Toben in court

Dr Frederick Toben is in court today for the thought crime of daring to question the Jewish Masters of Europe. If he is extradited this will mean no-one in the European Union will be safe to express dissent against the Zionist tyrants in Brussels and Strasburg. Alarmingly, Dr Toben committed his 'crime' in Australia, which is about as far from the EU as one can get. This is a grave situation for all who love freedom and the right to free speech.

http://www.ihr.org/other/oct08toben.html

Toben's Arrest - New Assault Against Free Speech

Why 'Holocaust Denial' Laws Are Dangerous

By Mark Weber, Institute for Historical Review, 16th October 2008

On October 1, British police at London's Heathrow airport arrested Dr. Frederick Toben - an Australian citizen and a Holocaust revisionist - during a stop on a flight from the United States to Dubai. He was detained on the basis of a "European Arrest Warrant" issued by German authorities that accuses him of publishing material online "of an anti-semitic and/or revisionist nature."

Toben, a former schoolteacher who holds a doctorate in philosophy, has reportedly described the Holocaust as "a lie". His Australia-based "Adelaide Institute" website allegedly carries the transcript of an interview in which he says there is "no proof" that the Hitler regime systematically exterminated Jews.

He is being held in custody until a British court decides if he is to be extradited to Germany. A hearing is scheduled for 17th October. A German prosecutor says that if Toben is extradited, he could be sentenced to five years in prison. He would then join two German citizens, Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf, who are already serving prison terms for having violated Germany's "Holocaust denial" law.

In Germany it is a crime to "deny, play down or justify" genocidal acts carried out by the Hitler regime. "Holocaust denial" is also a crime in France, Switzerland, Belgium,Austria, and several other European countries, as well as in Israel. Over the years many individuals have been fined, imprisoned or forced into exile for "denying the Holocaust," including Robert Faurisson and Roger Garaudy in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Juergen Graf and Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, Guenter Deckert and Hans Schmidt in Germany.

The Toben case has generated considerable media attention and much critical commentary. One of Britain's most influential daily papers, the Telegraph, sharply condemned the arrest as a "blatant attack on free speech." In an editorial headlined "Dr. Fredrick Toben's Arrest Should Alarm Us All," it cautioned that "the British legal system should have no part in this process." Chris Huhne, a British parliamentarian and home affairs spokesman of the Liberal Democratic party, noted that "Holocaust denial" is not a crime in Britain, and said that British courts should refuse to extradite Toben.

In most of the world, Europe's "denial" laws are regarded as peculiar and unjust. This was obvious after the November 2005 arrest in Austria of British historian David Irving. He was detained on the basis of an outstanding warrant for the "crime," committed 16 years earlier, of having expressed dissident views about the wartime treatment of Europe's Jews. After a sensational trial in Vienna, he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. (He was released after 13 months.)

Irving's ordeal prompted commentary in newspapers around the world - nearly all of it critical of the arrest and of the laws in a few European countries under which he, and many others, have been imprisoned, fined or forced into exile.

"Denial" laws criminalize even factual or truthful statements that "play down" the wartime treatment of Europe's Jews, thereby violating ancient and universal standards of justice

Justice applied selectively is not justice. It is a form of injustice. Because "denial" laws prohibit dissident views about only one chapter of history, they are inherently unfair. They inhibit historical inquiry and restrict free speech.

Free and open societies normally protect even offensive speech. That's why western countries defend the right of their citizens to "deny, play down or justify" crimes committed by the United States, Israel or the Soviet Union, or to publish offensively anti-Christian or anti-Muslim writings.

Across Europe authorities routinely punish those who say or write things that the Jewish community regards as offensive, but take no action against those who offend Christian or Muslim sensibilities. Thus, in Germany and several other countries, it's a criminal offense to say that Elie Wiesel is a liar or that the Anne Frank diary is a fraud, but perfectly legal to say that Jesus or Muhammad were liars.

"Holocaust denial" laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term Jewish campaign. In 1982, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a London-based agency of the World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure governments to outlaw "Holocaust denial." The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its "Holocaust denial" statute in 1985 (amended in 1994), France in 1990, Austria in 1992, Belgium in 1995, and Slovakia in 2001. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 called for new and more severe laws against "Holocaust denial."

Because Germany is trying to impose its "denial" statute beyond its own borders, the Toben case has dangerous implications for online freedom of expression everywhere. Everyone who cares about freedom of speech - even those who are outraged by Toben's views -- should be alarmed by Germany's high-handed attempt to censor the World Wide Web.

Toben's extradition to Germany would establish a dangerous precedent. Britain and other European Union countries would be obliged to turn over to Germany anyone in any EU state, including visitors from non-EU countries, who expresses dissident views on "the Holocaust" that are accessible on the Internet.

In the Zundel and Rudolf cases, German state prosecutors claimed the right to prosecute persons for Internet "denial" postings on websites in countries where such writings are legal. In the Toben case, German authorities are asserting the right to punish even non-citizens for such violations.

German authorities claim the right to prosecute anyone anywhere for expressing dissident views on "the Holocaust" that can be accessed online in Germany, even when such expressions of opinion are entirely legal in the country where they are posted, and regardless of the language in which they are written.

As some observers have pointed out, Germany is trying to "legislate for the entire world" by treating downloadable Internet material as a German publication. Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party, said that while his party in no way condones Toben's views, "not only has he not broken any UK laws, but in seeking to arrest him, Germany is claiming censorship rights to the entire Internet network."

The danger also exists that other countries, citing the German precedent, may similarly seek to punish persons outside their borders who post writings that violate their parochial notions of permissible speech and writing.

Turkey, for example, could demand the extradition and punishment of anyone in any European state who posts online writings that violate the country's law that makes it a crime to insult the Turkish nation. Pakistan or Saudi Arabia could demand the extradition and punishment of persons in Europe who post writings or images that insult Islam. China could demand the extradition and punishment of persons who call for the independence of Tibet, or who question the legitimacy of China's Communist Party.

It is difficult to believe that Germany would allow other countries to punish its citizens on the same basis that Germany insists on punishing anyone who violates its own "thought crime" law.

Germany's effort to impose its peculiar limits on free speech outside its borders has potentially harmful consequences for Internet freedom of expression everywhere. Because the Toben case has such far-reaching implications, people in many countries will be closely watching how British authorities decide to handle Germany's extradition request.

Zgrams mailing list

Zgrams@zgrams.zundelsite.org

mail to: listZgrams@zgrams.zundelsite.org

http://lists.zgrams.zundelsite.org/mailman/listinfo/zgrams

Northern Ireland a Jewish War

The British Isles are a collection of islands which include Great Britain (England, Scotland, Cymru, Kernow), Ireland, the Isle of Wight, Mannin, Hebrides, Orkneys, Shetlands, Scilly Isles, Guernsey, Jersey, Alderney, Sark, Ynys Môn and a number of others. Regardless of whether one is Manx, Welsh, Irish etc, the inhabitants of every part of the British Isles are classed as British.

Northern Ireland is an administrative region of the United Kingdom. It comprises 6 of the 9 counties of the ancient Kingdom of Ulster. The United Kingdom was formed when the nation of Great Britain absorbed the nation of Ireland. In 1922 the Irish Free State was created when 26 of the 32 counties of Ireland gained independence from the United Kingdom. 6 counties based in the north of Ireland remained within the UK as the region of Northern Ireland. Since the creation of the Irish Free State, the 6 counties of the North have been disputed by those who regard them as British and those who see them as Irish. The Irish Free State underwent political changes, being known from 1937 to 1949 as Eire, and after 1949 as the Republic of Ireland.

Northern Ireland is known for the atrocities committed on its soil. A great deal of propaganda has been created which has hidden the origins of the conflict and who has caused it and benefited from it. The common misconception is that it is only in the lifetime of the Irish republic that there has been conflict between the British and Irish populations of Northern Ireland. As the Irish are part of the British family, the notion of an Irish-British conflict is nonsense. In truth, the conflict has its origins with Zionist lackey of William of Orange.

Another misconception of the (Northern) Irish Conflict is a religious conflict between created from animosity between Protestants and Roman Catholics. This is based on a confusion between Protestantism which began as an attempt to reform the corruption in the Roman Catholic Church and Anglicanism, which began as a political device of King Henry the VIII. King Henry was an evil man who murdered his wives when he grew tired of them. When he was unable to murder his wife Catherine of Aragon, for fear of provoking a war with Spain, he created his own church. Anglicanism is thus not a Protestant variety of Catholicism, it is a murderous anti-Christian false religion. That the terms Protestant and Anglican have become blurred is testimony to the success of the propagandists of that evil cult.

The survival of the Church of England was in no way assured. Catholics in England as well as mainland Europe attempted to restore Catholicism. The Gunpowder Plot of Guy Fawkes was such an attempt. The Anglican anti-religion would have succumbed to the will of Rome had it not been for the intervention of the Jews. Jews in Amsterdam funded William Stadholder, a common soldier, who rose meteorically to become a General in the Army. After arranging his marriage to Mary of York, he was elevated to the position of King of England. In return for their financial assistance, William of Orange allowed Jews into positions of authority over all Englishmen. The Masonic Orange Order were a part of the machinary which engineered William's success.

The Anglican Church was enshrined as the only 'church' in England, with the Monarch acting as its head - in effect as its Pope. The principle rule of the Church was the infallibility of the Crown, not God. This allowed for anti-Christian obscenities such as abortion, divorce and, of course, Man (Monarch) as God. Naturally the Church of Rome was opposed to this cult. However, it was the Anglican anti-Church which persecuted the Catholics. With the Catholics on the mainland forced to convert or die, the anti-Christ army of Oliver Cromwell turned its attention to the devoutly Catholic neighbouring Island of Ireland.

Cromwell used insane propaganda such as Catholics eating babies to rally the English into a fratricidal slaughter of their Irish brothers and sisters. Centuries later, the horrendous potato famine was a continuation of the terrorist strategy to destroy Catholicism in Ireland and replace it with anti-Christ Anglicanism. The Jew dominated government in London exported food from Ireland to ensure the Irish who couldn't emigrate would starve.

To bring the sad saga up to modern times, as the real prospect of an independent Ireland arose, to ensure division was maintained, the Orange Lodge organised persecution of Catholics in Northern Ireland. The Catholics cried out for help, which is when the British Army was sent to the province to protect the Catholics. As has been the agenda for centuries, the Masons set distinct communities against one another with the intention of causing bloodshed and disorder. The Irish Republican Brotherhood organised the Green Nationalists, whilst the Orange Order organised the Loyalists.

Thousands of ordinary people have died as a result of the Masonic war in Ireland. The Catholic Church in England was destroyed by Jewish interlopers as a foundation for the destruction of the Church in its entirety. This next step came with Vatican II and the Jewish anti-Pope Paul VI.

Like many of the ills besetting the people of the British Isles, the root cause of the Intra-British conflict lies with the Jews.

Slavery is Jewish

White people are forever being told that we are guilty of exploiting Africans. We are told that we are to blame for the famines which have plagued Africa since the European powers left. We are blamed for the slave trade. In reality, ordinary Whites were as much victims of the Slavery as were Blacks, and the root of African hunger lies squarely at the foot of Jewish supremacists.

The Slave Trade has been used to beat Europeans down and to foster resentment in Africans. However, the Transatlantic African Slave Trade was a late development of exploitation which followed centuries of exploitation of White Europeans.

The English Empire (which predates the nation of Great Britain) was built on maritime power. Likewise was the Spanish Empire. The privateers who robbed and murdered on the high seas have been portrayed as European rogues. However in truth, many of the most bloodthirsty pirates were Jews. As the Imperial nations developed, the pirate bands were formed into navies. The Royal Navy of England was nothing more than a formalised organisation of pirate criminals. Famous pirates such as Francis Drake have been focused upon as 'gentlemen of the sea'. For the innocent Englishmen who were press-ganged into serving the Crown these tyrants were nothing like gentlemen.

The gang masters were overwhelmingly Jewish. Ordinary Christian Europeans were kidnapped, beaten and forced into slavery for the Jewish rulers of England. The suffering of many was so extreme that death was a welcome release. Eventually the widespread brutality caused civil unrest on a scale which could not be ignored. This spurred the press-gangers to look elsewhere. First to suffer were the ordinary people of Ireland who were brutalised by the mass murderer Oliver Cromwell. Then came Africa.

When Jewish Slave Traders went into Africa, contrary to the myth of Europeans dragging Blacks out of their mud huts, they bought the Slaves from African Slave owners. The idea that Blacks were kidnapped, as popularised in the propaganda film Roots, is a lie. Slavery had been established in Africa for millenia and was not a European import.

Officially, the Slave Trade was abolished in the early nineteenth century. In reality it was universalised with the Jewish rulers becoming owners of the Goyim through the taxation system, and the twin evils of Finance-Capitalism and State-Socialism. Now more than ever, all non-Jews are in the pockets of the Zionist elite. Europeans have always been, and remain, victims of Jewish materialism.

The False Ideology of Egalitarianism: The Race of Adam, not the Jews, Destined to Take Dominion of the Earth

By Soldier of Jah



http://truth-against-the-world.blogspot.com/2008/10/false-ideology-of-egalitarianism-race.html

"We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the GOYIM by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated." -Protocol 9, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

"Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism (Evolution), Marxism (Communism), Nietzsche-ism (Socialism). To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the GOYIM." -Protocol 2, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

"Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws" -Protocol 1, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


The Jews indoctrinate the non-Jewish masses with the ideology that "all races are created equal." Among themselves, however, they teach that the Jews are superior to the rest of humanity, who are but like "cattle" compared to the "god-like" Jew. The truth is to be found in neither of these two doctrines.

As noted in Protocol 1 above, there is no equality between the races of humanity. Are we really to believe that the race that has produced Western Civilization -- invented 99% of all technology, contributed the vast majority to areas of art, literature, philosophy, science, jurisprudence, etc -- is equal to races of "humans" in the Third World who would (and in many cases do) live today as they did thousands of years ago, in grass and mud huts in a hunter-gatherer society were it not for the white man? Of course not. There are clear and undeniable differences in the races in the areas of intelligence, creativity, imagination, and temperament which are the result of innate genetic characteristics -- that manifest themselves in the cultural achievements and type of society the races produce.

The myth of egalitarianism is based in the false idea that all "humans" are of common ancestry. As I discussed in an earlier article, the various races are not of common origin. Adam was not the first "human", but rather the father of only the white race. There were other "humans" on the earth prior to the creation of Adam, which were the non-white races.

The race of Adam was created "in the image" of the Creator, and therefore possesses many of the qualities of the Creator -- intellect, creativity, ingenuity, empathy, capacity to forgive, etc. This race was to have a special relationship with the Creator (to be His "children") and also created for a special purpose -- to take dominion" of the earth and eventually rule the earth with Yahweh (God).

Does this mean that the race of Adam is to subjugate, ruthlessly oppress, or even exterminate the non-white races? Generally speaking, no. They are commanded to live separate from the non-white races, but in harmony with them (when possible). The exception to this rule is in regard to the races of "humans" who are biologically descended from Satan and the Fallen Angels, and are therefore eternal enemies of God and His Children. In this case, the conflict is irreconcilable, and the only solution is the destruction of one of the opposing groups.

The so-called "Jews" are a large portion of modern-day "humans" who are of such serpentine and devilish ancestry, as I discussed in this earlier article. Like their father Satan, the Jews are counterfeits and impostors. As Satan desires to take the place of Yahweh (God), Satan's children desire to take the place of Yahweh's true children. Therefore, the so-called "Jews" falsely claim to be "God's Chosen People", and seek to take away from the race of Adam their rightful destiny of authority in the earth.

In the future, the Creator will settle the score, and use His true children to completely annihilate the hellish spawn that are destroying the earth.

"And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it."--Obadiah 1:18

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." --Revelation 3:9

US embassy attack in Yemen another Mossad false flag - Authorities arrest terrorist cell connected to Israeli Intelligence

By Soldier of Jah




http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7656807.stm

Yemen seizes 'Israel-linked' cell

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence.

Mr Saleh did not say what evidence had been found to show the group's links with Israel, a regional enemy of Yemen.

The arrests were connected with an attack on the US embassy in Sanaa last month which killed at least 18 people, official sources were quoted saying.

Israel's foreign ministry has rejected the accusation as "totally ridiculous".

"A terrorist cell was arrested and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services," Mr Saleh told a gathering at al-Mukalla University in Hadramawt province.

"Details of the trial will be announced later. You will hear about what goes on in the proceedings," he added.

The 17 September attack was the second to target the US embassy since April. Militants detonated car bombs before firing rockets at the heavily fortified building.

Mr Saleh did not identify the suspects, but official sources were quoted saying it was same cell - led by a militant called Abu al-Ghaith al-Yamani - whose arrest was announced a week after the attack.

An Israeli foreign ministry spokesman said the Yemeni president's statement was without foundation.

"To believe that Israel would create Islamist cells in Yemen is really far-fetched. This is yet another victory for the proponents of conspiracy theories," Igal Palmor said in remarks reported by AFP.

BPP against racist AFA!

Kate Dermody of the British People’s Party has organised a demo against racist rap cds, to be held outside the HMV shop in Leeds city centre on the 18th October 2008. Leading up to this demo, Kate Dermody has been purchasing cds, such as Ice Cube’s Death Certificate, which she has then taken to Milgarth Police Station to protest against the racist content of the cds. The Police have told her that the cds are perfectly legal even though they call for the rape and murder of white people. When she asked whether it would be legal for a white band to cover these cds, substituting the word ‘Black’ for ‘White’ she was told it would not be. The official word from West Yorkshire Police is that it is fine for a song to call for whites to be butchered, but it is racist for a song to call for the same treatment of whites!

The politically correct storm troopers of Anti-Fascist Action, Searchlight etc have organised a counter-demo against the BPP. In effect, these alleged anti-racists are to campaign for the sale of racist cds. This exposes their claim to be anti-racist as a lie. They are anti-white.

The AFA counter-demo is about pushing their Marxist agenda, using the race issue as an excuse for violence. With the notorious criminals of Class War backing up AFA (who themselves are advocates of physical violence to censor free speech), the stage is set for street confrontation of the Direct Action variety. Indymedia have even posted a hit-list.

The BPP demonstration has been organised with the Police to fully comply with the law. Attendees from the BPP group have voluntarily agreed to register formally so as to emphasise the desire for the demo to be peaceful. Class War etc have had no such restrictions placed upon them - indeed they have vowed to attack the legal, peaceful, opponents of racist cds. It will be interesting to see how many people are rounded up by the Police, how many people are put into hospital, and most importantly who gets off unscathed and at liberty.

More will be written on this after the 18th.

Feminism from two angles.

Feminism is one of the great lies which has been used to beat Europeans into submission. By pitting men against women in an un-natural fight, the self-chosen rulers of our oppressed lands have undermined our cohesion and gained the upper hand over the indigenous peoples. Here are some interesting takes on the impact of Feminism in the USA. They could be applied to anywhere.

The following statement was made by a gentleman who goes by the name of Rabbi Swindleberg. If you’re reading this good Rebbe, get in touch!

"Fighting for equal rights and fighting to take control are two different things. The man hatred is not productive and is designed to destroy the family. That is my only point.For me to fight with women over this is exactly what the intent is. I will not indulge the wishes of the designers of feminism by doing this with you ladies.

This is not attack on women. Let’s get that straight. It is an attack on a movement that was designed to destroy the traditional family. Since you see no need for the traditional family then the movement is fine. I ask you one thing. With society being healthier by every indicator in 1950s America compared to now what did the entire counter culture movement achieve?
We can think of society as concentric circles of strong bonds. Feminists have weakened the foundational bond of the family. After that the other circles decay.
I love women and their creative loving spirit. I am in no way advocating taking anything from them.

The spirit of the feminist movement is noble but you must always be suspicious of these movements with grandiose goals such as world peace and feeding the poor. What were the motives of these women? Most of them were Jewish Marxists and as we know one of the later goals of international Marxism was to destroy the family. Turn the man against the woman, the woman against the man, the children against the parents. The state is the true authority under this system, no other hierarchy is recognized by this system. We must remember that the traditional family structure created the environment that gave us our original Constitutional Republic.

The reality is that self population control is already being practiced by those with the cognitive ability to plan ahead for families. This self control is only exhibited by the upper IQ members of the population. Although eugenics is professed to be bad in certain respects it makes more sense than the dysgenics being practiced now. We have swung the pendulum to the other extreme from eugenics to dysgenics.

I believe in Equality of the sexes but if you investigate the feminist movement closer it was designed to tear the family apart. Remember, most of these radical movements stem from the Marxist ideology of deepening natural divisions in society to break it apart. I in no way see women as objects for lust and reproduction, but productive members of society that should be cherished

http://jwa.org/feminism/ is a Jewish link that celebrates the pivotal roles that Jews played in this family destroying movement. I invite everyone to explore this site and other sources to get the kosher feel for this destructive movement."

………………………..

The following was written by a comrade from the USA who uses the non de plume ‘Not One of Them’. This lady (in every sense) was hounded by the liberal bigots to such an extent that she has ceased posting on the net. This is a real shame. Here is what she wrote about her personal experience of the anti-feminine Zionist weapon which goes by the misnomer, “Feminism”:

"I remember the movement. The effects before, during and after. It wasn't feminine-ist, women became rather 'butch', and it was not always a good thing because it was used like a truncheon. The 'handlers' consistently fed us messages we were weak, victims, powerless and we should be angry. On the other hand they pushed the 'open' relationship.Have lots of sex. Sex this, sex that...but be angry and insistent. Always angry. Always Horney. Always insistent. That's what I saw the movement 'give us'. But anger is not the best fuel on which to run a career. Or a personal life.

The press had a field day, CIA op Gloria Steinem' Ms. magazine was CIA funded. CIA op scripted Freidan. It was all a ploy to get women into the workplace so the elite could collect income taxes. We were told we were being 'used', we became 'used.'Over a number of years I saw women become reactive, overly-competitive, even with each other, combative, and some cases conniving. It was sometimes to beat a man out of a job. The equal opportunities thing was ridiculous, merit meant nothing, and gender meant everything. Not good.Just winning. Some lost their jobs because of it.

I, for one, believed some of it, but could never come up with a clear answer why I felt I was marginalized. I gave up ranting about it. I really had it made. I got great jobs, good pay I never asked for, didn't sleep with the boss, never lost a job, in fact I was approached, got better jobs and more pay without asking for it. I have friends who had the same experiences. We weren't feminists.

I get the impression a lot of the angry ‘feminists’ are strong and successful. I doubt it's because the typical feminist has been a victim or that it was a 'right' granted to her. She already had it. She is not a group.

There was a strange thing I began to notice in the late 50's, if a woman submitted an article, recipe, made comments to the media, or was on the society page and if she were married she was Mrs. so-and-so. I thought it was just a policy. It wasn't. Women liked it. It only stopped when the victim/right thing began.

Divorce skyrocketed. splitting the family.Please don't box yourself into a tight corner, a group. One can never know the flaws a group has and you are 'labelled' whether you like it or not. Keep your own identify, no one can grant rights to you, you go claim them because they are already yours - by being focused, committed, intelligent, educated (no matter what level), a great work ethic and skills in forming business relations. Just be so damn incredible they can't say no.

My male boss offered to send me to law school...I turned it down but it was great to have that happen. I hope you won’t think me a bossy old woman. I just believe in getting a job you absolutely love and settling in. You will be amazed how people will single you out. You'll be successful. Just have to have patience.

Modern Feminists assume that all women were angry about the traditional family structure. That is just as much of a sweeping generalization as saying they were all happy. My point is what freedoms were these terribly oppressed women not allowed to have? As I said, in the 1950s and 1960s women could vote go to university or raise a family the choice was theirs and constitutionally secured. You see the division going on here. Blame the evil white man for something he wasn’t even doing!

I believe if a great guy wants to take care of a woman that is a powerful statement about her."

……………

As you will have read, whether seen from a male or female perspective, the false dogma of Feminism is nothing less than a tool to destroy the family and enslave women. Its roots are kosher through and through. Do you want your nation turning into a dysgenic androgynous cess pool? Or do you want a society built on family values and morality? Feminism is a key factor in the destruction of European culture across the globe regardless of location. Europeans in California, North Carolina, Argentina, New Zealand, Scandinavia, Great Britain or wherever, are under threat from this divisive Judaic tool.

In Israel, Orthodox Jews are rebelling against this poison which has spread into the trendy liberal areas of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa etc, by attacking women who dress immodestly! The women are only responding to the Zionist Feminist propaganda that treats women as pieces of meat, worthy only of using for sex – as indeed are the feminised men. The Orthodox hit squads are reacting to a weapon of their own creation which is now impacting upon Jewesses as much as gentile women. It is in everyone’s interest that this vile dogma be exposed and dealt with.