Norland Scarecrow Festival: English Culture Lives

This weekend, the spread-out but sparsely populated Yorkshire village of Norland has hosted its annual Scarecrow Festival.  This festival occurs at the same time as the Rushbearing Festival of the neighbouring town of Sowerby Bridge.  Although the Norland festival is modern, whereas the Sowerby Bridge one dates back centuries, both are a celebration of the local culture.

This year's Norland festival had the theme of events from this year.  Sadly, this resulted in the majority of the Scarecrows being sport related (Football or the Olympics), or being sycophantic displays of Monarchism.  There were a number of effigies of Elizabeth Windsor, suspended by wires, leaving the impression that she was in some way hanging; which were a source of amusement.  The best Scarecrow display by far, had to be one celebrating the anniversary of the musical 'Oliver', which featured a very unflattering and extremely politically incorrect Fagin.  Thankfully the rural and remote village is far enough from the urban centres to not be plagued by the Thought Police, thus allowing the expression of harmless and wholesome humour to continue in the way which is natural to the English.  Urban dwellers can learn much from our rural kin, who continue to live in a healthy and respectable manner by refusing to live in fear of the politically correct censors.

An aspect of the festivals in Sowerby Bridge and Norland, which cannot be denied, is that they are mono-ethnic events.  Both festivals are free for anyone to participate in, yet only indigenous and other European people people do.  This contrasts with the Bradford Mela, which is a festival of Asian culture, but attracts a large number of non-Asians; some of whom take participation beyond merely that of spectators, and take part directly in the events.  Why is there this contrast?  Very simply put, the reason that the indigenous people of Europe take part in immigrant events, but immigrants steer clear of ours, is that it is in our nature to explore other cultures, but in theirs to stick rigidly to their own.

The great lie of multi-culturalism states that Europeans are 'racist' and that non-Europeans are not.  Festivals such as the ones which have occurred at the weekend, prove that it is the newcomers who are racist, insofar as they expect us to bend over backwards to accommodate their cultures, religions and traditions, but wish to have absolutely nothing to do with ours.

The weekend was thoroughly enjoyable, and made a refreshing break from the constant haranguing of the multi-cultists, that it is in some way 'racist' to wish to have a culture of our own.  It made a refreshing change to be immersed fully in the culture of the people.  The only down-side was that so many people in the area chose to celebrate the Windsor mafia; the very family which has done absolutely nothing to prevent the destruction of our lands.  It is under the reign of Elizabeth Windsor that the indigenous population has been forced into ever smaller enclaves, whilst the rest of the country has become alien territory, populated by people who have no desire to learn about our ways, and are more than happy to scream 'racist' to get their way.

It is distressing that our culture has been forced out of the urban centres, but it is invigorating to know that it is alive in the country.  It is evident that the overwhelming majority of those who are not indigenous to Europe, do not in any way identify with our lands and our heritage.  For that reason, it is only right that they should be returned to the lands they love, and not held in territories which mean nothing to them.  They are held here solely by monetary bonds, which could so easily be severed if the financial incentives to leave their homelands - such as the economic rape at the hands of the multi-national corporations, and the military rape of NATO/Al Qaeda - were halted.  Also, of course, granting them 'welfare' handouts doesn't help!  Those who do not wish to be a part of our culture, should be helped to return to the lands they love.  Then, we could see the return of the indigenous culture even to the cities.  Isn't that better than forcing people to submit to the alien dogma of multi-culturalism at the barrel of a taser?

What is a Conspiracy Theory?

In the English language, there is a phrase which is used to silence those who research the rapid transference of wealth and power from sovereign nations to despotic corporations and bureaucrats; research into a self-perpetuating elite who are steadily reducing humanity to nothing more than slaves of their economic machinations.  The phrase most used to silence researchers into this important sphere, is 'Conspiracy Theory'.

What is a Conspiracy Theory?  Well, the phrase is really the union of two distinct concepts.  Each must be dealt with separately.

The word which provokes so much negative reaction is Conspiracy.  But why is that?  It is repugnant to human nature to consider that events which impact upon our lives are directed by others, to our exclusion.  Our egos promote the idea that we have control over our own destinies, however, our histories prove that at no point in recent history, have national and international events unfolded without some guiding force.  Search beneath the official version of history, and one will invariably find some factor which has steered event; normally this factor is overtly economic.

In the USA, there is a cult-like devotion to the 'democratic' system.  If we are to believe the media, the American people really do believe that by putting a cross on  a ballot paper, they are able to decide who should be the President of their country; and, incredibly, that the promises made during the election process will be honoured.  To the faithful devotee of democracy, the US President is an extension of the American people, and works solely to serve them. 

If we look at the policies of successive US Presidents, we can clearly discern a continuity of actions, regardless of the political manifesto.  The end of the sane policy of isolationism in the last century, was but the start of the drive towards turning the USA into the military arm of the One World State.  Can anyone doubt that the US-led NATO is the brutal police force of the international order?

The 11th September Massacre which occurred under George W Bush, was but another instalment of the same terrorising plan enacted by Bill Clinton (Waco, Ruby Ridge, first WTC bombing).  The invasion of Iraq by Bush junior was but a reprise of the attack on Iraq ordered by the people behind his father.  The War on Terror is an ongoing campaign which is physically eliminating opposition to the One World State, a nation at a time.  Bush junior is gone, yet the regime under 'Obama' has not deviated one iota from the agenda - even though the electoral promises which brought the current president to power, were diametrically opposed to everything Bush was doing.  No matter who wins the next election, the same military-economic policies will continue, and the already materially-declining people of the USA will suffer as a direct consequence.

The facts are plain to see.  There is a continuity of policy which occurs in every country infected by the fake democratic system, regardless of the results of elections.  A Conspiracy is by definition, a hidden plan.  The reasons for the move to a One World State are certainly hidden.  The endless warfare, and terrorism we are now living under, are leading to the destruction of all we hold dear.  Our standard of living is collapsing.  Unless we live in China, our countries produce nothing; in the case of China, the goods are mass produced substandard dross, produced by slaves.  This is the global reality.  We can use historical analysis to view this phenomenon as it has developed, but nowhere is there an open proposal for what is occurring.  There is, of course, the Protocols of Zion, which is automatically referred to as a fraudulent document, and a Conspiracy Theory.  The Protocols document is dismissed by many, solely by using the 'Conspiracy' label, but what is proposed a century ago, is now our reality.  A Conspiracy?  Certainly.  Therefore not worthy of study?  Certainly not!

The second part of the phrase Conspiracy Theory, is the word Theory.  What is a theory?  It is an idea which can be submitted to scrutiny.  Thus, the idea that there is a plan to destroy all freedom worldwide, and transfer all power and wealth to a controlling group of individuals motivated by economic factors, is a theory.  We can look into the economic activities in play around the globe, and ascertain that this is no pie-in-the-sky fantasy, but is verifiable.  If we look at the theory from a different angle, replacing the economic motive with an ethno-spiritual one, we can find by the names which recur in high finance, multi-national corporations, politics etc etc, that there is a disproportionate representation of people with ethnic loyalties to the Levite clan of Judah, albeit by proxy, through their own origins being more visibly Causcasian (Khazar).  The influence of Talmudic thought is very plain to see.

It takes diligent analysis of events to uncover the reality of a Conspiracy to achieve global power; or more accurately of competing and sometimes cooperating Conspiracies at work.  We then have to find out who is behind the Conspiracies, and if there is indeed a central Conspiracy guiding the others.  that is where the Theory come into play.

Why does any of this matter?  It matters, because the forces at work are still in the process of constructing their economic utopia, in which they own everything, and we exist to produce, consume, and serve them.  We have the opportunity of exposing the common enemy, and halting their utopia, which for us will be a Hell on Earth.  Certainly, there are some bizarre parts of the Conspiracy world, and most likely a considerable number of these have been engineered to associate genuine research with the rantings of the mentally ill.  The existence of so much disinformation does not in any way invalidate the genuine research; irritating though it may be.

If we can uncover who is behind the drive to a One World Slave State, and who is profiting by the economic rape of nations under the jackboot of NATO and the fake-Islamic footsoldiers, known as Al Qaeda, then we stand a better chance of awakening the people to the grim realities behind the façade of official politics, history and business.  By so doing, we may - just may - be in a position to collectively derail the international enemy, and to keep our own kin safe.  If we do nothing, and if we simply dismiss as a 'Conspiracy Theory', anything which does not fit into the kosher sanitised version of reality pumped out by the mendacious media, then we may as well throw up our hands in surrender, and accept our fate as slaves of the Global plantation - if we are allowed to survive long enough to become a part of it.

What does it matter if we are subjected to name-calling by those who are still sleep-walking towards their enslavement.  If we stay the course, those sleepwalkers may awaken, and join our ranks; if enough do so, we have a chance of retaking OUR world.  If we falter, they - and us -  are condemned to what the enemy is conspiring to inflict on all of us.

Nation Revisited: a site worth visiting

The international global plantation grows stronger by the day.  There are many voices shouting in warning about what is happening around the world, and about what is yet to come.  We are not short of questions regarding what is to be done to avert the coming tragedy.  Sadly, we are short of answers.

An interesting site which has only recently sprung forth onto the internet is Bill Baillies' Nation Revisited.  A harsh critic of 'conspiracy theorists', Bill Baillie has a view of our plight which does not see Jews responsible for our every woe.  Indeed, he points to the fact that of the ten richest people in the world, as listed by Forbes, nine are Gentiles.  

Nation Revisited is unapologetically written from a pan-Europeanist perspective.  Ideologically, NR makes no bones of following in the footsteps of Oswald Mosley's Union Movement.  The ideology of Oswald Mosley is not without problems; for example, Mosley infamously ordered his supporters to fight in the European war of suicide (1939-45).  However, that does not mean that everything from the Mosley era should be written off.

History is always presented in the light of the dogma of the ruling Establishment.  The plays of Shakespeare were in many ways so ridden with Tudor propaganda, that they hid the truth as well as the modern BBC.  It is with this in mind that sites such as Nation Revisited are worth viewing.  Our perception of the political movements of the twentieth century cannot but be coloured by the impact of sustained anti-European slander.  Where the NR site shines through is that it does not merely deal with historical phenomena, but addresses the issues of today.

Our problems are so severe, that we do ourselves no favours by restricting the information we allow ourselves to read.  Anyone who can contribute with proposals to help us in our struggle, is worthy of our attention.

To visit Nation Revisited, go to http://nationrevisited.blogspot.com

Anders Breivik: A Gift for Internationalism

As Anders Breivik begins his 21-year sentence for murdering 77 people in Oslo, in five-star luxury accommodation, what will be the repercussions for those who oppose the drive to a single global slave state?

Breivik has condemned all who oppose Internationalism, to be regarded as 'terrorists'.  His final words in court were:

"I would like to end with an expression of regret and apologise to militant nationalists in Norway and Europe.  I would like to apologise for not having killed more people”. 

In his final words, the man who is alleged to have single-handedly managed to bomb Oslo and gun down scores of people on a nearby island with no help, and no State orchestration (a near impossible feat), has handed the Internationalist enemy of humanity, a gold-plated gift.  By directly associating nationalism with murder, he has tarred all who stand for the restoration of national freedom as potential murderers.

Specifically, Breivik spoke of nationalists in Europe, thus narrowing the label of homicidal extremists to Europeans.  He could have left his fake apology as one to nationalists in general, thus including people such as the Black Panthers, Rastafari Movement, Free Tibet campaigners, Zionists fighting for a mono-ethnic Jewish-State, Albanian 'Kosovan' Statists, Turkish occupiers of Cyprus, Arab Libyan ethnic cleansers of Black Africans, South African ethnic cleansers of Europeans, Kurdistani home-rule activists, etc etc.  But no, he linked 'militant nationalism' exclusively with White Europeans. 

The Oslo tragedy was an internationalist-crafted massacre.  The whole affair reeks of Security Service involvement.  Breivik (and his unknown accomplices) butchered ordinary people, in order to bring the idea of opposition to the international order into disrepute.  Whether that opposition takes the form of States-Rights within the European Union, a campaign for the establishment of a single European nation for Europeans, a free nation of Kernow, or whatever, now thanks to Breivik (or more realistically, thanks to those who control him), all reasonable demands to take control of our own lives, and not be subject to the diktat of international finance and the will of multi-national corporations, have been forever libelled as expressions of hatred.  This will, of course, be interpreted in the USA to include those who believe in the US Constitution, as 'Breivik-like terrorists.

Interestingly, the trial in Oslo found Breivik to be sane.  Can we take this as acknowledging that a belief in Internationalism is the product of a diseased mind?  Or is this just an excuse to make anti-Internationalism (Nationalism, Patriotism, States' Rights etc) a criminal offence worldwide?

Breivik murdered more than the 77 victims of Oslo; he murdered freedom itself.  21 years in a prison which has better living conditions than most of us could ever achieve under the current economic climate, is an absolute disgrace.  His 'punishment' looks more like a reward for service to his masters.

Pussy Riot: The Shock Troupe of the Globalists

Amnesty International is championing the talentless 'punk' band Pussy Riot.  Why?  Because according to Amnesty, 'the three women are prisoners of conscience, sentenced solely for the peaceful expression of their views.'

Read that again.  According to Amnesty International, the three women who have been sentenced to two years in gaol, are 'prisoners of conscience'.  Their 'peaceful protest' involved the desecration of Christ the Saviour Cathedral, Moscow.  The well-orchestrated blasphemous attack upon the church was recorded by the media, as part of an ongoing campaign against the European nation of Russia, and the Russian Orthodox Church.  The trio should have been given sentences of seven years, but were allowed a reduced sentence by a lenient court, due to being parents.  Of course had they been men with children, that would not have been taken into account.

Link to Brother Kapnar's video exposing the Jews behind Pussy Riot: http://youtu.be/fnghY8Fol8s

If Pussy Riot had attacked a Synagogue, the media would be in uproar had they been given anything but the maximum sentence, and Amnesty International would have remained silent; much as they have done with the ever growing number of people in all European territories who have been imprisoned for questioning the Holyhoax, speaking out against the genocidal intent of the Talmud, or speaking out in defence of Christian or Muslim proscription of homosexuality and defence of morality.  Amnesty and the media are hypocrites who pick and choose who qualifies as a Prisoner of Conscience, solely on political grounds.  As a rule of thumb, if Amnesty support a cause, that cause is most likely Talmudic, Communist, Atheist, Homosexual, anti-Family, or in some other way Internationalist, Immoral and anti-Human.  

Pussy Riot is linked to a growing number of anti-Christian attacks in Europe.  Another group of so-called protesters, is FEMEN.  No doubt another group beloved of Amnesty, FEMEN used a chainsaw to cut down a Christian monument to the memory of the 7-10 million victims of the Holodomor, who were deliberately starved to death by the Talmudic rulers of Soviet-occupuied Ukraine.  Amnesty International would shriek hysterically if a monument to the Holyhoax was attacked, but they are silent with regards to the defamation of murdered Christian Europeans.  The Amnesty site does not even recognise the word 'holodomor'!  Should memebers of FEMEN be prosecuted, no doubt they will receive the backing of the international anti-humans.

Link to video of FEMEN's atrocity: http://youtu.be/rgdVWBz1yFw

Russia is under attack by the Cultural Marxism which the Talmudic regime exported from occupied Russia to the West.  The unity of Church and State, and the refusal of Russia to support the terrorist atrocities perpetrated by stooges of the West, against the people of Syria, Libya, Serbia et al, are the reasons why Russia is under attack.

Pussy Riot, FEMEN, Amnesty International, NATO, Al Qaeda, Wahhabism, Talmudism, the International Bankers and Multi-National Corporations etc are all working towards the same anti-human agenda.  The enemy of humanity comes in many forms, but the unity of purpose is plain for all to see.  Pussy Riot will likely be released early, which will be a victory of evil over the free nation of Russia.  Let Amnesty and their perverted supporters clamour for the release of Pussy Riot.  Let us shout louder for the lax two-year sentence to be over-turned and the full seven-year sentence imposed.

Stand by Russia.  Stand by all who believe in National Freedom

For more information on the decadent and degenerate antics of Pussy riot, visit the following link: http://mamba.ru/diary/post.phtml?user_id=464053379&post_id=449.  Beware though that the imagery is quite explicit.

Multi-Cultists are insane genocidal bigots

When I worked in the public service, I had a colleague who absolutely loathed Pakistanis (or Asians as the pc crowd insist on calling them).  To hide her hatred of all Pakistanis she did voluntary work with a Pakistani charity in the town where she lives.  To boast to her colleagues of just how politically correct she was (and presumably still is), she brought her paperwork in to work so that everyone could see how much she did for Pakistanis.  As is the way with the illiberal acolytes of the new religion of Political Correctness / Cultural Marxism, she could not heap enough praise on every culture she encountered; other than her own.  As a good 'liberal' she was the epitome of a self-hating gentile.  The poor self-deluded creature even took to wearing a sari to work.  

For all her self-debasement, and toadying to a culture not her own, on social occasions all it took was half a shandy and she would be more than eager to launch into tirades about how much she hated the people who had broken into her house, stalked her, threatened her children, and subjected her to all manner of suffering in order to 'encourage' her to sell her house to one of their kin.  Even whilst in full drunken flow, she could not see that it was people such as herself who created the multi-culti nightmare she herself was suffering from.  She would not admit that what she was experiencing was ethnic cleansing, and would rail against anyone who dared suggest such a thing.  When I last saw her, she was still bending over backwards to appease those who wish her ill.  Remarkably, she is still in the same house and will not budge.  That in itself is laudable, but why oh why, embrace the very multiculturalism responsible for her plight?  My former colleague was a perfect example of the cognitive dissonance experienced by the minority of those who embrace multiculturalism, yet still live in areas where they are a minority.  Perhaps suffering from Stockholm Syndrome may be a more apt description for such people.

A more common manifestation of the sickness of liberalism tends to be found amongst the hypocrites who live in areas almost entirely unspoilt by the culture destroyers of the anti-indigenous Establishment.  One only has to think of the small Yorkshire town of Hebden Bridge, nestling in the Pennines.  Although flanked to the west by the economically-devastated Lancashire town of Rochdale, and to the east by the heroin-ridden hell hole known to the locals as Halalifax(!), Hebden Bridge is almost entirely populated by indigenous English folk.  The town is home to a considerable number of white-flight Londoners, who fled the capital as soon as their neighbourhoods started to become over-run with newcomers.  One would imagine that having effectively been ethnically cleansed themselves, they would form a strong line of defence for the indigenous people and our culture.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  The liberal rats who pollute the Yorkshire air, are vehement campaigners against 'racism', and will not tolerate anyone who dares to question the wisdom of mass migration.  Unlike those who they deem to admonish for politically incorrect thoughts, these people have the luxury of being able to afford to move to another indigenous area from which to pontificate about the wonders of multiculturalism.  The liberal hypocrites who praise multiculturalism from a distance, are far worse than those who choose not to see the reasons why they struggle to cope with life inside areas impacted by the international disease.

It is a mistake to blame the deliberate destruction of our culture on the new arrivals to our lands.  A feature of the capitalist system is mass unemployment.  In a healthy and sane economy based upon Social Justice, employment and production are tailored to maximise the living standards of the people; the economy of the UK is clearly based upon Social Injustice.  The international order which exists in microcosm within the UK, is structured around the ethos of transferring wealth from the majority of the people to the ruling minority.  In order to keep profits at a maximum, wages must be held down to the minimum practicable level. It is for this reason that mass unemployment is necessary; afterall, the last thing that the rulers wish to have is a population which is able to demand wages sufficient to live at a level other than borderline poverty.  

The UK system of exploitation by unscrupulous and faceless bureaucratic directors of commerce, needs a scapegoat for the economic hardship it causes; a highly visible, culturally distinct, non-indigenous population provides such a scapegoat; especially when legislation is enacted to give such people priority in work, and freedom from criticism of any aspect of their lifestyles.  In order to encourage people from other lands to migrate to ours in search of work and a better standard of living, 'our' Establishment has waged economic and military wars across the globe to destabilise entire countries.  Having had their homelands destroyed, the people are then invited to take refuge in the UK by the very regimes which made life in their own lands intollerable.  War is very profitable, and it is also a good way to transfer people across the globe in order to destroy cultural and ethnic homogeneity.  The people who move around the world are a symptom of the international financiers' criminal network; they are victims of the same culture destroyers who have ruined our lands.

The liberals who fight against what they call racism, are unwittingly a part of the reason for racial conflict.  I wholeheartedly agree that it is wrong to see people only in terms of their skin colour, or faith.  However, it is equally wrong to deny that there is a beauty which exists within the distinct ethnic groups.  Those who like to shout racial epithets, but do not care to consider why vast numbers of people from other lands have come to our shores, only serve to keep the current system in place.  It is absolutely vital that we see beyond the cultural conflicts within our borders, and appreciate that every culture is sacred, and that every people is worthy of life.  In order to protect the sanctity of culture, faith and ethnic origins, it is of paramount importance that all nations be allowed to live in their own way, free from outside interference.

Liberals and other multi-cultists are obsessed with 'racism', but what is it that so preoccupies them?  If, as liberals claim, 'racism' is the judging of people according to their race, then the liberals themselves are the most racist people on the planet.  Not only do they hate their own people, solely because they have White skin and European ancestry, but they ardently support the idea of multiculturalism, which in its essence requires the mixing of the races, until there is but one uniform race of indistinguishable people.  This would mean that there would be no Whites, no Blacks, no Arabs, no Turks, no Chinese etc etc; only a mass of people who could not claim any link to any heritage.  There is another word for this; it is genocide.

Liberalism is racism.  It is a belief that no distinct races should exist; it is a hatred of all which anchors the people spiritually and culturally; it is a failure to identify with nation and with pride in the ancestors.  Liberalism is vital for the globalist agenda of reducing humanity to rootless, spiritually dead, materialistic producer-consumers; it is the driving force for global slavery.  Liberalism is the communitarian basis of both the despotism of Finance Capitalism and the servitude of Communism.

In the UK and many land wracked by multiculturalism, those who believe in a free world of independent nations, are labelled as haters.  In truth we love our own people, to the point where we are able to see patterns emerging globally which are damaging to every people.  Unlike the multi-cultists who fear a world of divergent ideas, differing economic models, competing faiths etc, those who are slandered as haters, really are at the forefront of a defence of the diversity of humanity.  We are not scared of that which we do not understand; we are not threatened by that which we cannot control - these are the characteristics of the liberal mindset, which seeks to hide behind the buzzwords of tolerance and equality, whilst actively fighting to destroy everything which makes life worth living.

A free world, in which the people can come and go as visitors to far off lands, to enjoy the rich cultures and traditions which the world has to offer, can only exist if those lands exist; and the lands are nothing unless they belong solely to their own people, and vice versa.  If the multi-culti sickness is not rooted out and destroyed, the world will be one bland labour camp; a sweatshop modelled on the slavery of Communitarian China.  When that point is reached, there will be no wage bargaining, and unemployment will be dealt with in the manner of a capital offence.

Next time a liberal has the audacity to call you a bigot, remember that the liberal ideology is a cover for a depth of self-hatred which will not be satisfied until ethnic genocide has been achieved worldwide, and those who shuffle to the sweat shops are human in name only.  It is time to let the bigots know that we can see through their delusions, and that we are not going to indulge their madness anymore.

Heroin Production in Afghanistan