Uniting the Resistance.

As the global enemy advance, more and more people are waking up to the diabolical game being played out, with us as the victims and in too many cases as the pawns.  The awakening of the people should be something to rejoice in.  However, the Establishment has very little to worry about, as far from being a unified force to reckon with, the Resistance is fragmented to the point of absurdity and not only this, it is wracked with in-fighting and ego-centrism which negates any chance of overthrowing our mortal foes.

In the UK, the media is so hysterically multiculti that anyone who doesn't go all out to praise immigration, homosexuality, pædophilia, abortion, miscegenation etc etc, is labelled as 'right wing', and thus automatically as evil. The imbecile public then refuse to vote for anyone 'right wing' as we all know that right wing means Nazi and Nazi means Gas Chambers!! The parties thus labelled (or perhaps more accurately, libeled) do not help themselves either - they bicker over the minutest details of policy and make a point of standing against one another. The bemused member of the public then has a choice of several parties who are to the uninitiated, pretty much the same. The result is the splitting of the anti-Establishment vote, with each party donating £1000 per seat contested, to the enemy for the privilege of playing a game that they cannot win!

The Establishment doesn't leave anything to chance though, as entire parties are created to take protest votes. UKIP only did so well in the EU elections due to being a part of the Establishment, wholly controlled by the eternal enemy.  UKIP cannot be counted as part of the Resistance any more than the kosher collaborators of the EDL can.  The general public see UKIP as their saviours, with some seeing them as the party which will first liberate us from the EU, then ultimately free us from the immigrant invaders who have been used as foot-soldiers in a war to destroy our culture and our very gene pool.  They will be sorely disappointed when UKIP fails to fulfill either of these hopes.

Democracy is a sham and it always has been. It is a puppet show which we should steer clear of.  Democracy is a tool for the implementation of communism/liberalism (same thing), as it treats everyone as the same, regardless of race, sex, intelligence, age, experience etc.   Participation gives the charade legitimacy.  

A 16 year old paki-stani rapist who wants Shariah Law, who by virtue of liberal lunacy has just come to live in Scotland and has no knowledge of the Culture, Language, History or Traditions of the UK and/or Scotland, has the same voting power in the forth-coming referendum of splitting from England, as a 70 year old Scotsman who has worked his entire life to build the country.  This is clearly not right, but it is the essence of democracy; a fraudulent farce with all the sophistication of a daytime television programme; a pathetic marketing ploy to convince the people that the placing of a cross on a ballot paper will grant them their every whim - just so long as their whims are halal/kosher-certified.

Joseph Stalin best summed up the reality of the democratic system when he made the following statements:

• I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.

Stalin may have been speaking about elections within the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, but the futility of elections in the representative system is obvious for those who care to examine the nature of the system.  In the UK, as with most European countries (if not all), all parties and individuals who progress within the system, do so only because the views they air are tolerated by the legal-political-economic Establishment.  Anyone who strays from the 'politically correct' path, faces public censure by the controlled media (quite possibly for the sake of appearances in the case of controlled opposition such as the EDL and UKIP), or imprisonment ( and worse) if they go too far out of the acceptable sphere and really will not play the game. 

• Ideas are more powerful than Guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? 

Now the second quote by Joseph Stalin encapsulates the entire modus operandi of the democratic state.  The people are presented with false choices which may appear real enough, but do not stand up to scrutiny.  In the UK the major parties will promise almost anything which they believe the people will want.  If the people wish to leave the EU, they will promise a referendum; knowing full well that they cannot deliver it due to changes at European level which will make exit from the EU impossible by the time they propose to hold it.  Of course when the people want Muslim rapists and Jewish financiers to be expelled from the country and never let back in, the job of offering such policies is handed over to the myriad 'nationalist' parties, the majority of which are controlled by the State to some degree and are merely acting as proxies. 

The way in which the parties which officially stand outside the Establishment are controlled, is through division and pandering to an obsession with ideological minutiae.  In the 1970s the UK had a nationalist party known as the National Front, which had mass membership and began to believe that it had a chance of gaining control of the nation through general elections.  The NF vote was all-but wiped out by a sleight of hand of the Establishment, which employed the full power of the media to convey the impression that the Conservative Party under Margaret Thatcher would stop immigration and start repatriation of non-Europeans. 

The 1979 General Election pledges of the Conservatives were shame-faced lies; the party not only failed to repatriate anyone, it enacted policies which increased immigration; policies which have been ratcheted up by every government of every hue ever since.  Not content with taking vast amounts of money from the NF membership in election deposits for the 303 seats which were contested (every single deposit was lost), the powers-that-be ensured that a post-election NF would not be in a position to find a better strategy than fighting at national level; infiltrators and ne'er do wells split the NF, with the formation of a succession of rival organisations, including the now notoriously kosher, BNP.

The National Front went from being one of the largest Nationalist organisations in Europe, to a very small organisation indeed.  Internal splits caused by outside (State-controlled) trouble-makers, alongside egomania from people who should have known better, saw the creation of numerous organisations, some of which stumble on to this day.  The National Front achieved a degree of ideological purity which was truly astounding.  For anyone who wishes to understand the absolute essence of the National struggle, one can do no better than read the NF publications, Nationalism Today and New Nation.  

Having achieved an ideology which was based on self-reliance, love of own (rather than hatred of others), tradition and respect, further in-fighting saw the great advances lost as the ITP split off and the minute National Front renamed itself the Third Way and shifted headlong into becoming precisely the kosher liberal entity which the NF had campaigned against.  The Third Way name has since been changed again to the National Liberal Party.  Those who call themselves the NF today come from factions who split from the NF in the 1980s; the NLP is the NF in its current phase.  The multi-culti, wishy-washy pro-homosexual, pro-Jewish, pro-immigrant NLP may seem a long way from the NF of the 1960s, but it is a logical result of the politics of the ego over the needs of the people.

We who proclaim our lofty ideals and our commitment to our people, are our own worst enemies.  We allow ourselves to be swayed by personalities and to become obsessed with tittle tattle about our alleged rivals.  Just as the NF split itself into near oblivion, with what is left of it becoming a liberal disgrace, the fracturing of the 'nationalist' movement continues apace.  People who are allegedly on our side, spend more time back-biting and spreading malicious gossip about one another than they do promoting the cause.  When they do promote the cause, it is to promote their particular faction and to denigrate others - recruiting from rival organisations rather than getting new blood involved.  I find the lunacy of it all, breath-taking.

If there is one thing the British people are very good at, it is not learning from the mistakes of the past. Once again, in the UK, there are two organisations which call themselves the National Front (perhaps imagining that resurrecting a name discarded by a now openly multiracial organisation would inspire the British people). The inability to unite within the same organisation is astonishing when one considers that both NFs have the same policies, same symbols, claim the same heritage and except for the people leading them,  are the same!  One would have hoped that having seen the largest nationalist organisation in Europe shattered to the point that every egomaniac in the movement had his own little fiefdom, the focus of the post NF world would have been unity of purpose, if not of organisation.  Nothing could be further from the truth. 

As if to prove that the anti-Globalist movement in the UK really is (to paraphrase Mussolini), Lions led by Donkeys, there are a wealth of rival factions in the nationalist arena,  all of which spend more time and effort trying to poach members from one another, than trying to save the nation.  The many groups include the BNP, British Movement, Racial Volunteer Force, British Freedom Fighters, NF (London-based), NF (Hull-based), National Action, Britain First, England First, British Democratic Party, English Democrats, Harmony Party, British Resistance, Liberty GB, Western Spring, the various Defence Leagues and Infidels, League of Saint George, and many others besides.  These do not include the likes of UKIP and NO2EU which are labelled by the media as sitting alongside the anti-Establishment groups, and seen to be by the electorate.  When the rival factions make their mutual hostility public by standing against one another in elections (often with literature pointing out real (or made-up) flaws), is it any wonder that the electorate find the whole fiasco confusing and irritating?

Standing against one another dilutes the vote, as those who oppose the Establishment parties find themselves confronted by parties who they would vote for, which differ only by name rather than any important policy.  Many people who would vote for an anti-Establishment party realise that to do so would be pointless.  They then either vote for one of the Establishment parties (hoping to elect the lesser evil) or do not vote at all.  As a result, the rival factions lose their deposits (effectively contributing to the coffers of the Establishment) and promote the image of weakness in the movement and an inability to rise above petty differences and personality issues; both of which, sadly, are true.  The obsession with only dealing with 'our own' insofar as already active members is concerned, coupled with hostility to the same people because of different factional labels, is our downfall.  It has to end if we are to avoid total genocide. 

The people do not care about the label used by the party which will deliver a freedom from the EU, repatriation of non-Europeans, end of rule by the Bankers, a restoration of British Industry etc etc.  The people only care about the policies.  So much could be achieved if the rival factions would only agree to stop fighting one another and to at least unite on single issues when given the opportunity.  Right now, the people of Scotland (and a good many foreigners who have no right to be there anyway) are being asked to decide if Scotland should remain in the UK, or split off and become a different slave state of the EU ruled by the same Jewish money power and multi-culti traitors, just with a different local administration centre independent.  Are those who support the Union putting differences aside on a simple yes/no vote?  Are those who support Scottish nationhood (and by extension English nationhood) putting their differences aside? Unsurprisingly, in both cases, they are not.  If we cannot unite under even these simplest circumstances, when can we?

We need some form of Nationalist Council to allow all the would-be fuhrers the space to be kings of their own castles, whilst avoiding confrontation with others.  Whether this can be achieved is debatable, but something needs to be done.  The Greek anti-Capitalists of the left wing variety were similarly fragmented before they had the wisdom to form the Coalition of the Radical Left (Syriza).  Rather than competing as thirteen rival factions, they united behind a common banner whilst maintaining independence as individual organisations.  The wisdom of abandoning this independence remains to be seen, but the initial ethos of Syriza worked.  Can we not do something similar ourselves?  Isn't this better than financially feeding the Establishment whilst watching our nation die through failure to get beyond personality issues and egomania?

To quote (again) Joseph Stalin (no I'm not a Stalinist, I just appreciate the wisdom in these selected quotes),

• We think that a powerful and vigorous movement is impossible without differences — "true conformity" is possible only in the cemetery.  

We don't have to like Stalin to know that there is much truth in these words.  Let us indulge our differences and find a way which allows our differences of thought to flourish, but not to become justification for fighting one another as the real enemy wipes the floor with all of us and our people cease to exist. 

Grooming? No, the word is Rape.

Over the last week, the Hull-based faction of the NF, the BNP, the EDL and Britain First have all been active in Rotherham, protesting against the over 1400 known rapes of indigenous English girls at the hands of Paki-stani moslems in just one moderately sized English town.  The number of victims across the country must be truly staggering, but Rotherham has become the focus of protests due to the number of admitted victims, whereas in the rest of the country, the cover-ups are still in full force.

Whilst it is good to see so many groups taking a stand against the vile and inexcusable destruction of childhood through rape, there are two problems with the ongoing protests - firstly, the number of groups involved highlights the futile divisions in the 'nationalist' movement; secondly the use of the euphemism 'grooming' legitimises a word which should not be used by anyone in this context.

The word 'grooming' has become the favoured euphemism of the Establishment.  The use of the term by 'nationalists' and other anti-pædophile activists is disturbing.  Grooming can be applied to animals (most obviously horses) to refer to a process of making them clean; grooming when applied to a person is anything which makes an individual better as a human being.  Thus a man may employ grooming as a means of making himself more presentable - such as being clean - or he may be groomed for advancement in society or employment by learning skills which make him a better individual; one worthy of attaining a higher status.  To employ the word 'grooming' to our children in connection with their rape at the hands of paki-stani pædophiles is abhorrent.

Are White girls dirty and inferior to pakis-tani men?  Does the act of rape improve these girls?  Being filled with the semen of multiple paki-stani men, to the point where of the 1400 admitted victims of moslem rape gangs in Rotherham, over 100 mongrel bastards were produced as a result - does that give the victims of gang-rape a higher status?  Presumably destroying the White genepool is a positive thing if this is the case; this is something the multicultists clearly applaud, but for 'nationalists' to use such terminology without thinking about what they are actually saying, is unacceptable.

Rotherham isn't a particularly large town, nor is it especially infested with pakis-tanis and other moslem rapists.  The Rotherham metropolitan area is comparable with the metropolitan boroughs and districts centred on Oldham, Rochdale, Halifax, Burnley, Blackburn and scores of other towns which are drowning in a sea of islamic invasion.  Rotherham is a lot smaller than areas such as Bradford which have been all but lost to the invaders; of course many of the boroughs in London dwarf the areas subjected to colonisation in the Pennine areas of Yorkshire and Lancashire, in terms of the sheer numbers of invaders there. 

There have been 1400 admitted rape victims in Rotherham alone; the number of victims across the UK must be phenomenal.  We must not forget that the UK is not the only country which is being destroyed by design.  The Netherlands, Belgium, France and Sweden are known to be in a worse condition than the UK.  The entire Serbian territory of Kosovo has been taken over by Albanian (Turkish) filth.  The scum in Bruxelles are even now engineering the entry of Turkey and the arab states of north Africa into the EU  The entire European Union is being colonised by our enemies, with the full blessing of our greater enemies; the Jewish-controlled Establishment.  Europe outside the EU is suffering a similar fate, with invasion underway as far away as Australasia.  This is invasion with purpose; the purpose is the annihilation of the European race.

To speak of 'grooming' is to use the language of the enemy; it is also to focus upon a symptom of the problems facing Europe, not the cause.  Those who chant 'hang pædophiles' unwittingly create the image of 'good colonisers' versus 'bad colonisers'.  There is no such thing as a good immigrant; every last one of them has broken into our homeland legally or otherwise, and added to the drain on our NHS, housing stock, energy and utility supplies, agricultural land etc.  Every last one of them has weakened our culture by bringing their divisive ways (diversity is division); has undermined our legal system by justifying legislation for the protection promotion of foreigners; has added to the suffering of our animals by bringing in superstitious drivel which goes against the indigenous love of animals which we were rightly proud of before we submitted to halal and kosher in our schools, supermarkets and elsewhere.

Rather than focus upon the rape of our children in Rotherham to the exclusion of all other offences against our people, the consistent message must be that all non-Europeans (by blood, not by pointless legal documents) and those who breed with them by choice or are products of miscegenation by any means, must be deported and never allowed to return.  To achieve this means going beyond the horrific creatures who worship allah Satan to the source of multiculturalism; the Elders of Jewry and their collaborators of every race.

We must stop using the term 'grooming' and call it what it is: RAPE.  We must stop playing the 'good immigrunt, bad immigrunt' game and call them what they are; parasites.  To stop the continued destruction of our people requires that we make no distinction between Jews and Muslims, immigrants who profess the desire to assimilate and those who seek to overthrow our way of life and openly speak of our destruction.  All of them must be expelled from Europe, and should they resist, then actions beyond marching through our streets with pretty banners, will be required.  Asking parasites to politely stop feeding on the host never works.

Right now, our people are focused upon the Moslem cancer yet they are ignorant to the Jewish one from which it sprang.  If we cut out one cancer and leave the other intact, we will still die.  We have to cut out all the cancers in our national body.  Polite protests are not enough.  We need action and we need action now.

Death is not the end. Our Struggle is Eternal

The death of a loved-one is never easy.  It is that much harder when the one you lose suffers excruciating pain before death.  This month has been a particularly difficult one, with the loss of a confidant, a listener, an individual who was forthright yet compassionate, took no nonsense but wasn't patronising, and was in every way a kindred spirit.  Due to the nature of my writing, I cannot give the name or any other details of the great individual who has departed this world.  Why not?  Because to do so would put the rest of my family in danger due to the malicious behaviour of those who promote the genocide of the European nation, under the lie of multiculturalism.

This month has been a month of caring for a dying loved-one, who died in my arms.  I have been focussed upon my kin to the exclusion of all other matters.  There are people who I have been helping with various issues, who I have not been able to help due to my immediate family needing my absolute attention - I will endeavour to resume my help now that I am able to.  

The loss of a loved-one puts everything into perspective.  For me, the departure of someone who means so much to me, is obviously a time of great sadness, but it is also a reminder of just how little time we have in this world, and of how we must strive to not waste a moment of our precious time here. 

We are but links in a chain which stretches from our most ancient ancestors until the last of our kin yet to come.  We owe it to those who have come before us - and to those who we have lost - to ensure that we live our lives in ways which honour their memory.  The best way to do this is to ensure we do our utmost to protect our bloodlines from contamination by the forces which seek to mongrelise us and make us slaves to the international enemy.

We are more than our physical bodies.  We are spiritual beings.  Our bodies are but vessels for us to operate in the physical realm.  New-agers and internationalists deny the differences in the races, either through ignorance of biology or as a part of an agenda to reduce the world to a global slave state with one set of racially-identifiable overlords, and a mass of identity-less semi-humans who are fit only to serve them.  

Carl Gustav Jung wrote of the unity of the race and the soul of the individual.  A mongrelised mass would thus be a truly inhuman mass with the vessels being unfit for the occupation by the higher beings beyond the physical realm.  Our distinct races exist as distinct vessels which can only be operated by our distinct collective racial souls.  There are many theories about what happens to our inner selves after we depart this realm.  If we return to another physical body, it can only be one which is the same racially as that which it left.  Mongrelised bodies must either be schizophrenic prisons for multiple souls, or they must be voids working as automatons which really are not fit to be classed as human.  To look at the incidence of mental illness in those of mixed-race, is to find support for the view that mixed-race bodies are torture chambers for those trapped within them.  We cannot allow our kin to return to vessels which have been turned from vessels of purity and beauty into things of woe and of pain, shared by others who are equally tortured.

 I dedicate this article - and indeed this blog - to the memory of an individual who has brought me inspiration, much needed counsel and much joy.  Should we one day be reunited, I wish to be able to hold my head up with the confidence that our temporary parting is one which has not dented my conviction that the fight against our enemies must be fought to the fullest; nay, which has given me a deeper conviction that for the sake of those now gone as well as those yet to come, we must be victorious in our struggle.  To believe anything less would be an act of betrayal and to shatter the fragile chain which keeps us out of the clutches of those who seek to destroy all which is worthy of calling life.

Europeans crying for our enemies. What is wrong with us?

As I write these words, terrible suffering is underway; human beings are being slaughtered in massive numbers; lives are being destroyed.  The tragedy I speak of is the massacre of Europeans in the Ukraine.  This horrific crime against ordinary people has gained attention from time-to-time, but it has not become the focus of mass protests, with Europe-wide calls for 'something to be done' to stop the destruction of our European kin.  Why not?  Because Europeans being murdered in Europe for the benefit of global finance, simply isn't considered important to the liberal bigots - unless of course the suffering can be manipulated to justify killing even more of our people!

Contrast the lack of interest in the destruction of the Ukraine, with the hysteria from the liberal self-haters when it comes to moaning about ongoing bloodshed in Asia.  The butchery of Syria and Iraq were deliberately created in order to destroy strong nations, thus allowing for their exploitation and the enrichment of multi-national corporations.  The barbarism unleashed by the destabilisation of the region has destroyed many thousands of lives - and with the emergence of ISIL/ISIS, this descent into primitive brutality can only be expected to grow.  The liberal bigots seem quite happy to go along with those who created this horror, by calling for the end of legitimate rule in Syria, and by repeating the official mantra that however bad things are in Iraq, it is better than had Saddam Hussain remained.  The ability of liberals to cry for one set of civilians over another, whilst simultaneously believing they are opposing despotism by supporting it in a different form, is truly astounding.

In Africa there is a great deal of bloodshed, but no-one even acknowledges it.  The liberal rent-a-mob 'Stop the War Coalition' (a front for the MI5 operation, the SWP) don't bother with the outrages in Africa unless they can blame Europeans for them, so when it is Africans killing Africans (and especially when global finance gains from the carnage), the blood spilled doesn't matter to the hypocrites of the STWC/SWP.

One particular conflict which has really got the liberal idiots excited, is the current Israeli actions in the Gaza strip.  Interestingly, the 'far-right' and 'far-left' both have taken up the cause of the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians, although they support the Arabs for very different reasons.

To the Left (which in the UK includes those who use the term liberal), the refusal of Israel to allow itself to become a mongrelised multi-culti sewer, is reason enough to hate that nation.  The one-worlders are so debased and so obsessed with destroying their own people that they cannot tolerate any people defending itself.  It is perhaps one of the greatest ironies of the degenerate multi-culti European nightmare, that our present plight was engineered by diaspora Jews, who have been so successful in wrecking our lands, that attention has now turned to theirs.  By 'theirs' I naturally mean theirs by occupation (in much the same way as 'theft by finding' or 'squatters rights', but be that as it may, the simple act of defending the land one occupies, rather than opening one's borders to invasion, is enough to raise the ire of the liberal multi-cultists and their associated globalisers.

To the Right, the support for Gaza comes as a knee-jerk reaction to the fact that it is Israel  which is fighting there.  The hatred of Israel comes from a deep understanding of the Judaic nature of those who have brought about our downfall.  It is very much understandable that people who have been so very seriously harmed by Organised Jewry and the lies of the Holyhoax, should take pleasure from the problems facing Israel.  At an emotional level, the need for revenge for the evils of multi-culturalism, mass non-European Immigration, Capitalism, Globalism etc etc etc, are wholly supportable.  However, as the hostility to the concept of the Jewish State is borne of emotion, it tends to cloud the judgement of those who seek the best for their own people.  It is  right to oppose the machinations of the Jews in the diaspora and those in Israel who pull their strings, but to allow oneself to be ruled by emotion is a mistake.  The power of the diaspora must end, but that will be much harder if the Jewish State comes to an end and the diaspora becomes the norm.

The Third Position on Gaza is also in favour of the Palestinians.  This is not due to hatred of Jews or to a love of multi-culturalism, but rather due to a sense of fairness.  If we are to call for an end of the occupation of our lands by foreigners who have no business here, then we must defend the Palestinians who have had their lands stolen by the people who call themselves Israelis.  This position is reasonable and logical.  How can anyone argue for his own freedom, yet deny the freedom of another?  The Third Position on 'Palestine' has the unfortunate impact of weakening the Jewish State and thereby increasing the chance of the State failing.  The argument is based upon the premise that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, and that the sacred bond of Blood and Soil must be protected.  Herein lies the whole crux of the Palestine-Israel problem.

In ancient times, the land upon which Israel rests was considered the Holy Land.  Jews, Moslems and Christians still see the territory as sacred. Taking the side of the Palestinians is to support their assertion that the land belongs to Islam.  Taking the side of Israel is to support their assertion that the land belongs to Judaism.  There is an alternative view, which is that the land belongs to the true Israelites, who are not the modern Jews, but rather are the Anglo Saxons of Northwest Europe.  The Israelite claim is also taken up by Ethiopians who claim that Blacks are the real Israelites and the Khazar/Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews are imposters.   Every point is problematic, and can be argued point-by-point by those who have religious axes to grind. 

If we consider the Palestine-Israel issue according to the unity of Blood and Soil, then the claims to the territory are thus:

• Palestine is an Arab land and the Jews stole it in 1948 by means of mass immigration and colonisation, much as the Pakistanis are doing in England.
• Israel is the home of the Jewish people who are its rightful owners due to being there 2000 years ago.

So which story is true?

Palestine is the name used to designate the Arabs living in the disputed land. This is a modern usage of the name, which is highly political.  Until the creation of Israel, Palestine was a term often used to refer to the Jews living in the region.  Under the British Mandate, the west of the Transjordan region was known as Palestine.  Prior to this Palestine was used to denote the land south of Syria in the Middle East.  Clearly the name is not without problems.

Palestine in its earliest use referred to the land inhabited by the Philistines.  The racially-observant Biblical texts have accustomed us to viewing the Philistines as uncultured peoples.  However, this isn't so.  The Philistines were uncircumcised people from the Greek islands - they were Europeans who were slandered in religious texts because they were not Jewish in race or religion - being rather, Europeans who worshiped the fish god, Dagon.  The name Philistine became mutated into Palestine over time (as is to be expected).  The original Palestinians were Greeks, not Arabs, not Semites, not Jews.

The term Israel is used to refer to the ancient Kingdom of the same name, to a people who claim to have been granted the land by their deity.  Obviously this is impossible to verify or refute and is a matter of religious faith.  Interestingly, the 'Children of Israel' is not a straight forward definition.  The muddling of the terms Jews and Israel has caused this confusion.

The Israelites and the Jews were not one and the same.  If the name chosen for the Jewish State had been Judea, then there would be no need to debate the issue - the land of Judea (now in the disputed West Bank) can be confirmed as Jewish for thousands of years, and the larger cities in the Gaza Strip were heavily-populated by Jews until recent times when they were taken over by mass Arab immigration.  The name Israel, however, gives legitimacy to a claim that the land belongs to those who rejected Judaism and held on to the Israelite religion, which became Christianity.  It is amusing to note that if Israel should be the exclusive land of the Israelites, then that would mean that there is no place there for the Moslem migrants or for the Jews who rejected the Second Covenant of Israel.

Logically then, as Palestine was the land of European Philistines, and as the name Israel relates to a people who migrated to the west, leaving the anti-Israelite Jews behind, the whole of modern Israel can be claimed spiritually and racially by Europeans!  Should we then argue that all the Jews AND the Moslems get out of that territory and 'return' it to Europe?  It is a logical argument, but an academic one not worthy of seriously pursuing.

It can be seen that the Jewish claims to Israel can be demolished just as easily as the Arab ones, but equally can be supported by those who are partisan.  This leaves a further question:  Does it serve the interests of Europeans better if there is a strong Jewish State and no Palestine, if there is a weak Jewish State and a limited Palestine, or if there is no Jewish State and a unified Moslem world across the south and east of the Mediterranean (the third option coming automatically as a result of the second)?

As Europeans, we need to think of what is best for us.  If Israel is weakened, or ceases to be, then what will become of the Jewish people?  They will come flooding back across the Mediterranean, claiming a right to abode in Europe because their ancestors happened to be here for some time.  They will use every slur in the book, such as the Holyhoax and the oft used weapon of accusing of anti-Semitism those who do not wish to be ruled by Jews.  They will bring with them a renewed hatred of the Goyim for encouraging the Arab takeover of Israel; a hatred which will surely see the destruction of Europe by multi-cultists accelerated.

To the 'National Socialists', 'anti-Semites', 'Identity Christians' and others who can see the hidden Jewish hand behind liberalism and 'political correctness', I ask you, if you can see the harm inflicted on Europe by those with the Jewish mindset, then surely the solution to all our woes is to end their presence here?  Only a lunatic such as a 'Hollywood Nazi' would wish the genocide of the Jewish people, so realistically if the harm of the diaspora is to be stopped, then the Jews, Maranos and Crypto-Jews, need to be removed from our lands.  If they are to be removed, they have to be removed to somewhere else.

Adolf Hitler understood the Jewish question just as did Theodor Herzl.  Although coming from different positions, both understood that Assimilation of Jewry and Europe would mean the death of both.  Herzl proposed the creation of a Jewish State.  Hitler proposed the removal of Jews from Europe, ideally to a new homeland far removed from our borders.  Joseph Stalin also understood the need for a Jewish State.  Stalin took the need for a Jewish homeland to the point of creating a Jewish State in Biro-bidjan, near the Chinese border with Russia.  All three thinkers were right!

It is time for Europeans worldwide to stop allowing outsiders, traitors  and self-haters to dictate what we should care about.  The Israeli authorities have so far killed just short of 2,000 'Palestinians'.  This  is sad for the families involved, as indeed it is sad for the families of the Jews killed by the Arabs.  But what does it mean to Europeans?  Ultimately, we have to view the Israel-Palestine conflict through the lens of how it impacts upon our lives.  In the end, the deaths of all 2 million Gazans are not worth a single tear in Europe - they simply do not matter. What matters is the survival of our people; nothing else.

In Bradford, the MPs who are supposed to represent the people of the city, David Ward, Gerry Sutcliffe and George Galloway, have been bending over backwards to suck up to the Moslem colonisers who they rely upon to get elected to a life of excess and corruption in Westminster.  Ward broke UK law by speaking out in support of Hamas terrorist attacks upon civilians - but was not arrested.  Galloway routinely wears Moslem garb and praises invaders of our land, as well as using rhetoric wish incites violence and encourages UK passport holders to murder people overseas as well as indigenous Britons.  Sutcliffe is less sycophantic to the colonisers as the other two, but he also uses his Parliamentary position to do the bidding of the colonisers, by interfering in the affairs of a foreign country, rather than concerning himself with the well-being of the one he is elected to serve.  

The multiculti nightmare which is destroying Europe can only be halted when those behind it have been banished - and that means physically expelling those of the liberal-Judaic mind.  The treacherous MPs who would have English soldiers killed for the people of Gaza, and who regularly incite colonisers to attack non-Moslems are a symptom of the Judaic malaise.  Regardless of the authenticity of their claims to Israel, only by 'returning' the Jews to Israel - and encouraging its expansion - can we regain control of our lands, expel the parasites from Pakistan etc, and deal with the traitors of our own blood by the only means which suits those who collaborate with our enemies.

Until we see an end to the Jewish presence in Europe (indeed outside Israel) we will continue to see such horrific examples of coloniser chutzpah as the flying of the Palestinian flag in Tower Hamlets and Bradford by politicians who hate the English people.

Lutfur Rahman is an anti-White bigot who is known for his corruption, criminality and all round typical Pakistani behaviour.  Rahman is also the Mayor of Tower Hamlets in the Pakistani-occupied East End of London.  His fellow parasites have ethnically-cleansed the indigenous Cockneys from the East End, erecting the largest Mosque in Europe whilst converting Churches to their vile cult.  The East End Mosque is an infamous breeding ground of ISIS/ISIL-style terrorists.  

Liberals whine about the West Bank being colonised by Jews and Palestinians being displaced.  the same liberals are silent about Pakistani colonisation of the East End and the displacement of Englishmen.  Rahman boasts about building thousands of Council Houses for his people.  How does this differ from the settlements built in Samaria and Judea (the 'West Bank')?  It differs only because those being displaced in England are White, and liberals don't give a damn about us.

It is truly sad to see the organised Right and the Third Position siding with Palestine.  Palestine/Pakistan - they differ only by a few letters.  Culturally, religiously, parasitically, criminally, violently - they are the same.  We would not get involved in a dispute involving Pakistan, so why bother getting involved with Palestanis/Pakistinians?

The only solution to the problems facing Europe is to follow in the footsteps of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Theodor Herzl - to embrace Zionism as a National concept (as opposed to a base of operations for a Global Jewish hegemony).  A strong and large Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, with room to home all the Jews of the entire world; a nation with access to oil; a nation which can be self-reliant and have no need to interact with the outside world; a nation which can turn its back on the parasitism of the Wandering Jew; the nation dreamt of by Ze'ev Jabotinsky - this is the solution to the Jewish problem and to the liberal multi-culti nightmare.  Those who have a logical and understandable animosity to Organised Jewry, need to face the reality that the only way to fight parasitism is to give the would-be parasites room to live exclusively amongst themselves.  If they can adjust to living worthwhile lives without exploiting others, so much the better; if not, that isn't our problem.

We need to stop the bloodletting in Europe - to save our kin in the Ukraine.  What happens to the 'Palestinians' has as much bearing upon our well-being as a Chinaman stepping on an ant.  It is sad for the ant, but doesn't matter insofar as the survival of the European people is concerned.  What happens in Europe does matter - That should be our focus, not a distraction on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean.

Why we shouldn't cry for Gaza in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

On the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, the tiny coastal sliver of Gaza has been bombarded by Israel for over a week.  Interestingly, in Europe the controlled media and the alternative (also controlled) media, have taken the position that we should have sympathy for the people of Gaza, and should be outraged by the actions of Israel.  Those of us who fight against globalisation and the over-representation of Jews amongst those who are driving us to cultural and ethnic genocide, tend to be happy to jump on the anti-Israel bandwagon.  Although it is against all instincts to say anything which could be considered an endorsement of Israel, are we wise to react to all news from that region with instant hostility to the Jewish State?

The United Nations has concluded that 80% of all those killed in Gaza have been civilians.  Now, if we look at that another way, for every militant killed, four civilians have been killed as collateral damage.  This can only be the case if the fighters of Hamas have been hiding in civilian areas, using ordinary people as willing human shields.  In this case, if those who support the fighters are considered as collaborators, then the number of 'innocents' must surely fall to a very small number indeed.

The issue of the legitimacy of Israel is one which can be argued endlessly.  However, the fact that Israel does indeed exist, has to be taken into consideration.  From a purely pragmatic position, it doesn't matter if Jews have stolen Arab land; what matters is that there is a homeland for the Jews to be sent to live in.

I can imagine some people reading this will be furious at the suggestion that we should accept Israel and to put it bluntly, to hell with the Palestinians.  The Jewish domination of Banking, the Stock Exchange, the European Monarchies and Aristocracies, the legal and governmental institutions etc, naturally provoke anger from the indigenous people of Europe who are being bled dry to feed the greed of the Jews and their collaborators.  Throughout history, the parasitism of Organised Jewry has resulted in the Jews as a whole being expelled from nation after nation.  They have become the 'wandering Jews' simply because after a certain time, the people of every nation in Europe have thrown them out; but they have not - until 1948 - had anywhere to go to.  It is natural and healthy to wish to be rid of the Jewish presence in Europe, but unless they have somewhere to go to, how can the problem be solved?

Mass immigration and so-called multiculturalism (aka European genocide) has been pushed by Jewish pressure groups and politicians in Europe, with the support of internal traitors.  This has allowed us to experience first hand the qualities of immigrants from wholly different cultures to our own.  Those of us who live with the daily abuse of moslem supremacist bigots, find it hard to cry for the moslems in Gaza.  Of course, knowing that it was Jews who brought these vile creatures to Europe in the first place, makes it impossible to cry for the Israelis either.

The bombing of Gaza shouldn't be the cause for concern for anyone in Europe.  When twenty years ago the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda were killing one another, nobody went to great lengths to take sides, although there were justifications for the violent actions from both sides for people who cared to look for them.  We find ourselves being drawn into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through direct knowledge of the barbarity and outright evil of Islam, and through the understanding that our financial predicament and the genocide of Europe is largely Jewish by design.  We find ourselves forced to choose who we hate more - just like in a General Election when people vote against politicians they despise most, rather than for anyone.  This is a mistake we need not make.  We do not have to support the lesser of two evils, we simply need to not support any evil at all.

From a position of pure and simple self preservation, we need to resist calls for the destruction of Israel.  As long as there is a Jewish State, there is a place where Jews, Maranos and Crypto-Jews can be sent to.  The Holyhoax lie is that we are a genocidal people who have it in us to exterminate those who seek to destroy us.  We are not genocidal maniacs; we are by nature tolerant and compassionate; this has not actually done us any favours. If Israel falls, the Jews will flood into Europe to join those who already rule over us, and the multiculti nightmare will get worse and worse.  If Israel lives, then the Jews can be made to undergo their 'right to return' to their own land - and it doesn't matter one bit whether the land they go to is theirs; all that matters is that we are free of them.

The people of Palestine follow the same pædophile superstitious drivel as the Pakistanis who infest our towns and cities.  If we look at them as 'Pakistinians', with the same tendencies as those who have destroyed Bradford, London and many other parts of England (and indeed much of Europe) - pædophilia, rape, violence, theft, deception, heroin supplying etc - then why oh why would anyone with any decency wish to defend such people?  Yes they have lost their land, but their co-religionists are stealing ours, with their fullest blessings.

The best outcome for the Israeli-Palestinian struggle would be the realisation of the Zionist dream of a land for the Jews stretching from the River Nile to the River Euphrates.  If the Jews were to have such territory, there would be no excuse for the continuation of the diaspora.  Under such conditions, the non-Jews of the world would be liberated from Jewish domination; so long as every single Jew was 'encouraged' to return to the Jewish State.  With the Jewish presence removed from power in Europe, we could reverse mass immigration from outside Europe, and once again be masters in our own homes.  Before we can abolish multiculti political correctness, we have to remove those who preside over it; the Jews must go to their own land and of course the liberal collaborators must be dealt with as is appropriate.

France has seen riots with moslems and Jews fighting in the streets.  It is unacceptable that non-Europeans use European soil to air their grievances.  It is unacceptable that non-Europeans are allowed into Europe other than as tourists coming to visit us for maybe a fortnight a year.  If we are pragmatic, we have to stop whining about dead Arabs in Gaza and take the logical and unemotional position, that it isn't our problem.  If Israel falls apart, the Jewish presence in Europe will increase and with them so will our suffereing at the hands of the multicultural 'politically correct' invasion.  

What matters is the survival of Europe.  If that means doing nothing whilst Israel occupies more territory, then so be it.  If that means doing nothing whilst the Jews displace Arabs in the region into other Arab lands, then so be it.  If that means doing nothing whilst Jews slaughter Palestinians, again, so be it.  We do not have to be friends of Israel; we do not have to be pro-Jewish; we have to be realists with the knowledge that the moslems in Gaza are of the same ilk as those who have ruined our homelands, and that our best hope of getting rid of the moslem vermin in our shores is to allow the Jews to build up a strong homeland for themselves - and to make sure that they go live in it!  We must not lose our only chance of freedom by worrying about people who couldn't give a damn about us - Jews, Moslems, anyone.

Undocumented Migrants are ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, aka Criminal Invaders

The mainstream media is a distorter of reality, which uses the manipulation of language to push

propaganda lies.

The UK Daily Mail has reported an encouraging story about US citizens blockading buses carrying criminal invaders of all ages, demanding that these parasites are not allowed to cross into the USA.  The Daily Mail has twisted the facts, to reclassify the illegal immigrant vermin as 'undocumented migrants', which implies that they are merely people migrating to another country, who simply don't yet have the necessary paperwork!  This is a lie: the reason that they don't have legal documents is that they are criminal invading scum, who are breaking into another people's homeland, just as a burglar breaks into other people's homes.

The Daily Mail has added further emotional emphasis to its distortion of reality by stating that the people flooding into the USA are 'undocumented migrant children and their families'.  Did you see the emphasis there?  Yes, the people who the horrible protesters object to are children!  How could anyone object to little babies who have never done any harm to anyone?  How?  By simply pointing out the age of the invaders doesn't make any difference - they are invaders who are invading an other people's land, to steal work, benefits, food, housing and everything else which they have no right to.

Another favourite tactic of the media is to shew 'children' throwing stones at the army or police, and wailing when they have their heads cracked for their criminal behaviour.  It is as if there is a timescale in which children can do whatever they are made to do by adults, and anyone who objects is a nasty 'hater' and should be silenced.  Whether it is immigrant children used as a advanced party to gain a beachhead for their invader families, or children throwing stones at the authorities in order to provoke a reaction which can then be used as psychological warfare propaganda, or children who have had their minds wrecked by superstitious drivel and their bodies raped by adults who fit them with explosives to murder their enemies, it doesn't matter.  Those who are not of the nation, have no business being in the nation, and whether they are babies, children, teens, adults or geriatrics, makes no difference whatsoever.

On this 4th of July, the Americans who are defying the traitors in Washington DC deserve the support of all people in every nation who are struggling to fight off the global movement of people which is designed to mongrelise the world and destroy all opposition to the global slave state.

For more of the Daily Mail's lies, visit the following link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2677429/Return-sender-Hundreds-furious-protestors-block-road-buses-carrying-140-women-children-illegal-immigrants-force-border.html

Take note of the carefully manipulated imagery which portray the invaders in a  positive light and the resistance as bad 'child-hating' people, who are intent upon breaking up families by not allowing the entire Third World to flood across the sovereign and sacred borders of the nation!  The story is about the USA; it could be about any country of European origin.

Polish Nationalists Destroy Multicultural Antifascist Festival in London June 21st 2014

No wonder JewKIP are so keen to attack our Polish brothers and sisters, whilst making the insane claim that Pakistanis with UK documents have more right to be here than Europeans!

Long live the European Nation.  Let us hope that the heroic actions of our brethren from the east inspire the subdued Anglo-Saxons and Celts to arise from their slumber and join the fight against the liberal neo-Marxist 'politically correct' genocide of our people.