EDL campaigning for another Brothers' War

Yesterday (4th February 2012), the English Defence League walked through Leicester to protest against the anti-indigenous policies of the City of London regime who control the fake democratic system of the UK.  Carrying the now familiar banners calling for measures against the Islamification of Europe, the useful idiots of the EDL once again paraded to voice the propaganda of the Israeli-lobby; chanting slogans against the Muslim religion, but remaining silent about the perverse and barbaric religion of their Talmudic controllers.  Doubtless many of the individuals present were motivated by a genuine concern for their country, but by refusing to accept the need to remove all alien cultures, they were, as usual, aiding the anti-European mafia and the multi-cultists by focusing on one group alone - the easy and highly visible Muslim targets.

The EDL are very much the BUF of today.  Just as Oswald Mosley infamously told his supporters to join the army and fight against Germany in 1939, Tommy Robinson's followers are being misled by a wolf in sheep's clothing.  Mosley professed to be against Organised Jewry and war with our brothers and sisters on the continent, but when war came, he ordered his British Union of Fascists to enlist and fight in a war which he had repeatedly argued was against the interests of all the people of Europe.  Many BUF members died fighting for the Talmudic monarchy and the City of London.  Now, it seems, the EDL are keen to follow this treacherous example by ceaselessly propagandising against Islam in preparation for the Zionist war against Iran.

The EDL differ from the BUF insofar as the latter were motivated by a noble ideal; the preservation of Europe and the European people, even if ultimately they were betrayed by their leader.  The EDL have no such idealism and are straight-forward lackeys of the Establishment.

In a disgraceful display of sycophantic subservience to the Zionist regime in the City, in addition to the routine pro-Israel and anti-Islam propaganda, the protest in Leicester featured a despicable pledge of loyalty to the war-mongers who are not only seeking a fight with Iran, but also those who wish to drag the UK into a war against Argentina.

Far from defending England, the EDL promote every vice of the Establishment.  They oppose Islam because of a blind acceptance of the sexual laissez-faire of the libertine and diseased ruling class; not due to a sense of Christian morality.  Their chants in support of British rule of the Falkland Islands / Islas Malvinas have nothing to do with defending the British people in the Isles from foreign occupation, as is evidenced by their support for non-European immigration and multi-culturalism in the homeland.  The EDL are happy to march with non-Muslim Pakistanis and to push the Establishment lie that the people of Poland are wrecking the UK.  Now they are attacking our European brothers and sisters in Argentina, simply because their handlers have ordered them to.

Will the Anglo-Saxons ever learn to think before following orders?  Will they ever take the courage to follow the difficult path of self-reliance, rather than militaristic obedience?  Sadly, the EDL typify the Anglo-Saxon problem, which boils down to a reluctance to do what is right, when the easy option is to do what the self-appointed leaders (and their handlers) dictate.

Wake up England.  Just as the brave and patriotic men who perished in the Great War were misled and betrayed, so were those who died in the Second World War; again fighting for the Zionist mafia against the true interests of Europe.  This mentality must be overcome, lest the next major conflagration pushes us back to the times after the destruction of the previous hi-tech societies which now only are partially known in our mythology and folk-memory.

No to war against Syria and Iran.  No to any more Brothers Wars whatsoever, whether in mainland or overseas Europe.  And no to the likes of the Zionist fronts of the EDL and their equally odious, contrived false rivals, the UAF.  It is time for Europeans, and especially Anglo-Saxons, to awaken from our Zionist-induced slumber, and follow the more difficult, but only acceptable path; the path of freedom through understanding and refusing to submit to false leaders.  The alternative is the death of our culture, and quite possibly of our people.

Is pregnancy unethical? Yes, says UK bioethicist

Reproduced from Bioedge.org, written byMichael Cook.

Here is contrarian bioethics at its best. Pregnancy and childbirth are so painful, risky and socially restrictive for women that public funding should urgently be directed to the development of artificial wombs. This is the only way to achieve true equality between men and women for then neither women nor men would then be limited by having children and the burdens of reproducing the species would be shared equally.

This is the radical suggestion made by a leading British bioethicist, Anna Smajdor, of the University of East Anglia.

Artificial gestation, or ectogenesis, is currently science fiction, but it may be possible. Dr Smajdor believes that in a truly liberal society pregnancy and childbirth should not be tolerated:

Changes to financial and social structures may improve things marginally, but a better solution needs to be found. Either we view women as baby carriers who must subjugate their other interests to the well-being of their children or we acknowledge that our social values and level of medical expertise are no longer compatible with “natural” reproduction.

Pregnancy is barbaric, Dr Smajdor contends – an illness so serious that it is comparable to measles, which is also occasionally fatal, but does not last nine months.

I suggest that there is a strong case for prioritising research into ectogenesis as an alternative to pregnancy. I conclude by asking the reader the following: if you did not know whether you would be a man or a woman, would you prefer to be born into Society A, in which women bear all the burdens and risks of pregnancy, or Society B, in which ectogenesis has been perfected.

Her article in the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is a reply to a critique of an article which she published in 2007, “The moral imperative for ectogenesis”. ~ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, January

Such is the true voice of liberalism: demanding intolerance of nature; promoting the most radical and extreme political ideology under the guise of science; promoting materialism as the be-all and end-all of life.  This is horrific.  Thankfully this lunatic view is in the minority.  Unfortunately, the self-appointed elite of the world are also a minority, and it is from these enemies of humanity that such 'humanist' evil comes.  Scary days indeed.  It is worth visiting the original article to read the comments section.  We cannot allow such evil as the thoughts of Anna Samjdor to go unchallenged.

Related articles:

UK National Health Service promotes Euthanasia

Bioethicists insist it is perfectly acceptable to take human life

Final Conflict Shop back online

The Final Conflict Shop is back online after a prolonged absence due to technical difficulties.  Selling historical works as well as ideological material, the FC shop is well-worth a visit.

An excellent resource is the FC CD Rom collection, which at 99p per disc, is easily affordable.  There are at present four different CD Roms available, although five were produced.  Each CD is packed with literature, music, archived newsletters and videos.  I would highly recommend everyone stock up on these CDs, which are a perfect starting point for anyone who wishes to explore the non-reactionary part of the 'nationalist' world.

With reasonable prices, even the most kosher-wallet could be tempted with something not readily found in mainstream shops, although those seeking designer kippahs may have to look elsewhere...

Printable RFID: Paying for our own serfdom.

Printable RFID is set to revolutionise the surveillance state.  Ink laced with graphite is now a whisker away from mass production.  This will allow for RFID to be produced very inexpensively, requiring nothing more than the specialised ink, and a printer.  Rather than the surveillance state becoming a distant and obviously alien entity, it is set to become ever more pervasive.

When George Orwell wrote 1984, he described a horrific future in which the central authority ruled over everyone through censorship and control of information.  That nightmare world has come to be our reality.  Orwell's imaginary world had an all-powerful State standing in opposition to the controlled people.  As the roll out of RFID shews, the neo-Orwellian State is much more dangerous than the one he envisaged, as the 'us' and 'them' distinction has become eroded to the point that we are able to buy, and implement, the methods of our own serfdom.

Horrific as it seems, WE are the New World Order.  It is said that real change comes from within.  This truth offers the only solution to the burgeoning Police State and International Order.  Disconnecting from the Establishment's society, and rejecting their glossy and fancy gadgets is our only hope for salvation.  This is not going to be easy, but the alternative is a future which makes the tyranny of the present seem like utopia.