to the enemy.  We can (and must) organise without their official documents giving us permission to do so! Why does anyone even wish to achieve official permission from the enemy to act against them?  This is especially perplexing when one considers that the conditions attached for their permission is our acceptance of their authority to determine who can join our organisations and which ideas we can discuss; hence our total submission.  Let the Civic Nationalists cuddle up to the enemy and by so doing become an identifiable part of the problem.  Let the Resistance forge ahead under the cover of anonymity and wrestle freedom from the clutches of our eternal foe.  We are in a war for our very survival.  Handing the enemy all the information it requires to ensure the opposition remains powerless, is not very intelligent, and cannot achieve anything other than our total defeat.

A very important book outlining the Cell Structure which can be employed to organise and conduct actions against the enemy, is the Nest leaders Manual by Corneliu Z Codreanu.  Download it here.  All tools which aid our struggle, need to be utilised.

Thursday, 13 December 2012

Unlawful Killing: The Murder of Diana Spencer by the Windsor Mafia

The following film is likely to be taken down very soon, so watch it whilst you can has been taken down, and anyone who uploads it to youtube is likely to have his or her account terminated; so beware!  Diana Spencer was murdered by the Windsor Mafia, after delivering an heir to the throne (William), and the illegitimate bastard child, Harry Windsor.  The UK Monarchy is a family of pure evil, and not one of them deserves to escape the justice of the people.  Diana herself was no angel, and indeed was an ardent multi-cultist who went so far as to become impregnated by an Arab.  This was the final straw for the Jewish ruling family of the UK, and was the reason she was killed.  I reproduced the film below, not out of any empathy with a woman of Jewish stock who was hell-bent on destroying the European identity of our shores, but rather to highlight the evil of our enemies, and how their cruelty extends to members of their own circles who do not tow the line.  

Anyone who still holds onto any Royalist sympathies must surely reconsider supporting this anti-human dross; hopefully this film will help to free such people from the poison of Windsor-worship.  The Windsors are in any case usurpers to the Throne and have no business having any power whatsoever over the people of the UK.  Let them move to their stolen 'Promised Land' and live amongst their fellow Khazar and Sephardic parasites; better still let them move to the only real Jewish State, Birobidjan, and take the occupiers of Palestine with them.

It is time for the policies enacted during the time of Windsor misrule to be reversed, and for all of Europe be cleansed of the scum which has risen to positions of authority over us.  A free Europe must be built alongside a free world, in which those who have had their homelands destroyed by the Establishment will be afforded everything which can make their lands fit for them to return to, and thereby end the intolerable anti-natural conditions we dwell in where our people and those who have been brought in by our common enemy, are forced to live together to the detriment of the indigenous people and the newcomers.

The ruling parasites have no right to force multiculturalism onto us, and no right to dictate that we cannot dwell in harmony with our kin in our own sacred lands.  Likewise their policies which put profits above people, and have led to the devastation of many nations around the world, must be ended, and National Freedom be restored for everyone.  Let their Talmudic racism and Jewish supremacist lunacy be swept from the face of the Earth, and all peoples be allowed to live in ethnic homogeneity amongst their own kin.  A Free Europe is a Windsor-free Europe, and indeed a Europe cleansed of all the Zionist Ruling Families, whether in the UK, the Netherlands, or any other of our countries.  It is time for them to go; one way or another.

(The rest of the article has been removed to comply with the restrictions imposed by the Censors - see following article).

Friday, 16 November 2012

Democracy is Dead - and the People know it.

Yesterday the people of England and Wales were asked to vote for the newly created posts of Police and Crime Commissioners.  The totally alien idea is akin to the American concept of Elected Sheriffs, and has absolutely no place in our countries.  Of course, to the Internationalists and Atlanticists, anything which undermines the identity of sovereign nations, is a good thing.  

We have recently had all manner of pointless referenda, including Proportional Representation, Regional Assemblies in England, Directly Elected Mayors, and such nonsense.  In every case, the hoped for outcomes would have created extra tiers of bureaucracy and thus more paid positions for the ever-growing State.  With the exceptions of Bristol and Doncaster, Elected Mayors were rejected, and all the regions rejected the Assemblies which would have been used to fragment England and make resistance to the politburo in Bruxelles harder.  The system of PR was also thrown out by the electorate; seeing in it yet more opportunities for vote-rigging and corruption.  On issues such as membership of the European Union, mass immigration and other vital issues which the people have been clamouring for for decades, the people have not been offered any referenda, simply because the outcomes would hamper the move to a one world state and encourage separatists and indigenous rightists across the Union.

Knowing full well that the people do not want Crime Commissioners, no referenda were offered.  The results of the elections have proven just how out of touch with the people, the government really is.  In the border town of Newport NO ONE voted at all!  In the rest of the joined countries of England and Wales, the turn out ranged from 10% to 15%, which meant that nearly 90% of both countries rejected the idea of Crime Commissioners.  3% of the vote in Wiltshire was deliberately 'spoilt' to send the message that these elections are a travesty.  In an amazing display of arrogance, the elections were held under a system of Proportional Representation; the very system which the people were offered in a referendum, and rejected overwhelmingly.  The whole farce has cost the taxpayer £100 million, which in these days of Austerity is an insult and an abuse.  The new Commissioners will have their own staff and will cost the people a fortune.  The turnout should be enough to act as a referendum and cancel the whole process; but of course in the UK, the democratic will of the people counts for nothing.

In the By-elections in Central Manchester, Cardiff South, and Corby which occured at the same time as the ridiculous Police elections, the people have abstained en masse; clearly shewing that they have awoken to the reality that the Liberals, Conservatives and Labour are but the same Banker-serving Internationalist Politically Correct (anti-indigenous) puppets. differing only by the party label they use.  In Manchester the turnout was a record low of just 18.1%.  The winning candidate won with only 11,507 votes.  In Cardiff the new MP gained only 9,193 votes (47.3% of the votes cast).  Under the so-called democratic system in the UK, the overwhelming rejection of the candidates counts for nothing; being rejected by 86% of the electorate does not mean one cannot take a seat in the House of Commons!  Such lunacy is reminiscent of the Rotten Boroughs of yesteryear.

The people have spoken.  We do not want the Crime Commissioners.  We do not want the Three-Party goons; indeed we do not want their fraudulent Party system at all.  We are heartily sick of the corrupt liars who are bleeding us dry whilst flooding our lands with immigrants, enforcing Internationalist and Culturally Marxist dogma against our wishes, and selling us out to the highest bidders of the One World State.  The Establishment has spoken too:  We are having the expensive and pointless Commissioners regardless of our wishes, and massive votes of abstention against their candidates are being ignored.  Democracy is Dead.  We know it.  The Establishment knows it.  There is no longer any excuse whatsoever to obey the despots.  

Perhaps the Syrian government will lodge an appeal to the United Nations to have the anti-democratic depots in Westminster removed by force?  Or does that only apply to people who do not tow the Internationalist line?

Friday, 2 November 2012

Holocaustianity: The Religion of the West

Since the time of the hijacking of the Reformation by Judaic elements, Christianity has been in decline.  The new Protestant religions which sprang up in an attempt to curtail the rampant corruption in Rome, were the forefathers of the Judæo-Christian heresy.  The so-called Old Testament Christianity of Oliver Cromwell, was nothing but the Jewish Torah with a Christian veneer.  For all the talk of Torah Judaism versus Talmudic Judaism, the essentials remain the same; the Jews maintain their position as God's Chosen people, and as such as a Master Race to rule over the rest of us, in the manner of a Slave Owner and his property.  Judæo-Christianity is Jewish Supremacy, no matter how it wraps itself up.

The rot which set into Christianity came after years of intrigue by Talmudic forces.  The formation of the Jesuits by the Jew, Ignatius Loyola, took the Judaic heresy to the heart of Catholicism.  The ills of the Jesuits are well-documented, but the destructive influence of the Judaisers really only overtook mainstream Catholicism in the treacherous Vatican II, of which the current anti-Pope, Ratzinger, was a key architect.  In an act of defiance against the coalition of liberals, atheists and kosher-'Christians' who reduced the Church of Rome to a plaything of the anti-Christians, the Society of Saint Pius X was created.  This last bastion of true Catholicism would be a thorn in the side of those who captured Rome, until that organisation too was compromised by the stooge of Ratzinger, Bernard Fellay.

With Christianity in tatters, the new religion of Europe has become the worship of the Jewish people.  Does this sound extreme?  Consider the fact that the European Jewish Parliament sits alongside the main Parliament to ensure that rules for the Goyim do not affect the ruling caste

Laws prohibiting criticism of Israel, or the over-representation of Jews in positions of authority (in commerce, government, media et al) are ironically referred to as measures to combat anti-Semitism; the Ashkenazim who are the overwhelming majority of the Jewish nation, have no Semitic blood whatsoever, although their Palestinian victims are Semites.

Pilgrimages to Holy places are no longer a part of the school curriculum.  However, new pilgrimages are in place.  These include visits to the twin Holies of Holies of the new religion - Auschwitz and Yad Vashem.  For Holocaustians, there is nothing more righteous than to contemplate the myth of the 6 million temporarily dead Jews; so long as that contemplation doesn't allow for any facts to get in the way which disprove the entire Faith.

Just like in the Jewish-led (Jesuit) Inquisition, during which vast numbers of Europeans were put to death by an army of butchers taking their instructions from a hidden Jewish hierarchy, so in the modern era, non-believers are harshly punished.  The recent expulsion from the Society of Saint Pius X of the Holocaustian heretic, Bishop Richard Williamson, at the behest of the anti-Pope, Ratzinger, is proof that Christianity has been replaced by the new Church of the Holyhoax.  The prodigal SSPX has been recaptured by the anti-Christ liberal monstrosity, which sits as an imposture in Rome.  It is noteworthy that within months of the despicable Fellay surrendering the bulwark of Christian Traditionalism to the Liberal bigots, the defiant defender of Christianity, Bishop Williamson, was expelled from the organisation he helped to build.  His crime?  Did he profess atheistic tendencies, pro-homosexual views, touchy-feely treacherous multi-culti œcumenicalism, globalist materialism of either the capitalist or communist variety?  No!  He did none of these things (unlike the official Church); he reiterated the reality that the Jews are the Synagogue of Satan, and he affirmed a belief that the Holyhoax is naught but propaganda to justify the Zionist takeover of humanity.  His crime was to affirm Christian thought, and to doubt the faith of Holocaustianity.

In a recent article in the UK paper, the Daily Mail, the fact that German soldiers and civilians were tortured into confessing crimes which they did not commit, and which did not even exist in reality, brought forth the most absurd comments form the readers of that 'news'paper.  Having just read an article detailing how the British military had tortured and murdered vast numbers of people in order to create the idea that the Germans were an evil people who had committed genocide against the Jews; an article which alluded to the fact that the confessions of Rudolf Hoess and the rest of those judicially murdered at Nürnberg were extracted through the most heinous barbarity, and were therefore inadmissible in court, and invalid, the readers responded with comments praising the torture of the 'nazis' as justifiable because because of what they did to the Jews - as proven at the Nürnberg Trials!!

The banality of those who responded to an article exposing the brutality of the victors who paved the way for the international slave plantation in which we live, could be cause for despair; could, but by no means should.  Likewise the demise of Christianity in its organised form, and the fulfilment of the millennia-long plan to turn the heart of Christianity - Rome - into the Whore of Babylon, could be cause for lamentation.  The alternative view is that the open treachery of the Church (in Catholic and Protestant forms) gives the opportunity for the sectarian divisions which have kept the resistance to the global enemy at each others throats, to be buried, and for us to finally unite.  The mindless stupidity of those who believe that torture is fine because the people who were tortured confessed to heinous crimes, is indicative of the mentality we are up against.  The fact that more people than ever are awake to the reality that the Holocaust is a propaganda trick to enslave us to the racist supremacists of Organised Jewry, is far more important than the buffoonery of a few tabloid readers; especially considering that many of the commentators would have been paid activists of the Holyhoax Industry.

Holocaustianity is the religion of the Establishment.  The absolute devotion of our enemies to a creed entirely built on lies, gives us the opportunity to unite with a clear focal point to fight.  The fact that legislation is in place to prohibit criticism of Holocaustianity makes us all blasphemers against the Cult of the Oppressors.  So be it.  If history has taught us anything, it is that persecution and martyrdom only makes those who hold on to the truth stronger.  The false religion of the internationalists will fall, and their sacred sites will be erased from the world.  Their gloating and their arrogance will make the inevitable destruction of their ideology and all that is built upon it, all the sweeter.

Saturday, 13 October 2012

MASS IMMIGRATION IS GENOCIDE!

The following video, and text, perfectly describes the treachery committed by the politicians in every nation in Europe, who serve international finance, and who have invited alien peoples into our lands.  We are being exterminated culturally and ethnically, and the traitors within have used every means at their disposal (legal and otherwise) to silence dissent.  It is time to make a stand, and to refuse to cooperate with our oppressors.  Our lands belong to us, and it is time to take them back; starting with the return of our unwanted guests back to where they belong, and of course, with dealing with the treacherous Establishment, in the only way befitting those who have led us to this terrible point in our history.

Europe for Europeans, Turkey for Turks, Pakistan for Pakistanis, Jamaica for Jamaicans, China for Chinese  - not just those already living there, but for ALL OF THEM.

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/572AAtAt5C4  If any video deserve to go viral, it is this one.


Immigrants enrich our culture!
Our future is multi cultural!
Race, religion and ethnic background does not matter at all,
we are all equal, and differ from each other, only in the color of our skin!

By using such blatant lies, Europes politicians try to make the demise of the European peoples more palatable to them!

But these lies convince less Europeans, day by day!, because a growing number of people knows in the meantime!, mass-immigration is genocide!

Nothing is more proscribed than xeno-phobia.

It's only villains with their hearts full of hatred, who dislike immigrants?
Isn't it?

But you too, have wondered now and then, what are they doing here?

After all, they aren't asylum seekers all of them.

Correct!

Most of them are here for only one reason, there is something to get, social welfare for example.

Or money from wealthy Europeans, by peddling fake goods to them.
That's a more comfortable life than working all day in Africa or Anatolia.
And they are in a country, where everything still is running well and medical treatment available.

Really perverse is, that we are forced to accept being bad-mouthed by them, if not even worse things, such as mugging, rape and homicide!

And as their number is increasing, they become more and more prone to violence.

European politicians support this development and talk us into believing, it is our moral duty to turn our homelands into ideal immigration countries because of human-rights and our historical responsibility.

In Germany it is about the 'Holocaust', in France and England about colonialism, and in the USA about slavery, etc...

But have you killed Jews or traded slaves?

Have you been a colonial master?

And what about Norway for example, which became independent not before the beginning of the 20th century and had been a poor country then?

And what is the true reason for mass immigration?

International high finance and their henchmen, the politicians, want to replace the European cultural nations, by a racially mixed population without identity, in order to establish a perfect exploitation system, the New-World-Order!

We will become prisoners in our own countries!
Victims of our humaneness and our wrong concept of tolerance towards intolerance!

By their sheer number the aliens will destroy our societies!

Alone in 2011 one million people came to Germany, mainly from the Third-World.

More than 2 million illegal immigrants live in Athens.

The most common first name given to newborn boys, is Mohammed, in almost all major European cities.

This going on, will lead to as many aliens as natives in European countries, in 2040!

He, who imports people from the Third World, brings the Third World into his home.

Filth, poor education, crime, and lifestyles we had overcome long ago, enter our daily lives, and we ourselves are to respect alien and archaic religious behavior-rules.

Today it is no more pork in school cafeterias, tomorrow sharia will be implemented!

We are not only to tolerate the immigrants habits, we are to observe their rules!

But if you travel to Saudi Arabia, your wife has to wear the veil, nobody will comply with your desires.

It is NOT about blind racism.
It is NOT about hatred towards foreigners.
No, it is about OUR HOMELANDS being destroyed, and we as peoples, too!

Only recently, the German parliament has passed a law, which allows domestic military deployment in case of catastrophic conditions.

According to EU law insurgents can be shot!

These measures are not taken, because politicians fear the millions of immigrants in our countries, but in case we object to our displacement by alien peoples!

That is exactly what is happening, we are displaced, we are to be replaced!

German politicians openly talk about the dilution of the German people and that Europe needs more diversity!

Sarkozy urged the French to more race-mixing, lest they would get into trouble!

You are not insane, if you feel there are only immigrants everywhere.

You are not hate-filled, if you notice that many immigrants do not conform to our rules.

And you are not racist, if you want the immigrants to go back to their own countries.

The slogan of the major Turkish newspaper is, "Turkey for the Turks"!

Turkey for the Turks?

Yes!

But for all of them!

Including those who are here!

Shoo, home you go!

And social welfare for Turks only in Turkey!

Friday, 5 October 2012

The UK Establishment: Riddled with pædophile scum

The following is republished from The Tap (http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/jimmy-savile-obe-at-last-kids-can-rest.html).  Not only is the late Jimmy Savile exposed as a child molesters; he is but one of many who have infested the 'celebrity' clique who shape the values of the gullible public.  Savile abused children for decades and was protected by the Windsors, and the Government, as well as assorted pædophiles in the police, media and other branches of the Establishment; he was even knighted by the anti-humans who rule our troubled land.  Now that his sickening behaviour has come to light, the hypocrites who hid his crimes, are crawling forth to cry crocodile tears for his victims; victims who truly are victims of those who allowed this vile specimen to indulge his perversion until he finally died.  The UK locks up people for expressing an opinion, but covers-up those who damage children.  It is surely a matter of time before the pædophiles push for the legalisation of their sickness, as they did with homosexuality.  The UK is a very sick land, and it will take a complete physical cleansing of every aspect of society to heal it.  Of course, the powers-that-be will not allow their own to be dealt with in the only way they deserve; there may make a few token arrests, but the Establishment will leave our children vulnerable to those who share their proclivity for sexual degeneracy... . 

With all the people coming forward and alleging that Savile raped or molested them, there is little doubt as to what he was.  What is not coming out is the much bigger story that he was also a procurer.  He supplied vulnerable kids to Prime Ministers, and was also a regular and welcome visitor at The Palace.  No wonder they're running media stories/reports to draw peoples' attention away from the role that Jimmy Savile played as a procurer of children for sexual abuse by others.  They are instead focusing people's attention onto the, by now, obvious and well known fact that he was an abuser in his own right.
Savile entertained and was a star. But he was implicated in things which should have ended his career long ago. Why did Royalty honour him, and are still doing? Why was his contract never stopped at the BBC? The answer is that paedophilia is not considered a crime by the elites. In fact it's one of the ongoing unspoken truths of power in Britain.

I blogged this a week ago, mentioning Jimmy Savile, as sent in by Gordon Logan - as follows -

This was this morning's email from Gordon Logan writing in Beijing.

Hi Tap,

I googled 'northern ireland' Whitelaw paedophile' and found some relevant hits. It's quite well known.

Willie Whitelaw


He may well have been involved in the Northern Ireland children's home scandal. He certainly didn't look normal on TV. Heath was another one. Gross sexual abnormality is a big plus on the CV of British politicians. They're used to push major controversial decisions. Excellent traitors. Very pliable. It used to be referred to as 'lack of moral fibre'.

Winston Churchill


Churchill was another one according to T. Stokes, who worked for MI5. He used to spend a lot of money in Morocco.

Local Government Officials

If you do a search for paedophilia on this site, there's a lot of it in local government.
http://eotp.org

Also here
http://www.no2abuse.com/index.php/blogs/comments/mps-is-any-child-safe-check-this-list-out/

And here.
http://www.whale.to/b/pedophilism_h.html

Edward Heath


You have no doubt heard of the Haut de la Garenne scandal on the Channel Islands. They found the bones of a child that had been 'snuffed'. Heath used to go there on Morning Cloud. Jimmy Saville used to deliver boys at Broadstairs.

Tony Blair



The ones at the top were protected by Blair when Operation Ore hit Westminster. Google 'operation ore' 'cover up' Blair. Blair's governments were packed with perverts, like himself.

In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain’s National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed “under caution” by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair’s government.

However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. Blair cited the impending war in Iraq as a reason for the D-Notice. Police also discovered links between British Labour government paedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal).

Paedophilia to become legal

Paedophiles are the next group of 'persecuted victims' that will become untouchable. Sociologists will refer to criticism of paedophiles as ignorant 'moral panic' and the public will be silenced with new diversity legislation, which all three parties will miraculously support, because they are all managed from behind the scenes. After that, with the poverty that is resulting from the Rothschilds' bailouts, parents will be expected to sell their children into prostitution, as in Thailand, so that progressive politicians like Peter Mandelson can get their hands on them.

Best regards,

Gordon

TAP - horrible topic, but one which explains why our top politicians have mostly been traitors, bar a very few. As you say, Gordon, they are selected because they are child rapists, and have to comply with the wishes of the powerful, or be exposed. The link between Blair's fondness for child abuse and his rush to start the Iraq war is instructive. His using a former child sex slave was his denouement. When Gordon Logan revealed that Blair had borrowed one of George Bush's favourite male prostitutes at The White House, Johnnie Gosch (Guckert, Gannon), the Germans were no longer willing to back his bid to be President of Europe.

That said, Belgium does appear to be a world centre for child abuse and abduction. The EU runs on paedophilia as well.

Why did Savile's colleague announce his death in 1994?


One of Britain's most famous 'characters', Jimmy Savile, at the infamous Haut de la Garenne children's home in Jersey which he claimed to have never visited.

Direct link to documentary on pædophilia in the Channel Islands: http://youtu.be/lq6lJsBz9UY


Selected comments:

Savile joked about his crimes on the programme, Have I Got News For You, but these were edited out by the BBC.  For text of his remarks, visit: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rogerb/jokes/HIGNFY.txt


Jews are a majority in our courts. Look at Wall, Baker, etc. I even went to Raymond Tooth for help not knowing he was Jewish (I know him from horseracing). I have been on your Hodge/Oppenheimer blog. I think this is where it is stemming from, don't you?
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Judaism/talmud_child_sex.htm

For some  more very interesting comments, visit the original article at: http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/jimmy-savile-obe-at-last-kids-can-rest.html




Thursday, 6 September 2012

UK MP prioritises Palestine over UK issues

It is common knowledge that the Members of Parliament in the UK are self-serving careerists.  However, occasionally, an MP may do something which is worthy of attention.  I would like to thank the individual who presented me with the latest propaganda material which is currently being pushed by the Halifax MP, Linda Riordan.  For obvious reasons, the individual wishes to remain anonymous.

The Labour Party MP, Riordan, has returned from a fact-finding mission to Palestine.  To quote her own literature, it was 'one of her key election promises..to continue to highlight the plight of the Palestinian people.'  Commendable as Mzzzz Riordan's efforts on behalf of the Palestinian people are, it is remarkable that she chose to highlight Palestine as a key priority, when one would consider that dealing with the heroin epidemic, mass unemployment, and general poverty of Halifax, may just have been of more concern to the people of Halifax, than the poverty of a people in the Middle East?  

Halifax is a town which has suffered greatly at the hands of immigrant pædophiles who are well known for 'grooming' young girls (some pre-teenage).  What the term 'grooming' is used to hide, is the fact that ever younger girls are being given free heroin, then once addicted, are being made to prostitute themselves for the heroin dealers.  The fact that all the heroin dealers who engage in this activity in Halifax are Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chechen and other assorted Muslims, only helps the pædophile scum.  It is common practice for the dealers to terrify impressionable girls into taking their foul product, and to having sex with them, by using the dreaded term 'racist' against those who resist.  Linda Riordan is an active crusader for multi-culturalism in Halifax (but for indigenous rights in Palestine!) and as such unwittingly helps those who prey on indigenous children.

Linda Riordan's campaign for Palestine is laudable.  However, what she proposes - a two state solution - gives de-facto acceptance to the Zionist State, and to International Talmudic Imperialism.  As can be seen by Riordan's relentless grovelling to the Muslim community in Halifax, and her obsession with multi-culturalism, should her objective be achieved, and a Palestinian state is born as a neighbour to Israel, this will in no way signal that the Palestinian refugees in the UK will have to return whence they came.  It is interesting that the multi-cultists in Parliament can campaign for indigenous rights in places such as Palestine and Tibet, and then with no sense of hypocrisy, bee vehemently opposed to indigenous rights in the UK and across Europe; the concept of which they refer to as racism.

Yes, an end to Zionist Imperialism is important, and yes, Palestine must be liberated.  However, the Two-State Solution, is no solution to the expansionist dogma of Zionism, only a temporary setback.  The real solution, the total relocation of the Jewish Israeli population to Birobidjan - the first and only authentic Jewish State - is a prerequisite for world peace.  It is right to highlight the plight of the Palestinians, but only in the context of a demand for national freedom for all indigenous peoples worldwide.  That is a freedom which recognises that only by reuniting every people with their own territory, can the natural order be restored, and a world of mutual respect, be built.  Linda Riordan's shameless propagandising for Islamic rights in Europe, puts her well within the camp of the internationalist destroyers of freedom.  

The leaflet which has been pushed through doors in Halifax, can be found fully duplicated at the following link.  As far as the Palestinian issue is concerned, the leaflet is praiseworthy.  However, when one considers how devoted Riordan is to crushing dissent from within the indigenous population of the town she allegedly represents, her ability to simultaneously  fight for the rights of the Palestinians against those who have invaded their land, is breathtaking.  The leaflet is worth reading.  It can be found at:

http://newsfromatlantis.freeforums.org/uk-mp-prioritises-palestine-over-uk-issues-t1109.html

Saturday, 25 August 2012

Anders Breivik: A Gift for Internationalism

As Anders Breivik begins his 21-year sentence for murdering 77 people in Oslo, in five-star luxury accommodation, what will be the repercussions for those who oppose the drive to a single global slave state?

Breivik has condemned all who oppose Internationalism, to be regarded as 'terrorists'.  His final words in court were:

"I would like to end with an expression of regret and apologise to militant nationalists in Norway and Europe.  I would like to apologise for not having killed more people”. 

In his final words, the man who is alleged to have single-handedly managed to bomb Oslo and gun down scores of people on a nearby island with no help, and no State orchestration (a near impossible feat), has handed the Internationalist enemy of humanity, a gold-plated gift.  By directly associating nationalism with murder, he has tarred all who stand for the restoration of national freedom as potential murderers.

Specifically, Breivik spoke of nationalists in Europe, thus narrowing the label of homicidal extremists to Europeans.  He could have left his fake apology as one to nationalists in general, thus including people such as the Black Panthers, Rastafari Movement, Free Tibet campaigners, Zionists fighting for a mono-ethnic Jewish-State, Albanian 'Kosovan' Statists, Turkish occupiers of Cyprus, Arab Libyan ethnic cleansers of Black Africans, South African ethnic cleansers of Europeans, Kurdistani home-rule activists, etc etc.  But no, he linked 'militant nationalism' exclusively with White Europeans. 

The Oslo tragedy was an internationalist-crafted massacre.  The whole affair reeks of Security Service involvement.  Breivik (and his unknown accomplices) butchered ordinary people, in order to bring the idea of opposition to the international order into disrepute.  Whether that opposition takes the form of States-Rights within the European Union, a campaign for the establishment of a single European nation for Europeans, a free nation of Kernow, or whatever, now thanks to Breivik (or more realistically, thanks to those who control him), all reasonable demands to take control of our own lives, and not be subject to the diktat of international finance and the will of multi-national corporations, have been forever libelled as expressions of hatred.  This will, of course, be interpreted in the USA to include those who believe in the US Constitution, as 'Breivik-like terrorists.

Interestingly, the trial in Oslo found Breivik to be sane.  Can we take this as acknowledging that a belief in Internationalism is the product of a diseased mind?  Or is this just an excuse to make anti-Internationalism (Nationalism, Patriotism, States' Rights etc) a criminal offence worldwide?

Breivik murdered more than the 77 victims of Oslo; he murdered freedom itself.  21 years in a prison which has better living conditions than most of us could ever achieve under the current economic climate, is an absolute disgrace.  His 'punishment' looks more like a reward for service to his masters.

Friday, 20 July 2012

If Pigs could fly, they wouldn't need helicopters

In the UK, the footsoldiers of the State are once again whining that their jobs are in peril.  According to the State Broadcaster, the BBC, three Police forces are likely to have their ability to arrest criminals hampered by the cuts in funding from central government.  The BBC propaganda machine has issued fear-mongering stories to terrify the people into believing that the only way the people can be safe in the face of cuts in the number of police officers, is for the forces of 'law and order' to be given ever more power over the population.  If one believed the lies of the BBC, one would think that the people of the UK were in dire danger of being swamped by crime, and that only the marvellous boys and girls in blue stand in the way of the total demise of our civilisation.  This idea would be amusing, but for the fact that the police themselves have enforced the policies of government which have done so much damage to our culture and our nation.  The police do not exist to protect us from harm, but to protect our enemies from us. 

In the UK, the færytale image of the loveable Bobby on the Beat is still presented as reality to the nostalgic public.  The Bobbies of old were not loveable, and only appear so because the new weaponised police are so undeniably vile.  The original Bobbies were brought in to give a more human face to the forces of law and order after the government used the military to murder the common people of Manchester in the infamous Peterloo Massacre.  The whole point of an unarmed police force was to ensure that the government could not readily murder the ordinary people who disagreed with the policies and actions of the Establishment.  The Bobbies of old were brutal thugs, but at least the chances of being killed by them was less than in the days when the army openly did the government's dirty work.  The new generation of armed police are an insult to those who died in Manchester, and to the many good people - including the Luddites - who lost their lives fighting against the excesses of government and big business.

In Northern Ireland, the people have long understood the real nature of the police.  The former RUC routinely used rubber bullets against the people, and often without provocation.  It is said that Northern Ireland has been a testing ground for modern policing, and this has been proven correct with the revelations that the government has spent over £400,000 on imported Rubber Bullets to shoot the citizens should they become angry at the austerity policies of the State, or should the economic hardships spur them to loot for food and essential commodities.  When I write that the government has spent over £400,000, I should write that we taxpayers have.  The armed police are getting ever more dangerous weapons to use against us, and we are paying for them.

Rubber Bullets are dangerous.  They have been used to kill protestors in the past, and their increased use will only lead to more deaths.  They are a part of a lethal array of material which the police have access to, alongside CS Gas, Tasers, Pepper Spray, Side-handled Batons, and training in the use of extreme violence.  These are nothing in comparison with the latest addition to the police arsenal.  The police are to be given access to assault rifles, complete with grenade launchers, silencers, and changeable sights to allow their use as sniper rifles.  So far, the number of assault rifles ordered stands at 30,000, but this number will almost certainly be followed by more.  Already at airport and seaports, the police patrol with military weaponry.  Before long this will be the norm across the UK.

Assault rifles with sniper capability, and silencers?  The British people have already been disarmed.  We are not even allowed to carry knives for cutting the cores from apples, so an armed police force is even less justifiable than ever before.  The Bobby on the Beat is dead.  The new Police is the military arm of the State, and we are the enemy.

On the 15th November 2012, the British people are to be given the right to elect their local chiefs of police; intriguingly titled Police and Crime Commissioners (surely a Freudian slip?)  

Considering that the elections to Westminster and Bruxelles/Strasburg are about as worthwhile as a vote for the X-Factor, why should the rolling out of the faux democratic system into the area of Law and Order be any different?  Will the candidates include those who promise to demilitarise the police and allow the people to defend themselves?  Will anyone be allowed to stand who speaks openly about the need to arrest the real criminals in the nation; including War Criminals Tony Blair, William Hague and many in Parliament?  Will the Crime Commissioners' role be given the necessary scope to deal with illegal immigration and racially motivated offences carried out by sections of the guest population against the indigenous folk to which the British Isles truly belong?  Will the financial crimes of the Banking elite be called to account, or would mention of the personages behind them be forbidden lest it provoke anti-Semitism?

In a time when every penny is being squeezed from the people to compensate the Bankers for the losses they made whilst gambling on the Stock Exchange, the last thing we need is another set of pointless elections and another tier of bureaucracy which we will have to pay for.  Surely rather than simply declare that we are to have another layer of (s)elected officialdom, the 'democratic' thing to do would have been to ask us if we wanted more parasites to bleed us dry?  Of course we were not asked, because we would have said no!

We are told every day that we need to cut costs, and to save money.  We are never allowed to mention that the austerity plans exist solely to impoverish us, and to proletarianise the entire country.  We are forbidden to discuss the people who are gaining from our misery, or why this financial situation has been engineered to begin with.  It is an affront to our intelligence that we are to be given another expensive layer of unnecessary bureaucracy at a time when vital services and jobs are being axed.

The politicians know that they are squeezing us to the point of death, hence the vast network of CCTV surveillance, and the demands that all ISP addresses are fitted with monitoring devices to ensure we do not ask for more than the scraps from the tables of the bloated Establishment.  The real reason for the militarisation of the police is obvious; the Establishment view us as the enemy, and they are more than happy to use 'every means necessary' to keep us down, including killing us.  The police and crime commissioners are a farce, and provide the circus element of British politics.  The Ruling Class seem to have forgotten that the strategy of Bread and Circuses does not work when the Establishment arms its police thugs to take the Bread from the people.

Does anyone seriously doubt that the Police State is already upon us?  All it needs is an excuse to gain absolute control; we can be assured that the Establishment has already prepared one.

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

Supreme Court in London: A Jewish Closed Shop

There is a temptation to see the UK as a country under Jewish occupation.  When one looks at the over-representation of Jews in Finance, Government, the Media etc, it does appear that the Ruling Class of the UK is not only socio-economically dominant over the rest of the population, it is also ethnically distinct.  I am not for a moment trying to say that all Jews are a part of the Establishment, or that there are no poor and downtrodden Jews; I know a fair number of Jews (by ancestry) who are struggling to get by just as everyone else is, and they certainly are not a part of the despotic elite. 

Whilst it is ridiculous to group together all people who happen to have some Jewish ancestry, as exploiters of the common people, there is a certain amount of truth in the idea that the Jewish elite is synonymous with the UK Establishment.  The Monarchy and Aristocracy are so interwoven with the Jewish banking families, that it is nigh on impossible to separate them.  Whilst the Jewish infiltration of the Ruling Class is obvious, we need to be careful to separate the 'little Jew' from those who rule over all of us (and exploit the little Jew as much as they exploit the Goyim), but this should not cow us into silence as to the obvious racial and/or religious character of those in positions of power.

In the UK, the Media is thoroughly Zionist; the ruling families are of Jewish stock; the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition are Jewish; the economy is squarely in the hands of Jewish financiers; the servile political attitude to Israel would make the sycophantic philo-Semitic men and women in Washington DC blush.

All who comment on the Jewish domination of the UK are accused of anti-Semitism, and are jeered as fantasists.  One body which cannot be smeared by such infantile name-calling is my favourite Kosher read, the Jewish Chronicle.  The Jewish Chronicle has confirmed quite openly what non-Kosher researchers are vilified for stating; the Judiciary is dominated by Jews!  So, not only the Legislative and Executive branches of government are Jewish-controlled, the Judiciary is also.  As the Jewish Chronicle boasts, the previous, current, and next incumbent of the Office of Chief Justice of England and Wales, was, is and will be, a Jew.  If any other source provided such information, it would instantly be attacked by Searchlight, the UAF and myriad other self-righteous anti-indigenous organisations.  However, it is the Jewish Chronicle which has stated what many dare not.

The following two articles from the Chronicle throw a spotlight on the Jewish domination of the Supreme Court, and by extension the entire legal system of not only England and Wales, but the entire United Kingdom.  They illustrate how the Goyim are not masters in their own house, but are subject to the rule of the self-Chosen people.  These are not anti-Semitic fantasies spread by (boo hiss) evil fascists, but are facts as told by the main newspaper of the Jewish community....



http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/how-jewish-is/how-jewish-lord-chief-justice-phillips

The post of Lord Chief Justice has been in Jewish hands before: the previous incumbent, Lord Woolf, was born into a Newcastle Jewish family. But Lord Phillips, who steps down in October, is from solid Anglo-Saxon stock. Or is he?

Against:

Just take a look at the name. Nicholas Addison Phillips is not a Yiddishe moniker. Neither is his background remotely Jewish. He had a genteel upbringing attending Bryanston School in Dorset before serving in the Royal Navy, where he was a commissioned officer, noch. In fact, when he qualified as a barrister, Lord Phillips specialised in maritime law. We Jews like to wander, but we tend to do it on dry land. There seems nothing remotely kosher about him.

For:

And yet, in a speech this week — admittedly given at the East London Muslim Centre — he spoke of his maternal grandparents, two young immigrants to this country. Said Lord Phillips: “They were Sephardic Jews and had eloped to this country from Alexandria because they understood that England was a country in which they would enjoy freedom.” One Jewish barrister was staggered when he heard the news, saying: “It’s like the Pope announcing he’s Jewish.” And yet the signs are there if you look for them. Lord Phillips is, after all a lawyer; he lives in Hampstead; and he has quite bushy eyebrows. Weird that no one guessed before, then.

Verdict:

Jewish as charged, m’lud.

So we say he is 88% Jewish



http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/69907/lord-neuberger-head-supreme-court

The head of the civil judiciary has been named as the next Supreme Court president.

Lord Neuberger's appointment as the most senior judge in the UK was confirmed on Thursday. He will be sworn in on October 1, succeeding Lord Phillips.

Lord Neuberger, 64, is the brother-in-law of Baroness Neuberger, senior rabbi of the Reform's flagship West London congregation.

The former David Neuberger began his career working for N M Rothschild and was called to the bar in 1974. In 1996 he became a Chancery division judge and an Appeal Court judge in 2007. Two years later he was named Master of the Rolls.

Although he was critical of the decision to abolish the role of the House of Lords as the UK's most senior court, he said he was committed to his new place at the helm of the supreme court.

He said: "I will do my best to ensure that it continues to play its proper role in upholding the rule of law, and applying and developing the law in a coherent and principled and practical way, appropriate for today's world."

Saturday, 14 July 2012

Thought Police brutalise tax payers

In the UK, we have just witnessed a ridiculous prosecution for thought crimes; a prosecution which may be the most expensive case to date for n offence which starts and ends in name-calling.  The England football player, John Terry, was charged with racially assaulting a fellow footballer, by calling him a 'Black Cunt'.  The 'crime' was picked up by an off-duty policeman who was watching the football match at home on his television, and managed to lip read what John Terry had said.  Like a good little Bolshevist, the Neo-Stalinist copper, immediately called the Crown's Persecution Service, to inform on the footballer for the heinous crime of transgressing the commandments of Political Correctness.

The ridiculous prosecution of John Terry has cost the British taxpayer £500,000, having taken an amazing nine months to pass through the legal system.  The court case has been high profile due to John Terry being a footballer, but the case is only one of many cases brought by the CPS by virtue of punishing people for thought crimes; for dissenting against the orthodoxy of political correctness. 

What is interesting is that the name-calling went unnoticed save for the watchful eyes of an off duty policeman, who, thanks to his obedience to the diktat of his masters, now owes every tax-payer in the UK for the money which the political commissars have stolen from each of us for this case alone.  Should anyone know of the thought policeman's name and address, wouldn't it be justice for him to be issued demands to repay us for what he has caused to be stolen?  When divided amongst the tax-paying population, the money stolen may not appear much, but when considered alongside all the political prosecutions which we have been forced to pay for, the sum stolen from us is considerable.  In the case of Jewish taxpayers, maybe the thought policeman would like to pay reparations far exceeding the sum owed to each Goy?  Of course, the thought police are not subject to the same regulations as the rest of us.  The snivelling excuse for a man, whose political actions have so libelled the indigenous population, is likely to be promoted for his service to the Establishment.  In a sane society his petty-mindedness and complete lack of common sense, would have been cause to dismiss him as unfit to serve in an organisation which officially serves the people.

The CPS has yet again proven that it does not exist to see that criminals are prosecuted, but rather that its purpose is to ensure that the people are forever kept down, in obedience to those who believe they have a right to tell us how to think, feel, act and speak.  In a democracy, the people have the right to freedom of thought, speech and expression.  The actions of the CPS prove that the UK is not a democracy, and that the people are not free.  The CPS act as Communist Propaganda Security, ensuring that no amount of lunacy is ever challenged.  In times of ever harsher austerity measures the CPS is a waste of money which should be abolished immediately.  Of course, the austerity measures are really measures to transfer wealth from the impoverished people to the rich bankers and their ilk, and naturally the idea is to destroy the morale of the people, as well as stealing our money.  The John Terry case is yet another assault on the psyche of the indigenous people, and of course is designed to inflame the guest population so as to keep the Establishment safe to ride roughshod over all of us whilst we fight one another.

For a peaceful solution to the ills afflicting the UK, the CPS must be closed down forever, and all of the politically correct multi-culti legislation must be repealed.  Our guest population must be encouraged to return to their homelands, with incentives such as financial support for their real homes, and an end to the imperialistic wars which have driven them to our shores.  Naturally, preference in employment for the indigenous population, and an end to benefits for non-indigenous folk, would also help to make life at home a better option than life in the UK.  

John Terry is a foul-mouthed oaf who needs to learn that name-calling is infantile; but being stupid and rude is not reason for prosecution, for if it was, Prince Philip would forever be in the dock.  The CPS and the Thought Police are the real enemies of freedom, and the case against John Terry has proven (yet again) that we do not need such organisations on our shores.  Nine months and half a million pounds dedicated to name-calling, is sheer lunacy.  It is time for sanity to be restored and for the lunatics who currently misrule us to be put in safe institutions, where they can harm no one; whether they should be given padded cells, is open to debate.

Friday, 11 May 2012

UK Police protest about pay, but let country rot.

Around 30,000 off duty police officers marched against privatisation yesterday.  This received a little attention in the mainstream media, but nowhere near as much as it really deserves.

The UK is split administratively into Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the joined countries of England and Wales.  In England and Wales, it is illegal for members of the police force to strike.  Yesterday, 30,000 serving officers used a day of annual leave to march in protest at the actions of the government.  This is as close to a strike as the police are allowed to get, and considering staffing regulations, the fact that so many police men and women took the same day off for the same purpose, is an indication of just how much discontent there is in the police ranks.  If striking was legal, it is likely that the policing of the UK would have been brought to a standstill, and the army would have had to have been used.  30,000 is a vast number when one considers the permissible level of absence through simultaneous annual leave.

When I worked in the public service, I was occasionally seconded to work alongside the police, in police stations.  Contrary to the rumour-mongering of malcontents in the so-called far-right in the UK, I was not, never have been, and never will be, a policeman.  My dealings with the police were strictly as a government worker employed in a civilian capacity.

Working alongside the police gave me the opportunity to get to know some of them on a basis as close to friendship as can be had between a policeman and a civilian.  There is definitely a division between police and non-police which cannot be crossed.  In my conversations I learnt that the police are not as solidly behind the government as the media would have us believe.

Not many years ago, the police had their own drinking clubs inside their police stations.  Due to the fact that the people do not trust them (because they are never really off duty and will arrest anyone for anything), the police cannot go into pubs in the way that most people can.  Thus they had their own bars where they could wind down and socialise with one another after a shift.  The politically correct penny-pinchers in Whitehall have removed all such clubs and bars.

The job of the police is a stressful one, due to the reality that they enforce laws which shouldn't exist.  For some of the police, enforcing political correctness causes internal conflict, as they know that what they are enforcing is wrong, but are conditioned to obey orders.  This can result in marital problems when the police vent their anger at the system out on their spouses.  To help alleviate these problems, the police had accommodation in their police stations where they could stay temporarily if home life was bad, or if they needed somewhere to stop following a de-stressing night in the police social club.  Of course, the Whitehall bureaucrats deemed this an unacceptable financial expense, and such accommodation was turned into office space or storage.  Again, this has irked the police.  They are expected to enforce ever more unpopular and unjustifiable political laws, and their support base has been taken away from them.

One of the most unbelievable aspects of penny-pinching by the State is the use of undercover cars.  The police used to hire fleets of vehicles for undercover work.  They were easily spotted due to having extra radio ærials and other visible alterations, but they were still hired cars for police use only.  The government in its infinite wisdom has reduced the number of hired cars available for undercover work, and as a substitute in many cases the police have to use their own personal cars!  Thus, as well as the extra expense, a police officer now faces the possibility of someone identifying where he or she lives by the car parked outside, and of course then it only takes a little surveillance to know when the officer is at work.  The penny-pinchers have put the homes of the police at risk.

People tend to join the police because it pays well.  There isn't the motive of duty to country which inspires people to join the military, but by and large there has traditionally been an aspect of wanting to uphold the laws of the country.  For older police officers, the laws to be enforced were such as stopping thieves, rapists and murderers.  For those joining the police today, they are more likely to be told to arrest thought criminals then those who pose a danger to society.  Indeed the refusal of the police to arrest Pakistani rape gangs for fear of offending people on racial or religious grounds, shews how debased policing has become.  

On my visits to police stations one constant theme of conversation amongst the older officers was how they hated the way the police force has become politicised, and that they were only still in the police because they hadn't served long enough to retire; which they would be doing at the first possible opportunity.  I must admit that I didn't speak much with the younger officers who seemed quite content to act as politically correct foot soldiers.

The Police have implemented the multi-culti society.  It is they who have arrested people for having politically incorrect opinions.  The Police have enforced the internationalisation of the UK, with shameful acts of aggression against the British people, such as the brutalisation of the Miners in the 1980s strike, which allowed for the sell off of our coal resources to foreign investors, who simply closed the pits and threw our people out of work.  The Police could have refused to enforce laws which have destroyed indigenous communities; they could have refused to aid the imprisonment (and on occasion murder) of decent people who love their country and people.  They chose otherwise.

The strike yesterday was about pay and working conditions.  The Police have happily taken their thirty pieces of silver when beating striking miners, dockers, car-workers etc so that the Establishment can destroy their jobs and export industrial production to slave-state China.  Now, the Police Force (or as the politically correct crowd call it, Service) is being privatised, they find themselves on the receiving end of State despotism.  It is highly likely the companies such as G4S will take over much of the police work.  They have already taken over the front line administrative and reception jobs, although the police didn't feel it necessary to strike when their civilian colleagues jobs were threatened.

Yesterday's strike was a positive thing insofar as it proved that even the uniformed thugs of the State will only be pushed so far before they protest.  However, the failure of the police to make a stand for anything of substance beyond what effects them financially, proves the calibre of such people.  The old coppers who protected the people from rapists, thieves and murderers have given way to the new materialists who enjoy the power of brutalising the people for their political masters, and are more than happy to do nothing as foreign colonists attack our children and flood our country with heroin.

If the Police had taken a stand for decency and refused to attack strikers and protesters, then they would be held in high esteem.  Instead they are held beneath contempt, and frankly if they have to wear corporate logos on their uniforms, and have their pay cut to the levels they have helped enforce on the rest of us, they only have themselves to blame.  They could have stopped this nightmare, but they acted selfishly and helped build our politically correct prison country.  Now they are getting a taste of what they have meted out to the rest of us. Yesterday's protests are a good thing, but they are decades too late.

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

Asian Rape Gang groom White Children - Police say it isn't racist!

Not far from where I live, across the Pennines in Rochdale, the above eight Pakistani rapists are due for sentencing for grooming White girls.  A ninth man from Afghanistan is also charged with the same offence.  These rapists follow on from over 60 other Pakistani rapists who have also been convicted for grooming White children.  In every case, the perpetrators are Pakistanis, Afghans or other Muslims from Asia, and in every case, the victims are White.  The Greater Manchester Police have declared that these bastards who prey on indigenous children, and never on Muslim ones, are not racist! 

The 'men' who have perpetrated the latest offences are:
  • Kabeer Hassan, 25, of Lacrosse Avenue, Oldham, who was also convicted of one count of rape
  • Abdul Aziz, 41, of Armstrong Hurst Close, Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking for sexual exploitation
  • Abdul Rauf, 43, of Darley Road and Adil Khan, 42, of Oswald Street, both of Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking a child within the UK for sexual exploitation
  • Mohammed Sajid, 35, of Jephys Street, Rochdale, also convicted of one count of rape, sexual activity with a girl under 16 and trafficking for sexual exploitation
  • Mohammed Amin, 45, of Falinge Road, Falinge, also convicted of sexual assault
  • Hamid Safi, 22, of Tweedale Street, Rochdale, also convicted of trafficking girls for the purposes of sexual exploitation
  • Abdul Qayyum, 44, of Ramsay Street, Rochdale
All eight of the above are Pakistani; all of them Muslim; all the victims White and indigenous; Police say race is not involved!

Where I live, we have gangs of rapists who get White girls hooked on heroin and crack cocaine, and make them pay for the drugs by turning them to prostitution.  There is a girl in my area who was snared into this despicable life when she was 10 years old.  Sadly this isn't unusual.  In the case in court today, the girls were given drugs and forced to have sex.  When they refused, they were beaten.

The laughing liberal lunatics who made much of the EDL member who used the word Muslamic for Islamic, and spoke of 'Muslamic' Rape Gangs, are busy apologising for the Muslim rapists.  Instead of being honest about a serious problem the liberal mafia are looking for excuses to turn the blame onto society as a whole, and the girls themselves.

Link to video: http://youtu.be/pb9L8feiY5w


We all know that the police are racist scum who enforce the anti-indigenous agenda with the zeal typical of traitors. There have been ridiculous prosecutions of Whites for offences such as racially aggravated revving of a car, yet when White children are specifically targeted for rape and drug addiction, the police turn a blind eye.  The police are accomplices to every case of anti-White child abuse, rape etc perpetrated by Asians, which will come in the wake of this decision to label the abuse of White children as no big deal.

The Labour MP, Keith Vaz, himself a Muslim, has all-but pronounced that White girls ask for abuse, as they are easy; slags; asking for it.  This is the joy of multi-culturalism and the Zionisation of England.  The schools and the State Broadcaster (BBC) teach political correctness to children.  They teach that children must be sexually active, and must experiment with sex with everyone they can get it from - male , female, black, white, animal, vegetable etc.  Propaganda such as the BBC News, Eastenders etc teach that the worst offence in the world is 'racism', thus refusing sex with non-Whites is a racist offence.  Sections of the Muslim community who believe that is is acceptable to rape non-Muslims are not the only ones to blame for these offences; the liberal Establishment who created multi-culturalism and the concept of 'racism' are equally, nay more responsible for the destruction of the lives of White children.

I worked with a Pakistani man who beat his sister so badly that she required hospital treatment.  His justification was that she was in a relationship with a White man.  He worked alongside me in a job which required a full enhanced disclosure of any criminal offences and arrests.  He was not dismissed from the public service; he was not punished at all.  If he had been White and he had beaten his sister for having a relationship with a Pakistani, he would still be in prison!  Again, the police and the State decided that his crime wasn't racially motivated, although it couldn't have been anything but!

On BBC Radio 5 this morning, the Rochdale crimes were discussed, and all manner of excuses brought out to make the anti-White crimes appear to not be racially motivated.  There are many Chinese, African and Indian (Hindu) girls in southern Lancashire (so-called Greater Manchester), yet only indigenous White girls were targeted.  How more racially motivated does this need to be for the police to treat anti-indigenous crimes as racist?

People have been prosecuted for comments on Twitter or Facebook which have been construed as racist.  The failure of the police to treat the preying on White children as the racially-motivated crimes they are, is sickening.  They deserve the epithet filth, although to call them pigs is unkind to the animals who far exceed them in intelligence and decency.

On the BBC programme, an Imam working in Keighley claimed that the reason for the grooming of White girls is that the poorly done to Asian men have sexually unfulfilled arranged marriages, and thereby have no alternative but to use White girls, who are easy and available.  If this is the case, then surely the presence of people who have a religion and culture which puts our children in danger, should be kept out of our country?  No?  This is another example of the enriching quality of multi-culturalism, and, (we are told) we must learn to live with it!!

The solution to grooming, and all sex offences is to abandon the sexualisation of children in the media and State 'education' system, and to treat children as children.  In a word we must reverse the politically correct policies of government, and expel those who have sought to undermine our culture and our way of life.  Many of those who are responsible for the destruction of our land could go to Israel to wallow in their insanity.  As for the Muslim colonies, they have no reason to be here and should be relocated to Pakistan etc.  If we will not stand up and speak out in defence for our children for fear of being labelled as thought criminals, then what will we stand up for?

No doubt the politically-motivated police reading this will consider defence of the indigenous population as 'racist', whereas attacks against us our not!  That just shews how debased the police are, and that they form a occupation force for the destruction of Europe.  Traitors throughout history have earned the same fate.  If the police continue to persecute their own people, sooner or later they will reap what they have sewn.  So coppers - are you going to continue betraying your people, or will you wake up and fight for us?  You choose your fate by your deeds.

Monday, 23 April 2012

Microchipping England's dogs - then the rest of the population

In the UK, the countries of England and Wales are to continue spearheading the roll out of the Police State.  We are blanketed in CCTV; we have measures to spy on our every electronic communication (email, sms text, web visit, telephone, et al); we have an army of citizens given the PACE powers of the police; we have a culture of 'grassing' - informing on one another.  This we have already in what is laughingly referred to as a free country!

The ruling power have turned the old fashioned police constable armed only with his truncheon, into a virtual robocop, with side-armed baton, pepper spray, CS gas, Taser, real gun on demand and, (whilst not beating and persecuting us), full CCTV to monitor the people.  Now the Police State has turned its attention to household pets.

Legislation being announced today will require all newborn puppies to be microchipped.  This will be extended to compel all dog owners to microchip their pets.  The rationale for this is that there are a few dangerous dogs, and that if all dogs are microchipped, the dogs can be destroyed and the owners fined.  The cost of the microchips will be the responsibility of the dog owners, and of course the chips will be subject to taxation.  Kerching!  In order to stop a handful of dog owners allowing their dogs to attack people and animals, every single dog in England and Wales must be microchipped.  This will earn the exchequer a very tidy sum of money, and in the democratic UK, there will be no choice but to pay for the chips and obey the diktat of Westminster.

Are there dangerous dogs in the UK?  Indeed there are some, but they are very much a minority.  Are there irresponsible dog owners who allow their animals to attack people, cats, other dogs etc?  Yes there are.  Will microchipping legislation make those who mistreat dogs change their ways?  Of course it won't!  Just as with the laws preventing the ownership of firearms and knives, which has only helped to disarm people so they cannot defend themselves, laws to stop people using dogs as weapons will not effect those who do not obey the law in any case.

What the legislation will do is to raise money for the robbers in Westminster, and increase the powers of the State.  The police and those with PACE powers will be given power to interrogate people to see if their dogs are chipped.  They will have to be equipped with devices to scan dogs for microchips.  The microchips will contain a range of identifying information.  The dog issue is merely a front to something far more sinister.

How long will it be before the chipping of dogs is hailed as a success in curbing canine crime?  We have recently had the absurd spectacle of a dog owner being prosecuted for letting her dog foul the pavement, with the evidence against her being the DNA extracted from the dog fæces!  It will surely become mandatory for the dogs' DNA to be logged on the database linked to the microchip.  The 'success' of DNA evidence will inevitably be used to justify recording the DNA of all people living in the UK, and of course, will be included in the mandatory ID Cards which we are soon to be forced to have (and pay for ourselves).  ID Cards can be lost, so surely it will be logical for ID Cards to be replaced by microchips.

The State is now pushing microchips in dogs, but this is a ruse to mandate microchipping of humans.  They will justify this invasion of our very humanity by claiming that missing children can be more easily found if they are chipped, or that it will make purchasing safer as we will be able to use our microchips to verify our identity, thus preventing fraud or the use of stolen credit cards.  This will be sold to the people in such a way that they will clamour to be chipped out of fear.

Make no mistake, the Establishment view us like dogs and the chipping of animals is but a step towards the real objective which is the chipping of people, complete with inbuilt GPS monitoring to finally destroy any vestige of freedom.  Microchipped pets are more prone to cancer than those which are not chipped.  The security given to pet owners if an animal goes missing is negligible and does not justify the expense or the damage to the pet's health. 

Right now on the Government propaganda broadcaster, the BBC, there is a debate as to whether chipping is a good thing, and of course the debate is rigged to be 100% favourable, with no dissent whatsoever.  The only difference in opinion is as to how harshly the owners of those who do not take the chip should be punished.  This is a serious issue, and one we dismiss at our peril.  The microchip for people is on its way, and if we accept it, we are finished as free humans, and the agenda of turning us literally into cattle (Goyim) will be complete.