A Festive Picture Which Says It All

Happy Saturnalia! For a Return to the Golden Age and an End to the Theft of our Traditions

Today is the 21st December in the Gregorian Calendar.  The fact that we now use the Gregorian Calendar and not the Julian one does have an impact upon this date and indeed every date which has a significance in pre-Gregorian times.  Pope Gregory XIII changed the calendar in 1582 to correct discrepancies with the equinoxes which had been brought about by the imperfections of the Julian system (which itself was finalised in the AD 8).  To make the calendar more accurate, the 4th October 1582 was followed by the 15th October.  When the British Empire (including what is now the USA) adopted the Gregorian system in 1752, the 2nd September was followed by the 14th September.  This shift in the way we consider the date serves to confuse the linkage of our present festivals to those of pre-Gregorian days.

An ancient custom which stretches back to 497 BC is the festival of Saturnalia.  The festival was officially sanctified with the dedication of the Temple of Saturn, but its origins are far older than the 2511 years we know of.  At its height, Saturnalia ran from the 17th to the 23rd of December (under the Julian Calendar, based on a prior one!)

The festivities enjoyed during Saturnalia included the following:

• Cutting down a tree and decorating it
• Having feasts of food and drink
• Giving and receiving gifts
• Helping the poor
• Wearing the Phrygian Cap (similar to the Santa Clause Hat)
• Role Reversal, with Bosses waiting on the workers whilst they enjoyed the freedom of the day
• All shops, schools and places of work being closed
• Peace on Earth - as no Wars could be declared
• Dressing in party clothes
• Playing games for bets of nuts
• Having fun, including being a bit naughty
• Singing songs door-to-door (although at Saturnalia, the singers were often naked!)
• Having someone dress up as Saturn in a fur-trimmed hooded costume
• Eating a suckling pig (festive ham)

In AD 312, the Roman Emperor, Constantine, officially remade the Roman Empire into a monotheistic one, jettisoning the old Gods in favour of a new one.  At that time, the deity Mithras, was gaining much support across the Empire.  Mithras was a Sun God based on the Greek solar deity, Helios (a deity which was worshiped in Greece at the same time as Saturn was worshiped in Rome).  In the First Century BC, Mithras had gathered the following characteristics:

• When he was born, three wise men from the Persian East brought him gifts of Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh
• He had a celibate life, preaching and performing miracles
• He died on a Cross and was entombed in a cave at the time of the Spring Equinox (Easter), before ascending into Heaven
• He held a Last Supper with his Twelve Disciples
• His Birthday was celebrated on the 25th of December

When the Roman Empire adopted monotheism, Saturnalia was moved to the 25th of December and its name changed to link up the Empire-wide festivities with the mandatory monotheism of the population.  However, rather than making Mithras the single deity for the Roman Empire - perhaps due to the ancient Greek Helios, (upon which Mithras was founded) being a part of a pantheon himself - Constantine chose the deity Jesus Christ.  It is for this reason that on the 25th of December, the people of Europe came to celebrate Christmas with all the ancient festivities which were practiced long before the Christian religion was founded, and why the Nativity Plays feature scenes which those who worshiped Mithras would have understood.

The end of Mithraism came through a brutal suppression of that faith by the Imperial Roman Church, with bloodshed which would have rivaled the later persecution of 'heretics' in the bloody massacres of the Inquisition.  The official state religion of Rome was pushed out to every corner of the Empire, with all other systems of belief suppressed by force - including versions of the State religion which went against the State-worshiping edicts of Saul of Tarsus: the Jewish apostle who was the chief architect of Christianity and through his Rabbinical writing, demanded respect for Earthly Authority as a duty of all Christians.

Not content with misappropriating Saturnalia, the Roman Church misappropriated other traditions belonging to people who had their own ways which they continued to practice in private.  Some of these included:

• The Druidic rite of cutting the sacred Mistletoe at Alban Arthan (Winter Solstice) as a part of a fertility rite: Kissing (and more!) under the Mistletoe
• Odin the All-Father riding his eight-legged horse, Sleipnir, though the northern sky: Father Christmas and his flying reindeer at the north pole.
• Dies Natalis Solis Invicti: the Birth of the Sun after the mid-Winter pause as a Holy Day, 25th December

The Festival of Christmas predates Christianity.  Our European forebears celebrated Saturnalia as a

festive period to remember the Golden Age of Plenty; an Age without Social Classes, Hunger, War, Sickness etc etc; an Age of the Gods; a time before the Descent of Man.  Interestingly, this Golden Age is referred to in every culture.  The Golden Age goes by different names: Eden, Atlantis, Hyperborea, Gullaldr, Satya Yuga, to name a few.  With great irony, considering that the Pagan Traditions were co-opted by the Judaic infiltrators of Rome, the Jews themselves refer to a Golden Age; even to the point of claiming that Saturnalia was stolen from them!

The Church of Rome thrived because it absorbed the traditions of the European people; adding them piece-by-piece to the Roman system of government, using the Christian faith as the spiritual justification for their power.  The massacre of the Druids, the Verden Saxons, the Cathars, the Nestorians, indeed of Pagans across Europe, did not destroy the European spirit.  The fact that the Church had to resort to stealing our festivals and murdering dissenters in order to make us obedient, is evidence of the validity of our traditions, rather than theirs.

The issue of the ancient Israelites in relation to the peoples of Europe is a different issue to the Judaisation of Europe through the Established Catholic and Protestant Churches.  That is an area of debate which there is no room for here.  As the Church of Rome has now started to throw off the outer garments of European identity and become more obviously a front for Judaislam, now is the time to take back our festivals and to celebrate them in the way our ancestors intended.  Happy Saturnalia, Happy Solstice, Happy Yule and Happy Christmas to everyone.  Let's kick Judaism out of our traditions, starting right now!

Stop the Harmonisers: Stop the Destruction of Humanity

Yesterday on BBC Radio Cymru, I heard a news item which incensed me to the point that I nearly crashed my car into a lake!  The offending item concerned an imperialistic globaliser who has made the outrageous statement that the Welsh language is holding back the people of Wales and preventing them from enjoying the cultural and economic joys which their English neighbours enjoy!  The item continued to state that the globalist oracle considers the Eisteddfod to be an anachronism which should be abolished in favour of the English cultural experience.

The globalist attack upon the Welsh culture was in the news in January when the English bigot, when Lichfield MP Michael Fabricant attacked the Welsh language on the BBC propaganda outlet, 'Any Questions' (Radio 4), and the Welsh Assembly leader of the Conservative faction, Andrew Davies refused to take a stand in favour of his own country.  Those who attack the Welsh language seem to be arguing that the Welsh culture is inferior to the English one, by stating that there is no Welsh Shakespeare (and conveniently forgetting the great Welsh poets who have no equals in England) - but of course, what is really under attack is the vibrant Welsh language and the pride that the Welsh have in their traditions and nation, not because what they have is inferior, but because unlike the modern globalised 'culture' in England, what the Welsh have is real and not throw-away consumer crap.

The Welsh language is a rich and beautiful one, and although very hard to learn, it is worth the effort of everyone who spends any time in Wales trying to learn what they can.  Shewing respect to the Welsh in Wales, opens doors to a whole way of life which arrogant outsiders who belittle the nation cannot appreciate (nor should they be allowed to).  Far from being some kind of joke, the Eisteddfod is a living expression of a living culture.  Unfortunately, the so-called 'International Eisteddfod' has seen all manner of foreign rubbish promoted in what should be a purely Welsh affair.  The Globalisers are more than happy to ridicule Welsh Culture, but they are silent about the presence in a festival of Welshness of Pakistanis in full tribal costume pushing their pathetic moslem drivel.  Racism and xenophobia against Europeans is always encouraged by the Globalisers and the Eisteddfod has suffered due to allowing the 'politically correct' liberal-consumerist enemies of humanity a place in it.  Let the Pakistanis celebrate their culture (religious bigotry, violence, theft, drug crime, rape, pædophilia, homosexuality and the hypocritical persecution of homosexuals) in Asia - indeed let them do so all year round and not set foot in Europe for a moment.  As for the liberal vermin who seek to make the Eisteddfod a Global event which mocks the Welsh nation and all the people of Europe, the only place they deserve in the festivities is hanging from a Scaffold made of Welsh wood!

The argument against the Welsh language is simply imperialistic propaganda.  Across the border in England, our own nation had a tapestry diverse cultures, which were eroded by the imposition of a single language by the Ruling Class.  The English Empire of Elizabeth Tudor (who ironically was of Welsh blood and belonged to the family which annexed Wales in the first place) was founded on the destruction of the many diverse cultures which had been alive in the land up until her reign.  Harmonising the language benefited the Ruling Class, by making it easier to subjugate the people.  A single nation, with a single language and a single culture, controlled by a single government, is far easier to control than a collection of peoples with their own ways.  What Elizabeth Tudor did to the English was the same as what the European Union is doing to all of Europe.

The British Empire was a Brutish Empire - it benefited the Ruling Class but turned the ordinary people into flag-waving buffoons who cheered on those who made them into wage slaves.  The modern Globalist Order is an extension of the Empires which exploited the people in territories captured outside Europe, but exploited the people at home even more so.  The Global Ruling Class don't give a damn about us other than that we produce and purchase their inferior and pointless products.  For them to attack the freedom of those who have a distinct language and culture in a very small nation, highlights just how far they will go to ensure that there is no such thing as real diversity on their global plantation.

We need more nations, not fewer.  We need a Europe of a thousand flags, with a thousand languages.  We need a reborn Africa to do likewise.  We need the people of Asia to rise up and smash the vile political weapon which calls itself a religion (islam) and join in the global struggle against globalism. Rather than sitting back while a globaliser attacks a people for daring to have their own ways, we need to stand with our Celtic neighbours and aid their struggle by promoting our own diverse cultures and rejecting the puerile plastic obscenity which we are supposed to believe is worthy of calling the English way of life.  We need to bring back our old languages, our old flags, our old nations.  The globalisers have an easy job ruling over brain-dead masses who consume the same tedious television and who listen to the same semi-pornographic materialistic 'music'.  They hate anything they cannot control.  Imagine a reborn Wessex with a Saxon dialect which although Germanic, was as different from modern debased English as Dutch from Deutsch? A Mercia with its own ways; a genuine living Kernow....these are not pipe dreams.  Not long ago, speaking Welsh was punished by the London tyrants, but now it is the norm. We cannot allow a revived 'Welsh Not' to continue the criminal assault on freedom which our neighbours endured for centuries. 

 Cymraeg-am-byth!

Life Behind Enemy Lines

I live behind enemy lines in a part of Yorkshire which has changed beyond all recognition.  Like practically everyone in the UK, my ancestry is a mixture of all four nations of the British Isles (with some non-British, but still European genetics in addition).  The Yorkshire part of my family has been in the county for so long that our presence here goes back to a time when there was no such thing as the nation of England.  Through pain-staking research over generations, our presence in what is now known as Yorkshire can be traced back to the ancient Kingdom of Northumbria.  Sections of my kin have lived in the same territory for over one thousand years, but sadly, my own children will be the last generation to live in Yorkshire, as for their safety, we have been forced to make plans to evacuate ourselves from a land which has been ours for as far back as can be researched (and most likely for much longer).  

Modern Yorkshire is no longer the healthy mixture of Celts, Angles and Norsemen which gave our area a unique character amongst the founding nations of England.  Modern Yorkshire is an area subject to the most horrific conditions of alien occupation and indigenous treason.  It is no longer a land that we can call home; it is no longer 'green and pleasant'; it is a land awash with hostile non-Europeans who despise us and waste no opportunity to attack us in every way they can; it is a land with a considerable number of indigenous people who bring shame to the name of Yorkshire by their association with it.

To speak of colonisation is to speak of something which for most people is still only theoretical.  Liberals will dismiss such talk as paranoia or as 'racism', but then, such traitors to their own kind live in areas where the only immigrants are professionals who have adopted a thin veneer of respectability.  The professionals who outwardly adopt our ways are still a problem, as they deny employment to our own people and contribute to the housing crisis and the destruction of our land and resources by adding to the population boom.  For those who believe in Man-made Climate Change, one could even say that the constant use of heating by people who are from warmer climes and cannot cope with what we are genetically designed for, is a contributory factor to global warming!

Hebden Bridge is a typical liberal town, although the liberal majority tend to be people who have been forced out of London by the same Colonisers they defend in Yorkshire.  Perhaps it is the excessive self-medication on cannabis, ecstacy, mushrooms etc which makes the liberals believe in their hippy fantasies of co-existing with hostile aliens who don't give a damn about such ideas as equality, love and peace.  Whatever the reason,  the liberals who live away from the colonised areas minimise the negative impact of the colonisers, providing excuse after excuse for even the most heinous crimes such as child rape.  The refusal to accept that there are bad people amongst the colonisers (rather than imaginary angels who are beyond criticism), and that it doesn't make one a 'racist/nazi/Islamophobe' to object to the obliteration of all we hold dear, only encourages the reprehensible behaviour of those who - quite justifiably - believe they can do whatever they like without any negative consequences to themselves.

Where I live has gone through many changes in my own lifetime: from an area of indigenous Yorkshire folk and Irish immigrants living peacefully together; to an area bordered by a hostile colony of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis; to an enclave of Yorkshire folk, Irish and Poles surrounded by hostile Pakistanis and Bangladeshis; to the current phase of a rapidly disintegrating group of streets with Pakistanis and Bangladeshis ethnically cleansing the area of all who are not of their breed - although to call wiping out the indigenous and European presence by Asiatic hordes 'cleansing' is a most peculiar use of that term!

Not many years ago our streets were communities, with everyone on speaking terms - whether it was just to say hello in passing or to go into each others homes as guests.  Now, the community cohesion has been shattered and the atmosphere is more like that which one would expect under siege conditions.  Our streets are no longer safe.  On my own street there are burglars, rapists, pædophiles, drug addicts, drug dealers, violent alcoholics and all manner of scum.  The advent of the immigrant invasion has brought with it a change in the character of our area.  When I speak of living behind enemy lines, I am not speaking just of the colonisers; I am speaking to a very great extent about the newcomers to my area who are also indigenous, but of a lower form.

The heroin dealers may be Pakistanis, but their customers are overwhelmingly English.  The pædophile gangs may be dominated by Pakistanis, but there are also indigenous beasts who prey on children.  The same goes for the pimps who prostitute our children in order that they may make money to buy their drugs - the men who control the trade are Pakistanis, but the customers include a considerable number of White Englishmen.

When the Colonisers began to move into my area, the 'for sale' and 'to let' signs sprang up.  Decent folk moved out, to be replaced by Colonisers and those who enjoy the 'enrichment' the Colonisers bring with them.  The liberal blind-spot which manifests in the mantra ' there is good and bad in everyone' (and in fact is a refusal to see any bad in anyone who is not of our kind) is mirrored in the 'nationalist' refusal to accept that a very large part of the problems we face (indeed the greatest part) comes from a refusal to see any bad in our own kin and any good in others.

Living behind enemy lines has taught me who the real enemy is.  Yes, the Pakistanis who come into our country demanding that we change our laws to suit them; who rape our children; who sell heroin on our streets; who attack any non-Pakistanis they outnumber sufficiently to have no problem beating; who cry 'racist' if anyone dares to not bow and scrape before them - yes they are a problem and one which must be removed from all of Europe.  Yes, the (largely Talmudic) finance industry and Establishment which created mass immigration in order to create mass unemployment and crush wage demands - yes, they are a problem which must be overthrown.  But by far the greatest problem is the people of our own kind who aid and abet the twin headed beast of the Ruling Class and the Colonisers: the liberals who are willfully blind to anything that the colonisers do which harms our people, land and way of life; the chav scum who are so self-obsessed that they have no qualms about robbing, raping, race-mixing and engaging in any activity which harms the people; the silent majority who couldn't care less about anything which doesn't directly impact upon their lives.  The Colonisers can be repatriated.  The Establishment can be replaced.  The greatest enemy is those who are of our kind and who either do nothing to stop our enemies, or actively participate in the decline of the nation.

As Friedrich Engels wrote, “The lumpenproletariat, this scum of the decaying elements of all classes, which establishes headquarters in all the big cities, is the worst of all possible allies. It is an absolutely venal, an absolutely brazen crew...Every leader of the workers who utilises these gutter-proletarians as guards or supports, proves himself by this action alone a traitor to the movement.”  The scum who are happy to live amongst those who trade in heroin, children and the spoils of human misery - they are not worthy of saving and are certainly not to be considered as allies in our struggle for freedom simply because they happen to be of our kin.  We need to face up to the fact that there is a great deal of dross amongst our own people and that in order for us to survive, it is best if the worst of our people is wiped from the face of the Earth.

I live deep behind enemy lines.  I used to think that the front line was where the areas occupied by the colonisers met; it isn't.  I used to think that the battle could be won by removing the Ruling Class who have profited by destroying the cohesion and stability of the nation; although that is vital, it isn't enough.  I believed that if only we could educate the liberals they would wake up to the menace destroying all we hold dear, and then they would join the resistance: they won't wake up, because even when their own lives are being wrecked, they will still cling to their delusions and refuse to face the truth.

The front line is ourselves.  We have to take responsibility for our own lives; we have to protect our families; we have to stop living in a fantasy world where 'anti-Racism is code for anti-White' and all non-Whites are bad and all Whites good (globalisation means the destruction of every race, the obliteration of every culture, the mongrelisation of everyone, and is as anti-African, anti-Asian, anti-Eskimo as it is anti-European); we have to stop sniveling and seeing ourselves as victims who have no part in our downfall; we have to stop waiting for someone else to save us; we have to stop viewing the blind and selfish masses as comrades waiting to be awoken.  

The pursuit of numbers at any cost has been the downfall of our struggle.  Quantity over quality is the sure path to defeat.  Looking outside ourselves for answers doesn't work; nor does making excuses for people because they are like us (as nationalists do) or not like us (as liberals do). There is a temptation to see ourselves as powerless and to blame everything which happens to us on others.  Inevitably we surrender responsibility in place of fear and anger.  The first step to taking control over our lives is seeing the pawns in the game for what they are, and refusing to play!  Strength does not come in numbers, but in clarity of thought and determination of action.  The old order is dead.  It is up to us to walk away from its carcass and build something worthwhile - the key word is US, not anyone else.

Freedom brings infinite possibilities.

When I began this blog, my main focus was upon the ancient world, sacred geometry and prehistorical mythology. Over time, this focus shifted into a defence of the natural order as applied to current times, then it shifted again into a narrow defence of my own racial group and a defacto attack upon those outside it. The reason for the shift has been a gradual change in the environment in which I live, which has impacted upon my desire to study esoteric matters. I am still fascinated by the ancient ways and by the truths which lay hidden in mythology and in what is pejoratively referred to as the Occult by people who do not understand that Occult simply means hidden, and is not in any way synonymous with anything 'evil'. When I first started writing, I had the luxury of exploring deep and obscure areas; now the situation in my locality has deteriorated to the point where my thoughts are concentrated on the more basic issues of mere survival. This says a lot about the situation in metropolitan Yorkshire.

Historically, the finest minds to produce the greatest philosophies have belonged to men who have lived remote from city life; men who have been free to push the boundaries of knowledge and understanding by virtue of not having to worry about the more mundane matters which preoccupy the rest of us.  There is a link between natural living and the ability to think.  City living is detrimental to all of us in many ways; spiritual, physical and psychological.  The rush to urbanise the West has the visible effect of wrecking the land, but it also has the equally disastrous effect of wrecking the people by pushing us into a form of existence which is not only un-natural, but anti-natural.

Abraham Maslow wrote in his 1954 work, Motivation and Personality, about a 'Hierarchy of Needs'. The common sense theory put into scientific form what is really self-evident; in order for people to reach their highest potential, they must satisfy their most basic requirements, such as adequate food and shelter. People who are constantly in fear for the security of their children or themselves, will obviously be at a disadvantage in the search for understanding, in comparison with those who live in safety. The decline of Europe and many other parts of the world can be seen as a direct consequence of destroying the security and well-being of the people, thus forcing them to focus upon their basic needs at the cost of exploring the infinite realm of possibilities which awaits our attention, if only we are allowed to give it.

A restoration of natural living is a pre-requisite for a sane world. The current engineered disconnection from nature has far deeper consequences than we are immediately aware of.  We are increasingly aware of its symptoms and to some extent we suspect its causes, but its full ramifications are staggering.

The artificial world is the world of materialism, wage slavery, greed, envy and fear.  This is the world which we let our rulers build up around us. This is the world which we must turn our backs upon.  That is not going to be an easy task!  What we need is a very real revolution, but a revolution of thought as well as of action.  Now, this is not something which we can expect to happen by following leaders who have their own agendas.  History points to the hijacking of genuine revolutionary movements by those who stood to lose most by the people rejecting the tyranny of finance or the dictatorship of religion.  We only need to look at the People's Republic of China to see that the promises of Mao Tse Tung have come to naught as the very materialistic forces that the revolutionaries under him thought they were overcoming, have turned the People's Republic into the People's Penal Colony.

Freedom comes when one takes responsibility for one's self and for one's kin and achieves the highest practicable degree of self-reliance.  The rural lifestyle of working on the land, bartering and sharing with one's neighbours and being true to one's word, is the natural lifestyle which provides the foundation for the pursuit of knowledge and the acquisition of wisdom.  Urban life is the antithesis of all which is wholesome.  The back-biting dog-eat-dog selfishness which comes from living detached from nature, can only be avoided if one escapes the city.  The modern economic system promotes city living and denigrates those who refuse to join in the scramble for material trinkets and the status possessing items deemed fashionable confers upon those who have them - regardless of how they obtain them.

The destruction of the land is directly linked with the destruction of the people.  If we do not have agricultural land, we cannot feed ourselves and thus we have to rely on others to produce food for us.  In the Capitalist system, food is a commodity like any other.  Food can also be used as a weapon.  When the Irish resisted the imperialist aggression of the Talmudised 'British' royal family and their assets in the Anglo-Irish Establishment, they were subjected to deliberate starvation as a collective punishment for daring to resist the tyranny of London.  Likewise, when the peasants of the Ukraine threatened the Talmudised 'Russian' government under Stalin, they too were subjected to mass starvation.  The Gorta Mór and the Holodomor may have occurred at opposite ends of Europe, but they were both instigated to break the will of subjugated people who dared to stand up against evil despots.

Every inch of soil which is concreted over is an inch of soil which is denied to the people.  We do not

need more housing, more motorways - and heaven forbid - more 'out of town' shopping centres!  We need a reduction in the population, and a redistribution of land.  The ancient measurement unit, the acre, is the amount of land which a man can plough in a day, using non-mechanised methods; it is the minimum amount of land which every British family should be entitled to as a birthright.  A return to the land following the restoration of the nation to its rightful owners - the people, not the Judaised Ruling Class or the immigrants brought in to drive down wages and perpetuate the exploitative economic corporate system - would see the UK turned from a land which has to rely on the good will (and trade) of others to feed its people, into a land in which every family could have enough land to grow its own food.  Removing the fear of hunger would be a vital step in the drive to raising up the population out of wage-slavery and onto the path towards the realisation of the full potential of every member of the nation. 

The UK is seen as the engine of the financial system which is destroying the planet - the City of London and the Stock Exchange are an international menace which are ruining every country upon which they have an influence; most of all the UK itself. Throwing off the shackles of finance imperialism is not only  something which we must do in order to save ourselves; it is something which would serve to help free the rest of the world too.  Our country could become a beacon of light to the world, rather than a festering sore, parasitically feeding on humanity.  Of course, this is long-term thinking, but it is not an impossibility.

We can build a better nation for our people if we try.  We have to cut off all support for the Establishment; for the pædophile-protectors in the police; for the supermarkets; for those who build upon our sacred land; for the television, radio, music industry and all other media of social control.  We can empower ourselves by policing our own neighbourhoods - and keeping the police of the enemy out!  We can build our own healthy and wholesome media to promote natural living and moral hygiene.  We can educate our children, rather than abandoning the most precious members of society to the State. We can make the effort to practice what we preach.  The first step towards a genuine revolution is the revolution of the mind.

Breaking free from the urban lifestyle is not simply a case of moving to the country - something which for many of us trapped in the inner urban sewer by falling house prices in our areas and escalating ones outside, cannot be done in any case.  Breaking free requires freeing our own minds.  We need to look at our most basic needs and then strive to fulfill them ourselves.  Starting at the very lowest level by growing whatever we can in order to loosen the stranglehold of the supermarkets, is a good step.  From that step we can use our new resources to barter with like-minded people who are sick of being held to ransom by those who can dictate the prices of our life resources.  As we liberate our selves from the death grip of the parasites who seek to control our most fundamental requirements, we can then move our focus up to achieving self control over more areas of our lives.

If we can take back control of our lives at the lowest levels, that will empower us to unite with others and to take back more power from our enemies.  We can then utilise this energy in taking the battle to the enemy and rather than passively accepting that we cannot change things, we will see that we already are doing and take this to inspire action at ever more daring and effective levels.

If we are to find freedom and to thus enjoy the ability to expand our horizons culturally, psychologically and in every way which really matters, we need to have the confidence to take the necessary measures to break free from the control of our owners.  We are wage slaves; we are slaves to the media; we are slaves to the unattainable goal of having a peaceful life of respectability and 'normality'. We are slaves because as a collective whole we accept our slavery and kowtow to the ne'er do wells and self-righteous majority who tell us that we can do nothing but live as we do.  Freedom brings with it infinite possibilities, but unless we are prepared to free ourselves, all our posturing, whining, exposing of the evils in others etc etc, will be pointless.  To thine own self be true - or shut up and obey your masters like a good little dog who may bark a little but is no threat to anyone.

Uniting the Resistance.

As the global enemy advance, more and more people are waking up to the diabolical game being played out, with us as the victims and in too many cases as the pawns.  The awakening of the people should be something to rejoice in.  However, the Establishment has very little to worry about, as far from being a unified force to reckon with, the Resistance is fragmented to the point of absurdity and not only this, it is wracked with in-fighting and ego-centrism which negates any chance of overthrowing our mortal foes.

In the UK, the media is so hysterically multiculti that anyone who doesn't go all out to praise immigration, homosexuality, pædophilia, abortion, miscegenation etc etc, is labelled as 'right wing', and thus automatically as evil. The imbecile public then refuse to vote for anyone 'right wing' as we all know that right wing means Nazi and Nazi means Gas Chambers!! The parties thus labelled (or perhaps more accurately, libeled) do not help themselves either - they bicker over the minutest details of policy and make a point of standing against one another. The bemused member of the public then has a choice of several parties who are to the uninitiated, pretty much the same. The result is the splitting of the anti-Establishment vote, with each party donating £1000 per seat contested, to the enemy for the privilege of playing a game that they cannot win!

The Establishment doesn't leave anything to chance though, as entire parties are created to take protest votes. UKIP only did so well in the EU elections due to being a part of the Establishment, wholly controlled by the eternal enemy.  UKIP cannot be counted as part of the Resistance any more than the kosher collaborators of the EDL can.  The general public see UKIP as their saviours, with some seeing them as the party which will first liberate us from the EU, then ultimately free us from the immigrant invaders who have been used as foot-soldiers in a war to destroy our culture and our very gene pool.  They will be sorely disappointed when UKIP fails to fulfill either of these hopes.

Democracy is a sham and it always has been. It is a puppet show which we should steer clear of.  Democracy is a tool for the implementation of communism/liberalism (same thing), as it treats everyone as the same, regardless of race, sex, intelligence, age, experience etc.   Participation gives the charade legitimacy.  

A 16 year old paki-stani rapist who wants Shariah Law, who by virtue of liberal lunacy has just come to live in Scotland and has no knowledge of the Culture, Language, History or Traditions of the UK and/or Scotland, has the same voting power in the forth-coming referendum of splitting from England, as a 70 year old Scotsman who has worked his entire life to build the country.  This is clearly not right, but it is the essence of democracy; a fraudulent farce with all the sophistication of a daytime television programme; a pathetic marketing ploy to convince the people that the placing of a cross on a ballot paper will grant them their every whim - just so long as their whims are halal/kosher-certified.

Joseph Stalin best summed up the reality of the democratic system when he made the following statements:

• I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.

Stalin may have been speaking about elections within the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, but the futility of elections in the representative system is obvious for those who care to examine the nature of the system.  In the UK, as with most European countries (if not all), all parties and individuals who progress within the system, do so only because the views they air are tolerated by the legal-political-economic Establishment.  Anyone who strays from the 'politically correct' path, faces public censure by the controlled media (quite possibly for the sake of appearances in the case of controlled opposition such as the EDL and UKIP), or imprisonment ( and worse) if they go too far out of the acceptable sphere and really will not play the game. 

• Ideas are more powerful than Guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? 

Now the second quote by Joseph Stalin encapsulates the entire modus operandi of the democratic state.  The people are presented with false choices which may appear real enough, but do not stand up to scrutiny.  In the UK the major parties will promise almost anything which they believe the people will want.  If the people wish to leave the EU, they will promise a referendum; knowing full well that they cannot deliver it due to changes at European level which will make exit from the EU impossible by the time they propose to hold it.  Of course when the people want Muslim rapists and Jewish financiers to be expelled from the country and never let back in, the job of offering such policies is handed over to the myriad 'nationalist' parties, the majority of which are controlled by the State to some degree and are merely acting as proxies. 

The way in which the parties which officially stand outside the Establishment are controlled, is through division and pandering to an obsession with ideological minutiae.  In the 1970s the UK had a nationalist party known as the National Front, which had mass membership and began to believe that it had a chance of gaining control of the nation through general elections.  The NF vote was all-but wiped out by a sleight of hand of the Establishment, which employed the full power of the media to convey the impression that the Conservative Party under Margaret Thatcher would stop immigration and start repatriation of non-Europeans. 

The 1979 General Election pledges of the Conservatives were shame-faced lies; the party not only failed to repatriate anyone, it enacted policies which increased immigration; policies which have been ratcheted up by every government of every hue ever since.  Not content with taking vast amounts of money from the NF membership in election deposits for the 303 seats which were contested (every single deposit was lost), the powers-that-be ensured that a post-election NF would not be in a position to find a better strategy than fighting at national level; infiltrators and ne'er do wells split the NF, with the formation of a succession of rival organisations, including the now notoriously kosher, BNP.

The National Front went from being one of the largest Nationalist organisations in Europe, to a very small organisation indeed.  Internal splits caused by outside (State-controlled) trouble-makers, alongside egomania from people who should have known better, saw the creation of numerous organisations, some of which stumble on to this day.  The National Front achieved a degree of ideological purity which was truly astounding.  For anyone who wishes to understand the absolute essence of the National struggle, one can do no better than read the NF publications, Nationalism Today and New Nation.  

Having achieved an ideology which was based on self-reliance, love of own (rather than hatred of others), tradition and respect, further in-fighting saw the great advances lost as the ITP split off and the minute National Front renamed itself the Third Way and shifted headlong into becoming precisely the kosher liberal entity which the NF had campaigned against.  The Third Way name has since been changed again to the National Liberal Party.  Those who call themselves the NF today come from factions who split from the NF in the 1980s; the NLP is the NF in its current phase.  The multi-culti, wishy-washy pro-homosexual, pro-Jewish, pro-immigrant NLP may seem a long way from the NF of the 1960s, but it is a logical result of the politics of the ego over the needs of the people.

We who proclaim our lofty ideals and our commitment to our people, are our own worst enemies.  We allow ourselves to be swayed by personalities and to become obsessed with tittle tattle about our alleged rivals.  Just as the NF split itself into near oblivion, with what is left of it becoming a liberal disgrace, the fracturing of the 'nationalist' movement continues apace.  People who are allegedly on our side, spend more time back-biting and spreading malicious gossip about one another than they do promoting the cause.  When they do promote the cause, it is to promote their particular faction and to denigrate others - recruiting from rival organisations rather than getting new blood involved.  I find the lunacy of it all, breath-taking.

If there is one thing the British people are very good at, it is not learning from the mistakes of the past. Once again, in the UK, there are two organisations which call themselves the National Front (perhaps imagining that resurrecting a name discarded by a now openly multiracial organisation would inspire the British people). The inability to unite within the same organisation is astonishing when one considers that both NFs have the same policies, same symbols, claim the same heritage and except for the people leading them,  are the same!  One would have hoped that having seen the largest nationalist organisation in Europe shattered to the point that every egomaniac in the movement had his own little fiefdom, the focus of the post NF world would have been unity of purpose, if not of organisation.  Nothing could be further from the truth. 

As if to prove that the anti-Globalist movement in the UK really is (to paraphrase Mussolini), Lions led by Donkeys, there are a wealth of rival factions in the nationalist arena,  all of which spend more time and effort trying to poach members from one another, than trying to save the nation.  The many groups include the BNP, British Movement, Racial Volunteer Force, British Freedom Fighters, NF (London-based), NF (Hull-based), National Action, Britain First, England First, British Democratic Party, English Democrats, Harmony Party, British Resistance, Liberty GB, Western Spring, the various Defence Leagues and Infidels, League of Saint George, and many others besides.  These do not include the likes of UKIP and NO2EU which are labelled by the media as sitting alongside the anti-Establishment groups, and seen to be by the electorate.  When the rival factions make their mutual hostility public by standing against one another in elections (often with literature pointing out real (or made-up) flaws), is it any wonder that the electorate find the whole fiasco confusing and irritating?

Standing against one another dilutes the vote, as those who oppose the Establishment parties find themselves confronted by parties who they would vote for, which differ only by name rather than any important policy.  Many people who would vote for an anti-Establishment party realise that to do so would be pointless.  They then either vote for one of the Establishment parties (hoping to elect the lesser evil) or do not vote at all.  As a result, the rival factions lose their deposits (effectively contributing to the coffers of the Establishment) and promote the image of weakness in the movement and an inability to rise above petty differences and personality issues; both of which, sadly, are true.  The obsession with only dealing with 'our own' insofar as already active members is concerned, coupled with hostility to the same people because of different factional labels, is our downfall.  It has to end if we are to avoid total genocide. 

The people do not care about the label used by the party which will deliver a freedom from the EU, repatriation of non-Europeans, end of rule by the Bankers, a restoration of British Industry etc etc.  The people only care about the policies.  So much could be achieved if the rival factions would only agree to stop fighting one another and to at least unite on single issues when given the opportunity.  Right now, the people of Scotland (and a good many foreigners who have no right to be there anyway) are being asked to decide if Scotland should remain in the UK, or split off and become a different slave state of the EU ruled by the same Jewish money power and multi-culti traitors, just with a different local administration centre independent.  Are those who support the Union putting differences aside on a simple yes/no vote?  Are those who support Scottish nationhood (and by extension English nationhood) putting their differences aside? Unsurprisingly, in both cases, they are not.  If we cannot unite under even these simplest circumstances, when can we?

We need some form of Nationalist Council to allow all the would-be fuhrers the space to be kings of their own castles, whilst avoiding confrontation with others.  Whether this can be achieved is debatable, but something needs to be done.  The Greek anti-Capitalists of the left wing variety were similarly fragmented before they had the wisdom to form the Coalition of the Radical Left (Syriza).  Rather than competing as thirteen rival factions, they united behind a common banner whilst maintaining independence as individual organisations.  The wisdom of abandoning this independence remains to be seen, but the initial ethos of Syriza worked.  Can we not do something similar ourselves?  Isn't this better than financially feeding the Establishment whilst watching our nation die through failure to get beyond personality issues and egomania?

To quote (again) Joseph Stalin (no I'm not a Stalinist, I just appreciate the wisdom in these selected quotes),

• We think that a powerful and vigorous movement is impossible without differences — "true conformity" is possible only in the cemetery.  

We don't have to like Stalin to know that there is much truth in these words.  Let us indulge our differences and find a way which allows our differences of thought to flourish, but not to become justification for fighting one another as the real enemy wipes the floor with all of us and our people cease to exist. 

Grooming? No, the word is Rape.

Over the last week, the Hull-based faction of the NF, the BNP, the EDL and Britain First have all been active in Rotherham, protesting against the over 1400 known rapes of indigenous English girls at the hands of Paki-stani moslems in just one moderately sized English town.  The number of victims across the country must be truly staggering, but Rotherham has become the focus of protests due to the number of admitted victims, whereas in the rest of the country, the cover-ups are still in full force.

Whilst it is good to see so many groups taking a stand against the vile and inexcusable destruction of childhood through rape, there are two problems with the ongoing protests - firstly, the number of groups involved highlights the futile divisions in the 'nationalist' movement; secondly the use of the euphemism 'grooming' legitimises a word which should not be used by anyone in this context.

The word 'grooming' has become the favoured euphemism of the Establishment.  The use of the term by 'nationalists' and other anti-pædophile activists is disturbing.  Grooming can be applied to animals (most obviously horses) to refer to a process of making them clean; grooming when applied to a person is anything which makes an individual better as a human being.  Thus a man may employ grooming as a means of making himself more presentable - such as being clean - or he may be groomed for advancement in society or employment by learning skills which make him a better individual; one worthy of attaining a higher status.  To employ the word 'grooming' to our children in connection with their rape at the hands of paki-stani pædophiles is abhorrent.

Are White girls dirty and inferior to pakis-tani men?  Does the act of rape improve these girls?  Being filled with the semen of multiple paki-stani men, to the point where of the 1400 admitted victims of moslem rape gangs in Rotherham, over 100 mongrel bastards were produced as a result - does that give the victims of gang-rape a higher status?  Presumably destroying the White genepool is a positive thing if this is the case; this is something the multicultists clearly applaud, but for 'nationalists' to use such terminology without thinking about what they are actually saying, is unacceptable.

Rotherham isn't a particularly large town, nor is it especially infested with pakis-tanis and other moslem rapists.  The Rotherham metropolitan area is comparable with the metropolitan boroughs and districts centred on Oldham, Rochdale, Halifax, Burnley, Blackburn and scores of other towns which are drowning in a sea of islamic invasion.  Rotherham is a lot smaller than areas such as Bradford which have been all but lost to the invaders; of course many of the boroughs in London dwarf the areas subjected to colonisation in the Pennine areas of Yorkshire and Lancashire, in terms of the sheer numbers of invaders there. 

There have been 1400 admitted rape victims in Rotherham alone; the number of victims across the UK must be phenomenal.  We must not forget that the UK is not the only country which is being destroyed by design.  The Netherlands, Belgium, France and Sweden are known to be in a worse condition than the UK.  The entire Serbian territory of Kosovo has been taken over by Albanian (Turkish) filth.  The scum in Bruxelles are even now engineering the entry of Turkey and the arab states of north Africa into the EU  The entire European Union is being colonised by our enemies, with the full blessing of our greater enemies; the Jewish-controlled Establishment.  Europe outside the EU is suffering a similar fate, with invasion underway as far away as Australasia.  This is invasion with purpose; the purpose is the annihilation of the European race.

To speak of 'grooming' is to use the language of the enemy; it is also to focus upon a symptom of the problems facing Europe, not the cause.  Those who chant 'hang pædophiles' unwittingly create the image of 'good colonisers' versus 'bad colonisers'.  There is no such thing as a good immigrant; every last one of them has broken into our homeland legally or otherwise, and added to the drain on our NHS, housing stock, energy and utility supplies, agricultural land etc.  Every last one of them has weakened our culture by bringing their divisive ways (diversity is division); has undermined our legal system by justifying legislation for the protection promotion of foreigners; has added to the suffering of our animals by bringing in superstitious drivel which goes against the indigenous love of animals which we were rightly proud of before we submitted to halal and kosher in our schools, supermarkets and elsewhere.

Rather than focus upon the rape of our children in Rotherham to the exclusion of all other offences against our people, the consistent message must be that all non-Europeans (by blood, not by pointless legal documents) and those who breed with them by choice or are products of miscegenation by any means, must be deported and never allowed to return.  To achieve this means going beyond the horrific creatures who worship allah Satan to the source of multiculturalism; the Elders of Jewry and their collaborators of every race.

We must stop using the term 'grooming' and call it what it is: RAPE.  We must stop playing the 'good immigrunt, bad immigrunt' game and call them what they are; parasites.  To stop the continued destruction of our people requires that we make no distinction between Jews and Muslims, immigrants who profess the desire to assimilate and those who seek to overthrow our way of life and openly speak of our destruction.  All of them must be expelled from Europe, and should they resist, then actions beyond marching through our streets with pretty banners, will be required.  Asking parasites to politely stop feeding on the host never works.

Right now, our people are focused upon the Moslem cancer yet they are ignorant to the Jewish one from which it sprang.  If we cut out one cancer and leave the other intact, we will still die.  We have to cut out all the cancers in our national body.  Polite protests are not enough.  We need action and we need action now.