Non-human to give Queens Speech

The 2008 (alternative) Queens Speech in Great Britain is to be given by the PG Tips Monkey. That should make a change then.

In one version of the Queens Speech, we will have an inhuman puppet of international commerce pushing a meaningless sales pitch, designed to hoodwink the masses into buying into rootless cosmopolitan capitalism. This will be a pointless juvenile distraction to hide the real intent of those behind the speech, which is to get money from the viewers in a manner which allows the slaves to believe they are free. The puppet itself is a soul-less, God-less creature, which the financial parasites will roll out to provide a familiar face to the TV-obsessed masses, who will, like sleep-walkers, feel everything is OK - as all the while they are being pick-pocketed and manipulated.

The other version will feature the PG Tips monkey!

Zionists openly discuss NWO

Zionist mouthpiece, Gideon Rachman, editor of the Financial Times has published an editorial which openly discusses the age-old dream of a Global Zionist government. For years anyone who has dared to mention the New World Order, the Bilderberg Group, the CFR/Round Table or any other aspect of the drive towards making the majority of humanity into slaves of the financial-plutocratic elite, has been subjected to ridicule. We have been called conspiracy theorists, cranks, paranoid, anti-Semites (as if criticising the architects of the New World Order is somehow being critical of organised Jewry!), amongst other less pleasant names!

Now, those who are in the know are confirming what we have long said. There is an orchestrated plan to create a one world government and to reduce the ordinary people to serfdom, under the heel of materialistic tyrants who will make those under their control suffer. How many more wake-up calls do people need before they rebel against this drive to turn us all into slaves for their gratification and profit? Enough is enough. Everyone must stand up and refuse to cooperate with those who will destroy us if left unopposed. Not tomorrow, but now!

Read the full article here

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths

http://www.davidduke.com/general/lifting-the-blame-of-spaniards-for-native-american-deaths_6327.html#more-6327

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths

Ancestors of European Americans have long been blamed for the deaths of millions of native populations after the arrival of Columbus. It is commonly held that Americans of European descent are retroactively complicit in the widespread loss of life due to disease in the 16th century. This loss of millions of lives is viewed by many historians as deliberate. Such blaming has lead to militant Hispanic hatred of Whites in America and the rhetoric that Hispanic immigrants “have got to eliminate the gringo”, that they “have got to kill him, as well as expressed intentions to seize the American southwest, an area they call “Atzlan”.

A Mexican epidemiologist, Rodolfo Acuna-Soto, made some research discoveries that muddle claims of intentional genocide by the Spanish: Smallpox seems to have existed in America before the arrival of the Spanish colonists, and the epidemics of 1545 and 1576 “seem to be another disease altogether“. His work demonstrates how vitally important ongoing historical research is to reality and to the protection of the rights of innocent people in the 21st century, in this case, the right of European Americans to exist in America. -Staff 2

http://discovermagazine.com/2006/feb/megadeath-in-mexico

Megadeath in Mexico

Epidemics followed the Spanish arrival in the New World, but the worst killer may have been a shadowy native—a killer that could still be out there.

by Bruce Stutz

published online February 21, 2006

When Hernando Cortés and his Spanish army of fewer than a thousand men stormed into Mexico in 1519, the native population numbered about 22 million. By the end of the century, following a series of devastating epidemics, only 2 million people remained. Even compared with the casualties of the Black Death, the mortality rate was extraordinarily high. Mexican epidemiologist Rodolfo Acuña-Soto refers to it as the time of “megadeath.” The toll forever altered the culture of Mesoamerica and branded the Spanish as the worst kind of conquerors, those from foreign lands who kill with their microbes as well as their swords.

The notion that European colonialists brought sickness when they came to the New World was well established by the 16th century. Native populations in the Americas lacked immunities to common European diseases like smallpox, measles, and mumps. Within 20 years of Columbus’s arrival, smallpox had wiped out at least half the people of the West Indies and had begun to spread to the South American mainland.

In 1565 a Spanish royal judge who had investigated his country’s colony in Mexico wrote:

It is certain that from the day that D. Hernando Cortés, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land, in the seven years, more or less, that he conquered and governed it, the natives suffered many deaths, and many terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were inflicted on them, taking advantage of their persons and their lands, without order, weight nor measure; . . . the people diminished in great number, as much due to excessive taxes and mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such that now a very great and notable fraction of the people are gone. . . .

There seemed little reason to debate the nature of the plague: Even the Spanish admitted that European smallpox was the disease that devastated the conquered Aztec empire. Case closed.

Then, four centuries later, Acuña-Soto improbably decided to reopen the investigation. Some key pieces of information—details that had been sitting, ignored, in the archives—just didn’t add up. His studies of ancient documents revealed that the Aztecs were familiar with smallpox, perhaps even before Cortés arrived. They called it zahuatl. Spanish colonists wrote at the time that outbreaks of zahuatl occurred in 1520 and 1531 and, typical of smallpox, lasted about a year. As many as 8 million people died from those outbreaks. But the epidemic that appeared in 1545, followed by another in 1576, seemed to be another disease altogether. The Aztecs called those outbreaks by a separate name, cocolitzli. “For them, cocolitzli was something completely different and far more virulent,” Acuña-Soto says. “Cocolitzli brought incomparable devastation that passed readily from one region to the next and killed quickly.”

After 12 years of research, Acuña-Soto has come to agree with the Aztecs: The cocolitzli plagues of the mid-16th century probably had nothing to do with smallpox. In fact, they probably had little to do with the Spanish invasion. But they probably did have an origin that is worth knowing about in 2006.

[...]

Read the rest here.

The real sin in the Garden of Eden - Not eating an apple, but seduction into sexual sin - Cain the biological offspring of Satan

By Soldier of Jah



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/real-sin-in-garden-of-eden-not-eating.html

Note: I will be using the correct names for the Messiah and the Creator, Yahshua and Yahweh, respectively.

For the serious Christian and truth-seeker, this is not a light subject, but one of imperative and profound importance that will enable one to understand the true meaning and message of the Bible. The truth about the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden is concealed by the use of figurative language in the Genesis account. Terms such as "tree" and "fruit" are used symbolically. It was not a literal snake that spoke to Eve, and tricked her into eating an apple. Upon close examination of the Genesis account and other Biblical texts in totality, it is clear that what occurred was the seduction of Adam and Eve into sexual sin by Satan. The product of this sin was Cain, the biological son of Satan. This event has defined the rest of history...ie, the war on earth between the children of Yahweh (the descendants of Adam) and the children of Satan (the descendants of Cain).

Genesis Account - Correct Understanding of the Text

Gen 2:17 (Yahweh speaking to Adam)
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:3 "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:13: "And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." (KJV)

Throughout the Bible, the term "tree" is used to symbolically refer to men, angels, or other persons. Examples include referring to the nation of Israel as the "olive tree", and Yahshua as the "tree of life", etc. There is disagreement among scholars as to whether the "trees" in the Garden were other humans, angels, or both. The "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" may refer to the fallen angel Satan, or a race of humans under his influence, and possibly even descended from him and of a satanic bloodline. Unlike the angels of Yahweh who know only good, Satan -- once a loyal servant of Yahweh, but who later rebelled -- knows both good and evil.

The word translated as "eat" in English in Genesis 2:17 and 3:3 above is from the Hebrew word "akal", which means "eat" literally or figuratively, but can also mean to "lay." The word translated as "touch" in English in Genesis 3:3 is from the Hebrew word "naga"(Strong's Hebrew word # 5060), which can be translated as "lay the hand upon", but can also be used euphemistically to mean "to lie with a woman". Both of these terms have sexual meanings and connotations.

Satan, either by himself or using humans under his influence, "beguiled" Eve (that is, sexually seduced her). The scriptures record that Adam then partook of this "fruit" as well, which most likely means that he had sexual relations with a female of the other human races in the garden.

Following their sin, Adam and Eve suddenly became aware and ashamed of their nakedness, and made clothes out of leaves to cover themselves. Would eating an apple cause this reaction? No, but a sin of a sexual nature certainly would. Furthermore, when 'God' pronounced punishment on Adam and Eve, among the punishments was that Eve would have great sorrow in childbirth.

Cain Not Listed as a Descendant of Adam - Was "of the Wicked One"

The Bible contains many genealogies of the descendants of Adam, such as those tracing the ancestry of Yahshua the Messiah all the way back to Adam. In chapter 5 of Genesis, a listing of the descendants of Adam is given. Neither there or anywhere else in the Bible is Cain ever listed among the descendants of Adam. Why? Because Adam was not his father.

The true father of Cain is attested to in the following passage:

1 John 3:8,12: "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil...Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother." (KJV)

Here the word translated "of" in the KJV is the Greek word #1537 in Strong's Concordance. When used implying a person, it means "a son of or offspring." Other translations, including the "Worldwide English" and "New English" translations, render the passage as "Cain, who was a child of the wicked one."

Some scholars say that based on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Genesis 4:1 has been tampered with, and should read:

"And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord."

Prophecy of Conflict Between the 'Seed of the Woman' and the 'Seed of the Serpent'

Yahweh ('God') pronounced judgement on the "serpent", Satan:

Genesis 3:15: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."

"Enmity" is defined as "hostility" or "hatred." The "seed" of the woman are the pure-blooded, non-mongrelized descendants of Adam and Eve, while the "seed" of the Serpent are the hybrid offspring of Satan via Cain. The latter part of the above passage predicts the victory of the seed of the woman over the seed of the serpent...ie, that the seed of Adam and Eve (ie, Yahshua the Messiah) would destroy Satan ("bruise his head"), while Satan would cause the death of Yahshua ("bruising his heel").

Identifying The Children of Cain

The descendants of Cain multiplied and became numerous, forming many tribes and nations, including the ancient Hittites, Amalekites, Edomites, and other Canaanite tribes, whom settled in the land encompassing modern-day Palestine. At the time of Yahshua, these descendants of Cain (many of them mongrelized Israelites of the tribe of Judah) were the bulk of the population living in the land of Judea, with only a small remnant of pure-blooded Israelites in the area. They controlled the civil and religious government of Judea, while technically under military rule from Rome. The religion of these Cainites was dominated by the Pharisees, and known at that time as the "tradition of the elders." It originated from Babylonian occultism, carried back to Judea by the remnant of Israelites that returned from captivity in Babylon. It is from these people and this religion that the modern-day "Jews" and "Judaism" trace their roots.

Yahshua condemned the Pharisees and the race of people to which they belonged for what they were -- a "race of vipers" and "of their father the devil." The Cainite Pharisees and "jews" of that day hated Yahshua and conspired to kill him.

Yahshua speaking to the Pharisees:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. (John 8:44)(KJV)

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!...Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?...That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. " (Matthew 23:29,33, 35-36)(KJV)

Note that "generation" in the above verse is from the Greek word "gennema" (Strong's # 1081), meaning "offspring". And how could Yahshua say that the generation (ie, race) of the Pharisees were responsible for the murder of Abel? Because the people of the Pharisees were the descendants of Cain.

The Cainite-Kenite-Canaanite-Edomite Jews - Satan's Counterfeit "Chosen People"

The goal of Satan since his rebellion and fall has been to be like Yahweh, take His place, and be worshipped as Yahweh. Therefore, Satan seeks to imitate and counterfeit the ways of Yahweh. So as Yahweh has children on the earth to do His will, Satan sought to have his own children who would do his will. The seed of the Serpent work to thwart the will of Yahweh and work to destroy the true children of Yahweh. The sons of Satan have been the primary persecutors of Yahweh's true children down through history. As Cain killed Abel, the Cainites have shed all righteous Adamite blood down through history (Matthew 23:35), including crucifying Yahshua.

Aside from an attempt to destroy Yahweh's true children through mongrelization and corruption of their genetics and prevent the incarnation of Yahshua, the incarnation of Satan into a literal seedline was an attempt to replace the true children of Yahweh with Satan's counterfeit "chosen people" -- ie, the passing off of the Cainite Jews as Israelites. Knowing Yahweh's plan beforehand, Satan even positioned the Cainites in the promised land before both Abraham and the Israelites arrived. Yahweh responded by commanding the children of Israel to completely destroy the Cainite tribes in the land.

The Parable of the Sower

In the 13th chapter of the book of Matthew is recorded a parable Yahshua gave explaining the kingdom of Yahweh. In verse 35 He states "I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

He told the story of a man who sowed good seed in a field, but while he slept, an enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat. His servants asked him if they should go and gather the tares, but the sower said no because in doing so they might also pull up some of the wheat, and said rather let both grow until the time of harvest when both would be gathered, with the wheat stored in the barn and the tares burned.

Yahshua explained the meaning of this parable to His disciples, as recorded in Matthew 13:38-39:

"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world."

Conclusion

As the Biblical texts make abundantly clear, there are literal-physical children of Yahweh and literal-physiological-genetic children of Satan on the earth, engaged in a battle for control of the planet. The race of Adam, the white race, are a special creation, and the very children of Yahweh. Their purpose is to take dominion of the earth and bring in the kingdom of Yahweh, and defeat Satan, who was reigning on the earth prior to the creation of Adam. Satan, seeking to thwart this plan, has attempted to corrupt and destroy the race of Adam by mongrelization, first in the Garden of Eden, and continuing from that point onwards. But through Yahshua, the "son of man" (ie, descendant of Adam) and son of Yahweh, Yahweh has obtained ultimate victory over Satan for His children. The time of the "harvest" is now closing in, and Yahweh will use His children to completely destroy the children of the serpent.

Resources:

THE CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

THE TWO SEEDS OF GENESIS 3:15

WHAT WAS THE REAL SIN IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN?

------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Articles:

The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race

Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan

Oily sleight of hand

Peak Oil is emotive propaganda designed to extort money from hard-pressed motorists. The theory is part of the pseudo-science being used to sell the 'Global Warming' lie. There is no proof whatsoever that oil is running out. Indeed,there is a wealth of research which suggests that rather than oil being a finite resource, it may be a naturally renewed and therefore almost limitless fuel source. The abiotic oil theory may be controversial but the science appears to be in its favour.

Why is Peak Oil being pushed? It is being pushed for a number of reasons: firstly, it allows the oil companies to increase the price of oil as a 'scarce' commodity; secondly, it gives the globalists a cover story for their military conquest of Central Asia by creating the red-herring that the wars are about oil; thirdly it neatly dove-tails with the phoney environmental movement which argues to force people to conserve energy, global environmental taxes must be used (all to protect the planet of course); fourthly, it provides a cover story for the financial meltdown the Zionist bankers are creating - people are to focus on oil, not usury, and natural unavoidable scarcity, not the deliberate actions of the Rothschilds and their ilk, for the ever-spiralling cost of living. If its oil, its no one's fault!; fifthly, the crisis is being portrayed as so far-reaching that only a global solution will do. Welcome to the One World State which will save us from the economic crisis caused by oil dependency!

In Great Britain, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has used the Peak Oil fable as an excuse to gain political credit for his fake benevolence. He has made a much publicised statement that he will cut VAT from 17.5% to 15% for 13 months. What he has been less eager to broadcast is that he has increased tax on fuel by 2% - thus actually garnering more revenue for the Government, especially after the 13 month VAT reduction has ended. See here

For people in the UK there is a useful site on which one can find the cheapest petrol in one's area. It costs nothing to register and will save you the hassle and expense of scouring your area for cheaper fuel. The crisis is fake, but the price hikes are real. This site may only save you a few pennies, but as the economic death-grip gets harsher, every possible saving will matter. Take a look - its free! Click here

Peak Oil is all about creating a false crisis to enable the despots in Brussels, Washington and elsewhere to further centralise control and tighten the economic chains around our necks. It is a lie. The more we can expose these liars who control our lives, the more chance we have of regaining our freedom. Do your own research and using your own methods, spread it to everyone you can. Do not accept the climate tax and hiked cost of living. This battle is for the survival of ourselves, our children and generations yet unborn. If we let the masters of the lie get away with this, they will enslave our people forever.

The Flood of Noah Was Not Worldwide

By Soldier of Jah


http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/flood-of-noah-was-not-worldwide.html



Introduction

The idea of a worldwide flood at the time of Noah is a misconception arising out of inexact translations and a misinterpretation of the Biblical text. As supported by a correct translation and understanding of the Biblical text, history, archaeology, logic, and the best available scientific evidence, the flood of Noah's day was a localized flood in the area of the Tarim Basin, located north of Tibet in modern-day western China.

Genesis account - Correct translation - Hebrew word translated as "earth" should be understood as "land" or "country"

According to modern-day translations, the text in Genesis records that waters were on the face of the whole "earth" (Gen. 7:17), and that all life was to be destroyed from the face of the "earth" (Gen. 7:4). The word translated as "earth" in these passages is the Hebrew word "erets" (Strong's Hebrew word #776, check in Strong's Concordance here).

The Hebrew word "erets" can refer to the entire world or planet earth, but also can be translated to mean "country", "field", "ground", and "land" (check in Hebrew lexicon here). "Erets" is rarely used in the Bible to refer to the entire planet, and most often used to refer to a limited geographical area -- eg, it is translated "land" 1,476 times, "country" 140 times, and "ground" 96 times in the Old Testament.

For example, in Genesis 4:14 the King James translation says that Cain was driven "from the face of the earth" when punished by God. Cain was not banished to another planet, but rather from the land or country where Adam and Eve lived.

Historical Evidence - Ancient civilizations have uninterrupted history going back to and before flood

According to the Bible, the flood in Genesis occurred in approximately 2345 B.C. At this period in history, there were many great civilizations existing on the earth. Based upon written historical records and archaeological evidence, we know that several of these civilizations, including those of Egypt, China, and Sumer (Mesopotamia), have an uninterrupted history going back until and before the time of Noah's flood. Egypt, for instance, has an uninterrupted line of Kings from 2000 B.C. going back to at least 3000 B.C. These civilizations were never wiped out by any worldwide flood.

The problem of gathering and storing the entire planet's animals on the ark

Noah was commanded to take two of each species of animal onto the ark. Assuming Noah had to gather animals from all over the earth, are we really to believe that Noah travelled to South America, Australia, Antarctica, and every continent on earth to find every single species of animal, bird, and insect? Further, the ark was woefully small to accommodate for living space and food storage (for almost a year) for earth's estimated 1 million species of mammals, birds, reptiles, and insects.

Understanding that the flood was localized to the area where Noah and his countrymen lived (a region hypothetically the size of the state of Montana or Germany), then the task of taking all species within that area onto the ark becomes possible, and quite feasible.

The problem of all modern human races originating from Noah's family

According to the misinterpretation of the story, all people of the earth were destroyed except for Noah, his wife, and his three sons and their wives. Therefore, we are lead to believe that all the people on earth today are descended from these eight survivors of the flood. But how could Noah's sons and their wives possibly produce the variety in the human races today -- blacks, whites, asians, etc? This is no problem for those who also mistakenly believe that all the human races could have originated from Adam and Eve. As I discussed in a previous article, this is genetically and biologically impossible, and not supported by the Biblical text. The truth is that Adam and Eve are the ancestors of the white race only. And there were other humans on the earth prior to the creation of Adam and Eve, which is why, for instance, Cain feared other people would kill him after he was banished from the garden of Eden, and how Cain was able to find a wife, have his own descendants, and build a city after being banished from Adam & Eve and their descendants.



Location of the Flood

The Bible records that after Adam and Eve were banished from the garden of Eden, they were driven to the east. This is where the descendants of Adam, including Noah, dwelled at the time of the flood. In order to locate this area, we must first know where the garden of Eden was located. Based on ancient extra-biblical sources -- including Chinese, Indian, and Persian traditions -- and the description of Eden given in the Biblical texts, Eden was a land east of Mesopotamia notable for having four rivers flowing through it. Using this evidence, the location of the garden of Eden is most likely the area of the Pamir Plateau, located northeast of the Hindu-Cush Mountains in modern-day Eastern Turkistan. Just east of the Pamir Plateau is a vast area approximately 650 miles long by 350 miles wide rimmed by high mountains known as the Tarim Basin, located in modern day western China. On a related note, one of the ongoing "mysteries" (to many archaeologists) was the discovery in the 1990s of mummies with blonde hair of Nordic-European stock in the Tarim Basin.

Conclusion

This, along with other misunderstandings of the Biblical texts -- including the myth of an earth that is only 6,000 years old and the erroneous belief in the common ancestry of all the human races -- are areas that give support to the notion that the Biblical texts are historically inaccurate, at odds with science, and unreliable as sources -- having disastrous effect upon the faith of millions of people in 'God' and the Bible.

When translated and interpreted correctly, the Biblical texts are credible, and consistent with history, archaeology, and science.


Resources:

'NOAH'S FLOOD WAS NOT WORLD WIDE' by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

Facts & Fictions Regarding Noah's Flood

'AS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH' by Dr. Wesley A. Swift (see second half of article)

'The Flood of Noah' by Pastor Mark Downey

Charitable Bullying

Pop singer Jamelia is fronting a campaign to get British school-children to give 10 pence from their dinner money to help children in Africa and Asia. How nice is that? How could anyone possibly object to this lovely warm-hearted encouragement of over-privileged children in rich Great Britain, helping poor under-privileged children in Kenya, Cambodia and other lands? It will encourage social responsibility and international compassion. How could anyone be so mean-spirited to not want British children to do their bit for their counterparts in the developing world?

Well, at the risk of being labelled politically incorrect, I object! Jamelia is a stooge of the New World Order. I very much doubt that she is aware that she is being used, or that she has any evil intent, however she is fronting a campaign which is politically motivated and psychologically damaging to the children it targets.

School children in the West are being told that they are over-privileged. This nonsense is a communitarian ploy to instill the lie that just because they are not starving (yet), children in the West are responsible for children everywhere that are starving. The terms under and over privileged are politically correct buzzwords which like all NewSpeak words, mean whatever the political commissars see fit at any given time. The terms are designed to enforce a sense of guilt.

What is sickening is that many school-children in Great Britain live on or below the poverty line. Death through malnutrition is a fact in Britain. Poverty is gripping more people daily. The idea that Britain is a rich nation is a lie. Britain is economically bankrupt. The only rich people in the country are the bankers and financial elite who have reduced the ordinary people of the nation to the position slavery. Slavery is an accurate word. Everyone in the country must work to pay taxes to the government - taxes which the government have granted themselves to pay their Zionist banking masters. Those who do not work survive on benefits - certainly some people manage to play the system, but generally most people just eke out an existence. To use the Marxist phrase, the workers of this nation, regardless of occupation, are wage-slaves. Through taxation and over-bearing legislation, aside from the Zionist paymasters, no-one in this country is free. Telling our children they are over-privileged and must part with their dinner money is a sick and twisted lie.

If for just one moment we accept the lie that the people of Britain are rich, the idea that those who work hard and save to look after their families must pay for those who won't, is nonsense. Why should people who have money give to those who haven't? The campaign Jamelia is fronting is simply an endorsement of global scrounging. How many of us have had someone come up to them in a pub and demand a pint, using the excuse 'I haven't any money and you work!' to justify this sponging mentality? Would you buy this scrounger a beer, or tell him/her to buy his/her own? As an adult, the choice is yours. The equivalent blackmailing in the schools is different, because it is children who are being pressured by Teachers, pop-stars, charities and a whole industry of scroungers to give up their parents' money. It is officially sanctioned school-bullying and child abuse, pure and simple.

To the parents out there, I say to you, do not let your children give your money to international scroungers. The money won't benefit the poor in foreign nations anyway. Whatever money gets through will only encourage them to demand more. The money you earn is yours. You do not have to give a penny to anyone. Those who live in poverty through a failure to deal with the despots in their own countries, must rise up and deal with the parasites who rule their lands - as indeed must we. Charity only helps prop up the financial elite who oppress the people they rule over. Worse still, it encourages those who get hand-outs from Britain to come here and leach even more money from the put upon workers.

They are after your children's' dinner money! They want to take the food from the mouths of your children. They are instilling false guilt into the minds of the impressionable youth. This is child abuse. This is Politically Correct pædophilia. Defend your nation, defend your children. Say no to international charity. They will call you mean-spirited for refusing to give your money to unworthy scroungers. Let them! Take pride that you are looking after your own. Educate your children. Make them strong enough to resist the state-sanctioned bullies!

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. This begins by saying no to our enemies who would starve our children and psychologically damage them. No, Jamelia, you are not getting a penny from my family! You are the one who should feel shame for endorsing such a sick and harmful cause. If you care anything about children you will condemn this child abuse!