Imagine England free from the decadent influence of Hollywood and the Zionist media which attacks us from occupied America! Isn't it a dream worth forging into a reality?
Friday, 29 August 2008
The Futhorc
Imagine England free from the decadent influence of Hollywood and the Zionist media which attacks us from occupied America! Isn't it a dream worth forging into a reality?
Thursday, 28 August 2008
Agents Provocateur at work
Jones' stated purpose was to expose Malkin's support of the neo-con agenda of butchering enemies across the globe and imprisoning American and British civilians who cannot be butchered so easily. Malkin arranged for her stooges to chant 'Kill Michelle Malkin' to discredit Alex Jones and take attention away from her blood lust, which extends to people in her country of abode. Malkin regularly publishes articles demanding that ordinary citizens be interned in concentration camps if they fail to support the regime. How democratic is that!
Alex Jones is himself a questionable character, heavily implicated in the Zionist-controlled fake opposition. As has been the method throughout history, the powers-that-be contoll both sides of the debate. Alex Jones' tactic of forcing a physical confrontation has inevitably led to accusations that Jones and those who side with him favour violence. On the whole most people who oppose globalism do so out of love for their families and their nations. Seeing violence occuring in their name will damage their commitment to the struggle.
It could be argued that people who are awakening to the lies of the globalists will do independent research and see Malkin for the beast she is, and that the mindless morons who get their news from the establishment media without question, are lost as fighters for a free world. That these types are content with their lot as long as they have bread and circuses (burgers and baseball) is true. However as life gets harder economically, they too may awaken. All Jones has managed to do is keep the TV viewers glued to the screen a bit longer.
Who is worse - Jones or Malkin? The fact is, both of them are aiding the Zionist globalist machine and should be treated as working for the benefit of the same anti-national agenda. Beware all agents provocateur - especially those who claim to be on our side.
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
Stasi Britain a reality
This Soviet style policing was used in the USSR and Eastern Bloc where everyone was a potential agent of the State, and fear was used to control the people. At least in those nations the people knew they were being controlled. Sadly, in Britain the majority of Sun reading football watching plebeians think that because they have the vote, they are free!
George Orwell was an optimist!
Thursday, 21 August 2008
Multi-Culti destruction of society
In a display of complete disdain for the majority of the inhabitants of the world, the United Nations has decreed that all criticism of Islam must be banned. This, they maintain, is to protect the followers of Islam from people who disagree that the Qur'an is infallible. By extension, the UN edict legally endorses this belief. Of course all other religions (Christianity, Judaism, Shintoism, Wicca etc) are fair game for criticism and no such ban is in place. It should really come as no surprise that the UN reward the intolerance and bigotry of Islam. After all, Islam means submission, and to be a Muslim is to blindly and unquestioningly submit to the authority of a man called Mohammad, who, if he existed at all, was an illiterate paedophile thug who terrorised and murdered to gain power - I can see why the UN like him!
Genuine research into the life of Mohammad is forbidden under Islam, as to do any research and think independently is to doubt the word of Allah. It is highly likely the Qur'an was written by a highly educated Rabbi in Jerusalem in an attempt to unite Judaism and Christianity. It was never intended to be a new religion. All thinking Muslims should study the origin of Islam and having discovered for themselves that 'Mohammad' was a nom de plume, should ditch Islam and embrace Christianity as the fulfillment of Torah Judaism. Likewise Torah Jews should take the logical step and separate from the Talmud Jews whose Pharisaic religion is antithetical to the only religion of the book, Christianity. The only alternative is to reject all the religions which are based on the Torah.
Johann Hari of the Independent wrote the following article...
"The Jewel of Medina was written by a journalist called Sherry Jones. It recounts the life of Aisha, a girl who was married off at the age of six to a 50-year-old man called Mohamed ibn Abdallah. On her wedding day, Aisha was playing on a see-saw outside her home. Inside, she was being betrothed. The first she knew of it was when she was banned from playing out in the street with the other children. When she was nine, she was taken to live with her husband, now 53. He had sex with her. When she was 14, she was accused of adultery with a man closer to her own age. Not long after, Mohamed decreed that his wives must cover their faces and bodies, even though no other women in Arabia did.
You cannot read this story today – except in the Koran and the Hadith. The man Mohamed ibn Abdallah became known to Muslims as "the Prophet Mohamed", so our ability to explore this story is stunted. The Jewel of Medina was bought by Random House and primed to be a best-seller – before a University of Texas teacher saw proofs and declared it "a national security issue". Random House had visions of a re-run of the Rushdie or the Danish cartoons affairs. Sherry Jones's publisher has pulped the book. It's gone." (Full article here)
This writer is to be praised for his bravery in addressing this subject. The philosophical tradition of the West is built on the right to question anything. Those who reject the right to independent thought reject our society. The world is a large place. There is no need for incompatible peoples to live in the same location. These people are entitled to their views; so are we.
It is a flaw in the psyche of the Western Mind to think that all people think in the same way. Racial differences manifest physically in attributes such as skin colour, body shape, athletic prowess etc. These differences do not mean that one race is superior to another, but they do clearly show difference. Differences which cannot be seen such as differences in how the world is perceived are more important than the physical differences. The only solution to this absolute incompatibility is for the separation of the nations into geographically distinct regions where everyone can express his/her innate soul free from attempts by each to impose their own ethics upon the other.
Muslims do not need to have the philosophical mentality pushed on them. Hindus are free to believe they do not exist as individuals but are like indistinguishable drops of water in the ocean. People of the West do not need politically correct commissars dictating that they must be tolerant of those who by instinct despise their open mindedness.
Racial hatred is a negative reaction to a natural perception of a need to live amongst ones own people. A positive expression is separation. Political correctness and multi culturalism are unacceptable to anyone with a healthy sense of identity. For the psychological and spiritual health of everyone, this contrived ethnic mixing must end and measures must be undertaken to prevent it ever reoccurring. Then, maybe, we will have peace.
Genuine research into the life of Mohammad is forbidden under Islam, as to do any research and think independently is to doubt the word of Allah. It is highly likely the Qur'an was written by a highly educated Rabbi in Jerusalem in an attempt to unite Judaism and Christianity. It was never intended to be a new religion. All thinking Muslims should study the origin of Islam and having discovered for themselves that 'Mohammad' was a nom de plume, should ditch Islam and embrace Christianity as the fulfillment of Torah Judaism. Likewise Torah Jews should take the logical step and separate from the Talmud Jews whose Pharisaic religion is antithetical to the only religion of the book, Christianity. The only alternative is to reject all the religions which are based on the Torah.
Johann Hari of the Independent wrote the following article...
"The Jewel of Medina was written by a journalist called Sherry Jones. It recounts the life of Aisha, a girl who was married off at the age of six to a 50-year-old man called Mohamed ibn Abdallah. On her wedding day, Aisha was playing on a see-saw outside her home. Inside, she was being betrothed. The first she knew of it was when she was banned from playing out in the street with the other children. When she was nine, she was taken to live with her husband, now 53. He had sex with her. When she was 14, she was accused of adultery with a man closer to her own age. Not long after, Mohamed decreed that his wives must cover their faces and bodies, even though no other women in Arabia did.
You cannot read this story today – except in the Koran and the Hadith. The man Mohamed ibn Abdallah became known to Muslims as "the Prophet Mohamed", so our ability to explore this story is stunted. The Jewel of Medina was bought by Random House and primed to be a best-seller – before a University of Texas teacher saw proofs and declared it "a national security issue". Random House had visions of a re-run of the Rushdie or the Danish cartoons affairs. Sherry Jones's publisher has pulped the book. It's gone." (Full article here)
This writer is to be praised for his bravery in addressing this subject. The philosophical tradition of the West is built on the right to question anything. Those who reject the right to independent thought reject our society. The world is a large place. There is no need for incompatible peoples to live in the same location. These people are entitled to their views; so are we.
It is a flaw in the psyche of the Western Mind to think that all people think in the same way. Racial differences manifest physically in attributes such as skin colour, body shape, athletic prowess etc. These differences do not mean that one race is superior to another, but they do clearly show difference. Differences which cannot be seen such as differences in how the world is perceived are more important than the physical differences. The only solution to this absolute incompatibility is for the separation of the nations into geographically distinct regions where everyone can express his/her innate soul free from attempts by each to impose their own ethics upon the other.
Muslims do not need to have the philosophical mentality pushed on them. Hindus are free to believe they do not exist as individuals but are like indistinguishable drops of water in the ocean. People of the West do not need politically correct commissars dictating that they must be tolerant of those who by instinct despise their open mindedness.
Racial hatred is a negative reaction to a natural perception of a need to live amongst ones own people. A positive expression is separation. Political correctness and multi culturalism are unacceptable to anyone with a healthy sense of identity. For the psychological and spiritual health of everyone, this contrived ethnic mixing must end and measures must be undertaken to prevent it ever reoccurring. Then, maybe, we will have peace.
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
Natural Environmental Change
Everyone knows that humans are causing global warming. The worst culprits are those white men who drive 4 by 4 cars and pump tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere. Everyone knows that.
Well, perhaps not everyone.
For years we have been told that CO2 is a dangerous Greenhouse gas, which is trapping heat in the upper atmosphere and causing Global Warming. That has been the buzz-word since the 1990s. We have been told that the Polar Ice Caps are melting, Polar Bears are drowning as a result of environmentally unfriendly individuals not recycling. Oddly, heavily polluting industries which give large sums of money to politicians tend not to be the villains of the piece. The democratically elected (then judicially rejected) President of the USA, Saint Al Gore, even made a film telling us how bad we all are. The world is getting hotter and its all our fault!
Scary as this all is, for the politicians there is a problem - summers have gradually become cooler and the Ice sheets have obstinately started to grow. To deal with this alarming development, the buzz words "Global Warming" have been gently dropped and replaced by the new mantra "Climate Change."
Ordinary individuals are, of course, still responsible for the changing environment and must be made to pay a Global Tax to sort this problem they have caused. Naturally, a Global Police Force must enforce a Global Law which will be presided over by a Global Court, with a Global Army serving to punish extreme transgressors, all of course coordinated by a Global Government - after all, it is a Global problem!
What these protectors of the planet who are oozing with compassion fail to mention is that the science they use to justify their scare mongering is seriously flawed, nay skewed. Recycling is a good thing in itself - we should treat the planet with respect, rather than chuck shameful amounts of waste into the sea, air and land. No one with an ounce of humanity would argue that it is acceptable to treat our world like a rubbish tip. However, contrary to the mass of propaganda, recycling will not significantly improve the atmosphere. It still must be done, but out of decency and respect - not due to a false fear.
What the lying politicians and phony Eco-warriors fail to mention to a gullible public is that the Sun has an effect on the Earth! Bizarre as it may sound, when the Sun emits more heat, the Earth gets hotter! Solar activity is directly linked to the climate of the Earth, and to all the planets in the neighbourhood. When solar activity increases and there are more Sun Spots, the planets get warmer - Mars (to my knowledge) is not populated by mucky oiks who chuck their unrecycled rubbish in the bin and drive 4 by 4s, yet when Earth heats up, Mars heats up accordingly.
Call me a cynic, but could it be possible that the politicians who brought us the great lies of the 'surprise attack' of Pearl Harbor, the mysterious non event of the Tonkin Bay Incident, the 6 Million temporarily gassed in gas-free showers, the Moon non-landings, the 9/11 and 7/7 Zionist/Neo-Con 'Muslim' Terrorist bombings, etc ad nauseum, could it be that they may just be telling us more porkies in order to further subjugate us to their despotism?
Well, perhaps not everyone.
For years we have been told that CO2 is a dangerous Greenhouse gas, which is trapping heat in the upper atmosphere and causing Global Warming. That has been the buzz-word since the 1990s. We have been told that the Polar Ice Caps are melting, Polar Bears are drowning as a result of environmentally unfriendly individuals not recycling. Oddly, heavily polluting industries which give large sums of money to politicians tend not to be the villains of the piece. The democratically elected (then judicially rejected) President of the USA, Saint Al Gore, even made a film telling us how bad we all are. The world is getting hotter and its all our fault!
Scary as this all is, for the politicians there is a problem - summers have gradually become cooler and the Ice sheets have obstinately started to grow. To deal with this alarming development, the buzz words "Global Warming" have been gently dropped and replaced by the new mantra "Climate Change."
Ordinary individuals are, of course, still responsible for the changing environment and must be made to pay a Global Tax to sort this problem they have caused. Naturally, a Global Police Force must enforce a Global Law which will be presided over by a Global Court, with a Global Army serving to punish extreme transgressors, all of course coordinated by a Global Government - after all, it is a Global problem!
What these protectors of the planet who are oozing with compassion fail to mention is that the science they use to justify their scare mongering is seriously flawed, nay skewed. Recycling is a good thing in itself - we should treat the planet with respect, rather than chuck shameful amounts of waste into the sea, air and land. No one with an ounce of humanity would argue that it is acceptable to treat our world like a rubbish tip. However, contrary to the mass of propaganda, recycling will not significantly improve the atmosphere. It still must be done, but out of decency and respect - not due to a false fear.
What the lying politicians and phony Eco-warriors fail to mention to a gullible public is that the Sun has an effect on the Earth! Bizarre as it may sound, when the Sun emits more heat, the Earth gets hotter! Solar activity is directly linked to the climate of the Earth, and to all the planets in the neighbourhood. When solar activity increases and there are more Sun Spots, the planets get warmer - Mars (to my knowledge) is not populated by mucky oiks who chuck their unrecycled rubbish in the bin and drive 4 by 4s, yet when Earth heats up, Mars heats up accordingly.
Call me a cynic, but could it be possible that the politicians who brought us the great lies of the 'surprise attack' of Pearl Harbor, the mysterious non event of the Tonkin Bay Incident, the 6 Million temporarily gassed in gas-free showers, the Moon non-landings, the 9/11 and 7/7 Zionist/Neo-Con 'Muslim' Terrorist bombings, etc ad nauseum, could it be that they may just be telling us more porkies in order to further subjugate us to their despotism?
Tuesday, 19 August 2008
Stay out of the Stormdrain
The internet is a great place to get information out to people who would otherwise be uninformed of matters that they need to know. For example, the wealth of information relating to the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center would have been hard to disseminate in the pre-internet age. Sadly the internet is also the home of child porn and other sickening phenomena.
On a political level, positive sites such as Final Conflict serve to get important information out to a wider audience. The flip side of the political internet lies in disinformation sites and slander sites. I speak specifically of the chat sites such as the Stormfront and VNN fora.
When Stormfront was created it was a useful tool for keeping a highly dispersed nationalist community linked. To this end it was beneficial to the movement as a whole. Similarly VNN served this function. However, over time these and similar sites have degenerated into places for internet warriors to attack one another. The energies expended in labelling erstwhile comrades as traitors is phenomenal. Notably, the sites tend to be used to attack people within the movement.
The result of all the mud-slinging is to give sites such as Searchlight & Indymedia a veritable armoury of propaganda to be used against the movement. Furthermore, the postings have an alarming tendency to contain disinformation and lies which can be used by the authorities to clamp down on the movement.
How many Police/State Security personnel post on Stormfront? Probably as many as study the site for information which will be of use in prosecuting or otherwise silencing political opponents of the State. People who believe they can post with anonimity are seriously deluded. The internet is monitored to a mind-boggling extent. Publishing anything which could be construed as inflammatory is beyond stupid; it is dangerous.
An annoying aspect of these fora is how they are used to make abusive and insulting attacks against individuals. Generally, these attacks begin as a result of an individual having a personal axe to grind, but they quickly snowball with uninformed idiots joining in the abuse, when in reality the issue has nothing to do with them. The moderators by allowing this despicable behaviour are condoning it. This is irresponsible in extremis.
I ask the moderators to be vigilant in stopping people using their sites to conduct personal slanging matches. I ask further for all who would be tempted to join in such juvenile and negative conduct to desist. If you truly care for your nation you will act in a positive manner in the real world, not in the way of a cyber village idiot.
I have not personally been abused on Stormfront. I do know people who have. This appeal for decency and sense is not for myself, but for the movement as a whole. Good activists have been hounded by such sites to the point where they have given up the struggle. This is a gift to the enemy. Until such time as the moderators of these fora take their roles seriously and stop this abuse, no one should have anything to do with their sites. I, for one, will not be visiting them.
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
Feminism degrades women
We now have a situation where a young woman can get a house and a steady liveable income if she has a child on her own. If she has a husband or lives with her boyfriend she will get nothing. As a result many women aged 16+ are choosing single motherhood as a way to get a house and all the material benefits. It is not unusual for a woman to split up with her man and sneak him into the house unofficially - however if she is caught trying to have a traditional family, she will lose all the benefits and be prosecuted - with the state taking her child/children into 'care.'
'Care' is in reality a horrendous institution where children are routinely physically, sexually and mentally abused - many go on to be abusers, criminals and junkies.
The collapse of the family has come about since the introduction of the Marxist Welfare State. It has become an epidemic since the 'sexual revolution' of the nineteen sixties wherein women were taught that they didn't need men and men were taught that women were merely for sexual gratification. The result is women are either stuck in the Welfare System or are forced to work and hand their children over to strangers in a crèche. Men have been reduced to sex-obsessed animals that abandon their children to single mums and live irresponsible, pointless, selfish, degenerate lives. The children have no role models other than footballers or fashion models (some role models!) and society is being ripped apart.
None of this would have been possible had the fake Feminist Movement not had such success in destroying the traditional family. A Man used to have a function - as Husband, Father and provider of material needs. A Woman had the function of Mother, Wife, and provider of non-material sustenance. Children were cared for and loved and set good examples of how to behave.
I do not for one moment suggest that Women are inferior to Men. They are of equal worth. Men and women and are only truly at their best when together as a strong bonded couple. Feminism has split Men from Women and from Children. The results are that Britain is a sick nation. The American Dream is to be rich. The British Dream is to escape from Britain and its diseased anti-family 'culture'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
