"Crimes and Mercies" by James Bacque: the genocide of 9 to 14 million ethnic Germans under Allied occupation from 1944-1950

By Soldier of Jah

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/crimes-and-mercies-by-james-bacque.html

"Germany is the deadly enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped and retaliation towards every German, woman and child."

—Professor A. Kulisher, a Jew, calling for the genocide of all Germans to be a priority of worldwide Jewry. 1937.

A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950"
http://www.library.flawlesslogic.com/cm_rev.htm

Reviewed by Eric Blair

Canadian historian James Bacque's new book, Crimes and Mercies, is a sequel to his 1989 work Other Losses. While the latter focused on the fate of millions of German POWs at the end of the Second World War, more than a million of whom the Allies deliberately left to die of a synergistic combination of disease, exposure, and starvation, his current book focuses largely on the grim, post-war fate of 60 million German civilians.

[...]

According to Bacque, given the extraordinarly harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies (i.e., the British, French, Soviets, and Americans), at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.

German boy scavenges for foodHe writes: "This is many more Germans than died in battle, air raids and concentration camps during the war. Millions of these people slowly starved to death in front of the victors' eyes every day for years."

Adding: "These deaths have never been honestly reported by either the Allies or the German government."

[...]

But it is the U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., who is the arch-villain of the piece, the one who hatched the serpent's egg: the vicious, vengeful Morgenthau Plan for the post-war "pastoralization" (read: the de-industrialization and abject subjugation) of the German people.

Devised, "cancelled," then implemented via the punitive directive JCS/1067, the Morgenthau Plan wreaked havoc on the German economy and, by extension, the fragile European economy.

Because of it, post-war reconstruction in Germany was delayed until late 1948; by which time millions of German civilians had already perished.

Foreword to "Crimes and Mercies"
http://www.codoh.com/review/revcrimercies.html

The facts are so horrifying that they are hard to comprehend. The work I have done myself in The German Expellees and Nemesis at Potsdam revealed the horrifying statistics behind the mass expulsions of fifteen million Germans from the Eastern Provinces and the Sudetenland into the Occupied Zones in 1945-50. At least 2.1 million are known to have died. Chancellor Adenauer himself wrote in his memoirs that six million of them died. And the (West) German government under Adenauer in 1950 determined that 1.4 million prisoners of war had never returned to their homes.1 They are missing to this day. Bacque revealed what had happened to them in his book Other Losses (1989). And now he uncovers evidence that as many as five million Germans may have starved to death while under Allied government after the war. These figures are so shocking that he has sent the whole manuscript to a world famous epidemiologist, whom I met when he was working in Geneva as a special consultant to the World Health Organization. He is Dr Anthony B. Miller, Head of the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the University of Toronto. Miller has read the whole work, including the documents, and checked the statistics, which, he says, 'confirm the validity of [Bacque's] calculations and show that slightly more than five million deaths of German civilians occurred in Germany as a whole during the post-war period through to the census of 1950, over and above the reported deaths. These deaths appear to have resulted, directly or indirectly, from the semi-starvation food rations that were all that were available to the majority of the German population during this time period.'

After the fall of the communists, Bacque visited the KGB archives in Moscow where he found further evidence of the startling death figures in Other Losses. Those archives contain documents revealing some of the worst crimes of the twentieth century, committed by the Soviets. It is remarkable that such evidence was not immediately destroyed, but carefully preserved instead. As the Russian historian Dmitri Volkogonov has written in his book, Lenin: 'Lenin was not moved to halt the crime against men and women aged between fourteen and seventeen, and merely wrote "For the archives" on the document, thus establishing the tradition that no matter how callous, cruel and immoral an act of the regime might be, it would be recorded and stored in the archives for a history that would never be written as long as that regime lasted.' 2 Now Bacque has used those documents, along with others newly declassified in the Hoover Institute Archives in Stanford and the Library of Congress, to determine the fate of the majority of German civilians who were neither expellees nor prisoners of war. The most important of these papers belonged to a man I knew and admired, Robert Murphy, a sound, decent, warmhearted American who was the diplomatic representative of the US government attached to the American military government in Germany from 1945 onwards. Ambassador Murphy witnessed and deplored the vengeance inflicted on Germany under JCS 1067, the chief American directive on occupation policy pursuant to the purportedly abandoned Morgenthau Plan. In this section of the papers, which, so far as Bacque can determine, is published here for the first time, Murphy wrote in 1947 that 'owing to the present high death rate in Germany', the population would shrink by two million in the next two or three years. The evidence of that population shrinkage is clearly revealed in the two censuses of 1946 and 1950.

Rioting Students

On the 18th October the British Peoples Party held a demo against racist rap music. Antifa turned up mob handed to protest against the BPP, thus holding a counter-demo in defence of racist, sexist, homophobic, black-supremacist music! There is a a video of the event on youtube on which it can clearly be seen that the much hyped Antifa presence was mainly made up of students on a day out. The hard-core Anti-Fascists showed themselves for the violent thugs we have come to know them as. They set out to deliberately destroy public property and attempted to intimidate the opposition by means of threats of violence. This tactic of terrorising people one does not agree with has a name - it is called TERRORISM.

West Yorkshire Police did a commendable job in keeping the terrorist AFA away from the peaceful protest of the BPP. The BPP objective was to highlight the racist, sexist, supremacist and homophobic nature of some of the products being sold by HMV. This objective was met, with the added bonus of the Leeds city centre HMV shop remaining closed, thus losing money as a direct consequence of stocking such vile 'music'. The AFA objective was to 'Smash the Fash', which in English translates as silencing anyone who does not conform to the Stalinist ideology of AFA and their handlers. The AFA counter-demo and resulting riot served only to give publicity to the BPP protest. In fact, it was AFA's presence which led to HMV losing money - a result which goes in the BPP's favour. Overall, AFA failed miserably.

The BPP presence was only small, which has led to some claiming it was a failure. To tally up the result, the BPP acted legally and got their message across, HMV were exposed as mercenary peddlers of hate, losing money into the bargain, and AFA showed their true colours as violent terrorist scum, wrecking part of Leeds and alienating themselves from the ordinary people they farcically claim to represent.

Ancestors of Jews, the Canaanites, practiced child sacrifice - relation to allegations of 'blood libel', Bohemian Grove, abortion industry

By Soldier of Jah



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/ancestors-of-jews-canaanites-practiced.html

As I discussed in a previous article, modern-day so-called "Jews" are descended from a people known as the Canaanites, who lived in modern-day Palestine in ancient times. The Canaanites worshipped a pagan god called "Molech" - to whom they practiced child sacrifice. The Canaanites also practiced the eating of human flesh as part of their occult rituals. The word "cannibalism" comes from "Canaan" and the demon god "Baal", another one of the Canaanite deities.

The Jews -- according to their Satanic religion rooted in Babylonian occultism -- have continued the practice of child sacrifice down through the ages. In Middle Age Europe, there were widespread reports of Jewish ritual sacrifice of "gentile" children -- in which children were kidnapped, tortured, slaughtered, and the blood of victims is used in various rituals and/or acts of cannibalism. Martin Luther, the father of the Protestant Reformation, confirmed the accounts were true:

"They have been blood thirsty bloodhounds and murderers of all Christendom for more than fourteen hundred years in their intentions, and would undoubtedly prefer to be such with their deeds. Thus they have been accused of poisoning water and wells, of kidnapping children, of piercing them through with an awl, of hacking them in pieces, and in that way secretly cooling their wrath with the blood of Christians, for all of which they have often been condemned to death by fire." --Martin Luther, On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543

The Jews have long denied that such reports are true, dubbing the "false" allegations as "blood libel." But now even modern-day Jewish historians are admitting that the charges of "blood libel" were in many cases true. See here.

Fast forwarding to modern times, the ancient Canaanite ritual of child sacrifice is continued by the ruling Jewish elite at the well-known annual Bohemian Grove meeting, and other similar gatherings around the world. At the Bohemian Grove gathering, Jewish elites, their political puppets, and other powerful individuals (openly and admittedly) conduct a mock human sacrifice ritual called the "cremation of care" in front of a 40-foot-tall owl that represents the Canaanite deity of Molech. Although the ritual is just a caricature of a human sacrifice, there is evidence that real human sacrifices may have been conducted at Bohemian Grove in the past. And who knows what these Jewish elites do at other more secretive gatherings.



Child sacrifice rituals continue to be carried out all over the world, with reports surfacing from time-to-time of child kidnapping and pedophile rings, and "Satanic Ritual Abuse" connected to shadowy elite groups. And the prevalence of such crimes are almost certainly much more widespread than we have been lead to believe by scant reporting in the Jewish-controlled mass media. For example, thousands of children turn up missing and vanish every year -- many certainly victimized in the Jewish-dominated international child sex slave industry, snuff film industry, and used for child sacrifice.

On a final note, although unbeknownst to most people, the practice of abortion is a form of this child sacrifice ritual -- an industry, by the way, which is dominated by Jewish "doctors."

Practitioners of Satanism -- which Talmudic "Judaism" is -- believe that by conducting child sacrifice they are not only pleasing their god Satan, but they are unleashing Satanic power into the world, giving themselves the power to bring in Lucifer's kingdom on earth. And given the acceleration of the Satanic "new world order" conspiracy over the past ~45 years -- during which time some 40 to 50 million children have been murdered via abortion in the United States alone -- who is to say that this belief is unfounded?

Rumpelstilzschen

by Horst Mahler

"Rumpelstilzchen" was significant and relevant for Germany as well as the whole world. If we call the Jews by name and expose the misdeeds that they have been committing for thousands of years, they can be exposed and intercepted. Then they would be unable to continue robbing, gouging and plundering the world because no one would deal with them.

"Who would voluntarily submit to being robbed?" asked Mahler. "This is precisely the message that we get from the story of Rumpelstilzchen!"

The evil gnome Rumperstilzchen had always succeeded in keeping his name secret from the public because if his name were known, he would lose his power. Rumpelstilzchen exuberantly danced around the fire shouting "Ach wie gut daß niemand weiß, daß ich Rumpelstilzchen heiß"! (What a wonderful thing that nobody knows my name is Rumpelstiltskin!) But then along came someone who simply called out his name. Rumpelstilzchen was exposed and that was the end of him. He "exploded" in helpless rage and disappeared, never to be seen again.

Toben in court

Dr Frederick Toben is in court today for the thought crime of daring to question the Jewish Masters of Europe. If he is extradited this will mean no-one in the European Union will be safe to express dissent against the Zionist tyrants in Brussels and Strasburg. Alarmingly, Dr Toben committed his 'crime' in Australia, which is about as far from the EU as one can get. This is a grave situation for all who love freedom and the right to free speech.

http://www.ihr.org/other/oct08toben.html

Toben's Arrest - New Assault Against Free Speech

Why 'Holocaust Denial' Laws Are Dangerous

By Mark Weber, Institute for Historical Review, 16th October 2008

On October 1, British police at London's Heathrow airport arrested Dr. Frederick Toben - an Australian citizen and a Holocaust revisionist - during a stop on a flight from the United States to Dubai. He was detained on the basis of a "European Arrest Warrant" issued by German authorities that accuses him of publishing material online "of an anti-semitic and/or revisionist nature."

Toben, a former schoolteacher who holds a doctorate in philosophy, has reportedly described the Holocaust as "a lie". His Australia-based "Adelaide Institute" website allegedly carries the transcript of an interview in which he says there is "no proof" that the Hitler regime systematically exterminated Jews.

He is being held in custody until a British court decides if he is to be extradited to Germany. A hearing is scheduled for 17th October. A German prosecutor says that if Toben is extradited, he could be sentenced to five years in prison. He would then join two German citizens, Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf, who are already serving prison terms for having violated Germany's "Holocaust denial" law.

In Germany it is a crime to "deny, play down or justify" genocidal acts carried out by the Hitler regime. "Holocaust denial" is also a crime in France, Switzerland, Belgium,Austria, and several other European countries, as well as in Israel. Over the years many individuals have been fined, imprisoned or forced into exile for "denying the Holocaust," including Robert Faurisson and Roger Garaudy in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Juergen Graf and Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, Guenter Deckert and Hans Schmidt in Germany.

The Toben case has generated considerable media attention and much critical commentary. One of Britain's most influential daily papers, the Telegraph, sharply condemned the arrest as a "blatant attack on free speech." In an editorial headlined "Dr. Fredrick Toben's Arrest Should Alarm Us All," it cautioned that "the British legal system should have no part in this process." Chris Huhne, a British parliamentarian and home affairs spokesman of the Liberal Democratic party, noted that "Holocaust denial" is not a crime in Britain, and said that British courts should refuse to extradite Toben.

In most of the world, Europe's "denial" laws are regarded as peculiar and unjust. This was obvious after the November 2005 arrest in Austria of British historian David Irving. He was detained on the basis of an outstanding warrant for the "crime," committed 16 years earlier, of having expressed dissident views about the wartime treatment of Europe's Jews. After a sensational trial in Vienna, he was sentenced to three years imprisonment. (He was released after 13 months.)

Irving's ordeal prompted commentary in newspapers around the world - nearly all of it critical of the arrest and of the laws in a few European countries under which he, and many others, have been imprisoned, fined or forced into exile.

"Denial" laws criminalize even factual or truthful statements that "play down" the wartime treatment of Europe's Jews, thereby violating ancient and universal standards of justice

Justice applied selectively is not justice. It is a form of injustice. Because "denial" laws prohibit dissident views about only one chapter of history, they are inherently unfair. They inhibit historical inquiry and restrict free speech.

Free and open societies normally protect even offensive speech. That's why western countries defend the right of their citizens to "deny, play down or justify" crimes committed by the United States, Israel or the Soviet Union, or to publish offensively anti-Christian or anti-Muslim writings.

Across Europe authorities routinely punish those who say or write things that the Jewish community regards as offensive, but take no action against those who offend Christian or Muslim sensibilities. Thus, in Germany and several other countries, it's a criminal offense to say that Elie Wiesel is a liar or that the Anne Frank diary is a fraud, but perfectly legal to say that Jesus or Muhammad were liars.

"Holocaust denial" laws are the result of a well-organized, long-term Jewish campaign. In 1982, the Institute for Jewish Affairs in London, a London-based agency of the World Jewish Congress, announced that it was launching a worldwide campaign to persuade and pressure governments to outlaw "Holocaust denial." The anti-revisionist laws that were subsequently enacted in several European countries reflect the success of this initiative. Germany enacted its "Holocaust denial" statute in 1985 (amended in 1994), France in 1990, Austria in 1992, Belgium in 1995, and Slovakia in 2001. Underscoring the organized nature of this campaign, the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists in June 1998 called for new and more severe laws against "Holocaust denial."

Because Germany is trying to impose its "denial" statute beyond its own borders, the Toben case has dangerous implications for online freedom of expression everywhere. Everyone who cares about freedom of speech - even those who are outraged by Toben's views -- should be alarmed by Germany's high-handed attempt to censor the World Wide Web.

Toben's extradition to Germany would establish a dangerous precedent. Britain and other European Union countries would be obliged to turn over to Germany anyone in any EU state, including visitors from non-EU countries, who expresses dissident views on "the Holocaust" that are accessible on the Internet.

In the Zundel and Rudolf cases, German state prosecutors claimed the right to prosecute persons for Internet "denial" postings on websites in countries where such writings are legal. In the Toben case, German authorities are asserting the right to punish even non-citizens for such violations.

German authorities claim the right to prosecute anyone anywhere for expressing dissident views on "the Holocaust" that can be accessed online in Germany, even when such expressions of opinion are entirely legal in the country where they are posted, and regardless of the language in which they are written.

As some observers have pointed out, Germany is trying to "legislate for the entire world" by treating downloadable Internet material as a German publication. Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party, said that while his party in no way condones Toben's views, "not only has he not broken any UK laws, but in seeking to arrest him, Germany is claiming censorship rights to the entire Internet network."

The danger also exists that other countries, citing the German precedent, may similarly seek to punish persons outside their borders who post writings that violate their parochial notions of permissible speech and writing.

Turkey, for example, could demand the extradition and punishment of anyone in any European state who posts online writings that violate the country's law that makes it a crime to insult the Turkish nation. Pakistan or Saudi Arabia could demand the extradition and punishment of persons in Europe who post writings or images that insult Islam. China could demand the extradition and punishment of persons who call for the independence of Tibet, or who question the legitimacy of China's Communist Party.

It is difficult to believe that Germany would allow other countries to punish its citizens on the same basis that Germany insists on punishing anyone who violates its own "thought crime" law.

Germany's effort to impose its peculiar limits on free speech outside its borders has potentially harmful consequences for Internet freedom of expression everywhere. Because the Toben case has such far-reaching implications, people in many countries will be closely watching how British authorities decide to handle Germany's extradition request.

Zgrams mailing list

Zgrams@zgrams.zundelsite.org

mail to: listZgrams@zgrams.zundelsite.org

http://lists.zgrams.zundelsite.org/mailman/listinfo/zgrams

Northern Ireland a Jewish War

The British Isles are a collection of islands which include Great Britain (England, Scotland, Cymru, Kernow), Ireland, the Isle of Wight, Mannin, Hebrides, Orkneys, Shetlands, Scilly Isles, Guernsey, Jersey, Alderney, Sark, Ynys Môn and a number of others. Regardless of whether one is Manx, Welsh, Irish etc, the inhabitants of every part of the British Isles are classed as British.

Northern Ireland is an administrative region of the United Kingdom. It comprises 6 of the 9 counties of the ancient Kingdom of Ulster. The United Kingdom was formed when the nation of Great Britain absorbed the nation of Ireland. In 1922 the Irish Free State was created when 26 of the 32 counties of Ireland gained independence from the United Kingdom. 6 counties based in the north of Ireland remained within the UK as the region of Northern Ireland. Since the creation of the Irish Free State, the 6 counties of the North have been disputed by those who regard them as British and those who see them as Irish. The Irish Free State underwent political changes, being known from 1937 to 1949 as Eire, and after 1949 as the Republic of Ireland.

Northern Ireland is known for the atrocities committed on its soil. A great deal of propaganda has been created which has hidden the origins of the conflict and who has caused it and benefited from it. The common misconception is that it is only in the lifetime of the Irish republic that there has been conflict between the British and Irish populations of Northern Ireland. As the Irish are part of the British family, the notion of an Irish-British conflict is nonsense. In truth, the conflict has its origins with Zionist lackey of William of Orange.

Another misconception of the (Northern) Irish Conflict is a religious conflict between created from animosity between Protestants and Roman Catholics. This is based on a confusion between Protestantism which began as an attempt to reform the corruption in the Roman Catholic Church and Anglicanism, which began as a political device of King Henry the VIII. King Henry was an evil man who murdered his wives when he grew tired of them. When he was unable to murder his wife Catherine of Aragon, for fear of provoking a war with Spain, he created his own church. Anglicanism is thus not a Protestant variety of Catholicism, it is a murderous anti-Christian false religion. That the terms Protestant and Anglican have become blurred is testimony to the success of the propagandists of that evil cult.

The survival of the Church of England was in no way assured. Catholics in England as well as mainland Europe attempted to restore Catholicism. The Gunpowder Plot of Guy Fawkes was such an attempt. The Anglican anti-religion would have succumbed to the will of Rome had it not been for the intervention of the Jews. Jews in Amsterdam funded William Stadholder, a common soldier, who rose meteorically to become a General in the Army. After arranging his marriage to Mary of York, he was elevated to the position of King of England. In return for their financial assistance, William of Orange allowed Jews into positions of authority over all Englishmen. The Masonic Orange Order were a part of the machinary which engineered William's success.

The Anglican Church was enshrined as the only 'church' in England, with the Monarch acting as its head - in effect as its Pope. The principle rule of the Church was the infallibility of the Crown, not God. This allowed for anti-Christian obscenities such as abortion, divorce and, of course, Man (Monarch) as God. Naturally the Church of Rome was opposed to this cult. However, it was the Anglican anti-Church which persecuted the Catholics. With the Catholics on the mainland forced to convert or die, the anti-Christ army of Oliver Cromwell turned its attention to the devoutly Catholic neighbouring Island of Ireland.

Cromwell used insane propaganda such as Catholics eating babies to rally the English into a fratricidal slaughter of their Irish brothers and sisters. Centuries later, the horrendous potato famine was a continuation of the terrorist strategy to destroy Catholicism in Ireland and replace it with anti-Christ Anglicanism. The Jew dominated government in London exported food from Ireland to ensure the Irish who couldn't emigrate would starve.

To bring the sad saga up to modern times, as the real prospect of an independent Ireland arose, to ensure division was maintained, the Orange Lodge organised persecution of Catholics in Northern Ireland. The Catholics cried out for help, which is when the British Army was sent to the province to protect the Catholics. As has been the agenda for centuries, the Masons set distinct communities against one another with the intention of causing bloodshed and disorder. The Irish Republican Brotherhood organised the Green Nationalists, whilst the Orange Order organised the Loyalists.

Thousands of ordinary people have died as a result of the Masonic war in Ireland. The Catholic Church in England was destroyed by Jewish interlopers as a foundation for the destruction of the Church in its entirety. This next step came with Vatican II and the Jewish anti-Pope Paul VI.

Like many of the ills besetting the people of the British Isles, the root cause of the Intra-British conflict lies with the Jews.

Slavery is Jewish

White people are forever being told that we are guilty of exploiting Africans. We are told that we are to blame for the famines which have plagued Africa since the European powers left. We are blamed for the slave trade. In reality, ordinary Whites were as much victims of the Slavery as were Blacks, and the root of African hunger lies squarely at the foot of Jewish supremacists.

The Slave Trade has been used to beat Europeans down and to foster resentment in Africans. However, the Transatlantic African Slave Trade was a late development of exploitation which followed centuries of exploitation of White Europeans.

The English Empire (which predates the nation of Great Britain) was built on maritime power. Likewise was the Spanish Empire. The privateers who robbed and murdered on the high seas have been portrayed as European rogues. However in truth, many of the most bloodthirsty pirates were Jews. As the Imperial nations developed, the pirate bands were formed into navies. The Royal Navy of England was nothing more than a formalised organisation of pirate criminals. Famous pirates such as Francis Drake have been focused upon as 'gentlemen of the sea'. For the innocent Englishmen who were press-ganged into serving the Crown these tyrants were nothing like gentlemen.

The gang masters were overwhelmingly Jewish. Ordinary Christian Europeans were kidnapped, beaten and forced into slavery for the Jewish rulers of England. The suffering of many was so extreme that death was a welcome release. Eventually the widespread brutality caused civil unrest on a scale which could not be ignored. This spurred the press-gangers to look elsewhere. First to suffer were the ordinary people of Ireland who were brutalised by the mass murderer Oliver Cromwell. Then came Africa.

When Jewish Slave Traders went into Africa, contrary to the myth of Europeans dragging Blacks out of their mud huts, they bought the Slaves from African Slave owners. The idea that Blacks were kidnapped, as popularised in the propaganda film Roots, is a lie. Slavery had been established in Africa for millenia and was not a European import.

Officially, the Slave Trade was abolished in the early nineteenth century. In reality it was universalised with the Jewish rulers becoming owners of the Goyim through the taxation system, and the twin evils of Finance-Capitalism and State-Socialism. Now more than ever, all non-Jews are in the pockets of the Zionist elite. Europeans have always been, and remain, victims of Jewish materialism.