Wednesday, 9 May 2012

Internet Censorship hits the UK. Bypass it!

In Police State Britain, the courts have ordered ISPs to block access to the Pirate Bay download site.  Virgin media have happily imposed this restriction of freedom, but then as a corporation which makes a fortune from selling Establishment propaganda euphemistically called 'music', it is in their interest to block access to a site which contains a lot of their poison.  However, Pirate Bay is not only home to mediocre and banal music and films, it is also a place to get books and other resources which the powers-that-be do not wish us to be aware of.  At the moment, the Pirate bay can still be accessed at https://tpb.pirateparty.org.uk/ but that is sure to be stopped in due course.

Youtube is also blocking people in the UK from accessing a range of videos.  Just like the government restriction on residents of  Germany finding out the truth about the Holyhoax and the crimes of Israel, the UK censors have created barriers to UK citizens discussing what they deem forbidden.

However, all is not lost.  There are ways around the Internet censors.  If we truly cherish freedom, we must adopt our mode of Internet surfing to get around the Establishment restrictions.  A basic way to dodge the censors is to use VPN tunnels or Usenet.

The following is part of an article by Gary Hough, examining this issue:

Here are the 4, very quick steps I followed to get to the blocked site;
  • 1) Open up a web browser (in this example it is Internet Explorer but this works on all browsers) and attempt to go to www.piratebay.org
Screenshot - Pirate Bay is blocked by Virgin Media
As you can see on my Virgin connection it throws up a blocked error message.
  • 2) So I then open up Google and search for Proxy
Search for "proxy"
As you can see it lists a lot of proxy sites but I select the first one in the listings – Free Proxy
  • 3) I am presented with a web page that asks me to put in the URL of the site I am trying to access, in this example The Pirate Bay.
Enter Pirate Bay URL
I type the address in www.piratebay.org and click the button that says Hide My Ass
  • 4) And bingo, still logged into my Virgin Account but very happily accessing the blocked site The Pirate Bay.
Hey presto it's Pirate Bay
So as you can see it’s as difficult as that and this is probably the easiest way to do it along with many others.

The Government and those calling for ISP’s to block continue to ignore the technical circumvention reality and probably due to ignorance of how the Internet works but the reality is they are putting kids at far greater risk as parents turn away assuming their kids can’t get to blocked sites that have inappropriate or illegal content while little Johnny and Mary are secretly upstairs taking a long hard look as they did things like this example demonstrates.

This issue is really quite a serious one.  Virgin Media are blocking file-sharing sites, but are not blocking Child Abuse Sites (so-called pornography, but really rape).  If Virgin really wanted to do something decent they would go on an all-out offensive against pornography sites, especially those involving minors.  In fact all pornography sites are dangerous insofar as they promote the idea that the sex industry is a valid workplace.  But then, when one considers that Richard Branson promotes homosexuality and promiscuity on his record label and in his advertising, a stance for decency would be somewhat hypocritical.

The Internet is becoming ever-more the focus of the despots who would rule us.  We need to change our habits now and get into the routine of bypassing their restrictions.  Forewarned is forearmed.  The Establishment are preparing to silence us.  Let us make it as difficult as we can for them.

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Greece rejects Austerity and embraces the Natural order

The Bankers' plot to enslave us all is in trouble. In Greece, the 'austerity' measures of the international bankers have led to a resurgence of Greek pride.

In a defiant stand against the international bankers, the Greek population have voted for a collection of parties which reject the fleecing of Greek resources by the Rothschilds, and their fellow banking criminals.

Included in the raft of parties elected to the Greek parliament is the Golden Dawn.  Described by the Zionist media as Ultra-nationalist, far-right, extremist, neo-Fascist etc, Golden dawn stands for a Greek Greece, with priority in work and housing for Greeks.  In our lunatic politically correct world, any support for natural and wholesome patriotism is slandered as extreme.  It is the financiers who are raping Europe and waging war for profit who are extreme.  

The Jewish media have happily ignored the election of Communist parties to the Greek parliament, and instead focused their hatred on the Golden dawn for rejecting their internationalism.  To the Zionist mafia, all enemies are 'far-right', which highlights just how far the drive to materialism has pushed once free Europe.

Bravo to the people of Greece for standing up to the bankers and the traitor politicians who created the financial crisis and now seek to further profit from it by increasing the misery of the people.  If Greece can march on the path to freedom, we all can.  The days of making the people run by shouting 'Fascist!' are coming to an end.  Let us hope that populists such as the BNP who have squirmed to gain the kosher vote and have lost their support base as a result, take note.  No one respects toadying politicians with their fake smiles and insincerity; if they did, the Establishment would be the darlings of the people and not our despised foes.

Link to video of the Golden Dawn's parliamentary success: HERE


Update:

The 'democratic' system in Greece is patently just as absurd as the rest of Zionised Europe.  The failure of the major parties to form a coalition has given the excuse for Greece to re-run the process in a months time.  This is all very much like the fraudulent referenda favoured by Bruxelles.  As the Greeks have given a result that the international cabal does not like, they are to be made to vote again!  Let us hope that the Greeks hold true to their opposition and vote against austerity again.  Will the month before the election be used to dæmonise Golden Dawn and to push for an outright victory for parties who tow the internationalist line?  Was 9/11 a Zionist job?  Do bears defæcate in the woods?

Monday, 7 May 2012

Bank Holiday: Hiding their power in plain sight

Today is a Bank Holiday in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the joined countries of England and Wales.  In addition to the UK, in Ireland also there is the phenomenon of 'Bank Holidays'.  Does anyone ever stop to think what this term means?

Created as a UK Act of Parliament in 1871, Bank Holidays refer to dates in which the Banks are closed, and so as a result days in which the peasants are allowed to take a break from their serfdom.  There are now six Bank Holidays in England and Wales, with two additional ones being added to the original four over time.  Christmas Day and Good Friday are Public Holidays, reflecting the Christian character of Europe, and should not be confused with the Holidays of the Banks, although this is the common misconception, and an error which is officially encouraged.

The Holidays chosen for the Bank holidays were Easter Monday, the Monday after Whit Sunday, St Stephen's Day (Boxing Day) and the first (now last) Monday in August.  The additional holidays were New Year's Day and the first Monday in May (May Day).  A cursory look at the list reveals that three of the original four holidays were linked to Holydays.  The most important of these was Whitsun, which marked the fiftieth day after the Jews murdered Jesus; a day upon which the Apostle Peter preached to a gathering of 3,000 people and thus began the Christian Church.  The Bank Holiday following Whitsun has now become fixed to the last Monday in May, and is called Spring Bank.  By this way, a major Christian festival has become hijacked by the Bankers and its meaning lost.

Taking old religious days, including the May Day celebration of Summer, and turning their emphasis to a day for the Banks is an act of profound arrogance.  By secularising the majority of the officially sanctioned holidays in England and Wales, the Bankers have gained a position of reverence for their days.  The exceptional status of Christmas Day and Good Friday is under attack, as the multi-cultists would love to abolish festivals which are special to the indigenous population, by manipulating them to appear offensive to sections of the immigrant population, especially the Christ-killers of the Banking industry.

Although the 24-hour 7-day society has become a reality over recent years, and many people such as shop worker are forced to work Bank Holidays, the Bankers' days are the focus for millions of Britons for revelry and relaxation.  We have become so accustomed to being wage slaves, that any chance to break free from the yoke is celebrated to the full.  Thus in the secularised UK, the religions of the indigenous folk (Christian and Pagan) are in retreat, whilst festivals of materialism are the focal point of many people's lives.

Just as with the Masonic buildings which stand in every town to shew who rules the UK, the Bank Holidays act as a subconcious reinforcement of where the real power is.  In place of Holydays, we have Bankers' Holidays.  Our enemies like to hide their symbols of power in plain sight.  

I wonder how long it will be before we have Shoah Day as a revered bank Holiday, and Easter abolished?  But then I suppose the ability of 6 million of the Self-Chosen to resurect themselves into rulers of the EU, USA, international finance and Israel, is quite impressive!  Seriously though, this is the direction that the UK is heading in, and that is not good.

Saturday, 5 May 2012

The People of the UK: Not quite the Sheeple we're portayed to be.

On Thursday the 2nd May, England and Wales went to the polls to vote for local government.  Also, there were referenda in ten major cities to decide whether the UK should adopt the American system of directly electing Mayors.  The results of these elections are quite telling.

In the local elections, the usual knee-jerk reaction against the party of government saw losses for the Liberals and Conservatives.  Senior figures in the Conservative Party have now called for the dropping of lunatic policies such as the enforcement of measures to destroy marriage and allow the mentally ill and perverted to marry members of the same sex, presumably followed by legalising sex with donkeys.  Interestingly, the war criminal William Hague has refused to even consider dropping measures to homosexualise the UK, even though this policy is not only hated by the electorate, but by his own party.  Democracy is dead in the UK, and the government don't even bother to pretend otherwise.

The turn-out for the elections was well below 40%.  Two Thirds of the electorate did not vote.  This is refreshing.  Although the son of professional gas chamber escape artists, Ed Miliband, is crowing that the people voted for his Labour Party, the majority of the people are sufficiently awake to know that there is no point in voting, and so have stayed away, effectively giving the fake democratic system a vote of no confidence.  The zionised British National Party's vote also collapsed, proving that aping the Establishment, just doesn't work - which is in itself encouraging.  Perhaps now Mr Griffin will change the BNP's course away from a carbon copy of the old Conservative Party and push ahead with policies which put the people above the State.  (He has recently forged links with the Nationalist Movement in Ireland, which is a much needed step away from petty patriotism into full European Unity. This is a development worth watching, but how it pans out remains to be seen).

In the Mayorall referenda, the results have been a clear rejection of Directly-elected Mayors.  With the exception of Bristol, every city polled has said no to another tier of corrupt self-serving bureaucrats.  This defeat for the government comes in the wake of the defeat of the Proportional Representation Voting System, and Regional Assemblies.  In all three sets of referenda, the people have spoken, and said no to measures which would weaken the country and make it easier for it to be swallowed up by the European Union.  The people have spoken against the building blocks of World Government.  

Considering the abject failure of the Establishment to get the British people to vote as they like, it is no wonder that we are constantly denied referenda on membership of the EU, the Banking Bailout, Immigration, or anything which matters to the people.  No doubt the plan to turn the House of Lords into an elected Senate (rather than simply abolish it!) will be pushed through against the wishes of the people.  The last thing the UK (or any country for that matter) needs, is another level of government which will cost the taxpayer a fortune; but of course the wishes of the Establishment ride roughshod over what is good for the people.

We Britons have been lied to and schemed against for generations, in fact, for centuries.  It is heart-warming to see that the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Celts still stubbornly refuse to obey the Establishment.  Yes, One Third of the electorate voted in the local elections, but Two Thirds didn't, and in the referenda, with the exception of Bristol, the people voted NO, and in the case of Bristol, 3/4 of the people did not vote, thus not giving the position of Mayor a mandate!

The local elections and referenda were great examples of the underlying spirit of the people.  To quote the great GK Chesterton:

Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget,
For we are the people of England, that never has spoken yet.

Friday, 4 May 2012

Water Water Everywhere - But not in the Taps!

Dry ReservoirThe UK is collection of very wet countries.  Situated in the west of Europe, and stretching up into the northwest, the UK is famous for its dreary climate.  The country of Kernow may be relatively dry in comparison with the other countries in the UK, but it is still home to rain, rain and more rain.

It is absolutely ridiculous that the UK should experience hosepipe bans and drought conditions, but for many areas of England, this is the case.  2012 has so far been a year of snow and sleet, interspersed with a brief interlude of summery weather, then back to the usual wind, and yes, rain.  Yet, in the southeast of England, the water companies have imposed hosepipe bans and warnings that despite the continuing deluge, the water system is close to breaking point and there is a very real possibility that at some point it will not be possible to simply turn on a tap and get water.  This is an outrage.

Why is the water system failing?  Is it global warming drying up all the rain before it can be collected in the reservoirs? It is not!  The fake environmentalists would love to blame human greed for the failure of the water supply; for once they are correct.  No it is not the fabled man-made climate change which is to blame, but it is human greed which has caused the drought. 

The current situation in the southeast of England is very similar to the drought which hit Yorkshire in the 1990s.  The Pennine county of Yorkshire, along with its neighbour to the west, forms the wettest in all of England, yet in 1994, the county played host to convoys of water tankers topping up the reservoirs.  In the area close to the border with Lancashire, the water level in Scammonden Reservoir was so low that the old flooded village at the base of the valley was exposed.  1994 had a hot summer, but just like the new drought which has stretched from the southeast of England into the southern frontiers of Yorkshire, the weather had nothing to do with the water shortage.

Although Yorkshire is a land with many reservoirs of its own, it is serviced by the Kielder Reservoir in Northumbria.  In the 1990s , the company who own Kielder, sold the water to France, and exported so much water that the supply for Yorkshire was decimated.  Profiteering and greed were the sole cause of the 1994 drought in the wettest part of one of the wettest countries in western Europe.

So, could greed be a factor in the current drought in England?  With floods across the southwest, and the tragic death by drowning of a motorist due to the excessive rainfall, it would appear that the drought is not a natural event.  Just as with the 1994 episode, the current drought is due to reservoirs being emptied of water.  Unbelievably the international corporations responsible for the loss of water have gone further than their counterparts in the north of England, and have sold reservoirs which have then be filled in and built over with new housing developments.  Yes, in the fantasy world of the international capitalist, the water supply is doubly reduced by first selling off some of the already over-stretched reservoirs, and then building more housing on them to further increase demand for water!  This is so insane that it is hard to believe it is true - but true it is.  Not only have reservoirs been sold, but more are due to be sold.

In the 1980s the Thatcher regime sold the utilities and infrastructure of the UK.  Arguing that it was not the job of the government to run utility companies, and that they would be more efficient under private control, the bonanza of privatisation was carried out.  The constant rise in prices of the previously socialised utilities, have enriched the internationalist owners, but have not benefited the people one iota.  Not only has privatisation led to higher prices, but also to worse services.  This man-made drought is proof of the folly of selling the national infrastructure to rootless cosmopolitans who have no allegiance to people or country, and only see the financial profit to be made from raping the nation.

There is only one solution to the water problem.  That solution is to stop regarding the treatment and supply of water as something which can be left to the international market.  Water is an essential utility, and the fact that its control is a means to enrich multi-nationals is nothing less than scandalous.  People can do without electricity, but they cannot do without clean water.  More than any other utility, it is vital that the water industry is returned to ownership by indigenous Britons, and is provided at a cost which is self-sustaining, and does not result in profit.  Of course, any additional services beyond the supply of water and the maintenance of the system could reasonably be undertaken with an eye to making a reasonable profit, but the essentials must be regarded as life essentials, which is what they are.  What we need to save our water system is, in a word, nationalisation.

Nationalisation has become a dirty word due to its association with top-heavy bureaucracy and its inherent inefficiency through bad management and strike-happy workers.  This was certainly the case in the socialised control of the UK's infrastructure, but real nationalisation doesn't have to be that way.

Following the tragedy of the Second Great Intra-European War for Zion (WW2), the internationalist regime in London seized control of the economy by legally confiscating swathes of privately owned businesses, which were transferred into 'public ownership'.  What is considered in the UK as Nationalisation, is in reality the Socialisation of the means of production and transport infrastructure.

The Socialised companies in the UK were deliberately mismanaged to create the impression that only by putting them back into private control could they be efficient and provide a good and cost-effective service.  Those who live in the UK and experience the insane prices charged by the previously state owned industries can testify that privatisation in the UK is actually less efficient than State control, and a damned sight more expensive.  

Under the premiership of the hated Margaret Thatcher, (the shrew and war criminal who destroyed the Mining Industry and turned the UK from a nation of industry into one of service and servility), the previously socialised industries and infrastructure were 'privatised'.  This economic sleight of hand oversaw the transfer of indigenous-owned companies into State control, then into the hands of rootless speculators.  If the period of Socialisation could be labelled as Nationalisation, then its reversal was not so much Privatisation as Internationalisation.

In the UK, indigenous owned companies were stolen by the State, then given at ridiculously low costs to the international corporations who funded the government.  In the case of the Water Authorities, these became the Water Companies.  Before being internationalised, the Water Authorities employed men to keep the channels to the reservoirs free from blockages, thus allowing water from the hills to run into the collection centres.  After the Thatcher sell-off, the number of men employed was drastically cut, forcing unemployment levels up, and beginning the demise of our water system as the gulleys began to silt up.  We can thank Thatcher for the origins of the droughts of 1994 and 2012.

The terms used by economists are misleading.  State control is Socialisation, not Nationalisation; Stock Market corporate control is Internationalisation, not Privatisation.  The legal prohibition of foreign ownership, and the break up of larger corporations to ensure the maximum practicable level of private individual control, goes by the awkward label of Distributism - although Nationalisation would be more appropriate.  It is perhaps to distract the people from the real workable alternative to Internationalisation and Socialisation, that the economic labels are muddled.  By deception our enemies do war.

If we are ever to regain our lands, we need to stop playing the left-right game.  Yes, Nationalisation conjures up images of Communism, just as Nationalism is seen as somehow Capitalistic.  These labels have been used to divide us, but that is only because we allow ourselves to be divided.

The water industry must be Nationalised - that is, control must be taken from the international parasites who use our utilities for profit, and put into the hands of indigenous folk who are constrained by law to provide a constant clean water supply at a reasonable price, maybe even free.  Should they also provide services which are solely to generate income, then so be it - so long as the essential services are provided on a not-for-profit basis.

Those who oppose the international materialistic order and its destruction of culture and race, will be called 'Fascists'.  Does it matter?  Those who propose Nationalisation (but not in the Marxian form which is really Socialisation) will be attacked as enemies of free trade and capitalism, and possibly be called 'Reds'.  Again, does it matter? 

A country which relies on other countries for its basic resources, is doomed.  Multi-national corporations exist as countries in all but name.  The solution to the water shortages in the UK is to deal with the real causes - over-population and materialism.  The first problem can be solved by returning the surplus population to the countries from which they came (and encouraging all those who wish to live in a multi-culti country to depart our shores for a new life in any country which will tolerate their liberal insanity); the second problem can be solved by making the economy of the country serve the people, and not international criminals.

The solution to Internationalism is Nationalism.  Nationalism is not hatred of others but love of one's own.  The prerequisite of a national rebirth is full national economic control of everything produced in the country.  This does not mean State control, which is but a stepping stone to internationalisation, but absolute popular control, with private ownership of everything backed by a legal system which ensures that no trans-nationals can own (or profit by control of) anything in the country.  Holding on to ideological definitions created to divide us, is not an option.  We need to call for full Nationalisation (aka National Distributism) now - and understand what that term really means.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Nation-wrecking BBC lauds mentally-ill 78 year old 'sex changer'

Just when you thought the BBC couldn't get any more embarrassingly politicised, it drops to previously unimaginable depths.  On the BBC Radio 5 Victoria Derbyshire programme, a 78 year old man with mental health issues was allowed to humiliate his family by professing to be a woman trapped inside a man's body.  

During the nauseating spectacle (which you can listen to here), James Rose was given air time to describe how he has studied the differences between men and women, and has now come to the conclusion that he is in fact a woman, and so, even though he is 78 years old, he is going to be sexually mutilated to remove his penis.

The Father of three, and Grandfather of four, spoke in a typically deep male voice about his fantasies of being female, and rather than suggest the aged gentleman seek help from psychiatric professionals, the politically correct interviewer, Derbyshire, insisted throughout the programme in calling him Ruth.  She even went so far as to berate a listener for referring to James as a man, which is of course what he is.

The notion that gender is a social construct is pure liberal nonsense.  It fits in with the idea that we are all the same under the skin and that visible physiological differences are of no importance.  This is itself really quite offensive as it belittles the innate qualities of men and women, and of the diverse nations of humanity.  

To the liberal-materialist mind, people are basically the same, with no outstanding characteristics, and nothing of merit to distinguish them from the other producing-consuming featherless bipeds who roam the Earth.  As we are all the same, our focus can only be on acquisition of material goods and physical survival, as, (so the materialists would have it), culture, race, spirituality, tradition, gender, intellect, etc are all social constructs which exist to oppress us, and we will all be better off when these things are gone and we can all be self-obsessed hedonists devoid of the real essence of humanity.  This bleak view is the liberal utopia.  Thank you, but no thanks.

James Rose is set to have his penis removed next year when he will be 80 years old.  Up until now his disorder has been limited to cross-dressing.  Mr Rose spoke of how his children are unhappy about him sliding into a world of self-absorption in which his foibles have become so important to him that he is unable to consider the feelings of his children.  He is not allowed to see his grandchildren due to his children taking the necessary, but doubtless heart-rending step, of keeping him away from them for their own protection.  For a man to wilfully separate himself from his own flesh and blood due to a fetish, is proof that the poor man needs help, not molly-coddling and encouragement.

Mr Rose spoke at length about how he studies the way women hold their heads, walk, talk etc, and tries to emulate them.  If he really was a woman, he wouldn't have to study feminine characteristics, as he would already have them.  The fact that he can identify the distinguishing traits which differentiate men from women gives proof to the innate existence of theses differences.  His own studies prove that he is a man.  He may be a man who likes to play at dressing up, and more than likely gets sexual pleasure from his transvestism, but he is a man nonetheless.

There have always been transvestites.  There have always been homosexuals.  There have always been pædophiles.  In the case of fetishists, be it those who like to dress up in rubber, latex, clothes of the opposite sex, bondage, or whatever, so long as their kinkiness remains in the bedroom and remains between consenting adults of the opposite sex, it doesn't harm anyone.  Many men like women to wear high heels as it alters the shape of the calf muscle.  Many women find uniforms arousing due to their association with masculine and brave men such as firemen.  These could be called fetishes of sorts, but they are harmless.  Homosexuality and pædophilia are harmful to everyone involved, and in the case of Mr Rose, his particular quirk has crossed from the realm of the peculiar into that which is dangerous. 

Why are there now more sexual deviants than ever before?  We ingest hormones in our food from livestock which has been subjected to growth altering drugs.  Our water supplies have been contaminated with hormones from the contraceptive pill.  The mass use of airborne chemicals in industry, and of pharmaceuticals, all have impacted upon our physical and mental health.  The changes we see in puberty, with girls starting their periods at ever younger ages, are not natural, but a result of irresponsible industrial practices which have contaminated the very air we breath and the food we eat with toxins which are detrimental to our health.  The increase in illness produced by the modern era of selfish and uncaring multi-nationals conglomerates does not only manifest in cancers, heart disease etc, but also in mental illness such as that suffered by men who think they are women.

The BBC programme was typical of what one would expect from the State broadcaster.  The British Establishment is a central part of the international cabal which seeks the destruction of difference, in order to create a uniform world of mindless materialists.  For such people, men and women are the same, and it is therefore merely an enhanced form of cosmetic surgery to change the physical appearance of one into the other.

un-necessary surgery does not help.

In a sane world, there would be laws forbidding the contamination of the food chain by pharmaceutical corporations; health care would be focused upon treating illnesses, not masking symptoms with drugs; those responsible for industrial pollution such as the BP atrocity in the Gulf of Mexico would be dealt with in the harshest possible ways (rather than covering-up their crimes, and even as in the case of BP, orchestrating the invasion of Libya to replace BP's lost profits); mental and physical health would be considered as a whole and not used for political purposes; men such as Mr Rose would be helped back to normality rather than condemned to travel further into insanity.

I feel sorry for Mr Rose, and especially for his family.  He has been used by the BBC as a poster boy for the Establishment's attack on the natural society.  If he survives the operation, he will have the physical appearance of a woman (a very tall woman with big hands!), but he will still be a man, and no amount of surgery or media propaganda will change that.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Is the War of Terror targeting Pakistan?

The Zionist wars of aggression being played out around the globe are a danger to us all.  The latest propaganda by the Jewish President of the USA, Barry 'Obama' Dunham seeks to dæmonise Pakistan and to stir up separatism in Balochistan. Whereas the imperialist wars have so far focused on countries with relatively few emigrants to Europe and the USA, any attack against Pakistan would be of a wholly different nature.

In Europe, the Pakistani population is massive.  In England, there are over one million Pakistanis; the vast majority of whom live in self-contained colonies in the Pennine spine of England, and in the cities from the Midlands down to Luton.  These colonies are residence to many Pakistanis who have not even bothered to learn English, due to a complete lack of identification with any country outside the Muslim world.  

The global war, which should be called the Third World War due to the number of fronts and countries being attacked by the Zionist Axis, has killed more people than the number of Jews alleged to have been killed by Hitler.  Unlike the Shoah færy tale with its mythical gas chambers, lampshades and soap, the holocaust of Libyans, Iraqis, Afghans, Somalis, Serbians, etc etc is real.  The true figure of Jewish deaths in the Second World War (from all causes, mostly natural or US/UK inflicted, but excluding those fighting in the Wehrmacht), was fewer than those murdered by Bomber Harris' terrorist RAF raids on Dresden.  The Muslim world is more aware of this reality than the cowed and zionised nations of Europe and the west.

Muslims have been dæmonised by the media since 2001 when they were blamed for the MOSSAD-CIA-MI6 massacre at the World Trade Centre.  They were blamed for the follow-up atrocities, organised by the same forces, in Madrid and Bali.  The phantom Al Qaeda Network of Wahhabi terrorists has been used to create the image of evil Muslims out to 'get' the West.  The fact that Wahhabism is a sect created by Talmudists, and has about as much in common with Islam as Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientologists and Mormons have with Christianity, is never discussed by the mainstream media, and of course the creation of Al Qaeda as a front for US military operations against the USSR, although exposed in Adam Curtis' BBC documentary, 'the Power of Nightmares', is conveniently forgotten.  Interestingly, the Curtis series also exposed Operation Gladio in which Europeans were murdered by the secret police in terrorist attacks, and Nationalists such as Roberto Fiore were blamed.

Links to Power of Nightmares Video:
Part 1 - http://youtu.be/xGo1DqmfHjY

Part 2 - http://youtu.be/o0kNNqZk3mg

Part 3 - http://youtu.be/qATc5jRbVOA


The global cabal are consummate chess players.  They plan every move with absolute precision, and are more than happy to play the long game.  Their patience is astounding, as is their methodology.  The scapegoating of Muslims for Zionist atrocities has created an atmosphere of mistrust amongst non-Muslims, and feelings of wrongful persecution amongst Muslims themselves.  In the UK, Zionist fronts such as the English Defence League were created by the Establishment to stir up hatred between the Muslim colonists and the host population.  As we can now see with the Breivik case, the murder of civilians solely justified as an act of war against Islam, is being used to further polarise opinion and create deeper hostility between the indigenous population and the non-adaptive newcomers.

Why are there millions of Pakistanis in Europe?   Around 10% of Oslo is of Pakistani origin, and in the district of the town where I live, the figure is probably closer to 90%.  Mass immigration was orchestrated to drive down salaries, raise unemployment, and generally take power away from the working man and give it to unscrupulous multi-nationals.  Trades Unions have supported immigration, knowing full-well that rapid increases in population are detrimental to working conditions - regardless of the ethnic origin of the newcomers - but then, the Trades Unions of today are politically-motivated, and the well-being of the worker is of far less importance to the Union leaders than political ideology of their internationalist masters.

Immigration has broken the link of people to land, with swathes of Europe becoming alien-occupied territory, complete with self contained economies, and cultural and spiritual facilities.  The drive to a single mongrelised world ruled over by the self-Chosen who remain ethnically aloof in their fortress country is certainly a part of the reason for mass immigration.  With Pakistanis, the tendency to marry within the race is particularly strong, even if miscegenation with European girls is a growing phenomenon.  Just as Jews see sex with shiksas as practice before settling down to marry within the race, so Pakistani males may have sex with 'cultural-less infidel white slags', but they will not marry them.  

Some Europeans have converted to Islam, but the media and education system-damaged girls who drink to excess, take hard drugs, are covered in tattoos which they display from their overly exposed flesh, have sex to be popular and not appear 'racist', tend to be used and abused and not considered of sufficient quality for marriage - which is understandable. Such girls do dilute the gene-pool of the indigenous population, but their behaviour leaves the Pakistani colonies intact, which doesn't serve the global agenda insofar as mongrelisation of all the Goy races is concerned.

Perhaps the sabre-rattling against Pakistan indicates the main reason for the invitation by the Zionist Establishment of millions of Pakistanis into the European homeland.  The Establishment want war against Pakistan to become war inside Europe between Europeans and Pakistanis.  The majority of Pakistanis, just like everyone else, want to live peacefully and go about their business un-molested.  The propaganda that all Muslims are eager to become martyrs for Islam is just that, propaganda.  Certainly there are Muslims who would happily blow themselves up for the cause (and having worked alongside such people, the fanaticism is quite alarming), but by and large, most Muslims regard death as something to welcome when it arrives, but they are in no hurry to get there quickly.  This raises the serious question as to how the Establishment would deal with those who do not fit the propaganda stereotype.

Would the Establishment be willing to bomb cities in the West using their paid fanatics in their Al Qaeda units?  Of course they would.  Would they be willing to carry out false flag operations and blame the Pakistanis for them?  New York 11/9/1, Madrid 11/3/4 and London 7/7/5 answer that question.  Would a war against Pakistan be used to fuel unrest in Europe as an excuse to bring in the Police State complete with concentration camps?  I wouldn't doubt it for a moment.

In Pakistan, there is a growing feeling that war is coming.  The implications for Europe are worrying.  Whether Pakistanis will commit terrorist acts against Europe is open to debate, but if one puts oneself in the shoes of an immigrant whose family is being killed by the forces of the host country, then the probability of some form of violent resistance does become more likely.

If war comes, we may see the bizarre spectacle of European patriots supporting a war of aggression against Pakistan as a reaction to the propaganda of the Zionists leading us into war.  The Establishment have created Breivik and groups such as the EDL to form a solid support base for their wars.  Europeans will die as a result of the coming war.  Pakistanis will die in their own country, provoking anger in the colonies, which may spill over into bloodshed in our homeland.  The Zionists who will gain from this will be safe in their well-guarded communities. 

The time to stop a war is before it starts.  To secure Europe, we must throw off the Zionist vermin which treat us as unthinking cattle.  We must demand a halt to all immigration and a return to their homelands of all non-Europeans.  For the safety of the indigenous population, and the colonists, the colonies must be removed.  The cost of war is far higher economically than would be the cost of relocating the colonists to their homelands, and providing them with financial support which would benefit their homelands as well as themselves.  The human cost of any war which serves Zion and the International Order is unacceptable.  It is of paramount importance that the Axis of Evil is stopped, and the control of Europe worldwide is returned to Europeans. 

We now face a situation in which the Muslims in Europe will be fighting for what is right, and the indigenous population will be coerced into supporting evil.  We do not have to become pawns for the internationalists.  We can take a third position which doesn't support Islam or the Internationale; we can stand up for Europe and every country in the world by demanding the disbanding of NATO, the EU, IMF, World Bank, UN etc and the breaking up of the multi-national corporations which are directing the international agenda.  We can refuse to play along with the 'blame the muzzies' game, and seek a just and honourable return of all people to their own countries, including Europeans outside the European world.  A world, of free and ethnically homogeneous countries is the solution to internationalism and all expressions of supremacism.  Stopping the use of our military to destroy those who resist the One Worlders is the first step.

For a take on the situation from inside Pakistan, see the following:
(Direct link - http://www.youtube.com/embed/qkqfeZFUahc)


Trouble is brewing, and it is the usual suspects who are behind it.  In the short term, we may have to temporarily ally ourselves with the Muslim colonists in order to stop the more dangerous Zionist menace; but ultimately we must achieve independence from all occupation, Jewish, Muslim, or whatever.  It is the traitors in Westminster, Bruxelles and Washington who have engineered this tragedy, and it is they who must be dealt with.  Fighting one another is what they want.  This we cannot afford to do.