Feminism: Enslaving women and abolishing femininity

What is Feminism?  Looking at the word, it must surely be something to do with celebrating the female, and all that is feminine, right?  Well, no, it isn't.  Then what else can it be?  If it isn't a celebration of the wonders of the female, then what can it be?  Feminism is a classic example of double-speak; it is no less than a crusade to destroy the female.

Feminists start with the premise that women are oppressed by male society.  They argue that it is an act of oppression which sees men killing themselves with heavy manual labour, whilst women are encouraged to undertake physically less demanding work than men, or to stay at home and look after the family.  What feminists fail to appreciate is that men and women are built differently and have different qualities to one another.  According to feminists, men and women are exactly the same, and so should be treated as such.  To anyone who has ever encountered a member of the opposite sex, the notion that we are no different is ludicrous.

Early Feminists argued that it was wrong that only men were allowed to cast meaningless votes for political parties who would ignore their promises upon election.  They side-stepped the fact that only men from the ruling class were allowed to take part in the sham democratic system.  After years of campaigning, universal suffrage was introduced, leading to the current situation where every drooling buffoon who can make a cross on a ballot paper, can vote.  Rather than demand that the fraudulent democracy be overturned, and a system of government be introduced to run the country by virtue of expertise, rather than by how convincingly one could smile at the electorate, the feminists and their fellow travellers, extended the already failed system to become the ochlocratic charade we endure today.  Thanks for that.

Having secured the survival of the fake democratic system, and prevented its replacement with rule by an educated elite who would have governed according to their specialised expertise, the feminists set about abolishing the family.  Why?  Because, apparently it is degrading for a woman to be a mother, and to look after her husband and home!  Absolute nonsense!  Motherhood is one of the hardest but most important tasks anyone could undertake.  To belittle the contribution to the nation of those who raise the next generation is sheer lunacy.  Lunacy it may be, but again, the feminists scored a victory, and now children are seen by many as a burden, to be dispatched to strangers in nurseries and schools as soon as it is practicable.  Marriage became old-fashioned, and so children without Fathers became more prevalent.  The bastardised society inevitably became the greater broken home, wracked by crime and disorder - exactly as those behind the feminist movement planned.

Bolstering the fraudulent rule of the despots, breaking the family, wrecking marriage, destroying children, turning women into unpaid whores and unborn child-killers  - all theses objectives of feminism were achieved under the banner of liberation from oppression; but the lunacy did not end there.

Women were told that it was their right to be producer-consumers, and that the men who protected them from wage-slavery were their oppressors.  Thus women joined the workforce, and in order to compete with men in male environments, had to become caricatures of men.  Feminist propaganda describes men as cruel, manipulative and deceitful, thus women infected with feminism believe they have to become that way, only moreso.  Patience, empathy, compassion, and all other virtues are decried by feminists as weaknesses resulting from subjugation to patriarchal oppression; all that matters is the pursuit of money, which has to be undertaken in the manner of an individualistic brute.  Some men fit the caricature, but most do not.  Those who have have had female bosses of the feminist variety will know how unfeminine these creatures can be, and how unpleasant they are to work for.

Women have qualities which should be nurtured and developed.  Feminism denies the innate qualities which women tend to have.  Thankfully only a minority of women have bought the feminist lie in its entirety, but the ones that have are a menace, thrusting their mendacity on all who are exposed to them.  The impact of feminism has been profound, as most women have adopted some parts of the insane ideology.   Lesbianism, is of course, another feminist victory, and a dead end for its victims.

Feminism has been a negative force which has wrecked the countries in which it has been allowed to take hold.  Such is the power of the feminist media that women have become conditioned to view all who defend their natural right to be feminine, (and to be protected from the harsh masculine domain), as enemies and oppressors.   What is oppressive about wishing to empower a woman to raise her own children without the intervention of the State?  What is oppressive about taking on the male role of bread-winner and provider, so that the woman is free to fulfil her natural role as nurturer?  What is oppressive about a husband being a husband?

In the natural society, the relationship between men and women is complimentary, not competitive.  Each has his or her own abilities and qualities which together are mutually beneficial.  Feminism is the Trojan horse which has ruined our lands under the guise of a movement for emancipation.  Feminism is a lie, and the sooner it is consigned to history, the sooner our people will be free.  Equality which reduces the people to servitude, is the ultimate tyranny.

Houla Massacre: Another BBC Lie

The above image needs to be clicked on to enlarge it, and then read thoroughly.  The BBC has yet again been caught out pushing propaganda on behalf of the war mongers of the Establishment.  The latest incident features imagery of a child skipping over the bagged up corpses of slain civilians.  According to the BBC, the corpses are those of Syrians murdered by the Syrian government, and are incontrovertible proof that the government of Bashar Al Assad must be overthrown.  The so-called Houla Massacre is a complete fraud; the corpses are those of Kurds recovered from a mass grave in 2003 in Al Musayyib. 

The BBC have really surpassed themselves with this propaganda gaff.  Not only have they used stock imagery to invent a massacre in order to demand military intervention against Syria, but the imagery they have used features people who were murdered with the full blessing of the UK government.  At the time that the Kurds were slaughtered in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was the darling of the west, and just as with the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians, the victims were of no consequence to the western despots.

The fake Houla Massacre comes at the time that the Serbian hero, Ratko Mladić, is on trial for the murder of Muslims in Srebrenica.  The Houla Massacre is a repetition of the Srebrenica Massacre - Neither of them is real, and both of these propaganda exercises serve to stir up hatred for besieged nations fighting for their very survival against the international aggression of finance imperialism.

The BBC presents itself as the most beloved broadcaster of the world.  Of course this is a typical propaganda technique.  For those who care to look behind the lies, the BBC is a loathsome and belligerent propaganda tool of a regime of tyrants who have no empathy for humanity; only a lust for wealth and power.

In 2001 the BBC infamously broadcast live video footage of the Salomon Building (World Trade Centre 7) collapsing due to the (State) terrorist attack.  It broadcast too early, and the building could clearly be seen standing and smouldering behind the reporter's left shoulder.  The BBC was instrumental in creating the Al Qaeda myth which blamed Afghanistan for 9/11, the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie which justified the invasion of Iraq, the Srebrenica lie which legitimised the destruction of Serbia and the creation of the bandit states of Kosovo and Bosnia-Metohija, the Benghazi færytale used to crush Libya, and now it is driving the entire anti-Syrian campaign, and the campaign against Iran.  All the while, the BBC has ignored the crimes of Israel against the people of Palestine and other territories occupied by the Jewish State.

The BBC is a lie factory.  It has been the mouthpiece of the British State since its birth.  It has propagandised ceaselessly for the materialistic Internationale, and has destroyed the lives of those who oppose its sinister agenda.  The BBC still misuse the photographs of the German victims of Red Army brutality and RAF terror bombing in the Second World War; presenting them as dead Jews killed by the Germans.  The misuse of the Al Musayyib photographs as proof of a massacre in Houla is a repetition of the propaganda against Germany, and indeed all the 'Goyim' of Europe.

The BBC is the bastion of political correctness, and uses its so-called entertainment programmes to defame heterosexuality, faithfulness, ethnic cohesion, culture and indeed all that is natural and wholesome.  The BBC is the enemy of humanity.  Everything it produces is the propaganda of the Establishment.

The lies of the BBC are being used to soften the British people so that the people accept, nay demand, war against Syria.  These lies must be exposed.  If we stay silent as the BBC promotes the destruction of all nations who do not bow to the Zionist Internationale, then who will speak when they come for us?  We need a common front against the vipers of the Establishment.  

To anyone who still pays a licence fee to this vermin, surely it is time to stop?  Let them know why you will not pay for their lies.  We in the UK have to inform our countrymen of the truth.  The lies of the BBC are repeated hypnotically until they become accepted subconsciously.  It is not enough to understand that the BBC lies; we must inform everyone we can of the truth.  Don't let the Houla lie become the justification for the destruction of Syria and the expansion of the Israeli terror state.  We have voices.  We must use them.

Israeli politicians fight against Multi-culturalism in Israel

All is not well in Israel.  The home of the architects of multi-culturalism is being rocked by the disastrous ideology of their own making.  Like the Golem of Prague, Multi-culturalism is out of control, and now having destroyed the enemies of its creator, seeks to destroy the creator as well.

Multi-culturalism is the most destructive weapon of the internationalists.  No nation can survive if it has to abandon its cultural integrity to accommodate people who have different traditions and aspirations.  Multi-culturalism destroys natural organic cultures and leaves in its wake a mass of bland incomplete meaningless non-cultures which cannot rise above the level of animalistic materialism.  This is exactly what the internationalists which to achieve; a world of rootless and interchangeable producer-consumers who are kept away from high ideals by having no historical, ethnic, cultural and geographical point of reference from which to form their own identities.  Multi-culturalism is the genocidal weapon of internationalism.

In Israel, the Jewish State itself is under attack.  Treacherous liberal politicians have betrayed the Jewish people and allowed for vast numbers of immigrants to enter the country.  Interestingly, the non-Jewish immigrants are referred to as infiltrators, which is quite appropriate.  All immigrants are infiltrators insofar as they are being used to destroy nations and pave the way for a single international slave state.  It was Jews who created the liberal lunacy of mass-migration, and 'minority rights' (except in countries such as South Africa where the European minority has no rights whatsoever).  The Jews considered themselves immune to the cancer of internationalism which was meant to destroy the Goyim and create a Talmudic utopia where the Jews were waited on hand and foot by the lower animals.  What the Jews are experiencing for themselves, is what they have crafted for the rest of us.

In Tel Aviv, the Hativka district is almost completely populated by 'asylum seekers' and refugees whose countries have been devastated by wars for the creation of the one world state; wars which have been fuelled by Zionist imperialism.  The people in Tel Aviv who are suffering through their neighbourhoods being turned into Third World slums, only have their government to thank.  

In a sane world, nations would be protected from foreign interference, and mono-culturalism would be the norm.  The people of Hativka, who ironically have had all 'hope' of a happy future torn from under them, are suffering as a result of the supremacist ideology which has its roots in Talmud.  There would be no refugees if the right of people to live amongst their own kind and live according to their own cultures was respected, and if economies were fully self-sufficient, with absolute national ownership of everything being the norm, and the notion of multi-national corporatism and international finance imperialism being something to be guarded against.  As is usual in every country, the elite gain whilst the common people suffer.

The reaction to the infiltration of Israel by non-Jews has been protest and in places violence.  If the outpourings of frustration at having their jobs, housing and services given to foreigners were those of Europeans in Europe, there would be footage in the mainstream media and hysterical cries of 'racism' levelled at the people who have been denied a democratic voice to oppose the destruction of their countries, and so have no choice but to demonstrate.  As the protests are those of Jews in Israel, the media hysteria is deafeningly silent.

There are those who would gloat that the Golem of multi-culturalism is now wreaking havoc in Israel, but that helps no one.  We need to destroy the Golem once and for all and restore all nations to stability and mono-ethnic, mono-cultural strength.

Likud MK, Danny Dannon, has called for transit camps to be set up in preparation for the relocation of the immigrants to their countries of origin.  The politically correct internationalists referred to the use of transit camps in Europe as concentration camps and invented the lie of the holocaust to forever blacken the idea of population relocation as something sinister.  Just as the transit camps of the 1940s were necessary to defend Europe, so are those proposed by MK Dannon if Israel is to survive.

As reported in Haaretz,

Dannon said that the immediate solution for calming the situation and for putting a stop to the violence requires the evacuation of the African migrants from south Tel Aviv.

"The infiltrators must be distanced immediately," he said. "We must expedite the construction of temporary detention facilities and remove Africans from population centres."

MK Michael Ben Ari (National Union), who makes regular appearances at protests against the migrant population of Tel Aviv, nonetheless said he was “very upset by the violence.” Ben Ari pointed out, however, that “there are things that are outside of my control, that’s the reality.”

Ben Ari expressed satisfaction that his campaign to remove the migrant population from Tel Aviv has begun to gain momentum. “Suddenly we see MK’s from Likud and Kadima showing up at protests. Suddenly I hear the Interior Minister saying things I’ve said myself,” said Ben Ari.

The only solution to the tragedy of multi-culturalism is for the entire international experiment to be abandoned and for all countries to be restored to their indigenous populations.  In the case of Israel, this would mean the relocation of the Jews.  An end to the banking fraud and its usurious interest demands would leave the economies of the world free to support their own people, and would make migration unBirobidjan (or even back to their original homeland, Khazaria, if the non Jewish Khazars would allow their return).

The scenes of outright supremacist racism in the following video are typical of the Talmudic mindset.  For the sake of all humanity, the movement of people which provokes such hatred must be reversed, and a natural healthy world restored. 

Direct Link to video: http://youtu.be/gOomBSTTzrU

A little security to stave off a lot of harm

Periodically I am asked details about myself, and I routinely answer to the effect that I cannot answer.  I am not being standoffish by this reluctance to part with personal information.  Rather I am being cautious.  

Some years ago when I was far too trusting (and perhaps to confident) for my own good, I did verbal battle with a group of internationalists.  The outcome of our discourse was that I was followed home, and in the early hours of the morning, my flat was firebombed.  A neighbour called the police, who asked me what I had done to deserve being attacked!  A short while afterwards, a parcel with wires sticking out of it was placed under my car.  I very much doubt that the parcel was anything to worry about, but the message I was sent was clear enough - I had stepped on the wrong toes, and the attack against my flat was to be but the start.  My rental period was nearly over anyway, so I took the opportunity to move to a new location.  Since that time, I have been more cautious with regards to giving out personal information.

It is not brave and heroic to make oneself an easy target.  By using a pseudonym, and keeping all identifiable information to myself, I am protecting my family.  Does it really matter who I am?  In a war for freedom against a police state with its violent 'politically correct' foot-soldiers, the only weapon we have available to us is the truth, and the will to speak the truth.  In the grander scheme, our individual identities are meaningless.  There are those who seek glory, and in the pursuit of it sacrifice their children's future.  I am not amongst them. 

It may seem pointless to keep information private, when we all know that the police have all our details and internet activity on record.  It is the useful idiots who ally themselve to the State but do not know it, who we need to protect ourselves against.  One day we will have to openly do battle with the collaborators, but that time is not now.  As the struggle gets harder, and the power of the enemy increases, it is the duty of each and every one of us to keep ourselves safe for the time when we may have to make the ultimate sacrifice.  We will not be able to help our kin if we are neutralised now, when we can avoid it.

The UK is a dangerous place.  A little caution now, will serve us well for the future.  Security is a good habit to get into.

Searchlight: Fighting against Freedom since 1962

The UK is home to the centre of international finance capitalism, known alternately as the Crown, or the City of London.  The Establishment which controls the UK has been so thoroughly mixed with Khazar financiers, that it is not inaccurate to describe the ruling class of the UK as Jews.  This is not 'racist' or anti-Semitic (which of course it wouldn't be, considering most Jews in the UK are Caucasian Khazars); it is simply descriptive.  Against this backdrop of total Zionism in the political and economic power elite, it should come as no surprise that anyone who speaks out against those who view the common people as their property, is slandered as an enemy of freedom.  This couldn't be further from the case.  Those who oppose the rule of the Establishment are the true defenders of freedom, but such is the Orwellian nature of the UK, that we are slandered for seeking to break free of our chains.  We who are not content to be producer-consumers with no identity other than our bank details are apparently a danger to 'democracy'. How dare we ask for more than the scraps from our masters' table?

In the UK, anyone who does not follow the diktat of the Establishment is instantly labelled as a far-right extremist, Fascist, Nazi etc.  The likes of the UAF are more than happy to use physical intimidation and violence to silence their opponents, but they then proclaim that they are defending freedom against 'Fascism'.  Think about that for one moment.  

According to the truth-distorters, Fascism can be defined as anything which is a danger to freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of expression, and indeed any form of freedom whatsoever.  The Marxist self appointed guardians of 'freedom' seek to address the problems of Fascism by silencing those who disagree with them, using 'any means necessary', or to put that into plain English, physical violence and threats of violence.

The central organising point for the 'anti-Fascist' is the Searchlight Magazine, which is controlled by Gerry and Sonia Gable.  The Gables are hard line Communists and Jews, and so are hardly impartial defenders of democracy.  They have an agenda for the abolition of national frontiers and for the establishment of a global workers' plantation, where the oppressed proletariat of the modern age become the slaves of the Chosen elite.  To even use the word Zionism is to bring down their ire.  They are ideologically opposed to any semblance of freedom which threatens their Marxist utopia.  Although opposed to the Socialist Workers Party on minutiæ of Marxian dogma, they are proud to work with the SWP front group, United Against Fascism, by sharing information regarding the 'Fascist' enemy, thus enabling a more efficient way to beat the enemy into submission.  They are also very keen on using the police to do their dirty work, although they hypocritically attack the police in their publications as, yes you guessed it, Fascists!

Common tactics used by the Searchlight family include:

• Printing photographs of opponents in their publications, complete with names, addresses, and work details
• Contacting employers and threatening to boycott their products and/or protest on their premises if named individuals are not immediately dismissed from employment
• Telephoning staff at venues where meetings are due to be held (or in progress), and threatening violence against the staff if the meetings continue.  This level of intimidation can include bomb hoaxes, and considering the connection of the 'anti-Fascist' organisations with the State-controlled terrorist IRA, these threats are not to be ignored (See Dominic Noonan, a Documentary (parts 1 and 2))
• Anonymously tipping off the police with bogus calls about criminal activity, to ensure meetings are raided and wrecked, despite being perfectly legal
• Massing in large numbers then attacking individuals, leaving the victims in need of hospital treatment, or in some instances, leaving the victims dead.

The tactics of Searchlight and the UAF centre on the single objective of denying anyone who does not agree with their disturbed politics, any freedom whatsoever.  They fight to stop freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and ultimately, freedom of thought.  In their fight, they have the full support of the Trades Unions Congress (hope not hate), and the government.  They are constantly invited to speak on the BBC to advise the public as to the dangers to democracy posed by those they fight, and are even invited into schools to indoctrinate educate children into the ways of politically correct multi-culti international servitude.

So who are these evil people who the darlings of the Establishment are fighting to silence?  Who are the people who are so terrible that the government can turn a blind eye to violence and terrorism in order to keep their views unheard?

The evil doers include:

• Campaigners for Morality and Decency
• Defenders of Culture
• Opponents of the 'New World Order'
• Real (non-Marxian) Socialists
• Libertarians
• Free Speech activists
• Global Warming / Man-made Climate Change researchers
• Friends of Palestine
• Crusaders for Free Libya, Syria, and all the other countries under military attack by the NATO terror
• Religious and spiritually-focused groups
• Pro-lifers
• Historical revisionists and Holocaust-truth seekers
• 9/11, 7/7, and all False Flag exposing groups
• Anyone who believes in genuine global racial diversity through local indigenous ethnic exclusivity
• Patriots, Nationalists and all anti-internationalists
• Opponents of the European Union, United Nations and the coming global Slave State
• Distributists and Social Credit advocates
• Advocates of a Usury-free economy and an end to international materialism
• Genuine Workers' Rights groups
• Defenders of border controls and all who oppose unlimited immigration and population displacement
• Defenders of Motherhood and the sacred right of Women to raise their own children and not be wage-slaves
• Home Schoolers

The above list is far from exhaustive, and I would expect that readers of this blog

True to the spirit of anti-Fascism, Searchlight operates a 'No Platform' policy which means that anyone who is libelled by their odorous publication is denied the right to defend him or herself.  All opposing views are silenced, and the only comments allowed are those which support the agenda of the internationale.  This is what passes for democracy in the UK.  If Searchlight was just another crank magazine aimed at drug-addled students, it wouldn't merit an article exposing its vile nature.  However, the self-Chosen emissaries of anti-Fascism are regularly invited to advise the police, social services, schools and other State groups on policy.  They are a real menace to freedom, and need to be confronted at every opportunity.  

How ironic that the over-used word Fascism has been twisted to describe the very actions that Searchlight indulges in.  But then of course, it is in the nature of the advocates of internationalism that the terminology they use has no bearing on reality.  I would invite the Gables to discuss what I have written, but then as the UK's foremost censors, I doubt that they would have the decency to talk with anyone who dares to disagree with them.  Violence, intimidation and terror are their preferred means of communication.  And they dare to claim they are defending democracy?  Chutzpah anyone?

Further Reading:

http://searchlightexposed.com/
Liars Ought to have Good Memories

Libya's Puppet Leader honours his owner's uniformed thugs

The puppet interim ruler of Libya, Abdurrahim El-Keib, is in London to propagandise for his pay-masters against the country over which they installed him to rule for them.  El-Keib has layed a wreath of white roses and carnations at the place where British security forces murdered UK police woman, Yvonne Fletcher.  The 1984 murder was blamed on the Libyan government, and used to create an atmosphere of hatred against the North African country.  The Fletcher false flag operation was followed up by the bombing of  Pan Am 103 as it flew over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people.  Like the Fletcher case, the Lockerbie victims were murdered to dæmonise Libya, and the real culprits were the UK and US security forces.

Yvonne Fletcher was shot by gunmen who were outside the Libyan Embassy in St James Square London.  Her murder was used to justify economic sanctions against Libya, and the breakdown in diplomatic relations between London and Tripoli.  Interestingly, one of the men at the scene at the time of the Fletcher shooting was none other than Peter Power - a man who would later become infamous for running drills to deal with bombings on the London Transport network at exactly the time that MI5 bombed the Underground and Tavistock Square.  Peter Power has not been investigated for his role in the Fletcher shooting or the 7/7 atrocity, but then of course as a State operative, he wouldn't be.

The killing of Yvonne Fletcher was designed to associate Muammar Al Qaddafi with terrorism.  This prepared the way for the USAF bombing of Libya in 1986.  Having created the image of Qaddafi as a mad dictator who murdered innocent police women in cold blood, there was no organised protest to the attempted murder of Qaddafi by ærial terror. 

In 1988, the Lockerbie bombing took place, with 270 people murdered by the CIA and MI5.  In the eyes of the public, this was a Qaddafi attack in revenge for the murder of his adopted daughter in the 1986 US terror strike, which of course was a reprisal for the 1984 murder of Fletcher.  Each event was built on the one before it, and each helped to create the idea that Libya must be liberated from the rule of Qaddafi (although the Libyan system of People's Congresses meant that Qaddafi was not a dictator in any case).

An official enquiry was launched into the slaying of Fletcher, but its findings have still not been released.  Surely if there was incontrovertible proof that someone inside the Libyan Embassy had killed Fletcher, then the results of the enquiry would have been reported widely?  Afterall, Fletcher was killed on television having been positioned perfectly for the TV cameras.

In 1996, the US government contracted Osama Bin Laden's Al Qaeda units (CIA owned) to murder Qaddafi, paying their favourite bogeyman $100,000 to murder the Libyan Head of State.  In the whole Libyan saga there have been plenty of terrorist atrocities, but aimed against Qaddafi's Libya, rather than directed by them.

In 1999, Libya sought an end to the sanctions which had been imposed since 1984 and accepted 'general responsibility' for the killing of WPC Fletcher.  This error in judgement, gave credibility to the MI5 propaganda tale of evil Qaddafi the woman killer.  The Libyan Embassy siege was major news in the UK, following the assassination of Fletcher by her colleagues, and the constant repetition of her slaying in front of anti-Qaddafi demonstrators (of the NTC/Al Qaeda variety), burned into the public consciousness the idea that Libya was ruled by a despot who must be stopped.  Qaddafi's ploy to end sanctions against Libya by accepting responsibility for a crime that loyal Libyans did not commit only further alienated his regime in the eyes of the public.  Indeed, coupled with the færytale of Libyan responsibility for Lockerbie, the media-drugged people of the UK could barely be expected to think anything other than that the Libyan regime was 'evil'.

Fletcher was killed as part of a long running propaganda exercise to justify the invasion of Libya and the theft of its oil.  The psychological warfare culminated in the murder of Qaddafi which was graphically broadcast on television throughout the world.  In the UK, the media linked the brutal destruction of Libya to Fletcher and Lockerbie, and declared that Qaddafi had brought his murder upon himself.  The media were literally judge, jury and executioner in this case.

El-Keib is a paid traitor, in the service of the international criminals who destroyed the country he now rules.  His presence in London is a continuation of the false flag propaganda against Libya, which is being used to justify the take-over of the oil rich country, and the snuffing out of direct democracy and self-sufficiency.  Yesterday he vowed to bring those guilty of the Lockerbie massacre to justice, and today he repeated the propaganda against Libya in the Fletcher shooting; El Keib is proving himself to be a very useful puppet, who is more than happy to reinforce the lies against the previous administrative system, and by so doing ensure that the real criminals (Al Qaeda, NTC, MI5, CIA etc) get away with murder, again and again.

Direct link to video: http://youtu.be/0l1J11WNQAs

Society is drowning in pornography

A reader asked me if I watch pornography.  I do not, but I would be lying if I said that I have never seen any. I think that in our decadent society, it has become something of a rite of passage for boys to get hold of a porno video and some beer and go through the awkward and embarrassing ordeal of pretending to be more experienced than they really are.  I think for boys, porn provides information which can be used to more plausibly lie to your friends about how far you have gone with girls, when in fact you are still innocent. Watching porn is like smoking, or drinking underage - it is supposed to make you more grown up, but really just damages your health.

Hollywood and television push the idea that children who watch porn, drink and smoke are more grown up than those who don't - and that being grown up is all that matters. Perhaps having fallen prey to the damaging power of television when a teenager is why I am so opposed to watching television these days, and to watching all negative films etc, which has to include porn.

I am not an angel by any means, and I have at times been a part of the herd. As I wrote in yesterday's article, freeing oneself is the hardest battle, and a very hard battle it is indeed. I used to watch television soap operas to the point of addiction (yes, even Coronation Street). Soaps tell you what to do; porn tells you how to treat members of the opposite sex. In both cases the propaganda is woefully wrong. Soaps are now semi-pornographic in content, so the decadence and selfishness of the porn industry, is now fused with the social engineering of the entertainment industry.  This is not good.

Pornography teaches that it is OK to have sex with absolutely anyone, and that there is absolutely no need to know the individual one is having sex with.  From a male perspective, this reduces all females to the position of objects to ejaculate into/over.  Pornography has been a key influence in the sexualisation of society.  The sexualised society has no barriers of decency.  Adultery has become normalised, with marriage offering no protection from sexual predators, or indeed the wedding ring preventing the individual from having extra-marital sex.  I have stated that I am no angel, and that I have made grave mistakes in my life, but adultery is not one of them.  I find myself in a shrinking minority, as marriage vows become meaningless.

Porn and the entertainment media have been used to destroy the institution of marriage.  The printed media are awash with stories of infidelity, and with ridiculous 'celebrity' marriages which last for a few months, before the couple part and then re-marry or shack-up with other people of various hues and sexes.  The message such celebrity behaviour sends is that marriage is only for as long as it is convenient, and that divorce is no big deal.  This has led to many people not bothering to marry at all, and drifting from one sexual relationship to another; often with clandestine sexual encounters interspersed along the way.  Marriage is a lifelong commitment which must be one of absolute monogamy, but for many people (probably most people in the UK) the probability of one spouse 'cheating' on the other is very high.

Television programmes such as 90210 concentrate on stories of children 'shagging' one another, and on the need to be rich and popular.  I haven't seen any more up-to-date television, but I can only assume the emphasis on sex and materialism has increased rather than decreased.  Children are even more susceptible to the harmful influence of film and television than adults, which is why such media are becoming increasingly hard to distinguish from soft porn - and why pornography is becoming ever more extreme and mechanical.

I used to watch Emmerdale Farm with its stories about farming and rural Yorkshire.  I stopped watching it when it became Emmerdale, and the farming folk were replaced by bed-hopping urbanites.  I wasted a lot of precious time glued to the idiot box, but that time did at least allow me to witness the deterioration of television and the merger of the entertainment industry with soft porn. 

One only has to look at the music industry to see how far our society has fallen; whereas music was once an uplifting influence, it is now a sex-fest with the likes of Lady Gaga promoting homosexuality and Rhianna promoting sado-masochism.  All modern music, of course, promotes miscegenation.  'Pop' music is a tool of the social engineers which is used to break down barriers to internationalism; barriers of decency, fidelity, heterosexuality, family, ethnic identity, culture, tradition, and all that is wholesome.  Pop music  has become porn music.

The taxation system in the UK punishes families.  The welfare system actively encourages women to have children out of wedlock, and to raise their children without the father(s).  The deification of selfishness, materialism, and sex for fun (1960s-spawned hippy free-love, man), are all reinforced by the propaganda that the only person who matters is oneself.  To destroy a society, the building blocks must be broken.  Creating the idea that monogamy and family are old-fashioned and oppressive, has been a key objective of the internationalists; pornography has pushed this agenda to the point where morality is mocked.  The likes of the EDL who demand the right of Muslim women to dress like prostitutes, are a fine example of the mind-rotting effect of the sexualised society.  Islam has no place in Europe, but the belief expressed by liberal-reactionaries who promote the idea that it is a woman's 'right' to dress and behave as a whore, is outrageous.

Pornography has no place in a healthy society.  In Franco's Spain, pornography was illegal, but brothels were not.  There will always be men who are prepared to pay for sex, and men who are unable to have a meaningful relationship.  In the UK, pornography is everywhere, yet prostitution is illegal.  The result is that men have become overwhelmed by sexual imagery and due to the dehumanising quality of porn, feel they have a right to sex when they want it.  In the clubs and bars across the UK, it is common for men to go out with the express aim of having anonymous sex with anyone who will let them.  Women are just as bad as men in this regard.  This has led to a destruction of monogamy and marriage.  

For some men, the constant sexual imagery in the media has created the idea that they can get sex when they want, and when this isn't the case, a minority of men become rapists.  In Franco's Spain, children were not exposed to porn on the television, in music, and in the 'sex education' lessons at school, and women were far less in danger of being raped than in the decadent and diseased liberal mess of the UK.  Of course to praise Franco's prohibition of pornography is to invite screams of 'Fascist!' from the liberal lunatics who run the UK asylum, and who presumably think that the sexualisation of children, spread of homosexuality, and increase in rape, is fine, as these phenomena are a part of the diverse and enriching multi-culti international slave state where sex and possessions are all that matter.  When the internationalists speak of enrichment, they fail to mention that it is the Establishment who become materially enriched as we become spiritually and culturally impoverished  The protection of nation, family, culture, and decency, is anathema to our would-be rulers and their liberal puppets.

Pornography is destructive to the mind of the individual, and to society at large.  Not only must pornography of the 'mucky mag' and sex shop variety be avoided, but also the far more invasive everyday pornography of the Daily Mail/Sun/Star etc, TV Soaps, Hollywood 'Romantic Comedies' etc, and the entire media and education system.  At the risk of inviting howls of liberal indignation, Franco was right.  It is far better that legalised prostitution in areas remote from the public exists to cater for those who cannot find a suitable spouse, than for all of society to be turned into a sexual free-for-all, in which children are targeted as customers for the filth industry.  Give me the protection of El Caudillo over the pollution of the Jewish porn-lords any day!  Do we really need to see the promotion of promiscuity and degenearcy every time we walk down a street with billboards?  Wouldn't a return to the natural society of morality and mental health be much better?