Object to Islam? You're a Breivik; a Fascist; a Terrorist!

I like David Icke.  He may be a bit new-agey, and have theories about shape-shifting inter-dimensional reptilians, operating from inside the hollow metallic space-ship which we know as the moon (honestly, he has said all this!) but for all this he does put out a range of information which considered as a whole, makes intriguing reading.

David Icke has summed up the fraudulent money system, and the place of the Rothschilds within it.  He may have stolen the Hegelian Dialectic which he refers to as 'Problem-Reaction-Solution', and taken credit for an idea which is not his - the Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis model; but, for all this, at least he applies the Hegelian methodology in a way which explains the machinations of the global power structure.  As I say, I can't help liking David Icke's style, even though it isn't really his own, and the information he presents is interspersed with a fair dollop of nonsense.

Where I take exception to Mr Icke, is in his pretence at being anti-internationalist, whilst pushing the line that we're all the same and that all differences in nation, culture, spiritualism etc are illusory.  When stripped of the rhetoric, Icke's underlying theme is yet another version of the One World ideology.  Icke's support of obvious shyster, Alex Jones, is troublesome in itself.  Jones is yet another individual who rails against the New World Order but does so in a manner which deflects from the real enemy.  He speaks of Germanic Death Cults (which he omits to mention are led by Khazars), and claims that he has infiltrated and filmed meetings of the inner elite, and simply strolled out of such meetings without any trouble from the Establishment, who incidentally own the radio network he broadcasts on. 

The ranting Texan and the English hippy (who worked for the State-controlled BBC) make strange bedfellows, but between them stampede those who are aware of the internationalist agenda into a state of inaction, through either fear that the whole drive to a One World State is too powerful to be stopped, or a warm and cosy belief that it is an illusion anyway as we are all a part of infinite consciousness (again a reinterpretation of a philosophical argument, in this case Plato's allegory of the cave, mixed in with the first Matrix film).  The impact of such manipulation is for the followers of Jones to buy protest DVDS and get the popcorn out as the Police State goes global; whilst those who hang on to Icke's every word at least don't get sucked into Jones' fear vortex, but do become complacent due to the belief that everything will be alright in the end, man.  Pass the reefer!

Under the headline 'An Up and Coming Female Breivik', David Icke has posted the following video:

(Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htshvId51UE&feature=player_embedded)

This video shews a woman who objects to Islam, and goes so far as to burn the Qu'ran.  She selectively quotes passages which are abhorrent, but fails to mention that the Talmud could be used with the same result.  Indeed the history of every major religion could be picked at to provide evidence of nastiness and inhuman practices.  The eastern religions so beloved of Icke's disciples have as bloodthirsty a history as Islam, or Christianity, and of course, Judaism, with its offshoots of Marxism, Feminism, Liberalism, Capitalism etc can outdo all religions put together.

What irks is the notion that a woman who practices Free Speech, is labelled as an up and coming Breivik.  Censorship is a dangerous path to walk.  Views which are objectionable are as valid as those which are nice and make one feel warm inside.  Indeed, without objectionable views to keep us alert, we fall into a trance-like state and become vulnerable to all who are willing to publicly go along with our way of life, but privately undermine and destroy us.  Isn't that the essence of liberalism, and political correctness?  Sanctioning people because their opinions may be hurtful, is the modus operandi of the internationalists.  It is worrisome to see Icke adopting the tactics of the global enemy.  Yes, the woman in the video may be speaking in a manner which is offensive to Muslims, but if we are serious about freedom, we have to accept that some people will always speak in a manner which is unpleasant.  To use the English saying which is now tantamount to incitement to forbidden free thought,  'Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but WORDS will NEVER hurt me'.

Breivik is being used to silence all dissent.  He is a gift for the kommissars of political correctness.  Everyone who utters support for the natural society of free and self-contained ethnically and culturally homogeneous countries, can now be labelled as a Breivik.  Those who do not relish the coming Global Police State are called Fascists.  And of course, the common denominator is that these people are dangerous, are terrorists, and that their utterances pollute those who hear them, and for this reason, they must be silenced by all means necessary.

We are used to hearing such Stalinist rhetoric from our Fabian politicians and media.  What is alarming is to hear such nonsense from the Truth Movement.  Freedom with qualifications as to what can be discussed, is not freedom, but disguised tyranny.  Yes the woman in the video may be professing views which serve the Zionist agenda, but she has every right to say what she likes.  Her argument can be countered and debated, but to label her as persona non grata -  a Breivik, terrorist etc - only legitimises the culture of censorship which our would-be rulers are fomenting.  

We need to ensure that the oft quoted words of Voltaire are upheld as a way of life for the preservation of all our freedoms.  We may not agree with what other people say, but we must fight for their right to say it, even, nay especially, when it is hurtful and thereby challenging.  If we allow censorship on any issue, we give credibility to those who wish to silence debate on the Holyhoax, Man-made Climate Change, the Money System, Zionism, Palestine, and indeed every issue which the Establishment seek to control.  This isn't the first time that Icke has travelled the censors' road.  If alarm bells were ringing in the background, they have gone up a few decibels.  Maybe his close relationship with Alex Jones isn't so peculiar afterall...

The Jewish Siege of Europe

The following article is by Nathanael Kapner of Real Zionist News. I reproduce it here in full as it contains information everyone should be aware of, especially the supremacist, anti-Goy, European Jewish Parliament...

_________________

THE JEWISH SIEGE OF EUROPE is now in full battle manoeuvres, engagement and encirclement.

Under the umbrella of the European Jewish Union, (the uniting structure for all Jewish organisations throughout Europe), a brand new No-Goys-Allowed organisation was inaugurated on February 17, 2012, the “first ever” European Jewish Parliament.

Although the European Jewish Parliament is an obvious racist organization, the EU Parliament, which claims to represent ALL minorities, opened its doors to these Christ-Hating Jews by allowing them to hold their “inaugural” ceremony in its own headquarters in Brussels.

Hailed as a “great day” for Europe, 120 members of the European Jewish Parliament toasted their election with declarations of it marking an “historic event” in which “one assembly standing for one cause” further “empowers” European Jewry.

And that Jewish “empowerment” wasted no time in making demands upon the cowering Gentile European majority, (once known as Christendom before Jewry’s onslaught), insisting on the termination of Lady Catherine Ashton as the EU’s foreign minister.

AN ALL-OUT JEWISH blood-lust campaign against Baroness Ashton is now armed to the teeth in which the Jewish Parliament is demanding that she either “repent” or “resign.” View Jew Demand Here.

The Jewish hysteria centres around Ashton’s comments on April 13 regarding the killing of four Jews at the Ozar Hatorah school in Toulouse France last month.  Condemning Lady Ashton for drawing a “despicable” moral equivalent between the Toulouse killings and the Israeli assaults on Gaza, the European Jewish Parliament wants nothing less than Ashton’s blood.

Evidently, Jewry pays no gratitude to those who host their Jewish balls and ceremonies, namely, Brussels, which gave the Jews full use of its parliamentary headquarters on February 17, 2012.  Only two months later, the Jews repaid Brussels by demanding it throw its highly esteemed foreign minister into the rubbish heap and flush her down the toilet.  SUCH is the manner of the Jew: vicious castigation, arrogance, ingratitude, and overweening hubris.

WHEN JEWRY WAS FORBIDDEN 

CHRISTIAN BYZANTIUM extended from the Balkans to Western Europe during the 4th through 15th Centuries AD.  Thus, the Byzantine Empire, (not taught, of course, in Jew-run Public Schools and Colleges), was known to its inhabitants as “Rhomania” because Constantine the Great, Byzantium’s first Emperor from 306 to 337 AD, established the empire’s centre in Constantinople as the “New Rome.” 

In addition to being a Christian civilisation in which the Church worked in “symphony” with the State, (as today in Putin’s Russia), Byzantium had one further characteristic, namely, its claim to be the direct continuation of the Roman Empire, a claim maintained until its fall in 1453 at the hands of Muslim invaders. One essential feature of the Byzantine Empire was its policy toward the Jews. This policy was codified by Emperor Justinian in the 6th Century AD, popularly known as, “The Code of Justinian.” 

 

JUSTINIAN’S CODE FORBADE Jews from holding civil office and teaching positions. Even part of the Orthodox Church’s “canon law” prohibited its members from seeking out “remedies” from Jewish physicians.  Compiling various laws regarding the Jews that were established before him into a legal codification, Justinian forbade Jews:

+ To engage in proselytism;  
+ To marry Orthodox Christian women;  
+ To possess Orthodox Christian servants;  
+ To hold office or honours in the Roman state;  
+ To build new synagogues;  
+ To read the Old Testament in Hebrew but rather in Greek which did not cut out  the prophecies that pointed to Jesus Christ;  
+ To use Judaic interpretations of the Old Testament;  
+ To bear witness in court against an Orthodox Christian;  
+ To hold teaching positions in Roman schools or as private tutors.

The culmination of Justinian’s “Codex” was the denial of Roman citizenship to the Jews and relegating them to the rank of second class citizens.  In spite of Jewry calling Justinian an “anti-Semite,” the Orthodox Church not only honours him as a great Emperor but also as a great saint. View Entire Prohibitions Here, Here, Here & Here.

THE SOLUTION TO THE JEWISH PROBLEM is for Europe to return to its Christian roots—the historical Church—in which the “evangelical” error that posits the Jew as “chosen” and having some “special” role to play has no place.

Neo-paganism and idyllic myths that salivate over Indo-European “gods” promoted by White-Identity Websites will only provide the Jew with yet another stepping stone to greater hegemony over the political affairs of European society.

Wagner (a profound master) and his operas indeed are milestones in the evolution of classical music.  But to elevate Wagner’s Nordic Wordens and Fricas to realms of some new European “reformation” is not only laughable but historically shallow.

“Europe Is The Church and The Church Is Europe!” said the great 20th Century historian, Hilaire Belloc.

It is via the historical Church, and ONLY the historical Church, that the Jewish siege of Europe can be opposed, dismantled, and ultimately destroyed.

Breivik the Zionist: Enemy of Nationalism

As the trial of Anders Breivik continues, the internationalists are using the Breivik case to libel all Nationalists as would-be terrorists.  It is indicative of the liberal extremist mindset, that any expression of loyalty to nation or country is now labelled 'Fascist'.  In the following video from Russia Today, opposition to the Islamification of the UK is referred to as the politics of the Far Right.  Thus love of our Christian heritage, and the desire to protect our people from the spread of the incompatible ideologies and faiths of those who dwell in immigrant colonies and openly express hatred of the European nation, is now deemed a form of extremism!  It is obvious to anyone who has had dealings with the 'anti-Fascists' that they exist to police the people into accepting the borderless soul-less one world State, and that their condemnation of anyone as extremist, is incredibly hypocritical.

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=dwxq_ml0T0o

Anders Breivik is a Zionist.  His outspoken support for homosexuality, freemasonry, Jewish-occupied Palestine et al are proof that he is not a Nationalist.  His murder of Norwegians, (such as the girl pictured to the right), when he could just as easily have butchered Pakistanis, creates a hatred of Nationalism amongst those who do not look behind the media lies.  Of course, murdering anyone is unacceptable, but in Oslo where around 10% of the population is Muslim, surely he could have made his point without killing Norwegians?

The ideology espoused by Breivik in the video which follows, makes a strong case against the multi-cultists.  When Islamic countries such as Egypt introduce laws to allow men to have sex with the corpses of their dead wives, it is only natural that Europeans should be disgusted by those who advocate - and carry out - such practices.  However, coupling murder to ideology, only serves to undermine the ideology itself, and in the case of the murderer of Norwegian children, that acts of terror do not strengthen Europe, but weaken us.  The means must always be consistent with the end.  Attempts to justify the unjustifiable are the product of Talmudic thought and have no place in Europe. 

Direct Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlceKEiir6I&feature=related

We who fight against internationalism, do so because we love our people, and indeed we see the value of all people.  We respect the rights of everyone to live amongst his and her own kind, immersed in the indigenous culture, as part of an unbroken chain linking our ancestors to those yet to come.  Internationalism is the great threat which seeks to destroy all humanity.  We may not agree with the Jewish worldview, but we respect the right of the Jews to live together unmolested by non-Jews - indeed we support the right of all Jews to relocate to the Jewish State (Birobidjan, not Palestine) and live at peace with their neighbours.  Breivik has tarred the name of the anti-internationalists by associating our struggle with terrorism.  This, of course, is the reason for the atrocities commited in Oslo, which Breivik has claimed responsibility for, but were more than likely the work of the MOSSAD.

Breivik was not alone on Utoya Island.  He did not have the time or opportunity to plant the bombs in Oslo.  The whole Breivik case stinks of Zionist orchestration, and is definitely a false flag designed to crush genuine dissent to the international order.  We can now see why groups such as the EDL were formed: to bring those who oppose mass immigration into the spotlight, and then to use them to scapegoat genuine opponents of the international cabal.  Don't be fooled by the likes of Breivik.  Just like 9/11, 7/7, Pearl Harbour, the Madrid and Bali bombings, the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, both World Wars, and many many other acts of pure evil, the Oslo atrocity was the work of the Elders of Zion.  And yet again, those who oppose their tyranny, face persecution as scape-goats for crimes committed by the real enemy of all humanity.

The Argentine government's fraudulent nationalisation of YPF

The Argentine government's fraudulent nationalisation of YPF

by Cunctator

The so-called nationalisation [of YPF] by Jewess [President] Kirchner is just another swindle by our favourite culture-distorting tribe. The person behind the measure is Argentina's deputy economy minister Axel Kicillof, grandson of an Odessa Rabbi. He is a close friend of Kirchner's son. Protected in this "expropriation" (i.e. theft) of Repsol's stake in the company is the 25 per cent stake of the powerful Jewish Eskenazi family, who are close personal friends of Jewess Kirchner.

Now here is where it gets interesting. The Eskenazis did not actually *pay* for their stake in YPF. The terms of the crooked deal struck by the equally Jew-ridden government which brokered the original deal between the Spanish oil company and the then-floundering YPF - which was completely broke and so corrupt and inefficient that it could not even finance new exploration despite Argentina's abundant oil and gas resources - insisted that Repsol buy the shares on behalf of the Jewish Eskenazis which they would then pay for out of their share of future income streams! Have you ever heard of such a deal?

Imagine if Shell were about to buy a UK-owned oil company, OnceGreatBritainOil, and the UK government insisted that they could only control 51 per cent of the company; even though they would pay for 76 per cent of the shares, they must give 25 per cent to Mr and Mrs Rufus with the government retaining the remaining 24 per cent. Mr and Mrs Rufus would promise to pay Shell for 'their' 25 per cent stake out of their share of future OnceGreatBritainOil company profits!

Now, surprise surprise, the Jewish Eskenazis still owe Repsol billions for shares which they were assigned but have not paid for, but the so-called patriotic Argentine government has insisted that the Eskenazis will retain their stake; the only shares that are to be confiscated are Repsol's. So to cut a long story short the Spaniards are being doubly screwed by Jews. Their own shares, for which they paid many billions, investing many billions more over the years to restore YPF to profitability have been stolen; they will be lucky to get ten cents in the dollar in compensation in the corrupt Jew-run Argentine courts. But to add insult to injury, shares which they also effectively paid for, and which they were forced to cede to the Eskenazis and for which they now will never be paid, have been ring-fenced for the Jewish swindlers who obviously hatched this plan with Kirchner for their own benefit. The Eskenazis will keep a 25 per cent stake for which they have paid practically nothing. Kirchner and her cronies will no doubt get a hefty commission.

All this has been brought to you by the Jewish Kirchner, the Jewish Eshkenazi and the Jewish Kicillof the thirty-something rabbi's grandson - who incidentally is sleeping with his friend's mother, the sexuagenarian would-be sexpot Cristina who believes that being permanently attired in mourning black makes her more attractive to young gigolos like the ambitious rabbi's grandson. You couldn't make it up. Argentina is completely controlled by Jews and nothing goes on there that has not been first decided by the local Kahal. The judiciary, press, finance, media, government, big business and education are pretty much Jewish monopolies.

 
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/pact-mandates-repsol-to-buy-eskenazis-ypf-stake/472161/

You might notice from the above link that it is being made to look as if the Eskenazis have themselves been discomfited by the expropriation, and are at loggerheads with the Argentine government. This is just typical smoke and mirrors from the people that Schopenhauer described as "the great masters of the lie".

The Eskenazis are just the Argentine equivalent of 'Lucky Larry' Silverstein who made $7 billion when the twin towers fell (on the basis that the plane strikes - which as anyone with the most rudimentary grasp of the laws of physics knows, were not the reason the buildings collapsed - constituted *two* separate events). Shameless Jewish profiteers from crimes committed against others.

The true situation is even worse than it first appears. Because the original deal, which was brokered by Kirchner's now-deceased husband and predecessor as president, mandated the aggressive ninety per cent dividend policy which was enabling the Eskenazis to pay for their shares, and because the expropriation has seen the Eskenazi who ran the company sidelined (for show) and the dividend policy reversed, the Eskenazis are now *suing* the wronged party Repsol for the payments they were formerly getting.

So according to these Jews, the 25 per cent stake they still haven't paid for is not enough; they are now suing the company that effectively underwrote their purchase of the shares and which was enabling them to pay for them in installments (by a completely madcap dividend policy which was preventing Repsol from doing as much capital spending as they would have liked, but the Sapanish firm still managed to spend several billions more per year for exploration and production than under the previous corrupt and inefficient regime and increased output by several hundred per cent) for continued payments even though of course Repsol's economic interest in the company has just been terminated by an act of legislative fiat which of course would be recognised as *force majeure* in any but a Jew-run court in a banana republic without bananas like Argentina.

You see the reason I compare them with Larry Silverstein who *borrowed* $100 million for a lease on the two WTC buildings and then because he was involved in the planning of the false flag event on 9/11 promptly fired all the security and building management people and brought in Urban Moving Systems and the other Mossad operatives who helped the specialist demolitions firm they used to plant the thermate or whatever it was they used to take the building down in the perfect controlled demolitions we all saw (and which the media announced was down to structural damage caused by fire) when Larry gave the order for them to "pull it".

On the back of this huge investment for which he no doubt expended great rivers of blood, sweat and tears, Larry was very happy to sue for, and win, his "rightful" compensation of $7 billion. Not one penny of the money this swindler deceitfully extorted from Lloyds of London, Swiss Re and Munich Re in this way went to the families of the 3,000+ people to whose murders he was a willing accomplice.

There comes a point when one has to stop joking ruefully about "chutzpah" and start questioning the viability of sharing a planet with conscienceless dæmons such as these, who will do quite literally *anything* for their beloved *geld*.

Their so-called religion is, as some prominent leaders amongst them have in the past frankly admitted - "Judaism is not a religion but a Law religionized." Moses Mendelssohn - simply a DIY kit for subverting, undermining, corrupting, profiting from and ultimately enslaving the hated Goyim. There is no spiritual content at all: the nearest they get to that is the maxim which outwardly observant ones amongst them - in other words, the biggest hypocrites, such as the Eskenazis and Silverstein - hold dearest to their hearts: "when Moshiach comes, all the gold of the Goy will belong to Jews".

I think it's safe to assume from the illustrations above that faithful little servants of Moshiach (Satan) like Larry and the Eskenazis are not exactly folding their arms and waiting for him to turn up. Indeed, our Lord Jesus in the parable of the unjust steward ironically commended the industry by Satan's servants on behalf of their master (Luke 16: 1-13) that we can see in the actions of the Eskenazis and Larry Silverstein.  

The link between the two distinct points I have made (the population deception and the inside story behind the YPF expropriation) actually explains the mistake of researchers who refer to the Argentine as a European nation and side with them in their dispute with the Zionists who run with the UK.  The reality is that there is no dispute; the Zionists who run Argentina are both in this case and in the Malvinas controversy merely covering themselves in the flag and using nationalism to enrich themselves and increase their hold on power.

When one with only a superficial knowledge of the country thinks of the racial makeup of Argentina he thinks of Spaniards, Italians, a smattering of escaped Nazi war criminals and a sprinkling of immigrants from all over the rest of Europe. What he doesn't realize is that this describes only the relatively unimportant 95 per cent of the population which has merely replaced the long since wiped out Indians as the peons and serfs of that society. The other five per cent control absolutely everything, and they are Jews.

The riff raff on the streets attacking the British embassy and cheering the theft of assets that other people have paid for are anything but the elite; they are the scum that Jews like Kirchner always need to pander to to maintain their hold on power. I have come to the conclusion that whenever one sees an appeal to patriotism or even nationalism by a leader these days then you can take it as a given that he is either a Jew or a creature of the Jews. The days of Codreanu are long since gone and these days accidents can be arranged long before anyone who is a threat in that respect can come to national prominence. Their demise will ultimately come but it will come in an entirely unexpected way that none of us can yet foresee; let us put to one side fantasies about the likes of Putin or Ahmadinejad saving us.

One of the single biggest disinformation successes that the Jews have achieved in recent times is the global misrepresentation of their true numbers. This, the holocaust deception, and the lie that they are a religious community rather than a worldwide criminal network united only by their hatred of Christ are the three legs upon which this world-straddling anti-human *Golem* primarily rests.

Argentina is entirely typical of the way Jews hide their numerical strength. Jews are constantly under-reporting their numbers in order to give legitimacy to the Holohoax and to disarm threats with the “there are only a few million of us poor persecuted Jews worldwide; how could we possibly be running the world from behind the scenes?” In reality there are a minimum of 35 million and probably many millions more Jews worldwide – a far cry from the 16 million officially claimed. Of these 35 million plus, at least 20 million live in the United States. 

Whilst there are officially only 200,000 in Argentina, the real number is at least 2 million – and when you understand that the real figure is at least ten times larger than the claimed figure you can see how they can stealthily gain a vice-like grip over an entire country whilst making it taboo to so much as point out their exclusive hold on “top positions” in any given country

Of the 35-40 million Jews I am convinced are currently in existence worldwide, how many are part of the organized global criminal conspiracy of which we see so many signs daily? Having lived in London for many years, it is virtually impossible to overstate the answer, and hence, the extent of the problem.

In London there are allegedly just 150,000 Jews (58 per cent of the total Jewish population of the UK); by the time I had graduated from a prominent London university which was well known as a traditional haunt of such dangerous Jewish “thinkers” as Laski and Popper, I felt that I had personally become acquainted with at least twice that many!

Friends of mine who have lived in other cities such as Leeds and Manchester have noticed the exact same thing. I would say there are a minimum 1.5 million Jews in the UK, rather than the less than 300,000 that is cited in official statistics.

In 1898, at the very beginning of the massive influx of many millions of these people who were fleeing from so-called 'Tsarist oppression' in Russia (rather than invading America, the new designated ‘official host’ under instructions from their leaders in the scores of Kahals dotted across Eastern Europe and Russia), Mark Twain noticed the same phenomenon in the United States and made the following point in Harper’s Magazine:

“When I read in the C. B. [Cyclopedia Britannica] that the Jewish population of the United States was 250,000, I wrote the editor, and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that in my country, and that his figures were without a doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. I also added that I was personally acquainted with that many there; but that was only to raise his confidence in me, for it was not true.

His answer miscarried, and I never got it; but I went around talking about the matter, and people told me they had reason to suspect that for business reasons many Jews whose dealings were mainly with the Christians did not report themselves as Jews in the census. It looked plausible; it looks plausible yet. Look at the city of New York; and look at Boston, and Philadelphia, and New Orleans, and Chicago, and Cincinnati, and San Francisco - how your race swarms in those places!”

Twain was right; it’s no joke.

References:

http://english.telam.com.ar/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14527:the-president-critical-of-a-la-nacion-editorial-for-being-benevolent-towards-the-holocaust&catid=42:politics

http://en.mercopress.com/2012/03/14/the-lady-out-of-control-appeals-to-nazi-mengele-and-anti-semitism-to-attack-the-media

http://www.startribune.com/world/147719015.html?page=all&prepage=1&c=y#continue

Establishment Pædophiles sexualising children

The UK Establishment grows more degenerate by the day.  Having pushed for an ever lower age of consent, and equality for buggery alongside healthy and natural sex, the perverts in power are now pushing to undermine the age of consent, and effectively abolish it.

The National Health Service is the chief cause of ill health in the UK.  It pushes vaccines laced with carcinogens and with other toxic products; it uses the barbaric allopathic practices which do not treat illness but merely cover up symptoms, and butcher patients.  The NHS in the UK gives free sex-changes (sexual mutilation which in no way makes a male female, or female male) to perverts and the mentally ill, whilst destroying the health of those who take their poisons.  It is a vast drain on resources and an excuse for the economic rape of the taxpayer.  It stands in opposition to natural homœopathic medicine and all forms of medicine which work.  The NHS is the pimp of the pharmaceutical industry, and it seeks to turn our daughters into whores.

The NHS is now at the forefront of a battle to give the Contraceptive Pill to all teenage girls from age 13 to 16, well below the legal age of consent.  In Lambeth and Southwark (Southeast London), children are able to walk into a dispensing chemist and ask for the Pill, without any referral to a Doctor or any consultation with parents.  Very immature girls who have been force-fed the pornographic propaganda of the music industry and the 'entertainment' media, have come to identify self-worth with popularity.  In our diseased society, popularity equates to promiscuity.  

The Education system sexualises children by teaching in sex education lessons that all types of sex are equally good, and that everyone should experiment with homosexuality and sexual relations with other races.  The education system teaches sex education to children as young as five years old.  By the time they are teenagers, children are so immersed in pornography from the media, music industry, and direct from the State, that they feel they have to be sexually active.  Films such as 40 Year Old Virgin, ridicule those who 'cannot' get sex.  Newspaper articles such as the Daily Mail's revelations about Millie Mackintosh, paint those who do not engage in promiscuity, as weird.  All this makes children feel they must be promiscuous, and as soon as possible.  This is a pædophile's wet dream come true.

The liars in the State argue that there is a teenage pregnancy crisis which can only be addressed by encouraging girls to use contraceptives.  The fact that contraceptives can cause sterility for a considerable time is not mentioned, nor is the increased risk in contracting venereal diseases.  The destruction of childhood; the deliberate focus upon children as consumers of make-up and other tat; the whole sex industry of the media; none of these are discussed.  Childhood pregnancy is a problem in the UK, but it is because of the policies of the State, not in spite of them.

Children are precious.  They are our future.  Children should be looked after, treated as appropriate to their ages, and protected from the evils of the outside world.  Parents who allow their children to watch television (especially music videos of the Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Rihanna etc variety) are exposing their children to child abuse.  Leaving your child in the care of music videos and so-called teen television is akin to giving your child to the local pædophile.  The State-sanctioned education system is home to many pædophile teachers, and the teaching of sex education is absolutely designed to socially engineer healthy children into soul-less monsters fit to belong to the international order.  The depravity of the State Schools began in the 'Public Schools' where our Establishment were schooled.  It is from the elite Public Schools that the term 'Fag' comes from.  Having an Establishment of deviants, is it any wonder that State policy is perverse and destructive?

We need to Home School our children.  We need to turn off the television.  We need to learn and practice real natural medicine.  We need to be parents, and take responsibility for our own children.  Those who prioritise work above their children and put their children into nurseries from a year old, are condemning their own kin to the clutches of those who seek to destroy them.  The measures to protect our children are hard, but that is no excuse to take the simple option and allow the State to control our lives and the lives of our children.  This country is dying because people do not take responsibility for their own lives and the lives of their loved ones.  Until this changes, and people refuse to cooperate with the State in any form (Education, Healthcare, Media, Law, Tax) we will remain trapped.

Those who deal contraceptives to children are accomplices to pædophilia, and they must be dealt with accordingly.  I have a pædophile living in my neighbourhood, and the police patrol to protect him from the families nearby who would just love to lynch the inhuman beast.  The police are servants of the pædophile Establishment, and now its seems so are those who dispense contraceptives to children.  I appeal to NHS workers to refuse to collaborate in the destruction of our children.  Those who 'go with the flow' deserve to be drowned in the sewer they are a part of.

Welfare-dependency is killing Europe, as intended

Yesterday the London Borough of Newham was highlighted for pleading with areas outside London to take 500 Welfare-dependent families off their hands.  In the wake of this spectacle, the very important, but seldom raised question of the culture of Welfare-dependency must be considered.

The UK is sick.  A century ago, the human stock of the country was strong and vibrant.  Now it is weak and decadent.  The slaughter of the UK's finest in the Great War damaged the genepool in ways of which we are only now becoming aware.  In the second half of that same conflict (following the pause from the end of 1918 to late 1939), the job of obliterating the best of humanity in Europe, was completed.  The rise of the anti-humans such as Winston Churchill has continued apace until now we have in parliament the double act of the Jewish Capitalist Cameron and his sidekick Clegg, 'opposed' by the Jewish Communist Miliband.  A healthy nation would not allow such people to take the helm of State.

Following the cessation of open anti-European warfare in 1945, the incoming Labour government put into practice the Fabian Socialist dream of the Welfare State.  The Labour Party is a part of the Establishment, and so the creation of the Welfare State was not to benefit the people, but to increase the control the ruling powers have over us.

In response to the article about Newham, a reader, Cunctator, wrote the following:

In Merseyside and other conurbations we see the tragic consequences of welfarist policies in the literally scores of thousands of cases we are now seeing of the third successive generation of distinct and truly indigenous clans which have no experience, or even memory, of what it is to work for a living. All is paid for, and ad infinitum, by the welfare apparatus. Meanwhile Eastern Europeans and others are coming in and taking jobs which could easily be done by members of these local families but which they have become disincentivized to do by virtue of having become all too comfortable. And why not? After all, there seems to be no stigma attached to living on benefits.

This is sadly very true.  The advent of Social Housing and Unemployment 'Benefits' has allowed for the wilfully idle to live without creating anything of use to the country.  There is a section of the people who are welfare-dependent by choice, and have in many ways become judaised, insofar as they scorn the dignity of labour and they cannot appreciate the value of providing for one's kin by one's own work.  The ideology that 'the State will Provide' has become endemic in much of the UK.  I know families who will telephone the Council for the pettiest of reasons; for example, to replace a hinge on a gate.  They will then moan that it can take the Council days to attend to them, not even considering that it would only take a few minutes to repair the gate themselves.  Social Housing encourages laziness and a handout mentality.  This of course is the whole idea.  As Cuncator continues,

Welfarism was a snare, a trap from the very first. Far from helping the common people as a safety net, welfare was conceived by the usurers as a means of further enslaving the masses by giving their oppressors an ostensible justification for:

(1) the continued borrowing by governments of the debt money created out of thin air by private bank;

(2) the taxes, particularly graduated income taxes, land taxes and death duties that needed to be collected from the Goyim in order to ensure that our lords and masters got the counterfeit 'money' they had created out of thin air and lent to Gentile governments back. It is only once you understand that the far more of the money collected in taxes by governments goes towards paying the interest on fake national debts than is used to supply the more or less chimerical "public services", that you can begin to grasp the extent of the deception at the heart of the system.

"Oh, we only have a trillion pound debt because we have welfare commitments inherited from Labour", says Gideon Osborne on budget day. And the boobs fall for it. But the truth is that the UK has a trillion pound debt because it has repaid the Rothschilds ten times over (and counting) for the money that said family of usurers loaned to Pitt the Younger to fight the Napoleonic wars (1794-1815).

And Gideon the obsequious continues to pay the interest - never the principal! - on the original loan at five per cent like the good little Shabbat Goy he is. (You remember how giddy with exultation - "I've arrived!" - was Gideon when he was invited to Nat Rothschild's yacht to socialise with that usurer's creatures, such as, for instance, one of his main Russian-Jewish Mafia/Semya/Mishpucka underbosses Deripaska, and the disgusting Mandelson, who was and remains his main conduit to his minions in the labour 'leadership').

When you think of all the other pointless wars that have been fought since 1815 one can easily understand that the trillion sterling, obscene as it is, is almost certainly a serious underestimate which the usurers allow the UK elites to get away with as a special favour because "after all, they *have* been so accommodating over the centuries".

These points are very interesting.  The Welfare State has not only created an underclass of 'scroungers' who are happy to be idle and have no interest in achieving any level of self-respect, but also it has justified the acceleration of taxation as an everyday reality.  As everything is privatised, the rationale that the State is the guardian of the economy, has become an argument which no longer works.  Thus the myth that the State is responsible for the well-being of the people, is used to justify taxation.

The whole ethos of the Welfare State is a corruption of the Christian (and Muslim) ethos of charity.  In days gone by, people tithed a third of their income to assist the genuinely needy, and this was seen as a duty which was demanded by God.  The Fabian Welfare State is essentially ætheistic, and so cannot appeal to a Higher Purpose for humanity.  With the removal of a divine entity, the Welfare State exists to ensure that the highest power is not God, but is the State itself, and or course the powers behind the State, the Elders of Zion.

The Protocols of Zion state that the fabric of society must be destroyed, and that the focus of the individual must be on material matters.  Karl Marx adapted the Talmudic faith to create the ideology which carries his name.  Marx himself spoke of the lumpenproletariat who are worthless consumers who produce nothing.  Their function is to undermine and weaken society and proletarianise the people as a whole, by sucking the real Workers dry of livable income through intolerable levels of taxation used to pay for them.  The expansion of Welfare must be paid for, and it is upon those who do work that this burden is placed.

In the international paradise envisioned by Marx, the lumpenproletariat will be killed, and there will be no Welfare State.  Welfare is a weapon to undermine society, but it will not be tolerated in the Workers' Republic, in which those who will not work, will die.  Note that Marxist organisations such as the SWP campaign for Jobs.  Those who believe that the 'left' support the workless, are mistaken.

Dignity is a fundamental aspect of humanity.  The ability to feed one's family is a basic requirement of all humanity.  The Welfare State steps in and takes away the right of the people to look after their own.  The Welfare State gives the lumpenproletariat an excuse to be irresponsible.  

In my previous work, I dealt with drug addicts and homeless people.  People who become addicted to Heroin and Crack Cocaine are not stupid.  They know that they stand a very serious chance of becoming addicts, but they choose to continue to take hard drugs because they know that the State will indulge their lifestyle choice, and the woolly-minded liberals will treat their self-inflicted woes as an illness.  Hard drug addiction is pure selfish hedonism, and is a product of the liberal mindset.  

I have worked with homeless people who are more than happy to live on the streets.  It costs the taxpayer a fortune to house junkies, who typically destroy the accommodation given to them, and return to begging (and stealing) as a preferred option.  On one occasion I saw a man begging for money who claimed to be hungry; I bought him a hot drink and some hot food, which he duly threw to the ground!  Parasites such as that individual are very common, as I found in a professional capacity. Without the nanny state, junkies would have no access to free methadone, preferential housing, food parcels, monetary 'Benefits' etc, and would simply change their ways or die.  The Welfare State creates drug addicts, and the law creates their criminal lifestyle.  It would be better to legalise all drugs and sell them at such strength that the hedonistic extremists would soon kill themselves and thus make the world a better place by their departure.

The term 'Benefit' is taken literally by the contrived underclass.  In a sane society, the genuinely vulnerable would be cared for, and the unscrupulous spongers would be forced to provide for themselves or to perish.  We have a moral duty to look after the weaker members of society such as the infirm and disabled, but we have no duty to look after those who are irresponsible and think that they are somehow better than the rest of us and that we owe them a living.  The lumpenproletariat are just as much parasites as the usurious bankers and the free-loading monarchy.

I shall leave the last word to Cunctator, who sums up the issue of the Welfare State and the fraudulent taxation system most admirably.

[People with an understanding of the depths of depravity of the lackeys of finance in the British Establishment should be] calling for the UK government to stop issuing IOUs (gilts/bonds) to private banks for money they have created out of thin air and loaned to the government. Once this parasitic encumbrance has been removed - the government can simply repay the 'national debt' in one go by issuing the banks with fake money to match the fake money that they loaned, and then announcing that the old pound sterling will be retired, and a new one based solely on the credit of the UK government will be issued in its place - the inflation, which is an intrinsic feature of this system, would instantly be completely eliminated; it would be possible to reduce taxes to virtually nothing; prosperity would return to the country; and the disgusting welfarism which has sapped the self-respect and work ethic of vast swathes of the working classes would be a thing of the past (forgiven and forgotten entirely but openly acknowledged for the shameful and self-destructive disaster it has been). If there are to be such things as versions of Housing Benefit, Income Support, Jobseekers' (sic!) Allowance and the other so-called benefits in the interregnum, they should each be strictly limited to six months or at the very most one calendar year for any given claimant. Any longer and people become accustomed to not working. 

What these dubious 'benefits' should never be seen as ... entitlements. We are NOT entitled to any such support from the state. Such thinking only increases the parasites' power over us and leads to dependency such as we're seeing today, where entire generations of a single family think it is their God-given right to sit in their living rooms all day watching satellite television [on ridiculously large screens!] and gorging themselves on fizzy drinks, candy and processed foods, whilst expecting people who work to pick up the tab. What we need is for the government to stay out of our lives as far as possible. This will only be possible once it starts issuing its own credit, thereby automatically reducing the tax burden and ending inflation, deflation and the ensuing "business cycle" of banker-engineered booms and busts.

Once the evil alliance with the international usurers who have been seeking for centuries to enslave us all has been ended, there shall be no further demand for fake 'welfare'

The Benefits Cap used to socially engineer the end of England.

The UK government has been at war with the people for many years, but most people have ignored the actions of the State, thinking that there is nothing which can be done about their plight.  The bland acceptance that we do not really live in a democracy only allows for our enemies to walk all over us.

There are people who are awake to the machinations of the State, but these are skillfully recruited into rival Left-wing and Right-wing camps.  Rather than take a united position and fight the real enemy, those who fall into the divisive Masonic trap, expend their energies ensuring that any realistic assault against the ruling power is stifled before it has a chance to affect the despots.  Whether it is the UAF with their lollipops chanting 'Nazi Scum', or the EDL shouting 'Stand by Israel', the real villains go unexposed.

The London regime are the most visible front of the Establishment and the policies they put in place, are the policies of the global enemy.  The decision by the Liberal Coalition to place an upper limit on the amount of Housing Benefit which anyone can receive, is a part of the internationalist agenda.  At first glance, the limit is reasonable, and makes sense if local authorities are to keep withing their budgets.  The Benefit Cap for Housing benefit stands at £250/£290/£340/£400 respectively for 1/2/3/4 bedroom accommodation, to a maximum of just under £22,000 per year.  Unbelievably, this vast sum does not help to keep the people housed, but rather creates a situation wherein local authorities cannot pay the rents charged by the greedy landlords in their areas.  This is especially the case in London and the Southeast.

Due to the outrageous rents charged by the new Rachmans in the east of London, the London Borough of Newham has approached Stoke-on-Trent to house 500 families which the London Borough cannot afford to pay rent for.  Newham has 32,000 people on its waiting list for social housing.  The waiting list is a driect consequence of the policy of the Thatcher regime of the 1980s to sell most of the country's Social Housing.  This inevitably led to the current situation with greedy private landlords charging ridiculous rents and living off the profits created from what is really a form of exploitation and usury.  

Those who argue that we need more social housing fail to appreciate that this would necessitate concreting over more of the UK.  The population of the UK is well past the point at which the land can sustain the people, and measures are urgently needed to lower it.  Stopping immigration, and returning immigrants to their home countries is not an issue of 'racism', but is vital to pre-empt the potential disaster of mass starvation should the food supplies to the UK be cut at any point, by natural or man-made disaster.  The programme of groups such as the SWP who favour no immigration controls whatsoever, would increase the risk of mass starvation, and be a real crime against humanity, no matter the well-meaning but ill thought out rhetoric of the pro-immigration lobby.

Newham, like much of London, is the place of residence of vast numbers of non-indigenous people, most of whom do not work.  Central Government has presided over mass immigration for decades, offering people from across the world the chance to come to the UK for a better life.  Upon arrival, this offer has proven to be a lie, and colonies of disaffected newcomers have sprung up.  Many people within these colonies do not learn English and although they are physically within the UK, they are not culturally a part of it.  The actions of the government in waging war against the lands from which many of the immigrants have come, has made relocation to the home countries untenable at present.  An end to imperialistic aggression would be a prerequisite for the rebuilding of the home countries in preparation for the relocation of the refugees and others to their own lands.

Newham's Council's plan to relocate so-called disadvantaged people to the North Midlands, is nothing less than the transfer of alien colonies from the capital to the provinces, and with them the transfer of the social problems which have destroyed much of London.  The commitment of central government to continue to flood the UK with asylum seekers and incompatible aliens will mean that should the Newham plan be put into effect, London will act as a staging post for the transfer of immigrants into the areas of the UK which have remained indigenous.  The fact that the Borough of Newham on its own has a 32,000 waiting list, gives evidence to the fact that the capital is already at breaking point.  Newham and other areas of London which have been all but ethnically cleaned of Britons, will become Sangattes on the UK mainland.

Why are Landlords in London allowed to charge rent which would be unthinkable in the rest of the country?  In Yorkshire the rent is 1/4 of that in London, and the housing is larger and better.  Clearly the rent rates are due to extortion by the landlords, and to failure by central government to cap the amount of rent which landlords can charge.  Capping Benefits, but not Rent, is ridiculous.

The bandit State of Israel is offering financial incentives for Jews to move to the Golan Heights in occupied Syria.  Perhaps the unemployable Talmud-reading Jews in London could take advantage of this offer and depart our land, taking their co-racial greedy landlords, and their puppet politicians with them?  They have definitely outstayed their welcome, and as the 1290 Expulsion act is still valid, they have no legal right to darken our shores with their presence.

The UK is an unhappy land ruled by her worst enemies.  The housing crisis in London will not be solved by spreading it to the rest of the country.  The only sensible solution to the housing crisis is to address the real issue, which is over-population and usury.  

To deal with a real problem requires honesty.  To stop the housing crisis, all immigration must cease immediately; the home countries of the newcomers must be protected from the likes of NATO and BP, who have made them uninhabitable through war and theft of resources; the amount of rent anyone can charge must be capped so as to prevent the use of property as a source of unearned income; the cities must be broken up into small towns separated by agricultural land; private ownership must become the norm so that eventually rent becomes a thing of the past.  

Sadly, to mention these solutions is to invite accusations of racism and hatred of others.  These solutions are anti-racist and motivated by a love of humanity which will not stay quiet when human suffering is evident, regardless of race and origin.  The Zionists who misrule the UK have created this problem as a stage towards the total eradication of the UK as an identifiable independent country.  Once the ethnic make-up of the country is identical with the rest of the world, it will be nothing but a region of the International Slave State - with a Jewish owning class ruling over a mongrelised mass of producers-consumers with no culture, religion (other than materialism), aspirations, or identity.  For the sake of all humanity in every country, the march of the anti-humans must be stopped.  The Newham issue may not seem that important, but it is a a part of a bigger picture and our only hope is to attack every individual piece of that picture before the ruling classes have the chance to complete it and enslave us all forever.