Syria and the Lebanon: Targets of Turko-Israeli expansion

When one thinks of Zionism, one automatically thinks of Israel.  Zion is an alternative name for Jerusalem, and so it is only natural to focus upon the regime which controls the physical territory of Jerusalem; natural, but overly simplistic.

There is more than one Zionist state.  Israel is a focal point for Zionism by virtue of its population sharing the same genetic stream as the Elders of Zion.  However, the nearby countries of Saudi Arabia and Turkey are also a part of the Zionist nexus.

The Lebanon has long been a target of Zionist expansion.  The current eruption of violence within the borders of the Lebanon is a part of the long term destabilisation of the country.  The long-term objective is, as Binyamin Netanyahu stated, to wipe the Lebanon off the map.  Isn't it interesting that Bibi can openly state his desire to annihilate an entire country (whilst systematically occupying every inch of another) and no one says a word?  Yet if anyone dares to state that the occupants of ersatz Israel should move back to Khazaria or on to Birobidjan, then accusations of anti-Semitism abound, and dawn raids by the gboys in blue are sure to follow.

The Lebanon and Syria form a united bloc in defence against Zionist imperialism.  The onslaught on Syria by NATO and its Al Qaeda terrorists is an attempt to knock out a country which has stood defiantly against Israeli aggression for decades.  The Israeli imperialists were driven out of the Lebanon by Syrian might, in their only unsuccessful war of conquest.  The Zionists have never forgotten the bloody nose meted out by Syria.  Israel still occupies the Golan Heights, and even includes the Syrian territory on its tourist maps of Israel.  The long term objective is for all of Syria and the Lebanon to be incorporated into Israel.  Presumably, the population of those two countries will be subjected to the ethnic cleansing and degradation which is all too familiar to the people of Palestine.  Sycophantic Zionists refer to Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East, and the only country which desires peace.  This is beyond chutzpah.  The only 'peace' Israel desires, is a 'piece' of Iraq, a 'piece' of Egypt, and very large 'pieces' of its other neighbours.

According to the fantasists in Israel, and their Judæo-Christian followers, the Jews are a 'special' people chosen by God to rule over humanity, and they have been promised a huge swathe of land which includes all of Palestine, the Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and parts of Iraq et al.  This territory extends to include the land to the west of the middle east in Europe and Africa.  If anyone else had fantasies about an invisible man promising them ownership of the world, they would be medicated and put in a special hospitable with padded walls to bounce off.  For reasons which escape any rational explanation, when such lunacy is expressed by people who call themselves Jews (in spite of being Turkic in origin and in no way connected to the ancient Hebrews), it is looked upon as righteous wisdom.  The utterances of the Zionists and their Talmudic controllers are the words of people who are dangerously deluded; these psychopaths should be isolated from the rest of humanity, but instead, by virtue of exploiting the greed and selfishness of the rest of us, they run the world!  This is beyond scary.

In addition to Israel, the Zionists control Saudi Arabia and Turkey.  They have their people in power in the USA and EU (including the UK), but the real Zionist states remain the aforementioned three in Asia Minor.  It is all too easy to mock the befuddled kosher ones, but sadly they have real power, and as the people of Syria and the Lebanon fully appreciate, they are more than willing to use it.  

Syria, so claim the raving racists of Zion, belongs to the Jews because the Big Invisible Jew in the Sky says it does.  The Zionist land of Turkey, which was carved out of the Ottoman Empire by the homosexual Jew, Kemal Ataturk, is eager to expand into Iraq and northern Syria, where it will dovetail with Israel expanding northwards.  Purely by coincidence - (of course) - the land coveted by Turkey reaches to the exact frontier of the promised land of Israel.  Syria as well as the Lebanon, are ear-marked for eradication.  To the east of Israel, the third Zionist State, Saudi Arabia is eagerly gobbling up all the smaller countries in the Arabian Peninsula, and by so doing creating an eastern border which mirrors the Talmudic fantasy.

Surely of course, none of this can come to pass?  Well, with a Jew as President of the USA, the military support for such an operation is in place.  Because Barack Obama is tanned, he has been described as an African-American.  According to the Jewish Law of Return, it doesn't matter what one's father is, it is only the gene pool of the mother which counts.  Does anyone call the Rothschild banking family White Europeans by virtue of their skin colour?  No, they are clearly identified as Jews.  Obama may have a darker pigmentation than the likes of George Soros (who incidentally has yet again profitted from insider trading,), Larry Silverstein, Rupert Murdoch, David Cameron, François Hollande, Ed Milliband etc etc ad nauseum, but he is of the same tribe.  Obama is no more Black, than the above mentioned are White; he, like the rest of them, is a Jew.

Syria will be destroyed unless the cowering Goyim stand up and stop the aggressive and terrorist war being waged by the USA, NATO and their collaborators.  If Syria falls, then the so-called Promised Land will become a geographical reality.  Pandering to lunatics by giving them what the voices in their heads tell them they should have, only reinforces their delusions and encourages them to become even more detached from reality.  

If the geographical 'completion' of Israel comes to pass, then the next logical step is for the rule of Zion over the rest of humanity, with the Israeli superstate as the hub of the New Global Jewish Empire.  In that New World Order, non-Jews will be slaves.  Even if one does not support Assad ideologically, he is an ally against our own enslavement.  For the sake of humanity, the Zionist trinity and its global support network must be overthrown.

Standing by Syria is not a matter of supporting Assad, but of opposing the 'New World Order'.  In this case, our enemies enemy IS our friend.  All who treasure freedom for themselves must appreciate that the only guarantee for our freedom is for the freedom of every nation to be protected.  In the case of the nations in the Middle East, it is vital that the parasite state of Israel is disbanded, and the Israeli population relocated to the Real Jewish State, Birobidjan.  There they can indulge in their mumbo jumbo until the end of time, or until their lunatic ideology leads to their own demise (through natural and strictly internal means).  In a free world, even Judaism has its place - but in complete isolation from any other nation or culture so that its poison can only harm those who cling to it.  Maybe in a free world, in time the Jews could abandon their insane beliefs and become good neighbours to humanity?  That, of course, remains to be seen.

Jews are Special - Jews are Chosen. (Fetch the sick bucket)

I have been accused of being obsessed with the Jewish question.  It seems I am not alone.  I have been accused of spreading falsehoods about the disproportionate power of the Jews, yet in the following video, a JEW states exactly what I, and others, have written and said.  Is he an anti-Semite?  Or is it only when the Goyim tell the truth about the Jews that it is a crime?  If the words spoken by this gloating Jew were spoken at a non-Jewish gathering, the Thought Police would soon be kicking down the doors and breaking skulls.  But then, the only Police likely to be at the meeting of the self-congratulatory supremacist bigot in the video, would have been the ones dispatched to ensure his right to spew his supremacist nonsense.  Free Speech is the reserve of the self-Chosen, who in our Orwellian dystopia are truly more equal than others...

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/LtRucAPc1AE

Greek demonstrators attack the heart of the beast

As Bankia struggles to keep the Spanish people from withdrawing their money from the part-nationalised bank, the people of Greece have taken a more direct approach to shewing their lack of support for the usurers who have destroyed their economy.  Rather than just emptying the vaults of the fiat currency, Greek demonstrators have emptied the streets of the banks themselves!

Direct Link to video: http://youtu.be/oIVdnKc1BDI

Bravo to the people of Greece for attacking the real enemy. It is noteworthy that the so-called Black Bloc Anarchists (undercover police agents provocateur) attack private businesses but never the usurers.  Whilst I couldn't possibly advocate the physical destruction of the temples of Mammon, I cannot but smile at the rightful assault against the real enemy.  Kudos to the genuine spirit of European Resistance.

Open Reply to those who hate Ratko Mladić: an appeal to a sane understanding of national identity

I recently wrote an article explaining why the trial of Ratko Mladić was an act of despotism, and how the Srebrenica Massacre did not really happen.  In response, I received the following comment from an anonymous reader:

Dear Rufus,

You owe me 5 minutes of my irreplaceable and precious life. The time I spent reading the utterly delusional garbage that you have written.

I thought “what the hell, let’s hear out what a Rat-lover has to say”. But, you have nothing to say. Nothing to reveal, other than your fantasies, paranoia and self-deception. Just like the Nazis. They were always the wronged, the persecuted, and there was no difference between truth and non-truth. The way you speak of swapping whole communities for your imagined “ethnically-pure” Serb paradise gives the game away, but you are too ignorant to fathom the stomach-churning nature of what you say.

Please present yourself to the nearest psychiatric asylum, or better still, to the nearest zoo, as an exhibit of a quasi-human monster, spewing venom with each breath. You and your kind belong behind thick bars and long walls, just like your “heroes” Rat Mladic, Milosevic, Karadzik, Hitler, ...

OK, anonymous.  You have read the article, and you still believe that Ratko Mladić is the devil himself.  Presented with copious links to prove that the Srebrenica Massacre was a media circus, and that the images of corpses were in fact those of soldiers killed in the fighting between the different sides in the Bosnian conflict, you still believe the official kosher stories of the media.  You probably believe that Osama Bin Laden directed the destruction of the World Trade Centre using hijacked æroplanes, and you probably believe that the 6 million Jews who emigrated into the USA and Israel (and other places) did so after being gassed to death and resurrected (in some instances having been gassed to death several times, according to their testimony in the Nürnberg Trials).  It is your right to believe what you like, and if the evidence disputes your view of the world, you are entitled to ignore it.

I wonder, anonymous, are you a fan of the international Slave State being built for all of us?

If you are, then you will naturally love the idea of multi-culturalism, and Materialism as God.  If you aren't, then you will appreciate that the only defence against internationalism is national sovereignty.  In no place in the article did I gloat over the deaths of the Muslims in Yugoslavia.  If you read the article with an open mind, you would have noticed that I applauded the proposed relocation of Serbs into their heartland in exchange for Muslims into central Bosnia.  If this relocation had been allowed, many more people (Serb and Muslim) would have survived the war.  The refusal to allow the population transfers caused more misery than it would have averted. 

You say that you find the idea of an ethnically-pure Serbia stomach churning?  Why exactly is this?  What is wrong with a nation living together in its own land where it can grow naturally?  What is wrong with eliminating ethnic hatred before it has the chance to take root? Why do you believe that people must be forced to share territory with people with whom they have nothing in common?

I oppose internationalism and imperialism.  In reality, they are one and the same thing.  Internationalism envisions a single global authority, with all people being 'citizens of the world'.  It sounds quite a nice idea, until one realises that in order to achieve this cuddly cosy global system, all manifestations of difference must be obliterated.  There is another word for multi-culturalism and internationalism; that word is Genocide.

The one-worlders do not wish to create single global governance out of love of the people.  Rather they seek to reduce the people to identity-less producer-consumers who they can more easily exploit - they want to create a global plantation, and you, as much as I, will be nothing but a slave.  It may surprise you to know that I have friends of all cultures and ethnicities.  I enjoy deep discussions with people from other cultures and faiths.  If the one worlders have their way, there will be no such discussions, as there will be no Arabs, Africans, Latin Americans, Orientals etc; there will be no Islam, Christianity, Hinduism. 

For all its ill, in its own territorial space, if it can be kept away from attempts to put into practice its supremacist fantasies, even Judaism has a right to exist unmolested.  The dominance of Talmudism in the drive to an international order does not mean that opposition to internationalism goes hand-in-glove with a desire to exterminate the Jews!  Rather, opposition to internationalism means an opposition to the dominance of anyone over anyone else.  In order for this to be achieved, the integrity of all nations must be protected

Internationalism is the imperialism of finance.  The lies against Ratko Mladić are a part of the agenda for the abolition of Nations, Cultures, Religions, Tradition, and everything which makes us human.  People who love their kin are slandered as 'haters' who seek to exterminate everyone else.  The exact opposite is the case.  Those who love their own - really love their own - understand the characteristics which make a nation a thing of beauty.  When one fully appreciates that in one's own people, one begins to appreciate the qualities inherent in other peoples.  Not wishing for ones own kind to be lost in a mass of indistinguishable drones is only a part of the struggle against internationalism; the protection of every ethnicity and culture is the other part.  

As I have said, I enjoy meeting with peoples of diverse origins.  In a free world, human contact will become more fulfilling as we can meet other people as we travel to visit their homelands.  I like my friends, but I do not wish them to live in my house or to have sex with my wife!  My friends enjoy my company, and when it is time for me to return home, I do not think for a moment that they wish me harm.  Guests are welcome when one knows that they are only visiting; when they become squatters, and demand that the host turns himself into a servant to their every need (and pays for the privilege), then there are problems.

Your paragraph advising me to go to a Zoo for observation is very amusing.  However, aren't you worried that this will allow me a Platform to speak my anti-international heresy?  Or will you screen anyone who visits the Zoo for anti-internationalist traits?  Perhaps all you capture could then be re-educated, and should that fail, be shot like the filthy Kulaks we are?

You list my heroes, but obviously, this is a knee-jerk reaction.  If you click on the label, 'Hitler', you will find an opinion which is somewhat less than hero worship.  Hitler's anti-Slavic policies and his imperialistic expansion into Russia are as unacceptable as the Zionist drive to eliminate the distinct peoples of the world.  If you can bring yourself to spend another 5 minutes reading this blog, you may find the material on Hitler interesting.

It is comical that the commentator who responded to my article seems to believe that thoughts such as mine should be censored.  I believe in absolute freedom of speech, which is far more than those who have consumed the toxins of multi-culturalism and political correctness do. 

I appreciate all feedback, and I do try to respond, but I don't always get the opportunity.  If you wish to debate this (or any other) issue further, please join the Forum.  That goes for everyone.  If, anonymous, you sincerely believe I must be medicated so that I can enjoy your rosy view of the coming New World Order, then perhaps you need to look at what you are ingesting, and try seeing the world as it is; warts and all.

Oh, and if you are wondering why the image of the Swiss Flag at the top of the article, this is because the multi-cultists wish to abolish it as it 'offends' the new-comers to Switzerland.  Now the unwelcome over-staying guests want the Swiss to tend to their every need and to change the emblem of their country.  Wouldn't relocating these malcontents now be preferable to the destruction of Switzerland?  Or does the mind that loves to hate all defence of individual nations, and believes the ridiculous lies against Ratko Mladić, find it unacceptable that anyone question the destructive march of internationalism?

BBC: Trotskyite propaganda machine

BBC Radio 5 is the perfect tonic for people suffering with low blood pressure, but doesn't aid the health of the British people as a whole.  On the Nicky Campbell programme this morning, the national deficit was discussed in the light of the election of President Hollande in France.  As if the people of the UK are not aware of just how biased the BBC is, one of the invited guests on the programme was none other than an official of the Socialist Workers Party.

The Trotskyite SWP officer, of course, blamed 'the rich' for all the ills of society, but failed to mention that the parasitic rich who are destroying our country, are not members of the indigenous population.  The Bankers were ignored, and instead tax-dodging multi-nationals were blamed for all our woes.  The whole crux of the SWP argument was for increased taxation at the highest earning level.  As one has come to expect of the BBC, the SWP viewpoint was given vast amounts of airtime, but the real solutions to capitalism were not even addressed.

A listener rang in to point out that the SWP are Trotskyite and that their ideology is responsible for over 100 million deaths in the last century alone.  When a second caller rang in with the same point, Nicky Campbell laughed off the deaths of a staggering number of people, and stated that the debate was about austerity, and not the minutiæ of Trotskyism!

Imagine for one moment that a caller rang into the BBC to discuss the fact that the Banking cabal is Jewish, and that the solution to Capitalism is the abolition of the monetary system which sees money borrowed into existence as debt owed to the international bankers, rather than created as credit by the State, and - which is most important - to remove usury and all Judaic economics from our country?  The BBC would shriek hysterically that correctly identifying the monetary problem and its solution was 'racist', 'anti-Semitic' and 'right-wing extremist'.  The caller would be blocked from accessing airtime, and would most certainly not be invited to contribute in the role of an expert on economics (which is what the SWP member was referred to as this morning).  The No Platform policy of the BBC would probably be extended to reporting the caller for thought crimes and having him or her arrested by the politicised police for incitement to racial/religious hatred!

The BBC routinely describes anyone who doesn't agree with its Trotskyite ideology as a far right extremist, neo-Nazi or some similar label.  The BBC is the official State Broadcaster and an extension of the Establishment.  The Nicky Campbell programme was a typical example of reporting under government restrictions.  As if allowing the SWP free rein was not biased enough, another caller rang in to state that the economic problems stemmed from the debts incurred in the Second World War, and that we all had a duty to pay our share as gratitude for the fact that we are not all speaking German!  The caller was not indigenous, thus had we not fought the suicidal war, he would not be in this country in the first place to dictate to the indigenous population about how grateful we should be for the destruction of our culture in the Crusade to create Israel! The idea that we would be speaking German is ludicrous, and in any case Anglo-Saxons are Germans!

I think I will have to cut down my exposure to the BBC, unless I become diagnosed with hypotension, in which case I know that by tuning in to hear the political rantings of the Talmudic materialists, my blood pressure is guaranteed to soar.

Ratko Mladić. Serbian Hero & Victim of NATO lies.

Ratko Mladić, the heroic defender of Serbia is on trial in the Hague, for the genocide of Muslims in Srebrenica, Republika Srpska.  Ratko Mladić is not guilty of genocide; he is guilty of being a loyal Serbian who fought for his country against the international terrorists of NATO, and their paid mercenaries the former federal state of Yugoslavia.

The Srebrenica Massacre is a lie.  Ratko Mladić is being prosecuted for an event which did not happen.  Just as with the great Serbian patriot, Slobodan Milošević, who was murdered by the US military before he could expose the lies of the US government, it is highly likely that anyone who comes forward to defend Mladić will be slain by the butchers of the US-UK-NATO Axis of Evil.

The trial of Ratko Mladić is being compared to the Nürnberg Trials of the defeated Germans after 1945.  This comparison is valid, as in the show trials of the defeated Germans, the 'War crimes' they were accused of were pure propaganda fantasy, and the very real war crimes against the people of Europe, (such as the Hamburg and Dresden holocausts (massacres by fire-bombing) and the Berlin mass-rapes and massacre (by advancing east-Asian Red Army soldiers)), were ignored.  Such it is with the trial of Ratko Mladić, who is accused of non-crimes, whilst the real crimes of the Bosniaks and their NATO-UK-US sponsors, are ignored.

In the 22/6/98 edition of the Bosnian Muslim newspaper, Dani, an interview with Bosnian SDP President, Hakija Meholjic, records the following statement:

...(at the time of the Bosniak Convention) We were received there by President Izetbegovic, and immediately after the welcome he asked us: "What do you think about the swap of Srebrenica for Vogosca [a Sarajevo suburb]?" There was a silence for a while and then I said: "Mr. President, if this is a done thing, then you should not have invited us here, because we have to return and face the people and personally accept the burden of that decision." Then he (Izetbegovic) said:  "You know, I was offered by Clinton in April 1993 (after the fall of Cerska and Konjevic Polje) that the Chetnik (Bosnian Serb) forces enter Srebrenica, carry out a slaughter of 5,000 Muslims, and then there will be a military intervention."  Our delegation was composed of nine people, one among us was from Bratunac and unfortunately he is the only one not alive now, but all the others from the delegation are alive and can confirm this. 

(Source: http://www.ex-yupress.com/dani/dani2.html)

The Bosniak leadership colluded with NATO aggressors to create the idea of a 'massacre' in Srebrenica, to justify international interference in the Yugoslavian war of cessation.  The bodies of Bosniak soldiers killed in fighting against Serbian and Croatian forces were gathered for display to create the imagery of a massacre, in order to dæmonise the Serbs in the eyes of the global public.  Ratko Mladić fought to defend his people from alien aggressors who sought to destroy Serbia.  There was no massacre at Srebrenica, although the foreign fighters recruited by the USA to fight alongside the Bosniaks, did murder many thousands of Serbian civilians in their war to occupy sovereign European soil.  Such is the way of the people we have come to know as Al Qaeda.

An Islamic writer also notes the lies of the NATO terrorists:

• Representatives of the Bosniac community gathered in Sarajevo on 28 and 29 September to vote on the peace package. A delegation of Bosniacs from Srebrenica was transported to Sarajevo by UNPROFOR [UN forces in Bosnia] helicopter to participate in the debate. Prior to the meeting, the delegation met in private with [Bosnian] President Izetbegovic, who told them that there were Serb proposals to exchange Srebrenica and Zepa for territories around Sarajevo. The delegation opposed the idea, and the subject was not discussed further. Some surviving members of the Srebrenica delegation have stated that President Izetbegovic also told them he had learned that a NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina was possible, but could only occur if the Serbs were to break into Srebrenica, killing at least 5,000 of its people.  (http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/safe.htm#115)

• I know that they are now trying to humiliate people from Srebrenica and spread rumors that we supposedly did not fight and were slain while running away from Srebrenica. No one can deny that in the Srebrenica municipality there are 2,000 buried fighters. No one can deny that we set up a large free territory. However, without assistance from outside we could not hold out for long surrounded by the enemy. You can write that I absolutely support the statement by Hakija Meholjic that we were betrayed. Why does not someone refute his assertions with arguments? Instead they are using slander and saying that Hakija was like this and like that. Hakija was among the first people in Srebrenica to pick up a rifle and work on the organisation of the resistance. Therefore, he has the right to speak up. Ibran Mustafic and those women do not have the right to make lists for the Hague Tribunal. They do not have any evidence for that. In Srebrenica, Ibran refused to fight and lead a brigade, but turned to his prewar flirt with politics. As far as Hakija is concerned, you can write that every single child from Srebrenica agrees with his statement."

(Source: http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/kilibarda/islamist.htm)

The truth of the 'Srebrenica Massacre' is very different from the lies of the media.  The Serbs offered to exchange Srebrenica for the largely Muslim territories of Zepa and the vicinity of Sarajevo.  This would have allowed for the creation of a ethnically and religiously homogeneous Muslim Bosnia, bordered by ethnically homogeneous and religiously stable enlarged nations of Croatia and Serbia.  Contrary to the hysteria of the Zionist media, Albania is a largely secular nation, and although formally Islamic, Albanian women dress as ordinary Europeans.  The separation of Bosnia could have created a moderate Muslim country in the Balkans, bordered by strengthened homelands for Serbia and Croatia.  This sane and natural ideal does not fit in with the thinking of the internationalists.

Slobodan Milošević was murdered for the crime of loving his people, and desiring to keep his homeland as a united territory, with cultural and ethnic homogeneity.  Internationalism dictates that there can be no ethnically pure countries (except that of the ruling elite) and that there can be no identifiable culture other than consumerism.  Ratko Mladić's only 'crime' is that he fought for his people.  He is a true European hero who is being used as an example to silence all who oppose the international order. 

The Srebrenica Massacre is pure propaganda which can easily be compared with the mass of propaganda used by the internationalists to justify their wars of economic conquest, such as:

1. German soldiers bayoneting Belgian babies and crucifying civilians in the Great War
2. Holyhoax lies of mobile (and shower-room) gas chambers, electrocution swimming baths, shrunken heads, human skin-lampshades, etc
3. The Gulf War fable of Iraqi soldiers taking Kuwaiti babies from incubators and allowing them to die
4. Osama Bin Laden's destruction of the World Trade Centre with thermite, sorry hijacked æroplanes (used to justify invading Afghanistan, home to his enemies, the Taliban)
5. The Gulf War II, Weapons of Mass Destruction fiction
6. The wholly made-up Benghazi Massacre in Libya
7. Syrian government 'oppression' of 'rebels' (war of survival against foreign-owned terrorists)
8. Nuclear-bomb seeking Iran

 is another patriot who is being persecuted by the Courts of the real International War Criminals.  He is a hero and deserves the support of everyone who cherishes freedom.  The real War Criminals in the tragedy of the destruction of Bosnian Serbia are Bill Clinton and all the leaders of the USA, UK, EU and NATO who supported the aggression against a proud European nation.  It is the traitors in Belgrade who delivered Slobodan Milošević, Ratko Mladić and other Serbian patriots to the international despots in the Hague, as well as the likes of Clinton (and his wife, the butcher of Libya), who deserve to be punished for crimes against humanity.  Unfortunately they own the international courts, and so they will never be tried under their own international law.  One would hope that the Clintons, Tony Blair, William Hague, Obama, and the many, many, other terrorist leaders walking freely around the world will be dealt with by natural justice.  They cannot rely on their security 24/7 and hopefully one day they will reap what they have sewn.

An article detailing the main sources of the Srebrenica propaganda can be found at http://www.beoforum.rs/dokumenti/Six-Sources-of-the-Srebrenica-Legend.pdf 

God Bless Ratko Mladić, defender of Serbia, and true European hero.

François Hollande: Internationalist, Multi-cultist, Materialist

The new Socialist President of France, François Hollande, has made his first speech as leader of the French Republic.  The new President used his inaugural address to address the problems facing France. He stated,

"Our differences should not become divisive. Our diversity should not disunite us. The country needs reconciliation," [and the new Socialist regime will fight] "racism, anti-Semitism and all other forms of discrimination."

So there you have it. Paris can continue its descent into a non-European hell-hole where French people are a declining and increasingly degenerate minority, but that's OK, as it is a part of France's diversity! The main emphasis on the new regime will be to implement thought policing to combat 'racism' (French patriotism) and 'anti-Semitism' (opposition to wars for Israel).

Hollande was elected as a backlash against Sarkozy, the butcher of Libya.  Hollande is just as thoroughly Zionist as Sarkozy, and the people have merely swapped one puppet of international finance for another.

The murder of three children and a Rabbi in March shocked France, and now the reason for the False Flag operation becomes apparent. The children were sacrificed in order to create the fantasy that Jews in France are in danger.  Both Hollande and Sarkozy played on this contrived event in order to gain the Jewish vote; in the democratic system, people were killed as an electoral strategy. Nice. Hollande's very first speech reinforced his allegiance to Israel and International Jewry. Hollande has expressed his fear of an Iranian attack against Israel, and for all his pro-Palestinian rhetoric, he is just another Zionist place-man.

President Hollande was selected by the hidden powers to succeed Sarkozy, in much the way as all the 'leaders' of Europe are pre-selected by the money power. The media revelations of corruption levelled against Sarkozy, including his acceptance of funding from Libya (which still didn't stop him attacking the once free country), helped to build an image of Sarkozy as a man unfit to rule.  The character assassination of Sarkozy allowed for Hollande to take his place. The people of France voted for a man who will revive France, relax the Austerity measures, and return France to its natural politically incorrect character. The people of France will be disappointed.

Hollande will not deliver to the French people what they want, because he cannot do so, even if he wanted to.  French people will continue to be raped by the bankers, and to have their culture marginalised as the European land continues to be forced deeper into the internationalist multi-culti trap.  How long will it be before French forces are in Syria fighting for the expansion of the Zionist menace?  How long before the French will be in the streets protesting against the new stooge of internationalism? My guess would be that the name of Hollande will be as hated as that of Sarkozy within months.

Liberté, égalité, fraternité. These slogans are a sarcastic mocking of the indigenous people of France, who will have no freedom, are being reduced to second class citizens in their own country, and have laws to prohibit employment and preference of their own kin.  It is the same for every nation of Europe,.

Plus ça change.