The Jimmy Savile scandal which finally broke into the public arena recently was a white wash to draw attention away from the pædophiles in the fraudulent puppet government and the real Establishment which controls the country. A handful of 'celebrities' were thrust into the spotlight in order to take attention away from the people who hold power over us; the people who rape us economically every day, and who have amongst them literal rapists who prey on children and those who cannot defend themselves.
Is it unfair to accuse the men and women of the law of wrong-doings? Not at all. In a district of the metropolitan area of the West Riding, there is a woman who is living on welfare benefits, but always has designer clothes, and drives a very expensive car. She has a daughter who dresses in clothes which would suit a red light district, but are not appropriate for a primary school child. The woman is a prostitute. She has a constant flow of customers to her home, mostly Pakistani men, but also a good number of White skinheads. Everyone knows that she is a whore and that she is prostituting her daughter, but the police will do nothing about this. Why? Could it be because her father is a serving police officer, and that the skinheads who visit are his colleagues? The rot in the police is astounding, but then considering that they are the militia of the Establishment, not surprising.
The politically correct shock troops of the Establishment proved absolutely useless in stopping Savile destroying children over several decades, but they are ruthlessly efficient in ensuring pædophiles and rapists are allowed to hide their atrocities from the public. In my own area, there is a pædophile who routinely goes to a public park full of children. The police have installed CCTV on his house and have regular patrols due to his presence. These are not to ensure that our children are safe from this monster, but to ensure that he does not meet with an accident which would end his perversion forever. Our children are not safe to play in their own streets and parks, but the pædophile is well protected.
"Some girls more mature more quickly than others, and some teenage girls are anything but wallflowers...The UK has the one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancy in
Europe, and most underage sexual activity is with other teens. As the
recent Asian procuring cases such as those in Rochdale show, the
existing age of consent doesn’t appear to deter really nasty predatory
behavior, though such extreme cases are atypical."
Hewsons mentality is not untypical of those in the legal system. She does not question why children feel they must have sex at ever younger ages, not for a moment considering the negative impact of the fashion industry, television and above all pop music, which teaches children that promiscuity is a sign of maturity, and that celibacy is old-fashioned and uncool. She does not consider that the promotion of sex in sex education classes is of the 'monkey see monkey do' category, and that the constant promotion of 'experimenting' with same sex relationships, miscegenation and all other politically correct dogma only exacerbates this. Rather than suggesting the age of consent be lowered, the responsible attitude is to demand it be raised back to 21, and that those who offend be punished with the full force of the law, up to and including with the death penalty. The wishy-washy libertine attitude of Hewson is indicative of the degeneracy of the UK legal system as a whole.
'It is not inappropriate, perhaps, in view of the puerility of this type of behaviour, to compare it rather to a schoolboy collecting cigarette cards in olden times,
because the duplicates were handed on to other adults, three of four of
them only, who were likewise minded to indulge in this sort of
puerility. To that extent the distribution was by no means of the most
vicious sort...It is perfectly plain from those, (the testimonials read out about Brooke) that we are dealing here with someone who, apart from these offences, was an unusually fine man.'
To the second highest judge in the UK, the procuring, duplication and distribution of child pornography is comparable with the collection of cigarette cards, and the man brought before him is a perfect gentleman (apart from his proclivity for sexually desiring children!) This was not a recent case, which shews that the arrogance of those who consider themselves better than the rest of us, and thus having some God-given right to tell us how to think and act, is far from new.
This week the artist, Graham Ovenden, was found guilty of child abuse by Plymouth Crown Court. Commenting that the artist had suffered a blow top his reputation, the judge in Plymouth gave Ovenden a suspended sentence, meaning that he has not been punished at all. Clearly the abuse of children doesn't matter to those in high places.
It is not solely young girls who are preyed upon by the scum in this country. Men and boys are equally endangered by the corrupt and degenerate misrulers of the UK. The Deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, Nigel Evans, has been implicated in the rape of men. He is still a serving Member of Parliament, still taking his wage from the taxpayer, and still at liberty. The accusation of rape is clearly not of great importance in Westminster.
The homosexual rights advocate Peter Tatchell was lambasted for suggesting that the age of consent be lowered to 14. However, to take the time to read what he actually suggested rather than to take a reactionary position based on hearsay, Tatchell argued for an end to the prosecution of 14 to 16 year olds who have sex with people of a similar age group, differing by no more than three years and not falling under the age of 14. Children should not be having sex at 14, and those who wield influence such as Peter Tatchell, should use their influence to discourage it. However, Tatchell's argument is far more acceptable than that of Barbara Hewson who has no problem with old men having sex with 13 year olds; it is far more acceptable than Lord Lane's view that child pornography is just a hobby and is harmless; it is far more acceptable than the attitude of the police in letting people who have been convicted of child abuse have their names removed from the Sex Offenders' Register and continue to pursue children. It is a strange world we live in when Peter Tatchell can be considered as the voice of reason and moderation!
The UK is an occupied nation, ruled over by people who have no right to hold any positions of authority in our lands. The systematic abuse of children in the 'care' system is well known, and continues. Children are bombarded with pornography by the media, the school system, and every other area under the control of the Establishment; they are made to feel that they must be sexually active, and preferably to be so in a multicultural and multisexual manner.
The UK is a sick land, ruled over by degenerates who are evil, pure and simple. There can be no reforming our enemies; no rehabilitation of those who destroy our young. They must be rooted out and destroyed - to the last man and woman who has been involved in the abuse of children (whether directly or through the media, education etc), or has protected them through the legal system. Wearing a police uniform or a judge's ridiculous wig is no defence and will in no way keep these despicable beasts free from natural justice when it catches up with them - which it will.












