Is Quoting the Talmud Anti-Semitic? by Roy Tov

By Roy Tov


Should one be defined as anti-Semitic for quoting from Talmud texts that preach for committing or justifying crimes? Texts that define the Talmud supporters – at least as collaborators, or even instigators to commit, a crime?

This question is a serious one, since the modern State of Israel forces on its citizens the religious views of the Pharisees descendants, namely the rabbis. The rabbis act according to the Talmud teachings. In such a way, Israel is accepting the Talmud and its teachings. What does that mean?

Who were the Pharisees?

In 539 BC the Persians conquered Babylon, where many Jews were exiled. He let them return to Jerusalem, where the Sadducees – the priests – became the de facto authority of them. While the priests controlled the Temple, the scribes monopolized the study of the Torah, which was read publicly on market-days.

However, after the fell of the Kingdom of Judah and the exile to Babylon – where the people could witness a more developed society – the prestige of the Sadducees was in decline. The scribes took advantage of that and began the process of organizing themselves into a political party that claimed to possess the correct interpretation of the Bible, what they called the Oral Law. They based the claim on their erudition – they were among the few that could read – and on the failure of the priests to restore the splendor of the former kingdom. “Something is wrong with their interpretation,” whispered the Pharisees to the people.

Much later they became the religious leaders of the people and in a brilliant marketing event they changed their title to “rabbi” (“my master,” or literally “my much”).

What is the Talmud?

The Old Testament was considered dangerous by the Pharisees. Simply, many of the Mosaic Laws were uncomfortable – and inconvenient – to fulfil. Moreover, the prophecies regarding Jesus – their archenemy – in the Bible were difficult to ignore.

Facing such a problem, these industrious men operated a two stages plan. First, an Oral Law was created. These were laws that defined how the Mosaic Laws in the Pentateuch should be interpreted. Using them, they could turn around any law to their convenience. They claim the Oral Law was given verbally by Moses to their ancestors. The Bible does not support this claim.

At certain stage – before Jesus was born – the compilation of this Oral Law into books began. The result was the creation of a new layer of books – collectively known as the Talmud – that included all the formal interpretations of the Pentateuch – the Bible’s first five books. All the other books in the Bible were considered little more than fables by the Pharisees.

Nowadays, the rabbis – the Pharisees spiritual descendants – consider the Talmud as the main book of law. Since then, the Pharisees and rabbis can manipulate the law interpretations to their personal benefit.

Jesus and the Talmud

In the times of Jesus the Talmud was still incomplete, but its foundations already managed the Pharisees behaviour. The manipulation of the Mosaic Law for the Pharisees personal profit – the main task of the Talmud – is time and again denounced by Jesus. The strongest text on the issue is the whole of Chapter 23 in the Gospel of Matthew.

But not only there. He also said:

Matt. 15:6-9 ... Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.
15:7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,
15:8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
15:9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

And:

John 8:44: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.

Soncino

The Talmud – written in Hebrew and Aramaic – was largely ignored by the world until the Jews' College translation was published through Soncino Press between 1935 and 1948. This was the first complete English translation, produced by authoritative Jewish scholars in the world and is considered a reliable text. It is important to keep that in mind while judging the next sections.

Elizabeth Dilling

Once this task was accomplished, the way was open for an international examination of the text. Elizabeth Dilling published the first critique of the Talmud, a book called The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today. She used the Soncino Talmud, and quotes also the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia and other publications. Her analysis is considered serious.

My readers can download here her book and here the bulky exhibits accompanying it.

Before continuing with the answer of the Jewish community to Dilling’s publication, I would like to bring some of the commentaries appearing in her book.

Racism

Moses taught again and again that the stranger is to be treated the same as the Israelites:

Lev 19:34 But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
19:35 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure.

Deut 10:19 Love ye therefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Numbers 9:14 …ye shall have one ordinance, both for the stranger, and for him that was born in the land.

Yet, the oral law, or the Traditions of the Pharisees, as recorded in the Talmud, reverses Moses teachings. In Baba Mezia 108b it says: "Only ye are designated as 'men.'" The Baba Mezia passage is about the graves of Gentiles which rank like the graves of animals. "The graves of Gentiles do not defile," is the edict.

No wonder Christ said:

Matt 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

Mark 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

Non-Jews Have No Property Rights

The Talmud teaches in Baba Bathra, Folio 54b, that non-Jews have no property rights. Their possessions are "like unclaimed land in the desert." The passage appears on page 222 of the Soncino edition: "Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: The property of a heathen is on the same footing as desert land; whoever first occupies it acquires ownership."

Doesn’t the occupation of Palestine appear now in a new light?

Bestiality

The Talmud is obsessed with pornographic issues, touching some of them here is unavoidable. Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud inverted that and teaches that "unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest," since then "you will find no woman eligible …" (See Exhibit 157, from the Yebamoth, Folios 59a-59b)

Then, the ruling of the rabbis is: "A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest — even a High Priest,” and “the result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such as intercourse either." (See Exhibit 158)

Babies

The Talmud enlightens us that baby boys may be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men (See Exhibit 54). The Pharisaic excuse is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy do not apply. Throughout the Talmud "nine years and one day" is the age of male maturity.

According to the Talmud, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of intercourse" of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless. Shammai – who contributed vast texts to the Talmud, lowers the age to eight years in some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b).

Not less shocking is the following text: "When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this — that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." (See Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b).


This is the Talmudic doctrine on babies. Sodomy and intercourse with them is the prerogative of the Talmudic man. What a contrast to Christ's teachings!

However, that’s not all. "A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition …" See Exhibit 55 (Sanhedrin 55b), Exhibit 81 (Sanhedrin 69a-69b), and others.

Baby girls of three can invoke sadistic punishments on those who have intercourse with them when they are "Niddahs" (menstruating), a physical impossibility (Sanhedrin 55b - Exhibit 55; Sanhedrin 69a - Exhibit 81).

This type of crimes – and all their imaginable variations – appear time and again. What type of men wrote these texts? What type of men are their followers?

Every single rabbi in the world studied this text in order to graduate. Would you hire one as a babysitter?

Quoting the Talmud Heresies in Public is Dangerous

In 1944, Dilling's views involved her in was called “mass sedition trial.” The case was ultimately dismissed by a Federal Court as "a travesty on justice."

I am afraid to comment on that, I am already a refugee and do not need to add reasons for my persecution. Instead, I’ll bring Dilling’s own words that appear on a later edition of her book:

“The hub of world Jewish anti-Christ power, the financial and industrial power best described in Rev. 18:11-, is the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE with its B'nai B'rith brotherhood, and its "secret police", smear and ruin arm, the Anti-Defamation League. After having pushed a reluctant USA into World War II--to spread Communism across the earth, and with its first world base, Soviet Russia, as our "ally", it was decided to crush all ANTI-COMMUNISTS by trying them as "Fascists, Nazis". A series of indictments against some 30 anti-Communists, of which I was one, was engineered by the American Jewish Committee, in 1942, 1943, 1944. The 1942 indictment never came to trial. The 1943 indictment was dismissed in Washington by Judge Adkins. Only the 1944 indictment went to trial under a stooge judge Eicher. An unbelievable farce was staged without any legality or fact. After the death of judge Eicher, the case was dismissed by Judge Bolitha Laws with the scathing denunciation that it had been a crime to hold those people on trial all that time without a single piece of evidence in accordance with the charge being introduced by the prosecution against ANY defendant. The Communist press had been gloating that the "sedition trial" was part of the "Moscow Purge trials" then in session all over Europe. I reproduced the item on one of my Bulletins, sent to every Congressman.”

I want to ask again:

Is Quoting the Talmud Anti-Semitic?

Source: http://roytov.com/refugee/talmud.htm

Eustace Mullins on the Myth of the "Holocaust of Six Million Jews"; A Cover for the Real Holocaust of Germans

By Soldier of Jah

Some twenty years after World War II, the Jews began to fear that scholars might focus on the terrible massacres of women and children during that war by armies directed by the Jews. The incineration of thousands of families by mass fire-bombings of the cities of Cologne, Hamburg, Berlin, Dresden and other European cultural centers; the firestorms which killed many thousands of families in Tokyo; as well as the nuclear holocausts unleashed on civilian populations at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the last days of the Japanese War, when the Imperial Staff was already suing for peace (the Jews did not want to lose this opportunity to test their new Jewish Hell-Bomb on human targets); these and their numerous other war crimes, began to concern the Jews.

Their guilt was inescapable; it seemed a mere matter of time until their crimes would call down retribution on their heads. To forestall this possibility, the Jews began a furious campaign of their own; a highly synchronized and coordinated worldwide campaign publicizing their new myth, the "Holocaust", in which six million Jews were said to have been burned.

Six million Jews were also said to have been gassed. Whether this meant there were actually twelve million Jews "killed" no one seems to know. That holocausts, or mass murders by fire, occurred during World War II was a matter of historical record.

There existed photographs of stacks of burned corpses, which had been made in Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden after the mass fire-bombing of those cities by Allied aircraft. The problem the Jews faced was that there had been no holocausts of Jewish victims during World War II, nor were there any photographs of burned Jewish bodies.

Not to worry ~ the Jews simply appropriated the photographs of the bodies of their German victims, which are exhibited today in gruesome "museums" in Germany as exhibits of dead Jews. It was a matter of record that the Jews had actually done quite well during World War II.

In Germany, incredible sagas of bribery and corruption on the home front had secured the mass evacuation of all Jews from German cities just before the fire bombings began. When entire German families perished amid scenes of unspeakable horror, the Jews were safely ensconced in comfortable quarters in such refugee camps as Auschwitz.

The ultimate testimony as to their rescue by being segregated in these remote camps, far from the danger of the mass bombing raids, comes from ~ who else ~ the Jews themselves. As they never cease to assure us ~ they "survived".

Although they survived amid scenes of genocide or massacres of non-Jews in many countries, they realized several decades later that it was necessary for their purposes to claim that they had been "exterminated".

The protection camps in which they had been safely segregated by the Germans during World War II now became "death camps". Not only were they death camps, but they were camps such as Auschwitz, memorialized in the Atlantic Monthly, Sept. 1981, as having "its own soccer stadium, its own library, its own photo lab, and its own symphony orchestra."

The same article proudly boasts that "the hospital at Auschwitz grew to considerable size, with about twenty doctors and more than three hundred nurses." This was a "death camp?" The fact was that there was not a single German military field hospital near any combat front as sizeable or as well-equipped as the hospital at the "death camp" of Auschwitz, yet Auschwitz is always cited by the Jews as the place were millions of Jews were "put to death".

The purpose of the large modern hospital has never been satisfactorily explained, since the Jews now claim that within hours after arriving at Auschwitz, the Jews were hurried to the "gas chambers". This claim might have more validity had it not been for one unfortunate oversight by the Jews ~ they did not build the gas chambers at Auschwitz until after World War II had ended.

Almost forty years after the war, in which "six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis", as they claim, there are annual festivals, conventions, and other mass gatherings of many thousands of the "survivors of the death camps". Even more peculiar, hardly any of these prosperous, healthy and well fed "victims" claims to have been the survivor of only one "death camp".

Nearly all of them claim to have been a prisoner in five or six of the camps, this at a time when Germany, fighting a two front war, could not keep its troops supplied in the combat areas. The Jews ask us to believe that every few months they were transferred from one camp, put on a train and carried hundreds of miles to another "death camp" to be killed, and then a few months later, apparently not having been killed, they were entrained to yet another "death camp", where they remained without being harmed until the end of the war.

The reason for the otherwise inexplicable claims of the Jewish "Survivors" that they were in many different "death camps" is revealed by a simple explanation, "gelt". The "survivors" regularly receive monthly payments from the conquered Germans.

"Garfinckel" receives a monthly payment in Israel from Germany because he was a prisoner in Auschwitz.

"Rosenfeld" receives a monthly payment from Germany in Israel because he was a prisoner in Treblinka.

"Steinberg" receives a regular monthly payment in Israel from Germany because he was a prisoner in Dachau.

Garfinckel, Steinberg, and Rosenfeld ~ you don't know them? He's the same fat, grinning Jew you saw in the news coverage of the Holocaust convention.

"BEWARE OF THE FABLES OF THE JEWS". Titus 1:14. The Myth of the Holocaust or the "vanished six million Jews" is not solely a matter of collecting revenue from defeated enemies. It is also one of the most powerful weapons of propaganda in the hands of the Jews in their drive for total world power.

Today, all officials seeking to continue in office or to seek higher office in the United States must not only make a ritual pledge of eternal and unquestioning faith in the Myth of the Holocaust. To question the Myth of the Holocaust means a challenge to the Jewish world dictatorship, and it must be punished at once by the most severe sentence. Thus the most fantastic elaborations on the basic lie of the "Six million" appear regularly on American religious programs, in educational books, and in the press.

Among the rare public figures who have dared to question the Myth of the Holocaust are such individualists as the actor Robert Mitchum, who told an Esquire interviewer, in response to a question about "the six million", "So the Jews say." "So the Jews say?" shrieked the horrified interviewer. "Yeah," growled Mitchum, "so the Jews say."

Another actor, Ronald Reagan, while seeking public office, told a Jewish audience in California that "It might help your cause if you would limit your claims of victims to numbers that you could actually prove." A reporter noted that "the audience began to hiss like geese, in a rapidly rising cacophony while the aspiring politician dashed to the wings, never to reappear in the particular auditorium."

Whatever Reagan's doubts about "the six million", he has since kept them to himself. The Reagan Administration will be remembered for the ultimate enshrinement of "the final solution". Two government buildings on the Washington Mall have now been given by "our government" to the Jews for a "Holocaust Memorial".

The Washington Mall, like the Roman Forum, is the center of American aspirations for our Republic, and runs from the White House to the Capital with its principal adornment the magnificent Washington Monument. To the consternation of most Americans, the Washington Monument can now be called "Jew Alley".

Many native Washingtonians have begun to express criticism of this amazing development. In the Washington Post, April 25, 1983, William Raspberry writes on the editorial page, "I simply don't understand it." He points out that although this is to be an official American monument; neither the perpetrators nor the victims were Americans.

He quotes a Howard University professor as wondering why there shouldn't be a Slavery Memorial on the Mall to honor the memory of the slaves, or a Wounded Knee Memorial for the Indians. What he doesn't say is that the erection of a Jewish Memorial on the Washington Mall is a boast of absolute power, that the Jews have achieved absolute power over their goyim slaves in America.

We can understand that there is a huge memorial to Karl Marx erected in Red Square in Moscow. Are we incapable of understanding why a memorial to the Jews is erected on the Washington Mall?

Raspberry, who is black, goes on to tweak the big noses of his Jewish employers, the Meyer family who own the Washington Post, by saying that "a pledge that nothing of this sort will ever be permitted to happen again" worries him, because it is happening right now.

He doesn't mention the obvious example, the Rosh Hashanah Massacre of Arab women and children in Lebanon, but of course Raspberry fails to understand two crucial factors; first, that "it" never happened at all, and second, that the Jews are attempting to place the rest of the world on notice that "the Chosen People" are sacred, and that no one must ever harm a hair on their heads.

It's quite all right to massacre all the goyim or non Jewish cattle, in Cambodia, Vietnam, Africa, or Lebanon; this has nothing to do with the "sacred" presence of the Jew.

"Never Again?" the well-publicized slogan of the Jews which refers to the Myth of the Holocaust, should more properly be "Never", meaning that not only did it never happen but that it is all right for the Jews to massacre the gentile cattle whenever it suits their purposes, because the Myth of the Holocaust gives carte blanche to the Jews to kill as many gentiles as possible, "The diminution, the killing out of the Goyim," as old Anselm so lustfully put it, because it is obvious that the more gentiles that are killed, the fewer remain alive as a possible threat to the Jews.

The Myth of the Holocaust is interpreted by the Jews as giving them permission to maintain international murder squads whose assassins routinely carry out executions in every country of the world, not only against "enemies of Israel", but also against those who are merely suspected of being "potential enemies of Israel".

[...]

source

Happy Birthday Eddy!

Born in July 1949, having first come into existence at the time of the formation of Israel, Eddy has never strayed from his origins, and remains just as attached to the Holyland as he was 60 years and nine months ago!

For anyone who doesn't know Eddy Morrison, he quite rightly is known as one of the key figures in the Nationalist movement in the British Isles. Although briefly discussed on Wikipedia, Eddy's political career has been far more than just membership of various organisations. Over the course of his five decades in active patriotic politics, Eddy has been involved with pretty much every Nationalist organisation in Great Britain. His involvement has always been as a strong figure fighting the corruption which has set in across the spectrum.

By moving between organisations, Eddy has built a network of friends and comrades which sits above party divisions. In each part of the movement he has striven, as anyone who cares for his children must surely do, to implant a sense of commitment to the 14 words, as the absolute essence of the revival of European culture. Opponents have labelled this as racist, but it is nothing of the sort. The 14 words demand a future for all peoples but as strong ethnically homogeneous entities living in their own areas and developing in their own ways at their own pace. In contrast, it is the populists who embrace aspects of multi-culturalism and internationalism who are the true racists - for the policies they advocate cannot but lead to the destruction of identity of Europeans, Asians, Africans etc into a bland tasteless soup of mediocrity and materialism, fit only to be producers and consumers in the Global Soul-less Mammonist serfdom being built as the New World Order.

In addition to being a political radical, and an uncompromising defender of free nations and peoples everywhere, Eddy is also a keen Chess player - although he is a bit of a swine for using the suggestive techniques of a magician to aid his battles! That said, once one is aware of Eddy's propensity to look horrified at 'mistakes' he makes, and to not fall for these ruses, then engaging in Chess becomes a real pleasure - and victory even sweeter!

Eddy Morrison is a man of many talents. Not only is he a political activist of some renown (from street actions to web design), an artful magician and a Chess player of almost Russian ability, Eddy is also an artist. Whether it is playing the piano, harmonica or a range of other instruments, or his insightful, uplifting and saddening poetry, Eddy's artistic nature highlights the spiritual side of a man who ironically is a professed atheist. Eddy is far removed from a God-less materialist, no matter how much he refutes the existence of the Divine essence.

For those who have not had the pleasure of knowing Eddy, you can get an insight into the man by reading his memoirs, which you can find at http://www.aryanunity.com/memoirs.html and by reading his poetry at http://poemsbyeddy.blogspot.com/, or even taking a look at his taste in films at http://eddysfilms.blogspot.com. He plans to write of his experience in building the Punk Front in the 1970s as a forerunner to his friend, the late Ian Stuart Donaldson's, Rock Against Communism / White Noise. Yes, Eddy has also been known to warble the odd punk anthem!

Although today is not the actual day, it is close enough for me to wish you a Very Happy Birthday Eddy. I hope the following decades are as interesting, challenging, and rewarding as the ones you have completed.

Swine Flu has arrived! Big Deal!

England is in the grip of a Swine Flu epidemic. People are dropping like flies. The foul stench of rotting carcasses piling up in the streets is overpowering. Such is the horror now that society has broken down and the dead outnumber the living. How could things have been allowed to reach this point? Why oh why, oh, hang on, erm, well, actually - they haven't!

Swine Flu in England has been recorded as the cause of ONE fatality in an otherwise healthy individual. The death of one person is a tragedy for that person's loved ones. However, when one considers the death rate of people every day due to legally available substances such as tobacco and alcohol, or to industrial pollution (not to mention the deliberate spraying of the skies with toxic weather modifying substances), the hysteria over Swine Flu is massively disproportionate to the threat posed.

"But", I hear the TV-faithful bark in Pavlovian manner, "we've seen the statistics! How can you dismiss the Swine Flu pandemic when so many people are being diagnosed with it?"

My answer to this question is to point to the astounding fact that the diagnosis of Swine Flu is anything but medically accurate. In the overwhelming majority of cases, people who telephone their Doctors' Surgery complaining of nausea and 'flu-like symptoms' are being told that they have Swine Flu ad must isolate themselves.

The Official list of Swine Flu symptoms are:

Fever, Cough, Shortness of breath
Headache
Sore Throat
Tiredness
Aching Muscles
Chills
Sneezing
Runny Nose
Loss of Appetite

Anyone who has these symptoms is advised to ring NHS Direct on 0845 4647. they are advised NOT to go to see their GPs as this would risk spreading the infection. What this amounts to is advice to contact a call centre by telephone, where an NHS employee will listen to the patient describe his/her symptoms, then without any medical examination, and without any contact with a Doctor, the aforementioned patient will be told he or she has swine flu and must self-isolate in order to contain the spread.

So, in England, which is a country notorious for the prevalence of hypochondriacs and workshy dossers who will use any excuse to miss work, the National Health Service is providing the perfect excuse to enjoy a week off work on full pay, and to boost the numbers classified as having Swine Flu, justifying the official propaganda that there is an epidemic in the country!

The establishment need only to rely on the laziness (love of skiving) of the British worker and the hypochondria of the British non-working parasite to see the number of people who are officially recorded as having Swine Flu skyrocket!

With a vast number of people classed as having Swine Flu, the much needed rationale to mass vaccinate in order to protect the population at large (especially the children) is provided.

There is no epidemic. Certainly many people are sick with head colds, gastric problems, lethargy and general aches and pains, but by and large they are not suffering from Flu of any variety. What we are witnessing is a lumping together of general sickness under the umbrella label of Swine Flu. This is much the same as the rapid expansion of aliments categorised as indicating an individual has AIDS, as occurred when that was the media and establishment obsession.

The manufacturers of Tamiflu stand to make a massive profit from this contrived pandemic. Sadly, the vaccine itself IS dangerous and is very harmful to the health of those who accept it, under the barrage of propaganda the Media, Health Service and other branches of the establishment is subjecting them to. The irony is that natural contraction of Flu boosts the immune system, whereas vaccination at best will provide protection against the exact strain injected, for twelve months, after which, the body is more vulnerable to all strains of Flu.

Another aspect of this scandalous drive for mass vaccination is that the technology now exists to implant via the syringe, minute RFID chips. The implications for freedom and well-being of this is staggering. That is a subject which requires in depth study in itself and is beyond the scope of this post.

Don't accept the vaccination. It won't benefit you in any medical way, and is potentially very harmful. The only people who benefit are the shareholders in Big Pharma, and the politicians and other corrupt individuals in their pay.

Orange Odour fouling the Belfast air

Last night, ordinary Irish folk again took to the streets to oppose an unwelcome presence which is stifling freedom in the North of Ireland. This time however, it was not the symptom of globalism which was attacked, as in the campaigns against the presence of Gypsies a month ago. No, last nights demonstrations were aimed directly at the cause of our ills - the diabolical Illuminati front men in the Orange Order.

The Orange Odour are amongst the sickest of all the Freemasonic Lodges. They are linked to the crown and celebrate the arch enemy of the British isles, William stadholder (alias king Billy, William of Orange, Billy Rothschild). Stadholder was a member of the Stuart dynasty, who by deception came to represent the opposition to the Stuarts. This was not his only deception. He claimed to be an upholder of Christianity, yet by selling his support of the Judaeo-Christian heresy was in fact an enemy of Christianity. he was not a Protestant in that he favoured a reform of the corrupted Church of Rome, rather he was an Anglican - a member of the cult known as the C of E (Church of England/Cult of Edom). Whereas Protestantism sought to heal the Church, Anglicanism sought to replace it with an anti-family, anti-marriage, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual neo-Judaic heresy. The Orange Order are defenders of this anti-human materialistic satanic dogma.

Stadholder was of the Illuminati bloodline which has wrought so much damage to the freedom loving peoples of the world. Following in the footsteps of the insane butcher Oliver Cromwell (and family), Stadholder took money from the Ashkenazi bankers in return for granting them privileged status in the nations under his rule. Until the time of Cromwell, the usury of the Ashkenazim had been outlawed and all of the British Isles had been Christian lands. Using the lie that the Ashkenazim were Jews, and that as such they were the Chosen People of the Bible, Cromwell rescinded prohibitions against the bankers and laid the path for the despiritualisation of great Britain, England in particular. Stadholder took this a step further and enshrined the Talmudic heresy as a central plank of the Church of England and the State.

In Ireland, the Cromwells had undertaken actions which cannot be described as anything but terrorism. Their brainwashed soldiers fueled with a diabolical hatred of their brothers and sisters who refused to worship the God of the Anglican Cult, raped and murdered their way across Ireland. From this evil campaign can be traced all the inter-British conflicts.

William Stadholder was a usurper to the crown. His armies fought those of his cousin King James II, who wished to end the tyranny of the C of E and return the British Isles to the Catholic Family. The common folk on each side were tricked into believing that the end of Anglican rule and a return to sanity was a real possibility. In the infamous Battle of the Boyne (1st July 1690 /12th July Gregorian), the Crown was passed from James II to William III. The 'Battle' was a sham. The Sabatens who hid (and still hide) behind the banking industry could not tolerate a revived British Catholicism. Catholicism is irreconcilably opposed to usury and the Talmudic banking system. The gangsters who took over the British Establishment were unwilling to relinquish control. Although the Battle of the Boyne was a sham, the murders of Catholic Irish-Britons which followed were very real.

The 12th of July is the date when the Orange Order celebrate the defeat of Catholicism in Great Britain and Ireland. They are celebrating the enshrinement of the religion of the Khazars over the indigenous population. By falsely believing that the Khazars are the Jews of the Old Testament, the followers of the Orange Order are deluded into supporting their mortal enemies and fighting their brothers and sisters. The Ashkenazim converted en masse to Talmudic Judaism. Claiming the Ashkenazim are Jews makes as much sense as claiming the Muslims in China are Arabs simply because they have the same religion as the people from which Islam sprang. The Ashkenazi claim to Jewishness is even more ridiculous than the comparison of Chinese Muslims with Arabs - as the real Jews know that the Torah specifically proscribes the establishment of Eretz Israel by any human means, and the Ashkenazi Zionists break that edict with every move they make.

The Orange Order March each year is a show of strength by the Ashkenazim and their willing puppets. It is a celebration of the defeat of a European Nation by an Asiatic power. It is a celebration of the desecration of a way of life which believes in family and home above materialism. It is a celebration of the triumph of evil over good.

The Orangemen slithered from their temples and marched through the streets of Belfast to flaunt the fact that they are the power in the province, and the orchestrators of all the violence there. Their lap dogs in Sinn Fein voiced their support - showing the false divisions in Stormont for the pantomime they are. Enraged common folk put a stop to the scum marching by taking physical action against these inhuman monsters. As usual their puppet police took the brunt of the attacks. Those who call themselves loyalists nedd to know that the Crown to which they pledge allegience is the real enemy. All the terrorist atrocities in the North of Ireland, whether IRA/INLA, UDA/UVF or whatever label is used - all of them since the time of Cromwell, through the despicable William of Orange, up to present times, have been carried out at the instruction of the Ashkenazi rulers of the British Isles (the Monarchy and their Parliament). The Loyalists are by and large decent people who have been hoodwinked into supporting their greatest foes the Orange order fight for Israel, for the British Crown, for the Global Slave State, and against everything that all true Britons and Irishmen instinctively feel.

Last night saw the Orange Order receive a long over due smack in the teeth from the people they have persecuted and manipulated for centuries. with the Lisbon treaty due for ratification this year, it is to be hoped the Irish across the partition act in the manner of their brothers in the North and reject the Freemasonic tyrants by saying No to the European Constitution.

Former commanding general of U.S. Army Intelligence: 'Official' story on 9/11 is a fraud; WTC demolished with explosives; Plane did not hit Pentagon

By Soldier of Jah


Apparently, this or a similar interview with Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine appeared in the 2006 documentary "One Nation Under Siege." Despite that, this is the first I've heard or seen of this.

7th July Murders - The Culprits Gloat

Today, 7/7/9, marks the 4th anniversary of the murder in London of 52 ordinary men, women and children by the Ashkenazi establishment, which falsely labels itself British.

The murders were blamed on Muslims living in Britain, and were used as a reason for the introduction of a range of measures that purport to lessen the threat of terrorism. The only way to lessen the threat is to remove the terrorists from positions of authority in the City of London, and in their playhouse of Westminster.

Note that today is the fourth anniversary. It is customary for events to be commemorated when they reach the 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th and 100th anniversaries. It is therefore somewhat odd that the establishment have chosen this year for the erection of a memorial.

According to Carmody Groarke, the designers of the memorial, “This unique civilian memorial marks the 52 lives lost in the four terrorist bombings in London in 2005. It will offer the opportunity for a sense of closure to the bereaved families as well as a public place of remembrance for all that were affected by the bombings.”


Is this memorial unique? Certainly it has been unveiled on an unusual anniversary, but architecturally it follows the model of another memorial to the lies of the criminal elite who mis-rule our land – the Holyhoax Memorial in Berlin.

Both Memorials are set out in the manner of graveyards, with the intention being for the viewer to walk amongst the sculptures. Appropriately, the Hyde Park Memorial to the victims of the establishment is comprised of 52 obelisks, each representing one of the people slain by the agents of the Zionist-controlled Government. The obelisk is a symbol of Illuminised Freemasonry and hides in plain site who the architects of this atrocity really are.

The official story of a small gang of Muslim terrorists evading detection by MI5 and simultaneously detonating four bombs across London is adequately torn apart for the farce that it is, in the video ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’


The establishment organised and carried out the bombings in London, just as their counterparts did in the atrocities in Bali, Madrid, and the New York World Trade Centre. MI5 has had years of practice killing British civilians in their playground of operations in the North of Ireland. The Omagh bombing, for example, which was blamed on Irish separatists was a 100% State operation. The Irish Separatists / Republicans / Nationalists involved were bought and paid for by the London and Dublin branches of the Zionist Establishment. Just as in Ireland, the London murders were organised by the ruling power, and used to justify the implementation of more draconian oppression upon the people of the British Isles.

The timing of the unveiling of the memorial is to suit the elite. They wish to allow those who presided over the murders to gloat. It is possible that in a year’s time, puppets from the Conservative faction of the Party that the establishment use to push their agenda, will govern the British people. Prince Charles and his adulteress he lives with, represented the British Royal Family at the unveiling in one of their own Royal Parks. Who better than the man who had the mother of his son and half-son murdered in cold blood in another ritual murder to the God of the Monarchy – Jahbulon/Satan? This was to give the official seal of approval to those who implemented the murders which provided the excuse needed to ratchet up the Police State.

Why was the finger of blame pointed at Islamic extremists? Simply to divert attention away from the religion of the actual culprits. The rulers of Britain are not Muslim, or Christian. They are not even Jewish in the official sense. The establishment is controlled by people who are Ashkenazi in blood, and Sabatean (Satanist) by religion. What better way to hide their crimes than to blame the Muslim population who were brought into this country to disrupt its Cultural-Religious unity and are not popular with the indigenous population to begin with? When people fall for the bait and speak out against the Muslim presence, the establishment have their lackeys in Westminster enact legislation to criminalise religious hatred (which neatly protects the Judaic religion they perversely use as a shield). Our enemy is not stupid. Evil certainly. Stupid no.

Remember those who the establishment murdered this day four years ago. Realise that the tyranny we live under, the surveillance, the intrusion, the abolition of privacy, the wars of aggression which are killing our people as well as innocent foreigners, all stems from the 7th July murders Don’t be a Union Jack waving Royalist and support your owners. Refuse to play their twisted game. Demand the abolition of the Monarchy, the expulsion of the Ashkenazim from whom the rulers sprang, the re-establishment of the cultural homogeneity of the British Isles, and a just freedom for the people to whom these islands truly belong.

Incidentally, the 11th September bombing of the World Trade Centre, written in Roman numbers reads XI/IX (or IX/XI for those who write in the American date sequence). Look into numerology. It may not seem important to the uninitiated, but it seriously matters to them…