Bishop Williamson speaks...

Hitler at 120. Europe's or Israel's best?

Today, the 20th April 2009, marks the 120th anniversary of the birth of Adolf Hitler, leader of the NSDAP. To National Socialists this is a day of celebration. To others the day comes with other feelings.

There are those who proclaim Hitler to be the Devil himself - to have been the man who ordered the destruction of European Jewry, and planned to take over the world. This accusation must be dismissed as the ripple throughout history of crude propaganda by the establishments of the nations militarily organised against the Third Reich. The professed goal of the NSDAP was Lebensraum for the German |people, not global conquest. Likewise, the alleged holocaust is a lie of the biggest magnitude, and when looked at objectively, an insult to all the peoples of Europe who have ever since been attacked using this falsehood.

So, what then should we make of Adolf Hitler and his contributi0on to World History?

Adolf Hitler was a man who presented himself as the saviour of Germany. However, in 1945, Germany was in ruins, with millions of Germans dead, wounded, raped, destitute, and vilified throughout the world. The proudest of all the nations of Europe was subjected to the basest humiliation with the sickest crimes committed by the victor against its people. Surely we cannot blame Hitler for that, can we? Wasn’t Hitler fighting a life and death struggle to save Germany from the amassed forces of bolshevism and plutocracy? How can those of us who weren’t even born at the time of the Second World War judge the man who fought to save his nation from the Satanic forces which conquered Europe?

I would say that because we find ourselves living in a European super-state controlled by what can only be called dæmonic forces, we must examine how this came to pass, and what was Hitler’s rôle in destroying the old Europe to pave the way for the new anti-Europe in which we live.

There is great controversy over Hitler’s political and ethnic background. It has been claimed that he was an illegitimate member of the Rothschild dynasty. For those who appreciate the importance of bloodlines in the unfolding of history, this is no small matter. Ironically it is professed National Socialists, often the most vehemently anti-Judaic, who refuse to discuss this issue. If Hitler was related by blood to the most prominent of the Zionist families, then this is no insignificant detail – it is in fact a very important detail, which demands attention.

Another question that must be addressed is Hitler’s war strategy. Having defeated France in 1940, Hitler could have finished the War on the Western Front by capturing the British Expeditionary Force. The result would have been to put Britain in a position where her establishment would have been forced to negotiate a peace in order to ensure the safe return of her fighting men. Did Hitler take the golden opportunity presented by the stranding of the BEF in Belgium and France, as a means to end the war with the Germanic-Celtic nation of Great Britain? No. He allowed the BEF to retreat to the British mainland, even going so far as ordering his generals not to attempt to prevent the rescue of the stranded British Servicemen. Hitler often spoke of the necessity of grabbing hold of whatever the ‘Goddess of Fortune’ proffered, lest the opportunity never be repeated. The BEF incident showed a refusal to take advantage of the situation, and forced a multi-front war on Germany and his allies. Can this be put down to a mere misjudgement of the British establishment? Or was it a calculated tactic to ensure Total War and the destruction of Germany?

Following the debacle on the Western Front, Hitler launched Unternehmen Barbarossa against the Soviet Union. The Armies of the Third Reich achieved unimaginable victories and looked set to smash the USSR. Again, Hitler’s orders are bizarre. The European people who had suffered under the non-European, non-Christian, Soviet Kommisariat, greeted the armies led by Germany as liberators. They had suffered under the heel of Talmudic Bolshevism, and rushed to greet their European brothers from the West. Hitler ordered the German military to treat the people of Eastern Europe as sub-humans. Rather than enlisting the populations of the liberated nations to the side of Free Europe, the civilians were treated as cattle, in much the same ,manner as they had been under the Soviets. These legions of potential allies were forced into the arms of the Soviets to fight in what Stalin termed the ‘Great Patriotic War’. Again, defeat was clasped form the jaws of victory.

In 1941, the Geramn Army had reached Volgograd. General Paulus of the Sixth Army advised Hitler that supply lines were over stretched. Incredibly, rather than encircling the city (renamed Stalingrad), and driving forward to the oil-rich lands beyond, Hitler ordered that Volgograd-Stalingrad be captured at any costs. Paulus was over-ruled and the infamous Battle of Stalingrad proceeded. The Goddess of Fortune had offered the Axis armies the oil foields of the Caucasus and almost certain vicory over the Soviets. This would have completed the war on the Eastern Front. Hitler instead chose to force his soldiers into the charnel house of Stalingrad, which led to the deaths through combat, starvation, frost, and execution, of some of Europe’s finest men. This defeat was in truth the death blow for Europe, from which our continent has never recovered.

The Blitzkrieg air raids over Great Britain were a well conceived strategy to break the military capabilities of Britain. Taken alongside the highly successful U-boat blockades, it was only a matter of time before Great Britain would have been unable to feed herself or continue the war effort. Hitler ordered the air-raids to shift away from attacking military and industrial tragets, and to focus upon civilians, in terror raids like those being inflicted upon German civilians. The result of this was to galvanise British support for the War, and to allow for increased military efficiency. Was this mere misjudgement on behalf of Hitler, or was it intentional and designed to lenghten the war and further wreck all Europena natins involved?

Hitler’s treatment of the Jews is another point which has to be examined without the blinkers of ideology. The lie of the Holocaust is a huge smokecreen. Hitler’s regime had many Jews in prominent positions, and the policy regarding Organised Jewry cannot really be described as anything less than Zionist. The film ‘Schindler’s List’ portrays Herr Schindler as an exceptional nan who smuggled Jews into Palestine. He was not exceptional in any way. Jews were routinely removed from Europe to Palestine as a matter of German policy. The real result of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies was to put a stop to the process of assimilation which had been threatening the very existence of a separate Jewish people in Europe. By detaining ordinary Jews, the Hitler regime actually aided the Zionist agenda of creating a Jewish persecution complex in order to ensure the survival of the Jews as an ethnic group. When one considers that ethnically, apart from the Sephardim (who are persecuted by the dominant Ashkenazi false Jews), there really is no such thing as a Jewish Race, Hitler’s policy cannoyt be seen as anything but disasterous for all nations of the World. Without the anti-Jewish hysteria, there would have been no justification for the establishment of Eretz Yisrael. The anti-Jewish policy of the Nazi regime was 100% Ashke-Nazi.

Today marks 120 years since the birth of Adolf Hitler. His National Socialist Movement presented the world with policies to overthrow the Freemasonic network, to defeat Globalism and ensure National Freedom and Social Justice for all. With the advent of the War, the ideology of National Socialism has been so tarred by the propaganda of the victors and the self-destructive actions ordered by Hitler, that any oppostion to the Globalist agenda which attempts to utilise realistic and effective means to oppose the New World Order, is reacted to in a Pavlovian manner as being ‘evil’.

The only solution to Globalism is Nationalism. The only solution to the concentration of power and property (whether Capitalist or Communist) is the widest practicable Distribution. On Hitler’s 120th birthday, we need to face the reality that National Distributism, as a core tenet of National Socialism, is the solution to the Satanic-Imperialist-Masonic-Zionist New World Order. And we need to face up to the fact that we will forever be linked to Hitler for this.

We need to ask ourselves how we are to deal with the Hitler issue. It matters whether Hitler was manipulated into destroying Europe and building Israel; whether his mistakes were genuine and without hindsight may have been unavoidable; whether his involvement was more sinister and guided by the Rothschilds to whom he may have been related.

I know this artcle will offend Hitlerian National Socialists. It is not my intention to please anyone, rather to find real ways to halt and to unravel the fast solidifying Global Super-state. Hitlerite, Strasserite, Nazi, Anti-Nazi? What difference will it make when the One World Government is completed and all freedoms abolished? All comments are welcome. So fans of Hitler and opponents alike, what do you think?

Open Letter from 2008, comments from now

I originally wrote the following article on the 11th July 2008 for inclusion in the BPP magazine, 'Vanguard'. The article was not published at the time, and to my understanding had been discarded. However, over the weekend I was informed that the article is now in circulation - published in order to cause mischief, and published against my wishes. I am reproducing the article in order to answer questions which have been posted in various fora. I have written my comments in bold after each section

Open letter to the National Front (11.7.8)

I write this with a degree of sadness. I strongly believe in Nationalist Unity and have up to this point refrained from commenting adversely on any organisation that belongs to the Nationalist family. However, I feel that I can no longer remain silent with regards to the National Front. I have remained silent in spite of the National Front proscribing the British People’s Party. This proscription was an act of spite, coming from the jealousy of the National Front for the British People’s Party being stronger numerically and ideologically. This pettiness is indicative of a profound malaise at the heart of the National Front.

....I do not believe in the proscribing of any legal organisation. Certainly, taking steps to ensure that members do not fraternise with terrorists (IRA, UVF) and Police honey traps (C18), is vital. No serious organisation can tolerate those who advocate violence. The BPP wholeheartedly opposed terrorism. If it had been any other away, I would not have given the BPP my support.

The National Front is an organisation with an impressive history. In the 1970s it was a serious force in British politics. Had the Conservative Party not cynically stolen the NF’s policies, life in this country may well have been much better than it is today. The developments in the 1980s that led to Third Positionism becoming an important aspect of Nationalist thought also deserve much praise. Unfortunately these advances tend to be forgotten due to the personality clashes and schisms that resulted. They remain praiseworthy nonetheless.

The National Front of today is not even a shadow of its former self. It has neither the physical impact of the original Front nor the spiritual and moral ideological presence of the Political Soldier stage of the NF. Both stages of the NF were impressive, the latter even more so than the former for the continuing influence of the radical ideas the NF infused into the greater Nationalist movement.

Such have been the splits and regroupings that aside from the name, the current NF has virtually nothing in common with the great party whose name the modern pretenders have usurped. It is a shame that the name ‘National Front’ has not been given a decent burial so it may be remembered with respect as the inspiration to generations of Nationalists. By continuing to use the NF name, the current grouping is tarring that memory. The Beatles are remembered as a band which had a significant impact on popular culture (for good or ill is a matter of debate!) Their strength is in part due to knowing when to quit on a high, the Rolling Stones lamentably stumbled on and lost their way. Such is the situation with the NF today.

....Whilst I still stand by my point that the NF name should have been dropped in order to preserve it as an inspiration, we find ourselves in a situation where nostalgia is a luxury we cannot afford. The NF continues, and it offers an organisational platform for driving the opposition to Globalism which is destroying every nation of the world. We need organised groups to fight the New World Order. The NF is one such group. We could get involved in romantic reminiscing for the movement that was, but it would do none of us any good. The group exists, and as such provides a vehicle for exposing the despotism of Westminster and Bruxelles. History is important, but the present is where we must fight if we are to have any chance of securing a viable future for our people.

On Thursday, 10th July, the group that calls itself the National Front stood in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. They never stood a chance in this Conservative stronghold. The result they achieved is an embarrassment. The National Front came 4th, behind the Conservatives who won with 71.6% of the vote (17,113 votes), the Greens (7.4%, 1,758 votes) and the English Democrats (7.2%, 1,174 votes).

The National Front achieved a pathetic 2.3% of the vote – a mere 544 votes, losing their deposit. They only managed to get 23 more votes than Gemma Garrett (Miss Great Britain Party). The fact that the English Democrats trounced the NF shows just how out of touch with the electorate these pseudo-political dinosaurs are. If the NF had not stood, the English Democrats would have come in second and denied the internationalist Greens second place. The NF standing was a disaster all round.

It is a shame that Tess Culnane allowed herself to be involved in this farce. Tess is a lady for whom there is great esteem in the nationalist community. She did not need to stand in the election to prove her worth and decency – she has already done that.

....Not long after the ill-conceived election campaign, Tess Culnane left the NF due to the refusal of the old leadership to face up to the realities of political life in the Police State which is twentyfirst century Britain. It is to the shame of the immovable dinosaurs who misled the NF into the July 2008 election, that they treated Tess in such a deplorable manner. The rank and file, and Tess Culnane, are to be applauded for the effort they put into the campaign. However, the leadership should not have been so short sighted as to have pushed this petty political ploy.

The tactic of standing against David Davis in order to gain publicity was pure publicity seeking opportunism. It was wholly unprincipled. The National Front had no chance of even saving their deposit in the Haltemprice and Howden by-election. By standing they sent out a message that they oppose an honourable politician (now how often does one of those appear?) in his campaign to stop the Government grabbing the obscenely draconian power to hold suspects for 42 days without charge.

The Stalinist policy of the Brown regime is a threat to everyone - Do the National Front believe they are immune to this evil? History shows that Nationalists will suffer as much as, if not more than everyone else. David Davis stood for the sole purpose of raising awareness of the dictatorial nature of the government’s policy of detaining anyone they wish to, without trial and without reason, for 42 hours.

Tess Culnane stated that she wished to broaden the debate to cover the reasons for the current terrorist attacks, covering issues such as immigration and the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Occupied Palestine etc. These are important factors, which need addressing. However, the Haltemprice and Howden by-election was not an appropriate arena for this. The 42-hour detention issue is so important that no distraction should be indulged in. Tess is a lady with convictions. Sadly the National Front leadership have taken advantage of Tess. They have proven themselves to be inappropriately opportunistic. Our complaint is not against Tess or the decent hardworking members of the National Front (and other individuals) who campaigned for her, far from it, these people acted honourably. Our objection is with the leadership of the National Front who chose to indulge in petty politics to the detriment of us all.

....I absolutely 100% stand by this statement. Fighting an unwinnable election at great expense, against a candidate who was at least discussing the tyranny of the State (albeit as a lackey of the same establishment he feigned to oppose), was in my opinion a huge error in judgement.

The NF is run by amateurs who seem incapable of formulating a coherent political strategy. The lack of direction has been apparent for some time, but this year this has palpably worsened. We have witnessed marches of around twenty people, which have served only to show the weakness of the Front and have been easy target for the opposition. We have seen failure to expel a member for proven pædophilia. We have seen tolerance of members who espouse terrorism. We have seen participation in an election that has sent out a message of support for the Brown regime and resulted in the vote received being an embarrassment. This is not all - I could go on.

....Again, I stand resolutely behind this statement. Marches of tiny bands of activists only serve to display weakness. Failing to expel pædophile scum Martyn Gilleard was an affront to decency. For this, the leadership of the time should hang their heads in shame. Ordinary members are not to blame for this lack of action by the higher echelons. It is to be hoped that the shame brought on the party will be remembered should the old leadership call on the support of the rank and file who they dishonoured with this failure to uphold the good name of the party.

This letter is an appeal to the ordinary members of the National Front who do not indulge in fantasies of armed struggle – to the vast majority. Anyone who lives under the illusion that terrorism can achieve anything other than to give the State an excuse to take away even more of our freedoms is not welcome in our ranks. This is an appeal to the decent Nationalists in the National Front, including those in the leadership who can see beyond the idea of being a big fish in a tiny murky puddle, to see that the time has come to accept that the National Front has had its day. The time has come to consign the National Front to history, to remember it with fondness and to move on.

....As I’ve written above, we are now in such a dire situation, with the imminent imposition of the European Constitution through the bogus Lisbon Treaty, that we have to fight with very legal weapon at our disposal. It matters not one jot if the NF name is dropped, and in the time lost, the slim chance of defeating the completion of the Soviet European Union, is lost. If we do not stop the shift from the current EU to the Fabian wet dream of the Communitarian Superstate, then all hope is lost. It is as simple as that.

The National Front is a Royalist Party. The Monarchy of this country is directly responsible for the unprecedented betrayal of the indigenous population and associated kinfolk. Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. This blasphemy comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. This tyrant is the man who planted the Protestant Scots in Ulster. These Scots became the Loyalists who the NF supports in the ongoing sectarian warfare. We do not support the IRA – we do not support anyone who encourages intra-ethnic warfare, however we do appreciate that the Loyalists are the descendants of people who were not originally native to Ulster. This ethnic difference, with its most noticeable expression in terms of religious variation does not merit conflict – from either faction. Both Orange and Green Nationalists need to see the bigger picture. The outcome of sectarian warfare is the ultimate demise of all, to the benefit of people who have no kinship whatsoever with the folk of the British Isles.

The internationalist agenda of the burgeoning New World Order has been pushed relentlessly by the British Monarchy. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Boer families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth. The wholesale slaughter of civilians continued with the destruction of Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen rewarded Rudi Giuliani for his part in the murderous attacks on the New York World Trade Centre. The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda which the Royals not only support, but revel in. The NF supports these imperialist criminals. The BPP feel that there is no justification for the British people giving their loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of the nation they purport to serve.

....Again, I stand by this statement. The Monarchy are the smiling face of our financial, social and cultural enemy. The NF must drop all support for these monsters. I hope that by working with the NF, I can expose the Royal Family for the murderers, rapists, and all round Satanic usurious vermin that they are. This may offend some people, but those who tug their forelocks and sing ‘God Save the Queen’ need to be woken up to see the reality that those they misguidedly genuflect to, are the vilest, sickest family on the planet.

All decent members of the NF, from top to bottom, who genuinely believe in putting the interests of our Nation and People before all other matters, are welcome to come to the BPP. Ours is a movement of principles.

Our movement does not indulge in petty politics but sees the bigger picture. We will not contest elections as a reaction to the political wind. We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share!

....I would question the principles of the BPP and the commitment to not indulge in petty politics: What else would one call mischievously publishing an article I wrote 9 months ago? Perhaps where I wrote ‘We will certainly not oppose those whose ideals we share’, I should have written ‘I’ in place of ‘We’.

We will not put our people in danger by going on marches in inadequate numbers. We do not say that we will never have marches – we may, when our numbers are sufficient to send out a message that we are strong. That time will come.

....This commitment was abandoned when the BPP held a demo against racist rap music. Whilst I applaud the initiative, the fact is that BPP personnel were put at risk. On a positive note, the hypocrisy of AFA/ACF & ANaL/SWP was exposed, with their much-vaunted anti-racism shown to be a complete sham.

We will never tolerate pædophiles in our ranks. Our movement is a family in which comradeship matters. We have a support network unrivalled in the broader Nationalist movement.

We fight for all our people, not just for a particular religious faction. We reject the sectarianism of the National Front. It is ludicrous for people of European stock to be killing one another over matters such as whether divorce is or isn’t allowed, whilst all the time we are losing our territory to outsiders. This if even less tolerable when one considers that the sectarian factions (Sinn Fein, Orange Order etc) embrace the very multiculturalism that is destroying our lands.

....The anti-Sectarian stance of the BPP has been eroded since this article was written, with badges being sold in support of Loyalist paramilitaries. I personally oppose all terrorists operating in or from the North of Ireland. They are all, trained, funded and often staffed by British Military Intelligence (MI5). Doubtless there will be some members of the NF who support these agents of British tyranny, and they will need to be educated to awareness of how they are being hoodwinked into supporting their enemies, else kicked out for the agents provocateur and idiots they must otherwise be. However, in the light of BPP leaders selling terrorist fund-raising material, this naïvety pales into near insignificance.

The NF is imperialist, sectarian, royalist and rooted in the dark history of a past we need to overcome. People who support this agenda have no part in the Nationalist movement. The NF has no part in the Nationalist movement.

....So long as the NF aids in the fight against the Global prison, then it is a useful part of the struggle. Its Imperialist, Royalist, Sectarian past is a major problem, which must be dealt with. Right now, however, it is urgent that all opponents of the New World Order march against this peril. I would go so far as to say that we should be encouraging the rank and file of groups such as UKIP and the BNP in fighting the EU totalitarian superstate.

The time has come to join a movement rooted in the present, which looks to the future. The past is gone forever – remember it but don’t try to recreate it. Join the movement, which can and will, make a real difference!

....If I was writing this article now, I would say that the time has come to get involved with any and all movements which oppose the rapid move to a Global Superstate. It is certainly not the time for poaching members to boost membership lists. Parties must now be seen as regiments in the battle against the common enemy, and not as part of the Westminster circus. To that end, we must be steering each and every organisation we can in this battle for national and cultural life and death. If you think that winning seats in Parliament will make any difference, then you may as well join one of the Parties who are already in Parliament and feed from the rotting carcass of your nation, alongside the willing servants of the establishment.

Scientists find traces of highly explosive "nano-thermite" material in 9/11 dust

Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say

By Elaine Jarvik
Deseret News
Published: Monday, April 6, 2009

Tiny red and gray chips found in the dust from the collapse of the World Trade Center contain highly explosive materials — proof, according to a former BYU professor, that 9/11 is still a sinister mystery.

Physicist Steven E. Jones, who retired from Brigham Young University in 2006 after the school recoiled from the controversy surrounding his 9/11 theories, is one of nine authors on a paper published last week in the online, peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal. Also listed as authors are BYU physics professor Jeffrey Farrer and a professor of nanochemistry at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.

For several years, Jones has theorized that pre-positioned explosives, not fires from jet fuel, caused the rapid, symmetrical collapse of the two World Trade Center buildings, plus the collapse of a third building, WTC-7.

The newest research, according to the journal authors, shows that dust from the collapsing towers contained a "nano-thermite" material that is highly explosive. Although the article draws no conclusions about the source and purpose of the explosives, Jones has previously supported a theory that the collapse of the WTC towers was part of a government conspiracy to ignore warnings about the 9/11 terrorists so that the attack would propel America to wage war against Afghanistan and Iraq.

The next step, Jones said in a phone interview on Monday, is for someone to investigate "who made the stuff and why it was there."

A layer of dust lay over parts of Manhattan immediately following the collapse of the towers, and it was samples of this dust that Jones and fellow researchers requested in a 2006 paper, hoping to determine "the whole truth of the events of that day." They eventually tested four samples they received from New Yorkers.

One sample was from a man who had swept up a handful of dust on the Brooklyn Bridge, where he was walking when the second tower fell. As the journal authors note, "It was, therefore, definitely not contaminated by the steel-cutting or clean-up operations at Ground Zero, which began later. Furthermore, it is not mixed with dust from WTC-7, which fell hours later."

Another man collected dust in his apartment, about five blocks from the World Trade Center, on the morning of Sept. 12. There was a layer about an inch thick on a stack of folded laundry near an open window.

Red/gray chips, averaging in size between .2 and 3 mm, were found in all four dust samples. The chips were then analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and other high-tech tools.

The red layer of the chips, according to the researchers, contains a "highly energetic" form of thermite. While normal thermite (a mixture of finely granulated aluminum and an oxide of metal) can be incendiary, "super thermite" is explosive. He says there is no benign explanation for the thermite in the WTC dust.

Jones made headlines in 2005 when he argued that the rapid and symmetrical fall of the World Trade Center looked like the result of pre-positioned explosives. He argued that fires alone wouldn't have been hot enough to crumble the buildings; and that even if struck by planes, the towers should have been strong enough to support the weight of the tops as they crumbled — unless they were leveled by explosives.

Essentially forced to retire, Jones says he is now paying for research out of his own pocket. He likens himself to Galileo and Newton, who stood by their consciences. "I would like to think I could stand up for the truth," he says.

The dust study vindicates his earlier theories, Jones says, but he has mixed feelings about the implications. "As a young student said to me a while back: 'It's exciting from a scientific point of view, because things are now making sense. But I feel sad for my country."

Environmentalism as Religion

Environmentalism is an emotive issue - and naturally so. We all have to live on this planet and it is important that we take care of it. We need to protect the animals and vegetation. Also we must be more careful in ensuring we do not turn the planet into a giant rubbish heap. To that end, being environmentally conscientious is a good and laudable thing.

However, the 'Environmentalism' being preached by the likes of Al Gore, is not about caring for the planet. Sustainability is a propaganda technique to brainwash us into falling for the lie of man-made climate change. The climate is changing - it always has done so, regardless of human activity. What is the cause then? In a nutshell, the temperature of the Earth is regulated by the Sun. Increased Solar activity results in increased Earth temperature. For that matter, the other planets are influenced in the same manner. Mars, Uranus, Saturn and the rest are also experiencing 'Global Warming', but I don't think we can blame 4 by 4 drivers for that!

Why then the constant propaganda saying that ordinary people are killing the planet? Why the silencing of Science which exposes the Man-made Global Warming fraud? Why? To justify a Global tax, administered by a Global Government, enforced by a Global Police and Army. What better way to ensure compliance with the new Global Superstate than to create a new Religion for the masses to blindly follow?

Religion has long been a means of manipulating the people into serving their rulers. Fear of the big daddy in the sky watching everyone and damning all transgressors (of Priestly/State laws) to eternal suffering amid fire and brimstone, no longer works. Fear of unprovable environmental destruction is the new bogeyman to beat the masses into obedience. It is the new 'Faith' for the New World Order.

..Thanks to 'la bella senorina' for questioning this new dogma, and being a heretic swimming against the sea of political correctness - you know who you are!

G-20: The aftermath.

Yesterday saw the G-20 Circus arrive in London. The Summit was really just a pantomime event; with real policy having been settled well in advance. The ludicrous official story the media would have us believe, is that elected officials from the G-20 nations met to thrash out economic policy to deal with the global economic crisis, and reached a consensus all could agree on in just a single day. There were no clashes with regards to differences in National interests and no quibbling over monetary input. That really is an insult to our intelligence.

Personality Trivia

The media focussed on how every woman in Great Britain wants to look like the US President’s wife, Michelle Obama. I haven’t met anyone who was asked, or knows anyone who was asked, what they think of Obama’s dress sense! Frankly, with the ever-spiralling cost of living, no one cares. But according to the media, the entire nation is obsessed with this non-issue.

What other vital information did the British media impart to the people? Well, we were told that Jamie Oliver catered from the Vile Irrelevant Parasites (VIPs), that Michelle Obama (the media’s darling) hugged the Queen and that US President Obama prostrated himself before the Queen in a manner which all thinking Americans would find horrific, and all thinking Britons would find embarrassing (servile arse-licking impresses no one in Britain).

Here are just two of Obama’s nauseating grovelling statements:

“I think in the imagination of people throughout America, I think what the Queen stands for and her decency and her civility, what she represents, that's very important… There’s one last thing that I should mention that I love about Great Britain, and that is the Queen.”

The Queen stands for all that is wrong with Britain. To taody to this monster is absolutety disgraceful – and this from the President of a nation which fought for independence from the tyrannical Monarchy, is just unbelievable.

With all the attention focussed by the media on the new Washington DC puppet, one would be forgiven for thinking Obama was the ruler of Great Britain rather than a foreign Head of State. The way the Westminster regime sucked up to the US President was even more sickening than the way Tony Blair made himself a poodle of George Bush.

Orchestrated Violence

Away from the fawning over politicians and their entourage, the media took great delight in putting the spotlight on the poor hard done by Police who had to bravely defend private property from hordes of rioting scum.

The media focussed on the Anarchist Black Bloc, or as those who haven’t been poisoned by the propaganda machine call them, undercover Police / special Army units. But, to play along with the media færy tale, the Police did a stalwart job preventing massive destruction by marauding hooligans. They had to detain a few innocent people, but all in all they were magnificent!

The truth is somewhat different. The Black Bloc were allowed by their uniformed colleagues to do some superficial damage to a Royal Bank of Scotland building, at the precise moment a team of journalists had assembled there. How very fortunate indeed! The TV broadcasts showed masked Anarchists attacking a symbol of Capitalism. This obviously contrived event was reminiscent of the Battle of Orgreave in South Yorkshire in 1984.

Same agenda, Same tactics

For those who are unaware of the Battle of Orgreave, it marked a low point for the British media. In a nutshell, British miners were fighting for the existence of their industry, against the Thatcher regime, which was hell, bent of crippling all British Industry so the nation could never again be self-sufficient, but would be enmeshed in the Globalist web of interdependence. The Establishment-serving media demonised the Miners as Communist troublemakers. In fact they were ordinary British Workers fighting for a living. Certainly there were Communist elements in the Unions, but they hardly represented the Workers themselves.

At Orgreave, the Police herded the Miners into a field and then led charge after charge on horseback into the corralled Miners. After inflicting very many and serious casualties on the Miners, they finally began defending themselves by throwing whatever could be found at the Police lines. The media then changed the order of the images so it appeared as if the Police had charged the Miners in response to being stoned by them. This outrageous media manipulation was aired on the BBC1, BBC2 and ITV News programmes (there were only three channels in Britain at the time).

The result? The masses of the British people became hostile to the demonised Miners, and supported the State crackdown. With the most powerful union in Britain smashed, the Government went on to destroy the entire manufacturing and production base of the nation and made Great Britain dependent on imports. This betrayal of sovereignty and destruction of Self-sufficiency was greatly eased by the media complicity is this heinous crime

The Battle of Orgreave


Casualties of G-20

The greatest casualty of G-20 is National Freedom. The Summit was used to push through a whole raft of Globalisation. Arch Globalists including Nicholas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, Gordon Brown and Barack Obama vied with each other for who could commit the most treason against the people they purport to represent.

"This is the day that the world came together to fight back against the global recession, not with words but with a plan for global recovery and reform and with a clear timetable," stated Brown, "I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international cooperation,"

As hailed in the Manchester Guardian, under the agreement, the G20 countries proposed:

• New reforms of the global banking system, including institutions such as hedge funds, and other parts of the so-called "shadow banking system" coming under global regulatory control for the first time

• Tighter regulation for credit rating agencies, to prevent conflicts of interest
• A list of tax havens to be published immediately, and sanctions to be deployed against countries that do not comply with anti-secrecy regulations

• Completion of the creation of international colleges of supervisors for national regulators

• An agreement to do whatever is necessary to promote growth in individual countries, allowing for the possibility of the further use of fiscal stimuli in the future

• The injection of an additional $1tn into the global economy through measures including a $500bn increase in the funding available to the IMF, an increase in the availability of money for developing countries through the IMF's "special drawing rights" to $250bn and a total of $250bn being set aside for trade assistance

• Reform of institutions such as the IMF to allow countries like China to have greater influence. Senior posts at the IMF and the World Bank will open to candidates from the developing world.

• Renewed commitment to the millennium development goals.

• $50bn for the world's poorest countries.

This is pure Globalism. This seemingly innocuos rhetoric translates as the centralisation of all the world’s financial institutions, the criminalisation of economic freedom, the abolition of National Sovereignty insofar as it will be illegal to resist the global financial apparatus, the elevation of the World Bank and IMF to positions of being the only authority to determine economic policy anywhere, and the completion of the Communist-Communitarian Global takeover via the specific inclusion of the Peoples Republic of China as an arbiter of power.

This Summit also acted as a smokescreen for the first phase of the introduction of internal passports within Great Britain. The massive publicity the Summit was given was used to quietly bury the requirement of people travelling between the British Mainland and any of the many islands, to carry ID and register their details with officials. Never in history has travel with the nation been regulated. The justification? The bogeyman of ‘terrorism’.

Another victim was the Ian Tomlinson who died on the street, surrounded by uniformed Police. It is possible that he died of natural circumstances. Of course the British Police would never murder anyone would they? Ask the relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes that. Or for that matter the relatives of the thousands murdered by the State in Northern Ireland by the ‘IRA’ (MI5)

G-20 was a very bad day for freedom. A very bad day indeed.

Warning: G-20 violence will be used to usher in the Police State

Tomorrow, the 2nd April 2009 will see representatives of the financial controllers of the world meet in London for the G-20 Summit. These representatives of Global Usury hide behind the façade of democracy, but the proof of how ‘democratic’ they are can be seen in the security measures they have put in place to keep the enraged public at bay.

The British Police, who are portrayed to the world as unarmed Bobbies, have over the years been transformed into the Brutish Police. Tomorrow will see them at their paramilitary worst. Rather than the fabled lovable Coppers who help little old ladies to cross the road, they will be more like the stuff of nightmares. The stereotypical image, which used to be the reality of British Policing, is sadly now pure fantasy. The Police now more closely resemble a mercenary army, enforcing tyrannical order not protecting the people they claim to serve.

According to the Times of London,

“SCOTLAND YARD is to deploy officers armed with 50,000-volt Taser stun guns to deal with violent demonstrators planning to disrupt this week’s G20 summit in London.

The centrepiece of the security plan will be hundreds of officers from the Metropolitan police territorial support group, who are routinely armed with speedcuffs, extended batons and CS gas spray…they will be supported by officers equipped with Tasers…“There will be an armed response vehicle element to this operation and [those officers] will be carrying Tasers,” said a spokeswoman…All police leave has been cancelled and 10,500 officers, including reinforcements from other forces, will be deployed in the biggest policing operation undertaken in London.“

For those unfamiliar with the Territorial Support Group, this branch of the Police was used in the 1980s to physically beat the Coal Miners, in order to destroy the Unions and the Coal mining industry in Great Britain. This was part of the Globalist agenda to destroy British self-sufficiency in manufacturing and production, thus making the country reliant on imports. Internationalism cannot tolerate Nationhood and Self-Sufficiency.

The G-20 Summit is just a stage in the process to a One World Government. The fact that so much Police manpower is being called in, alongside the vast private apparatus which is being employed, highlights that the Internationalist agenda is not yet complete. Protesters are also mobilising to campaign against the plutocratic depots of the G-20. That is a good thing isn’t it? Well, sadly, looking at the organisations massing in London, the answer is no.

According to the Times, Protest Groups include:

“London Anarchists: (who) have appealed for people to join in “direct action” similar to that seen at previous anti-globalisation protests

Whitechapel Anarchists: London group which praised the attack on the home of Sir Fred Goodwin, the disgraced bank boss

Class War: veteran anarchists who are encouraging supporters to “burn a banker”

G20 Meltdown: A new organisation which will host a carnival at the Bank of England

Climate Camp: environmentalists behind direct action at Heathrow airport and power stations in North Yorkshire and Kent

Climate Rush: group against airport expansion who have “rushed” parliament

People and Planet: student network campaigning to end world poverty, defend human rights and protect the environment

Stop the War Coalition and CND: anti-war protesters against Iraq and Afghanistan wars “

This collection of Environmentalists and Anarchists is actually a faux opposition. The Environmentalist Movement has been hijacked by Internationalists who are actually campaigning FOR a Global Tax to deal with Climate Change. They are pushing the lying propaganda of Al Gore and other Internationalist gangsters. Doubtelss many of them are sincere, but they are sincerely wrong!

The Anarchists in London are just there to cause mayhem. Most, if not all of the ‘leaders’ (sic) of these Anarchist Groups will be MI5 operatives. Class War in particular, are a group who, although they call themselves Anarchists, are really Anarcho-Communists, or to be more precise, well-to-do students playing at rebellion until such time as their Daddies gets them jobs in the City as Bankers and Solicitors. They are sad, pathetic rich kids who like to play at street heroes but don't have a clue that the real enemy is controlling them. I doubt whether any of these Class Warriors has realised that the State want destruction and death on the streets of the capital in order to justify harsh repression, classify protest as terrorism, and complete the Police State. But, of course, to these people, that doesn't matter because they can then slip back into the establishment workplace and officially join the oppressors they feign to oppose.

The strategy of creating an opposition against visible instruments of power has been used the world over. Tomorrow, the only people who will gain from the chaos caused by the controlled opposition, will be the State and the International elite. Anyone tempted to go to London must be aware of the trap being laid. Tomorrow has been orchestrated to create an excuse to usher in the Police Sate our rulers have long dreamt of. If we fall for this trick, it will be a guaranteed victory of Internationalism over Freedom. If you are going, be very, very, careful indeed.

Interesting articles:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/30/cctv-london-government-transport-g20

http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2009/310309G20_plot.htm